Tag: South Africa

Categories : HIVTags :

Positive Interim Findings on New Once-weekly HIV Treatment Pill

On By ModernMedia
Researchers have found that a new once-weekly antiretroviral formulation appears to be as effective as the daily pills. Photo by Danilo Alvesd on Unsplash

By Marcus Low and Elri Voigt

A new antiretroviral combination pill that is taken only once a week appears to work as well as daily pills at treating HIV. This is according to interim study findings to be presented next week at the AIDS 2026 conference in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Almost all of the over six million people in South Africa who are currently taking HIV treatment are taking it in the form of one tablet taken once a day. These tablets contain a combination of three different antiretrovirals, most commonly dolutegravir, lamivudine or emtricitabine, and tenofovir.

Now researchers have found that a new once-weekly antiretroviral formulation appears to be as effective as the daily pills. The new pill contains only two antiretrovirals, islatravir and lenacapavir. A different formulation of lenacapavir is used in the six-monthly HIV prevention injections being rolled out at around 10% of public sector clinics in South Africa.

“I think this is the next treatment blockbuster,” Professor Francois Venter told Spotlight this week when asked about the new once-weekly pill. Venter is the Executive Director of the Ezintsha Research Centre at the University of the Witwatersrand. He was not involved in the studies of the once-weekly pill.

“Patients are crying out for less frequent dosing, and it does not have the fiddliness and complexity, the supply line, healthcare worker training, or resistance issues of the current or immediate next generation of injectables. Imagine dispensing the same number of tablets for 6 months as previously for a month. It looks cheap to make. Low- and middle-income countries really should be taking note,” he said.

Two studies

The findings to be presented in Rio are from the first 48 weeks of two relatively large, multi-country, phase 3 studies called ISLEND-1 and ISLEND-2. Both studies will continue for another 48 weeks. The final study findings will only be reported after the full 96 weeks are completed.

The two studies have similar designs. Both started out with people who were already on antiretroviral therapy and doing well on treatment (607 people in ISLEND-1 and 624 in ISLEND-2). The researchers then switched roughly half of the people in each study over to the weekly islatravir/lenacapavir pill. The outcomes of those who switched to the weekly pill were then compared to those who didn’t switch and simply kept taking the treatment they had been taking before.

A key difference between the studies is in the control groups. In ISLEND-1, the researchers specifically recruited just people who were taking the antiretroviral combination of bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide. In ISLEND-2, they recruited people who were taking whatever the local standard of care was (which often differs between countries). Some of the many ISLEND-2 clinical trial sites are in South Africa where the standard of care is dolutegravir, lamivudine or emtricitabine, and tenofovir.

Another notable difference between the studies is that ISLEND-1 is double-blinded, whereas ISLEND-2 is an open label study. This means that in ISLEND-1 neither study participants or their doctors know which study arm they are on – this is achieved by also giving people on the weekly arm daily placebo pills and people on the daily arm pills that look like the weekly placebo. In ISLEND-2, people know what study arm they are on and there is no need for placebos.

Both studies have a non-inferiority design, which is to say their main aim is to establish whether the weekly pill is roughly as safe and effective as existing treatments. Such designs are commonly used in HIV treatment trials given that existing treatments are already very safe and effective. The potential step forward in this research is the weekly dosing, not improved safety or efficacy against HIV.

“Developing new antiviral HIV medications remains important in order to address pill fatigue, adherence challenges, broaden treatment, with the goal of ending the HIV epidemic,” Professor Jürgen Rockstroh, lead author of the presentation of the ISLEND-1 results at AIDS 2026, told Spotlight by e-mail.

What the researchers found

The short version, as described in a conference media release, is that in both studies the weekly pill was found to be “efficacious and well tolerated and statistically non-inferior” to the controls it was measured against. In other words, based on the 48-week data, the weekly pill is passing the test so far. The findings have also been summarised in a media statement by pharmaceutical company Gilead Sciences.

The key indicator that the researchers looked at was the proportion of people whose HIV viral load was not suppressed at 48 weeks (they used a cut-off of 50 copies per millilitre of blood). If antiretroviral treatment is working well in someone’s body, one’s viral load is typically suppressed below this level.

In ISLEND-1, zero of the people on the weekly pill had a viral load above the cut-off, while one person on the bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide study arm was above the cut-off. In ISLEND-2, one person taking the weekly pill had a viral load above the cut-off, while four people on the standard of care arm were above the threshold. Given that outcomes on the weekly pill were technically better than for the controls, it should come as no surprise that the non-inferiority thresholds were met.

Though the once-weekly pill was well-tolerated, there are some interesting nuances in the safety data. In ISLEND-1, treatment-related adverse events were very similar between the two study arms. In ISLEND-2, however, treatment-related adverse events were reported in 18% of participants treated with the once-weekly pill compared to less than 1% receiving standard of care antiretroviral regimens. Among those receiving the weekly pill in ISLEND-2, the most common treatment-related adverse events reported were headache (5%), nausea (3%) and diarrhoea (3%). There were no red flags regarding more serious treatment-related adverse events.

“It is not uncommon to see a higher rate of treatment related adverse events in the experimental arm of an open label switch study due to reporting bias. That is, when someone knows they are on a new drug, they may be more apt to believe that any new symptoms are caused by the new drug,” Dr Amy Colson, a principal investigator for both ISLEND studies at a study site in Boston in the United States, explained to Spotlight. “Of note, all treatment related adverse events in ISLEND-2 were grade 1 or grade 2.  And importantly, the rate of treatment related adverse events in the ISLEND 1 study – which was a double-blind study – was nearly identical in the islatravir/lenacapavir and bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide arms which further supports that the discrepancy in ISLEND 2 may indeed be due in part to reporting bias in the open label study.” (Adverse events are graded from 1 to 4, with 1 being the least severe. Only grade 3 and 4 adverse events are considered severe.)

“It is too early to comment on how any safety signals from the ISLEND 1 and ISLEND 2 trials will impact eligibility for future studies or eligibility for treatment outside of clinical trials.  However, safety data at week 48 from both trials was reassuring.  The overall rates of adverse events, grade 3 adverse events, serious adverse events and discontinuations due to adverse events was highly comparable between islatravir/lenacapavir and comparator groups in both trials,” Colson said.

The early data from ISLEND-2 suggests that people who switched to the once-weekly pill prefer it to the daily treatments they were taking before. According to Colson, 78% reported that they were more or much more satisfied with the weekly pill relative to their prior daily treatment and 64% reported that their prior daily treatment was more of a burden than the weekly pill. More extensive data on people’s self-reported experience of the treatment will be reported on at a future conference.

The new weekly pill is not the first long-acting form of HIV treatment, although it is the first long-acting HIV treatment in pill form. HIV treatment injections administered every two months have been available in the United States for around four years. Spotlight has previously explored in depth why we do not have these HIV treatment injections in South Africa.

Next steps

In a media statement released early in June, pharmaceutical companies Gilead Sciences and Merck (called MSD outside of the United States and Canada) indicated that they plan to file the once-weekly pill with medicines regulators “globally”. Spotlight asked both companies whether this will include filing with the South African Health Products Regulatory Authority, but neither company answered this question. Gilead has the patent on lenacapavir and Merck on islatravir. ISLEND-1 and ISLEND-2 were sponsored by Gilead. Gilead has already filed a weekly lenacapavir pill, used for HIV prevention rather than treatment, for registration with the United States Food and Drug Administration.

The companies didn’t provide details in response to Spotlight’s questions on their pricing plans and whether they would license other companies, directly or through the Geneva-based Medicines Patent Pool, to produce generic versions of the pill.

“Merck and Gilead are committed to supporting global efforts to reduce the incidence and burden of HIV by bringing forward new treatments. This includes our joint investigational long-acting oral treatment option, ISL/LEN. The single-tablet regimen represents a potential step-change in HIV treatment by offering a once-weekly oral regimen that may broaden choice for people living with HIV,” a Merck spokesperson told Spotlight by e-mail. “We remain focused on advancing the development program. If approved, our decades of experience collaborating with a range of stakeholders will help us explore pathways with the goal of facilitating rapid uptake and broad access around the world.”

Republished from Spotlight under a Creative Commons licence.

Read the original article.

Categories : Expert Opinion Medical IndustryTags :

Rethinking Success in Primary Healthcare

On By ModernMedia
Dr David Sekete

The single greatest threat to South African primary healthcare isn’t a lack of resources or medical expertise – it’s how doctors are paid. That’s the consensus of a growing number of doctors, including Dr David Sekete, who has practised medicine in Katlehong for more than four decades. The traditional funding model, he argues, is systemically flawed, with consequences that ripple through every stage of a patient’s care.

“Many of the people I see live on modest incomes and struggle with the cost of care. Those covered by medical schemes face the same pressure from a different angle – benefits exhausted by mid-year, out-of-pocket costs remain high, and when cover runs out, GPs are left to choose between turning patients away or treating them at their own cost,” says Dr Sekete. “Over time, a doctor’s incentives and their patients’ interests drift apart. It is tempting to blame geography or poverty for these failures, but the barrier was never only location or scarcity. It is the payment model.”

In response, Dr Sekete restructured his practice entirely. Through The Value Care Team (TVCT), a programme powered by healthcare management company PPO Serve, he now receives a guaranteed, risk-adjusted monthly fee for every enrolled GEMS member, rather than billing for each consultation or procedure. Out-of-pocket costs fall away, patients can return throughout the year regardless of their benefits status, and the administrative burden of chasing schemes for payment is eliminated. The practice now operates as a single multidisciplinary facility, bringing together an optometrist, dentist, physiotherapist, psychologists, social workers, a mother-and-child unit, a dialysis centre, and on-site imaging and pathology under one roof.

This shift has fundamentally changed what the practice delivers, and nowhere is that more evident than in prevention. TVCT Care Coordinators follow up on diabetic, hypertensive and mental-health patients at home, educating entire families along the way. Weekly health talks cover diabetes, hypertension, and prostate and breast cancer; a mammography team visits monthly; and the wider team regularly takes its work into schools and churches across the community.

“Care stops being a series of emergencies and becomes something managed before it reaches crisis point,” says Lungile Kasapato, CEO of PPO Serve. “Patients who once arrived only when illness had become unavoidable now come in early, when problems are still simple and affordable to treat. This holistic approach creates a support system around the patient that simply does not exist in traditional fee-for-service models.”

The practice in Katlehong has since been awarded 100% accreditation by the Office of Health Standards Compliance, a rare achievement that proves value-based care can meet the highest quality standards. Yet adoption remains limited. Many GPs continue to favour fee-for-service, drawn by the prospect of higher individual billing, even as the system deteriorates around them: schemes cannot absorb rising claims, patients cannot afford increasingly expensive care, and healthcare moves further out of reach for ordinary South Africans.

“What Dr Sekete has built, proves that value-based care is not a theoretical ideal – it is a practical, replicable model that delivers better outcomes for patients, better sustainability for practitioners, and a more viable future for the sector,” says Kasapato. “Our ambition is to see this replicated in communities across the country.”

For GPs considering the transition, Dr Sekete is direct: get the foundations right first – a proper facility, the right staffing, a genuine multidisciplinary team, strong IT systems, and reliable laboratory and diagnostic support – then coordinate closely with the community. “What I want now is replication: pockets of excellence across the country, each one a working example others can build from. The only real question is whether the profession – and the system around it – is ready to adopt it.”

Categories : General InterestTags :

Dis-Chem Opens First On-site Staff Clinic as Employers Rethink Workplace Healthcare

On By ModernMedia

New facility at head office and distribution centre brings primary healthcare directly to employees, marking a shift from wellness awareness to healthcare access

Dis-Chem has opened its first dedicated employee clinic, located at its head office and distribution centre in Midrand, giving employees direct access to primary healthcare services without leaving the workplace. The clinic was launched during Corporate Wellness Week and forms part of a planned rollout to additional distribution centres across the country.

Modelled on the Health Hub ‘store of the future’ recently launched at Melrose Arch which makes healthcare delivery the core offering, the facility offers a full suite of clinical services including routine consultations, maternal healthcare, immunisations and vaccinations, with escalation to a doctor where needed.

The launch reflects a broader shift in how South African employers approach workplace wellness. According to Nomfundo Vilakazi, Dis-Chem’s Director of People and Culture, corporate wellness has traditionally centred on annual screenings, wellness days and fitness initiatives, programmes that raise awareness but do little to remove the practical barriers that prevent people from seeking care.

“For many working South Africans, routine check-ups are postponed and early warning signs ignored, not because health isn’t valued, but because accessing care isn’t always convenient. The experience we create for our people directly influences the experience our people create for our customers,” says Vilakazi.

 “If we want customers to experience care, expertise and seamless service, our employees, as our priority customers, must experience those same principles inside our organisation. If we expect our people to champion health, we must first make it possible for them to prioritise their own.”

The clinic launch coincides with another milestone for the company: the formal definition of its Employer Value Proposition (EVP), which reinforces our Holistic Healthcare pillar that distinguishes Dis-Chem as an employer of choice. The employee clinic, servicing over 2500 head office and distribution centre employees, is positioned as a tangible, living expression of that strategic EVP commitment rather than a standalone corporate benefit.

Lizeth Kruger, Clinic Executive at Dis-Chem, notes that research consistently shows that when employees can consult a healthcare professional without taking time off work or travelling long distances, they are more likely to seek preventative care, manage chronic conditions and address concerns before they become serious – benefits that extend to families and communities well beyond the workplace.

“This is not about treating illness,” adds Kruger. “Creating an environment where our people, customers and communities can thrive begins by caring for those who make that mission possible every day. When we invest in the health of our people, everyone benefits.”

The model also incorporates innovative virtual healthcare solutions. Where appropriate, and when the clinic nurse has managed the patient within the full scope of her practice, patients can be seamlessly connected to a doctor via a video medical consultation. This approach enhances access to comprehensive, holistic care by combining the on-site expertise of the nurse with the support and guidance of a medical practitioner, ensuring patients receive the right care at the right time.

Employees not based at the head office or distribution centre will continue to access care through Dis-Chem’s existing clinic network, ensuring healthcare remains within reach across the business. The company plans to extend the employee clinic model to additional distribution centres within the next year.

Categories : General Interest Surgeries & ProceduresTags :

How Wits Donald Gordon Medical Centre is Advancing Specialised Reconstructive Surgery in South Africa

On By ModernMedia
Photo by Natanael Melchor on Unsplash

When 12-year-old Eugene underwent a highly specialised facial reanimation procedure earlier this year, the surgery represented something profoundly human, the possibility of smiling for the first time.

Born with Moebius syndrome, a rare neurological condition that affects facial movement and expression, Eugene had spent his life unable to smile, blink properly or express emotion through facial movement. And while his story is emotionally powerful, it also shines a light on a far broader healthcare reality, the growing importance of highly specialised reconstructive surgery in restoring not only appearance but movement, function, dignity and quality of life.

At Wits Donald Gordon Medical Centre (WDGMC), reconstructive microsurgery is helping redefine what is possible for patients facing some of the most complex medical challenges, from congenital conditions and cancer to severe trauma and tissue loss.

Often misunderstood as a field focused primarily on cosmetic procedures, reconstructive microsurgery sits at the intersection of surgical precision, innovation and long-term patient rehabilitation. These procedures frequently involve transplanting tissue, muscle and nerves from one part of the body to another and reconnecting blood vessels, often measuring less than two millimetres in diameter, under microscopic magnification.

Leading this work at WDGMC is Dr Dimitri Liakos, a plastic and reconstructive surgeon with fellowship training in reconstructive microsurgery and super microsurgery.

Dr Dimitri Liakos, a plastic and reconstructive surgeon with fellowship training in reconstructive microsurgery and super microsurgery.

“These procedures are not simply about appearance,” says Dr Liakos. “They are about restoring function, movement and ultimately helping patients regain parts of their lives that were lost or that they were born without.” In Eugene’s case, surgeons transferred functioning muscle together with its blood and nerve supply into the face, reconnecting these delicate structures under a microscope so movement could gradually return over time.

Eugene’s procedure was facilitated through the support of the Smile Foundation, which works to improve access to reconstructive surgery for children requiring specialised care.

“We are deeply grateful to Wits Donald Gordon Medical Centre and Dr Dimitri Liakos for their dedication in supporting Eugene on his journey,” says Tarri Parfitt, CEO of Smile Foundation. “It is truly remarkable to open a world-class facility to this family and provide care at the highest level of expertise. Facial reanimation surgery is profoundly life-changing. For Eugene, it represents the possibility of expression, connection and a future he may never have imagined before. For Smile, it was also an invaluable opportunity for other surgeons to learn from such a rare and complex case, turning one surgery into the potential to help many more children like Eugene. We highly value the opportunity to work alongside Wits Donald Gordon Medical Centre on cases such as this and look forward to helping many more children together.”

While these procedures are performed in highly specialised centres globally, access to this level of care remains limited in South Africa due to the advanced infrastructure, multidisciplinary expertise and years of specialised training required to perform them successfully.

For WDGMC, however, the ability to perform these surgeries forms part of a broader commitment to advancing highly specialised care within South Africa’s healthcare system while simultaneously strengthening academic medicine and specialist training.

As an academic hospital affiliated with the University of the Witwatersrand, WDGMC has become an important training environment for complex reconstructive microsurgery in South Africa. The hospital recently established the country’s first reconstructive microsurgery fellowship programme for qualified plastic surgeons, helping expand the number of specialists capable of performing these highly technical procedures.

“We have a responsibility not only to perform these surgeries, but to transfer the skill,” says Dr Liakos. “If we do not train future microsurgeons, access to this level of specialised care will remain limited.”

According to Dr Liakos, successful reconstructive microsurgery depends not only on surgical expertise but on building the right multidisciplinary environment around patients.

“To do these cases successfully, you need a dedicated team and an environment that functions seamlessly,” he explains. “Microsurgery is never a one-person effort. It is the nursing staff, anaesthetists, theatre teams and systems around you that make these outcomes possible.”

For surgeons working in the field, the impact of reconstructive microsurgery extends far beyond the operating theatre.

“These surgeries can take 10 or 12 hours. They are physically and emotionally demanding,” says Dr Liakos. “But when you step back and realise that what you are doing may change the course of a person’s life forever, it gives meaning to every moment spent in theatre.”

As WDGMC continues to build on its reconstructive microsurgery programme and the country’s first fellowship of its kind, the hospital is helping shape a future in which South African patients can access world-class reconstructive care close to home and in which the specialists capable of providing that care are trained locally.

Categories : Expert Opinion Lab Tests and ImagingTags :

Provinces Owe the NHLS Billions, Patients Could Pay the Price. It’s Time to Crack the Whip

On By ModernMedia
Through its countrywide network of quality-assured diagnostic laboratories, the NHLS is the sole provider of diagnostic pathology services to over 80% of the South African population. Photo by National Cancer Institute on Unsplash

Comment & Analysis

By Faith Muthambi

Provincial debt to the National Health Laboratory Service is not just a financial governance matter, but also a public healthcare service delivery risk that affects diagnoses, treatment, disease surveillance, and government’s ability to protect vulnerable patients, writes Faith Muthambi, chairperson of the Portfolio Committee on Health in the National Assembly.

When *Lungile Mbonambi, a hypothetical healthcare user, waits for a blood test at a public hospital, she is not thinking about all the zeros in provincial budgets or intergovernmental disputes. She is thinking about her health. Like some 80% of people in South Africa, she places her trust in the public healthcare system, the inner workings of which she will never see, and in laboratory professionals she will likely never meet. However, in using the system, she experiences its impact.

For her blood test, a nurse will draw the sample, seal the vial and send it to the closest National Health Laboratory Service (NHLS) facility. For patients, waiting for the results often feels uneasy and ridden with dread. In addition to the immediate health concern, patients also find themselves in the hands of a system that needs to function well, not only on paper and in policy, but also in the concrete reality of their particular case.

The NHLS plays a big role in public health in South Africa through epidemiology, surveillance and responding to public health outbreaks. Among other things, it is involved in HIV and TB programmes, conducting diagnostic tests for non-communicable diseases, and the screening for cervical cancer. In essence, contemporary healthcare would grind to a halt without the robust laboratory infrastructure that the NHLS provides.

Ballooning debt

Just recently at the end of May, the Portfolio Committee on Health in Parliament, which is tasked with overseeing the National Department of Health, met with representatives from the NHLS and all nine provincial health departments. The meeting revealed that outstanding debt to the NHLS had climbed to an imposing R11 billion as of March this year. Most of this debt stemmed from KwaZulu-Natal with around R3.94 billion, and Gauteng with roughly R3.3 billion, both of which include debt from previous years.

This meeting confirmed what many in the public health system have warned about for years. This outstanding debt is not merely a matter of the numbers not adding up, but is symptomatic of a serious failure in financial governance. Failing to pay or delaying payments for critical services already rendered to the public health system also reflects poor coordination among government departments and entities.

The consequences of this can be dire.

For the NHLS, without these funds, the institution cannot sustain research, do proper disease surveillance, detect outbreaks or monitor antimicrobial resistance, or upgrade equipment. When a laboratory cannot replace ageing instruments on time, fill critical posts, modernise information technology or plan procurement with certainty, it is felt in hospitals and clinics.

For patients, it means delayed diagnoses and disrupted care, and those living in rural and under-resourced communities often bear the brunt.

Time to act

Listening to presentations from all nine provincial health departments showed that this crisis can be prevented. There are provinces that are getting this right and paying their invoices to the NHLS within the required 30-day period. This shows that, even with budget constraints, laboratory services can be prioritised.

As Chairperson of the Portfolio Committee on Health, I have made it clear that it is now time to shift our oversight from concern to action that leads to actual consequences for those provinces that fail to pay their NHLS debts.

There had been instances in the past where National Treasury intervened by withholding or redirecting funds when provinces failed to fulfil their responsibilities. The committee may need to engage the National Treasury on ways to protect funding for laboratory services, including the possibility of direct transfers or ring-fenced funding where provinces fail to prioritise their obligations to the NHLS. The message is clear: We cannot allow a situation in which a province destabilises another public institution by failing to pay for services central to healthcare provision.

Our next step cannot be to just accept more vague commitments and assurances that the debt will be paid. Provinces with outstanding debt must provide clear repayment plans linked to strict timelines, while continuing to pay current invoices within the required period. The committee will request quarterly progress reports on payments made to reduce the debt, as well as on actions taken against officials involved in this non-payment.

We live in an era marked by emerging health threats and increasing demands on health services. It is therefore important to remind ourselves that health systems do not collapse overnight. They deteriorate gradually through deferred payments and normalised delays, among other things. By the time patients experience the full impact, the horse may have already bolted because we ignored the warning signs.

To be clear – this, here, is a serious warning sign.

Yet notwithstanding these pressures, laboratory professionals continue to demonstrate extraordinary commitment. Samples are being processed, and results are verified. I commend these public servants who work beyond ordinary expectations to protect the service. However, we cannot bank on this devotion to become a permanent substitute for responsible governance.

The decision before us is whether we allow patients’ experience of the public health value chain between health facilities and NHLS laboratories to continue to be determined by delay and uncertainty, or by a public health system that understands the seriousness of its responsibilities and acts accordingly.

Patients like Mbonambi are placing their trust in the state. We must do better.

*Muthambi is a Member of the National Assembly and Chairperson of the Portfolio Committee on Health.

Note: Spotlight aims to deepen public understanding of important health issues by publishing a variety of views on its opinion pages. The views expressed in this article are not necessarily shared by the Spotlight editors.

Republished from Spotlight under a Creative Commons licence.

Read the original article.

Categories : VaccinesTags :

New Shingles Vaccine to Be Launched in SA Private Sector, but Affordability May Limit Access

On By ModernMedia
A more effective vaccine against shingles – an often painful and debilitating condition caused by the same virus that causes chickenpox – will soon be available in South Africa’s private sector. Photo by Mufid Majnun on Unsplash

By Marcus Low and Catherine Tomlinson

Ten years after its launch in the United States, a new, more effective shingles vaccine is finally set to hit the market in South Africa. While the vaccine, called Shingrix, should soon be available at private sector pharmacies, it seems unlikely that it will be provided in the country’s public healthcare system any time soon.

A more effective shingles vaccine is finally set to hit the market in South Africa. Shingles is a common and painful condition that mostly affects the elderly and people with weakened immune systems. It generally appears with a telltale red rash and cluster of red blisters on one side of one’s body, often in a band-like pattern.

“Shingles is pretty awful to get – it’s extremely painful, and some people can get strokes, vision loss, deafness and other horrible manifestations as complications,” infectious disease specialist Professor Jeremy Nel previously told Spotlight. “Shingles really is something to avoid, if at all possible.”

One way to prevent the viral infection, is to get vaccinated against it. Unfortunately, getting hold of shingles vaccines have been a challenge in South Africa.

A vaccine called Zostavax, from the pharmaceutical company MSD, was approved by South Africa’s medicines regulator in 2011, but taken off the market here in 2024. It was only around 50% effective at preventing shingles.

A more effective vaccine, called Shingrix, was introduced by GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) in the United States in 2016. Shingrix is estimated to be around 90% effective in preventing shingles.

But, as Spotlight reported last year, access to Shingrix in South Africa has been severely constrained. That was partly because the vaccine had not been registered by the South African Health Products Regulatory Authority (SAHPRA). Because of this, the only way to get the vaccine in the country was via a Section 21 application – a mechanism in the Medicines Act that allows for the limited importation of unregistered medicines.

That situation changed earlier this month when Shingrix was registered by SAHPRA, thus opening the door for the jab to be imported at scale and sold at pharmacies.

“GSK’s vaccine against shingles (herpes zoster) is expected to be available in South Africa by the end of June 2026,” a GSK spokesperson told Spotlight this week.

It will be launched at a price of R2 783 per dose, including VAT. The total price charged by pharmacies will be slightly higher due to extras like the cost of administration.

Shingrix vaccination requires two doses administered two to six months apart. Since Shingrix is a schedule 4 product, you will need a prescription from a doctor to get it. (You can see more technical details about the vaccine as released by SAHPRA here.)

What about public sector access? 

After a vaccine is registered by SAHPRA, the next step on the road to potential public sector access is typically for that vaccine to be considered by the National Advisory Group on Immunisation (NAGI). NAGI then makes a recommendation to the National Department of Health on whether or not the vaccine should be procured for the public sector.

“The decision for the public health sector to offer any vaccine, including Shingrix, is based on the recommendations by NAGI, which considers a number of factors, including availability of [the] registered health product, effectiveness and safety, operational feasibility, alignment with public health priorities, and whether sufficient funding is available,” Foster Mohale, spokesperson for the National Department of Health, told Spotlight.

He said the department has not yet received NAGI’s assessment outcomes and recommendations regarding Shingrix.

It seems likely that an asking price of over R2 000 per dose will be considered unaffordable for the public sector. That said, the price will have to be weighed up against the savings that will result from fewer people developing shingles and requiring treatment.

Spotlight asked GSK whether the company has engaged with the health department regarding the potential supply of Shingrix to the public sector and what price they might offer the government (the department of health often procures medicines at lower prices than what is asked in the private sector).

A GSK spokesperson responded: “As Shingrix is expected to become available in South Africa by the end of June 2026, we anticipate its initial introduction within the private sector. GSK is open to relevant discussions regarding the availability of this vaccine in the public sector.”

What about medical scheme coverage?

For now, it is unclear to what extent medical schemes in South Africa will cover the jab.

“For a vaccine to be considered for funding by the medical scheme, it must be registered with SAHPRA, have a valid NAPPI code, and be commercially available in South Africa,” Dr  Noluthando Nematswerani, Chief Clinical Officer at Discovery Health, told Spotlight.

Nematswerani pointed out that Shingrix is not yet commercially available in the country. Spotlight received her comments on 25 June 2026.

When Shingrix does become commercially available, that is to say when it’s available in pharmacies, it seems likely that at least some medical scheme members will be able to access it using their medical savings accounts.

“Discovery Health Medical Scheme funds vaccines that are registered with SAHPRA from the member’s available Medical Savings Account (MSA) on plans that include an MSA benefit,” said Nematswerani.

“Until Shingrix becomes commercially available locally, Discovery Health Medical Scheme members can only access Shingrix via a Section 21 authorisation process. Medicines accessed under Section 21 are treated as a general scheme exclusion and are therefore not funded from scheme benefits,” she said.

Who should get the vaccine?

As we previously reported, South Africa does not have guidelines regarding who should receive the shingles vaccine and when they should receive it. The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends that all adults over 50 receive the two-dose Shingrix vaccine. They also recommend that people whose immune systems can’t defend their body as effectively as it should, like those living with HIV, should get the vaccine starting from age 19.

In March 2025, the World Health Organization (WHO) recommended that countries where shingles is an important public health problem consider the two-dose shingles vaccine for older adults and people with chronic conditions.

“The vaccine is highly effective and licensed for adults aged 50 years and older, even if they’ve had shingles before,” according to the WHO. It advised countries to look at how much the vaccine costs compared to the benefits before deciding to use it.

Republished from Spotlight under a Creative Commons licence.

Read the original article.

Categories : TransplantsTags :

New Liver Perfusion Technology Marks a Breakthrough for Transplant Care in South Africa at Wits Donald Gordon Medical Centre

On By ModernMedia
L-R – Dr Bilal Bobat, Professor Jerome Loveland, Dr Sharan Rambarran and Dr Dinen Parbhoo, the transplant team at Wits Donald Gordon Medical Centre alongside the liver perfusion machine, the first of its kind to be implemented on the African continent.

Johannesburg, 12 June 2026: For a patient waiting for a liver transplant in South Africa, the hardest part is not the surgery. It is the wait and the knowledge that an organ may never come. In a country facing severe organ shortages, every decision to accept or decline a donor liver carries immense weight and every viable organ that goes unused represents a lost opportunity to save a life.

At the centre of changing this reality is the Wits Donald Gordon Medical Centre (WDGMC), home to one of the leading liver transplant programmes in Africa and a unit internationally recognised for its contribution to specialised transplant care, research and surgical training. Having performed over 1 000 liver transplants, the programme represents decades of expertise, innovation and collaboration.

Now, WDGMC, in partnership with Surgeons for Little Lives and with support from key corporate sponsor Weelee, has introduced a state-of-the-art liver perfusion machine, becoming the first transplant centre on the African continent to implement this technology for liver transplantation.

This technology keeps donor livers viable outside the body while clinicians assess, monitor and actively improve the condition of the organ before transplantation. By allowing transplant teams to better maintain organ viability, the machine has the potential to increase organ utilisation, reduce complications and improve transplant outcomes for patients who may otherwise not survive the wait.

“As a transplant programme, our responsibility extends far beyond the operating theatre,” says Professor Jerome Loveland, Head of Solid Organ Transplantation at WDGMC. “This technology will help us better assess donor organs and increase the number of livers that can safely be transplanted, whilst simultaneously improving results. In a country where every donor organ matters, this will have a significant impact on organ utility and patient outcomes.”

South Africa’s transplant programmes continue to achieve strong outcomes despite operating within a severely resource-constrained environment and against the backdrop of ongoing organ shortages. As a result, transplant teams are often required to make difficult decisions under significant pressure.

“This technology changes the level of information we have available before transplantation. Traditionally, organs are preserved on ice and assessment is limited. Machine perfusion allows us to monitor how the liver is functioning outside the body. Beyond the valuable information it provides, the machine has the ability to resuscitate the liver by delivering oxygen to the liver cells, creating the best metabolic environment outside the body. This helps us make more informed clinical decisions and potentially increases the number of organs that can safely be transplanted,” says Dr Sharan Rambarran, Transplant Surgeon at WDGMC.

The introduction of the machine is also expected to contribute to reduced post-operative complications, shorter hospital stays and improved recovery outcomes.

“Too many patients in South Africa deteriorate while waiting for a transplant because there are simply not enough donor organs available,” says Dr Bilal Bobat, Transplant Hepatologist at WDGMC. “Anything that helps us safely expand organ utilisation has the potential to directly impact survival and quality of life for patients and families facing end-stage liver disease.”

“Weelee is always looking for opportunities to contribute to causes that create real and lasting impact,” says Errol Levin, CEO of Weelee. “Supporting advancements in liver perfusion technology aligns perfectly with our commitment to innovation that improves lives. This ground-breaking initiative has the potential to save countless lives and we are proud to be associated with a project of such significance.”

WDGMC plays a unique role within South Africa’s healthcare system. As a private academic hospital affiliated with the University of the Witwatersrand, the Centre combines highly specialised clinical care with academic medicine and collaboration across both the private and public healthcare sectors.

While the technology represents an important advancement in liver transplantation, clinicians stress that increasing organ donation awareness remains critical to improving access to life saving transplants in South Africa.

For the transplant teams, this marks not only a clinical advancement but the beginning of a broader effort to continue strengthening transplant medicine in South Africa.

Categories : CancerTags :

Indigenous Plant Study Opens New Path in Cancer Treatment Research

On By ModernMedia
Prof. Chrisna Gouws and her team have been researching cancer bush for five years. Lessertia frutescens, commonly known as cancer bush.

by Phenyo Mokgothu

A plant long used in traditional medicine is now at the centre of research that could shape future cancer treatment options in South Africa and beyond.

Researchers at the North-West University(NWU) are investigating the anti-cancer potential of Lessertia frutescens, commonly known as cancer bush, after laboratory studies showed activity against several forms of cancer, including drug-resistant small cell lung cancer and colorectal cancer.

According to Prof Chrisna Gouws, a research professor in the Centre of Excellence for Pharmaceutical Sciences in the Faculty of Health Sciences, the research team tested extracts from the indigenous plant on cultured human cancer cells and more advanced laboratory-grown “mini-tumours” known as spheroids.

“Lessertia frutescens has shown significant anticancer activity against several different cancer types in our research,” she says.

Targeting cancers considered incurable

She says the findings became more important when the team observed activity in cancers that no longer respond to conventional treatment.

“What is very interesting and exciting is the apparent activity in drug-resistant cancers such as resistant small cell lung cancer where known chemotherapies have limited to no activity,” Prof. Gouws says.

“This provides us with new avenues to investigate for treatment options to treat cancers currently considered incurable.”

The research team said another factor attracting attention is the plant’s longstanding use in traditional medicine and its safety profile.

“An important consideration is that this plant has a long history of use and is considered non-toxic and safe for use,” Prof. Gouws says.

“It’s anticancer activity comes without the significant side-effects known to occur with most standard chemotherapies.”

Other systems in the body may benefit

Researchers also found that the plant may support other systems in the body during treatment.

“Lessertia has known boosting effects for the digestive and immune systems, and it can have mood-enhancing activities as well,” she says.

“It may therefore not only target the cancer but positively impact the patient as a whole at the same time.”

The team is now studying the plant’s phytochemicals to identify the molecules responsible for the anticancer activity and understand how they work.

“Although many molecules have been identified and shown to contribute to the anticancer activity of the plant, the mechanism of action remains mostly unclear,” says Prof. Gouws.

“We are therefore delving deeper now to try and understand how and why this plant works.”

The next phase of the study will include animal model testing later this year to confirm safety and efficacy before future clinical trials can be considered.

At the same time, the researchers are developing a complementary medicine product that may be available in pharmacies by 2027.

Prof. Gouws says the project could also create economic opportunities.

“Chemotherapy can be very expensive and inaccessible in rural areas. A new plant-based treatment will be much more cost-effective and may be more accessible because it can be manufactured locally,” she says. “An increase in demand for the plant material will also create economic opportunities through farming.”

More about Prof Chrisna Gouws

Prof Gouws leads the strategic project for Human-Based New Approach Methodologies for Biomedical Research. She holds a PhD in biochemistry and has more than 15 years’ experience in utilising cell culture-based models for human health and disease research, including developing new complex in vitro models for applications in drug research, including traditional medicinal remedies and plant materials for cancer treatment.

She is the founder and executive committee chair for the Society for Advanced Cell Culture Modelling for Africa, a board member of International Microphysiological Systems Society, and co-editor of the NAM Journal.

Source: North-West University

Categories : Ethics and LawTags :

Fake Medicines: How Regulators Are Trying to Fix the Problem in SA

On By ModernMedia

By Elna Schütz

From unregulated weight loss injections to unsafe pain tablets, substandard and falsified medical products pose a threat to the health of people. Spotlight reports on how regulators are fighting the problem in South Africa.

“I know that there is a risk, but at this point I feel that the benefits outweigh everything else,” says Anna*, who buys unregulated medicine on the black market.  

She was prescribed GLP-1 RA medicines by a doctor after being tested for insulin resistance. She has lost around 30kg and says the positive impact on her body, life, and self-esteem has been massive. GLP1 RAs (Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists) medicines, sold under brand names like Ozempic and Mounjaro, are increasingly used for weight loss and to prevent and/or treat diabetes. 

When global shortages affected GLP-1 RA stocks in local pharmacies, Anna started buying similar drugs directly from unregistered sellers. For around R1 650, a fancy-looking box with a three-month supply of injections is delivered to her in a small cooler box. “I knew then already that what I was buying was unregulated and potentially inferior or even dangerous,” she says, adding, “but I was finally starting to feel good about myself.”  

Apart from being aware that the unregulated drugs could potentially harm her, Anna says she found that the regulated products were often out of stock, expensive, and came with stigma from pharmacists who quizzed her on whether she deserved the products. “If I could have kept doing it the proper way, I would have, but there were just too many obstacles,” she says. 

Defining the problem  

Weight-loss medicines are only one of several types of health products that are frequently purchased outside of formal channels, according to the South African Health Products Regulatory Authority (SAHPRA).  

“Commonly affected products include painkillers, antibiotics, weight-loss and sexual enhancement products, skin-lightening products, and some chronic medicines,” Mokgadi Fafudi, SAHPRA’s manager of regulatory compliance, tells Spotlight. 

“Combating the threat of substandard and falsified medical products is one of the urgent global challenges of this decade,” says Faridun Nazriev, the external relations and communications officer at the World Health Organization (WHO) Country Office in South Africa. 

“Substandard products are those that do not meet quality standards and specifications, often due to poor manufacturing practices or inadequate quality control. Falsified medical products deliberately misrepresent their identity, composition or source”, according to the WHO. These products, it adds, are often created and distributed with the intent to deceive consumers for financial gain. 

Two other definitions should not be confused with these, cautions Dr Andy Gray, a senior lecturer in Pharmacology at UKZN and co-director of the WHO Collaborating Centre for Pharmaceutical Policy and Evidence-Based Practice. 

Compounded medicines are custom formulations that may be specific to a patient, but are generally not registered by SAHPRA.  

Generic medicines are those that have been tested and found to be as safe and effective as originator medicines, but are generally cheaper. Generic medicines on the market have been approved by SAHPRA and are not in any way substandard. 

Gray says the term counterfeit is no longer used by the WHO, because it refers specifically to breaches of intellectual property, like trademarks. 

Lack of data 

While the WHO estimates that 1 in 10 medicines in low-and middle-income countries are substandard or falsified, all regions are affected and have been seeing an increase, according to a 2024 report from the WHO’s Global Surveillance and Monitoring System. 

South Africa also appears to have rising rates. SAHPRA’s 2021/2022 annual report notes that 101 health product quality complaint reports were filed. In 2022/23, that figure nearly tripled to 297. 

Fafudi says that the organisation received 588 reports of possible non-compliance in the 2024/2025 year. She says that for the 2025/26 year, this number exceeds 570 cases, though this has not yet been published by SAHPRA.  

But such reports are likely only the tip of the iceberg. Gray laments that we don’t have the full picture of how big the problem of substandard and falsified medical products really is. 

This is partly because, by its very nature, the sale of substandard and falsified medicines is usually hidden. Fafudi says that these medicines are often sold through informal markets, unregulated outlets, online platforms, and cross-border smuggling networks.

Gray adds that these medications aren’t necessarily always sold through informal means. “They may be infiltrated into wholesalers or state medicine depots, and then distributed,” he says, “Or they may be sold directly to pharmacies or prescribers and then sold to patients.” 

A threat to patients 

As in Anna’s experience with GLP-1 RAs, there is often a demand for unregulated products because the properly regulated products can’t meet the public demand. 

Fentse Maseko, who works in the Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacy at Wits University, researched this issue in her Master’s thesis and advocates in the space. She notes that in many low- and middle-income countries, particularly in remote and underserved areas, limited access to medicines may force patients to seek treatment from informal markets. She adds that in South Africa, porous borders and rising costs also play a role. 

Whatever the reasons behind their proliferation, the risks to the healthcare system and individuals are multi-faceted.

“Substandard and falsified medicines are a serious threat to patient safety and public trust,” says Refiloe Mogale, the executive director for the Pharmaceutical Society of South Africa (PSSA). “These products can lead to treatment failure, harm, or even death.” 

Maseko warns that it can also add to the growing problem of antibiotic resistance if antibiotics are substandard. It can also strain the healthcare system when second or third-line treatments are needed for issues initially addressed with unregulated products, or caused by them.  

The role of the regulator 

The main body in South Africa responsible for regulating substandard and falsified medicines is SAHPRA. Fafudi explains that they conduct post-market surveillance and inspections, run a whistleblower reporting system, manage product recalls, and monitor illegal advertising and online sales.  

SAHPRA also works with specialised units in the South African Police Service as well as other stakeholders such as customs to enforce joint operations. Fafudi says such joint operations have been conducted on at least a monthly basis. 

There are also legal actions, including issuing warnings, seizing or destroying products and criminal prosecution. According to the Medicines and Related Substances Act 101 of 1965, fines or prison sentences not exceeding 10 years may be prescribed. 

The PSSA however charges that not enough is being done. “Key gaps are visible in insufficient regulatory capacity, weak border control, limited enforcement scale and the under-resourced National Action Plan,” Mogale says. “The system is overwhelmed by the speed and sophistication of the problem.” 

Reporting unregulated products 

The public can help address the problem of substandard and falsified medicines. SAHPRA advises buying only from licensed and authorised pharmacies and healthcare providers.

“Be cautious of unusually low prices, miracle cure claims, and poor packaging,” Fafudi warns. “Always check packaging, expiry dates, and consult healthcare professionals before use.” 

Suspicious products or sellers can be reported on the SAHPRA website. 

Jas Bhana, Chief Executive Officer of the Innovative Pharmaceutical Association of South Africa, adds that the public can also report suspicious products to the National Department of Health or their nearest pharmacy. “Combating this threat requires collective vigilance to safeguard every patient’s right to safe, quality, and effective medicines,” she says.  

This goes hand-in-hand with the need for consumers to know the dangers, Maseko explains. “While public education plays an important role in mitigating this risk, effective risk communication remains a challenge, particularly in communities with limited health literacy,” says Maseko. 

On a bigger scale, Nazriev explains that the WHO prioritises prevention, detection, and response as the main pillars of action. This includes local regulation as well as collaboration between countries.  

“Given the transnational nature of globalised medical product supply chains as well as criminal networks, collaborating across borders and sectors is essential to national, regional and global responses,” he says.  

Better regulation 

Gray acknowledges that there is a challenge in budgets and laboratory capacity, but even so he calls for more to be done. “SAHPRA needs to move from a largely reactive stance to a more proactive one, sampling medicines from the distribution chain and submitting them for checking, and then report to the public on their findings,” he suggests. 

The PSSA recommends implementing a national medicine registry with a track-and-trace system and stricter control of online medicine sales, including mandatory certification and monitoring. 

SAHPRA is already planning along some of these lines. “Future plans include strengthening supply chain traceability, enhancing detection systems, regulating online medicine sales, and increasing public awareness campaigns,” says Fafudi.  

Part of this direction comes from a National Action Plan (NAP), launched late last year by SAHPRA, with support from the National Department of Health and the WHO. 

“All actors within the supply chain, particularly at key pinch points in both the public and private sectors, must be equipped with the knowledge, skills, and equipment to identify and report suspicious products to SAHPRA,” Health Minister Dr Aaron Motsoaledi is reported to have said at the launch of the NAP. “All activities should mitigate the risk of substandard and falsified medical products. This includes increased vigilance at ports of entry, through to post-market surveillance of high-risk products, inspection of manufacturers, distributors and wholesalers.” 

Whether all this will be done, and what it will mean for people like Anna who knowingly choose to use unregulated medicines, remains to be seen. 

*Not her real name 

Republished from Spotlight under a Creative Commons licence.

Read the original article.

Categories : PaediatricsTags :

New Study Finds Many Neonatal Deaths in SA Are Preventable

On By ModernMedia

New post-portem study reveals over 80% of infection-related neonatal deaths in South Africa are preventable.

Photo by William Fortunato on Pexels

A groundbreaking study published in The Lancet Infectious Diseases Journal has identified that the vast majority of neonatal (newborn infant in the first 28 days of life) deaths caused by infections in South Africa and other low-and-middle-income countries could be prevented through improved clinical care and targeted medical interventions. The research, conducted by the Child Health and Mortality Prevention Surveillance (CHAMPS) network, utilised innovative post-mortem techniques that enables accurate identification of causes of death in low-resource settings. To provide the most granular look to date at what is killing newborns in these regions, more than 2600 neonatal deaths were analysed using minimally invasive tissue sampling (MITS).

The study, titled “Post-mortem characterisation of pathogen-specific causes of infection-related deaths in African and south Asian neonates: a prospective, observational, multicentre study which included a major surveillance site in Soweto, South Africa”, has revealed that infections are involved in 44% of neonatal deaths across multiple sites in Africa and South Asia, underscoring an urgent need to strengthen infection prevention, diagnosis, and treatment strategies. Crucially, an expert panel determined that over 80% of these infection-related deaths were preventable under current or improved facility-based conditions.

Key Findings for South Africa:

  • Dominant Hospital Pathogens: In South Africa, Acinetobacter baumannii was the overwhelming driver of hospital-acquired infections, contributing to 74.3% of presumed hospital-acquired neonatal deaths.
  • Community-Acquired Threats: Group B Streptococcus (GBS) was identified as the leading cause of community-acquired neonatal deaths in South Africa, accounting for 30.6% of such cases, followed by Escherichia coli at 24.7%.
  • Emerging Fungal Risks: South Africa was the only site to report specific life-threatening fungal infections, including Candidozyma auris and Nakaseomyces glabratus, in the causal pathway to death.
  • Preventability: The modifiable factors identified to reduce these deaths include improvements in infection prevention and control (50.8%), clinical care (50.7%), and antenatal and obstetric care (42.2%).

The findings reveal that current empirical antibiotic treatments may be insufficient, particularly in high-burden settings where antimicrobial resistance is rising. The study also shows that infections often occur alongside other conditions such as prematurity and birth complications, indicating that neonatal deaths are driven by multiple, interconnected factors.

 “These findings indicate an urgent need to review empirical antibiotic treatment for neonatal infections,” said Prof Shabir A. Madhi, Director of the South African Medical Research Council Vaccines and Infectious Diseases Analytics Research (Wits VIDA) Unit and lead author of the study. “The high prevalence of multidrug-resistant pathogens like K. pneumoniae and A. baumannii suggests our current standard protocols may no longer be sufficient. Alarmingly, some of these bacteria are resistant to all classes of antibiotics currently available.”

Nearly half of all deaths in children under five occur in the neonatal period, with the highest burden in Africa and South Asia. Importantly, local data further underscores the urgency of action. Within the Soweto and Thembelihle surveillance population, the neonatal mortality rate is estimated at 16.0 deaths per 1000 live births, significantly higher than both South Africa’s national estimate of 10 per 1000 and the Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 2030 target of 12 per 1000 live births.

These findings highlight persistent inequalities in maternal and child health outcomes, even within urban settings, and reinforce the need for targeted, evidence-based interventions.

The MITS technique used at Wits VIDA uses needle biopsies rather than full autopsies to collect biological specimens. This method proved far more effective than traditional antemortem diagnostics, which failed to identify a pathogen in up to 73% of suspected sepsis cases in South Africa.

The study provides one of the most comprehensive, pathogen-specific analyses of neonatal deaths to date and ultimately, the study highlights a powerful opportunity. That most infection-related neonatal deaths are preventable. The CHAMPS consortium concludes that prioritising new maternal vaccines and strengthening hospital infection control are essential steps to reducing the high burden of neonatal mortality.

CHAMPS South Africa consistently shares its granular research findings with the National Department of Health (NDoH) through various channels to ensure this detailed evidence assists in developing targeted strategies to prevent neonatal infections. These data, which provide a precise look at the pathogens responsible for mortality, are intended to help the NDoH refine empirical antibiotic protocols and strengthen hospital infection control measures. Beyond policy-level engagement, CHAMPS collaborates with local communities to raise awareness regarding prevention strategies, specifically emphasizing the importance of early antenatal care booking and consistent attendance. By focusing on these modifiable factors, the initiative seeks to improve obstetric care and reduce the number of babies born “too soon or too small,” addressing the preterm birth complications that frequently underlie neonatal deaths.

 About CHAMPS: The Child Health and Mortality Prevention Surveillance (CHAMPS) network is a global collaboration funded by The Gates Foundation. It aims to provide accurate data on the causes of childhood death to inform policy and save lives in high-mortality regions.

Link to the study in The Lancet Infectious Diseases Journal.

Source: Wits University