While grandmothers today have a popular image of spoiling their grandchildren with treats, in premodern times they also acted as healthcare providers. To find out more, University of Turku researchers looked at historical data on childhood mortality from infectious diseases in the 18th and 19th century in Finland. The study, which is published in the journal Proceedings of the Royal Society B, found that grandmothers decreased all-cause and cause-specific mortality of children.
In historical and in several contemporary societies, children with living grandmothers are more likely to survive into adulthood, but the mechanism behind this effect remains poorly known.
As childhood infections have been a leading cause of death in children under the age of 5 years, the researchers aimed to investigate whether the effect of grandmothers on childhood survival was related to providing knowledge in childcare, particularly during critical times such as epidemics. One way for grandmothers to do so could be by encouraging vaccine uptake or earlier vaccination against childhood infections, as has been observed in some contemporary populations.
Researchers first studied the effects of grandmothers on children’s cause-specific mortality, using historical records of five causes of death: smallpox, measles, pulmonary infections, diarrhoeal deaths, and accidents. The large multigenerational dataset of pre-industrial Finnish families included 9705 individuals from 12 parishes across Finland, where the survival of individuals until the of age 15 years was monitored from 1761 to 1900. In the second part of the study, the researchers determined whether increased survival against the childhood infection smallpox was mediated by vaccination. To this end, they used 1594 vaccination records from two rural parishes and matched them to their individual family histories.
The results show that grandmothers decreased all-cause mortality, an effect which was mediated through improved survival from smallpox, pulmonary and diarrhoeal infections, but not from measles or accidents. However, the researchers found no evidence of increased or earlier vaccination between children with or without grandmothers.
“Our results show that the grandmother’s presence protected against some childhood infections, which could indicate that in historical Finnish society, the assistance provided by grandmothers in childcare was likely an important factor in ensuring the survival of children,” says study lead author, Doctoral Researcher Susanna Ukonaho.
Grandmothers in contemporary societies
Although grandmother care provided health benefits in many historical societies, these benefits may no longer be relevant in contemporary societies. The progress in healthcare during the 20th century especially in high-income countries likely decreased the role of grandmothers. However, some studies indicate that grandmothers improve childhood survival in several contemporary middle- and low-income countries.
“The type of benefits that grandmothers provide may vary depending on cultural contexts and individual circumstances. Even though in many societies grandmothers are no longer essential for childhood survival, their efforts in childcare remain valuable for the well-being of the whole family,” says Ukonaho.
“The death of a child affects us all. Witnessing the loss of a newborn baby who has sepsis is terribly traumatic, especially so when antibiotics used to treat the child are ineffective,” says neonatologist Professor Sithembiso Velaphi.
“It’s very heavy for a mother to carry her baby, give birth, watch as her newborn gets seriously sick from infection, suffers while being pricked with drips and pumped with drugs to try and save the child – only for her to leave the hospital empty handed. It’s painful,” says Velaphi, who is the head of Paediatrics at Chris Hani Baragwanath Academic Hospital in Johannesburg.
Professor Sithembiso Velaphi, head of Paediatrics at Chris Hani Baragwanath Academic Hospital in Johannesburg. PHOTO: Kim Cloete for GARDP
Nurses and doctors feel sad and crushed too when they cannot save a newborn’s life because of antibiotic resistance to bacterial infections. “We need to prioritise the development of antibiotics to treat these babies. For us, success is seeing a baby get better and going home,” he says.
Velaphi was speaking to Spotlight about a landmark global observational study published in the journal Plos Medicine (June 8) which found that many neonates (within 60 days of birth) get life-threatening bloodstream infections, or sepsis, and are dying because the antibiotics used to treat them are not effective. This is the first global overview to assess the extent of the problem. Spotlight last year reported on interim findings from the same study.
The study, called NeoOBS, led by the Global Antibiotic Research and Development Partnership (GARDP) recruited more than 3 200 babies in 19 hospitals in 11 countries – South Africa, Kenya, Uganda, Thailand, Vietnam, India, Greece, Italy, Bangladesh, Brazil, and China.
The researchers reported great variability in mortality rates of babies with sepsis across the 19 hospitals, ranging from 1% to 27.3%.
Sepsis affects up to 3 million babies a year globally. Importantly, the study’s 80 authors estimate that 214 000 newborns die every year from sepsis that has become antibiotic resistant, and this is mostly in low- to middle-income countries (LMIC). Many survivors suffer from neurodevelopmental problems. Treatment options have become increasingly limited as about 40% of infections are reported to be resistant to standard antibiotic treatments.
Many infections acquired in hospital
Almost 60% of infection-related deaths were due to infections acquired at the 19 hospitals under review. Klebsiella pneumoniae was the most common pathogen isolated.
Of the 40 antibiotics approved for use in adults since 2000, only four have included dosing information for neonates in their labelling. Currently, 43 adult antibiotic clinical trials are recruiting patients, compared to only six trials recruiting neonates, researchers say.
New antibiotic treatments are urgently needed, especially in LMICs where almost 1 in 5 babies with sepsis died. Premature babies are particularly vulnerable to infections because of their immature immune systems.
More than 200 different antibiotic combinations were used by hospitals included in the NeoOBS study, with repeated switching of antibiotics due to high resistance to treatments. This showed a pattern of limited use of the World Health Organization’s recommended first-line treatment.
Many doctors have had to opt for last-line antibiotics such as carbapenems because of the high degree of antibiotic resistance in their units or because they were the only treatment available.
Outlining various challenges, Velaphi says the risk of infections is very high in hospital settings where there is often a shortage of nurses, beds, and space between patients making it difficult to stop the spread of infection. Chris Hani Baragwanath has an 18-bed Intensive Care Unit (ICU) that is almost always full and when the situation is desperate there is a spillover of patients into the high-care area. The pressure on the facility is huge and the influx of people from other countries has made it even more challenging, he says.
“There is a major problem of infection control, specifically related to high-risk babies – sick babies with complications who need interventions such as drips and even surgery. This increases the chances of infection. “More than 70% of all deaths ascribed to prematurity at the hospital were due to hospital-acquired multi-drug resistant infections,” he says.
The NeoSep 1 trial
The authors say the NeoOBS study has yielded “a wealth of high-quality data” needed to design trials for much-needed and appropriate treatments for sepsis in babies. Encouragingly, and building on from the observational study the first global hospital-based neonatal sepsis trial called NeoSep 1 is underway in Kenya and South Africa. Chris Hani Baragwanath is taking part in the trial together with Tygerberg Hospital in Cape Town and KEMRI, Kilifi County Hospital in Kenya. It’s planned that the trial will be expanded to other countries and regions in 2024 with the aim of recruiting 3 000 newborns.
A Personalised Randomised Controlled Trial (PRACTical) design will be used. According to GARDP and partners the design is a new way of comparing antibiotic treatments for neonatal sepsis. In addition, doctors can choose treatment regimens that are likely to work well for newborns in their specific hospital settings.
Researchers say the development pipeline for new antibiotic treatments is limited and the lack of a universal, effective standard of care creates huge challenges in conducting research to tackle neonatal sepsis. The PRACTical design has been specifically developed to address these challenges in important public health emergencies such as neonatal sepsis. (You can read more about how this type of trial works in the Lancet.)
The trial will compare the safety and efficacy of three new combinations of older antibiotics (fosfomycin-amikacin, flomoxef-amikacin, and flomoxef-fosfomycin) against the current standard of care. It will also assess and validate the doses of two antibiotics (fosfomycin and flomoxef) for use in newborns. The trial will also evaluate new combinations of generic antibiotics.
“We are hoping the trial will provide robust evidence that the antibiotic combinations are safe and effective and that this will lead to a change in both WHO and local treatment guidelines,” says Christina Obiero, Principal Investigator for the NeoSep1 trial for KEMRI at Kilifi County Hospital in a statement.
Severity and recovery scores
Principal Investigator for the NeoSep1 trial at Tygerberg Hospital, Professor Adrie Bekker tells Spotlight, “We have so few antibiotics that work effectively against these very sick babies. And even for those that we have, we are still not 100% sure how to dose these drugs to get accurate concentrations in the blood and to also make sure that the outcomes in these babies are as good as can be. This trial will help give us confidence that we are delivering more effective treatment.”
Bekker who is also Professor in the Division of Neonatology, Department of Paediatrics and Child Health at Stellenbosch University says a positive outcome of the NeoOBS study is the development of two important tools which can be used in ICUs globally.
The first is the NeoSep Severity Score which is a compilation of common symptoms and signs that can occur in a baby with clinical sepsis. The second is the NeoSep Recovery Score, which will assist clinicians in deciding if they can stop antibiotics earlier.
The tools are expected to help prevent the often excessive and inappropriate use of antibiotics for over too long a period, which compounds the problem of antibiotic resistance globally.
Diagnosis in older age groups, children, and adults, is generally easier.
“It’s sometimes difficult for a clinician to know whether a baby actually has neonatal sepsis because it can present very subtly and not always with the same symptoms,” Bekker explains.
The blood culture is the gold standard for diagnosing neonatal sepsis, but Bekker says only around 10% of blood cultures will grow an organism even if the baby has sepsis, making it very difficult to get a diagnosis. “And because it’s such an aggressive disease and a baby can die very quickly from it, clinicians tend to rather over-treat than under-treat. That is correct but, just as important as it is to start antibiotics quickly, it’s important to stop them if they are not necessary. The NeoSeps Severity score will help doctors identify babies that are at very high risk from sepsis and those that would need treatment immediately.
Velaphi says a major challenge is the time it takes for an outcome of the blood culture and the general protocol is to start antibiotics immediately. Waiting between 24 to 48 hours can be too late for a child who may have sepsis and could die. On the other hand, antibiotics may be given to children who do not have sepsis and this adds to the frequency of antibiotic resistance. “So, you are damned if you do and you are damned if you don’t.”
He says we need new diagnostic tests that are reliable and that have a high degree of sensitivity and specificity. “We need antibiotics that work to reduce mortality,” he adds.
The first drug therapy to slow the progression of nearsightedness in children is a step closer after the results of a successful clinical trial.
The results of the CHAMP (Childhood Atropine for Myopia Progression) trial were published in JAMA Ophthalmology. The three-year study found that a daily drop in each eye of a low dose of atropine, a drug used to dilate pupils, was better than a placebo at limiting eyeglass prescription changes and inhibiting elongation of the eye in nearsighted children aged six to 10.
About one in three adults worldwide is nearsighted, and the global prevalence of myopia is predicted to increase to 50% by 2050. Though one federally approved contact lens can slow progression of nearsightedness, no pharmaceutical products are approved in the US or Europe to treat myopia.
That elongation of the eyeball leads to myopia which starts in young children and progresses into the teen years before levelling off in most people. In addition to requiring life-long vision correction, nearsightedness increases the risk for retinal detachment, macular degeneration, cataracts and glaucoma later in life – and most corrective lenses don’t do anything to stop myopia progression.
“The idea of keeping eyeballs smaller isn’t just so people’s glasses are thinner – it would also be so that in their 70s they don’t suffer visual impairment,” said lead study author Karla Zadnik, professor and dean of the College of Optometry at The Ohio State University.
“This is exciting work for the myopia research community, which I’ve been part of for 35 years. We’ve talked about treatment and control for decades,” she said. “And it’s exciting to think that there could be options in the future for millions of children we know are going to be myopic.”
Animal studies years ago hinted at atropine’s ability to slow the growth of the eye, but the full-strength drug’s interference with near vision and concerns about pupil dilation hindered early considerations of its potential as a human therapy for myopia. More recent research has suggested a low dose of atropine might be the ticket.
This new double-masked, randomised phase 3 trial assessed the safety and effectiveness of two low-dose solutions, with atropine concentrations of either .01% or .02%, versus placebo. Treatment for each of the 489 children ages six to 10 assessed for the drug’s effectiveness consisted of one daily drop per eye at bedtime, which minimised the disruption of any blurring effects atropine might have on vision.
Researchers were a bit surprised to find that the most significant improvements at all time points compared to placebo resulted from the solution containing .01% of atropine. Though the .02% atropine formulation was also better at slowing progression of myopia than placebo, the results were less consistent.
“The .01% story is clearer and more obvious in terms of significantly slowing both the growth of the eye as well as then resulting in a lower glasses prescription,” Zadnik said.
Including a measure of the eye’s growth was a key component of the study because “the field is actually moving toward axial elongation being as important as, or more important than, the glasses prescription in terms of the most meaningful outcome,” she said. “If we’re trying to slow eye growth to prevent bad outcomes for people in their 80s, measuring the eye growth directly is really important.”
The drugs’ safety was assessed in a larger sample of 573 participants that also included children as young as 3 and up to age 16. Both low-dose formulations were safe and well tolerated. The most common side effects were sensitivity to light, allergic conjunctivitis, eye irritation, dilated pupils and blurred vision, although reports of these side effects were few.
The CHAMP trial was the first study of low-dose atropine to include placebo controls for three years and to involve a large, diverse population recruited from 26 clinical sites in North America and five countries in Europe. In a second section of the trial, researchers are evaluating how the eyes respond when the treatment is over.
Portable ultrasound devices could provide an alternative to x-ray machines for diagnosing forearm fractures in children, which could alleviate waiting times for families in hospital emergency departments (ED).
Griffith University researchers Professor Robert Ware and Senior Lecturer Peter Snelling compared functional outcomes in children given an ultrasound and those who received an x-ray on a suspected distal forearm fracture. Dr Snelling said the ultrasounds were performed by nurses, physiotherapists and emergency physicians at four south-east Queensland hospitals.
“They treated 270 children, aged between five and 15 years, during the randomised trial, which included a check-up 28 days later and another check-in at eight weeks,” Dr Snelling said. “The findings show the majority of children had similar recoveries and returned to full physical function.”
Less than one-third of children who were given an ultrasound needed a follow-up x-ray and care at an orthopaedic clinic. Those who didn’t have a buckle fracture or fractured arm were discharged from hospital without the need for further imaging.
Professor Ware said children who had an ultrasound initially had fewer x-rays, and shorter stays in the ED. “Families were also more satisfied with the treatment they received,” he said. “The results are promising and have wider implications beyond in hospital diagnosis and follow up care.
“By using a bedside ultrasound, this frees up the x-ray machine for patients who really need it and can potentially be a cost-cutting measure for hospitals as they reduce the number of x-rays without comprising the safety of patients.
“It also would be extremely beneficial in rural or remote areas eliminating the need for children and their families to travel to a larger hospital for an x-ray.”
As childhood obesity increases the world, children are entering puberty earlier and earlier – particularly girls. According to a survey, the onset of puberty occurs on average three months earlier for girls in every decade since 1977. Early, or precocious, puberty can leave children with psychological and social problems, as well leading to shorter adult heights. Studies also suggest that early puberty can increase the risk of developing cancer, diabetes, depression and cardiovascular disease later on in life.
While a scientific explanation has been lacking, the link between childhood obesity and early puberty has long been apparent. The more body fat a child has, the greater their likelihood of beginning puberty at an earlier age. Now, researchers have found what may be part of the answer in Drosphila fruit flies, publishing their results in Current Biology.
“Cholesterol is a fat. So, if you’re overweight, your body fat harbours more cholesterol. And it turns out that higher cholesterol is a key to earlier maturation in the fruit fly, our model organism. Our results demonstrate that the amount of cholesterol in adipose tissue and in certain support cells in the brain affects the growth of fruit flies and controls when they reach maturity,” explains Professor Kim Rewitz, a lead author of the study.
He adds, “And because the systems in fruit flies and humans are remarkably similar, we believe that the same may apply to humans – ie, that cholesterol in adipose tissue may help explain the connection between childhood obesity and early puberty.”
Puberty at ‘critical weight’
Professor Rewitz and the University of Copenhagen’s Department of Biology research team tested their hypothesis by putting fruit fly larvae on a “fatty diet” of cholesterol-packed foods. The development of these larvae was compared with larvae on a normal diet.
“We observed that larvae on the cholesterol diet consistently grew faster and entered ‘puberty’ sooner. It turned out that the increase of cholesterol stored in the fruit flies’ body fat and support cells in the brain increases the release of growth hormones that cause the animals to grow faster. Growth and size is a signal to the body for when to trigger puberty,” says Kim Rewitz.
The professor explains that in fruit flies, the signal to undergo maturation is when their weight and amount of body fat reach a certain point during development:
“In one way or another, animals need to know when they’re large enough to reach sexual maturity and be able to reproduce. Organisms have a checkpoint in their development that they must pass to enter puberty known as ‘Critical Weight’. This checkpoint is found in fruit flies and most likely in humans too. This means that both fruit fly larvae and children probably need to reach a certain body size and have a certain amount of fat stored to enter puberty. What we’ve found is that the amount of cholesterol stored in body fat plays an important role in this process.
“We see that fruit flies have a mechanism that senses how much cholesterol is stored in their body fat and support cells in the brain. At a certain point, the system then sends a signal to the brain centres that triggers maturation by producing steroid hormones. In humans, these correspond to testosterone and oestrogen.”
However, it also means that if the amount of stored cholesterol increases, the organism can actually fail to estimate its overall size accurately, so that it hits the critical weight checkpoint earlier than it normally would:
“Because overweight children have more body fat, they will probably also have stored more cholesterol at an earlier point in their development. So, if our assumption that the same mechanism exists in humans holds true, it could help to explain early puberty in obese children,” says the researcher.
Cholesterol may influence cancer as well
Professor Rewitz concludes that with part of the puzzle in hand, scientists can search for more clues and treatment. In the meantime, lifestyle changes remain the best solution for childhood obesity.
Professor Rewitz and his research colleagues have now started to look deeper into the significance of the cholesterol mechanism for cancer development. Their research also shows that, via the same mechanism, cholesterol can activate cell growth that leads to cancer.
A study that used data for 1.1 million children in Bavaria found that SARS-CoV-2 infection was linked to an increased risk of a diagnosis of type 1 diabetes. The findings, which are published in JAMA, also point to a direct effect of COVID on the development of type 1 diabetes.
Different studies have documented an increased incidence of type 1 diabetes during the COVID pandemic. However, none of the studies distinguishes between children with and without SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Researchers at Helmholtz Munich and TU Dresden, in cooperation with the Kassenärztliche Vereinigung Bayern (KVB) used a database to make an analysis of the temporal relationship between a COVID diagnosis and the diagnosis of type 1 diabetes. Amongst the analysed children without type 1 diabetes diagnosis before the start of the pandemic, 16.6% had a diagnosis of COVID between January 2020 and December 2021.
SARS-CoV-2 infection associated with an increased risk of type 1 diabetes in children
The researchers’ initial findings were consistent with data from Germany and other countries: the incidence rate of type 1 diabetes in children between the ages of two and 12 years was around 50% higher in the years 2020 to 2021 as compared to the incidence rate in 2018 to 2019. Important and novel, they found that the development of type 1 diabetes in 2020 to 2021 was higher in the children with COVID. The likelihood to develop type 1 diabetes was increased by 57% in children who had a confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection compared to non-infected children. The increase in type 1 diabetes incidence occurred in the same quarter as the COVID diagnosis and also in later quarters.
The new data point to a direct effect of SARS-CoV-2 infection on the development of type 1 diabetes
“We are cautious in our interpretation, but the findings suggest that the virus could either promote initiation of the underlying autoimmunity in type 1 diabetes or accelerate the progression of the disease in children with existing autoimmunity,” says Ezio Bonifacio, last author of the study. Further studies will be needed, to elucidate the exact mechanism driving the increased incidence of type 1 diabetes during the COVID pandemic in young children.
Further studies planned
The team of researchers also has access to cohorts of prospectively followed children from the Global Platform for the Prevention of Autoimmune Diabetes (GPPAD) and the Fr1da Study. “We want to look into these cohorts to see whether the development of islet autoantibodies and/or type 1 diabetes was increased in the children after SARS-CoV-2 infection,” says Anette-Gabriele Ziegler, Director of the Helmholtz Munich Institute of Diabetes Research and GPPAD researcher. The findings of these studies will help to determine whether vaccination against COVID should be considered in children at risk for type 1 diabetes.
In a new study published in Pediatric Investigation, researchers demonstrate that face masks reduce the release of exhaled particles when used by school-aged children, helping to slow the spread of various respiratory viruses. While there was little difference between no protection and masking in exhaled particles from breathing, sneezing saw a significant reduction in the number of particles produced.
Respiratory viruses, including SARS-CoV-2, are transmitted via respiratory droplets and aerosols generated by all activities that involve exhalation, including tidal breathing, speaking, singing, coughing, and sneezing. Droplets, large particles subject to gravitational forces, are rapidly deposited from air and form fomites on surfaces. Aerosols, fine solid or liquid particles which remain suspended in the air, can travel long distances (> 6m) and reach high concentrations in poorly-ventilated areas. The relative contribution of the various modes of infection (direct contact, indirect contact via fomite, large droplet, or aerosol) for various respiratory viruses is difficult to determine, but survival of infectious viruses has been demonstrated in aerosols.
For the study, 23 healthy children were asked to perform activities that ranged in intensity (breathe quietly, speak, sing, cough, and sneeze) while wearing no mask, a cloth mask, or a surgical mask.
The production of exhaled particles that were 5μm or smaller, which is the dominant mode of transmission of many respiratory viruses, increased with coughing and sneezing. Face masks, especially surgical face masks, effectively reduced the release of these and other sized particles.
“Understanding the factors that affect respiratory particle emission can guide public health measures to prevent the spread of respiratory infections, which are a leading cause of death and hospitalisation among young children worldwide,” said corresponding author Peter P. Moschovis, MD, MPH, of Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School.
Scanning electron micrograph of human respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) virions (colourised blue) and labelled with anti-RSV F protein/gold antibodies (colourised yellow) shedding from the surface of human lung epithelial A549 cells.
Credit: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health (NIH)
Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a dangerous early childhood viral infection, but results of a vaccine trial promise to change things radically.
A new study published in the New England Journal of Medicine, the world’s most prestigious medical journal, on 5 April that examined the effect of an RSV vaccine on pregnant women found that it reduced the risk of severe lower respiratory tract infections in newborns by 82%.
RSV is the most common cause of acute lower respiratory infection – or pneumonia – in infants. Globally, it was responsible for just over 100,000 deaths (with a lower bound of 84,000 deaths and an upper bound of 126,000 deaths) of children under five in 2019. Of these deaths 45% were infants (younger than six months), and nearly all deaths occurred in lower income countries (half in Africa alone). In an article in Spotlight in June 2022, Professor Cheryl Cohen, head of the Centre for Respiratory Diseases and Meningitis at the National Institute for Communicable Diseases (NICD), said that, pre-COVID, RSV led to 44 615 hospitalisations and 490 deaths in children under five each year in South Africa.
RSV causes cold-like symptoms, but can lead to severe symptoms like pneumonia. At present, there is no licensed RSV vaccine, though the virus was first identified in the 1960s.
The study was a phase three, double-blind trial (which compares a new treatment to standard care, and leads the way to regulatory approval and production) conducted in 18 countries, led by Beate Kampmann, Professor of Paediatric Infection and Immunity at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Shabir Madhi, Dean of the Faculty of Health Sciences and Professor of Vaccinology at the University of the Witwatersrand, and Iona Munjal, Director of Clinical Research & Development at Pfizer. It builds on earlier work by Madhi and others.
Women who were between 24 and 36 weeks pregnant were given an injection of a protein–based vaccine (RSVpreF) and a placebo. Pregnant women can passively transfer their immunity to viruses and diseases to their foetuses in utero.
They were then monitored to see if they suffered a severe RSV-associated lower respiratory tract illness that required medical attention, and if their newborns required medical attention for RSV-associated lower respiratory tract illness up to six months after birth.
A total of 7,358 women participated across the two trial groups, and 7,128 babies were monitored, and no safety concerns were identified over the course of the trial.
In November last year, Pfizer announced that it planned to submit a licence application to the US Food and Drug Administration after trials showed that the vaccine was highly effective at reducing severe RSV cases in the first 90 days of an infant’s life.
In a Twitter thread announcing the results, Madhi said that the next challenge would be to ensure that the vaccine is licensed across lower income countries, where most infant RSV deaths occur. Madhi said that there is a “moral responsibility on pharma to licence [the RSV] vaccine in LMIC [Lower and Middle Income Countries] at [an] affordable price.” Governments in poorer countries, “need to act to protect children in their counties by funding and deploying the vaccine timeously,” he said.
Madhi also informed GroundUp that coincidentally in the same issue of the New England Journal of Medicine, a medicine called nirsevimab was found to protect infants against RSV-associated hospitalisation and severe lower respiratory tract infections. Madhi and his team at Wits also participated in this trial.
This medicine is “administered as a single dose at the onset of RSV season,” Madhi explained. “The two approaches [the vaccine and nirsevimab] will be complementary.”
Studies have shown that children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) have an increased risk of obesity. In turn, obesity has been linked to increased risks for diabetes, dyslipidaemia and other cardiometabolic disorders. However, the question of whether or not there is an association between autism, cardiometabolic disorders and obesity remains largely unanswered.
To help provide an insight into the possible link between ASD and cardiometabolic diseases, Texas Tech University researchers conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis. Their findings were published in JAMA Pediatrics.
In this latest meta-analysis, the researchers evaluated 34 studies that included 276 173 participants who were diagnosed with ASD and 7 733 306 who were not. The results indicated that ASD was associated with greater risks of developing diabetes overall, including both type 1 and type 2 diabetes.
The meta-analysis also determined that autism is associated with increased risks of dyslipidaemia and heart disease, though there was no significant increased risk of hypertension and stroke associated with autism. However, meta-regression analyses revealed that children with autism were at a greater associated risk of developing diabetes and hypertension when compared with adults.
Study leader Chanaka N. Kahathuduwa, MD, PhD, said the overall results demonstrate the associated increased risk of cardiometabolic diseases in ASD patients, which should prompt clinicians to more closely monitor these patients for potential contributors, including signs of cardiometabolic disease and their complications.
“We have established the associations between autism and obesity, as well as autism and cardiometabolic disease, including diabetes and dyslipidaemia,” Kahathuduwa said. “We don’t have data to support a conclusion that autism is causing these metabolic derangements, but since we know that a child with autism is more likely to develop these metabolic complications and derangements down the road, I believe physicians should evaluate children with autism more vigilantly and maybe start screening them earlier than the usual.”
Kahathuduwa also believes the study shows that physicians should think twice before prescribing medications such as olanzapine that are well known to have metabolic adverse effects to children with autism.
“Our findings should also be an eye opener for patients with autism and parents of kids with autism to simply be mindful about the higher risk of developing obesity and metabolic complications,” Kahathuduwa added. “Then they can talk with their physicians about strategies to prevent obesity and metabolic disease.”
Kahathuduwa said the next logical step for the collaborative team would be to generate evidence that either supports or rejects causality with regard to the observed associations.
Early in the COVID pandemic, it became clear that children infected with the coronavirus rarely developed serious disease. One hypothesis has been that children already have some immunity provided by memory T cells generated by common colds. Researchers at Karolinska Institutet are now able to show that OC43, one of the coronaviruses that cause common colds, boosts the immune response to COVID. The study, which is published in PNAS, could give rise to more tailored vaccine programmes for children and adults.
After studying unique blood samples from children taken before the pandemic, Karolinska Institutet researchers have now identified memory T cells that react to cells infected with SARS-CoV-2.
This new study reinforces this hypothesis and shows that T cells previously activated by the OC43 virus can cross-react against SARS-CoV-2.
Four coronaviruses cause common colds
One of the four coronaviruses causing seasonal common cold symptoms could stimulate an immune response with T cells able to also react to cells infected with SARS-CoV-2.
“These reactions are especially strong early in life and grow much weaker as we get older,” says the study’s corresponding author Annika Karlsson, research group leader at the Department of Laboratory Medicine, Karolinska Institutet. “Our findings show how the T-cell response develops and changes over time and can guide the future monitoring and development of vaccines.”
Strong immunity at the age of two
The results indicate that the memory T-cell response to coronaviruses develops as early as the age of two. The study was based on 48 blood samples from two- and six-year-old children, and 94 samples from adults between the ages of 26 and 83. The analysis also included blood samples from 58 people who had recently recovered from COVID-19.
“Next, we’d like to do analogous studies of younger and older children, teenagers and young adults to better track how the immune response to coronaviruses develops from childhood to adulthood,” says Marion Humbert, postdoctoral researcher currently at the Department of Medicine Huddinge, Karolinska Institutet, joint first author with Anna Olofsson, doctoral student at the Department of Laboratory Medicine.
