While the lockdowns associated with the COVID pandemic led many families to eat more meals at home, they had an additional benefit: an increase in the quality of family time during those dinners, according to research published by the American Psychological Association.
The study, published in the journal Couple and Family Psychology: Research and Practice, found that families who ate together more often during the pandemic also had more positive interactions, shared news and information, and even embraced technology such as videoconferencing to connect with distant family members.
“The predominance of past research on family dinners has focused on frequency as the key predictor of benefits for children and adolescents,” said lead author Anne Fishel, PhD, a clinician and researcher in family therapy at Massachusetts General Hospital. “This study highlights the importance of examining both frequency and quality to understand the full picture of how shared meals can impact families.”
Researchers examined data from a survey of 517 ethnically and socioeconomically diverse parents across the United States, administered in May 2021. Their aim was to investigate changes in family dinner frequency and quality during the COVID pandemic.
Participants were asked about dinner frequency, quality and post-pandemic expectations. The survey included questions about positive and negative interactions, family support and incorporation of the outside world. They were asked questions such as, “During the pandemic, did all or most of the people living in your home eat dinner together less, about the same, or more than compared to before the pandemic?” Participants then provided answers ranging on a scale of 1–5, 1 being “much less” and 5 being “much more.”
Over 60% of respondents reported eating dinner together more often during the pandemic compared with pre-pandemic times. There was also a significant increase in positive interactions (e.g, expressing gratitude, laughing or feeling connected) during family meals.
“Specifically, 56% said they increased talking about their days during dinner, 60% said they increased talking about their identity as a family, 60% said they increased expressing gratitude, 67% said they increased laughing together and 59% said they felt more connected to each other around the dinner table,” said Fishel. This positive association was evident across income levels, education, age, gender and race.
The pandemic introduced new aspects to family dinners, including remote dining with extended family members and more discussions about current events, according to Fishel. Many families turned to videoconferencing to connect with extended family, potentially strengthening a sense of belonging to a larger family unit. Most parents who increased the use of technology for remote dinners during the pandemic reported that they plan to continue this practice as the pandemic subsides.
The researchers also found an increase in families incorporating news and information from the outside world into their dinner conversations, potentially offering a safe space for children to discuss anxieties and questions with their parents.
Overall, this study suggests that the increased frequency of family dinners during the pandemic may have had lasting positive effects on family dynamics, according to Fishel.
Around twenty years ago, family physicians seemed set to take up roles as critical cogs across South Africa’s public healthcare system, but in the years since, doctors trained in this speciality have largely been underutilised. That is now finally set to change, according to the Department of Health, Chris Bateman reports.
The National Department of Health has signalled that they want to see more family physicians appointed as clinical managers tasked with leading multi-disciplinary district hospital teams. This follows years of lobbying by the South African Academy of Family Physicians (SAAFP) advocating for the greater utilisation of family physicians in the country’s public healthcare system.
The SAAFP has long argued the cost and clinical effectiveness of these “super generalists”, who undergo an extra four years of training, with an emphasis on clinical governance and knowledge of social factors influencing people’s health. And it seems their patience has been rewarded with a five-year district health blueprint from government.
This was confirmed to Spotlight by Dr Luvuyo Bayeni, Chief Director of Human Resources for Health at the National Department of Health.
Advocates for the speciality argue that family physicians have been neglected, with posts thin on the ground and their potential contribution under-estimated. The discipline was registered with the HPCSA in 2007.
Professor Bob Mash, Distinguished Professor at Stellenbosch University where he heads the Division of Family Medicine and Primary Care, describes the specialty as “one of the most underutilised solutions to many of the problems facing district health service delivery”. Mash is the immediate past president of the SAAFP.
Bayeni, a former clinician/administrator in the Eastern Cape, was appointed to lead the health department’s human resource operations in July last year. Since then, he attended the last two annual SAAFP conferences and has been meeting regularly with the academy’s leadership.
With austerity measures being the catch-all rebuttal by provincial heads of department whenever the wisdom of freezing posts is questioned, Bayeni is trying to persuade his provincial counterparts to adopt a policy of appointing family physicians to clinical manager posts as a highly cost-efficient move, citing successes in the Western Cape. The idea is that family physicians are able to quickly diagnose and treat patients while mentoring junior colleagues. They also help design or tweak hospital and referral clinic systems for efficiency and identify preventative health interventions at community level.
Blueprint approved
In a wide-ranging interview with Spotlight, Bayeni said his family medicine oriented blueprint had been approved by the Presidency’s Department of Policy Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation for inclusion in all future health indicators. His plan is to initially get family physicians as clinical managers into all medium to large district hospitals (150 beds and above), before ensuring they are placed in every health district, including at lower level hospitals and community health centres, at all times leading a multi-disciplinary team.
“Instead of waiting for HR plans and organograms, this is going into the mid-term framework for monitoring. It’s a strategic opportunity, where we ask ourselves, ‘how do we define a multi-disciplinary team for a district hospital?’ and then work through and with them. We’ll define and map where our priority district hospitals are, starting with the medium to large district hospitals,” he said.
Bayeni said he met with his provincial counterparts and military health service chiefs last week, (14-18 October), where he said he was going to, “make sure they all know about this. Organograms are all fine and well and necessary, but I want this top of mind when they consider them.”
“Personally, by April next year, (the new financial year), I want to see more family physicians being appointed, either in the district or in the position of clinical managers wherever there are vacancies. I’ll ask the provinces to help me with monitoring and evaluation,” he said.
He said his ambition is to change the mindset of provincial healthcare leaders “wherever necessary” about family physicians being regarded as “just another specialty” when creating and enumerating posts.
Positive responses
Several top family medicine academics and clinicians around the country who have been at the forefront of providing data and lobbying for a more pragmatic healthcare delivery approach, welcomed the renewed focus on family physicians.
Professor Steve Reid, a veteran rural family physician and head of Primary Health Care at the University of Cape Town (UCT), told Spotlight the main problem was what he called a framing issue.
“The way we think about medicine is to just go to the doctor and get it sorted, rather than how a huge number of diseases can be managed and prevented early on – it’s been a major shift over the last fifty years. I mean we now have studies that link pre-natal health to later chronic diseases. The whole idea of social medicine went out of vogue, and the idea that health has far more to do with the social determinants of health than it has to do with the health system had too little purchase,” he said.
Reid observed that no family physician can work in isolation – they made the most difference when they had a multi-disciplinary team around them.
Labelling family physicians “boundary-spanners par excellence”, he said “they join the dots rather than work in silos like other specialties who tend to guard their turf jealously.”
“Brazil is a middle-income country just like South Africa and their simple model of one doctor, a nurse and four to six community health workers per 4 000 population has got 80% of their population covered, including vast urban areas like Sao Paulo and Rio de Janeiro,” he said. In South Africa’s case, having a family physician as the leader will further enhance this model.
‘Around 400 needed’
Mash said South Africa’s previous health policies saw family physicians as a sub-specialty of internal medicine or as specialists who should work at tertiary hospitals and within primary care teams. Currently, chiefly due to the lack of posts, only a third of family medicine graduates were retained in the public sector, with ten percent emigrating and eleven percent giving up medicine altogether. Most were employed in the Western Cape, where the health system had committed to appointing family medicine practitioners at district hospitals and primary care facilities, Mash added.
The SAAFP recommends a mid-term goal of one family physician at every district hospital, community health centre or sub-district.
To achieve this, said Mash, another 400 family physicians are needed, but at current training rates this could take up to two decades, (not accounting for the current shortage of posts).
He agreed with Public Health Medicine Specialist Tracey Naledi, that only when there’s wider and stronger investment in primary healthcare across provinces will better deployment of Family Medicine practitioners begin to make a real difference to district level health and wellness. Naledi is Associate Professor in Public Health Medicine and Deputy Dean of Social Accountability and Health Systems at UCT’s Faculty of Health Sciences.
Naledi said that while there are many highly skilled veteran ‘utility’ Medical Officers in the district health system, the greater utility of family medicine is in clinical governance, health systems strengthening initiatives and capacity development. Besides teaching, monitoring, and evaluating healthcare delivery, she said family physicians also more appropriately and timeously refer patients to secondary and tertiary care.
Specialist support
“The family physicians should not just be seeing sixty patients at their door daily. They are specialist support – the Medical Officers should be calling them for advice. If family physicians were optimized, we’d see far less referral to tertiary level services,” she said.
The problem is structural, she believes.
“There are not enough human resources for health in general, so at district level people get pulled into doing what’s needed on the shop floor. There’s not enough time to do the strategic work,” she said.
“You can’t just talk about family medicine without talking about full staff requirements. When a family physician goes on outreach, it should not just be about dealing with difficult cases but building the capacity of the outlying areas. They need to ask themselves what they’re leaving behind. Otherwise, you’re cleaning the floor but not closing the tap,” she added.
Mash agreed that family medicine practitioners are “not the magic bullet – but introducing them into district health services can go quite a way towards strengthening the system”.
“We’ve trained them to work independently, to be the senior clinician with the full spectrum of needed skills, on top of which they provide the confidence for the doctors who are there to practice the skills they have. It’s very reassuring having a senior person to help if things go wrong, so it’s a combination of increased confidence and bringing in additional skills,” he said.
“A primary health nurse and community health worker can provide coverage and connection to the community, but a [family medicine] FM practitioner brings in a level of expertise so the team has both coverage and quality,” he added.
History and training
As Mash tells it, from the nineties into the first decade of the 2000s, no medical schools exposed undergraduates to Family Medicine. However, nearly thirty years on, curricula have completely turned around.
Mash says some twenty to thirty family medicine practitioners graduate from the ten South African campuses every year, among the chief disincentives to the specialisation being the paucity of available posts. He said it’s critical to create more family medicine posts “if we are to attract people into that career path. If managers believe a family physician’s contribution is worthwhile, they can outmanoeuvre these restrictive budgets.”
He said public health was being “hugely damaged” by an austerity mindset.
Professor Shabir Moosa, Family Physician in the Department of Family Medicine at Wits University, suggested offering a two-year distance learning diploma in family medicine to get family medicine practitioners into practice faster and then offering in-service further tuition to a full post-graduate degree. Moosa is a former President of the World Organization of Family Doctor’s Africa region.
“Right now, you have family physicians in community healthcare centres which see a thousand people a day. Their job is capacity building, but they’re stuck with menial tasks. Also, right now qualified Family Medicine practitioners, at Wits at least, have a thirty percent teaching commitment so they’re being pulled in many different directions.”
Like Mash, he said “turnstile leadership” in the provinces wrecked progress while leadership in primary healthcare at district and lower levels was mainly by nurses, who were uncomfortable sharing space with family physicians whom they saw as a “power threat”.
Moosa says most family medicine practitioners in rural South Africa (with the exception of the Western Cape), are foreign qualified doctors who found studying it an “easy entrance route”. He takes issue with the emphasis on training family physicians exclusively for use in rural areas, saying that with accelerating urbanisation, this is short-sighted.
Parallel with clinical associates
Associate Professor Tasleem Ras, President of the SAAFP and Postgraduate Programme Director of Family Medicine at UCT, drew a parallel with clinical associates which some provinces had adopted and others not, saying they had no career pathways which has become “a political hot potato”. (Spotlight previously reported under the under-utilisation of clinical associates here and here.)
Ras was alluding to the provincially disparate usage of both categories of healthcare professionals. In the case of family physicians at least, senior medical officer and registrar posts are being creatively used by some provinces to place them, with salary adjustments built in. Clinical associates have no such luxury.
Naledi says she suspects that healthcare delivery leaders in individual provinces have widely differing views on how to use family physicians, with commensurately differing patient care outcomes. She says the grading of healthcare facilities by the Office for Healthcare Standards Compliance eloquently illustrates an overemphasis on curative service-based funding, with lower-level primary healthcare facilities scoring worst, followed by secondary or district hospitals with tertiary hospitals scoring the highest. Unless this changes, she says “we will continue failing to get bang for buck”.
She adds: “If you look at the district health system, it doesn’t have the full cadre of staff. I mean palliative care, mental health, dental services – these are all structural and broader resource issues for me. You can’t look at family medicine in isolation.”
The argument is that building more capacity for prevention and health promotion would begin to dismantle a self-perpetuating cycle of predominantly curative services. Family medicine training, Naledi says, focuses a lot more on the social determinants of health, prevention, rehabilitation, and palliative care. “It’s not just about clinical abilities but about them being family and community doctors,” she adds.
While grandmothers today have a popular image of spoiling their grandchildren with treats, in premodern times they also acted as healthcare providers. To find out more, University of Turku researchers looked at historical data on childhood mortality from infectious diseases in the 18th and 19th century in Finland. The study, which is published in the journal Proceedings of the Royal Society B, found that grandmothers decreased all-cause and cause-specific mortality of children.
In historical and in several contemporary societies, children with living grandmothers are more likely to survive into adulthood, but the mechanism behind this effect remains poorly known.
As childhood infections have been a leading cause of death in children under the age of 5 years, the researchers aimed to investigate whether the effect of grandmothers on childhood survival was related to providing knowledge in childcare, particularly during critical times such as epidemics. One way for grandmothers to do so could be by encouraging vaccine uptake or earlier vaccination against childhood infections, as has been observed in some contemporary populations.
Researchers first studied the effects of grandmothers on children’s cause-specific mortality, using historical records of five causes of death: smallpox, measles, pulmonary infections, diarrhoeal deaths, and accidents. The large multigenerational dataset of pre-industrial Finnish families included 9705 individuals from 12 parishes across Finland, where the survival of individuals until the of age 15 years was monitored from 1761 to 1900. In the second part of the study, the researchers determined whether increased survival against the childhood infection smallpox was mediated by vaccination. To this end, they used 1594 vaccination records from two rural parishes and matched them to their individual family histories.
The results show that grandmothers decreased all-cause mortality, an effect which was mediated through improved survival from smallpox, pulmonary and diarrhoeal infections, but not from measles or accidents. However, the researchers found no evidence of increased or earlier vaccination between children with or without grandmothers.
“Our results show that the grandmother’s presence protected against some childhood infections, which could indicate that in historical Finnish society, the assistance provided by grandmothers in childcare was likely an important factor in ensuring the survival of children,” says study lead author, Doctoral Researcher Susanna Ukonaho.
Grandmothers in contemporary societies
Although grandmother care provided health benefits in many historical societies, these benefits may no longer be relevant in contemporary societies. The progress in healthcare during the 20th century especially in high-income countries likely decreased the role of grandmothers. However, some studies indicate that grandmothers improve childhood survival in several contemporary middle- and low-income countries.
“The type of benefits that grandmothers provide may vary depending on cultural contexts and individual circumstances. Even though in many societies grandmothers are no longer essential for childhood survival, their efforts in childcare remain valuable for the well-being of the whole family,” says Ukonaho.