Category: Healthcare Politics and Regulations

Categories : Healthcare Politics and RegulationsTags :

SA has a “Bogus Doctor” Problem

On By ModernMedia
Under South African law, no one may practise medicine unless they have the proper training and are officially registered. Photo by Usman Yousaf on Unsplash

By Elna Schütz

Bogus medical practitioners threaten the health of patients and undermine trust in doctors. The problem might be growing, but so is the fight against it.

“If you’re in the hands of an unqualified person, you’re as well as dead, and we think it is not fair for the country,” Dr Magome Masike tells Spotlight.

He is the Registrar of the Health Professions Council of South Africa (HPCSA), which is responsible for the registration of medical doctors and other health professionals in South Africa.

The controversy over bogus doctors gained widespread attention in late 2023 when it was discovered that ‘TikTok doctor’ Matthew Lani lied about being a medical doctor. In his videos, Lani was often seen in scrubs and wearing a stethoscope, impersonating a medical doctor. Although he was arrested at Helen Joseph Hospital in Johannesburg, the National Prosecuting Authority eventually decided not to prosecute.

The term bogus doctor has become a shorthand for any medical practitioner who is working without being properly qualified or registered by the HPCSA. In practice, being “bogus” can also apply to physiotherapists, interns, or anyone else practising medicine.

The misrepresentation may include using fraudulent certificates, using another practitioner’s registration, or being suspended or erased from the register. It can involve someone who studied but did not fully qualify, or has not kept up to date with their registration. Masike gives the example of the child of a registered practitioner who decides to take on their parent’s practice after their death without themselves being registered.

It is an ongoing problem. In the beginning of February, the HPCSA says it facilitated the arrest of a woman working at a medical facility in Midrand, north of Johannesburg, allegedly without being correctly registered to practice medicine.

Bogus qualifications are part of the larger problem of healthcare fraud. According to research in a report by risk management services firm D-Finitive, it is estimated that this fraud overall costs African countries more than USD50 billion in 2012. In the South African private sector, that comes to about R22-28 billion a year. The report explains that beyond bogus practitioners, there is a problem with similar fraud, like doctors billing more clients than is realistic, manipulating diagnostic and procedural codes, or deceased doctors billing the government for decades after their death. At times, this type of fraud is reportedly executed by syndicates.

“While the majority of practitioners are honest and committed to patient care, it takes only a small number of bad actors, whether unregistered impostors or credentialed professionals abusing the system, to inflict widespread damage,” says Dr Katlego Mothudi, Managing Director of the Board of Healthcare Funders (BHF).

A substantial problem

Masike says that from March 2024 to February 2025, 49 bogus practitioners were caught and arrested. From April to December 2025, that number was at 17. Even though these numbers do not suggest a year-on-year increase, Masike says that overall, the numbers are increasing.

The HPCSA’s annual report for 2024/2025 shows that 589 investigations into unregistered persons were concluded in the year in question. Over the past five years, 3 708 complaints were received.

The majority of bogus practitioners who have been caught were operating in economic hubs of the Western Cape, Gauteng, and KwaZulu-Natal, Masike says. “Bogus people want money, so they go where there’s money,” he explains. However, while the trend tends urban, he says rural communities also fall prey to scammers.

“A notable pattern is that many of these individuals use or forge the details of legitimately registered practitioners,” Masike says.

It is, of course, unclear how many unlicensed practitioners are not yet caught. “We can tell you the problem is bigger than we think,” Masike says. The problem, he says, is sector-wide and stretches across different health professions, with most of these illegal practices occurring in the private sector. Masike adds that bogus doctors often work with a network of others, for example, those who supply unregistered or fake medicines.

Mothudi also says that the problem is growing. “Medical schemes are seeing a rise in suspicious provider activity picked up through claims analysis and credential verification processes,” he says. This may include practitioners misrepresenting their registration status, practising outside their approved scope, or using the registration details of legitimate practitioners to submit claims.

Risk to patients

Catching and prosecuting bogus practitioners is crucial because they can pose a direct danger to unsuspecting patients. “Unregistered medical doctors, like other health professionals, pose severe risks to patients, including serious physical harm, injury, and misdiagnosis which may lead to death, due to their lack of necessary training, ethical standards and relevant qualifications,” warns Foster Mohale, the spokesperson for the National Department of Health.

Dr Zanele Bikitsha, National Vice Chairperson of the South African Medical Association, cautions that if bogus doctors are performing procedures, it will likely be in settings that are not appropriate or sterile.

“They’re not going to go to a registered facility, because they know they’ll be caught, so this puts patients in danger as well.”

While some operate on a cash basis, Mothudi says that submitting claims to medical schemes is attractive because it allows for much larger and repeatable payouts. “In some cases, bogus practitioners submit claims using stolen, borrowed or fraudulently obtained practice numbers belonging to legitimately registered healthcare professionals,” he says. “In other instances, they collude with registered providers who allow their credentials to be misused in exchange for payment.”

Knowing the signs

While the HPCSA undertakes compliance inspections, there are some clear signs that might help the public spot a bogus practitioner. Firstly, it is a legal requirement to have registration information easily visible in a practitioner’s practice and on the letterhead of documents or prescription notes.

Members of the public can also look up a doctor’s credentials. All registered practitioners should be listed in the HPCSA’s digital register online, which is publicly searchable. With as little as the practitioner’s surname, the system lets users search for registered practitioners.

Masike points out that a trained doctor tends to take an extensive medical history and make a systemic or wide-reaching inquiry. He recommends that patients look out for how doctors speak and whether they use and are able to explain medical terminology.

Complaints can be filed with the HPCSA’s Inspectorate, including anonymously. Their call centre is at 0123389300/1 and they can be e-mailed at office@hpcsa.co.za. Suspicious practitioners may also be reported to hospitals, the Department of Health, SAMA or other medical organisations.

Processing the problem

Complaints typically lead to an investigation by the HPCSA Inspectorate, which works together with other entities, such as the South African Health Products Regulatory Authority (SAHPRA), the Office of Health Standards Compliance, the Special Investigating Unit (SIU), and the South African Police Service.

Masike explains that the investigation tends to lead to a clandestine operation and involves the police arresting the suspects. He adds that police recently assigned specific staff members to focus on these cases. He says that once the case goes to court, there is a conviction rate of around 77%, although this may have changed. “Many of the cases from 2023 to 2025 remain before the courts, and therefore updated conviction statistics are not yet available.”

Practising medicine without proper training and registration is in contravention of Section 17(1) of the Health Professions Act, 56 of 1974. Typical sentences for such fraud include fines, such as R12 000, or around two years imprisonment. In one 2017 case, a man who had treated almost a thousand patients over six years was sentenced to 20 years’ imprisonment by the Mahikeng High Court in the North West.

Bikitsha says there are other systemic changes that could help catch the problem earlier on. “If you are still paper-based, you are at risk,” she says, referring to the way that hospitals and institutes tend to verify the qualifications of most interns, locums and medical practitioners. She argues that upgrading to biometrics and digital systems would decrease the risk of fraud.

Another step forward is simply to increase public awareness and education, so that patients know the risks.

Masike concurs. “We need society to stand up to this,” he says. “We need a participating community to get rid of this malaise, otherwise it will continue forever.”

Republished from Spotlight under a Creative Commons licence.

Read the original article.

Categories : Healthcare Politics and RegulationsTags :

State Attorney Calls for a New Road Accident Fund Tribunal

On By ModernMedia

Courts are clogged with thousands of RAF cases

Photo by Bill Oxford on Unsplash

By Justin Brown

South Africa’s judicial system is so clogged with Road Accident Fund (RAF) cases that a top judicial official has called for an RAF tribunal.

The RAF is a government agency that compensates people for losses resulting from vehicle accidents. It receives most of its income from the RAF levy, currently at R2.18 per litre on petrol and diesel.

The fund has been in disarray for years.

A judge of the North Gauteng High Court in Pretoria has said the RAF’s “chaotic approach to litigation” has resulted in huge losses of public money. In a ruling last June, Judge Jan Swanepoel said the RAF did not deal with its matters properly, does not send lawyers to court to oppose applications or, if it does, does not provide them with any instructions.

This resulted in “default” judgments. The fund would then apply to rescind the judgments, often on baseless grounds.

“In this manner huge sums of money, public money, it must be emphasised, are lost,” said Swanepoel.

Now Simbongile Siyali, assistant State Attorney in Johannesburg, has made the case for a special tribunal in a piece published in December 2025 by the Law Society of South Africa’s (LSSA) magazine, De Rebus. The LSSA represents South Africa’s attorneys.

Siyali said the government had intended the RAF to be efficient, but laying a claim has become a cumbersome, litigious process that has overwhelmed the judiciary and burdened claimants.

“The mounting backlog of RAF cases – often stretching into years before resolution – has eroded public confidence in the system,” he wrote.

Siyali also pointed out that high courts are ill-suited to deal efficiently with the technical and repetitive nature of RAF claims.

“Against this backdrop, the establishment of a specialised tribunal dedicated exclusively to RAF matters emerges not merely as an administrative convenience but as a constitutional necessity.”

The huge RAF case backlog had profound human consequences, he said.

“Many RAF claimants are individuals who have suffered serious bodily injuries, loss of income or the death of a breadwinner.”

He said there were other specialised courts, including the Labour Court, the Competition Tribunal, the Land Claims Court, the Tax Court and the Electoral Court.

A dedicated tribunal could develop institutional expertise and standardise approaches to damages assessment.

“In doing so, it would improve not only the speed of adjudication but also the substantive fairness of outcomes.”

A RAF tribunal would comprise adjudicators – possibly senior judges, senior magistrates, and legal practitioners – who have significant experience in personal injury and insurance law.

The tribunal would be cost-effective, he said.

“The current model is extraordinarily expensive for claimants and the Fund.”

“The time has come for bold reform. Establishing a specialised tribunal for RAF disputes would not only unclog the courts but would mark a decisive step toward a more efficient, responsive and humane justice system – one that truly delivers on the constitutional promise of access to justice for all.”

Parliament’s Standing Committee on Public Accounts (SCOPA) is currently holding an inquiry into the RAF.

SCOPA member and ActionSA MP Alan Beesley said it was painfully clear that the RAF “is completely broken”.

He said ActionSA would support the establishment of a specialised RAF tribunal.

“If urgent changes are not implemented, the RAF horror show will continue, and the clogging up of the justice system will get considerably worse,” Beesley said.

DA MP and SCOPA member Patrick Atkinson told GroundUp the DA would support any action that would help streamline the resolution of RAF claims.

“The establishment of a RAF tribunal that would deal specifically with RAF matters would go some way to alleviating the burden on both the courts, as they stand, with court rolls clogged with RAF matters, and speed up the finalisation of claims.”

But Atkinson warned that an RAF tribunal would be a partial resolution for a “completely dysfunctional process”. He said RAF court cases could be reduced by running an efficient settlement system where the RAF would make offers to claimants based on a transparent menu of payouts for a specified list of injuries and their severity.

“If run efficiently, far fewer cases would end up in court, and lawyers would have to balance the value of an immediate settlement versus a protracted court battle that may not yield much more for their clients.”

ANC MP and SCOPA member Helen Neale-May said she was unable to comment

GroundUp emailed SCOPA chairperson Songezo Zibi’s spokesperson but no response had been received at the time of publication.

Wayne Duvenage, the chief executive of Organisation Undoing Tax Abuse (OUTA) said he would support a dedicated RAF tribunal.

‘We believe that the RAF entity has been badly managed and fraught with political interference over the past decade to 15 years,” he said.

Republished from GroundUp under a Creative Commons licence.

Read the original article.

Categories : Healthcare Politics and RegulationsTags :

R23.9 Billion, 72 000 lives, One Budget Speech

On By ModernMedia

Why the Health Promotion Levy can no longer be delayed

Johannesburg, 19 January 2026: When Petrus Cockrell wakes up each morning, the first thing he reaches for is his wheelchair. Diabetes took both his legs before he turned 50. It robbed him of his mobility, his job and the simple joy of walking beside his dog.1 Petrus is one of millions of South Africans living with a disease that did not need to progress this far. Behind every statistic is someone like him, a parent, a worker, a caregiver whose life has been cut short or forever altered by a preventable illness.

With the National Budget Speech scheduled for February, the Healthy Living Alliance (HEALA) is calling on government to increase the Health Promotion Levy (HPL) on sugary drinks from 11% to 20%, a life-saving decision backed by evidence.

The HPL is part of South Africa’s broader package of health taxes, alongside tobacco and alcohol excise duties, which have long been used to protect the public from preventable harm.

“Every amputation, every blindness diagnosis, every child who loses a parent to diabetes is a reminder that we have waited too long,” says Nzama Mbalati, CEO of HEALA. “The HPL is not a standalone experiment; it is a proven health tax. Government has used health taxes successfully for decades. Strengthening the HPL simply extends that legacy to protect South Africans from excessive sugar consumption.”

The urgency of this demand is underscored by modelling from PRICELESS SA (University of the Witwatersrand).  The data indicates that increasing the HPL to 20% could prevent 619 000 new diabetes cases, save approximately 72 000 lives, prevent 85 000 strokes and save South Africa R23.9 billion in healthcare costs over 25 years.2

“We treat people every day for conditions that should never have progressed this far. The HPL is not just a tax, it is a protective shield for millions of South Africans,” says medical doctor and health advocate Dr Darren Green, featured in HEALA’s upcoming campaign. “Strengthening it means fewer amputations, fewer patients on dialysis and fewer children growing up without parents. Very few interventions deliver such measurable health benefits, especially for communities already carrying the heaviest burden.”

As tariff disputes and import pressures dominate sugar industry news, HEALA emphasises that tariffs and the HPL must not be conflated. Tariffs are trade instruments designed to stabilise industries. The HPL is a public health instrument designed to save lives.

“We cannot allow tariff debates to derail a health tax that works,” Mbalati adds. “Just as we use tobacco and alcohol taxes to protect South Africans from harm, the HPL is a critical part of our national health tax framework. Strengthening it is a public health necessity, not an industry target.”

HEALA’s documentary series continues to reveal the human cost of diabetes. Alphinah, who lost both legs and her eyesight; Mpho, who believed sugar was harmless until he lost his leg at 45 and now Petrus, each offering a powerful reminder that these outcomes were preventable. Their message is clear: if they had known sooner, their lives would look different. Government now has the power to prevent thousands more from walking the same path.

HEALA calls on the public to stand with Petrus and millions of others by demanding decisive government action. As the Budget Speech approaches and the Health Promotion Levy faces growing pressure from industry interference, South Africans are urged to sign the petition supporting the increase of the HPL to 20% before the Minister of Finance takes the podium in February. Sign the petition at www.heala.org.

References:

  1. HEALA Diabetes Documentary Series (2025).
  2. PRICELESS SA. The Cost of Not Setting the Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Tax at 20%. (2025).
Categories : Healthcare Politics and RegulationsTags :

Spotlight’s Top 9 Health Stories to Watch in 2026

On By ModernMedia
With several important developments on the horizon, 2026 is set to be another eventful year in healthcare. Photo by Anna Shvets

19th January 2026 | By Marcus Low

From the limited rollout of a new HIV prevention jab to developments with new weight loss medicines, to high-stakes court cases relating to National Health Insurance (NHI), 2026 is set to be another tumultuous year in healthcare. Here are nine stories that Spotlight will keep a close eye on.

 1. How will things go with the local rollout of a new HIV prevention jab? 

Given the high rates of HIV in South Africa, the biggest HIV story this year is likely to be the rollout of a new HIV prevention jab at around 360 (roughly 10%) of South Africa’s public sector clinics. The jab, which contains the antiretroviral medicine lenacapavir, provides six months of protection against HIV infection at a time. It could be a gamechanger for people who, for whatever reason, struggle to take daily prevention pills. We will be tracking how and to whom the jab is made available and whether uptake meets expectations. 

As we reported last year, work is also underway on a new lenacapavir formulation that could provide 12 months of protection per shot. We’ll be scouring journals and conference programmes for new data on this formulation. 

2. Will we see better access to weight loss medicines? 

The class of diabetes and weight loss drugs called GLP1-RAs have taken the world by storm in recent years. Until recently, drugs like semaglutide (brand names Ozempic or Wegovy) and tirzepatide (brand names Zepbound or Mounjaro) were only available as injections. The GLP1-RA market is, however, set to be upended by the introduction of some of these medicines in pill form. The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recently registered a semaglutide pill for use for weight loss. Another weight loss pill called orforglipron is also expected to be registered this year. One big question is when these pills will be registered and made available in South Africa and at what price. 

Another important GLP1-RA development this year will be the expiration of a key patent on semaglutide in India. This will open the door to generic manufacturers bringing their own versions of semaglutide to market – something that usually leads to substantial price reductions. We will be keeping a close eye on how this situation plays out and analysing what the implications are for people in South Africa. 

3. Might we see earlier than expected findings from pivotal TB vaccine trials? 

The one TB vaccine we have is over a hundred years old and only provides limited protection for kids. Several experimental vaccines are, however, currently being evaluated in late-stage clinical trials. Arguably, the most notable of these is the M72 vaccine, which is being assessed in a massive phase 3 study, partly conducted in South Africa. 

While timelines suggest most of the key TB vaccine studies will not yet have anything to report this year, it is possible that we might see a surprise or two. Findings are sometimes reported early if it becomes apparent ahead of schedule that a medicine or vaccine is clearly working, or clearly not working, as the case may be. Whether or not we see findings this year, it is important to start thinking about what a rollout might look like in our health system should results be as good as hoped. The M72 vaccine had around 50% efficacy in phase 2 trials, so there is reason for optimism. 

4. Will we see a concrete plan to address public sector healthcare worker shortages? 

Arguably, the most important dynamic in South Africa’s public healthcare system today is that provincial health departments are not employing enough healthcare workers across multiple categories. One reason for this is simply that budgets have generally shrunk over the last decade – obviously corruption and mismanagement in several provincial departments have made things even worse. There was a glimmer of hope in last year’s budget in which we saw a meaningful upturn in health funding for the first time in years, but that was at best a good first step toward recovery. As we enter 2026, our understanding is that all of the nine provinces are still facing severe healthcare worker shortages. 

More money for health in the next budget will certainly help, but there is a broader sense that government doesn’t really have a big picture vision for how to address the crisis. We do have a 2030 Human Resources for Health Strategy, but as with many such strategies, it seems to have so far gone largely unimplemented. 

5. Will enablers be held accountable for corruption such as that at Thembisa Hospital? 

One of last year’s big media moments was a Special Investigating Unit (SIU) press conference in which they described the extensive corruption said to have taken place at Thembisa Hospital. One snag, however, is that while the SIU can recoup funds and take matters to the Special Tribunal, the SIU does not conduct criminal prosecutions – though they can refer matters to the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) for prosecution. Whether we will see successful NPA prosecutions relating to the Thembisa Hospital corruption is one of the year’s top questions. 

Unfortunately, even when the SIU does sterling work and delivers cases to the NPA on a plate, there is no guarantee that the NPA will do its job. One depressing example is that of Buthelezi EMS. Last year, the Special Tribunal ordered Buthelezi EMS (and other companies with similar names) to pay over half-a-billion Rand back to the state. The SIU also referred a related matter to the NPA in 2024 for prosecution, but Spotlight understands that the NPA has rather mind-bogglingly decided to drop the matter. 

6. Which, if any, senior health leaders will lose their jobs this year? 

While we won’t have national or provincial elections this year, that is no guarantee that we won’t see any health leaders losing their jobs. Over the last two decades, there have after all been many examples of people being ousted between elections, be it for purely political reasons or due to corruption scandals. 

Possibly the political leader in the health sector at greatest risk is KwaZulu-Natal MEC for Health, Nomagugu Simelane. Should the currently governing coalition of political parties in the province crumble, as it seems it might do, chances are several new MECs will be deployed, including for the health portfolio. 

There is also an outside chance that the country’s top health official, Dr Sandile Buthelezi, Director-General for Health in the National Department of Health, might be forced to step down. As reported by AmaBhungane, Buthelezi played a central role in an “irregular” R836-million oxygen procurement process and is also “at the centre of a Hawks investigation into allegations that he solicited a R500 000 bribe”. Our understanding is that Buthelezi has not been charged and that in the absence of charges he will stay in the job. 

7. What will happen in the landmark NHI court cases? 

Despite a new call for dialogue from Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana, chances for a political settlement over National Health Insurance (NHI) remains very low. The bottom line remains that Health Minister Dr Aaron Motsoaledi refuses to yield an inch on the version of NHI described in the Act and President Cyril Ramaphosa is not willing to force the matter. 

Instead, it seems the battle over NHI will this year be fought mainly in the courts. At our count, there are at least eight cases challenging the NHI Act, parts of the Act, or the process resulting in the Act. A first development to look out for is whether or not some of the cases will be combined and heard together. In case you missed it, last year we published a two-part series in which we tried to pin down the issues on which these court cases are likely to turn (see part 1 and part 2). 

While we will cover the NHI court cases in some depth, we will also try to foster constructive discussions on health reforms on our opinion pages and in our analysis. In our view, it is dangerously limiting to reduce the debate over South Africa’s healthcare reforms to a simple binary of whether one is for or against NHI. 

8. What will be left of the FDA, NIH, and CDC by the end of 2026? 

It used to be the case that United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) decisions and health advice from the United States Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) carried a lot of weight around the world. In recent months, however, there have been increasing signs of political interference at these institutions and a turn away from evidence-based policy making. It seems inevitable that we will see more of the same in 2026 and the credibility of both the CDC and probably also the FDA will be further diminished. 

Similarly, the US National Institutes for Health (NIH) has been the world’s leading funder of health research for many years. But as with the CDC, the work of the NIH has been overly politicised over the last year and its reputation for rigour and scientific excellence has already been severely degraded. As with the FDA and CDC, the outlook is bleak. 

9. How well will SA and other countries recover from last year’s US aid cuts? 

With the dust settling after last year’s severe and abrupt cuts to US healthcare aid and US funding for medical research, the longer-term impacts of those cuts in South Africa and neighbouring countries should become clearer this year. Among others, we will get the first reliable estimates of key HIV and TB indicators for 2025 (reliable figures for a specific year are typically only published in the subsequent year). New HIV estimates from the Thembisa mathematical model (Spotlight’s preferred source for HIV estimates) should be out around the middle of the year, while new World Health Organization (WHO) TB estimates are usually released in November. 

Last year Motsoaledi was widely criticised by activists for underplaying the seriousness of the cuts for South Africa’s HIV response and the scale of specialised services and capacity that was destroyed here. Eventually some extra funds were made available in response to the cuts, but it amounted to only a small fraction of what was lost. The harsh reality is that in some places the aftermath of the aid cuts will be felt for years to come. 

At an international level, we are also not convinced that a clear roadmap has been set out for building back better after US withdrawal, though we’d be happy to be proven wrong. What is clear though is that entities like the WHO and UNAIDS are facing unprecedented financial and political pressures – it seems possible that UNAIDS will no longer exist a year from now. Much reform has already been undertaken at the WHO. By the end of the year, we should have some sense of whether things have stabilised and whether a coalition of willing nations is truly committed to keeping the WHO and multilateralism in health alive. 

We have outlined only nine health issues in the above, but there are of course many more questions that we could have added to this list. Some of those include: 

  • Whether we will see meaningful improvement in the South African government’s response to non-communicable diseases such as diabetes, cancers, and mental health conditions. 
  • How well implementation of South Africa’s latest TB recovery plan is going, and in particular how we are doing against the target of testing five million people in 12 months. 
  • How climate change will impact people’s health and whether the South African government is prepared for it. 
  • Whether South Africa will see real progress in addressing antimicrobial resistance. After adopting a good policy a few years ago, it appears momentum has been lost. 
  • Whether the state will start taking xenophobia in the healthcare system and around clinics and hospitals more seriously, as a recent court judgment requires it to do. 
  • Whether a serious effort will be made to better regulate private healthcare and to bring down the cost of private healthcare services and medical scheme membership – that after a half-baked effort to create a new tariff-determination framework was launched and then canned last year. 
  • Whether we will see legislation introduced amending the Patents Act in line with a policy adopted by government in 2018 and whether we’ll see progress on the much-delayed State Liability Bill, which should have relevance for the state’s vulnerability to medico-legal claims. 
  • Whether we will see concrete steps forward with the new electronic health records and data systems government is developing. 
  • What progress we might see with the local production of vaccines and pharmaceuticals – one of the areas in which we are quite optimistic, despite the lack of coherent and enabling government policy. 
  • What impact AI will, or will not, have in our healthcare system this year. 

Are there issues not mentioned here that you think Spotlight should cover in 2026? Let us know by commenting below this article or by tagging us on BlueSky. 

*Low is the editor of Spotlight. 

Republished from Spotlight under a Creative Commons licence.

Read the original article.

Categories : Healthcare Politics and Regulations PaediatricsTags : 2 Comments

Warning: Selenium and Zinc Picolinate-containing Products for Children

On By ModernMedia
Photo by Towfiqu barbhuiya on Unsplash

Pretoria, 8 January 2026 – The South African Health Products Regulatory Authority (SAHPRA) has been made aware of products in the market containing Zinc picolinate (as a source material for zinc) and/or Selenium intended for use in children.

Both of these ingredients have been identified in the Guidance (SAHPRA Guideline 7.04 / SAHPGL-PEM-COMP-04 v5 CM SE Health Supplements) issued by SAHPRA as not permitted in health supplements for children (persons under the age of 18).

The safety concerns related to children are as follows:

  1. Zinc picolinate, at any supplemental dose, can cause side effects which include indigestion, diarrhoea, headache, nausea, and vomiting. As the bio-availability of Zn from Zn-picolinate is variable due to multiple factors, the risk of side effects may be higher and unpredictable, and it is unsuitable as a source of elemental zinc supplementation in children; and
  2. Selenium, when supplemented to children, represents a safety concern considering the potential differences in selenium daily intake between different population groups. While selenium intake is a viable requirement for children in areas of famine or dietary restriction, the potential adverse effects of selenium overdose are of concern when provided in general supplements/medicines intended for children.

The products currently on the market are marketed and sold, among others, as “Immune boosters” for children, with the main active ingredients being Zinc (when derived from Zinc picolinate) and/or Selenium intended for use in children. These products are indicated for supporting the treatment of colds, flu, diarrhoea, and skin-related conditions, rendering the products in question medicines that require registration by SAHPRA.

Any medicine sold that contains Zinc picolinate or Selenium intended for use in children does not qualify as a Category D (complementary) medicine. As such, their sale as a Category D medicine is illegal. Therefore, with effect from the date of publication of this notice, all selenium and zinc picolinate-containing products intended for use in children shall be subject to registration as a medicine falling into Category A, as defined in Section 14(2) of the Medicines and Related Substances Act, 101 of 1965, and need to be submitted to SAHPRA for registration. The sale of Category D (complementary) medicines containing Zinc picolinate or Selenium and intended for use in children must be withdrawn from the market within six (6) months of the date of this publication.

Advice for health professionals and distributors:

SAHPRA requests that Health professionals cease all distribution, selling, and/or dispensing and remove all selenium and zinc picolinate-containing products intended for use in children from stores, storage facilities, and shelves.

Members of the public are urged to return products containing Zinc Picolinate and Selenium when intended for use in children, to their pharmacist, supplying warehouse, or distributor.

Reporting side effects

Public and healthcare professionals are encouraged to report any side effects after using a health product by using the Med Safety App. Your report will contribute to our monitoring of these health products.

Source: SAHPRA

Categories : Healthcare Politics and RegulationsTags :

NHS Doctors Going on Strike just as ‘Superflu’ is Set to Sweep UK

On By ModernMedia
Source: Pixabay CC0

NHS doctors are going on strike just as the UK is facing a surge in cases of “superflu”, which would have by itself placed an even greater burden than the public health service usually faces this time of year as services are stretched thin.

According to The Guardian, this is the 14th such action since disputes over junior doctors’ pay and jobs began in March 2023. Since then, they have won the right to be called “resident doctors” in line with the US because the British Medical Association (BMA) felt that the previous term was demeaning and misleading.

Resentment between government and doctors grows

After the government’s last offer was rejected, BMA members voted in an online ballot 84% in favour of industrial action. UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer called the walkouts “irresponsible” amid a surge in super-flu cases. Meanwhile, the UK’s Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, Wes Streeting, asked junior doctors to ignore the BMA and show up for work.  He dismissed the resident doctors’ 26% pay claim as a “fantasy demand”, and has also said that the strike could be “the Jenga piece” that finally brings about the collapse of the NHS just when it is needed the most.

The strike will begin on Wednesday 17th December at 7am and will continue until the following Monday at 7am.

The magnitude of the problem has echoes of South Africa’s own struggles to find training placements – but at a far larger scale. Some 30 000 newly graduated doctors are having to compete for around 10 000 training posts. Even the government’s best offer could only add 2000 extra jobs.

Dr Jack Fletcher, the chair of the BMA’s resident doctors committee, said: “There are no new jobs in this offer. He has simply cannibalised those jobs which already existed for the sake of ‘new’ jobs on paper. Neither was there anything on what Mr Streeting has said is a journey to restoring our pay – that has clearly hit the buffers.”

Is ‘superflu’ even real?

Experts have however cast doubt on the UK government’s narrative of a dangerous new influenza mutation a “superflu”. Mathematician Christina Pagel, University College London professor, said that the “superflu” term was based on “highly misleading statistics” and that the flu season had merely arrived a few weeks early.

Government spin or not, the strikes have sounded alarm in the NHS, which is struggling to deal cope with a record flu hospitalisations for this time of year, filling 1700 beds. More and more hospitals are unable to contend with these numbers and having to declare a “critical incident”.

Categories : Healthcare Politics and RegulationsTags :

EDITORIAL | What has Actually Happened on NHI This Year?

On By ModernMedia

By Spotlight

It is not a stretch to say that the NHI Act has been one of the most controversial pieces of legislation in post-apartheid South Africa.

Since President Cyril Ramaphosa signed it into law in May 2024, just two weeks ahead of the national and provincial elections, at least nine different court cases have been launched against the Act, or specific provisions in the Act. None of those cases have made it through the courts and it seems likely some might be combined. 

In one preliminary to the bigger court battles, the North Gauteng High Court in Pretoria ordered Ramaphosa to provide the record of his decision to sign the act, but the President is challenging that order. 

A subtext to the torrent of court cases is the sense that it is only through litigation that the NHI Act might be scrapped, or that some of the most controversial provisions in it might be repealed. The alternative to litigation, political compromise, for now seems dead in the water. There was some hope for such compromise around a year ago when Business Unity South Africa and several healthcare worker groups pushed government for a change in course – but while the Presidency seemed open to considering changes, the health minister did not, and eventually the ANC, and government with it, decided to buckle down behind their current NHI plans. 

The door to political compromise could of course reopen should the balance of political power in the country change – as it will surely do after the 2029 elections, if not earlier. 

To the courts then 

There has been much media coverage of the various court cases challenging the NHI Act. Understandably, a lot of the public statements were aimed at drumming up public support for the various points of view. In the end, the courts will hopefully look past the rhetoric and politicking and judge the cases on their merits. 

This is why in recent months Spotlight put substantial resources into combing through seemingly endless court papers and chatting to a variety of lawyers in an attempt to sift the wheat from the chaff. As with many other court cases we’ve reported on, we suspect the various NHI-related cases will in the end turn on just a few key legal questions. In a special two-part series, we tried to pin down what these key legal questions are likely to be – you can see part 1 here and part 2 here. (Thank you to the three lawyers we quote in the article, as well as those who shared their views, but opted not to be named and quoted.) 

In our view, this crystallisation of the legal case against the NHI Act, and/or specific provisions in the Act, is the most notable NHI-related development this year. After all, a major ruling against the Act could make much else moot. 

Other NHI developments 

Meanwhile, the Department of Health is moving ahead on the assumption that NHI will be implemented as envisaged in the Act. The first formal step towards setting out the proposed governance structure and processes of the NHI Fund is underway with draft regulations that were published in the Government Gazette in March. Amongst others, the regulations provide for the appointment of the board of the NHI Fund, the fund’s chief executive officer, and for a benefits advisory committee and a healthcare benefits pricing committee. In the background here is the fact that, until the NHI Fund has been established as a public entity, it cannot be awarded a budget by parliament. 

One source of funding for NHI could be the phasing out of medical scheme tax credits. This is according to a presentation by the National Health Department’s NHI lead, Dr Nicholas Crisp, who was addressing the Standing Committee on Appropriations in the National Assembly. The presentation notes that medical scheme tax credits could raise as much as R34bn for the NHI Fund by 2027/28. At the moment, eligible beneficiaries receive medical scheme tax credits to the value of R364 per month for the primary member, R364 for the first dependant, and R246 for each additional dependant. The rough idea is that tax credits would first be phased out for high-income earners. This would eventually be followed by the state scrapping medical scheme subsidies to civil servants. 

But Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana seems unconvinced. He told BusinessDay: “It’s actually an attack on the middle class”. 

And indeed, the proposed scrapping of medical aid subsidies has added fuel to suggestions that government is intentionally undermining the viability of private healthcare in South Africa. A set of recommendations on how to better regulate the country’s private healthcare sector remains largely unimplemented six years after being published. Government did publish draft regulations for tariff determination in the private sector in February, but, as we recently reported, those draft regulations have now been withdrawn. In fact, those draft regulations were so poorly thought out that one wonders whether they were a serious attempt at addressing the issue in the first place. 

According to Crisp’s presentation, NHI could take “10, 15 or more” years to implement. There is some welcome realism in this. Rather absurdly, Section 57 of the NHI Act still states that it will be introduced in two phases, between 2023 and 2026, and between 2026 and 2028. 

Several experts have suggested to Spotlight that, mainly for financial reasons, NHI is essentially dead in the water and that the more serious people in the government and the ANC know this. Few are however willing to say this publicly. Others, like Crisp and Health Minister Dr Aaron Motsoaledi, would of course beg to differ, and mean it. 

Not the only solution 

One thing that should not get lost in all this is that things really do need to change. Apart from being extremely unequal, much of the healthcare system in South Africa is deeply dysfunctional. But Motsoaledi is wrong when he suggests that the specific system set out in the NHI Act is the only possible solution. As we’ve previously argued, there are other viable paths to universal health coverage, even if the current set of leaders in the ANC refuses to seriously consider them. 

One of the great tragedies of NHI is that for all the noise, we have never really had an informed public debate about the policy options and the reasons for going with one set of health reforms rather than another. There were few things as depressing as watching members of parliament’s portfolio committee for health reducing someone’s nuanced and constructive feedback on the Bill to a simple question of whether someone is for or against NHI. The ANC of course had a majority in parliament prior to the 2024 elections, so maybe there was a sense that they did not need to listen and do the hard work of engaging and bringing people along with them. 

Either way, it now seems likely that in 2026, the courts will have to make one or more landmark rulings that will determine the future of NHI. We have some idea of what the key issues will be on which those cases will turn, but as to how the courts will decide, your guess is as good as ours. 

Republished from Spotlight under a Creative Commons licence.

Read the original article.

Categories : Expert Opinion Healthcare Politics and RegulationsTags :

#InsideTheBox with Dr Andy Gray | Where Are We on the Road to More Coherent Cannabis Regulation?

On By ModernMedia
#InsideTheBox is a column by Dr Andy Gray, a pharmaceutical sciences expert at the University of KwaZulu-Natal and Co-Director of the WHO Collaborating Centre on Pharmaceutical Policy and Evidence Based Practice. (Photo: Supplied)

By Andy Gray

There has been much confusion and misunderstandings about how cannabis and associated products are regulated in South Africa, with government’s own missteps adding to the uncertainty. In his last #InsideTheBox column for the year, Dr Andy Gray clearly sets out the current legal and regulatory situation and where we’re heading.

There is a fundamental assumption that underpins much of the legislation relating to pharmacologically active substances, especially those that have neuropsychiatric effects. Some are recognised as having legitimate medicinal uses, in humans and/or animals, and so are regulated as medicines. Others are deemed to have no legitimate medicinal uses, and so their possession and use is prohibited or even criminalised. Some of these substances are obtained from natural sources, such as plants or fungi, and some have been recognised and used since antiquity, precisely for their effects, both for pleasure and ritual.

Cannabis is a prime example, which grows on all continents other than Antarctica and has been used for a wide variety of purposes, both for its pharmacological actions and for its physical attributes, as a source of fibre and nutrition.

South Africa has a long and complex history with regard to cannabis. It was the South African government which proposed to the League of Nations Dangerous Drugs Committee in 1923 that cannabis be subjected to international regulation. That status remains in place, in terms of the Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs, 1961, to which South Africa is a signatory. Schedule I to the Convention, which is maintained by the International Narcotics Control Board, includes “the flowering or fruiting tops of the cannabis plant”, as well as “the separated resin, crude or purified, obtained from the cannabis plant”. Parties to the Convention are required to “adopt such measures as may be necessary to prevent the misuse of, and illicit traffic in, the leaves of the cannabis plant”. Cultivation of cannabis is to be regulated in the same manner as that applied to opium poppies, but with an important caveat: “This Convention shall not apply to the cultivation of the cannabis plant exclusively for industrial purposes (fibre and seed) or horticultural purposes.”

As a result, cannabis was for many years listed as a Schedule 7 substance in terms of South Africa’s Medicines and Related Substances Act, 1965, and also included in the “Undesirable Dependence-Producing Substances” in terms of the Drugs and Drug Trafficking Act, 1992. While exceptional access was allowed for research, analysis or use by a particular patient, substances in those categories could not ordinarily be possessed or sold.

That entire legal construct was overturned by a 2018 Constitutional Court judgment which declared the relevant sections of both laws unconstitutional “to the extent that they criminalise the use or possession in private or cultivation in a private place of cannabis by an adult for his or her own personal consumption in private”. The court allowed legislators a period of 24 months to remedy the situation.

THC and CBD

Although the cannabis plant contains over 100 identifiable chemical components, two are of particular importance. Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) is the psychoactive component, whereas cannabidiol (CBD) is not psychoactive. At higher doses, cannabidiol has been shown to be effective in the management of some paediatric epilepsy syndromes.

The first change made to comply with the Constitutional Court judgment involved moving THC to Schedule 6 (alongside morphine, for example) and CBD to Schedule 4 (as a prescription medicine). The Schedule 6 inscription also included an exception to allow adult use, echoing the wording in the court judgment. The control measures applicable to a Schedule 6 substance (such as the need for a prescription) do not apply when “raw cannabis plant material is cultivated, possessed and consumed by an adult, in private for personal consumption”. The Schedule 4 inscription also allowed for low-dose CBD products (containing a maximum of 20mg per day and 600mg per pack) to be regulated as a complementary medicine, provided the labelling made only a low-risk claim (a general health enhancement or health maintenance claim or a claim of relief from minor symptoms).

The South African Health Products Regulatory Authority (SAHPRA) has issued just over a hundred licences for the cultivation and export of cannabis for medicinal purposes. These licences are for the preparation of the raw material from which medicines could be made, but no THC-containing products have yet been registered in South Africa. SAHPRA does not report on the number of section 21 permits issued to individual patients seeking access to THC-containing medicines, nor on the sources of unregistered medicines approved in that manner (section 21 permits allows for access to medicines not registered by SAHPRA).

https://embed.bsky.app/embed/did:plc:jonfyv7sw4yyacspczyvtbrf/app.bsky.feed.post/3lzps6oplvs25?id=8003957909918781&ref_url=https%253A%252F%252Fwww.spotlightnsp.co.za%252F2025%252F12%252F03%252Finsidethebox-with-dr-andy-gray-where-are-we-on-the-road-to-more-coherent-cannabis-regulation%252F&colorMode=dark

SAHPRA’s cannabis cultivation permits do not allow the sale of cannabis products directly to the public. SAHPRA has not issued licences to any retail outlets for cannabis or cannabis-containing products. Retail outlets claiming to be licensed “dispensaries” are therefore operating illegally.

In 2024, the Schedules were again updated, with this exception inserted: “in raw cannabis plant material cultivated and possessed in accordance with a permit issued in terms of the Plant Improvement Act (Act 11 of 2018) and processed products manufactured from such material, intended for agricultural or industrial purposes, including the manufacture of consumer items or products which have no pharmacological action or medicinal purpose”.

The Plant Improvement Act, 2018, is intended to regulate the propagation and sale of particular plants, setting quality standards for economically important varieties, such as wheat. In November 2025, the Minister of Agriculture, Land Reform and Rural Development issued regulations in terms of this Act, setting a THC limit of 2% for the leaves and flowering heads of cannabis plants considered to be “hemp” (low-THC cannabis). That action provides the clarity required to interpret the Schedules to the Medicines Act and creates a process for the issuing of “hemp” permits for the cultivation and sale of low-THC cannabis for industrial applications.

‘A work in progress’

Bringing the Drugs and Drug Trafficking Act into alignment with the Constitutional Court judgment has been far more complex than the Medicines Act and is still a work in progress. The section of the Drugs Act which enabled the Minister of Justice to make schedules listing substances in different categories was found to be unconstitutional in 2020. Future changes to the schedules will require an Act of Parliament. Distinct from the Schedules to the Medicines Act, these lists designate which substances, for example are considered “Undesirable Dependence-Producing Substances”, the possession of which may be a criminal offence.

Instead, the Minister of Justice and Correctional Services tabled a separate Bill in 2019, which was finally passed as the Cannabis for Private Purposes Act, 2024. While that Act has been assented to by the President, it has not yet been promulgated and no regulations have been issued. The legislation is therefore not yet in operation. Regulations are needed, for example, to specify the amounts of cannabis that can be cultivated, possessed or transported. Most importantly, though enabling the possession or cultivation of cannabis in a private place, and therefore personal consumption by an adult, the Act does not enable the commercialisation of cannabis for “recreational” or “adult use”, as is the case with alcoholic beverages or tobacco products.

South Africa’s Cannabis Master Plan, which envisages three separate value chains, covering medicinal cannabis, hemp, and adult use, is now being driven by the Department of Trade, Industry and Competition (DTIC). The DTIC plans to submit a Hemp and Cannabis Commercialisation Policy to Cabinet by April 2026 and to table an Overarching Cannabis Bill by mid-2027.

The 2018 Constitutional Court judgment overturned almost a century of established practice. While the evidence for the medicinal value of cannabis and specific cannabinoids is still scanty, the assumption that such products have no medicinal value at all is no longer tenable. As with all pharmaceutical products, this is a highly regulated market with high barriers to entry.

An industrial market for low-THC cannabis is already well established and the necessary steps to enable its growth are now in place. However, the ill-informed ban on the inclusion of any cannabis components in foodstuffs, which was issued and then rapidly repealed in 2025, is indicative of the lack of coherence in government policy. The challenge remains the commercialisation of an adult use market, and whether that will enable the involvement of the small-scale rural growers who have traditionally met demand for the product.

Cannabis policy therefore remains in flux, and the entire legislative process has been marked by missteps, missed steps, reverses, ambivalence and confusion. Some pieces of the picture are in place, but others remain uncertain or incomplete.

*Dr Gray is a Senior Lecturer at the University of KwaZulu-Natal and Co-Director of the WHO Collaborating Centre on Pharmaceutical Policy and Evidence Based Practice. This is part of a series of #InsideTheBox columns he is writing for Spotlight.

Disclosure: Gray serves on three technical advisory committees at the South African Health Products Regulatory Authority and previously chaired the Cannabis Working Group.

Note: Spotlight aims to deepen public understanding of important health issues by publishing a variety of views on its opinion pages. The views expressed in this article are not necessarily shared by the Spotlight editors.

Republished from Spotlight under a Creative Commons licence.

Read the original article.

Categories : Healthcare Politics and Regulations Metabolic DisordersTags :

Patients Left Vulnerable as Diabetes Supplies Dwindle

On By ModernMedia
Photo by isens usa on Unsplash

By Joan van Dyk

Getting to grips with rising diabetes rates is arguably one of the most urgent tasks for South Africa’s public healthcare system, but the setbacks keep coming. While some communities are facing shortages of blood sugar meters and insulin pens, a smaller wave of insulin vial shortages is now on the horizon.

In August, activist Eksoda Mazibuko was sure that years of community organising had finally yielded tangible results for people with diabetes in Hluvukani, a town in Mpumalanga.

The 35-year-old had just received R50 000 from Good Morning Angels, Jacaranda FM’s community upliftment project. It was more than enough for him to buy blood sugar meters and test strips for the fifty-person support group he runs at Tintswalo Hospital in Acornhoek, where stock had run out.

When the body can’t make or use insulin – the hormone that keeps blood sugar in check – people have to watch their levels, so they know how to eat and medicate themselves. It’s a process held together by medicines and an ecosystem of tools ⁠such as meters, strips, pens, lancets, needles, syringes, which unravels when one part is missing. Over time, poorly controlled blood sugar causes cumulative damage to one’s body that can result in severe complications such as amputation, blindness, kidney damage, and stroke.

Most people who take pills to treat diabetes need monitoring from time to time, but for the majority of those who are on insulin treatment, it is essential. People with diabetes who are taking insulin must check their blood sugar levels multiple times a day. To do this, they need glucometers – devices that measure the sugar levels in a drop of blood. But access to glucometers is a challenge. Spotlight previously reported that not everyone who needs these home testing devices is given one and those who do receive them rarely get enough test strips and lances to enable proper monitoring of their blood sugar levels.

Without tests and test strips, people in Hluvukani had no way of knowing how to adjust their insulin. Injecting the wrong amount could in extreme cases result in someone going into a coma or dying.

Mazibuko himself, who was diagnosed in 2003 and has always needed insulin, knows how terrifying it can be when monitoring tools are out of reach.

When the devices and test strips finally arrived, he shared a celebratory photo on social media. Excited messages streamed in on WhatsApp, but among them was an upsetting note from a government pharmacist: “You should have asked me before you ordered.”

Unbeknownst to the hospital staff that helped Mazibuko choose the device, the national government’s supplier would be changing, as it does every three years or so when a new tender is awarded. That means state pharmacies would soon stock a different kind of test strip.

Glucometers generally can’t interpret test strips from a different brand or model, so the glucometers that he’d already started to hand out would soon be useless.

“They were already open so I couldn’t send them back. After I worked so hard to get those machines for my community members,” said Mazibuko. “It was heartbreaking.”

According to a report from the Clinton Health Access Initiative, in poorer countries companies make most of their profit on the test strips rather than the glucometers used to read the strips. Spotlight understands that some companies go as far as giving away the devices to lock people into using their specific test strips. According to Cathy Haldane, who leads the non-communicable diseases team at FIND (a global diagnostics alliance), there have been some efforts toward encouraging universal interoperability of test strips, but these efforts haven’t gathered much steam.

Why diabetes is still a national guessing game

South Africa is one of the few countries that buys blood glucose meters and test strips en masse, but there are still lots of people who are treated with insulin who don’t have access to them.

One reason for this is that the national health department buys machines and strips for the public sector but it’s up to provinces to manage stock at pharmacies and clinics, explains Haldane.

A lack of good quality diabetes data could be making harder for health department staff to predict how much they’ll need, she says. Unlike the country’s digital HIV & TB tracking system, there’s no centralised database for diabetes and other chronic diseases such as high blood pressure and cancer. As Spotlight previously reported in-depth, there is a serious lack of reliable diabetes data for South Africa. Haldane says, “that’s how people on insulin treatment who should get a machine and monthly test strips end up going without”.

Not having reliable data leaves national planners, doctors and nurses in the dark about how many people need blood sugar monitors, where the system is failing and how the country is faring against targets outlined in the health department’s action plan for chronic diseases, which lapses in 2027. The plan states that by 2027, the health department wants at least 50% of people receiving care for diabetes to have their blood sugar under control. The available data though, all from pockets of academic research, suggests that we are falling far short of this target.

The diabetes data that is available paints a harrowing picture.

According to a StatsSA report on non-communicable diseases, diabetes was the leading underlying cause of death for women and second biggest underlying cause of death for men in 2018. While other reports suggest that diabetes is lower on the list of top killers, it clearly does claim many lives in the country. The International Diabetes Federation estimates that about half of people with diabetes in South Africa haven’t been diagnosed.

If trends continue, 2018 research suggests the treatment, management and complications of type two diabetes could cost the government as much as R35-billion by 2030.

In rural KZN, insulin pen stockouts persist

Meanwhile, more than 700 kilometers from Hluvukani, in KwaZulu-Natal’s rural King Cetshwayo district, some healthcare staff are using their own money to help keep diabetes services going.

Indira Govender, a doctor affiliated with the Rural Doctors Association of South Africa (Rudasa) who works in the area, says clinic managers are often the ones buying new batteries for blood sugar meters used in the facility and by patients.

The devices use the coin-like batteries also used in some watches, which aren’t easy to find in far flung areas.

Govender worries about the patients on insulin who still have to use a glass vial and syringe to inject themselves. “Not everybody has a fridge to store the insulin in. People struggle to draw up the right amount of insulin, sometimes because they can’t see well,” says Govender.

South Africa ran out of pens in 2024 when the health department’s longtime supplier, Novo Nordisk, stopped manufacturing pens prefilled with the cheapest form of insulin. The news came as global demand surged for one of Novo Nordisk’s long-acting diabetes medicines, semaglutide, because it was shown to also be effective for weight loss. Semaglutide is also provided in pens rather than vials.

In a 2024 letter to Novo Nordisk’s chief executive officer, MSF demanded that the pharma giant either ensure continued supply of the cheapest insulin pens in South Africa or that it offer a newer kind of pen at $1 each. That’s the amount that MSF’s research found would cover production costs, a fair profit margin and an allowance for tax.

The newer pens are filled with a form of insulin that takes effect faster and lasts for longer than previous versions. Novo Nordisk signed a deal in May in which it commits to providing these pens to South Africa until 2027. The department was charged just under $4 (around R75) per pen.

At the government clinic where Govender works in KwaZulu-Natal, however, insulin pens have reportedly not returned to pharmacy shelves.

“We haven’t had pens here since at least 2024,” says Govender.

The KwaZulu-Natal health department did not respond to Spotlight’s queries about the delivery delays.

Local consequences of global disruptions

While some communities are still waiting for insulin pens, a smaller wave of vial shortages is on its way for South Africa, according to an October circular.

Novo Nordisk told the health department to expect six to eight week delays in the delivery of short-acting, medium-acting and longer-acting insulin sold in 10ml vials. The department did not respond to Spotlight’s queries, but the circular listed four alternative prefilled pens that are available and expects stock to stabilise by January 2026.

One of the listed alternatives, Novo Nordisk’s NovoMix30, is also on a list of insulin pens and vials that will be discontinued in 2026, according to a directive issued by the health ministry in New Zealand.

No such directive has been issued by South Africa’s health department. Candice Sehoma, advocacy advisor for MSF Access in Southern Africa, says she would be surprised if the country avoids it.

It’s part of a concerning pattern of shortages of essential medicines worldwide, she says.

“We’re seeing more and more companies deprioritising insulin and discontinuing affordable medicines,” says Sehoma.

When there’s insulin but no food

While his stock of test strips lasts, Mazibuko takes them along when he visits members of his support group in Hluvukani.

They could technically find matching strips in the private sector, but they’re likely to be too expensive. A 2024 study found that for someone earning South Africa’s minimum wage, a single blood-sugar test in the private sector costs more than an hour of work, and a month of basic diabetes supplies can swallow three full days’ wages.

Many of the people on Mazibuko’s route are facing far more serious problems than the loss of glucometers. Those who aren’t working are often not taking their medication well either, Mazibuko says. “They don’t have food so they skip breakfast and also skip their insulin because they’re scared.”

Injecting insulin on an empty stomach can cause a sudden blood sugar crash that could lead to dizziness, confusion or a seizure.

Mazibuko is working on a skills programme to help these people make a living that might also protect them from lapses in basic supplies at government health facilities, which he claims happens often.

“Sometimes you go to the clinic, they tell you that they’ve run out of insulin, or they tell you to buy your own needles and syringes. You will have to do that with borrowed money,” says Mazibuko.

The Mpumalanga health department also did not respond to Spotlight’s requests for comment.

Republished from Spotlight under a Creative Commons licence.

Read the original article.

Categories : Healthcare Politics and RegulationsTags :

SAHPRA Accepted as a Member of the International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH)

On By ModernMedia
Photo by Myriam Zilles on Unsplash

The South African Health Products Regulatory Authority (SAHPRA) has officially been accepted as a member of the International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH), following an ICH assessment of compliance with requirements for membership, including a formal presentation outlining SAHPRA’s interest, progress, and milestones in implementing ICH principles.

The ICH is a unique global body that brings together regulatory authorities and the pharmaceutical industry to align scientific and technical standards for the registration of medicines. Since its establishment in 1990, it has evolved to support an increasingly globalised pharmaceutical environment. Its mission is to promote worldwide harmonisation to ensure that safe, effective, and high-quality medicines are developed and registered efficiently. This harmonisation is achieved through the development of ICH Guidelines, which are formulated through scientific consensus between regulators and industry experts. Successful adoption relies heavily on regulators’ commitment to implement these final Guidelines within their national systems.

The ICH Assembly met in person on 18-19 November 2025 in Singapore, in parallel with meetings of 12 Working Groups and preceded by meetings of the ICH Management Committee (MC) and the MedDRA Steering Committee (SC).

“ICH is delighted to welcome NAFDAC, Nigeria, and SAHPRA, South Africa, as new ICH Members, in addition to two new Observers: DIGEMAPS, Dominican Republic, and Philippine FDA, Philippines, bringing ICH to a total of 25 Members and 41 Observers.”

Welcoming SAHPRA’s membership, CEO Dr Boitumelo Semete-Makokotlela said:
“This is a significant milestone for the South African Health Products Regulatory Authority. Membership of the ICH strengthens our commitment to the three pillars of safety, quality, and efficacy, while ensuring that our processes remain resource-efficient. This development allows SAHPRA to benchmark its regulatory practices against global best practice for the benefit of all people living in South Africa.”