A South African clinical study that began in a research unit in Gqeberha (PE), Eastern Cape, has transformed global treatment of drug-resistant tuberculosis. Furthermore, the study’s findings were published this week in the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM), the highest-ranked medical journal in the world.
The publication recognises that this research study has set the global standard for TB care.
The BEAT Tuberculosis clinical study, conducted at the Clinical Health Research Unit (CHRU) Isango Lethemba TB Research Unit in the Eastern Cape and King Dinizulu Hospital Complex in KwaZulu-Natal, enrolled more than 400 participants over two years during the Covid-19 pandemic.
The study was executed by the University of the Witwatersrand in collaboration with the National Department of Health and funded by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID).
“This project has gone full circle,” says Dr Francesca Conradie, principal investigator of BEAT Tuberculosis and a researcher at the Clinical Health Research Unit (CHRU), University of the Witwatersrand. “The results from this trial have changed international guidelines. Being published in the New England Journal of Medicine is proof that South Africa produces world-class research that improves the lives of patients globally.”
Treatment for the whole family
The primary aim of BEAT Tuberculosis was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of a novel, shortened treatment regimen for DR-TB compared with the established standard of care. The standard treatment at the time required a seven-drug regimen administered over a minimum of nine months. BEAT Tuberculosis tested a streamlined regimen of four to five medications, including the newer agents bedaquiline and delamanid, administered over six months.
The BEAT Tuberculosis trial enrolled children, pregnant women and breastfeeding mothers alongside adults. These former groups are usually excluded from clinical research. The result is a treatment regimen that can be used across the entire family.
“This is a one-size-fits-all treatment regimen,” explains Conradie. “Adherence is much easier when the three-year-old, the teenager, the mother and the father are all receiving treatment of similar duration and composition. That simplicity saves lives.”
The study enrolled 10 pregnant women. All 10 women gave birth to healthy babies, and nine of them were successfully treated. BEAT Tuberculosis has since been cited internationally as a model for inclusive clinical research methodology, and the findings have influenced World Health Organization policy on the treatment of DR-TB globally, including for pregnant women and children.
South Africa’s National Clinical Advisory Committee already reviews and approves the regimen for pregnant women presenting with Drug-Resistant TB, while other provinces are adopting the treatment, particularly when treating children.
During 2024, South Africa had 249,000 people who were infected with active tuberculosis, and 54 000 died from the disease,” says Professor Norbert Ndjeka, Chief Director: TB Control and Management, National Department of Health. “Not only did BEAT TB produce world-class research, but it is also being implemented progressively across South Africa and globally and is internationally recognised. South Africa has accomplished something exceptional.”
Tuberculosis (TB) is not a medical mystery, writes AI Diagnostics CEO, Braden van Breda. It’s a detection failure. And with technology like AI at our disposal, he believes the MedTech industry has the power to step up and fix it.
Tuberculosis bacteria. Credit: CDC
TB remains the deadliest infectious disease in the world, but it’s not killing people indiscriminately, it’s killing people in poor, developing countries.
Data from the World Health Organization makes this very clear. In 2024, most TB cases were concentrated in developing regions, especially South-East Asia, the Western Pacific, and Africa. In South Africa, an estimated 54 000 people died of TB in 2024. That’s a soccer stadium full of people wiped out by TB in a single year. Meanwhile, the Americas accounted for just 3.3% of global cases and Europe 1.9%.
The danger is that we get complacent about these numbers because we’re so used to hearing them. It’s not normal that people’s loved ones are dying from TB by the tens of thousands in some parts of the world, while in others, the incidence is low enough to be almost negligible.
Detection is the crisis
We already know what causes TB. We know how it spreads, how to diagnose it, and how to treat it. South Africa is losing this fight because the tools we currently have don’t catch cases early enough.
Since TB is easiest to treat (and least likely to spread) when it’s found early, the result compounds. Too many people are only diagnosed once they become seriously ill. By then, they’ve already infected others, and the cost and effort of accessing care often becomes a barrier in itself.
The science is there; the failure now lies in access to quality screening. The question we need to ask ourselves is whether we’re serious about bringing healthcare to people instead of forcing people to chase healthcare.
Start designing TB screening around the communities that need it most
Too much of our TB diagnostic infrastructure remains concentrated in too few facilities, and that depends on expensive equipment, medical specialists, and referral pathways.
For many people, especially in rural areas and poorer communities, getting to a hospital means losing a day’s wages, while having to pay for transport they can’t afford. The result is that people wait or don’t go at all. In 2024, only about 184 000 of the estimated 249 000 South Africans who fell ill with TB were diagnosed and started on treatment. That leaves around 65 000 people who were missed altogether.
This is why community-level screening matters so much. We can’t build specialist diagnostic centres next to every rural clinic. Even if we could, we don’t have enough specialists to run them. The answer is to put simpler, portable, and locally workable screening tools into the hands of frontline healthcare workers, especially nurses in primary care settings.
South Africa can’t wait around to be rescued
If the bottleneck is access, then innovation has to begin where access fails. That means building around the healthcare system we have, not the one we wish we had. How do we equip the nurse at the overcrowded community clinic? If we’re serious about combating TB, that’s the question we have to answer.
It’s also why South Africa can’t keep assuming that imported solutions from European or American healthcare systems will automatically fit our realities. We need tools designed for our burden of disease, clinic environments, and constraints. The countries carrying the heaviest burden should also be shaping the next generation of practical, scalable solutions.
The local MedTech sector needs to decide whether it’s serious about that responsibility. It’s one thing to produce impressive technology for conferences and investor decks, but can it be used in a crowded community clinic by a healthcare worker at the end of an 18-hour shift? If the answer is no, it’s not solving the real problem.
When a curable disease is killing tens of thousands of people, we can’t afford to sit around and wait to solve the problem. Thanks to advances in technology, the tools to close the screening gap are no longer beyond our reach. Failing to use them is inexcusable.
A new national cohort study from Latvia, conducted in collaboration with researchers from the clinical tuberculosis infrastructure (ClinTB) at the German Center for Infection Research (DZIF) at the Research Center Borstel, Leibniz Lung Center (FZB), provides important insights into the treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB). The study shows that long-term disease-free survival rates are significantly higher than previous standard indicators suggest. The results, published in the renowned journal The Lancet Regional Health Europe, are based on the analysis of data from 1299 adult patients treated between 2005 and 2021.
Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis poses a significant challenge to healthcare systems worldwide. Whilst the effectiveness of treatment is traditionally assessed on the basis of treatment outcomes at the end of therapy, the new study shows that these criteria underestimate the actual long-term success of treatment. According to WHO standard definitions, only 4.8% of patients in Latvia were considered cured. However, during long-term follow-up, 76.9% of those affected remained permanently relapse-free.
The researchers linked clinical data with national registry information for long-term follow-up, enabling them, for the first time, to systematically evaluate long-term treatment outcomes in a former European country with a high incidence of MDR-TB. A key factor in treatment success was the use of at least three effective drugs in the individual treatment regimen.
Furthermore, the analysis showed that very short treatment durations of less than nine months, using the treatment options available at the time, were associated with an increased risk of relapse or death. Treatment durations of between ten and seventeen months, however, achieved comparable results to longer courses of treatment. After the end of the observation period, MDR-TB treatments became more effective. Today, the treatment duration for MDR-TB has aligned with the six months required for drug-sensitive tuberculosis.
“The study underscores the importance of long-term follow-up in MDR-TB and suggests that tuberculosis control programmes should broaden their measures of success. Including recurrence-free survival rates allows for a more realistic assessment of the quality of care and the actual benefit to patients,” says Sophie Meier, a medical PhD student at the FZB and the University of Lübeck under DZIF researcher Professor Christoph Lange.
“The findings also support the role of expert panels, known as consilia, in selecting treatments and assessing treatment success for MDR-TB. In Latvia, the decisions made by the consilium were significantly superior to the results obtained by applying WHO definitions for MDR-TB treatment outcomes. Consilia are also an element of effective ‘antimicrobial stewardship’ against the development of new antibiotic resistance,” says PD Dr Thomas Brehm from the FZB and University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), DZIF researcher and senior author of this study.
The findings of this study provide important impetus for future treatment strategies for MDR-TB and support the use of individualised treatment regimens with sufficiently effective drugs. Prospective studies are now required to test these findings in the context of new, shortened treatment regimens using modern active substances. If necessary, the definitions of treatment outcomes for MDR-TB will need to be revised.
Two new vaccines to prevent tuberculosis (TB) are safe for use in adults and children, but they do not offer protection against all forms of TB, finds a large trial from India published by The BMJ.
TB remains a major global public health concern. In 2023, an estimated 10.8 million people worldwide were reported to have TB and the rate of new cases increased by 4.6% between 2020 and 2020, highlighting the growing scale of the problem. BCG is currently the only licensed vaccine against TB. Yet although it is effective against severe forms of TB in young children, it does not offer protection for adolescents and adults.
To address this gap, researchers in India conducted a large trial to evaluate whether two new TB vaccines (VPM1002 and Immuvac) can protect against all forms of tuberculosis (pulmonary and extrapulmonary), prevent latent (dormant) infection, and generate an immune response against the TB bacterium.
The study enrolled 12 717 household contacts (aged 6 years and older) of recently diagnosed TB patients across 18 sites in six Indian states between July 2019 and December 2020.
Participants were randomly allocated to receive a first dose of either VPM1002, Immuvac, or a placebo (4 239 in each group) and were followed up for 38 months. A second dose was administered to 11,829 participants one month later. A total of 12 295 participants (96.7% of those enrolled) completed 38 months of follow-up.
While neither vaccine offered general protection against TB or prevented latent TB infection, both demonstrated an ability to prevent the progression to active TB in those who developed latent TB.
The researchers found that although both vaccines did not show effectiveness against all TB and pulmonary TB (PTB), one of the vaccines, VPM1002 showed effectiveness (50.4%) against extrapulmonary TB (EPTB) across all age groups, including those aged 36-60 years (79.5%). These findings suggest a potentially significant public health benefit, because extrapulmonary TB, which affects organs beyond the lungs, is often associated with a higher risk of mortality than pulmonary TB.
A promising key finding was the protection seen against TB in children, whereby VPM1002 provided protection against all TB, PTB and EPTB in the 6 to under 14 year age group, while Immuvac provided protection against EPTB only in the 6 to under 10 year age group.
However, neither vaccine protected children and adults who were underweight. This suggests that nutritional support may be needed along with vaccination, especially for younger children, report the authors.
Both vaccines were found to be safe and induced an immune response.
The researchers acknowledge that the covid-19 pandemic affected the study, leading to the exclusion of some participants who missed the second dose and sometimes delayed follow-ups. Furthermore, the findings may not apply in other countries or ethnicities.
Nevertheless, this was a large, well-designed study that reflects a real world scenario because it included both children and adults, regardless of pre-existing conditions like diabetes and risk factors, as reported by authors. Further research on commonly targeted high-risk groups for TB could be undertaken, they conclude.
Dr Jessica Hamuy Blanco, Product and Clinical Risk Executive at Dis-Chem
As the world marks World TB Day on 24 March under the theme “Yes! We can end TB!”, South Africa faces a clear challenge turning awareness into early action.
“TB is all around us,” says Dr Jessica Hamuy Blanco, Product and Clinical Risk Executive at Dis-Chem. “Many people don’t realise that exposure is common. The bacteria can lie dormant for years and only become active when the immune system is compromised.”
Despite widespread awareness, a critical gap remains between what people know about TB and how quickly they act on symptoms. This gap continues to shape outcomes for thousands living with this preventable and curable disease.
According to the World Health Organisation (WHO), approximately 249 000 people in South Africa developed tuberculosis in 2024.
TB remains close to home
Although preventable and curable, TB continues to spread quietly often because symptoms are ignored and treatment is delayed.
“People don’t always recognise the signs early enough or know where to seek help,” says Dr Hamuy Blanco. “This is where informed, trusted healthcare makes the difference.”
South Africa remains one of the countries hardest hit by TB globally. The disease is closely linked to HIV, with weakened immune systems increasing the risk of TB becoming active. At the same time, socio-economic realities such as overcrowding and limited access to healthcare continue to drive transmission.
Delayed diagnosis means individuals remain infectious for longer, placing families and communities at greater risk.
Early detection can change outcomes
Detecting TB early remains one of the most effective ways to reduce its spread and improve recovery. Treatment typically involves a six- to nine-month course of antibiotics, with strong success rates when completed. However early symptoms are often missed.
“The signs can be missed or ignored,” explains Dr Hamuy Blanco. “A persistent cough, fatigue, night sweats or weight loss are easy to dismiss as stress or a lingering illness. That delay gives TB time to spread.”
Creating space for early conversations, whether at a clinic, pharmacy or with a nurse can make the difference between early intervention and prolonged illness.
Finishing treatment is non-negotiable
Another major barrier to ending TB is interrupted treatment. Many patients begin to feel better within weeks and assume they are cured, while others struggle with side effects or the practicalities of repeated clinic visits.
“When treatment is stopped too soon, the bacteria are not fully eliminated,” says Dr Hamuy Blanco. “This is how drug-resistant TB develops, which is far more difficult and costly to treat.”
Supporting patients through the full course of treatment is essential, with clear communication and ongoing support improving adherence.
Bringing care closer to people
“Accessible healthcare is critical in closing the gap between awareness and action”, says Dr Hamuy Blanco. Retail health clinics and digital health platforms are increasingly helping to make care part of people’s everyday lives.
These routine touchpoints create opportunities for people to ask questions, seek advice and act early helping to normalise testing, reduce stigma and support patients throughout their treatment journey.
“Care needs to fit into people’s daily lives,” she adds. “It should be easy to access, easy to understand and supportive from start to finish.”
Turning intent into impact
TB is both preventable and curable, yet it continues to claim lives because of delayed action and incomplete treatment.
“Ending tuberculosis takes more than medicine. It requires a human-centred approach that supports people from early testing through to completed treatment. By breaking down stigma and acting sooner, South Africa can move from awareness to impact,” she concludes.
Associate Professor Angelique Kany Kany Luabeya speaks about TB vaccine trials and the introduction of TB vaccines in South Africa. (Photo: Supplied)
By Angelique Kany Kany Luabeya
The only tuberculosis vaccine we have is a century old and offers only limited efficacy in children. With leading South African researchers involved in the pivotal clinical trials of three new tuberculosis vaccine candidates, we are on the verge of a major breakthrough, writes Associate Professor Angelique Kany Kany Luabeya.
My uncle died of abdominal TB a few days ago, after facing repeated challenges in getting an accurate diagnosis. For him, the treatment started much too late. To many in his community, my uncle was a respected teacher, a breadwinner, a pillar of support and strength.
In 2026, why are people still dying from a preventable disease that continues to cause unnecessary deaths and hardship?
Why we urgently need a new TB vaccine should be obvious. For the millions who are sick, and for families living with the catastrophic loss of a loved one, the need is painfully clear.
Prior to the emergence of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, TB was the world’s deadliest infectious disease, killing more than 1.5 million people every year. While COVID-19 has since shown an epidemic downturn, TB’s toll remains devastatingly high.
Globally, an estimated 2 billion people are infected with the Mycobacterium tuberculosis that causes TB in humans. In this state, also known as latent TB infection, they do not have TB symptoms and are non-infectious, but the bacteria remain dormant in their bodies. Of these people, about 5 to 10% will go on to develop active TB when their immune system is no longer able to contain the bacteria. This means that they now have TB disease, sometimes without noticeable symptoms, and risks passing it to others. This could be a family member, a friend, or a stranger who happens to be nearby.
TB bacteria have coexisted with humans for millions of years. There is a cure, but treatment alone is not enough to stop transmission. TB mostly affects countries with limited resources because patients struggle to access care or are unable to complete treatment due to side effects or a lack of food to support the rigorous regimen of drugs they must take to cure them. In addition, the rise of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis is now fueling a global health crisis.
In South Africa, recent data from the World Health Organization’s (WHO) Global TB Report indicate progress, with a 57% reduction in new TB cases since 2015. However, TB mortality is still high and is concentrated mainly in poor and vulnerable communities. According to the WHO, TB still claims over 50 000 lives in South Africa every year. The burden is also unevenly distributed, with some geographic areas affected more than others.
A vaccine which prevents TB
Our hopes are now pinned on developing an efficacious vaccine which prevents people from developing TB disease. WHO modelling suggests that a vaccine which prevents most people with latent TB infection from progressing to active disease would have the most rapid impact on the epidemic in high‑burden countries.
The most urgent priorities for protection would be people living with HIV, healthcare workers at risk of workplace exposure, adolescents and young adults who are driving transmission, as well as those with comorbidities such as diabetes that increase their risk of TB diseases and negatively affect treatment outcomes.
The COVID-19 pandemic proved that when human survival is threatened, the scientific community can respond with breathtaking speed, developing multiple effective vaccines in under a year. Sadly, the urgency and resources allocated to finding an effective TB vaccine do not match the scale of its devastation.
For more than a century (since 1921), we have had only one licensed TB jab, which is the bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccine that is given at birth. Despite its limitations in preventing TB that infects the lungs – the main route of transmission – BCG remains a critical tool because it protects millions of babies from more serious forms of TB that can spread through the blood to the brain. But, clearly, the BCG vaccine is not enough.
Hope is on the horizon though, with several novel TB vaccines now in late-stage clinical trials. New vaccines or drugs are evaluated clinically in humans in steps, or phases, for safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy.
The most advanced is M72/AS01E (M72 for short), which is an adjuvanted subunit vaccine under development by the Gates Medical Research Institute and GlaxoSmithKline. In a phase 2 trial, this vaccine showed close to 50% efficacy in preventing TB disease in TB-infected people—the first time a vaccine has achieved this level of efficacy. A pivotal phase 3 trial of this vaccine has now completed enrolment of 20 000 volunteers, including 13 000 people in South Africa, with results expected in 2028. Developers typically apply for registration with regulatory authorities after successful phase 3 trials – so this study is the last big hurdle for this vaccine.
Another promising candidate is the MTBVAC vaccine, a live, whole, attenuated Mycobacterium tuberculosis vaccine developed by Biofabri, in partnership with the University of Zaragoza and sponsored by the International AIDS Vaccine Initiative. It is in a multi-country phase 2b trial in adults and adolescents and a phase 3 trial in newborns, including in South Africa.
BioNTech’s mRNA TB vaccine is also being evaluated in a phase 2a study in South Africa. Funded by BioNTech, this vaccine candidate harnesses mRNA technology, which has proved successful in the COVID-19 response.
Paving the way for acceptance and use
South African researchers are at the forefront of these TB vaccine efforts. Our strengths lie in our robust clinical trial capacity, world-class institutions, commitment to equitable solutions, and regulatory expertise, all of which help accelerate vaccine licensure. As a global policy leader, South Africa co-chairs the Finance and Access Working Group at the WHO TB Vaccine Accelerator Council, advocating for fair distribution and sustainable financing, and has recently co-hosted a vaccine preparedness workshop to position the country for the emergence of late-stage TB vaccines.
But the most important aspect to consider is the vaccine’s acceptability and uptake by a myriad of population groups at risk of TB. We learned from COVID-19 how misinformation can devastate vaccine uptake, leading to unnecessary morbidity and mortality. Confidence in new TB vaccines must be built to maximise impact. The context may be different—TB is an old, well-known enemy that affects people close to us. By involving South African communities in the early stages of vaccine trials, we can ensure their priorities are part of the development agenda.
While we continue to improve TB diagnosis and treatment, the hunt for an effective vaccine continues. After a century of fighting TB with only one vaccine and several antibiotics, we might be on the verge of a breakthrough that could finally shift the trajectory of this ancient and deadly disease.
*Associate Professor Angelique Kany Kany Luabeya is the clinical investigator on the M72 TB vaccine trials being conducted at the South African Tuberculosis Vaccine Initiative based at the University of Cape Town.
Disclosure: The Gates Medical Research Institute mentioned in this article is a non-profit organisation and subsidiary of the Gates Foundation. Spotlight receives funding from the Gates Foundation but is editorially independent – an independence that the editors guard jealously. Spotlight is a member of the South African Press Council.
Note: Spotlight aims to deepen public understanding of important health issues by publishing a variety of views on its opinion pages. The views expressed in this article are not necessarily shared by the Spotlight editors.
With their innovation of a small but powerful handheld device, researchers at the University of Pretoria (UP) are on course to redefine the tuberculosis (TB) screening process, which could ultimately help to combat the TB pandemic more effectively. TB is one of the deadliest infectious diseases worldwide, claiming more than 1.25 million lives each year, of which about 50 000 deaths occur in South Africa. It is the leading cause of death among people with HIV.
MARTI (mycolate antibody real-time immunoassay) is the name of the handheld device that can provide very high certainty that a person at risk does not have TB. Using just one drop of blood – and no laboratory – it is set to change the way TB is detected. It may even be adapted for use in both human and veterinary healthcare. The diagnostic is fast, accurate, affordable and – the intellectual part of it – proudly South African.
An internal validation trial was recently completed to confirm the accuracy of the test. These trial results show remarkable promise in terms of the specificity, sensitivity and accuracy of the diagnostic test, coming close to the range of targets set by the World Health Organization for the “perfect” test, making MARTI an ideal screening and diagnostic tool. An earlier trial demonstrated great potential in using this test to monitor TB treatment; these results were published in the journal Biomarkers in Medicine.
“Many people aren’t aware that TB doesn’t always sit in the lungs – it can be present in bones, joints and the brain,” says Professor Jan Verschoor, former research leader of UP’s Tuberculosis Research Group in the Department of Biochemistry, Genetics and Microbiology and now an emeritus professor of biochemistry who has been leading this discovery. “The ‘gold standard’ TB test that involves growing cultures from lung sputum can take about six weeks, by which time, many more people could have been infected by the patient or the patient’s health could have deteriorated beyond the prospect of cure. From a simple finger-prick blood sample, the MARTI test gives us a result in 30 minutes. This has profound cost and public health implications in a country like South Africa, where we conduct three to five million TB tests a year.
Tuberculosis bacteria. Credit: CDC
Caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis, this resilient bacterium has long evaded simple detection methods, particularly in regions where healthcare infrastructure is limited. But now, an unexpected hero has emerged in the war on TB: a molecule in the bacterium’s waxy coat – specifically its mycolic acid (MA) – holds the key. These wax-like substances form a nearly impenetrable barrier, making the bacterium both drug-resistant and difficult to detect.
But while other scientists focused on breaking through this barrier, Prof Verschoor took a different approach: what if the wax itself could be used to detect the disease? He was the first to demonstrate that antibodies to the waxes are reliable indicators of active TB, irrespective of whether someone had been vaccinated or was coinfected with HIV.
A key aspect of the innovation came from Carl Baumeister, a PhD candidate under Prof Verschoor. He made the leap from slow laboratory-based biosensing to a handheld device that detects anti-MA antibodies accurately and affordably in less than 30 minutes. The result is a test that’s as clever as it is simple and cost-effective.
Detecting these anti-MA antibodies requires sophisticated sensing technology: the surface of a screen-printed carbon electrode is pre-coated with a thin layer of MA. MARTI works by flowing a drop of blood over this electrode. If a patient has TB, the sensor detects these antibodies in the blood sample; if a patient does not have TB, no signal would be generated since there are no anti-MA antibodies in the blood sample.
“The device fits in the palm of your hand and requires only a single drop of blood – no sputum, no needles, no laboratory,” says Carl Baumeister, Head of Operations of the UP spin-off company MARTI TB Diagnostics. “This may become a game-changer to diagnose TB in paediatric and HIV-positive patients, where obtaining sputum samples is often neither feasible nor safe. The same could apply to the 20% of all extra-pulmonary cases.”
“If MARTI says you don’t have TB, you can trust it,” Baumeister says. “That’s a critical trait when trying to rule out cases during an outbreak or in mass screening campaigns, much like what was needed during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Unlike other TB diagnostics, MARTI offers something rare and powerful: near-perfect negative predictive value in typical screening applications.
The internal validation trial across six healthcare facilities in Tshwane was led by Prof Veronica Ueckermann, Head of Infectious Diseases at Steve Biko Academic Hospital and UP’s Faculty of Health Sciences.
“Collecting, transporting, processing and analysing the samples from the various sites within the temperature and time constraints of the validation trial protocol posed a significant logistical challenge – but we succeeded,” says Mosa Molatseli, a senior research scientist who heads up the MARTI laboratory.
Recognising its potential, UP established the start-up company MARTI TB Diagnostics (Pty) Ltd to develop and eventually commercialise MARTI.
“This is designed to ensure that the technology remains in South African hands while attracting investment and serving global needs,” says Gerrie Mostert, interim CEO of the company. “The next steps are to get investors, funding and partner organisations on board, obtain regulatory approval and start manufacturing the kit. Ultimately, MARTI should be rolled out to clinics worldwide.”
One- and three-month regimens both had few adverse reactions and high rates of completion
Tuberculosis bacteria. Credit: CDC
A study comparing one- and three-month antibiotic treatments to prevent active tuberculosis (TB) finds that a high percentage of patients successfully completed both regimens and suffered few adverse side effects. A team led by Richard Chaisson, of the Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, reports these findings February 10th in the open access journal PLOS Medicine.
Following TB exposure, the World Health Organization has traditionally recommended six to nine months of antibiotic treatment to prevent an active infection from developing, but many individuals fail to complete the long course of medication. Studies have shown that shorter regimens lasting one and three months are effective at preventing TB, but the one-month treatment had only been tested in people living with HIV, and the safety of the two regimens had not been compared in a head-to-head trial.
Researchers performed a clinical trial in 500 people residing in Brazil, who were not living with HIV and had been exposed to TB. They randomly assigned participants to take two antibiotics, isoniazid and rifapentine, daily for one month, or weekly for three months. Both the one- and three-month regimens had similarly high rates of completion, at 89.6% and 84.1%, respectively. Adverse reactions were typically mild or moderate, and occurred at comparable rates in both groups. Both regimens were deemed successful and neither proved superior to the other.
Expanding the number of people who receive preventive therapy is essential for reducing TB infections globally, but these efforts have been hampered by several factors, including the length of the treatments. The new findings provide evidence that a one-month course of antibiotics is safe for patients, regardless of HIV status, and will help clinicians, public health programs, and patients to make informed choices about which regimens to use. Experts hope the success of shorter treatments, combined with the availability of newer generic formulations of the medications, which can be taken at home, will facilitate broader use of preventive therapy for TB.
The authors add, “Prevention of tuberculosis in people at the greatest risk is essential for global control of the disease, and shorter preventive treatment regimens will be instrumental in catalyzing uptake in high-burden countries.”
“Tuberculosis preventive treatment regimens have now been shortened from 6-9 months of daily medication to 1 month of daily treatment or 12 once-weekly doses, a transformational advance. Our study shows that both of the ultra-short regimens are well-tolerated and have high rates of completion.”
“The high rates of treatment completion and excellent safety profile of the short-course regimens will help Brazil and other high-burden countries achieve TB control by facilitating widespread uptake of TB preventive treatment,” states coauthor Betina Durovni.
“Preventing TB with short courses of well-tolerated medicines ensures that millions more people around the world can be protected from the devastating consequences of TB disease,” says coauthor Marcelo Cordeiro-Santos.
A new test shows promising results for detecting latent tuberculosis infection in resource-limited settings. This is according to a study from Karolinska Institutet, published in the journal Clinical Infectious Diseases.
“This test can help more people with latent tuberculosis to be detected and receive preventive treatment, especially in rural areas in countries with limited resources,” says last author Lina Davies Forsman, a researcher at the Department of Medicine, Solna, Karolinska Institutet.
Tuberculosis remains one of the world’s deadliest infectious diseases. To reduce the number of new cases, infected individuals with latent infection must be detected and offered preventive treatment to avoid active tuberculosis, which can spread the disease to others.
Currently, latent tuberculosis is often diagnosed using a laboratory test called QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus. This test involves several steps and can take one to two days before the results are available, as well as requiring advanced laboratory infrastructure and trained personnel. This makes it difficult to carry out tests in areas with a high prevalence of tuberculosis where access to laboratories and trained personnel is limited.
Results within 15 minutes
In the new study, researchers from Karolinska Institutet, together with colleagues in Vietnam, have therefore compared this test with another test, TB-Feron. This is a point-of-care test that provides results within 15 minutes and does not require an advanced laboratory or trained personnel.
The study included 345 adult participants in Hanoi, Vietnam, divided into three groups: people with confirmed tuberculosis, people in the same household as people with infectious tuberculosis, and people with no known exposure to tuberculosis. All were tested with both TB-Feron and the established laboratory test QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus.
The results show that TB-Feron has high sensitivity – 88 percent of individuals with expected positive results were correctly identified. The corresponding figure for QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus was 92 percent.
However, the specificity, i.e. TB-Feron’s ability to rule out tuberculosis infection in healthy individuals, was moderate at 70 percent. The corresponding figure for QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus was 96 percent.
Among household contacts, the concordance between TB-Feron and the established test was good, with 92 percent concordance for positive samples.
“It is promising that TB-Feron works so well in an environment with a high disease burden. The test is patient-friendly and easy to use, with rapid same-day results, making it useful in primary care,” says Han Thi Nguyen, pulmonologist and doctoral student at the same department and first author of the study.
The researchers also investigated the reliability of TB-Feron by comparing results from two different groups with laboratory staff. No systematic differences were observed, indicating good reproducibility.
With several important developments on the horizon, 2026 is set to be another eventful year in healthcare. Photo by Anna Shvets
19th January 2026 | By Marcus Low
From the limited rollout of a new HIV prevention jab to developments with new weight loss medicines, to high-stakes court cases relating to National Health Insurance (NHI), 2026 is set to be another tumultuous year in healthcare. Here are nine stories that Spotlight will keep a close eye on.
1. How will things go with the local rollout of a new HIV prevention jab?
Given the high rates of HIV in South Africa, the biggest HIV story this year is likely to be the rollout of a new HIV prevention jab at around 360 (roughly 10%) of South Africa’s public sector clinics. The jab, which contains the antiretroviral medicine lenacapavir, provides six months of protection against HIV infection at a time. It could be a gamechanger for people who, for whatever reason, struggle to take daily prevention pills. We will be tracking how and to whom the jab is made available and whether uptake meets expectations.
As we reported last year, work is also underway on a new lenacapavir formulation that could provide 12 months of protection per shot. We’ll be scouring journals and conference programmes for new data on this formulation.
2. Will we see better access to weight loss medicines?
The class of diabetes and weight loss drugs called GLP1-RAs have taken the world by storm in recent years. Until recently, drugs like semaglutide (brand names Ozempic or Wegovy) and tirzepatide (brand names Zepbound or Mounjaro) were only available as injections. The GLP1-RA market is, however, set to be upended by the introduction of some of these medicines in pill form. The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recently registered a semaglutide pill for use for weight loss. Another weight loss pill called orforglipron is also expected to be registered this year. One big question is when these pills will be registered and made available in South Africa and at what price.
Another important GLP1-RA development this year will be the expiration of a key patent on semaglutide in India. This will open the door to generic manufacturers bringing their own versions of semaglutide to market – something that usually leads to substantial price reductions. We will be keeping a close eye on how this situation plays out and analysing what the implications are for people in South Africa.
3. Might we see earlier than expected findings from pivotal TB vaccine trials?
The one TB vaccine we have is over a hundred years old and only provides limited protection for kids. Several experimental vaccines are, however, currently being evaluated in late-stage clinical trials. Arguably, the most notable of these is the M72 vaccine, which is being assessed in a massive phase 3 study, partly conducted in South Africa.
While timelines suggest most of the key TB vaccine studies will not yet have anything to report this year, it is possible that we might see a surprise or two. Findings are sometimes reported early if it becomes apparent ahead of schedule that a medicine or vaccine is clearly working, or clearly not working, as the case may be. Whether or not we see findings this year, it is important to start thinking about what a rollout might look like in our health system should results be as good as hoped. The M72 vaccine had around 50% efficacy in phase 2 trials, so there is reason for optimism.
4. Will we see a concrete plan to address public sector healthcare worker shortages?
Arguably, the most important dynamic in South Africa’s public healthcare system today is that provincial health departments are not employing enough healthcare workers across multiple categories. One reason for this is simply that budgets have generally shrunk over the last decade – obviously corruption and mismanagement in several provincial departments have made things even worse. There was a glimmer of hope in last year’s budget in which we saw a meaningful upturn in health funding for the first time in years, but that was at best a good first step toward recovery. As we enter 2026, our understanding is that all of the nine provinces are still facing severe healthcare worker shortages.
More money for health in the next budget will certainly help, but there is a broader sense that government doesn’t really have a big picture vision for how to address the crisis. We do have a 2030 Human Resources for Health Strategy, but as with many such strategies, it seems to have so far gone largely unimplemented.
5. Will enablers be held accountable for corruption such as that at Thembisa Hospital?
One of last year’s big media moments was a Special Investigating Unit (SIU) press conference in which they described the extensive corruption said to have taken place at Thembisa Hospital. One snag, however, is that while the SIU can recoup funds and take matters to the Special Tribunal, the SIU does not conduct criminal prosecutions – though they can refer matters to the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) for prosecution. Whether we will see successful NPA prosecutions relating to the Thembisa Hospital corruption is one of the year’s top questions.
Unfortunately, even when the SIU does sterling work and delivers cases to the NPA on a plate, there is no guarantee that the NPA will do its job. One depressing example is that of Buthelezi EMS. Last year, the Special Tribunal ordered Buthelezi EMS (and other companies with similar names) to pay over half-a-billion Rand back to the state. The SIU also referred a related matter to the NPA in 2024 for prosecution, but Spotlight understands that the NPA has rather mind-bogglingly decided to drop the matter.
6. Which, if any, senior health leaders will lose their jobs this year?
While we won’t have national or provincial elections this year, that is no guarantee that we won’t see any health leaders losing their jobs. Over the last two decades, there have after all been many examples of people being ousted between elections, be it for purely political reasons or due to corruption scandals.
Possibly the political leader in the health sector at greatest risk is KwaZulu-Natal MEC for Health, Nomagugu Simelane. Should the currently governing coalition of political parties in the province crumble, as it seems it might do, chances are several new MECs will be deployed, including for the health portfolio.
There is also an outside chance that the country’s top health official, Dr Sandile Buthelezi, Director-General for Health in the National Department of Health, might be forced to step down. As reported by AmaBhungane, Buthelezi played a central role in an “irregular” R836-million oxygen procurement process and is also “at the centre of aHawks investigation into allegations that he solicited a R500 000 bribe”. Our understanding is that Buthelezi has not been charged and that in the absence of charges he will stay in the job.
7. What will happen in the landmark NHI court cases?
Despite a new call for dialogue from Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana, chances for a political settlement over National Health Insurance (NHI) remains very low. The bottom line remains that Health Minister Dr Aaron Motsoaledi refuses to yield an inch on the version of NHI described in the Act and President Cyril Ramaphosa is not willing to force the matter.
Instead, it seems the battle over NHI will this year be fought mainly in the courts. At our count, there are at least eight cases challenging the NHI Act, parts of the Act, or the process resulting in the Act. A first development to look out for is whether or not some of the cases will be combined and heard together. In case you missed it, last year we published a two-part series in which we tried to pin down the issues on which these court cases are likely to turn (see part 1 and part 2).
While we will cover the NHI court cases in some depth, we will also try to foster constructive discussions on health reforms on our opinion pages and in our analysis. In our view, it is dangerously limiting to reduce the debate over South Africa’s healthcare reforms to a simple binary of whether one is for or against NHI.
8. What will be left of the FDA, NIH, and CDC by the end of 2026?
It used to be the case that United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) decisions and health advice from the United States Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) carried a lot of weight around the world. In recent months, however, there have been increasing signs of political interference at these institutions and a turn away from evidence-based policy making. It seems inevitable that we will see more of the same in 2026 and the credibility of both the CDC and probably also the FDA will be further diminished.
Similarly, the US National Institutes for Health (NIH) has been the world’s leading funder of health research for many years. But as with the CDC, the work of the NIH has been overly politicised over the last year and its reputation for rigour and scientific excellence has already been severely degraded. As with the FDA and CDC, the outlook is bleak.
9. How well will SA and other countries recover from last year’s US aid cuts?
With the dust settling after last year’s severe and abrupt cuts to US healthcare aid and US funding for medical research, the longer-term impacts of those cuts in South Africa and neighbouring countries should become clearer this year. Among others, we will get the first reliable estimates of key HIV and TB indicators for 2025 (reliable figures for a specific year are typically only published in the subsequent year). New HIV estimates from the Thembisa mathematical model (Spotlight’s preferred source for HIV estimates) should be out around the middle of the year, while new World Health Organization (WHO) TB estimates are usually released in November.
Last year Motsoaledi was widely criticised by activists for underplaying the seriousness of the cuts for South Africa’s HIV response and the scale of specialised services and capacity that was destroyed here. Eventually some extra funds were made available in response to the cuts, but it amounted to only a small fraction of what was lost. The harsh reality is that in some places the aftermath of the aid cuts will be felt for years to come.
At an international level, we are also not convinced that a clear roadmap has been set out for building back better after US withdrawal, though we’d be happy to be proven wrong. What is clear though is that entities like the WHO and UNAIDS are facing unprecedented financial and political pressures – it seems possible that UNAIDS will no longer exist a year from now. Much reform has already been undertaken at the WHO. By the end of the year, we should have some sense of whether things have stabilised and whether a coalition of willing nations is truly committed to keeping the WHO and multilateralism in health alive.
We have outlined only nine health issues in the above, but there are of course many more questions that we could have added to this list. Some of those include:
Whether we will see meaningful improvement in the South African government’s response to non-communicable diseases such as diabetes, cancers, and mental health conditions.
How well implementation of South Africa’s latest TB recovery plan is going, and in particular how we are doing against the target of testing five million people in 12 months.
How climate change will impact people’s health and whether the South African government is prepared for it.
Whether South Africa will see real progress in addressing antimicrobial resistance. After adopting a good policy a few years ago, it appears momentum has been lost.
Whether the state will start taking xenophobia in the healthcare system and around clinics and hospitals more seriously, as a recent court judgment requires it to do.
Whether we will see legislation introduced amending the Patents Act in line with a policy adopted by government in 2018 and whether we’ll see progress on the much-delayed State Liability Bill, which should have relevance for the state’s vulnerability to medico-legal claims.
Whether we will see concrete steps forward with the new electronic health records and data systems government is developing.
What progress we might see with the local production of vaccines and pharmaceuticals – one of the areas in which we are quite optimistic, despite the lack of coherent and enabling government policy.
What impact AI will, or will not, have in our healthcare system this year.
Are there issues not mentioned here that you think Spotlight should cover in 2026? Let us know by commenting below this article or by tagging us on BlueSky.
