Category: New Compounds and Treatments

Olaparib Excels in Breast Cancer Trial

A clinical trial of olaparib has been shown to help keep certain early-stage, hard-to-treat breast cancers at bay after initial treatment in promising early findings.

The results were so promising they were published early, ahead of the American Society of Clinical Oncology’s annual meeting and published in the New England Journal of Medicine

Olaparib, sold under the name Lynparza, was found to help breast cancer patients with harmful mutations have a longer disease-free survival after their cancers had been treated with standard surgery and chemotherapy.

It was studied in patients with BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutations, which can not only predispose people to breast cancer if they don’t work properly, but who did not have a gene flaw that can be targeted by the drug Herceptin.

Most patients in the study also had tumours not fuelled by oestrogen or progesterone. Triple negative breast cancers are not fuelled by these two hormones nor by the gene Herceptin targets.

The new study tested Lynparza in 1836 women and men with early-stage disease who were given the drug or placebo pills for one year after surgery and chemotherapy. About 82% of participants had triple-negative breast cancer.

Independent monitors advised releasing the results after observing clear benefit from Lynparza. After three years, 86% of patients on it were alive without cancer recurrence compared to 77% in the placebo group.

The results suggest more patients should get their tumours tested for BRCA mutations to help guide treatment decisions, said ASCO president Dr Lori Pierce, a cancer radiation specialist at the University of Michigan.

Serious side effects were rare, and other less serious side effects included anaemia, fatigue and blood cell count abnormalities.

Lynparza, which is marketed by AstraZeneca and Merck, is already sold in the United States and elsewhere for treating metastatic breast cancers and for treating certain cancers of the ovaries, prostate and pancreas. It costs roughly US$14 000 per month, though what patients pay out of pocket varies depending on income, insurance and other factors.

Source: Medical Xpress

New Antibody Treatment for Crimean-Congo Haemorrhagic Fever

Deer tick (Ixodes scapularis). Photo by Erik Karits on Unsplash

Working with international colleagues, US Army scientists have developed and tested an antibody-based therapy to treat Crimean-Congo haemorrhagic fever virus (CCHFV). 

The deadly virus is carried by ticks and has a high mortality rate, killing up to 60% of those infected. Their findings are published in the journal Cell.

The researchers characterised the human immune response to natural CCHFV infection by using blood samples donated by disease survivors. They were able to identify several potent neutralising antibodies that target the viral glycoprotein–a viral component which has a key role in disease development. A number of of these antibodies, administered individually or in combination, successfully protected mice from CCHFV when exposed to the virus after antibody administration.

In order to treat mice that had already been infected with the virus, the team created ‘bispecific’ antibodies that combined potency with the ability to bind to two different sites on the CCHFV glycoprotein. One of these bispecific antibodies, called DVD-121-801, overcame CCHFV infection in mice with just a single dose administered 24 hours after challenge with live virus.

DVD-121-801 as a potential therapeutic for human patients, according to co-first author Andrew H. Herbert, Ph.D., of the U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases (USAMRIID).

CCHFV is the most prevalent tick-borne virus that causes human disease, and is endemic in countries across Europe, Asia, and Africa. CCHF occurs most frequently among agricultural workers following the bite of an infected tick, and to a lesser extent among slaughterhouse workers exposed to the blood and tissues of infected livestock and medical personnel through contact with the body fluids of infected patients. In spite of its high lethality and widespread distribution, there are no vaccines or specific treatments for it. It has been designated a priority pathogen by the World Health Organization.

Study co-first author Andrew H Herbert, PhD, US Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, said: “Rodent models of CCHFV infection are useful in testing and down-selecting neutralising antibodies. However, to advance a lead candidate for therapeutic use, it will be necessary to conduct studies in larger animal models that more faithfully recapitulate human disease.”

Source: Medical Xpress

Journal information: J. Maximilian Fels et al, Protective neutralizing antibodies from human survivors of Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever, Cell (2021). DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.05.001

Averting Heart Failure by Shutting Down a Heart Protein

Photo from Olivier Collett on Unsplash
Photo from Olivier Collett on Unsplash

Shutting down a protein found in cardiac muscle could be a new mechanism to treat post-heart attack heart failure, according to research led by the University of Cambridge.

New drugs are needed to improve the heart’s pumping ability after damage from a heart attack. Drugs that strengthen the contraction of failing heart muscle have been deemed unsafe, leaving a gap in the heart attack and heart failure armamentarium.

Researchers now believe that they might have identified a new drug target—a protein called MARK4.

In research funded by the British Heart Foundation (BHF), Cambridge scientists found levels of MARK4 were elevated in mouse hearts after a heart attack. When they compared mice with and without MARK4 in the heart, they found hearts lacking the protein pumped blood 57% more efficiently. This protective effect was seen 24 hours after a heart attack and persisted over the entire follow-up period of four weeks.

The team was first in identifying that MARK4 fine-tunes a structural network within the heart muscle cell—called the microtubule network—that attaches to the machinery governing heart muscle cells contraction and relaxation. When MARK4 levels were increased after a heart attack, microtubules were tightly anchored onto the contractile machinery in the heart, increasing resistance and hindering normal function. When MARK4 levels were reduced, microtubules were loosely anchored, making contraction and relaxation easier.

Following a heart attack the speed of contraction in MARK4-lacking muscle cells increased by 42 percent and the speed of relaxation increased by 47 percent, compared to muscle cells from mice that had the MARK4 protein. They were also almost on par with healthy heart muscle performance, attesting to the power of reducing MARK4.

Based on these findings, the researchers suggested that drugs to switch off MARK4 could be a new way to improve recovery and help the heart to pump blood more efficiently in people with failing hearts.

Dr Xuan Li, BHF Intermediate Research Fellow at University of Cambridge BHF Centre of Research Excellence, said: “After years of research we’ve revealed an entirely new and promising way that could help the recovery of failing hearts.

“It’s early days, and we now need to test the longer-term effects of switching off MARK4. But if drugs to do that prove successful, the life-changing benefits could be seen in people with other types of heart disease as well as those who’ve had a heart attack and developed heart failure.”

Professor Metin Avkiran, Associate Medical Director at the British Heart Foundation, said: “Heart attacks are a major cause of disability worldwide—people who’ve had a major heart attack are at much greater risk of developing chronic heart failure. There are around 920 000 people living with heart failure in the UK, and we desperately need drugs to drastically improve the heart’s function in these patients.

“These findings are a positive step forward. Further research is needed to refine and test drugs that can target MARK4 before we’ll see them given to people who’ve had a heart attack and develop heart failure.”

Source: University of Cambridge

New Antimalarial Compound Traps Parasites in Cells

Photo by Егор Камелев on Unsplash

To combat the growing resistance of malaria to current treatments, researchers at the Francis Crick Institute and the Latvian Institute of Organic Synthesis have designed a new antimalarial compound which interrupts the malaria parasite life cycle by trapping them in their host cells.

While drugs and mosquito control have reduced levels of malaria over recent decades, with malaria being effectively wiped out in North America by the 1950s, the parasite still kills over 400 000 people every year, 90% of whom live in sub-Saharan Africa. It has now developed resistance to many existing antimalarial drugs, meaning new treatments that work in different ways are urgently needed.

If we can effectively trap malaria in the cell by blocking the parasite’s exit route, we could stop the disease in its tracks and halt its devastating cycle of invading cells.
Mike Blackman

The researchers developed an array of compounds designed to prevent the parasites bursting out of blood cells, a vital replication step. One compound in particular was found to be very effective in human cell tests.

“Malaria parasites invade red blood cells where they replicate many times, before bursting out into the bloodstream to repeat the process. It’s this cycle and build-up of infected red blood cells which causes the symptoms and sometimes fatal effects of the disease,” says Mike Blackman, lead author and group leader of the Malaria Biochemistry Laboratory at the Crick.  

“If we can effectively trap malaria in the cell by blocking the parasite’s exit route, we could stop the disease in its tracks and halt its devastating cycle of invading cells.”

Blocking the parasite’s emergence

The compound works by blocking an enzyme called SUB1, needed for them to burst out of cells. Current antimalarials kill the parasite within the cell, so the researchers hope this alternative drug action will overcome the resistance the parasite has acquired.

The compound can penetrate both the cell wall and the compartment within where the parasites reside.

The researchers are further refining the compound making it smaller and more potent. Further tests are needed before it can be trialled in humans.

Study author Chrislaine Withers-Martinez and researcher in the Malaria Biochemistry Laboratory, said: “Many existing antimalarial drugs are plant derived and while they’re incredibly effective, we don’t know the precise mechanisms behind how they work. Our decades of research have helped us identify and understand pathways crucial to the malaria life cycle allowing us to rationally design new drug compounds based on the structure and mechanism of critical enzymes like SUB1.

“This approach, which has already been highly successful at finding new treatments for diseases including HIV and Hepatitis C, could be key to sustained and effective malaria control for many years to come.” 

Source: Francis Crick Institute

Lenvatinib Produces Impressive Results Against Tough Tumours

Image by doodlartdotcom from Pixabay

Lenvatinib, a multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) induced a strong tumour response in patients with advanced gastrointestinal or pancreatic tumours, according to results from a phase II trial.

The study focused on previously treated advanced gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs). An overall response rate (ORR) of 29.9% was seen in the trial, with a particularly high ORR — 44.2% — in patients with pancreatic NETs. 

“This study provides novel evidence for the efficacy of lenvatinib in patients with disease progression following treatment with other targeted agents, suggesting the potential value in the treatment of advanced GEP-NETs,” wrote Jaume Capdevila, MD, PhD, of Vall Hebron University Hospital in Barcelona, and colleagues.

TKIs are a group of pharmacologic agents that disrupt the signal transduction pathways of protein kinases by several modes of inhibition. Since sunitinib maleate (Sutent), another multitargeted TKI, was approved ten years ago, investigators have been evaluating newer-generation TKIs that target VEGF receptors (VEGFRs), among other receptors, both in pancreatic and non-pancreatic NETs.

Lenvatinib targets VEGFR 1-3, fibroblast growth factor receptors (FGFR) 1-4, and platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha.

The researchers noted that studies have demonstrated its particular effectiveness against FGFR-1, which is a key driver of resistance to antiangiogenic drugs, “suggesting that it could potentially also reverse primary and acquired resistance to anti-VEGFR treatments or to other targeted agents.”

A total of 111 patients were enrolled in the study; 55 had histologically confirmed grade 1-2 pancreatic NETs, while 56 had gastrointestinal NETs. Patients were administered 24-mg lenvatinib once daily until disease progression or treatment intolerance. Median follow-up was 23 months.

The ORR was 16.4% for patients with gastrointestinal NETs, and median duration of response was 19.9 months for patients with pancreatic NETs and 33 months for gastrointestinal NETs. The median progression-free survival (PFS) for both groups was 15.7 months.

These results compare well with PFS outcomes reported in phase III trials, including those evaluating sunitinib and surufatinib, the authors noted.

“Interestingly, the ORR in pancreatic NETs was 44%, a rate not seen before with targeted agents,” Jonathan Strosberg, MD, head of the neuroendocrine tumor division at Moffitt Cancer Center in Tampa, told MedPage Today.

Dr Strosberg, who was not involved with this research, noted that the study group had been heavily treated beforehand, and that 29% had received prior sunitinib. “In contrast, the response rates with other TKIs have been <20% in this population, even in less heavily treated populations. The ORR for gastrointestinal NETs was more modest, but still impressive,” he added.

The most common grade 3/4 adverse events was hypertension (22.7%), while a majority of patients needed either a dose reduction or a pause.

“This suggests that lower starting doses might be considered in this population, and that particularly close monitoring of blood pressure is necessary,” said Dr Strosberg.

The study results “suggest that lenvatinib is more than just a ‘me-too’ competitor to sunitinib,” he noted. “It actually seems to have superior activity, potentially due to its ability to target both the VEGF and FGF receptors. Moreover, it appears to have activity in patients who have progressed on sunitinib. Randomized phase III studies with this drug are warranted, both for pancreatic and GI/lung NETs.”

Source: MedPage Today

Journal information: Capdevila J, et al “Lenvatinib in patients with advanced grade 1/2 pancreatic and gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors: results of the phase II TALENT trial (GETNE1509)” J Clin Oncol 2021; DOI: 10.1200/JCO.20.03368.

Experimental Inhibitor Drug Shows Promise For The Deadly Marburg Virus

Photo by CDC on Unsplash

The lethal Marburg virus, a relative of the Ebola virus, causes a serious haemorrhagic fever with an extremely high fatality rate and has had no known treatment — until now. 

Marburg virus infects human and primates, the disease currently has no approved vaccine or antivirals for prevention or treatment. In two larger recent outbreaks in the DRC in 1998–2000, and in Angola in 2004–2005, Marburg had extremely high fatality rates of 83% and 90%.

A team of researchers is working to change that. In a new paper in the journal Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, investigators from Penn’s School of Veterinary Medicine, working together with scientists from the Fox Chase Chemical Diversity Center and the Texas Biomedical Research Institute, report encouraging results from tests of an experimental antiviral targeting Marburg virus.

The new compound prevents viruses from leaving infected cells, thus halting the spread of infection. In a first, this new class of inhibitors was shown to be effective against infection in an animal model.

Additionally, possible similarities in virus-host interactions between Marburg and SARS-CoV-2, prompted the team to conducted experiments on the coronavirus. Unpublished preliminary results appeared encouraging.

“It really is exciting. These viruses are quite different but may be interacting with the same host proteins to control efficient egress and spread, so our inhibitors may be able to block them both,” said co-corresponding author Ronald Harty, Professor, Penn’s School of Veterinary Medicine.

Prof Harty’s team have been developing an antiviral that instead of targeting the virus known as “host-oriented.” By blocking the proteins in host cells that viruses hijack during late stages of infection, preventing virus-host interactions.

This method helps prevent a virus evolving resistance, but it also makes it more likely that a drug could be used against multiple viruses, as many make use of the same machinery in the host cell to reproduce and spread.

The Marburg and Ebola viruses use protein known as VP40 to interact with a host protein called Nedd4 to allow the completed viruses to ‘bud off’ of the host cell, which is a key part of viral replication.

Previously, they had tested a variety of small molecule inhibitors of this process using laboratory tests that relied on non-infectious and more-benign viral models. Those assays led them to a promising candidate, FC-10696, for further study.

The researchers firstly tested the chosen inhibitor for safety and its useful duration within the body. Next, since the real Marburg virus is too dangerous to study safely in anything but a Biosafety Level 4 (BSL-4) laboratory, they used an assay to look at what are known as virus-like particles, or VLPs, which are non-infectious but can bud off of a host cell.

Using the Biosafety Level 2 laboratory at Penn, “it’s a very quick way we can test these inhibitors,” said Prof Harty.

The researchers saw a dose-dependent response to FC-10696 on VLP budding in cells tested the compound using the real Marburg virus. These studies were done in a BSL-4 lab at Texas Biomedical Research Institute and found the compound inhibited the budding and spread of live Marburg virus in two human cell types, including in macrophages, an immune cell type commonly infected by the virus.

As a final step, they tested the compound in mice infected with Marburg virus. That received the treatment took longer to display disease symptoms and had a reduced viral load.

“These are the first promising in vivo data for our compounds,” said Prof Harty. “Whereas the control group all became sick very quickly and died, with the treated animals there was one survivor and others showed delayed onset of clinical symptoms. It’s showing that our inhibitors are having an effect.”

Source: News-Medical.Net

Journal information: Han, Z., et al. (2021) Compound FC-10696 Inhibits Egress of Marburg Virus. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. doi.org/10.1128/AAC.00086-21.

New Treatment may Regenerate Liver Scarring

Japanese researchers have come up with a new approach that could revolutionise the treatment and prevention of liver disease damage and possibly regenerate liver scarring.

This novel strategy involves small extracellular vesicles (sEVs), which are lipid-enclosed particles that are naturally released from a cell. The ones used in this study derived from interferon-γ (IFN-γ) pre-conditioned MSCs (γ-sEVs).

Cirrhosis (scarring of the liver) and other chronic liver diseases result in up to 2 million deaths reported annually around the world, these in turn account for approximately 3.5% of annual deaths globally. As the only treatment for clinically advanced cirrhosis liver transplantation, targeted therapies for modulating fibrosis and aiding tissue regeneration.  The ability to control fibrosis–the growth of fibrous tissue in response to damage– is often lost in livers under advanced cirrhosis.  The research builds upon this.

One of the most popular approaches is cell therapy, where mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) and macrophages have shown the potential to reduce liver fibrosis. MSCs are able to transform into a number of different cells. They are cost-effective, being available not only from bone marrow, but also from medical waste such as umbilical cord tissue, adipose (fatty) tissue, and dental pulp.

Apart from the ease of availability, MSCs can also be lab-grown. MSCs don’t replace tissue but instead have been shown to be medical signaling cells that indirectly produce cytokines, chemokines, growth factors, and exosomes that are crucial for repairing and regenerating damaged tissue.

Previous research showed that MSCs have anti-inflammatory, anti-fibrotic, and anti-oxidative effects through these humoural factors. MSCs also have lower potential for provoking an immune response and therefore rejection, enabling their use in both within the same individual and another.

In a series of experimental mice studies, researchers pre-conditioned fat extracellular vesicles with interferon gamma (IFN-γ), an important immune system signaller. They showed that this increases the number of anti-inflammatory macrophages, which are the key players in tissue repair, reducing fibrosis and promoting tissue regeneration.

They reported that both MSCs derived from fatty tissue (AD-MSC-sEVs) and AD-MSC-γ-sEVs can boost macrophage motility and phagocytic activity. In addition, they also show that AD-MSC-γ- sEVs can effectively control inflammation and fibrosis in mice with cirrhosis.

They found thatAD-MSC-derived sEVs can affect the shape and function of macrophages, effectively recruiting them into damaged areas to initiate tissue repair.

In an interview, researcher Dr Atsunori Tsuchiya at Niigata University, explained that, “Both mesenchymal stromal cells and macrophages are reported to have therapeutic effects for liver cirrhosis, however relationship of both cells and mechanisms of action was not clear. We challenged this problem.”

He continued, “We found the important fact that extracellular vesicles from interferon-γ can induce the tissue repair macrophages, which can regress fibrosis and promote liver regeneration effectively.” 

Dr Suguru Takeuchi, another of the researchers at Niigata University, concurred: “In our previous study, we reported that intravenous administration of mesenchymal stromal cells migrated to the lung, can work as ‘conducting cells’ and affect to macrophages ‘working cells’ in the liver.

“In this study we first elucidated that extracellular vesicles from mesenchymal stromal cells are key molecules to affect the macrophages.”

This study, which complements macrophage therapy, holds potential as a strategy for treating liver diseases using small extracellular vesicles pre-conditioned with IFN-γ. However, further development is needed, as well as uncovering the mechanisms by which they increase Treg cell count.

“Our results showed that modified extracellular vesicles can become a new therapeutic strategy for liver cirrhosis,” said Professor Shuji Terai, Niigata University.

Source: News-Medical.Net

Journal information: Takeuchi, S., et al. (2021) Small extracellular vesicles derived from interferon-γ pre-conditioned mesenchymal stromal cells effectively treat liver fibrosis. npj Regenerative Medicine. oi.org/10.1038/s41536-021-00132-4.

Antibodies May Hold The Key to Tooth Regeneration

It may be possible to regenerate missing teeth using monoclonal antibodies, according to a new study by scientists at Kyoto University and the University of Fukui. 

The team reported that an antibody for one gene—uterine sensitisation associated gene-1 or USAG-1—can stimulate tooth growth in mice suffering from tooth agenesis, a congenital condition. The paper was published in Science Advances. Monoclonal antibodies are often used to treat cancers, arthritis, and vaccine development.

Although the normal adult mouth has 32 teeth, about 1% of the population has more or fewer due to congenital conditions; adults with too many teeth are of interest because they could hold genetic clues to tooth regeneration.

Katsu Takahashi, one of the lead authors of the study and a senior lecturer at the Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, said that the fundamental molecules responsible for tooth development have already been identified.

“The morphogenesis of individual teeth depends on the interactions of several molecules including BMP, or bone morphogenetic protein, and Wnt signaling,” said Takahashi.

BMP and Wnt are also involved in the development of organs when humans are mere embryos. This means that drugs directly affecting their activity are usually avoided, as side effects could impact the entire body. The team considered the gene USAG-1, as they guessed that it could be safer to target the factors that antagonise BMP and Wnt specifically in tooth development .

“We knew that suppressing USAG-1 benefits tooth growth. What we did not know was whether it would be enough,” added Takahashi.

The scientists therefore investigated the effects of several monoclonal antibodies for USAG-1. Since USAG-1 interacts with both BMP and Wnt, many of the antibodies resulted in poor birth and survival rates of mice, showing that BMP and Wnt are important for whole body growth. However one antibody managed to disrupt the interaction of USAG-1 with BMP only.

Experimentation showed that BMP signalling is necessary for the number of teeth in mice, and a single administration was enough to generate an entire tooth. The same effects were seen in ferrets.

“Ferrets are diphyodont animals with similar dental patterns to humans. Our next plan is to test the antibodies on other animals such as pigs and dogs,” explains Takahashi.

This is the first study to show the benefits of monoclonal antibodies on tooth regeneration, and offers new alternatives to implants.

“Conventional tissue engineering is not suitable for tooth regeneration. Our study shows that cell-free molecular therapy is effective for a wide range of congenital tooth agenesis,” concluded Manabu Sugai of the University of Fukui, another author of the study.

Source: Medical Xpress

Journal information: A. Murashima-Suginami et al, Anti–USAG-1 therapy for tooth regeneration through enhanced BMP signaling, Science Advances (2021). DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abf1798

New JAK1 Inhibitor Abrocitinib Effective in Atopic Dermatitis

A phase III trial showed that a new oral Janus kinase 1 (JAK1) inhibitor, abrocitinib, bettered placebo, at higher doses, also outperformed dupilumab in treating signs and symptoms of atopic dermatitis.

More patients on the higher dose of abrocitinib had an Eczema Area and Severity Index 75 (EASI-75) response (75% improvement from baseline) as compared with the other three randomised groups, reported Hernan Valdez, MD, of Pfizer in New York City, and colleagues.

“In the JADE COMPARE trial, abrocitinib at a dose of either 200 mg or 100 mg once daily resulted in significantly greater reductions in signs and symptoms of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis than placebo on the basis of IGA and EASI-75 responses at weeks 12 and 16,” the authors stated. “The 100-mg dose of abrocitinib was not significantly different from dupilumab with respect to the three key secondary endpoints of the trial.”

“The 200-mg dose of abrocitinib was superior to dupilumab with respect to itch response at week 2 but not to an EASI-75 response at week 16; no conclusion could be drawn regarding the difference between the 200-mg dose of abrocitinib and dupilumab with respect to an IGA response… . Longer and larger trials are necessary to determine the efficacy and safety of abrocitinib and to compare it with other JAK inhibitors and with biologic agents used for the treatment of atopic dermatitis,” they added.

Several oral JAK inhibitors besides abrocitinib being clinically evaluatied for AD. According to the authors, targeting JAK1 results in inhibition of signaling by interleukin (IL)-4, IL-13, and other cytokines involved in AD. However, there is a lack of data on head-to-head trials of JAK inhibitors.

Despite the very positive reception of JAK inhibitors for the treatment of AD, there have been some studies which raised safety concerns. Tofacitinib, for example, has been associated with a higher rate of malignancies and major adverse cardiovascular events.

In this phase III trial, 838 patients with moderate or severe AD were randomised to abrocitinib 100 mg or 200 mg, dupilumab, or placebo. The trial had two primary endpoints: investigator’s global assessment (IGA) response at week 12 and EASI-75 response at week 12. Both endpoints were compared versus placebo. Secondary analyses included comparisons of itch response at week 2 versus placebo and dupilumab and IGA and EASI-75 responses versus placebo at week 16.

More patients on either of the two doses of abrocitinib had IGA responses at week 12 compared to placebo. The proportion of patients with an EASI-75 response at 12 weeks was 70.3% with abrocitinib 200mg, 58.7% for abrocitinib 100mg, 58.1% for dupilumab, and 27.1% for placebo. All treatment groups performed significantly better than placebo.

At week 2, 49.1% of patients had itch response with the higher dose of abrocitinib, 31.8% with the lower dose, 26.4% with dupilumab, and 13.8% with placebo. The 200-mg abrocitinib group was superior to dupilumab. 

Adverse events (AEs) occurred more often with 200-mg abrocitinib as compared with the other three groups (61.9% vs 50.0% to 53.4%), the most common of which was nausea.

Source: MedPage Today

Journal information:  Bieber T, et al “Abrocitinib versus placebo or dupilumab for atopic dermatitis” N Engl J Med 2021; DOI: 10.1056/NEJM0a2019380.

Zuranolone, a New Drug for MDD Shown to Be Safe and Effective in Trials

A recent trial showed that nightly 30mg doses of zuranolone, a new drug to treat major depressive disorder (MDD), are safe and only requires about two courses to achieve clinical improvement.

Zuranolone is one of a new class of neuroactive steroid drugs that positively modulates GABAA receptors. It has high bioavailability, can be taken orally and has a half-life suitable for daily administration. 

The SHORELINE Study is a Phase III, open-label, one year longitudinal study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and need for repeat dosing with zuranolone in adults with MDD. Two cohorts with either zuranolone 30mg or 50mg as a starting dose taken once nightly for 14 days. Need for repeated dosing is assessed every 14 days based on a patient-reported assessment, with a maximum of five courses over a year.

Analysis of the data showed that the study’s primary endpoint of safety and tolerability show that zuranolone was generally well-tolerated in both dosage cohorts, with adverse events being generally consistent with those seen in previous zuranolone trials.

Secondary endpoints included response and remission as evaluated by the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAMD-17) and the number of times a patient received retreatment. A mean of 2.2 treatments resulted in patients with a clinical response (baseline HAMD-17 reduction of ≥50%) to the initial course of zuranolone 30mg. Additional data from patients in the 50 mg dose cohort is expected to be reported in late 2021.

“Sage embarked on the LANDSCAPE clinical program to evaluate the safety and efficacy of zuranolone with the ambition of reimagining the treatment for depression with the goal of a rapid-acting, durable, treat-as-needed option in a disease where innovation is lacking and the incidence rate has unfortunately increased exponentially in the last 20 years,” said Barry Greene, Chief Executive Officer at Sage Therapeutics. “Today we are announcing additional positive data from the SHORELINE Study that demonstrate continued strong results from the 30 mg dose and strengthens our confidence in the potential of the 50 mg dose. Designed as a naturalistic study, these data approximate real-world evidence of use of zuranolone at 30 mg and 50 mg doses. We look forward to the results of the WATERFALL and CORAL Phase 3 pivotal data readouts in MDD this year.”

Source: Sage Therapeutics