Month: July 2026

University of Pretoria Research Explores How Africa’s Medicinal Plants Could Improve Healthcare

Profs Senkubuge, Nyakudya, Schlemmer and Joubert

The University of Pretoria (UP) is advancing research that could reshape how non-communicable diseases such as metabolic syndrome are prevented and managed in Africa. The Department of Physiology’s Professor Trevor Nyakudya has called for scientifically validated phytomedicine to become an integral part of future healthcare.

Phytomedicine is the scientific study of plant-derived compounds as therapeutic agents that support health and treat disease. According to the International Diabetes Federation, metabolic syndrome is a cluster of cooccurring metabolic abnormalities that, together, dramatically increase the risk of type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease and obesity, thus affecting the body’s ability to regulate and use energy effectively.

Delivering his inaugural professorial lecture, ‘Phytomedicine and Metabolic Health: Towards Integrative Solutions for a Global Crisis’, Prof Nyakudya presented more than a decade of pre-clinical medical research demonstrating how plant-derived bioactive phytochemicals and phytomedical plant extracts can complement existing conventional medicine in addressing metabolic syndrome, especially type 2 diabetes and related noncommunicable diseases.

His research comes at a time when the burden of metabolic disease is rising rapidly worldwide, particularly across Africa, where healthcare systems face significant resource constraints.“The plants of this continent, studied with the rigour of modern biomedical science, have something urgent and important to offer in the face of one of the defining health challenges of our time,” Prof Nyakudya said.

According to figures cited during his lecture, diabetes currently affects 589 million adults globally, with that number projected to increase to 853 million by 2050.Although conventional medicines remain essential, Prof Nyakudya argued that their effectiveness is often constrained in African settings by affordability, accessibility, long-term adherence and dependence on imported pharmaceuticals.“My argument is more specific: conventional pharmacotherapy, as currently deployed in African contexts, is structurally insufficient,” he said.

Over the course of his career, Prof Nyakudya has built one of South Africa’s leading research programmes in phytomedicine and metabolic health. His body of work spans 60 research-linked outputs and has established a coherent scientific framework linking indigenous medicinal plants with modern biomedical research. Working with collaborators and postgraduate students across South African universities and international research institutions, his laboratory has combined physiological techniques, molecular biology, histology and biochemistry to uncover how plant-derived compounds influence metabolic health at the molecular, cellular and organ levels.

Rather than validating traditional medicine through anecdotal evidence, his research applies rigorous scientific methods to establish the mechanisms by which phytochemicals regulate metabolism, inflammation and glucose control. This mechanistic approach positions phytomedicine firmly within evidence-based biomedical science and creates opportunities for translating indigenous knowledge into future therapeutic interventions.

A cornerstone of his research has focused on several naturally occurring bioactive phytochemicals found in numerous indigenous plant species. Through preclinical studies, his team demonstrated that administering some of these compounds during early critical periods of developmental plasticity could produce lasting protection against metabolic dysfunction later in life by reprogramming key metabolic pathways.

“The implication is profound: plant compounds administered in early life can reprogram metabolic vulnerability, shifting the therapeutic frame from lifelong adult pharmacotherapy to targeted prophylactic early-life intervention,” Prof Nyakudya said.

His research has identified critical molecular pathways through which phytochemicals influence glucose uptake, inflammation and energy metabolism, generating the mechanistic evidence required for future clinical translation. “Phytomedicine, done with mechanistic rigour, is not alternative medicine. It is integrative pharmacology. It engages the same molecular pathways as metformin. It applies the same scientific standards as conventional drug development. The difference is the source – and that difference is an advantage, not a limitation.”

Beyond metabolic disease, Prof Nyakudya is expanding his research into cancer biology and bone metabolism, investigating how plant-derived compounds may simultaneously address multiple chronic diseases through shared biological pathways.

Dis-Chem Opens First On-site Staff Clinic as Employers Rethink Workplace Healthcare

New facility at head office and distribution centre brings primary healthcare directly to employees, marking a shift from wellness awareness to healthcare access

Dis-Chem has opened its first dedicated employee clinic, located at its head office and distribution centre in Midrand, giving employees direct access to primary healthcare services without leaving the workplace. The clinic was launched during Corporate Wellness Week and forms part of a planned rollout to additional distribution centres across the country.

Modelled on the Health Hub ‘store of the future’ recently launched at Melrose Arch which makes healthcare delivery the core offering, the facility offers a full suite of clinical services including routine consultations, maternal healthcare, immunisations and vaccinations, with escalation to a doctor where needed.

The launch reflects a broader shift in how South African employers approach workplace wellness. According to Nomfundo Vilakazi, Dis-Chem’s Director of People and Culture, corporate wellness has traditionally centred on annual screenings, wellness days and fitness initiatives, programmes that raise awareness but do little to remove the practical barriers that prevent people from seeking care.

“For many working South Africans, routine check-ups are postponed and early warning signs ignored, not because health isn’t valued, but because accessing care isn’t always convenient. The experience we create for our people directly influences the experience our people create for our customers,” says Vilakazi.

 “If we want customers to experience care, expertise and seamless service, our employees, as our priority customers, must experience those same principles inside our organisation. If we expect our people to champion health, we must first make it possible for them to prioritise their own.”

The clinic launch coincides with another milestone for the company: the formal definition of its Employer Value Proposition (EVP), which reinforces our Holistic Healthcare pillar that distinguishes Dis-Chem as an employer of choice. The employee clinic, servicing over 2500 head office and distribution centre employees, is positioned as a tangible, living expression of that strategic EVP commitment rather than a standalone corporate benefit.

Lizeth Kruger, Clinic Executive at Dis-Chem, notes that research consistently shows that when employees can consult a healthcare professional without taking time off work or travelling long distances, they are more likely to seek preventative care, manage chronic conditions and address concerns before they become serious – benefits that extend to families and communities well beyond the workplace.

“This is not about treating illness,” adds Kruger. “Creating an environment where our people, customers and communities can thrive begins by caring for those who make that mission possible every day. When we invest in the health of our people, everyone benefits.”

The model also incorporates innovative virtual healthcare solutions. Where appropriate, and when the clinic nurse has managed the patient within the full scope of her practice, patients can be seamlessly connected to a doctor via a video medical consultation. This approach enhances access to comprehensive, holistic care by combining the on-site expertise of the nurse with the support and guidance of a medical practitioner, ensuring patients receive the right care at the right time.

Employees not based at the head office or distribution centre will continue to access care through Dis-Chem’s existing clinic network, ensuring healthcare remains within reach across the business. The company plans to extend the employee clinic model to additional distribution centres within the next year.

Upending Decades of Debate, Scientists Discover Most Neurons are Jacks-of-All-Trades

Findings that neurons in mice are mostly generalists, instead of specialised for specific functions, has scientific community abuzz

A healthy neuron. Credit: NIH

What scientific findings proved so compelling that more than 11 000 preliminary copies of them have been downloaded before they finally appeared in the latest issue of Nature?

The new research focuses on a mystery as old as neuroscience. Is each neuron in the brain a specialist devoted to a limited task, like a hammer or a saw, or do they tend to be generalists, jacks-of-all-trades like Swiss Army Knives?

By combing through a trove of recordings from an international collaboration that analysed the brains of mice, researchers at Columbia’s Zuckerman Institute reveal that specialist neurons certainly do exist, but the majority appear to be generalists.

“We have to move away from this image of the brain as a machine made of gears, with every gear having an exact purpose that we can attach a label to,” said Stefano Fusi, PhD, a principal investigator at Columbia’s Zuckerman Institute, a member of the Kavli Institute for Brain Science and the paper’s co-senior author. “The brain doesn’t work like that. Instead, most neurons can display a huge diversity of responses, and this can help the brain solve a huge number of different tasks.”

These new findings shed light on how the brain may ultimately prove capable of performing complex tasks. In doing so, they may help reveal what happens when something goes wrong in the brain, and how those processes might be steered to go right again.

Whether neurons are specialists or generalists “is an old, important question, and one which researchers have really strong opinions on,” said Lorenzo Posani, PhD, the study’s co-lead author and a principal investigator at the Paris Brain Institute and France’s CNRS, who conducted this work while at Columbia’s Zuckerman Institute. Previous research found the brain is organised into modules devoted to vision and smell and other processes; so perhaps such specialisation might extend all the way down to the level of neurons. On the other hand, the brain is an incredibly powerful general-purpose computer that can respond in an extraordinary number of ways to a huge variety of situations, so maybe its neurons are similarly generalist in nature.

The problem with answering this question was that scientists often each tackled it with different approaches – for instance, they looked at different types of animals or brain regions or had the animals perform different tasks, Dr Posani said. This often led to conflicting results – in some studies, some neurons were clearly specialised, while others appeared not to be.

To help resolve the debate, in the new study, the researchers developed a strategy where they looked only at mice, across many brain areas at once as the rodents all performed the same type of activity. This involved analysing datasets much larger than typically studied, recordings of lots of neurons from the International Brain Laboratory consortium of activity in 43 regions across the mouse cortex on the level of single neurons. 

In primary sensory areas, such as the brain region devoted to vision, neurons behaved in specialised ways. However, elsewhere, neurons generated far more diverse responses. In other words, when it comes to the question of whether neurons are typically specialists or generalists, these new findings suggest the latter holds true.

“We’re not saying that there are no specialised neurons,” said Dr Fusi, also a professor of neuroscience at Columbia’s Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons and a member of Columbia’s Center for Theoretical Neuroscience. “We’re saying they are the exceptions. They’re not the rule.”

The scientists did find that based on a neuron’s pattern of responses to a given task, they could pinpoint with surprising accuracy which specific module in the brain it belonged to. However, these neurons still generally display generalist behaviour. 

“For example, compare this to maps of voter opinions,” Dr Posani said. “There are clear clusters where people generally vote the same way. But when you zoom in, you see mixes of opinions.”

In addition, not only are most neurons generalists, but they rarely duplicate the behavior of one another. “Each is versatile in its own way,” says study co-lead author Shuqi Wang, a doctoral student at École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne in Switzerland. This helps enable the brain’s flexibility and computational power, she explained.

All in all, the researchers suggest the multi-purpose nature of most neurons lets each of them encode information about multiple variables, such as whether a shape is red or black, or a circle or square. In turn, neurons collectively encode “high-dimensional” representations, which combine several different variables at the same time, such as, say, a red circle or black square. Such high-dimensional representations let populations of neurons behave flexibly in terms of what input they receive and output they generate. “You can reuse these high-dimensional representations for lots of different tasks,” Dr Fusi said.

A key implication of these findings is that while each neuron generally encodes multiple variables, it is difficult to decode what any of these variables are from an individual neuron. It is only upon examining populations of neurons, like the brain does, that variables can be decoded. This is a major shift in thinking for the neuroscience community, “which for decades focused on one neuron at a time, discarding all neurons whose responses could not be understood,” Dr Fusi said.

The scientists are now working with Ueli Rutishauser‘s group at Caltech ​​to investigate whether similar results are seen in humans, Dr. Fusi said. They also would like to see if neurons behaved more as generalists or specialists depending on what tasks a brain is asked to perform, he added. “There is still a lot to discover,” he said.

Source: Columbia Zuckerman Institute

Epidurals Not Linked to Increased Harm for Newborns or Children

Study provides strong evidence that epidural analgesia in labour is safe for newborns, say researchers

Photo by Duda Oliveira

Having an epidural during labour is not associated with clinically significant increased risks of harm to newborn babies, including brain injury, severe breathing problems, sepsis and death, or cerebral palsy later in childhood.

The researchers say these findings “support widening availability and equitable access to epidural analgesia as a safe component of intrapartum care.”

Epidural analgesia in labour provides effective pain relief and may help reduce complications in mothers after giving birth, but evidence of its effect on newborn and child health is limited.

To address this, researchers analysed data for 495 695 births in Scotland over a 13 year period (2007-2019) to examine whether epidural analgesia during labour was associated with serious neurological conditions occurring within 28 days of birth.

Only women who delivered a single baby vaginally or via unplanned caesarean section between 24 and 42 weeks of pregnancy were included in the analysis.

Further measures included other severe newborn illness, sepsis, low Apgar score (a routine test of a baby’s health) five minutes after birth, death within 28 days of birth, and cerebral palsy diagnosed at any point during childhood.

Factors such as mother’s age, ethnicity, weight, existing pre-eclampsia or diabetes, smoking history, birth location and gestational age at birth, were also taken into account.

Of nearly 500 000 women included in the study, around one in four had an epidural during labour. Overall, serious neurological conditions were rare, affecting fewer than 1 in 1000 babies. These conditions occurred at the expected rate and were no more common among babies whose mothers had an epidural compared with those who did not.

No association was found between epidural analgesia in labour and serious neurological conditions, other severe newborn illness, sepsis, low Apgar score at five minutes, death at 28 days, or cerebral palsy in childhood.

This is an observational study so no firm conclusions can be drawn about cause and effect, and the authors acknowledge that the study was limited to women delivering in Scotland, a predominantly white population, so the findings may not apply to more ethnically diverse populations or other healthcare settings.

However, this was a large study with long term follow-up of newborn and childhood outcomes, and results were consistent after additional analyses across various groups including women considered to have high risk pregnancies and preterm births, supporting the reliability of the findings.

As such, the authors conclude: “These results should reassure parents and clinicians that epidural analgesia use in labour is safe for babies and support informed, evidence based decision making about analgesic options in labour.”

Source: The BMJ Group

Dialling Back Stiffness May Protect Muscles in Myotonic Dystrophy

Photo by Sasun Bughdaryan on Unsplash

For decades, researchers studying myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) have focused on the disease’s underlying genetic cause: a mutation that produces a toxic form of RNA, disrupting the normal processing of thousands of genetic messages inside cells. While scientists have known this widespread disruption contributes to disease, it has remained unclear which changes are most responsible for the progressive muscle weakness and wasting experienced by people living with DM1.

Now, a new study published in Nature Communications suggests that one hallmark symptom of the disease – muscle stiffness, known as myotonia—may play a much larger role in driving muscle damage than previously recognised.

“Our findings suggest that myotonia isn’t simply an uncomfortable symptom people experience,” said John Lueck, PhD, associate professor of Pharmacology and Physiology at University of Rochester Medicine and senior author of the study. “It appears to amplify the harmful effects of the disease in muscles. When we eliminated myotonia in our mouse model, we didn’t just improve muscle relaxation; we saw healthier muscles overall.”

The findings suggest that therapies aimed at reducing myotonia could help preserve muscle function while complementing emerging treatments designed to address the disease’s underlying genetic cause.

A disease caused by toxic RNA

DM1 is the most common form of adult muscular dystrophy. The inherited disorder causes progressive muscle weakness, muscle wasting, slow relaxation after muscle contraction, heart rhythm abnormalities, cataracts, excessive daytime sleepiness, and a range of other symptoms.

The disease begins with an abnormal expansion of repeated DNA segments in the DMPK gene. Rather than producing a faulty protein, this mutation creates a toxic RNA molecule that traps proteins needed to correctly process genetic instructions. As a result, hundreds to thousands of genes are improperly “spliced,” producing abnormal protein versions throughout the body. Decades of research led by URochester Medicine neurologist Charles Thornton, MD, a co-author of the study, helped establish how this toxic RNA disrupts normal RNA splicing and drives the disease.

One of the most important affected genes expresses a chloride channel that helps muscles relax after they contract. When that channel is disrupted, muscles become electrically overactive, producing the delayed relaxation known as myotonia.

Looking beyond the root cause

Most research has focused on eliminating the toxic RNA itself, with several RNA-targeted therapies now advancing toward clinical use. However, Lueck and his colleagues wanted to answer a different question: once myotonia develops, does it simply reflect the disease, or does it actively worsen muscle damage?

Previous work from the URochester Medicine team had hinted at the answer. They found that when myotonia occurred alongside another splicing defect affecting calcium channels, muscle disease became dramatically worse in mice. Treating those mice with calcium channel-blocking drugs reversed many of the effects. That finding suggested that muscle hyperexcitability might be directly contributing to muscle degeneration.

“We’ve spent years trying to understand which of the many splicing changes actually matter most,” Lueck said. “This study allowed us to isolate one of those changes and ask what happens when you permanently remove myotonia while leaving the underlying disease process in place.”

Turning down the disease’s “volume”

To answer that question, the researchers genetically corrected a single critical portion of the chloride channel gene in a mouse model of DM1. The researchers expected to reduce muscle stiffness. Instead, they saw improvements throughout the muscle.

The mice no longer developed muscle stiffness, but they also generated greater muscle force, showed healthier muscle tissue under the microscope, and experienced broad improvements in abnormal gene expression and RNA splicing. The findings suggest myotonia may act as what Lueck describes as a “volume knob” on the disease.

“The toxic RNA is still present,” he said. “But myotonia appears to turn up the damage happening in muscles. When we turned myotonia down, many aspects of muscle health improved, even though we hadn’t corrected the original genetic mutation.”

Implications for future treatments

The findings could influence how researchers think about treating DM1. Several experimental therapies currently in development are designed to eliminate the toxic RNA that causes the disease. Researchers have long used improvements in myotonia as an early sign that these therapies are working because the chloride channel is particularly sensitive to correction.

The new study suggests that reducing myotonia may itself contribute significantly to improved muscle health. In other words, treating myotonia may do more than relieve stiffness – it may actually help slow or reduce the muscle damage caused by the disease.

At the same time, existing medications that reduce myotonia – including drugs such as mexiletine and ranolazine – may deserve renewed attention. Although these medications can improve muscle stiffness, side effects often limit their long-term use, and many people with DM1 never receive them.

“If we can develop safer, better-tolerated myotonia drugs, they could become an important complement to RNA-based therapies—or provide meaningful benefit for patients who don’t have access to those advanced treatments,” said Lueck.

Source: University of Rochester Medicine

Melatonin May Help Ease Chronic Muscle and Joint Pain, New Study Suggests

Made with AI

Dipa Kamdar, Kingston University

Melatonin is best known for helping us sleep. But a new study suggests it might have another surprising use: easing muscle and joint pain.

Produced naturally by the pineal gland in the brain at night, melatonin helps regulate the body’s sleep-wake cycle. That’s why this hormone is widely used as a treatment for insomnia and jet lag.

Sleep and pain are closely linked (poor sleep can make pain feel worse, and pain can make sleep harder). But melatonin may also reduce pain directly. Researchers believe it dampens pain signals in the brain and spinal cord, reduces inflammation, calms overactive nerves and protects cells from oxidative stress – the cellular wear and tear caused when harmful molecules build up.

In the new study, researchers combined the results of 23 clinical trials involving over 2,000 participants to identify overall patterns. These trials looked at melatonin for long-term muscle and joint pain as well as pain after surgery.

Overall, melatonin reduced both pain and sleep problems in people with chronic muscle and joint pain. But the improvements were modest. On average, pain scores fell by about nine points on a 100-point scale. That’s within the range reported for some anti-inflammatory drugs in similar studies, although the two treatments haven’t been directly compared.

Melatonin’s effects may also depend on whether people already have sleep problems or other long-term health conditions. Most of the chronic pain studies included people who already had poor sleep to begin with, but none of the trials looked at results separately for people with and without sleep issues. Because of this, it’s unclear whether melatonin works better for people who struggle with sleep or whether the effects are similar for everyone.

The findings were much less convincing for pain after surgery. Melatonin did not make a noticeable difference to pain or sleep. One analysis found a tiny improvement (about 2.5 points on a 100-point pain scale), but this is far below what would matter to patients recovering from surgery.

The benefits in chronic muscle and joint pain are modest. Based on the current evidence, melatonin should be seen as a possible add-on treatment rather than a replacement for established therapies. The evidence suggests melatonin could complement treatments such as physiotherapy, exercise and anti-inflammatory medicines rather than replace them.

What we still don’t know

There is also still a lot we don’t know. The trials in this study used a wide range of doses, from 1mg to 10mg, and the researchers couldn’t determine which dose worked best.

There were hints that longer treatment helped more in chronic pain, but this was based on only a few studies. There is also very little evidence on the effectiveness of higher doses, even though they appear safe in other studies.

Melatonin is widely used and generally considered safe for short-term use, but it can cause side-effects, such as daytime sleepiness, dizziness, headaches and nausea.

People with liver or kidney conditions, or those with autoimmune conditions like rheumatoid arthritis, should speak with a doctor or pharmacist before taking it.

It is also worth noting that melatonin is regulated very differently around the world. In the US, melatonin is sold as a dietary supplement, meaning people can buy it easily in supermarkets and online without medical advice. But in the UK, melatonin is a prescription-only medicine and is only licensed for short-term sleep problems and jet lag.

For now, the findings suggest melatonin may offer modest relief for some people with chronic muscle and joint pain, particularly if poor sleep is part of the problem. It’s unlikely to replace established treatments, but it could eventually earn a place alongside them. Larger, well-designed trials will be needed before doctors can say with confidence who is most likely to benefit.

Dipa Kamdar, Senior Lecturer in Pharmacy Practice, Kingston University

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Opinion Piece: Why Gap Cover Has Become a Non-negotiable Conversation for Advisers

Photo by Alex Green on Unsplash

By James White, Director: Sales and Marketing at Turnberry Management Risk Solutions

Medical aid is essential for accessing private healthcare in South Africa, but it does not always cover the full cost of treatment. Shortfalls related to specialist fees, co-payments, and sub-limits, are an ongoing reality, leaving many medical aid members exposed to significant out-of-pocket expenses. This is why gap cover is no longer an optional conversation for advisers. As these shortfalls become increasingly common, clients rely on advisers to identify where cover may fall short and to explain how these risks can be managed. Gap cover plays an important role in addressing this challenge by covering the difference between what medical schemes pay and what providers charge, making it an integral part of the advice process.

Making gap cover part of the conversation

As medical expense shortfalls become increasingly common, addressing them is becoming part of a financial adviser’s responsibility. When recommending or reviewing medical aid, it is not enough to focus only on contributions and benefits. Advisers also need to ensure that their clients are fully aware that their medical aid may not cover the full cost of treatment, particularly where specialist fees, co-payments and sub-limits apply.

Areas where clients are likely to face out-of-pocket costs need to be explained clearly, together with how gap cover can reduce them. Advisers need to position gap cover not as an optional extra, but as an essential part of ensuring that clients are not left exposed to avoidable out-of-pocket costs.

The cost of not addressing shortfalls

If financial advisers do not discuss gap cover with clients, the impact is typically not felt immediately. However, the problem becomes clear when a claim arises. If a member receives  treatment expecting their medical aid to cover the full cost, and then ends up with a large bill for the shortfall, or has to pay a large co-payment upfront, this can result in significant dissatisfaction.

The reality is that medical expense shortfalls are no longer unusual, and both the size and frequency of these costs are increasing. Specialists may charge several times the scheme rate, while co-payments and benefit limits are increasingly used by medical aids to manage costs and keep premiums affordable. Without additional cover, patients must pay these costs out of pocket, and they can run into tens or even hundreds of thousands of rands.

This is why it is important that these gaps be raised upfront. Clients rely on their advisers to explain how medical aid works and what costs may arise, so they can make informed decisions before a claim happens, rather than being caught off guard by costs that place pressure on their finances.

What advisers should be explaining

Gap cover should form part of every discussion around medical aid, rather than being treated as an optional extra. When recommending or reviewing medical aid, it is important for advisers to highlight where out-of-pocket costs may still arise, including specialist tariff gaps, co-payments, sub-limits and network restrictions.

These risks need to be explained clearly, together with how gap cover can reduce them. Discussing this upfront helps clients understand what their medical aid will and will not pay, so they are not surprised by costs when they claim. It also ensures that decisions around cover are based on a clear view of the full healthcare funding picture, not only the monthly premium.

Over time, this approach builds trust and reinforces the adviser’s role in helping clients manage healthcare costs, rather than reacting to them after the fact.

Complete advice requires a complete view of healthcare risk

Medical aid remains essential, but it does not remove the risk of medical expense shortfalls, co-payments, or sub-limits. These are now a routine part of private healthcare and need to be addressed as part of the advice process.

Advisers have a responsibility to identify and explain these risks clearly, and to make them a consistent part of every client conversation.

Helping clients understand how their medical aid works, where shortfalls may arise, and how gap cover can address those gaps ensures that their cover reflects a complete view of their healthcare costs and is genuinely aligned to their needs.

How Did the COVID-19 Pandemic Shift Seasonal Surges of Other Respiratory Diseases?

Study links shifts to buildup of susceptible hosts, explores similar shifts in heart-related deaths

Creative layout featuring scientifically-based 3D renderings of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV). RSV is a common contagious virus that infects the human respiratory tract. Credit: NIAID

 A German analysis explores what underlies shifts in the timing of seasonal surges of respiratory diseases, as well as shifts in surges of heart-related deaths, that occurred after the COVID-19 pandemic began. Michael Sieber and Arne Traulsen of the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology, Germany, present these findings in the open-access journal PLOS Global Public Health on July 15, 2026.

Rates of respiratory infections such as the flu and RSV typically peak during seasons when transmission rates rise. Rates of death from any cause – not just from infection – follow a similar seasonal pattern.

However, the drivers underlying the exact timing of these surges have been unclear. The COVID-19 pandemic provided a unique opportunity to explore these dynamics, since interventions like social distancing and masking disrupted typical transmission patterns of other respiratory diseases. Sieber and Traulsen analysed data on weekly respiratory infection rates and death rates in Germany, covering the last 14 years. 

The analysis showed that, pre-pandemic, respiratory infections almost always surged for a few weeks February and March. After the pandemic began, intervention efforts tamped down infections, eliminating one seasonal surge. Once infections rose again, surges shifted to December or earlier. Now, these peak weeks are gradually resuming pre-pandemic timing.

Using well-established epidemiological modelling tools, the researchers found that population-level loss of immunity after the skipped seasonal surge led to buildup of susceptible hosts, resulting in higher transmission earlier in the season. That is, seasonal transmission variations present a window of opportunity for a surge, and the size of the pool of susceptible hosts at the start of that window determines when, exactly, the surge occurs.

Similarly, typical seasonal surges in rates of death from any cause – but particularly from cardiovascular disease – also shifted earlier post-pandemic. Thus, respiratory infections may be key drivers of the timing of seasonal surges in cardiovascular deaths. More research is needed to explore this connection, but it aligns with other evidence that respiratory infections are a significant risk factor for cardiovascular disease.

On the basis of their findings, the researchers emphasize the importance of monitoring people’s infection history and improving vaccination coverage.

The authors add: “News stories of an earlier than usual onset of the flu season during the COVID-19 pandemic motivated us to look into the available epidemiological data more closely. We were surprised by the magnitude of the shift in timing of seasonal respiratory infections in Germany, and interested in trying to predict if this would turn out to be a long-term effect of the pandemic or if we should expect a quick return to the normal seasonal timing. The most recent flu seasons confirmed that the seasonal timing indeed shifts back to normal within one or two seasons, most likely due to a return to the pre-pandemic population-levels of immunity to the most common respiratory pathogens. We were even more surprised to see that the seasonal dynamics of all-cause mortality, which is dominated by cardiovascular diseases, closely followed the shift in timing of respiratory infections. This adds to the growing evidence that respiratory infections are an important risk factor for cardiovascular problems.”

Provided by PLOS
 

Researchers Use Friendly Viruses to Tackle Inflammatory Bowel Disease

A targeted approach using bacteriophages to disarm harmful microbes without disrupting the broader gut ecosystem

Credit: CC0

A research team at McMaster University has developed a targeted approach to treating inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) using bacteriophages, viruses that infect specific bacteria, to disarm harmful microbes without disrupting the broader gut ecosystem.

The study, published in Science Translational Medicine and featured on the cover of the journal, brings together researchers from the Faculty of Engineering and the Faculty of Health Sciences, combining expertise in microbiome science and targeted antimicrobials to tackle a complex challenge in gut health.

Although current treatments for IBD can be effective, they can fail long-term or require escalating doses, increasing the risk of serious side effects.

IBD is shaped by a combination of genetics, immune responses and the gut microbiome. The research team focused on a group of bacteria known as adherent-invasive Escherichia coli (AIEC), which have been linked to inflammation in some people with Crohn’s disease. These bacteria can be difficult to identify and selectively target, making them an important test case for more precise microbiome-based therapies.

“One challenge is that AIEC are defined by what they do, not simply by how they appear in a microbiome analysis,” says Elena Verdu, professor in the Department of Medicine, director of the Farncombe Family Digestive Health Research Institute, and an executive member of NexusHealth.

“To identify them, we need to test their behaviour, such as their ability to adhere to and invade intestinal cells and persist in immune cells.”

Working with E. coli strains isolated from patients with Crohn’s disease, the team used controlled experimental models to isolate how AIEC contribute to inflammation and explore ways to neutralise their harmful behaviour without damaging beneficial bacteria.

To target AIEC without collateral damage, the team turned to bacteriophages, or phages, which are naturally occurring viruses that infect bacteria with remarkable precision.

“Phages work like a lock-and-key system – each phage targets only certain bacteria. That precision gives us a way to intervene without wiping out the entire microbiome,” explains Zeinab Hosseinidoust, associate professor in the Department of Chemical Engineering and the School of Biomedical Engineering and a member of the Michael G. DeGroote Institute for Infectious Disease Research (IIDR).

The team identified and characterised phages that selectively target AIEC strains isolated from patients with IBD and found that this approach significantly reduced gut inflammation.

The phages did not eliminate the bacteria entirely. Instead, they altered their behaviour by supressing a molecular “grappling hook” that helps AIEC attach to the gut lining and trigger immune responses. When that virulence mechanism was turned off, inflammation subsided.

“The bacteria were still there, but they lost the traits that drive inflammation,” says Hosseinidoust.

“We like to think of it as knocking out a few teeth. The bacteria can’t do as much damage anymore.”

The researchers also found that phage therapy enhanced the effectiveness of a commonly used steroid treatment for IBD. When combined with the phage, a lower-than-standard dose produced benefits comparable to higher doses of the drug alone.

While phages have previously been shown to increase the effectiveness of antibiotics, this is the first time a positive collaboration between phage and a non-antibiotic drug has been reported.

The findings point to a precision-medicine approach for IBD. The bacterial function targeted by the phage can be measured in stool samples and was found to be higher in a subset of patients with Crohn’s disease, suggesting a potential way to identify those who could benefit most from this therapy.

“If we can identify which patients carry the harmful bacterial function, we could, in the future, intervene with a targeted therapy designed specifically to turn down that activity,” says Verdu.

“This is what personalised medicine should look like: matching the right biological tool to the right patient,” says Hosseinidoust.

Next steps for the team include evaluating broader collections of bacterial strains from IBD patients and developing combinations of phages – work that brings the approach closer to human trials.

By Andrea Lawson

Source: McMaster University

New Clues Raise Hopes for Better Treatment of RSV in Babies

Created with AI

Future therapies for respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) must target both the virus and its immune response to ensure babies get the best possible outcomes, finds a new study by researchers at UCL and Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children (GOSH).

RSV is the biggest cause of serious illness in babies, with over three million hospital admissions worldwide because of the virus every year. It causes wheezing and breathing difficulties, and in the worst cases babies end up in intensive care. Despite this, treatment options for infants who develop severe disease remain extremely limited.

As part of the new study, published in Nature Communications and funded by Animal Free Research UK and UK Research and Innovation (UKRI), researchers built a new lab model of baby lungs to show why RSV makes infants so much sicker than adults and allow them to test new treatments before they reach patients.

The miniature model of a baby’s airways was created using real infant airway cells, blood vessel cells and neutrophils (a type of white blood cell that acts as the immune system’s primary response to infection).

To compare with an adult response to RSV, the research team also made a model of an adult’s airways.

Dr Claire Smith (UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health), who led the study, said: “This model allows us to watch early immune responses unfold and study them in a human setting that reflects the infant airway. That’s something animal models often struggle to capture, especially when it comes to age-specific effects.”

When the models were infected with RSV, the team found that baby airway cells attracted far more white blood cells than adult airway cells did. This influx can block babies’ small airways and make it harder for them to breathe.

Neutrophils normally circulate in the blood but enter lung tissue in response to infection. In the baby airway model, researchers found that the neutrophils that entered the lung tissue were more activated and triggered a stronger inflammatory reaction than in the adult model.

This effect depended on the immune cells physically moving through the infected tissue, not just responding to chemical signals released by it, making this type of model essential for studying it.

This suggests it’s the infant airway itself, not just the virus, that ramps up the immune response and causes damage to the lungs.

First author, Dr Machaela Palor (UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health), said: “These findings help explain why RSV is often much more severe in infants than in adults. The paediatric airway actively shapes how immune cells behave during the infection.”

The researchers then tested two antiviral drugs (remdesivir and RSV604). Both stopped the virus from multiplying, but only RSV604 also calmed the overactive immune response, reducing levels of a key inflammatory protein released by white blood cells – high levels of which are linked to more severe RSV disease in babies.

Remdesivir had no effect on this, suggesting that not all antivirals are equal when it comes to protecting the infant airway from immune-driven damage.

This suggests that treating severe RSV in babies may require more than just stopping the virus – it may also be important to calm an overactive immune response.

The researchers hope their findings and the new approach to research on RSV will accelerate the development of treatments better tailored to infants.

Dr Smith said: “Our model gives us a way to assess both sides of the problem at once. We can not only ask whether the drug stops the virus but also whether it helps control immune response in the infant airway.

“This work reinforces the idea that age matters in respiratory infection. Understanding how infant airways shape immune responses will be key to designing safer and more effective RSV treatments.”

Source: University College London