Tag: antiretroviral therapy

Categories : Healthcare Politics and RegulationsTags :

Why Pharmacists Still Can’t Prescribe ARVs, Months After Court Gave the Green Light

On By ModernMedia
Specially trained pharmacists will soon be allowed to dispense antiretrovirals without a doctor’s script. Photo by National Cancer Institute on Unsplash

By Catherine Tomlinson

A Supreme Court of Appeal ruling in October 2025 cleared the way for specially trained and permitted pharmacists to dispense antiretroviral medicines without a doctor’s script. Seven months later, no pharmacists are yet providing these services. Spotlight explores the reasons for the delay.

After a three-and a half year court battle between a group of private doctors and the South African Pharmacy Council (SAPC), the Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) cleared the way for the SAPC to implement pharmacist-initiated management of antiretroviral treatment (PIMART) in October 2025.

The SAPC welcomed the ruling with a bullish press conference promising rapid implementation of PIMART. “The South African Pharmacy Council, together with stakeholders and the Department of Health, will work with speed to ensure that PIMART-trained pharmacists join other primary healthcare practitioners in providing primary care in relation to HIV and Aids,” said Mogologolo Phasha, president of the SAPC, at the time.

Vincent Tlala, CEO and Registrar of the SAPC, also in October 2025, said that the SAPC aimed to issue an e-note inviting pharmacists to apply for the PIMART permits in November. However, seven months later, this has still not happened and no pharmacists in the country are yet permitted to provide PIMART services.

What is PIMART?

PIMART stands for pharmacist-initiated management of antiretroviral treatment. It is a form of task-shifting that allows pharmacists to provide some limited HIV services that are currently only provided by doctors and nurses. The programme seeks to better utilise pharmacists in the country’s HIV response and relieve some of the burden on overcrowded and under resourced public clinics. It will also offer a route into treatment for people who are not willing or able to visit clinics.

It is intended that, under the PIMART programme, pharmacists that have completed a dedicated training programme and have received a special permit from the Director-General of Health will be authorised to provide first-line antiretroviral treatment to people with uncomplicated HIV without a doctor’s script. They will also be allowed to dispense HIV prevention medicines without a doctor’s script – this includes both pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) and post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP). PrEP is taken prior to sex to prevent potential infection while PEP is taken shortly after a possible HIV exposure to prevent infection.

Why is PIMART needed?

PIMART was proposed by the SAPC in response to a request from the health department for the SAPC to design an intervention to enable pharmacists to take on a greater role in the country’s HIV response.

South Africa has adopted the UNAIDS 95-95-95 targets that aim to ensure that 95% of people living with HIV know their status, 95% of people diagnosed with HIV are on treatment, and 95% of people on treatment are virally suppressed (and therefore cannot transmit HIV onwards).

According to new estimates from Thembisa, the leading mathematical model of South Africa’s HIV epidemic, 7.9 million people are living with HIV in South Africa. Ninety six percent of people living with HIV know their status, yet only 82% of people who know they are HIV positive are on antiretroviral treatment.

While South Africa’s health system should be commended for the fact that around 6.2 million people are taking HIV treatment, it is concerning that 1.7 million people living with HIV are not yet on treatment. In recognition of this problem, the health department has launched the “Close the Gap” campaign.

The thinking behind PIMART is that pharmacies can help close the gap by providing an important third option to people who are disinclined or unable to access HIV treatment from public clinics or private sector doctors.

More urgent than ever following US funding cuts

While PIMART was always intended to help identify patients falling through the gaps between South Africa’s public and private health sectors and to link them to care, the need for this third option is now more urgent than ever. US funding cuts over the last 15 months or so have led to the closure of many NGO-run clinics that previously provided HIV treatment and prevention services to populations at high risk of HIV who often face stigma at traditional health facilities. These groups include sex workers, men who have sex with men, and people who inject drugs.

In addition to expanding access to HIV treatment, PIMART aims to increase access to PrEP and PEP to prevent new HIV infections. While the full impact of US funding cuts on these services remains unclear, the cuts likely contributed to the slight decline in PrEP use in South Africa seen in 2025, following seven years of steady growth in PrEP uptake.

Graph by Spotlight. Data courtesy of the Thembisa model.

Finger pointing and lack of accountability

Seven months after the Supreme Court of Appeal ruled that the SAPC could implement PIMART and the SAPC promised to move rapidly in implementing PIMART, pharmacists have still not been invited to apply for permits and no PIMART permits have yet been issued to pharmacists.

When asked why the programme remains unimplemented, the SAPC pointed to the Southern African HIV Clinicians Society’s (SAHCS) PIMART training course as the cause of the delay.

SAHCS is the only entity in the country providing PIMART training to pharmacists. In October 2025, Mokoena said several groups had expressed interest in becoming accredited to provide PIMART training. However, on 14 May 2026, Tlala told Spotlight: “While we have invited existing providers of pharmacy education in South Africa to offer (the course), the South African Pharmacy Council is yet to receive applications for the accreditation of the PIMART supplementary training course.”

He added: “Currently, the Southern African HIV Clinicians Society are the only approved provider for the PIMART short course.”

So, what’s going on with SAHCS’ PIMART training?

PIMART used to be on a very different timeline before it got tangled up in the court processes that led to the October 2025 SCA judgment. Back in July 2021, Spotlight reported that the launch of PIMART was imminent, and indeed, that was roughly the timeline the SAHCS training had been working toward.

In fact, the SAHCS has offered a PIMART training course for pharmacists that want to provide PIMART services since 2019. Professor Natalie Shellack, chairperson of the SAPC Education Committee, said in October 2025 that this course was developed jointly by SAHCS and SAPC.

Over a thousand pharmacists have completed SAHCS’s original PIMART training course as continuous professional development (CPD) training. But after the October 2025 SCA ruling, Lizeth Kruger, Dischem’s Clinical Executive, told Spotlight that due to the time lapse between the initial training and court ruling, Dischem pharmacists “will need to do a refresher course to ensure compliance and up-to-date knowledge”.

While SAHCS’s PIMART course has not yet been accredited by the SAPC as a PIMART course, it is accredited as a CPD course for pharmacists. Tlala told Spotlight in May that it has not been accredited as a PIMART course because of an identified “gap” in the course.

“The gap identified between the short course and the approved qualification standard meant that the approved provider of the short course, the Southern African HIV Clinicians Society, had to conduct a gap analysis and develop a bridging course to enable pharmacists trained in the short course to access the full PIMART scope of services,” said Tlala.

In response to questions about the “gap” in their training course identified by the SAPC, SAHCS’s CEO Dr Fiona Storie told Spotlight on 19 May: “SAHCS has completed a full review and update of the PIMART training course in line with the requirements for accreditation as a supplementary training course (i.e. not just a CPD accredited course).”

“As PIMART training was originally provided from 2019, there is a need for pharmacists to undergo refresher training since the field of HIV medicine is evolving and clinical recommendations change over time,” said Storie. She added: “SAHCS’ recommendation is that pharmacists undertake the newly updated PIMART training course as either a refresher/bridging course or, if not previously trained, as a new course.”

“SAHCS is engaging with SAPC to finalise the accreditation of the updated PIMART course as a refresher course and a new supplementary training course to make it available as soon as possible,” Storie said.

Limiting PIMART’s scope

Tlala told Spotlight that because of the “gap” in SAHCS’s training course, the SAPC has asked the Director-General of Health to grant limited scope PIMART permits.

“The Director-General: Health has been requested to issue a limited scope permit granting PIMART-trained pharmacists’ access to those services fully addressed in the short course previously delivered by the South African HIV Clinicians Society,” he said.

The health department confirmed to Spotlight that this request was received on 23 April 2026.

Neither the SAPC nor the Department of Health responded to Spotlight’s requests for clarification on which PIMART services the SAPC had proposed for inclusion in the limited-scope permits.

Angela Tembo, director of pharmacy health at the research centre Ezintsha, told Spotlight that she understands that the limited scope permits that the SAPC has requested the Director-General of Health to grant “will be limited to HIV prevention (PrEP and PEP) and not treatment”.

“Our understanding is that the delays [in implementing PIMART] relate to ongoing discussions around training requirements, accreditation processes, and the practical implementation pathway following the SCA ruling,” she added.

Tlala said as soon as the Director-General of Health approves the limited-scope permits, the SAPC will publicly communicate the launch of the PIMART programme and the services that may be accessed under such a permit.

“The full PIMART scope of services will only be available once the Southern African HIV Clinicians Society has finalised and submitted a bridging course following gap analysis or, alternatively, once another training provider is accredited to provide the PIMART Supplementary Training course,” he added.

Republished from Sptolight under a Creative Commons licence.

Read the original article.

Categories : HIVTags :

Most Cases of HIV Persistence in Blood After Treatment Explained by Defective Copies

On By ModernMedia

Study strongly suggests that most persistent cases of viral detection, despite ideal HIV drug therapy, are not due to virus transmission or a rebound of active disease

Colourised transmission electron micrograph of an HIV-1 virus particle (yellow/gold) budding from the plasma membrane of an infected H9 T cell (purple/green).

Antiretroviral drugs for HIV infection have enabled most people living with the virus to live long and healthy lives. However, a small portion of people experience detectable – and worrisome – traces of the virus that causes AIDS despite strict adherence to long-term treatment regimens and the absence of symptoms. New findings published in Nature Communications suggest that most cases of this phenomenon, which is called non-suppressible viraemia, are explained by defective and noninfectious copies of the virus. The research was partially supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (NIH).

The study, which involved more than 50 people, found that while traces of HIV-1 RNA can persist in blood after optimal therapy, cases of non-suppressible viraemia are driven by HIV-1 RNA with defects in a piece of the RNA known as 5’-leader.

“From a clinical perspective, this is important because people with HIV are taught that the absolute goal of their medication is to achieve undetectable viral load and they worry,” says Francesco R. Simonetti, MBChBD, PhD, the senior study author and an assistant professor of medicine in the Division of Infectious Diseases at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine. The new findings, says Simonetti and his team, should provide relief to many people living with HIV who fear a viral rebound or who are concerned about transmitting the virus to partners despite taking effective treatment.

For the study, the investigators examined blood samples from 52 people living with HIV who had detectable loads of the virus despite taking long-term antiretroviral drug therapy.

These samples, which were assessed from 32 people and compared to an additional 20 samples, were collected between 2021 and 2025. The majority of participants were white men, between ages 58 and 68, and received care in the U.S., Canada and Denmark. The researchers found that most detectable forms of the virus, around 95%, were due to defective copies, and most defects were due to mutations or deletions in the 5’-leader region of HIV-1 RNA. This region is known to orchestrate the production of copies of the virus, but in this case the defects prevented the generation of infectious virus.

Modern antiretroviral therapies, which date back to 1996, prevent HIV from infecting new populations of immune system cells, but aren’t able to retroactively prevent previously infected cells from releasing HIV viral particles. Since those cells usually represent a small portion of infected cells after a person is on stable therapy, most people who take antiretroviral therapies are able to bring their viral loads to clinically undetectable levels in their blood. 

However, in some cases, which are estimated to occur less than 1% of the time, people may experience clinically detectable levels after taking long-term antiretroviral drug therapy. This could happen years later, or, in less frequent cases, they may have never achieved undetectable levels.

This new study offers evidence that clinicians can now study the virus in blood plasma and confirm if clinically detectable levels are due to defective copies released from one or a few T-cell clones, says Simonetti. If so, he adds, this could eliminate the need for extra medications and could prevent related complications. It could also help people living with HIV have access to surgeries or other procedures, such as hip or knee replacements or organ transplants, and participate in clinical studies if they know they have HIV under control.

The assay taht the researchers created and used to confirm the defective copies of the virus for this study is cost-effective and can be broadly used in HIV clinics and research settings. Similar to using a liquid biopsy to detect cancer mutations in DNA, the assay, which is called CLAWS (Capturing 5′ Leader Anomalies Without Sequencing), uses advanced technology to identify detectable viral loads that are due to defective copies.

“We know that these defective proviruses cannot infect new cells, but they are still clinically relevant,” says Simonetti. “Think of how many extra visits, extra drugs, extra costs and tests they’ve been causing.”

“It’s also clear from the new study that, over time on treatment, intact proviruses that make virus are pruned away, while defective ones escape the immune system,” he says. “Now we want to understand these differences in immune recognition to uncover HIV’s vulnerabilities.”

Source: John Hopkins Medicine

Categories : HIV NeurologyTags :

Early Treatment Helps Protect the Brains of People Living with HIV

On By ModernMedia
If someone living with HIV is not on antiretroviral therapy, the virus can cause inflammation in, among other places, the brain. Photo by Anna Shvets

By Biénne Huisman

Antiretroviral therapy has shifted HIV from a fatal to a chronic condition. But neuropsychiatrists say it is imperative for people living with the virus to start treatment immediately as the “duration of untreated exposure” may cause irreversible brain damage and impact long-term cognitive health. 

It has been recognised for decades that cognitive impairment is a potential complication of HIV infection. Questions over how likely and how serious this potential complication is have become more urgent over time as the population of people living with HIV ages – ageing after all also increases the risk of cognitive decline.

There were around 1.75 million people over the age of 50 living with HIV in South Africa in 2024, according to Thembisa, the leading mathematical model of HIV in the country. This is just over 20% of the estimated eight million HIV positive people in the country. A study published in the Lancet medical journal also has the number at around 20% in sub-Saharan Africa.

This is a delicate field of enquiry as researchers walk a tightrope to avoid “the burden of double stigma”, while conceptualising the necessary tools to best diagnose brain problems and suitable interventions.

Within as little as two weeks

At Groote Schuur Hospital’s Neuroscience Institute, Professor John Joska, director of the University of Cape Town’s (UCT’s) HIV Mental Health Research Unit, explains that HIV can enter the brain within as little as two weeks after the initial infection – primarily through infected white blood cells, such as lymphocytes. If a person is not on antiretroviral therapy, the virus can cause inflammation in the brain and possibly also tissue damage.

“The brain is a protected compartment,” says Joska. “A theory as to how the virus, which is a protein particle, gets into the brain is through infected lymphocytes. This doesn’t directly infect nerve cells, what we call neurons. It infects other supporting tissues and cells in the brain, causing an inflammation which damages typically the white matter of the brain. Over time, that inflammation can cause loss of neurons, but indirectly.”

While antiretroviral therapy is crucial for clearing and suppressing HIV in all body compartments, including in the brain, he says that it does not reverse damage that occurred before the treatment was started.

“Today, people with HIV are living near normal lifespans,” he says. “The question is, will the fact that they’ve had HIV, with some duration of untreated exposure and potential loss of brain tissue, cause them to be at higher risk than the average person for developing dementias of old age – which really are mainly Alzheimer’s disease or vascular dementia.” It is these longer-term effects that are the main concern when it comes to the impact of HIV on the brain.

Part of the problem is that South Africa not only has an ageing population of people living with HIV, but many of these people would only have started treatment quite long after they contracted the virus. One key reason for this is the South African government’s reluctance to make antiretroviral treatment available in the early 2000s. It has been estimated that those delays resulted in over 300 000 avoidable deaths – they may also be contributing to brain health issues now and in the future.

From efavirenz to dolutegravir

Apart from HIV itself, some of the medicines used to treat the infection have also had an impact on the brain.

In 2019, the standard HIV treatment in South Africa changed from a three-drug combination containing an antiretroviral drug called efavirenz, to a combination containing the drug dolutegravir. This shift had mental health benefits, as evidenced in research lead by Joska’s fellow UCT Neuro-HIV researcher, Associate Professor Sam Nightingale.

Joska says: “The study looked at the period from 2017 to 2020 and the switch from efavirenz to dolutegravir based treatment. It was well known that efavirenz caused, certainly for the first two months, a bunch of psychotropic or psychological issues like nightmares or anxiety, even psychosis for some people. But our findings showed people who switched to dolutegravir actually do very well. They look more like people without HIV after eight months. So dolutegravir has been a huge advantage, not only because it’s robust, but because it’s neuro-protective.”

New models for HIV and cognitive impairment

A shift is underway in how experts are thinking about cognitive impairment in people with HIV. Some neuropsychiatrists, including Joska, are recommending a shift away from the 2007 HIV-Associated Neurocognitive Disorders model, arguing that its cognitive test scores do not adequately account for variables such as education and socioeconomic background, and that it can overdiagnose impairment. The argument is set out in an article, lead-authored by Nightingale, that was published in the journal Nature Reviews Neurology in 2023.

The authors argue that a label of cognitive impairment might cause a “double burden of stigma” for people living with HIV – affecting self-esteem, inciting fear and prompting further discrimination against persons already subject to stigma as it stands. To illustrate the point, they point out how, up until recently, people with HIV in the United Kingdom could not become airline pilots due to concerns over cognitive impairment. However, following a campaign by a pilot living with HIV, the United Kingdom’s Civil Aviation Authority removed the ban in 2022.

Nightingale and his colleagues argue that traditional test scores be used in conjunction with real-life symptoms and medical evidence of brain problems. It introduces the conceptual model of HIV-Associated Brain Injury, which refers specifically to damage caused by the virus. This distinguishes it from other causes of cognitive impairment such as depression, substance abuse, diabetes and cardiovascular disease. As Spotlight previously reported, HIV is also associated with an increased risk of depression, though this is at least partially driven by social factors.

Lower cognitive function associated with late diagnosis

At the 2026 Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections hosted in Denver in the United States in late February, these issues were tabled at a discussion titled “When I’m 64: Neurodegeneration, Epigenetic Aging, and Cognition in Older People With HIV.”

Professor John Joska is the director of the University of Cape Town’s HIV Mental Health Research Unit. (Photo: Biénne Huisman/Spotlight)

In his presentation, Professor Alan Winston of Imperial College London, also a member of the International HIV-Cognition Working Group, and a frequent co-author alongside Joska and Nightingale, relayed existing research findings that on average, people living with HIV have lower cognitive function – including memory, attention span and executive function like planning – compared to people who don’t have HIV of the same age. He said that this manifests as an increased risk of lower grade early dementia.

Like Joska, Winston stressed that the most deteriorated cognitive function in people living with HIV is associated with untreated HIV and late HIV diagnosis. He reiterated that starting HIV treatment soon after diagnosis is protective, and that viral suppression is associated with better cognition. In groups of patients with HIV well controlled on dolutegravir-based HIV treatment, cognition appears similar to HIV negative groups, he said.

HIV clinicians need to pay better attention to the brain

In an impassioned presentation, Dr Shibani Mukerji, Associate Professor of Neurology at Harvard Medical School, argued that protecting the brain is an overlooked frontier in effective HIV treatment, and that clinicians need to pay more attention to it.

“By the time patients and clinicians notice cognitive decline – generally and in HIV – the damage to the brain is done and lives are affected negatively. People don’t raise cognitive concerns early enough due to stigma, fear, [and] lack of recognition of the issues. It is seen as ‘just getting old’,” she said.

Mukerji emphasised the need to prioritise brain health. “HIV doctors and treatment programmes are focused, almost exclusively, on viral load as the marker of successful treatment. They may be thinking laterally and consider TB and other infections, maybe cardiovascular disease – but they are definitely not paying enough attention to brain health. HIV doctors aren’t aware enough of brain health issues in people living with HIV, and even when they are, they often don’t feel comfortable diagnosing or managing it, so it is under recognised and under diagnosed.”

The perception that there is no way to manage or treat cognitive decline –generally and in people living with HIV – is wrong, she said, adding that optimising physical, mental and social health is critical for brain health.

“Almost half of dementia risk [in people in general] is linked to preventable causes,” she told conference delegates, along with a slide listing preventable causes including loss of hearing, social isolation, cardiovascular disease and depression.

She explained: “If someone has cognitive decline and for example you improve their hearing – if they have hearing issues – and you work on their social isolation, and treat their vascular disease, and treat their depression, you can see a marked improvement in their cognition.”

Ending her presentation with a twist of humour, Mukerji’s last slide referred to the session’s title, a reference to the Beatles song on aging “When I am 64”. She printed the song’s lyrics: “When I get older, losing my hair, many years from now…”, closing her talk by saying: “It’s okay to stand up and sing, in fact your doctor might prescribe it.”

Categories : HIV Medical IndustryTags :

Cipla Confirms Continued Support for ARV Supply Following Changes in Supplier Landscape

On By ModernMedia
Photo by Towfiqu barbhuiya

Cipla Medpro South Africa reaffirmed its commitment to ensuring the uninterrupted supply of critical antiretroviral (ARV) medicines to the Department of Health. It is essential that people living with HIV have uninterrupted access to these life-saving medicines. Any disruption of supply puts patients at risk of developing resistance to the drugs or adversely affecting health outcomes. According to Statistics South Africa, the number of people living with HIV in the country is estimated to be approximately 8 million (12,7% of the population)[1].

Recently, two suppliers who were awarded the current antiretroviral (ARV) tender, Barrs Pharmaceuticals Industries (Pty) Ltd and Innovata Pharmaceuticals (Pty) Ltd (subsidiaries of Avacare Health), have entered business rescue.

Cipla acknowledges the uncertainty this may create within the ARV supply chain and underscores its readiness to assist in maintaining stability and continuity.

Cipla has been manufacturing tenofovir/lamivudine/dolutegravir (TLD) for the government for the past 7 years, and has been one of the main suppliers of ARVs to the government for more than 12 years. Cipla has made significant investments in its local manufacturing facility, upgrading the capacity of the ARV production line with the installation of a new Countec bottle line and have increased its tablet filing capacity by 190%. The company is able to locally produce 475 million tablets annually and has upscaled its manufacturing capabilities to ensure sufficient capacity to meet current demand and support near‑term growth, while reinforcing Cipla’s commitment to secure and reliable ARV supply.

“We have mobilised resources to help maintain equitable access to quality, affordable critical medication. Cipla confirms its willingness to support national requirements under the current tender agreement and, if needed, contribute meaningfully to any supplementary procurement processes to safeguard patient access to essential treatment. We want people to live a long and healthy life as part of our commitment to caring for life,” said Paul Miller, CEO of Cipla Africa.

“In addition, we believe this tender presents an opportunity to further advance government’s commitment to strengthening local manufacturing capacity. By ensuring greater support for locally produced medicines, future allocations could meaningfully contribute to South Africa’s industrial development agenda while maintaining continuity of supply,” said Miller.

The total ARV tender is for a period of three years, and is worth an estimated R15.5bn, of which the TLD component comprises R12.6bn.

Categories : HIVTags :

HIV Funding Still Falls Short of Targets After Pledges: What’s at Stake

On By ModernMedia
Photo by Miguel Á. Padriñán

Melanie Bisnauth, University of the Witwatersrand

The US government paused all foreign assistance in January 2025. This abrupt decision affected the delivery of life-saving HIV medicines and the provision of HIV prevention services to millions of people. A UNAIDS report estimates there could be an additional 6 million new HIV infections and 4 million Aids-related deaths by 2029 if the world does not act.

In November 2025, a global health initiative, The Global Fund, raised US$11.34 billion for HIV/Aids, tuberculosis and malaria. Melanie Bisnauth, a public health professional in healthcare systems strengthening and HIV/Aids leadership, discusses how far this latest funding could go and how African nations can tackle the dwindling funding for HIV/Aids control.

What is the funding status for HIV/Aids?

Raising US$11.34 billion is significant but it falls short of the US$18 billion target. The Global Fund is trying to raise US$18 billion for its work from 2027 to 2029. The Global Fund is a worldwide partnership to end the epidemic of HIV/Aids, tuberculosis and malaria and ensure a healthier, safer and more equitable future for all.

It is only a partial response to the global funding gaps.

The US pledged US$4.6 billion to the Global Fund during the fund’s summit in November 2025, on the side of the G20 meeting in South Africa. It was a reduction from its previous pledge of US$6 billion to support prevention, treatment, care and related services for the three diseases. But it is also an indication that the US has not abandoned all multilateral global health efforts. It remains the largest single contribution to the Global Fund 2027 to 2029 cycle.

The shortfall may strain existing programmes and delay expansion of life-saving interventions for HIV/Aids, tuberculosis and malaria.

HIV remains a major global public health issue, having claimed an estimated 44.1 million lives to date. An estimated 40.8 million people were living with HIV at the end of 2024, 65% of whom are in the WHO African region.

Job losses could create inefficiencies or service reductions. Building a sustainable HIV response and meeting key goals was already challenging before the sharp funding decline in 2025. Over 11 million people had unsuppressed viral loads in 2024.

Overall, while the funds raised demonstrate continued global solidarity, they are insufficient to fully compensate for the US withdrawal and broader declines in donor support.

There are potentially long-term consequences. Reduced funding and service disruptions threaten to reverse years of progress. Infections could rise, especially in communities where viral suppression was already low. Lack of service delivery and supply of treatment will weaken trust in health systems and can lead to treatment interruptions, drug resistance and poorer health outcomes.

As the Global Fund’s executive director said at the Replenishment Summit, “the old model” of development funding is over. This model is the heavy reliance on international funding like USAID and other donor organisations.

It’s essential for countries to become more self-reliant. But the statement warned that too abrupt a transition could be dangerous.

I fear that the COVID-19 pandemic has already taken a toll on the quality of care provided. Healthcare systems are already overburdened.

National governments have to step up and locally support their healthcare systems, collaborate and build together, and strengthen their health funding structures.

What should the response be for better HIV funding in Africa?

Africa’s HIV response should be multi-pronged.

After attending the Africa Summit in Geneva in May 2025, stakeholders, country representatives, donor agencies and NGOs expressed a key message: those involved in the sector should not reinvent the entire wheel. There is value in the knowledge gained from programming, technical expertise, data insights, partnerships, communities and global health networks should be used to strengthen, adapt and scale what already works.

This will ensure that Africa’s HIV response remains community-centred, evidence-driven, and resilient in the face of emerging challenges.

The global health climate has changed and communities have lost trust because of severely disrupted or even completely cut programmes. African governments must allocate their own resources for HIV programmes, through budget prioritisation, health insurance schemes, and innovative financing such as public-private partnerships. Improvements, such as integrating HIV services into primary care, using data-driven targeting, and negotiating lower drug costs can maximise impact.

Strengthening regional collaborations and pooled procurement through organisations like the African Union or regional health bodies can improve bargaining power and reduce dependency on external aid. A balanced mix of donor support, domestic financing and operational efficiency is essential to maintain gains and expand access to treatment for all in need.

It is important not to rely solely on international support or one funding body. Diversifying funding portfolios is critical.

What effects has the withdrawal of US funds had?

Reduced US contributions led to immediate financial shortfalls, threatening ongoing HIV prevention and treatment programmes.

For example, some clinic supply and services faced disruption in delivery and supply of antiretroviral therapy, and stock-outs of treatment and malaria nets.

The world is still likely to feel the impact in the coming months. For example:

  • Progress towards epidemic control could slow, potentially increasing illness and death.
  • Programmes that relied heavily on US support have already scaled back services or will do so.
  • Funding uncertainty remains a major concern. Governments will have to reallocate limited domestic resources or seek alternative donors.
  • Global health co-ordination, technical assistance and advocacy efforts may be weakened. In the past these supported robust HIV responses in Africa in progress toward the UNAIDS targets.
  • Reliance on fragmented funding streams will increase.

How can African countries better fund their HIV programmes?

They can take steps that involve a mix of domestic revenue generation, efficiency gains and strategic partnerships:

  • diversify funding through raising domestic revenue, such as earmarked taxes
  • expand the reach of social health insurance coverage
  • leverage corporate investment and innovation through public-private partnerships
  • negotiate pooled procurement of drugs and diagnostics regionally to reduce costs
  • involve communities in decision making, which will help strengthen sustainability
  • integrate HIV programmes into broader health systems – it improves efficiency, reducing duplication and operational costs.

Melanie Bisnauth, Doctoral Researcher, School of Public Health and Public Health Technical Advisor, Anova Health Institute, University of the Witwatersrand

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Categories : HIVTags :

Trial Results Shows the Value of Patient Navigation in Humanising HIV Care

On By ModernMedia

Eastern Cape HIV Programme demonstrates success in resource-constrained setting

Photo by Pexels on Pixabay

A new randomised controlled trial conducted in the Eastern Cape has shown that adding structured patient navigation to same-day antiretroviral therapy (ART) can make a meaningful difference for people newly diagnosed with HIV. The trial found that patients who received support from trained navigators were far more likely to stay in care and keep their viral load low over six months. Those with navigator support had a 79% retention rate, compared with 64% under standard care.

Among patients who achieved a viral load of fewer than 50 copies per millilitre, 64% remained in care, compared to just 39% without this extra support(1). Patient navigation combines personal support, such as home or virtual check-ins and WhatsApp reminders, with practical help like linking people to services and monitoring their progress. It was especially effective for people who started treatment on the same day as their diagnosis.

“This approach humanises HIV care. It builds a bridge between the clinic and the community, helping patients stay connected to treatment and ultimately saving lives,” said lead author Siyakudumisa Nontamo, Facility Team Lead: Care & Treatment Programme at TB HIV Care.

In August 2024 the Human Sciences Research Council released findings from the Sixth South African HIV Prevalence, Incidence, and Behaviour Survey (SABSSM VI) for the Eastern Cape. The results show that HIV prevalence in the province stabilised, moving from 15.9% in 2017 to 13.7% in 2022. This is an estimated 980 000 people living with HIV, down from about 1 million in 2017. Access to treatment has improved significantly. ART coverage increased from 67.8% in 2017 to 83.5% in 2022, meaning about 723 000 people in the province are now receiving treatment. However, gaps remain among young people: only 70.9% of adolescents and youth aged 15–24 living with HIV are on ART, compared to 84.8% of adults aged 25-49. Among females, coverage is much lower for young women (68.7%) than for women aged 25-49 (88.2%). ART use also varies across districts, ranging from 69.4% in Nelson Mandela Bay to 92.0% in Alfred Nzo(2). Nationally, the proportion of people living with HIV who are currently on antiretroviral treatment (ART) rose to 80.9% in 2022, up from 63.7% in 2017.

Despite major advances in antiretroviral therapy, retention in care remains a persistent challenge within South Africa’s HIV programme, especially in rural provinces such as the Eastern Cape. Many patients initiate treatment but later disengage due to stigma, transport difficulties, and limited ongoing support. The study shows that low-cost, human-centred interventions can significantly strengthen treatment outcomes. The trial, titled “Impact of Patient Navigation on Retention in Care and HIV Viral Load Suppression Among Newly Diagnosed Persons Living with HIV in the Eastern Cape,” compared standard HIV care to an approach where trained patient navigators provided ongoing support to patients starting antiretroviral therapy (ART). Beyond improved retention and viral suppression, the trial also showed that patients supported by navigators experienced fewer deaths and dropouts, with substantially lower losses to follow-up and reduced mortality than those receiving standard care, ultimately strengthening HIV programmes(1).

Patient navigation, in particular, helps bridge the gap by pairing practical healthcare coordination with empathy and community-based follow-up. Navigators assist patients with managing appointments, maintaining adherence, and accessing psychosocial services, thereby fostering trust, continuity, and sustained engagement in care. This approach aligns with South Africa’s national HIV strategy, which prioritises differentiated, patient-centred models of care to achieve the UNAIDS 95-95-95 targets.

At scale, TB HIV Care’s programmes are grounded in person-centred, integrated service models that reflect the real lives and needs of people affected by HIV and TB. This study reinforces TB HIV Care’s belief that support beyond clinic walls is essential for achieving lasting impact. In the 2024/25 reporting period, the organisation reached more than 1.9 million people with HIV testing services and initiated 27,873 individuals on ART, achieving a 95% viral suppression rate among clients in care.

“By bridging the gap between diagnosis and ongoing care, patient navigation aligns with our outreach for key populations and our shift toward holistic service delivery. We look forward to translating this evidence into practice, ensuring fewer people fall through the cracks and more sustain treatment success”, said Professor Harry Hausler, CEO at TB HIV Care.

Additional findings from the Sixth South African HIV Prevalence, Incidence, and Behaviour Survey (SABSSM VI) for the Eastern Cape.

  • In the Eastern Cape, HIV remains most common among adults aged 25-49, with a prevalence of 27.7%, and women in this age group are especially affected at 35.4% compared to 17.1% for men.
  • The survey also found geographic differences: HIV prevalence among men was highest in urban areas (8.7%), while among women it was highest in rural informal or tribal areas (19.8%).
  • By district, prevalence was highest in Chris Hani (14.4%), Amathole (14.1%), Alfred Nzo (13.9%), and lowest in Nelson Mandela Bay (9.7%).
  • At a national level, the survey showed that 81.4% of all people living with HIV were virally suppressed. The survey found encouraging progress in the Eastern Cape, where viral load suppression (VLS) among people living with HIV rose to 79.3% in 2022, up from 66.3% in 2017. However, children aged 0-14 years had much lower suppression levels, at 61.4%. Among people aged 15-49 years living with HIV, 78.6% were virally suppressed. Within this group, women had far higher suppression rates (83.9%) than men (65.4%).

About the Randomized Controlled Trial

The randomised controlled trial involved participants from HIV testing sites in the O.R. Tambo District (Flagstaff, Mthatha Gateway, and Tsolo Clinics). It was approved by the Eastern Cape Health Research Committee and Walter Sisulu University’s Ethics Committee. The study was supported by the Chemical Industries Education and Training Authority (CHIETA) and the South African Medical Research Council’s Strategic Health Innovation Partnerships (SHIP).

References:

  1. Nontamo, S., Kamsu, G.T., Ndebia, E.J., et al. Impact of Patient Navigation on Retention in Care and HIV Viral Load Suppression Among Newly Diagnosed Persons Living with HIV in the Eastern Cape – South Africa. Access.
  2. Human Sciences Research Council. Sixth South African HIV Prevalence, Incidence, and Behaviour Survey (SABSSM VI). Access.

Categories : Ethics and Law HIVTags :

Pharmacists Can Treat People with HIV, Appeal Court Rules

On By ModernMedia

“Legitimate and compelling public interests” to allow pharmacists to initiate antiretroviral treatment, says judge

By Tania Broughton

Pharmacists can initiate people with HIV on antiretroviral treatment, the Supreme Court of Appeal has ruled. Photo: GroundUp Staff

The Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) has dismissed, with costs, an appeal by a doctor’s organisation, the IPA Foundation, aimed at stopping specially trained pharmacists from treating people with HIV and TB.

The IPA first took its dispute with the South African Pharmacy Council (SAPC) to the Gauteng High Court in Pretoria. In 2023, Judge Elmarie van der Schyff ruled in favour of the pharmacists, giving a judicial go-ahead for the council to introduce its Pharmacy-Initiated Management of Antiretroviral Treatment (PIMART) initiative.

However the IPA Foundation, intent on having the initiative set aside, took this ruling on appeal to the SCA. In that court, five judges this week ruled against it. The ruling came nearly 11 months after the case was heard, far more than the three months that judicial norms provide for when a judgment is reserved.

Read the judgment

Justice Tati Makgoka, writing for the court, said the initiative was created in response to a persistent rise in new HIV infection rates.

The SAPC, at the department’s request, deemed PIMART suitable for addressing this issue.

“As the high court correctly found, the SAPC evaluated the risks associated with pharmacists initiating first-line ART [antiretroviral treatment] and TPT [tuberculosis preventive therapy] as well as providing medicines for PrEP [Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis of HIV] and PEP [Post Exposure Prophylaxis of HIV], considering the risks when deciding to approve the PIMART training.

“The uncontested evidence presented by the SAPC demonstrates that the approved accreditation process for PIMART was rigorous and thorough,” Makgoka said.

In her previous judgment, Van Der Schyff had noted that a pilot project had emphasised the value of the initiative, which was in line with the World Health Organisation’s vision to promote widely accessible primary health care.

“The untapped value of pharmacists in fighting HIV was also emphasised by the efficient role pharmacies played in meeting health care needs and providing health care services during the Covid-19 pandemic,” she said.

“The need to widen access to first line ART and TPT therapy on a community level is not a figment of SAPC’s imagination but a dire need that is also evinced in other countries.”

The IPA Foundation had approached the Pretoria court, under the Promotion of Administrative Justice Act (PAJA), seeking to review and set aside the SAPC’s decision to implement PIMART.

IPA claimed that the SAPC had failed to give interested parties an adequate opportunity to comment before the initiative was implemented. It further contended that PIMART unjustifiably encroached on the domain of medical practitioners and was in conflict with legislation.

On appeal, the IPA persisted with these arguments.

Dealing with the background, Justice Makgoka said the SAPC had published a notice in the government gazette in March 2021 regarding the proposed adoption of PIMART, giving interested parties 60 days to comment. This resulted in government approval later that year.

It was only after this that the IPA submitted its comments and objections.

Following engagements, the IPA lodged the review application in the high court.

On the issue that the IPA and its members claimed they were not given sufficient notice of PIMART, because it was advertised in the government gazette during the Covid-19 pandemic – Makgoka said there was no suggestion that the pandemic had “paralysed the administrative functions” of the IPA.

Remarkably, the judge said, the IPA had not suggested that the notice did not come to its attention, finding that adequate notice had been given. Makgoka said that several other organisations had submitted comments during the prescribed period.

He said the IPA had also not challenged the validity of the Pharmacy Act, which specified publication in the gazette and in the absence of that, it was not open for it to say the publication was inadequate.

Makgoka said the IPA had introduced the issue of “rationality” only in its notice of appeal. However, the court had dealt with this because there was no prejudice to the SAPC.

In ruling on this issue, he said PIMART was a crucial intervention in the public interest, which had been devised by a group of medical experts.

“Through PIMART, the SAPC aimed to improve access to healthcare. Contrary to the IPA’s contentions, PIMART is an essential intervention in the fight against HIV/AIDS. Its introduction constitutes a rational legislative and practical measure with the competence of the SAPC as an organ of the state in enhancing access to healthcare for HIV treatment, in fulfilment of the state’s obligation under the Constitution,” Makgoka said.

“These are legitimate and compelling public interests.”

He said the IPA was wrong in believing that PIMART was a blanket licence for pharmacists to treat HIV patients.

“Its scope is limited and applies only to accredited pharmacists. It will not alter the scope of practice for medical practitioners. The fact is that medical practitioners do not have the exclusive rights to care for people living with HIV/AIDS. This is a collaborative effort involving various health professionals.”

The IPA had also submitted that pharmacists were not authorised to prescribe schedule 3, 4 and 5 medicines without a prescription.

However, the judge said, the Medicines Act carved out an exception to this with authorisation of the Director-General. It was through this that PIMART-accredited pharmacists could apply for permits to prescribe schedule 3 – 5 substances.

The appeal was dismissed with costs.

Certainly not all doctors oppose the idea of pharmacists initiating patients with HIV on treatment: the South African HIV Clinicians Society stated: “We look forward to supporting the rollout of PIMART which will further contribute to South Africa’s HIV response and progress towards the 2030 target of eliminating HIV as a public health concern.”

Republished from GroundUp under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Read the original article.

Categories : Neurodegenerative DiseasesTags :

HIV Drugs May Offer ‘Substantial’ Alzheimer’s Protection

On By ModernMedia
Neurons in the brain of an Alzheimer’s patient, with plaques caused by tau proteins. Credit: NIH

UVA Health scientists are calling for clinical trials testing the potential of HIV drugs called NRTIs to prevent Alzheimer’s disease after discovering that patients taking the drugs are substantially less likely to develop the memory-robbing condition.

The researchers, led by UVA’s Jayakrishna Ambati, MD, previously identified a possible mechanism by which the drugs could prevent Alzheimer’s. That promising finding prompted them to analyse two of the nation’s largest health insurance databases to evaluate Alzheimer’s risk among patients prescribed the medications. In one, the risk of developing Alzheimer’s decreased 6% every year the patients were taking the drugs. In the other, the annual decrease was 13%.

“It’s estimated that over 10 million people around the world develop Alzheimer’s disease annually,” said Ambati, founding director of UVA’s Center for Advanced Vision Science and the DuPont Guerry III Professor in the School of Medicine’s Department of Ophthalmology. “Our results suggest that taking these drugs could prevent approximately 1 million new cases of Alzheimer’s disease every year.”

NRTIs restrain inflammasomes

NRTIs, or nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, are used to prevent the HIV virus from replicating inside the body. But Ambati and his team previously determined that the drugs can also prevent the activation of inflammasomes, important agents of our immune system. These proteins have been implicated in the development of Alzheimer’s disease, so Ambati and his colleagues wanted to see if patients taking the inflammasome-blocking drugs were less likely to develop Alzheimer’s.

To do that, they reviewed 24 years of patient data contained in the U.S. Veterans Health Administration Database – made up heavily of men – and 14 years of data in the MarketScan database of commercially insured patients, which offers a broader representation of the population. They looked for patients who were at least 50 years old and were taking medications for either HIV or hepatitis B, another disease treated with NRTIs. They excluded patients with a previous Alzheimer’s diagnosis.

In total, the researchers identified more than 270 000 patients who met the study criteria and then analysed how many went on to develop Alzheimer’s. Even after adjusting for factors that might cloud the results, such as whether patients had pre-existing medical conditions, the researchers determined that the reduction in risk among patients on NRTIs was “significant and substantial,” they report in a new scientific paper.

The researchers note that patients taking other types of HIV medications did not show the same reduction in Alzheimer’s risk as those on NRTIs. Based on that, they say that NRTIs warrant clinical testing to determine their ability to ward off Alzheimer’s. 

If successful, the benefits could be tremendous, as Alzheimer’s rates are climbing dramatically. Nearly 7 million Americans are living with the disease today, but that number is expected to climb to 13 million by 2050. Further, the estimated annual cost of care for Alzheimer’s and other dementias could rise from $360 billion to almost $1 trillion, the Alzheimer’s Association reports.

“We have also developed a new inflammasome-blocking drug called K9, which is a safer and more effective version of NRTIs,” Ambati said. “This drug is already in clinical trials for other diseases, and we plan to also test K9 in Alzheimer’s disease.”

Source: University of Virginia Health

Categories : HIVTags :

How US Funding Cuts are Forcing Sex Workers to Share HIV Medicines

On By ModernMedia

By Kimberly Mutandiro

Sex workers in Vosloorus, Johannesburg and Springs talked to GroundUp about their struggle to access health services, particularly antiretroviral treatment, since the closures of US funded clinics. Photos: Kimberly Mutandiro

It’s afternoon on Boundary Road in Vosloorus. Sex worker Simangele (not her real name) hopes to secure her next client.

Making enough money to pay rent has always been a concern for Simangele. But now she has a new worry: how to keep up with her antiretroviral treatment.

Two months ago the closure of a mobile clinic — where Simangele and other sex workers in Vosloorus went for checkups and to collect their treatment — left her without access to the life-saving medication.

The mobile clinic was run by the Wits Reproductive Health and HIV Institute (WITS RHI) which heavily relied on US funding. The institute has been providing critical sexual and reproductive health services since 2018. The programme was one of many health facilities forced to halt services at the end of January in the wake of US funding cuts for global aid.

Speaking to GroundUp, Simangele says she ran out of antiretroviral medicines (ARVs) over a month ago and has resorted to borrowing a few tablets from a friend. “I don’t know what I will do because the tablets my friend gets give me side effects,” she says. (Antiretrovirals treat HIV. They have to be taken daily for life.)

She says the clinic closed without any warning or before they could give them transfer letters to public healthcare facilities. She is now dreading having to go to a public facility where she says sex workers are frequently discriminated against, particularly those who are undocumented.

We spoke to a dozen other sex workers in Joburg and in Springs who are worried about defaulting on their antiretroviral treatment following the closure of the Wits RHI clinics. The clinics also provided pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) (to prevent HIV-negative people contracting HIV), and treatments for sexually transmitted infections, TB, sexual reproductive health services, and counselling.

A sex worker shows the last few ARVs she has left.

Another sex worker said, “The minute we go to public clinics, they will need documents, which some of us do not have … Wits made time to listen to our problems as sex workers. Even when we faced challenges with clients, they never judged us.”

Sisi (not her real name), who rents rooms and assists sex workers in Vosloorus, said she’s aware of several sex workers who have defaulted and no longer have access to condoms, lubricants, and treatment for sexually transmitted infections. “The Wits clinic did not discriminate against people without documents and would sometimes provide food, branded T-shirts, caps, and even jobs,” she said.

“Many of us will die”

We visited Zig Zag Road in Springs, where several sex workers said they were out or almost out of ARVs. When asked why they didn’t just go to a local clinic, they told GroundUp about instances where they experienced stigma while trying to access treatment at public clinics.

“I used to receive PrEP to help prevent HIV (from the Wits clinic). We would also receive birth control services. Now I can’t go to a public clinic because we are mocked for being sex workers,” said Siphesihle.

Ntombi, who waits for clients along End Street, attended one of the Wits clinics in Hillbrow which closed down. She said those on PrEP were given transfer letters before the clinic closed.

Other workers nearby told GroundUp that they now pay up to R250 for PrEP, which is more than they can afford.

Sisonke calls for urgent response to crisis

The Sisonke National Movement, which advocates for the rights of sex workers, has been raising the alarm since the closure of US-funded facilities. Before the closures, Sisonke was in talks with National Department of Health through the South African National AIDS Council about the provision of services to sex workers and other vulnerable groups, said the organisation’s spokesperson Yonela Sinqu.

She said that the department never answered activists when they asked what would happen should donor funds no longer be available for these facilities.

She said the plea for assistance without referral letters is made to all provinces, not only Gauteng. However, Gauteng is the only province that has approached us with the crisis of people without referrals, she said.

Department of Health spokesperson Foster Mohale has not responded to requests for comment.

Republished from GroundUp under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Read the original article.

Categories : HIVTags :

SA Unveils Ambitious New HIV Campaign amid Aid Crisis

On By ModernMedia
Photo by Miguel Á. Padriñán: https://www.pexels.com/photo/syringe-and-pills-on-blue-background-3936368/

By Ufrieda Ho

Amid major disruptions caused by aid cuts from the United States government, the health department aims to enrol a record number – an additional 1.1 million – of people living with HIV on life-saving antiretroviral medicine this year. Experts tell Spotlight it can’t be business as usual if this ambitious programme is to have a chance of succeeding.

Government’s new “Close the Gap” campaign launched at the end of February has set a bold target of putting an additional 1.1 million people living with HIV on antiretroviral treatment by the end of 2025.

Around 7.8 million people are living with HIV in the country and of these, 5.9 million are on treatment, according to the National Department of Health. The target is therefore to have a total of seven million people on treatment by the end of the year. Specific targets have also been set for each of the nine provinces.

The initiative is aimed at meeting the UNAIDS 95–95–95 HIV testing, treatment and viral suppression targets that have been endorsed in South Africa’s National Strategic Plan for HIV, TB, and STIs 2023 – 2028. The targets are that by 2030, 95% of people living with HIV should know their HIV status, 95% of people who know their status should be on treatment, and 95% of people on treatment should be virally suppressed (meaning there is so little HIV in their bodily fluids that they are non-infectious).

Currently, South Africa stands at 96–79–94 against these targets, according to the South African National Aids Council (SANAC). This indicates that the biggest gap in the country’s HIV response lies with those who have tested positive but are not on treatment – the second 95 target.

But adding 1.1 million people to South Africa’s HIV treatment programme in just ten months would be unprecedented. The highest number of people who started antiretroviral treatment in a year was the roughly 730 000 in 2011. In each of the last five years, the number has been under 300 000, according to figures from Thembisa, the leading mathematical model of HIV in South Africa. According to our calculations, if South Africa successfully adds 1.1 million people to the HIV treatment programme by the end of 2025, the score on the second target would rise to just above 90%.

The record for the most people starting antiretroviral treatment in a single year was approximately 730 000 in 2011. (Graph by Spotlight, based on Tembisa data.)

The ambitious new campaign launches at a moment of crisis in South Africa’s HIV response. Abrupt funding cuts from the United States government – the PEPFAR funding – has meant that the work of several service-delivery NGOs have ground to a halt in recent weeks.

These NGOs played an important role in getting people tested and in helping find people and supporting them to start and restart treatment. The focus of many of these NGOs was on people in marginalised but high-risk groups, including sex workers, people who use drugs and those in the LGBTQI community. As yet, government has not presented a clear plan for how these specialised services might continue.

“We will need bridging finance for many of these NGOs to contain and preserve the essential work that they were doing till we can confer these roles and responsibilities to others,” says Professor Francois Venter, of the Ezintsha Research Centre at the University of the Witwatersrand.

He says good investment in targeted funding for NGOs is a necessary buffer to minimise “risks to the entire South African HIV programme” and the looming consequences of rising numbers of new HIV cases, more hospitalisations, and inevitably deaths.

Disengaging from care

South Africa’s underperformance on the second 95 target is partly due to people stopping their treatment. The reasons for such disengagement from HIV care can be complex. Research has shown it is linked to factors like frequent relocations, which means people have to restart treatment at different clinics over and over. They also have to navigate an inflexible healthcare system. A systematic review identified factors including mental health challenges, lack of family or social support, long waiting times at clinics, work commitments, and transportation costs.

Venter adds that while people are disengaged from care, they are likely transmitting the virus. The addition of new infections for an already pressured HIV response contributes to South Africa’s sluggish creep forward in meeting the UNAIDS targets.

The health department has not been strong on locating people who have been “lost” to care, says Venter. This role was largely carried out by PEPFAR-supported NGOs that are now unable to continue their work due to the withdrawal of crucial US foreign aid.

Inexpensive interventions

Other experts working in the HIV sector, say the success of the Close the Gap campaign will come down to scrapping programmes and approaches that have not yielded success, using resources more efficiently, strategic investment, and introducing creative interventions to meet the service delivery demands of HIV patients.

Key among these interventions, is to improve levels of professionalism in clinics so patients can trust the clinics enough to restart treatment.

Professor Graeme Meintjes of the Department of Medicine at the University of Cape Town says issues like improving staff attitudes and updating public messaging and communications are inexpensive interventions that can boost “welcome back” programmes.

“The Close the Gap campaign must utilise media platforms and social media platforms to send out a clear message, so people know the risks of disengagement and the importance of returning to care. The longer someone interrupts their treatment and the more times this happens, the more they are at risk of opportunistic infections, severe complications, getting very sick and needing costly hospitalisations,” he says.

Clinics need to provide friendly, professional services that encourage people to return to and stay on treatment, Meintjes says, and services need to be flexible. These could include more external medicine pick-up points, scripts filled for longer periods, later clinic operating hours, and mobile clinic services.

“We need to make services as flexible as possible. People can’t be scolded for missing an appointment – life happens. Putting these interventions in place are not particularly costly, in fact it is good clinical practice and make sense in terms of health economics by avoiding hospitalisations that result from prolonged treatment interruptions,” he says.

The Close the Gap campaign, Meintjes adds, should reassure people that HIV treatment has advanced substantially over the decades. The drugs work well and now have far fewer side effects, with less risk of developing resistance. More patients are stable on the treatment for longer and most adults manage their single tablet once-a-day regime easily.

Insights from our experiences

Professor Linda-Gail Bekker, Chief Executive Officer at the Desmond Tutu Health Foundation, says to get closer to the target of 1.1 million people on treatment by year-end will mean using resources better.

“Additional funding is always welcome, so are new campaigns that catalyse and energise. But we also need to stop doing the things we know don’t have good returns. For instance, testing populations of people who have been tested multiple times and aren’t showing evidence of new infections occurring in those populations,” she says.

There is also a need for better data collection and more strategic use of data, Bekker says. Additionally, she suggests a status-neutral approach, meaning that if someone tests positive, they are referred for treatment, while those who test negative are directed to effective prevention programmes, including access to pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for people at high risk of exposure through sex or injection drug use.

But Bekker adds: “We need to be absolutely clear; these people aren’t going to come to us in our health facilities, or we would have found them already. We have to do the work that many of the PEPFAR-funded NGOs were doing and that is going to the last mile to find the last patient and to bring them to care.”

She says the impact of the PEPFAR funding cuts can therefore not be downplayed. “The job is going to get harder with fewer resources that were specifically directed at solving this problem.”

Venter names another approach that has not worked. This, he says, is the persistence of treating HIV within an integrated health system. Overburdened clinics have simply not coped, he adds, with being able to fulfil the ideal of a “one-stop-shop” model of healthcare.

Citing an example, he says: “Someone might come into a clinic with a stomach ache and be vomiting, they might be treated for that but there’s no investigation or follow-up to find out if it might be HIV-related, for instance. And once that person is out of the door, they’re gone.”

Campaign specifics still lacking

The Department of Health did not answer Spotlight’s questions about funding for the Close the Gap campaign; what specific projects in the campaign will look like; or how clinics and clinic staff will be equipped or supported in order to find the 1.1 million people. There is also scant details of the specifics of the campaign online.

Speaking to the public broadcaster after the 25 February campaign launch, Health Minister Dr Aaron Motsoaledi said South Africa is still seeing 150 000 new infections every year. He said they will reach their 1.1 million target through a province-by-province approach. He used the Eastern Cape as an example.

“When you look at the 1.1 million, it can be scary – it’s quite big. But if you go to the provinces – the Eastern Cape needs to look for 140 000 people. Then you come to their seven districts, that number becomes much less. So, one clinic could be looking for just three people,” he said.

Nelson Dlamini, SANAC’s communications manager, says the focus will be to bring into care 650 000 men, as men are known to have poor health-seeking habits. Added to this will be a focus on adolescents and children who are living with HIV.

He says funding for the Close the Gap campaign will not be shouldered by the health department alone.

“This is a multisectoral campaign. Other departments have a role to play, these include social development, basic education, higher education and training, etc, and civil society themselves,” Dlamini says.

The province-by-province approach to reach the target of finding 1.1 million additional people is guided by new data sources.

“Last year, SANAC launched the SANAC Situation Room, a data hub which pulls data from multiple sources in order for us to have the most accurate picture on the status of the epidemic,” says Dlamini.

These include the Thembisa and Naomi model outputs and data from the District Health Information System and Human Sciences Research Council, he says adding that SANAC is working to secure data sharing agreements with other sectors too.

Dlamini however says the health department, rather than SANAC, will provide progress reports on the 10-month project.

Republished from Spotlight under a Creative Commons licence.

Read the original article.