Tag: Department of Health

Donated mpox Vaccine Stock will be Deployed as Needed, Says Health Dept as Cases Climb to 26

Vaccination for mpox is recommended for people who are at high risk of acquiring the virus and at risk of getting severe disease. (Photo: Unsplash)

By Elri Voigt for Spotlight

Twenty of this year’s 26 confirmed mpox cases came after August, concentrated mostly within the Western Cape. Elri Voigt looks at how the virus has changed and how much of the donated vaccine is left.

The viral illness mpox has caused several clusters of outbreaks across the world. In South Africa, sporadic cases have been detected, but an uptick since August has now brought the illness back into the spotlight.

As of 27 October, 26 mpox cases have been confirmed in South Africa this year, Dr Jacqueline Weyer, Head of the Centre for Emerging Zoonotic and Parasitic Diseases at the National Institute for Communicable Diseases (NICD), told Spotlight.

Of those 26 cases, 18 are in the Western Cape, three are in Gauteng, two are in the Eastern Cape, another two are in the Free State, and one is in KwaZulu-Natal. The majority of cases, 20, have been detected since August this year. All but one of these cases were in men between the ages of 23 and 50 years. One case was in a woman aged 35 to 44.

Seven people have been hospitalised, but no deaths have been reported so far this year.

SA has had a low number of cases overall

Mpox was first identified in humans in 1970, and was mostly observed in central, east and west Africa. The Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) was particularly affected, with thousands of cases reported since 2005.

Then in 2022, the virus spread rapidly to multiple countries for the first time. Around 140 countries have reported mpox cases since 2022, according to the World Health Organization’s mpox dashboard, with over 190 000 laboratory-confirmed cases reported and over 536 deaths to date.

The overall number of mpox cases in South Africa has been low. Our back-of-the-envelope calculation puts the total confirmed number of mpox cases since 2022 at 71. The NICD mpox dashboard lists a total of 66 cases and three deaths between 2024 and 2026. In 2023, according to Weyer, there were no reported cases of mpox in the country. There were five cases of mpox identified in 2022, according to information on the NICD’s page on mpox.

Small outbreaks

While the number of mpox cases have been relatively low to date, the current situation can be referred to as an outbreak.

Weyer told Spotlight an “outbreak” doesn’t necessarily mean a “large number” of people are affected. “Outbreaks may be large, small and confined, and for some conditions, a single case may be denoted as an outbreak.” In public health, she added, an outbreak “refers to the occurrence of cases of a disease in a particular place and period that warrants investigation and a public health response”.

When asked if there is a risk for a larger mpox outbreak in the country, Weyer is cautious.

“We cannot rule out the possibility of further cases, particularly while investigations are ongoing and local transmission has occurred previously,” she said.

“The risk of further spread depends on several factors, including how quickly cases are detected, the number and nature of contacts, the extent of transmission within affected networks, and the effectiveness of public health measures.”

Weyer added: “We have the opportunity to intervene early, identify additional cases and reduce the likelihood of further spread.” She said the NICD’s approach is to remain alert without creating unnecessary alarm. “We are continuing to strengthen surveillance, laboratory investigation, contact tracing, vaccination of eligible priority groups and public awareness,” she said.

The deal with vaccine doses

There is a limited number of donated mpox vaccines available in South Africa. Since there are currently no registered vaccines against mpox or other treatment options in the country, any vaccine or treatment used will need to be supplied via a Section 21 request, which allows for medicines that are not registered in South Africa to be brought in.

Vaccines against smallpox – which is caused by a virus closely related to the mpox virus – can offer some protection against the illness. There are three vaccines that can be used against mpox – LC16m8, MVA-BN and ACAM2000. The latter is only registered for limited use in the United States.

Last year, the Africa Centres for Disease control and Prevention (Africa CDC) donated just over 10 000 doses of the vaccine MVA-BN (known by the brand names imvanex and JYNNEOS) to the National Department of Health. These doses were used in vaccination efforts ever since, with a total of 2 365 doses administered between September 2025 and September 2026, health department spokesperson Foster Mohale told Spotlight.

There are currently 3 865 doses still available for use, according to Mohale, which will expire on 31 August 2027. We asked the health department about the remaining 4 000 or so doses but are still awaiting reply.

When asked whether any additional mpox vaccines will be procured or donated, Mohale said: “Yes, the department is currently reviewing procurement options of additional mpox vaccine doses, dependant on the recommendation from [the] Incident Management Team and the National Advisory Group on Immunisation.”

Mohale said vaccine doses are distributed to provinces as required, depending on “disease outbreak and response”.

Vaccination for mpox is recommended for people who are at high risk of acquiring the virus and at risk of getting severe disease. It can also be considered as a form of post-exposure prophylaxis for people who have been in contact with someone who has mpox.

An antiviral medicine called tecovirimat is occasionally used to treat mpox symptoms in severe cases. There is some limited stock of the drug available for use in South Africa, which Mohale said was sourced through the World Health Organization (WHO) and Africa CDC’s Access and Allocation Mechanism.

There are still more than 40 containers of tecovirimat capsules available, Mohale said. But there are not currently any plans to procure more, although he added that this will be dependent on the recommendation from the Incident Management Team and the National Essential Medicines List Committee. He did not say how many treatment courses are in a container.

In a 2025 National Department of Health mpox guideline document, the National Essential Medicines List Committee suggests that tecovirimat should only be used to treat those with severe disease who have been hospitalised.

This is because the drug has not been shown to make any significant difference in most cases of mpox. Earlier this year, results from a phase 3 study published in the New England Journal of Medicine showed that there was “no evidence that tecovirimat therapy shortened the time to clinical resolution, reduced pain, or increased viral clearance among adults with clade II mpox.”

How the outbreaks have changed since 2022

At first, mpox cases in the country were traced back to international travel. Then in 2024 and 2025 we started seeing local transmission.

Most people diagnosed with mpox in 2024 reported no recent international travel history, Weyer said, noting that “the epidemiological assessment indicated that local person-to-person transmission was occurring”.

For the current situation, Weyer said local transmission is “implied”, noting that investigations are still ongoing.

“This has been established by identifying contact links between cases, and identifying the same clade and sub-lineage of the mpox virus associated with the cases to date.”

There were some individuals who were diagnosed with mpox this year who had recently been out of the country. One of the people had recently travelled to Spain, while another had travelled to Belgium. In two other cases international travellers came to South Africa already carrying the virus.

The clades at play

The mpox virus has two clades, clade I and clade II, with several sub-clades. Professor Tulio de Oliveira, Director of the Centre for Epidemic Response and Innovation at Stellenbosch University, explained to Spotlight previously that clades are a classification system based on the genetic similarities between different strains of a virus.

“So, what it means is that when we see a genetic change [in a virus] that’s really visible and that may have impacted it, normally we call it a different clade or genotype or variant,” he said at the time.

For now, the two mpox sub-clades that are driving most cases in people are sub-clade Ib and sub-clade IIb. This year, cases of mpox in South Africa are a mix of the two sub-clades. The mpox dashboard shows that of the 26 cases, 19 were sub-clade Ib, four were sub-clade IIb, and three cases didn’t have sub-clade information available.

In 2022, sub-clade IIb was driving the mpox outbreak, said Weyer. This changed by 2024 when a new strain of the mpox virus spread beyond the DRC. Sub-clade Ib was first identified in the DRC in 2023 and was behind a large outbreak of the illness in the country that year. This sub-clade spread from the DRC through international travel and cases of sub-clade Ib were reported across the globe by 2024.

The first case of mpox where sequencing indicated sub-clade Ib in South Africa was detected in 2025, according to the NICD dashboard. There was a total of 15 mpox cases reported that year, and sequencing information was available in all but one of the cases.

Weyer said that at the moment there is not any evidence to indicate that there are additional mpox clades or sub-clades circulating in the country.

How mpox is diagnosed and managed

Knowing which clade or sub-clade someone with mpox has doesn’t change how their illness is managed. Instead, it helps scientists track outbreaks.

“Understanding the genetic character of the viruses assists us in tracking outbreaks, evolution of the viruses and identifying markers which may affect diagnostic test performance and potentially vaccine efficacy,” Weyer said.

“The central priorities remain early diagnosis, appropriate clinical care, identifying and monitoring contacts, vaccination of eligible target groups, and communicating accurate information without stigmatising affected individuals or communities. The approach is the same regardless of the current genetic character of these viruses,” she added.

Mpox is mainly spread through close contact with someone who has the virus or contact with material like bedding or clothing that has been in contact with someone with mpox.

The illness can cause flu-like symptoms – like a headache, sore throat, fever and muscle aches – as well as a distinct and often painful rash. The rash can occur on someone’s palms or soles of their feet, face, mouth and throat and sometimes the genital areas. It starts as a flat sore, then becomes a blister which can be itchy or painful. As the rash heals, the lesions dry up, crust over and fall off.

The virus has an incubation period of anything from five to 21 days – but usually it is around seven to 14 days.

“Mpox can affect anyone who has close contact with an infected person. We should avoid assumptions about who can acquire the infection and ensure that people feel able to seek healthcare without fear of judgement or discrimination,” said Weyer.

Mpox is normally diagnosed by swabbing the lesions from the rash and sending that for testing with a PCR (polymerase chain reaction) test that looks for the virus’s DNA.

While the overall case fatality for mpox is low, typically below 1%, people who are immunocompromised (such as people living with uncontrolled HIV), pregnant women, and children, have a much higher risk of severe illness, complications and even death.

In most cases, according to the mpox guideline document, symptoms can be managed at home, with rash-related pain being a particular challenge. Severe mpox cases require hospitalisation.

Someone who has mpox is considered contagious until the rash has completely gone away, and the scabs have healed. Thus, people diagnosed with mpox are advised to self-isolate until their rash has gone away completely.

“People who develop an unexplained rash, particularly when accompanied by fever, swollen lymph nodes or a history of possible exposure, should seek medical assessment,” Weyer advised. “They should avoid close physical contact with others while awaiting clinical guidance and testing. The public should understand that mpox is preventable and that early diagnosis and appropriate care are important in reducing transmission and complications.”

*This article was first published by Spotlight – health journalism in the public interest. Sign up to the Spotlight newsletter.

How to Thaw a Health System Frozen in Fear

Photo by Mulyadi on Unsplash

By Joan van Dyk for Spotlight

South Africa’s public healthcare system finds itself caught between two incomplete revolutions – the democratic dream of a decentralised District Health System, and the march toward National Health Insurance. Health systems experts argue that structural changes won’t save a system that is scared stiff. The most urgent task facing the system, they say, is to help frontline doctors and nurses reimagine what is possible.

Part of what makes an octopus such a nimble, wily creature is that there’s more brain outside its head than in it.

In fact, about two-thirds of an octopus brain is spread across its eight tentacles, each one controlled by a tangle of neurons, its own mini-brain.

These semi-autonomous processing centres allow the octopus to control hundreds of individual suckers, which means tentacles can investigate crevices the eyes can’t see, and even learn from each other without much of the big brain’s help.

The suckers can sample the seafloor and decide whether what it finds is safe to eat, at which point a tentacle turns into a temporary elbow to bring the morsel to its beak.

This is the kind of intelligent and adaptable network that was envisioned for South Africa’s District Health System (DHS).

Where apartheid-era planning demanded top-down compliance, among others to enforce racial oppression and dispossession, the DHS, with its 52 districts and 240 sub-districts, promised to empower staff to respond to patients’ everyday realities, whether they live in a city or a rural village.

In reality, much of the system’s financial and administrative power has pooled at provincial head offices, trapping staff on the ground in the old command-and-control way of doing things.

As a result, frontline healthcare workers clock in every day with the task of executing more than 175 new clinical guidelines (that’s just since 2012) while also racing to meet sometimes out-of-touch performance targets. That is according to 2020 research conducted among district managers in the Eastern Cape, Western Cape, KwaZulu-Natal and Limpopo.

What’s more, layers of red tape added to catch corruption have not deterred politically connected syndicates. Research suggests it has only overwhelmed clinical managers and facility heads who are held accountable for patient experiences but can’t replace even the most basic equipment needed for care, such as a scale, without kicking off a months-long procurement effort.

Under these conditions, health workers have said repeatedly that the work of caring for people gives way to constant administrative self-preservation.

One Eastern Cape manager told researchers: “We will comply now and complain later. If you don’t comply, it means you are failing your district, or your sub-district, or your clinic or your people.”

Much like an octopus might become a danger to itself if it only believes its eyes, the health system’s top-down leadership style is damaging to those it employs and ultimately, to those it serves.

Fear and loathing in the platinum belt

It is possible to bring the original DHS dream to life by shaking the systemic fear out of daily operations.

Leading the charge is SALAD, the South African Learning Alliance for the District Health System.

Established in 2023, SALAD connects academic researchers across several South African universities (including UWC, UCT, NWU, and Stellenbosch) with national, provincial, and district health managers, clinicians, and non-profits to help tackle governance problems.

The team recently completed a pilot project in the North West province’s Rustenburg sub-district with more than 50 managers.

“We started at the sub-district level because if you can strengthen it there, you can learn a lot. There’s much less politics than at the top,” explains Beth Engelbrecht, the former Western Cape health department head and an adjunct professor at NWU and UCT.

Their initial analysis revealed staff were dealing with a mix of helpful and harmful experiences. Mistrust was among the more pervasive issues. “Even in regular meetings, it’s a toxic space,” Engelbrecht says. “If you don’t achieve your target, it’s like a ton of bricks coming down on you.”

To address all this, SALAD teamed up with the North West Systems Leadership Development Programme and the provincial health department to co-design a four-pronged plan.

The executive team got support to transform review meetings into learning spaces, managers attended an accredited short course, and everyone received mentoring, and real-time evaluation.

The most important part of the plan was that all the learning and assessment was happening in sub-district’s wards and daily meetings, using the real problems it faces. Workshops ran in short one or to day blocks spaced over four months, which also minimised disruption to clinic operations.

“When people see the effect of adopting different leadership processes in their relationships with colleagues, that builds its own desire to keep working differently,” explains Lucy Gilson, professor of Health Policy and Systems at UCT.

Unfreezing the frontline

The SALAD team also spent a lot of time coaxing staff out of their panic-stricken state and instead focussing on the power they do have using an adapted version of Stephen Covey’s spheres of control, influence, and concern.

They gave staff explicit permission to stop expending energy on systemic issues (such as national budget cuts) they cannot alter, says Professor Helen Schneider, a professor of public health at UWC.

“Acknowledge the system-wide issues, but don’t kill yourself worrying about them,” she explains, “focus on what you can do, and then suddenly people discover a certain kind of agency, and they recognise they do have power.”

For instance, managers and clinicians can directly control in their immediate daily operations, how facility meetings are structured, staff schedules, internal communication tone, queue management, and creating psychological safety within their immediate team.

Outside their own facility, they can build strategic alliances, Schneider says, by navigating local trade union relations or engaging clinic committees, negotiating with sub-district support units, or coordinating across public-private boundaries.

The pilot is complete, and the SALAD team is still in touch with health authorities in the North West to figure out how to scale the programme.

This will take time, Gilson says, because leadership development is not written into provincial annual performance plans. Although it’s a frontline change that’s needed, backing from the top is still crucial.

Engelbrecht and Gilson met with a number of national oversight bodies (including the Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation, the Department of Public Service and Administration, and the National Department of Health) to figure out how leadership was being managed on a national level.

“All three of those national bodies said leadership is critical, but all of them confirmed that leadership development is nowhere in any plan an explicit, funded priority.”

Unlike most other national or provincial departments, the Western Cape has embedded leadership development into its structures, budgets and working practices.

Through the Partnership for Health Leadership and Management Capacity Development (PAHLM), for instance, the Western Cape health department and three universities developed a leadership competency framework and a leadership behaviours charter. The framework was tested and developed through two rounds of workshops involving more than 800 public health-system managers and was commissioned and approved by the provincial health department.

The case of the disappearing paramedic examiners

Years of fear and resentment can crystallise in unexpected ways.

In KwaZulu-Natal, a meticulously planned paramedic examination was nearly derailed when a number of paramedic educators and examiners booked off sick at the same time, Caleb Wang tells those gathered for a SALAD online seminar.

Wang, who coordinates in-service training for clinical employees in KZN, is a paramedic by training. Paramedics are an important link connecting household emergencies, clinics, and district hospitals, though training colleges are often regional or provincial facilities.

These assessments are labour intensive, Wang says, and they require large panels of examiners for clinical skills, oral boards, and simulation exercises. It’s a high-stakes situation for students too, since failing means they can’t progress, get promoted or qualify for salary increases.

The exams continued with fewer examiners for the sake of the students, but the sudden changes created a high-pressure environment for everyone involved.

At first, Wang and his colleagues suspected a stomach bug might be behind the chaos, but upon closer inspection, a stranger reality emerged; the examiners were afraid to attend the assessment, and afraid of saying why.

As it turned out, course coordinators leading the different academic tracks were locked in interpersonal feuds. Educators felt helping to assess a rival coordinator’s exam could be seen as a betrayal. Unsure of how to raise such worries without also facing reprisals, people instead took sick leave in self-defence.

Such a fraught emotional landscape can’t be fixed with rules and reprimands. Though managers started to track sick leave application trends for signs of a coming crisis, the underlying issues could only be remedied using a more collaborative, relational style of leadership.

Wang focussed directly on the relationships between co-ordinators. After they had completed a series of communication exercises, management also instituted regular meetings where structured, open dialogue was encouraged.

Topics previously taboo in administrative settings (feelings, assumptions, perceptions, and hidden dynamics) were reframed as important operational intel.

The formerly warring co-ordinators aren’t personal friends today, Wang says, but the approach succeeded in breaking down the seemingly intractable silos and has restored cooperation across the different academic components.

These days, paramedic examinations go off without a hitch.

Psychologically safe doctors = physically safe patients

People who have the confidence to speak up, admit mistakes, or take calculated clinical risks are much better at saving lives and preventing hospital infections than those who keep their head down out of fear.

Nomlindo Makubalo, a paediatrician in an Eastern Cape district clinical specialist team, has seen this first-hand.

Speaking during a webinar on psychological safety in the DHS, she shares an anonymised story of a junior medical officer and ward nurses at a cash-strapped district hospital who were confronted with a critically ill, ventilated 11-month-old infant.

The baby urgently needed intensive care but there were no available ICU beds in the regional or central referral complexes. The rural ward nurses had no formal ICU ventilation training.

In a traditional, fear-based culture, the local team might have panicked and passed responsibility upward or allowed the infant to deteriorate while waiting for official transport sign-off.

But Makubalo and the district clinical specialist team had intentionally built a relationship of psychological safety, so the junior doctor felt safe to call her directly.

She reassured the team and provided real-time, telephonic clinical supervision for two consecutive nights.

The hospital management authorised additional nursing support to relieve ward strain. Supported by this protective leadership umbrella, the frontline team safely ventilated the infant locally for 48 hours until an ICU bed opened.

The baby was transferred and made a complete recovery.

Makubalo says: “Psychological safety and trust translate directly into quality care. When people know you have their back, they will do everything to save a life.”

The physics of success versus failure

In the Western Cape, the provincial government explicitly measures the energy all civil servants expend that never reaches the public.

In a healthcare setting, patients might lose out because health workers’ energy is spent navigating internal friction, administrative hierarchies and coping with interpersonal conflict.

The technical term used across the province is “organisational entropy”. Very loosely related to the scientific concept of entropy, it measures the percentage of total energy within an institution consumed by unproductive work.

In the proprietary tool used by the Western Cape government, called The Barrett Model®, wasted energy is measured using a survey. It offers a list of personal and organisational values and asks staff to choose 10 personal values, 10 values that describe the current culture of the organisation, and 10 organisational values they’d like to see in the future.

The cultural entropy score comes from the percentage of current organisational values staff pick that the Barrett Model classifies as “limiting,” such as conflict, friction, and frustration.

At the Retreat Community Health Centre, a facility that provides 24-hour emergency and maternity care in Cape Town, researchers found staff operated in a pervasive climate of fear. Their baseline survey suggested that staff viewed management as administrative police designed to catch staff making mistakes, and as a result, communication broke down into departmental silos.

To break this cycle, the facility embarked on an 18-month participatory action research initiative.

The three key facility leaders, the facility manager, family physician, and nursing manager underwent leadership assessments and six months of individual coaching. They engaged in weekly reflective learning sets, mapping out communication flows, and examining how their own management behaviours generated fear.

The results were transformative.

When researchers followed up 18 months later, limiting values had dropped out of the top 10 current organisational values, although they still represented 13% of all values selected (down from 33%). In their place emerged positive, unifying values: caring, open communication, teamwork, respect, fairness, and accountability.

This phenomenon is not confined to isolated research sites. The Western Cape Department of Health and Wellness formally tracked cultural entropy across its entire workforce as an official performance metric, achieving a department-wide entropy reduction from 23% to 20.9% between 2013 and 2016.

This systematic drop in friction directly correlated with improved employee retention, stronger teamwork, and smoother service delivery across health districts.

The latest annual report puts cultural entropy cross the provincial public health system at 16%.

The province also tracks leadership skills on an individual, team, and system level.

Tendani Mabuda, who leads the provincial health department’s People’s Development team, argues the proof of the value of strong leadership can be found in the department’s eight year run of consecutive unqualified audits.

“Leadership development cannot alone resolve structural failures or challenges, but it enables managers to be agile and cope with the environment they are facing,” he says.

‘Trust is not a luxury’

For three decades, the unwritten rule within South Africa’s public sector clinics and hospitals has been to hide errors, follow flawed directives to the letter, and brace for new instructions from headquarters.

Stamping out this culture of fear in favour of psychological safety will be crucial to the success of South Africa’s next big healthcare revolution, the National Health Insurance (NHI)  scheme.

The scheme, which currently faces about a dozen legal challenges, will change the way resources and healthcare services are pooled and purchased.

At the moment, most provincial health funding comes from nationally raised revenue transferred by National Treasury to provincial governments. The amount each province gets is determined by the provincial equitable share equation. The formula determines each province’s share using factors such as population, poverty and demand for health and education services. Provincial governments then decide how much of their budgets to allocate to their health departments. Separately, the national health department administers conditional grants for specified health services and programmes.

Under the proposed new system, funding would shift from this passive approach, where facilities receive budgets shaped by previous allocations to cover costs such as salaries and supplies, to strategic purchasing.

This means actively deciding which services a population needs, which providers should deliver them and how to pay those providers, with funding decisions guided by health needs and provider performance rather than simply historical spending.

For primary healthcare, contracting units would organise networks of public clinics, district hospitals and participating private providers to serve people within a sub-district, with the NHI Fund purchasing services through these arrangements.

These are hardware updates but, as multiple governance studies have shown, a hardware solution won’t fix a software problem.

And strategic purchasing will require sophisticated cultural software and strong leadership from district and sub-district managers with the ability to build trust, negotiate, manage networks that combine public primary care clinics, district hospitals, private doctors, nonprofits, and municipal health services.

At the heart of all of this, is trust between people, explained health economics professor Susan Cleary during a June webinar.

“You don’t get good quality results if you don’t have good quality relationships, they’re part of performance, and trust is not a luxury.”

Incidentally, an octopus can overcome incredible barriers once it decides to seek safety.

In 2016, staff at the Napier Aquarium in New Zealand arrived at work to find that Inky, one of its star inhabitants, had escaped. Finding the glass lid of his tank left slightly ajar after routine maintenance, he slipped out overnight, navigated a 50-metre drainpipe, and disappeared into the sea.

*This article was first published by Spotlight – health journalism in the public interest. Sign up to the Spotlight newsletter.

Can SA’s New Director-General for Health Turn Around a Struggling Department?

Dr Thembisile Xulu is the newly-appointed Director General of the National Department of Health. (Photo: Denvor de Wee/Spotlight)

By Marcus Low

Dr Thembisile Xulu is South Africa’s sixth permanent Director-General of health since the dawn of democracy. How will she measure up against her predecessors?

In recent months, we’ve been keeping an especially close eye on the media statements following the twice-monthly meetings of South Africa’s cabinet. Then last week, we finally spotted the line we had been waiting for – the announcement of South Africa’s new Director-General (DG) for Health. 

The name of the country’s sixth permanent DG since 1994 was a familiar one. Back in 2020, Spotlight interviewed Dr Thembisile Xulu when she was appointed CEO of the South African National AIDS Council (SANAC) – the national body established by Cabinet to coordinate South Africa’s response to HIV, Tuberculosis, and Sexually Transmitted Infections. 

In moving from the job of SANAC CEO to health DG, Xulu follows in the footsteps of Dr Sandile Buthelezi, who was CEO of SANAC from 2017 to 2020 and DG for Health from 2020 to early 2026, when he was suspended along with two other senior officials in the department. 

Prior to her time at SANAC, Xulu worked at the non-profit Right to Care for around a decade and a half. She is a medical doctor and has a master’s degree in public health. As far as we can tell, she is well liked in healthcare circles.

A huge task

The job facing Xulu is a daunting one. 

First, she will have to sort out problems within the department itself. As we pointed out in an editorial published in April, the department hasn’t gotten a clean audit in any of the last five years. The Digital Vibes scandal and the suspension of several senior officials earlier this year relating to another matter paints a bleak picture. While we know there are several committed and capable people working in the department, organisationally it seems to be exhibiting all the classic signs of chronic dysfunction and a lack of effective leadership. 

Maybe the most urgent task facing Xulu then is simply to turn the health department into a more professional organisation. This will require strong leadership and management skills, but it will also require her to more effectively protect the department from whatever the political whims of the day may be. Ultimately, a DG that always says, “yes Minister”, isn’t actually doing the Minister, or the public, any favours. 

But it won’t be easy. When the DG job was advertised back in March, the advert did not open by referencing the Constitution or the National Health Act, as one might expect, but by stating that the DG will be responsible for implementing the Presidential Social Compact for transformation of the health sector. The last health compact, signed in 2024, was a controversial document that did not get buy-in from several key business and healthcare worker organisations. That the job advert starts by referencing the compact rather than the relevant laws, seems an ominous sign for the DG’s chances of building a more capable, less politicised, department. 

Second, getting the department’s house in better order will help with what is of course Xulu’s main job – helping to address the country’s many health challenges. Top of the list is the chronic shortages of healthcare workers in the public sector. We have seen an important policy document and some extra funds for healthcare workers, but the incisive leadership and sustained commitment and planning needed to really get on top of the problem has been absent. 

There is a worrying pattern whereby government looks into a problem, maybe a committee of some sort is set up, the intentions are all good, but then everything stalls once some implementation challenge or political complication arises. We need a DG who does not allow important health issues to drift in this way, but who has the focus and determination to find workable solutions and to see them through. 

And then there is NHI

The NHI Act might currently be tangled up in a thicket of litigation, but whatever happens in the courts, NHI will be a big part of the DG’s work in the coming years (DGs are appointed for five years at a time). This may take the form of implementing some elements of the current NHI Act, or working with a revised Act, we just don’t know at this stage. 

But there will be many other bread and butter issues besides NHI demanding Xulu’s attention. In our analysis, the department has badly dropped the ball on urgent issues such as healthcare worker shortages, the regulation of private healthcare, and improving the quality of public healthcare services in areas such as mental health, diabetes, and hypertension. Hopefully under the new DG, the department will find ways of better addressing these issues in parallel with its work on NHI. 

A chance at renewal

There is some reason for optimism. With the appointment of Xulu as DG, and that of Dr Nonhlanhla Ndlovu before that as the department’s HIV czar, new people are now in two of the most important positions in the department. Such leadership changes offer a unique opportunity for organisational renewal. 

Spotlight has requested an interview with Xulu and we hope to get some time with her once she’s been in the job for a few weeks. We will ask her the tough questions, but we will also be fair and give her time. After all, we all want to see a health department and a health system that works. 

– Low is editor of Spotlight

This article was first published by Spotlight – health journalism in the public interest. Sign up to the Spotlight newsletter.

A Double Roadblock to NHI Implementation

The National Health Insurance (NHI) Act On Friday (20 February), it was reported that President Cyril Ramaphosa had put a halt on putting the NHI Act into effect, amid an array of legal challenges. Four days later, the Pretoria High Court granted an order to the same effect.

The NHI has probably been the most contentious piece of legislation passed in South Africa, and the developments since it was signed into law have been coming thick and fast. The promulgation, that is, putting the law into effect, of the NHI was long predicted to be the hardest part of getting this attempt at universal healthcare to work.

This latest court order restrains President Ramaphosa from any further work in promulgating the NHI Act – something which he had already announced he would do just a few days ago, as reported by BusinessTech. This represents something of a pause in the ongoing legal maelstrom – nothing can be decided until the court cases clear, according to an attorney’s statement on behalf of the President.

Almost as soon as the NHI was signed into law, an array of unions, hospitals, professional organisations and even the Western Cape government launched legal challenges. A ruling compelled the President to provide the records of his decision to sign the NHI into law. One key part governing where healthcare professionals could practice has already been struck down as unconstitutional by a July 2025 High Court ruling.

The lobby group AfriForum last week entered the fray with multiple challenges to the NHI’s constitutionality, aiming to force the government to scrap the NHI completely. A few days later, President Ramaphosa paused the NHI’s promulgation. This all came amidst discussion by the Department of Health into phasing out medical aid tax credits to begin the NHI Fund – which would squeeze many middle-class families out of being able to afford private healthcare. (For now at least, there is good news – just as QuickNews was typing this, it was announced that medical aid tax credits would be increased for 2026).

Experts and even the government itself have acknowledged that these legal challenges will further delay the already decades-long implementation of the NHI, and it appears that this has come to pass. Whether the NHI is modified to a workable version along the lines suggested by industry experts, or whether it is scrapped entirely and South Africa remains stuck with its deeply unequal public/private sector divide remains to be seen.

What is certain is that the NHI as originally envisioned simply isn’t affordable for South Africa – or even a wealthy developed country. The National Treasury seems to be aware of this, as suggested by its minimal allocations to the NHI Fund and medical aid tax credits being updated for this year’s budget.

A Lament for South African Healthcare: There Is Another Way

By Dr Dumisani Bomela, Chief Executive Officer of the Hospital Association of South Africa

There’s an old African idiom: “When elephants fight, the grass suffers.” The “elephants”, however, are two interdependent players in healthcare: the government, which is pushing for the National Health Insurance (NHI), and private healthcare providers and funders, who have long raised serious concerns about the initiative.

At the heart of the dispute is whether a single-fund NHI is constitutional, viable, and sustainable. The legal conflict is shaping up to be unlike anything we have seen in this country.

Dr Dumisani Bomela, CEO of HASA

Some legislators argue that the private healthcare sector opposes reform because it is driven by profit and harbours anti-poor sentiments. But no one in the private healthcare sector is opposed to the objectives of the National Health Insurance. We are in favour of healthcare reform that works. There is a crucial difference.

It is a difference dismissed by those determined that only their view matters. The result is that not only has the country spent nearly two decades in a fruitless debate about the NHI, but it appears that those in charge of the healthcare system have prioritised stagnation over progress. When alternatives could have been explored, expert advice considered, research examined, and insights heard, none were.

Instead, constructive dialogue leading to a positive compromise benefiting patients is perceived as a weakness to be denied and overcome. Perspectives have become so entrenched that mutual understanding seems out of reach. Consequently, energy, effort, and resources will be spent in courts rather than on designing solutions.

Meanwhile, the country’s healthcare users are not getting the attention they deserve. South Africans continue to suffer in under-resourced facilities or struggle to afford medical coverage.

Current legislation and regulation already allow for immediate reforms that could lower healthcare costs and ease pressure on the system and public hospitals. We could complete the reform pathway that would support the affordability of medical aid for millions more South Africans, a move that experts and the Health Market Inquiry have recommended.

Through public–private collaboration and innovation, we can upgrade healthcare infrastructure and develop a stronger base of critical healthcare skills, particularly in nursing, ultimately creating jobs and strengthening the national fiscus. These are realistic and achievable solutions that would deliver real progress in the short term and better position us to move more confidently towards universal healthcare coverage.

Our greatest achievement as a nation has been our ability to unite in times of crisis. We can do it again, but only if all role players are meaningfully involved in healthcare reform – including the private sector – and are willing to listen, consider, and compromise with each other to meet the needs of all healthcare users. To begin with, the government must view private healthcare as a strategic partner, a national asset that can offer significant ideas to resolve the national health delivery crisis. Private healthcare, on the other hand, faces challenges, some of which were identified in the Health Market Inquiry, and others that will undoubtedly be raised in the roundtable debates accompanying the collaborative initiatives crucial to strengthening the system.

If we don’t change course, patients waiting in overcrowded facilities will continue to suffer, and families will continue to struggle to afford care. Dedicated doctors and nurses already working under increasingly difficult conditions will face a darkening future, and the entire system will creak more ominously.

The path to reform does not have to be adversarial. We can redesign healthcare together, combining the strengths of both public and private sectors in the spirit of recognising our shared humanity and interdependence. We can still choose collaboration over confrontation, practical solutions over political battles, and progress over passivity.

But we must act now. Time is running out, and every day spent fighting in courtrooms rather than sitting eye to eye and exchanging ideas is another day that South Africans suffer without the healthcare they deserve. The choice is ours: Will we fight each other, or will we fight together for a healthcare system that serves everyone?

Government Announces 1200 New Doctor Positions – But Nursing Loses out

In a move that will come as a relief for the hundreds of unemployed doctors currently seeking positions within public healthcare, the Department of Health has announced the creation of 1650 new positions for healthcare professionals. The move includes 1200 new positions for doctors – but only 200 for nurses.

Health Minister Dr Aaron Motsoaledi made the announcement at a media briefing on Thursday 10 April.

“We believe we’re in a position to announce today that the council has approved the advertisement of 1200 jobs for doctors, 200 for nurses and 250 for other healthcare professionals,” Motsoaledi stated. This would come with a cost of R1.78 billion – out of a healthcare budget that has not risen in line with inflation.

Jobless doctors picketed earlier this year as more than 1800 were left in limbo without positions – the true number is likely higher. The South African Medical Association (SAMA) had sent an urgent letter to President Cyril Ramaphosa, warning that if the problem was not addressed, doctors would leave for the private sector or emigrate, leading to the collapse of the public healthcare sector.

The road to specialisation had also been made more challenging by the shortage of positions, with junior doctors have been taking unpaid roles. Such unpaid work does not count toward the registrar component of specialisation and largely only serves to bump up the doctor’s CV by, for example, enabling them to apply for diplomas. Hiring freezes also saw GPs unable to move into government positions, and the limited number of registrar positions has also by some accounts become a bottleneck, with no additional registrar positions added for the past 10–15 years.

Regarding the loss of US funding for HIV programmes, he said that there was a buffer of stock for ARVS, and that “no person needing ARVs would lack” those drugs.

But the small number of new nurse positions was not well received. The Democratic Nursing Organisation of South Africa (DENOSA) was particularly unimpressed given the pressure on overburdened nurses.

DENOSA spokesperson Sonia Mabunda-Kaziboni said, “In the face of a nationwide crisis of nurse shortages, this announcement is not only shockingly inadequate but downright insulting to the nursing fraternity.”

Calling it a “slap in the face”, she continued: “The shortage of nurses in South Africa is nothing short of a devastating crisis. The Free State alone faces a 28% vacancy rate, and similar figures are reflected in other provinces such as the Eastern Cape. National projections estimate that South Africa could be short by over 100 000 nurses by 2030 if urgent interventions are not made.”

DENOSA plans to “name and shame” institutions that have become “dangerous to communities” as a result of unresolved poor conditions.

My Five-hour Wait for Treatment at Mamelodi Hospital

Gauteng Health MEC has said Mamelodi Regional Hospital meets National Health Insurance standards, but my experience was not good

The writer waited five hours for treatment for a broken wrist and head injuries at Mamelodi Regional Hospital in Tshwane. Photo: Warren Mabona.

By Warren Mabona

I waited five hours to get medical treatment at Mamelodi Regional Hospital in Tshwane, with a broken wrist and an injured head.

On 19 February 2025 at about 4pm I was walking in Mamelodi West. I was on a journalism assignment, heading to informal settlements that are prone to flooding.

The street was quiet, but I felt safe because I had walked there before. Suddenly, a car stopped in front of me, and two men got out of it and tried to rob me. I ran away and jumped into the stormwater passage, but slipped and fell, hitting my face against the concrete.

When I managed to stand up, I was dizzy and my vision was blurred. I was drenched in dirty water and my belongings — my cell phone, my wallet and my camera bag — were wet.

The men who attacked me were no longer on the street. My right wrist was swollen and painful, an injury above my eye was bleeding profusely, and my head was aching. But I was relieved that I was still alive and I still had all my belongings.

I decided not to call an ambulance, but to walk about 800 metres to Mamelodi Regional Hospital.

I went to the casualty unit, expecting that I would receive treatment quickly. At the front desk, a clerk took more than 20 minutes to fill in my file. He said the hospital’s computer system was offline and he had to fill in the file with a pen. I then went to sit at the reception area. My head was aching and I repeatedly requested headache tablets from the nurses, who gave me two tablets after 30 minutes. But my pain lingered.

The wound on my face was still bleeding and my wrist was swollen and bent. About 40 minutes after my arrival, a nurse cleaned my wound and wrapped it with a bandage, stopping the bleeding.

At about 8pm, a man sitting next to me said he had arrived at the hospital at 2pm after falling from scaffolding at a construction site. He was still waiting for his X-ray results.

I went for X-rays and long afterwards, at about 10pm, I had a cast put on my wrist. I was given injections which helped with the pain. I was discharged at 11pm and went home.

In September last year, the Gauteng MEC for Health Nomantu Nkomo-Ralehoko said that Mamelodi Regional Hospital was the first hospital in Gauteng ready to meet National Health Insurance (NHI) standards.

In response to GroundUp’s questions, Gauteng Department of Health spokesperson Motalatale Modiba said a triage priority system is followed at the hospital, meaning that four patients with critical wounds that required life-saving emergencies were attended to first. He said this affected my waiting time for wound care and the application of a cast.

“You were classified as Orange P2, that is a person who is in a stable condition and is not in any immediate danger, but requires observation,” said Modiba.

“At the time of your arrival, the casualty unit had 31 other patients to be seen. These include four critical cases in the resuscitation unit, ten trauma cases, 16 medical cases and four pediatric cases,” he said.

Modiba confirmed that the hospital’s computer system was offline when I arrived.

I asked Modiba whether the Gauteng Department of Health can still confidently regard this hospital as NHI-ready despite the slow delivery of medical services I experienced. Modiba said: “Mamelodi Regional Hospital remains committed to provide best healthcare services.”

Republished from GroundUp under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Read the original article.

Nomantu Nkomo-Ralehoko’s Comeback as Gauteng MEC for Health Sparks Mixed Reactions

Nomantu Nkomo-Ralehoko is sworn in by Judge Lebogang Modiba as the new MEC for Health. (Photo: Gauteng Provincial Government)

By Ufrieda Ho

ANC support in Gauteng dipped below 40% in the recent provincial elections and an ANC-led minority government is now at the helm. Among those in Premier Panyaza Lesufi’s new Cabinet is Nomantu Nkomo-Ralehoko who’s been reappointed as MEC for Health and Wellness.

Nomantu Nkomo-Ralehoko was first appointed Gauteng’s MEC for Health and Wellness in October 2022. A long-time ANC member, she previously served as MEC for Finance and e-Government and has been a member of the provincial legislature since 1999.

She returns to the critical role at a time when the province’s health department, based on extensive reporting by Spotlight and other publications,  remains mired in a chronic cycle of administrative and service delivery dysfunction.

At just under R65 billion for the current financial year, the department gets a massive slice of the Gauteng budget. While the National Department of Health leads on health policy, the day-to-day running of public healthcare services is managed by provincial departments of health.

The Gauteng health department has a high number of vacancies. On the administrative side this includes the critical position of a chief financial officer (CFO). The previous CFO, Lerato Madyo, was suspended in August 2022. Her case is still to be concluded. Research conducted last year by community healthcare monitoring group Ritshidze found that the majority of healthcare facility staff and public healthcare users that they surveyed felt that healthcare facilities were understaffed.

Madyo’s case is connected to ongoing investigations into corruption at Tembisa Hospital undertaken by the Special Investigating Unit. This was also the issue that whistle-blower Babita Deokaran was investigating before she was assassinated in August 2021. Deokaran was acting chief finance director before she was killed. Since her death it’s been confirmed that there was corrupt spending to the tune of R1bn at Tembisa Hospital.

When Nkomo-Ralehoko answered 10 questions from Spotlight shortly after her appointment in 2022, she said: “One of my immediate focus areas is to ensure that the department’s systems across delivery areas such as Finance, Human Resources, Monitoring and Evaluation, Risk Management, etc. are strengthened so that processes are not dependent on human vulnerability but there are clear checks and balances. An environment that has no consequence management breeds ill-discipline and a culture of ignoring processes and procedures as prescribed in our legislative framework.”

Gauteng also faces mounting surgery and oncology treatment backlogs. Its clunky supply chains and procurement systems have often left suppliers unpaid and facilities struggling without basic medical consumables as well as not being able to procure large pieces of equipment when it’s been needed. Some hospitals have had periods when patients have had to go without food.

There remains questions about governance capacity in the department. Notable examples from Nkomo-Ralehoko’s tenure so far include inaction over utilising a March 2023 Gauteng Treasury allocation of R784 million for outsourcing radiation oncology services. These ring-fenced funds were secured following sustained pressure and protests by activists and civil society. To date, this money has still not been spent.

https://platform.twitter.com/embed/Tweet.html?creatorScreenName=SpotlightNSP&dnt=false&embedId=twitter-widget-1&features=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%3D%3D&frame=false&hideCard=false&hideThread=false&id=1783790046073520568&lang=en&origin=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.spotlightnsp.co.za%2F2024%2F07%2F08%2Fnomantu-nkomo-ralehokos-comeback-as-gauteng-mec-for-health-sparks-mixed-reactions%2F&sessionId=0cf4a9233d69e0418da0c0880c4ca69b12ddb0e2&siteScreenName=SpotlightNSP&theme=dark&widgetsVersion=2615f7e52b7e0%3A1702314776716&width=550px

The department is also still to implement a June 2022 memorandum of agreement with the University of Witwatersrand. The agreement sets a framework for the department and the university to mutually address many of the health sector challenges in the province, while ensuring the academic training of the next generation of doctors takes place.

Another key challenge for Nkomo-Ralehoko will be how to navigate a changed Gauteng Provincial Legislature in this seventh administration. There is no outright majority and there is no unity government deal that includes the largest opposition party, the Democratic Alliance (DA). This will represent distinct hurdles for passing budgets or garnering enough votes for approvals in the house.

Despite these challenges, the reappointment of 58-year-old Nkomo-Ralehoko is being welcomed by some. They say that she brings stability to a portfolio that has been plagued by shaky, short-lived tenures in the top role. They say she has a flexible leadership style, and that she is open to working with many different stakeholders. But her critics charge that she cannot deliver the overhaul that the department needs and that she has not been tough enough on corruption.

‘More of the same’

Jack Bloom is the DA shadow minister for health in Gauteng. He says: “I don’t think the present MEC deserves to be reappointed, but that’s for the ruling party to determine. What we will get going forward is more of the same. The Gauteng Department of Health needs wholesale change but it’s not going to happen under the present situation.”

Bloom says Nkomo-Ralehoko’s comeback is “cadre deployment and political protection” and he adds: “I’m afraid that the corruption is across the board and the looting is going to continue.”

https://platform.twitter.com/embed/Tweet.html?creatorScreenName=SpotlightNSP&dnt=false&embedId=twitter-widget-2&features=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%3D%3D&frame=false&hideCard=false&hideThread=false&id=1808599071910691314&lang=en&origin=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.spotlightnsp.co.za%2F2024%2F07%2F08%2Fnomantu-nkomo-ralehokos-comeback-as-gauteng-mec-for-health-sparks-mixed-reactions%2F&sessionId=0cf4a9233d69e0418da0c0880c4ca69b12ddb0e2&siteScreenName=SpotlightNSP&theme=dark&widgetsVersion=2615f7e52b7e0%3A1702314776716&width=550px

He says the MEC slow-walked disciplinary action on many suspended senior staffers and has also failed to tighten up on the likes of pre-employment checks on would-be employees, resulting, he says, in weak candidates being appointed.

The EFF is the third largest party in the Gauteng legislature. Nkululeko Dunga was contacted to weigh in on Nkomo-Ralehoko’s reappointment but he declined to take our calls and didn’t respond to written questions.

‘Delays that cost lives’

Speaking briefly to news channel eNCA after she signed her oath of office on 3 July, Nkomo-Ralehoko mentioned oncology and radiation services as one of her priority areas. She referred specifically to the building of bunker-like facilities in order to house specialist cancer treatment equipment procured for Chris Hani Baragwanath Hospital and George Mukhari Hospital.

However, for Salome Meyer of the Cancer Alliance, the fact that equipment has been procured but is sitting in storage amounts to delays that cost lives. She says there are currently 3 000 patients in the province on waiting lists for cancer treatment.

“Our facilities are operational but they aren’t operating at full capacity because the  equipment is not in use or we don’t have  staff to operate the equipment,” Meyer says.

“What we’re seeing is resignation after resignation of radiation therapists because they aren’t on the correct pay grade. So even when we do get equipment there is not enough people to operate the equipment.

“The MEC has to start looking after her own people – the people who work in our clinics and hospitals,” she says.

‘Ensuring stability’

For the Democratic Nursing Organisation of South Africa (Denosa) in Gauteng though, Nkomo-Ralehoko has used her 20 months in the MEC role so far to start making the right turnarounds for the health department.

Bongani Mazibuko of the nursing association says: “We believe that this welcome appointment of the MEC will go a long way in ensuring that there’s stability in the department and it’s something that Denosa has long been calling for”.

Lack of stability has been a feature of Gauteng health over the last decade or so. When Nkomo-Ralehoko was appointed in 2022, she replaced Nomathemba Mokgethi, who had been in the job for less than two years. Prior to Mokgethi, Bandile Masuku was also in the position for less than two years. Gwen Ramokgopa filled in for a bit more than two years, and before her, Qedani Mahlangu was forced to resign after the Life Esidemeni tragedy.

Denosa in Gauteng also call for the finalisation of CEO appointments and for senior management posts to be filled. They also say fixing of infrastructure is critical “so that the department can be more functional”.

Mazibuko adds: “We need to ensure that appointment of nurses is prioritised as they are the backbone of the system. But we have faith that we can continue working together to ensure that the people of Gauteng get the health that they deserve.”

Right direction, but needs to act on corruption

Treatment Action Campaign Gauteng chairperson Monwabisi Mbasa also supports Nkomo-Ralehoko’s reappointment. He says compared to her predecessors, Nkomo-Ralehoko has so far been someone they feel they can work with.

“We have seen that in the past nearly two years the MEC has been trying to address some issues plaguing public healthcare at provincial, district and clinic level. She is hands-on and flexible, so we have confidence in her still,” Mbasa says.

But Mbasa says she must be held to account on not taking “drastic action against corruption”. He says 26 of Gauteng’s 37 public hospitals have in recent times run out of food but Nkomo-Ralehoko’s intervention included using suppliers and service providers who were not properly registered. He says it is a red flag and they will continue to hold the MEC to account.

Mbasa says to move forward now for health in the province will require alignment of the health department with the departments of infrastructure and development and of finance.

“Infrastructure of our health facilities is an emergency. We are also calling for the improvement of supply chain management and procurement of goods and services and we need to improve human resources.

“There are challenges and weakness in the Cabinet but it’s good that we are not working with completely new people in these portfolios. This is the time to accelerate and to ensure that we use the seventh administration to improve the delivery of public health,” Mbasa says.

After long and tense talks, negotiations with the DA to form part of the provincial executive deadlocked. This resulted in Premier Panyaza Lesufi naming a Cabinet with seven MEC positions for the ANC and one each to the PA, IFP and Rise Mzansi.

Republished from Spotlight under a Creative Commons licence.

Read the original article here

Motsoaledi’s Return could Work, but he Needs a DG who can Say “No Minister”

By Marcus Low

In some respects, Dr Aaron Motsoaledi was the right person for the job when he was appointed as South Africa’s Minister of Health in 2009. But in 2024, the healthcare context in the country looks very different. Spotlight editor Marcus Low asks what we might expect from this new chapter with Motsoaledi in the top health job.

When Dr Aaron Motsoaledi first became South Africa’s Minister of Health in 2009, the number one task in front of him was clear. He had to rapidly expand the country’s HIV testing and treatment programme.

Over the next decade, he did exactly that. When he left the health portfolio in 2019, there were around 5.1 million people on HIV treatment in the country – roughly six times the 850 000 there were in 2009. Driven largely by this expansion in the HIV treatment programme, life expectancy in the country increased from 58.4 years when he started to 64.9 when he left.

But while Motsoaledi largely succeeded on HIV and tuberculosis, there was a sense that he was not a details man and struggled to see through important health system reforms. He never got on top of fundamental challenges like healthcare worker shortages and poor governance in provincial health departments. That is why we were cautiously optimistic when Motsoaledi was replaced by Dr Zweli Mkhize in 2019. We thought it likely that Mkhize would be better at turning rhetoric into actual reform. As it turned out, any hopes of that happening were derailed first by the COVID-19 pandemic, and then more definitively by the Digital Vibes scandal.

The return

In a recent editorial considering possible health ministers after South Africa’s 2024 national elections, we argued that President Cyril Ramaphosa might feel that he can get more out of Motsoaledi back in the health portfolio than at home affairs, where we think it is fair to say he struggled. Even so, hearing Ramaphosa read out Motsoaledi’s name on Sunday night came as a surprise. Our money was on Dr Joe Phaahla staying in the job – as it turns out, he was demoted to again serve as Deputy Minister of Health.

What to make of all of it?

From one perspective, Motsoaledi’s return is understandable. He is a close and loyal ally of Ramaphosa and therefore someone the President would want to keep in his Cabinet. He is a medical doctor who knows the health portfolio. He is a staunch supporter of National Health Insurance (NHI) and his impassioned leadership style is probably considered an asset by the President.

If one considers the Health Minister’s number one task to be the implementation of NHI, and if one sees the implementation of NHI to be an essentially political process, then you can see a case for Motsoaledi’s return.

But even if one accepts this line of argument, it does come with some kinks that are hard to straighten out. For one, the NHI Act is now law and the political battle has thus, to some extent, already been won, and it is time to move from the broad strokes of political rhetoric, that Motsoaledi excels at, to the detail of implementation, which hasn’t been his strong point. And, to the extent that the political battle surrounding NHI has been reopened due to the ANC losing its parliamentary majority, the type of leadership required now will involve building consensus beyond just the ANC, and arguably more challenging for Motsoaledi, making strategic concessions such as allowing a greater role for medical schemes than envisaged in the NHI Act.

But all that only really matters if one accepts the premise that implementing NHI should be the top priority for the Minister of Health.

There is an argument that implementing NHI will take many years and there are much more urgent healthcare issues that need to be dealt with right away. The harsh reality is that provincial health budgets have been shrinking, healthcare worker shortages remain acute, governance in provincial health departments is often a disgrace, and health sector corruption remains a far from solved problem.

During his previous stint as health minister, Motsoaledi faced many of these problems and, while he often said the right things, the bluster wasn’t ever really backed up with a sustained programme of reform. To be sure, there were important successes like the establishment of the Office of Health Standards Compliance and attempts to revitalise health facilities, but when it comes to the fundamentals of having a well-managed healthcare system with enough healthcare workers, the picture was bleak when he left the health ministry in 2019 and it remains so today. In short, there is a view, only reinforced by his struggles at home affairs, that Motsoaledi is not the right person to have in charge if you want to implement the complex, systemic reforms required to sustainably address South Africa’s urgent healthcare problems.

That may be a bit harsh. Ministers are after all politicians and their roles are meant to be political. While it certainly helps to have ministers who are serious about, and committed to the details of implementation, they should be working in conjunction with government departments and directors-general (DGs) in particular. It certainly hasn’t helped our Health Ministers that our National Department of Health has often been overstretched and arguably lacking in strong leadership.

One underlying problem here is that over the last two decades, South Africa’s DGs and heads of provincial government departments for that matter, have too often been yes-men or people appointed as a political favour. While that may in some ways make a minister or MEC’s life easier, it does not make for good governance when a DG or a head of department is a walk-over. Ministers need to lead on policy, but have DGs and deputy DGs who are trusted and empowered to get on with implementation.

One criticism of Motsoaledi’s previous stint in the job is that even though he had a good DG in Precious Matsoso and a few decent deputy DGs, rather than shield them from the political crises of the day, he drew them into those crises. One expert we spoke to this week suggests that Motsoaledi loved the limelight and wouldn’t let others lead while another charged him with not being hands-on enough – maybe the key insight is that those things might all have been true to some extent.

Either way, given Motsoaledi’s strengths and weaknesses and the very complex health challenges South Africa faces, it is now more important than ever that as Minister he leads on political and policy matters, but gives the actual administration the space to lead on implementation. For that to work, he will need a DG who is not just another politician or cadre, but one who is an excellent manager and implementer, and maybe above all, who has the guts to say “no minister” when he or she needs to.

*Low is editor of Spotlight.

Note: Spotlight is editorially independent and is not affiliated with, nor does it endorse any political parties. Spotlight is a member of the South African Press Council.

Republished from Spotlight under a Creative Commons licence.

Read the original article.

Radiation Therapy Graduates Unplaced for Six Months by Health Department

Photo by National Cancer Institute on Unsplash

A number of radiation therapy graduates, who must by law complete the Department of Health’s Internship and Community Service Programme in order to practise medicine, say they have been waiting for nearly six months to be placed in hospitals.

They have finished their four-year studies and now need to complete a year-long internship, referred to as Comserve, in order to register and practice as medical professionals. Their primary role is to administer radiation treatment to patients with cancer.

The community service programme is administered by the National Department of Health.

“We are left in limbo, not sure when we will receive a post,” a graduate from the Western Cape, who wished to be anonymous, told GroundUp. He said that they’ve been told since the beginning of the year by Comserve officials that they are engaging with provinces to secure them placements.

He shared correspondence that said he was not yet allocated a position “due to the unavailability of funded posts”.

He said that it was “frustrating” that they are required by law to do Comserve yet the department cannot find them posts.

“We are all stressed out … We still have bills to pay from university. We are squatting with our parents. We were promised we were going to have a job after studying and now we can’t apply for other jobs. Our hands are cut off. We can’t do anything,” he said.

He said he knew of about nine other radiation therapists also waiting for placements.

Another graduate, from KwaZulu-Natal, said the lack of placement risked creating a backlog when next year’s graduates need to do Comserve.

“At the end of the day, our cancer patients are going to suffer … They need us and we have trained specifically to help them,” she said.

The failure to place graduates is happening despite staff shortages in radiation oncology departments in Gauteng.

On 30 April activists from SECTION27, Cancer Alliance and the Treatment Action Campaign (TAC) as well as cancer patients marched to the offices of the Gauteng department of health demanding that millions of rands set aside for radiation treatment be used.

In an open letter addressed to health MEC Nomantu Nkomo-Ralehoko, the organisations provided a backlog list of about 3000 patients awaiting radiation oncology treatment.

Salomé Meyer of the Cancer Alliance says there are radiation oncology staff shortages in Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital and Steve Biko Academic Hospital.

Both graduates GroundUp spoke to had applied to Charlotte Maxeke for their Comserve year.

In December 2023, the national department stated that nearly 10 400 Comserve applications were received. Of these just shy of 9400 applicants “were successfully placed, and this includes medical doctors, nurses, pharmacists and other health professionals at health facilities throughout the country”.

National Department of Health spokesperson Foster Mohale sent GroundUp an incoherent and incomplete WhatsApp response. “We only know those who were placed. We can’t tell those who were not placed because we are not sure of their career plans,” he wrote.

Asked about staff shortages, Mohale wrote that the department “prioritises all critical posts using limited budget”.

The Gauteng Department of Health did not respond to our questions about radiology therapist Comserve placements and staff shortages in its hospitals, despite committing to do so and repeated follow-ups.

Republished from GroundUp under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Read the original article