Year: 2023

Navigating the Maze of the Brain’s Glymphatic System

Photo by Robina Weermeijer on Unsplash

Like the lymphatic system in the body, the glymphatic system in the brain clears metabolic waste and distributes nutrients and other important compounds. Impairments in this system may contribute to brain diseases, such as neurodegenerative diseases and stroke.

A team of researchers has found a noninvasive and nonpharmaceutical method to influence glymphatic transport using focused ultrasound, opening the opportunity to use the method to further study brain diseases and brain function. Their findings are published in PNAS.

Hong Chen, associate professor of biomedical engineering in McKelvey Engineering and of neurological surgery in the School of Medicine, and her team, including Dezhuang (Summer) Ye, a postdoctoral research associate, and Si (Stacie) Chen, a former postdoctoral research associate, found the first direct evidence that focused ultrasound, combined with circulating microbubbles (FUSMB) could mechanically enhance glymphatic transport in the mouse brain.

Focused ultrasound can penetrate the scalp and skull to reach the brain and precisely target a defined region within the brain. Previously, Chen’s team found that microbubbles injected into the bloodstream amplify the effects of the ultrasound waves on the blood vessels and generate a pumping effect, which helps with the accumulation of intranasally delivered agents in the brain, such as drugs or gene therapy treatments.

“Intranasal delivery provides a novel, noninvasive route to investigate the glymphatic pathway in intact brains,” Chen said. “This route for investigating glymphatic transport has the potential to be utilised in the study of glymphatic function in humans, which is currently limited by the absence of noninvasive approaches to access the glymphatic system.”

In the new research, the team administered a fluorescently labelled tracer intranasally. Then they administered focused ultrasound waves aimed deep in the brain at the thalamus after intravenous injection of microbubbles. When they conducted 3D imaging of the brain tissue on the treated side, they found that FUSMB boosted the transport of the tracer in the perivascular space.

They compared this with three control groups with various combinations of focused ultrasound, microbubbles and the tracer. All of the mice in the three control groups showed lower tracer accumulation, which verified to the team that the enhanced tracer transport was the result of the focused ultrasound with microbubbles.

To further validate their results, they used the FUSMB treatment after injecting the tracer directly to the cerebral spinal fluid, an invasive yet commonly used method. They found that FUSMB also enhanced the transport of tracers along the vessels at the focused-ultrasound targeted brain site by about two- to threefold compared with the non-targeted side.

“Regardless of whether tracers were delivered via the intranasal or injected route, FUSMB consistently improved glymphatic transport,” Ye said. “Our study using confocal microscopy imaging combined with brain-tissue clearing obtained direct evidence that unequivocally proved that FUSMB enhanced the glymphatic transport of a labeled protein agent in mice.”

The team also investigated various types of vessels, including arterioles, capillaries and venules, that facilitate FUSMB-enhanced transport of the tracer using both intranasal and injected delivery of the tracer. They saw improved glymphatic transport of the tracer in both arterioles and capillaries with both types of delivery. They found that the fluorescence intensity was higher along arterioles than capillaries and venules.

“This study opens new opportunities to use ultrasound combined with microbubbles as a noninvasive and nonpharmacological approach to manipulate glymphatic transport,” Ye said. “Focused ultrasound-activated microbubbles have the promise to enhance waste clearance in the brain and potentially mitigate brain diseases caused by impairments in glymphatic system function.”

Chen said the team will now focus on applying this noninvasive and nonpharmacological method for brain waste clearance to potentially combat neurodegenerative diseases, such as Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s diseases.

Source: University of Washington in St. Louis

Study Finds Healthy Diet is Independently Linked to Fitness

Photo by Charlotte Karlsen on Unsplash

A healthy diet is associated with greater physical fitness in middle-aged adults, according to research published in the European Journal of Preventive Cardiology.

“This study provides some of the strongest and most rigorous data thus far to support the connection that better diets may lead to higher fitness,” said study author Dr Michael Mi of Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center. “The improvement in fitness we observed in participants with better diets was similar to the effect of taking 4000 more steps each day.”

Cardiorespiratory fitness reflects the body’s ability to provide and use oxygen for exercise, and it integrates the health of multiple organ systems, such as the heart, lungs, blood vessels and muscles. It is one of the most powerful predictors of longevity and health. While exercise increases cardiorespiratory fitness, it is also the case that among people who exercise the same amount, there are differences in fitness, suggesting that additional factors contribute. A nutritious diet is associated with numerous health benefits, but it has been unclear whether it is also related to fitness.

This study examined whether a healthy diet is associated with physical fitness in community-dwelling adults. The study included 2380 individuals in the Framingham Heart Study. The average age was 54 years and 54% were women. Participants underwent a maximum effort cardiopulmonary exercise test on a cycle ergometer to measure peak VO2. This is the gold standard assessment of fitness and indicates the amount of oxygen used during the highest possible intensity exercise.

Participants also completed the Harvard semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire to assess intake of 126 dietary items during the last year ranging from never or less than once per month to six or more servings per day. The information was used to rate diet quality using the Alternative Healthy Eating Index (AHEI; 0 to 110) and Mediterranean-style Diet Score (MDS; 0 to 25), which are both associated with heart health. Higher scores indicated a better quality diet emphasising vegetables, fruits, whole grains, nuts, legumes, fish and healthy fats and limiting red meat and alcohol.

The researchers evaluated the association between diet quality and fitness after controlling for other factors that could influence the relationship, including age, sex, total daily energy intake, body mass index, smoking status, cholesterol levels, blood pressure, diabetes and routine physical activity level. The average AHEI and MDS were 66.7 and 12.4, respectively. Compared with the average score, an increase of 13 points on the AHEI and 4.7 on the MDS was associated with a 5.2% and 4.5% greater peak VO2, respectively.

Dr Mi said: “In middle-aged adults, healthy dietary patterns were strongly and favourably associated with fitness even after taking habitual activity levels into account. The relationship was similar in women and men, and more pronounced in those under 54 years of age compared to older adults.”

To discover the potential mechanism linking diet and fitness, the researchers performed further analyses. They examined the relationship between diet quality, fitness and metabolites, which are substances produced during digestion and released into the blood during exercise. Researchers measured 201 metabolites (eg amino acids) in blood samples collected in a subset of 1154 study participants. Some 24 metabolites were associated with either poor diet and fitness, or with favourable diet and fitness, after adjusting for the same factors considered in the previous analyses. Dr Mi said: “Our metabolite data suggest that eating healthily is associated with better metabolic health, which could be one possible way that it leads to improved fitness and ability to exercise.”

“This was an observational study and we cannot conclude that eating well causes better fitness, or exclude the possibility of a reverse relationship, i.e. that fit individuals choose to eat healthily.”

Dr Mi concluded: “There are already many compelling health reasons to consume a high-quality diet, and we provide yet another one with its association with fitness. A Mediterranean-style diet with fresh, whole foods and minimal processed foods, red meat and alcohol is a great place to start.”

Source: European Society of Cardiology

Loadshedding Hits Clinic Waiting Times

Photo by Jarl Schmidt on Unsplash

By Peter Luhanga for GroundUp

Loadshedding is affecting waiting times at the Dunoon Community Health Centre in Cape Town, with patients saying they queue for hours and are still sent home without their medication.

Dunoon resident Mavis Matomane, 54, said she woke up early on Thursday 11 May to be at the clinic in time for an appointment made five months ago.

When she arrived at 7am, she joined a long queue standing outside in the rain. Matomane needs medication for arthritis and high blood pressure. She said the clinic was serving people who had arrived the day before but had not been seen to and had been told to return on 11 May.

She was seen by nurses for diagnosis after 11am and only left the hospital with her medication at 3pm.

Neliswa Bobotyana, who lives in Ibaleni informal settlement in the township, said she accompanied her boyfriend to the Dunoon centre on Monday 8 May. He was seen by a doctor and told to wait to get X-rays, but the X-ray facility closed while he was still waiting. On Tuesday his condition had deteriorated and she took him back to the health centre where he was told to open a new folder. He was sent back home and returned on Wednesday 10 May and was taken to the New Somerset Hospital where he was finally given medication.

Other residents have complained on a neighbourhood online group.

Western Cape Department of Health spokesperson Natalie Watlington said as a result of loadshedding and problems with the data centre in George, pharmacy applications for patient medication were offline on 10 May.

“Our pharmacist therefore requested patients to return the next day for their medication. We acknowledge that at times loadshedding may affect our phone lines and IT systems. It may take more time to draw your folder or process your details as a patient,” said Watlington.

She said on average 150 adults and 180 children arrived without appointments every day. This was on top of about 120 clinician appointments and 100 family planning appointments per day.

She said there were problems when patients who did not arrive on their appointment day arrived as walk-in patients on other days. There were an average of 80 missed appointments a day, Watlington said.

Watlington said patients sticking to appointment times did not need to arrive early. Waiting times differed according to the nature of the complaint and the treatment.

Republished from GroundUp under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Source: GroundUp

New WHO Guideline Advises Against Non-sugar Sweeteners for Weight Management

The World Health Organization (WHO) has released a new guideline on non-sugar sweeteners (NSS), which recommends against using NSS to control body weight or reduce the risk of noncommunicable diseases (NCDs).

This comes as WHO conducts its first review of obesity management guideline in more than two decades. Last week, Francesco Branca, WHO director of nutrition and food safety, had also warned that weight-loss drugs such as Wegovy are “not a silver bullet” in tackling obesity.

The recommendation is based on the findings of a systematic review of the available evidence which suggests that use of NSS does not confer any long-term benefit in reducing body fat in adults or children. Results of the review also suggest that there may be potential undesirable effects from long-term use of NSS, such as an increased risk of type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, and mortality in adults.

“Replacing free sugars with NSS does not help with weight control in the long term. People need to consider other ways to reduce free sugars intake, such as consuming food with naturally occurring sugars, like fruit, or unsweetened food and beverages,” says Francesco Branca, WHO Director for Nutrition and Food Safety. “NSS are not essential dietary factors and have no nutritional value. People should reduce the sweetness of the diet altogether, starting early in life, to improve their health.”

The recommendation applies to all people except individuals with pre-existing diabetes and includes all synthetic and naturally occurring or modified non-nutritive sweeteners that are not classified as sugars found in manufactured foods and beverages, or sold on their own to be added to foods and beverages by consumers. Common NSS include acesulfame K, aspartame, advantame, cyclamates, neotame, saccharin, sucralose, stevia and stevia derivatives.

The recommendation does not apply to personal care and hygiene products containing NSS, such as toothpaste, skin cream, and medications, or to low-calorie sugars and sugar alcohols (polyols), which are sugars or sugar derivatives containing calories and are therefore not considered NSS.

Because the link observed in the evidence between NSS and disease outcomes might be confounded by baseline characteristics of study participants and complicated patterns of NSS use, the recommendation has been assessed as conditional, following WHO processes for developing guidelines. This signals that policy decisions based on this recommendation may require substantive discussion in specific country contexts, linked for example to the extent of consumption in different age groups.

The WHO guideline on NSS is part of a suite of existing and forthcoming guidelines on healthy diets that aim to establish lifelong healthy eating habits, improve dietary quality and decrease the risk of NCDs worldwide.

Source: WHO

Not Yet Time to Ditch Masks in Healthcare, Experts Argue

Photo by SJ Objio on Unsplash

A new commentary by infectious disease experts published in Annals of Internal Medicine says that, for patient safety, masking should continue in health care settings. This message, from authors at George Washington University School of Medicine and the National Institutes of Health (NIH), conflicts with a recent commentary from authors from 8 US institutions suggesting that the time for universal masking is over.

Masking has been a controversial mitigation strategy during the COVID pandemic because high-quality evidence of efficacy is lacking and because the topic has become highly politicised. Regardless, real-world experience demonstrates the effectiveness of mask-wearing in clinical settings where data shows that transmission from patient-to-staff and staff-to-patent, when both are masked, is uncommon. Since health care personnel report being driven to show up for work even when they are ill themselves, the argument in support of mask-wearing becomes even more compelling.

Those without symptoms may also transmit respiratory viruses, particularly SARS-CoV-2. While the Omicron strain has been milder, infection could still cause severe or life-threatening disease or prolonged illness if transmitted to at-risk patients, such as the elderly or immunocompromised. With the still-looming risks, now does not seem the time to take off masks in the health care setting. Instead, the authors advocate strongly for continued mask use for infection prevention.

Source: EurekAlert!

Possible Explanation for Why More Men Develop Hearing Loss in Old Age

Photo by Kindel Media on Pexels

A new study led by Yale School of Medicine scientists and published in BMC has pinpointed why some adults – by some estimates, at least 50% of the population after 75 years of age – develop hearing problems.

While congenital hearing impairment – usually presenting in childhood – result from rare mutations, hearing problems in adults are likely due to the cumulative effect of polygenic risk and environmental factors.

Recent genome-wide association studies have uncovered several risk genes that are implicated in hearing problems in adults, however some factors still have not adequately been investigated by large-scale genetic studies.

For instance, there is limited information about why hearing problems among older adults are more common, more severe, and with earlier onset in men than in women. It is uncertain how hearing-related polygenic risk translates among people of diverse ancestral backgrounds.

While environmental risk factors such as noise exposure and tobacco smoking are known to increase the risk of hearing problems, the molecular mechanisms underlying these associations are unclear.

Researchers sampled nearly 750 000 adults and identified 54 risk variants – including 12 novel variants – that could contribute to hearing problems. They also highlighted how hormonal regulation may play a role in the differences between hearing problems in men and women.

Analysing multiple ancestry groups, the researchers demonstrated that polygenic risk in hearing problems is shared across human populations. They also determined genes involved in brain development interact with sex, noise pollution, and tobacco smoking in relation to their associations with hearing problems.

“Our results support that large-scale genetic studies are useful instruments to understand the biology and the epidemiology of hearing problems in adults,” said Renato Polimanti, PhD, associate professor of psychiatry at Yale School of Medicine and senior author of the study.

Overall, the findings contribute to identifying possible molecular targets for drug development and define novel strategies to identify older adults at risk of losing their hearing.

The study could lead to changes in how older adults with hearing problems are assessed and treated. Hearing loss can impair communications, and that can result in social isolation with major health, psychosocial, and economic consequences, reducing the quality of life of those affected.

Source: Yale University

Did the FDA Break its Own Rules in Approving New Antibiotic?

Photo by Rodion Kutsaiev on Unsplash

In the US, drug approval needs “substantial evidence” of effectiveness – but an investigation by The BMJ into the recent approval of the antibiotic Recarbrio from Merck suggests that these standards are being bypassed.

Recarbrio is a combination therapy made up of a new beta-lactamase inhibitor (relebactam) and a decades old Merck antibiotic (imipenem-cilastatin) to treat complicated infections. It costs $4000–$15 000 for a course, compared with a couple of hundred dollars for the generic version of Merck’s old antibiotic.

Peter Doshi, senior editor at The BMJ, describes how US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) scientists had serious doubts about its highly expensive Recarbrio but the agency approved it anyway.

Did the FDA break its own rules in approving this antibiotic, and what does this case tell us about problems within the agency, he asks? 

In its FDA application, Merck submitted results from two clinical trials comparing Recarbrio with imipenem in adults with complicated urinary tract infections and in patients with complex intra-abdominal infections.

But FDA reviewers noted that Merck had studied the wrong patient population to evaluate the added benefits of the new drug, and said the trial for urinary tract infections showed that Recarbrio was as much as 21% less effective than the older, cheaper imipenem.

The FDA concluded that “these studies are not considered adequate and well-controlled.” And of a third clinical study, the FDA called it a “very small,” “difficult to interpret” “descriptive trial with no pre-specified plans for hypothesis testing.”

Yet despite all three clinical studies not providing substantial evidence of effectiveness, FDA approved Recarbrio.

“Instead of basing its decision on the clinical trials in Merck’s application, FDA’s determination of Recarbrio’s efficacy was justified on past evidence that imipenem was effective, plus – to justify the new relebactam component – in vitro (lab) studies and animal models of infection rather than evidence from human trials as required by law,” writes Doshi.

Others are concerned that Recarbrio’s approval essentially amounts to a return to a way of regulating medicines that the FDA abandoned a half century ago prior to the agency’s “substantial evidence” standard.

Doshi explains that, under specific circumstances, the Director of the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) can waive in whole or in part the FDA’s “adequate and well-controlled studies” approval criteria. But the FDA told The BMJ ”there was no center director memo in the file” for Recarbrio.

And when The BMJ contacted Janet Woodcock, CDER Director at the time, and now the FDA’s Principal Deputy Commissioner, she said she was not aware that clinical studies showed Recarbrio did not provide substantial evidence of effectiveness.

Woodcock was also unable to confirm that approvals of new drugs require at least one clinical study of the drug itself that demonstrates substantial evidence – evidence lacking in the case of Recarbrio.

A spokesperson for CDER told The BMJ that FDA “applied regulatory flexibility” in approving Recarbrio. 

It is unclear whether this regulatory flexibility enabled FDA to conclude Recarbrio had met the legal “substantial evidence” standard without “adequate and well-controlled investigations” of Recarbrio, says Doshi. FDA declined to answer the question, saying “We have no additional information to provide.”

The decline of science at the FDA has become unmanageable, argues David Ross, associate clinical professor of medicine at George Washington University, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, and former FDA medical reviewer, in a linked commentary.

He describes Recarbrio’s approval as “shocking” and says while much of the blame must go to the FDA’s reliance on industry paid user fees for around two-thirds of its annual drugs budget, “the corruption of the FDA’s scientific culture remains the primary culprit driving the deterioration of safety and effectiveness standards.”

To address this “dismal situation” he suggests tapering the FDA’s dependence on user fees and improving public access to the information received by the FDA, its reasoning, and its decisions.

“The Recarbrio approval is a sentinel event, warning of a return to an era when drug effectiveness was an afterthought,” argues Ross. “Although the FDA crowed about this approval, it would have been better advised to remember that “for a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for nature cannot be fooled,” he concludes.

Source: EurekAlert!

Myocarditis Study Points to ‘Over-revved’ Immune System from COVID Jab

Photo by Mika Baumeister on Unsplash

With the administration of the first COVID vaccines two years ago, public health officials found an increase in cases of myocarditis, particularly among young males who had been vaccinated with mRNA vaccines. The underlying cause of these reactions remained a mystery.

Now Yale scientists have identified the immune signature of these heart inflammation cases. Published in the journal Science Immunology, their findings eliminate some of the theorised causes of the heart inflammation and point to the consequences of a slightly over-stimulated immune system.

Myocarditis is a generally mild inflammation of heart tissue which can cause scarring but is usually resolved within days. The increased incidence of myocarditis during vaccination was seen primarily in males in their teens or early 20s, who had been vaccinated with mRNA vaccines, which are designed to elicit immune responses specifically to the SARS-CoV-2 virus.

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), among males aged 12 to 17, about 22 to 36 per 100 000 experienced myocarditis within 21 days after receiving a second vaccine dose. The incidence of myocarditis was 50.1 to 64.9 cases per 100 000 after infection with the COVID virus among males in this age group.

For the new study, the Yale research team conducted a detailed analysis of immune system responses in those rare cases of myocarditis among vaccinated individuals. They found that the heart inflammation was not caused by antibodies created by the vaccine, but rather by a more generalised response involving immune cells and inflammation.

“The immune systems of these individuals get a little too revved up and over-produce cytokine and cellular responses,” said team leader Carrie Lucas, associate professor of immunobiology.

Earlier research had suggested that increasing the time between vaccination shots from four to eight weeks may reduce risk of developing myocarditis.

Lucas noted that, according to CDC findings, the risk of myocarditis is significantly greater in unvaccinated individuals who contract COVID than in the vaccinated. She emphasised that vaccination offers the best protection from COVID-related disease.

“I hope this new knowledge will enable further optimising mRNA vaccines, which, in addition to offering clear health benefits during the pandemic, have a tremendous potential to save lives across numerous future applications,” said Anis Barmada, an MD/PhD student at Yale School of Medicine, who is a co-first author of the paper with Jon Klein, also a Yale MD/PhD student.

Source: Yale University

Atherosclerosis is a Greater Heart Attack Risk for Women

Source: Wikimedia CC0

Postmenopausal women with atherosclerosis are at higher risk of heart attacks than men of similar age, according to research presented at EACVI 2023, a scientific congress of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC), and published in European Heart Journal – Cardiovascular Imaging. Researchers used imaging techniques to examine the arteries of nearly 25 000 patients and followed them for heart attacks and death.

“The study suggests that a given burden of atherosclerosis is riskier in postmenopausal women than it is in men of that age,” said study author Dr Sophie van Rosendael of Leiden University Medical Centre. “Since atherosclerotic plaque burden is emerging as a target to decide the intensity of therapy to prevent heart attacks, the findings may impact treatment. Our results indicate that after menopause, women may need a higher dose of statins or the addition of another lipid-lowering drug. More studies are needed to confirm these findings.”

While young women do have heart attacks, in general, women develop atherosclerosis (narrowing of arteries due to plaque buildup) later in life than men and have heart attacks at an older age than men, in part because of the protective effect of oestrogen. This study examined whether the prognostic importance of atherosclerotic plaques are the same for women and men at different ages as this could be important for selecting treatments to prevent heart attacks.

The study included 24 950 patients referred for coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) and enrolled in the CONFIRM registry, which was conducted in six countries in North America, Europe, and Asia. CCTA is used to obtain 3D images of the arteries in the heart.

Total atherosclerotic burden was rated using the Leiden CCTA score, which incorporates the following items for each coronary segment: plaque presence (yes/no), composition (calcified, noncalcified or mixed), location, and severity of narrowing, for a final value of 0 to 42. Patients were divided into three categories previously found to predict the risk myocardial infarction: low atherosclerotic burden (0 to 5), medium (6 to 20) and high (over 20). In addition, obstructive coronary artery disease was defined as 50% narrowing or more.

The primary outcome was the difference in Leiden CCTA score between women and men of similar age. The investigators also analysed sex differences in the rates of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), which included all-cause death and myocardial infarction, after adjusting for age and cardiovascular risk factors (hypertension, high cholesterol, diabetes, current smoking and family history of coronary artery disease).

A total of 11 678 women (average age 58.5 years) and 13 272 men (average age 55.6 years) were followed for 3.7 years. Regarding the primary outcome, the study showed an approximately 12 year delay in the onset of coronary atherosclerosis in women: the median Leiden CCTA risk score was above zero at age 64 to 68 years in women versus 52 to 56 years in men (p<0.001). In addition, the overall plaque burden as quantified by the Leiden CCTA score was significantly lower in women, who had more non-obstructive disease.

Dr. van Rosendael said: “The results confirm the previously reported delay in the start of atherosclerosis in women. We also found that women are more likely to have non-obstructive disease. It was formerly thought that only obstructive atherosclerosis caused myocardial infarction but we now know that non-obstructive disease is also risky.”
 
The burden of atherosclerosis was equally predictive of MACE in premenopausal women (aged under 55 years) and men of the same age group. However, in postmenopausal women (age 55 years and older), the risk of MACE was higher than men for a given score. In postmenopausal women, compared to those with a low burden, those with a medium and high burden had 2.21-fold and 6.11-fold higher risks of MACE. While in men aged 55 years and older, compared to those with a low burden, those with a medium and high burden had 1.57-fold and 2.25-fold greater risks of MACE.

Dr van Rosendael said: “In this study, the elevated risk for women versus men was especially observed in postmenopausal women with the highest Leiden CCTA score. This could be partly because the inner diameter of coronary arteries is smaller in women, meaning that the same amount of plaque could have a larger impact on blood flow. Our findings link the known acceleration of atherosclerosis development after menopause with a significant increase in relative risk for women compared to men, despite a similar burden of atherosclerotic disease. This may have implications for the intensity of medical treatment.”

Source: European Society of Cardiology

Solriamfetol is Best for Banishing Excessive Daytime Sleepiness

New research in the Annals of Internal Medicine reports that the drug solriamfetol is the most effective treatment for excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) for people with obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA).

The standard treatment for OSA is a positive airway pressure (PAP) mask that uses compressed air to support lung airways during sleep. However, some people with OSA still experience EDS and may benefit from anti-fatigue medication.

“The most important thing that people with OSA should do is use their PAP machine, but if they are still sleepy there are options in the form of medications that can reduce their tiredness,” said first author Tyler Pitre, a resident physician in internal medicine at McMaster University and incoming respirology fellow at the University of Toronto.

“Fifteen to 30 per cent of people in North America have a diagnosis of OSA and the prevalence could be much higher as many others are undiagnosed. Many people have symptoms as the condition is highly associated with obesity, which affects a large and increasing number of people in Canada, the United States and other high-income countries,” he said.

“Among those patients, many will have EDS, which affects their quality of life, making them less productive and also puts them at risk of other psychological issues. Improving this situation is of paramount importance to physicians.”

Pitre said that OSA affects nearly one billion people globally, leaving many of them at risk of EDS.

Zeraatkar and Pitre made their findings by conducting a systematic review of 14 clinical trials of anti-fatigue medications involving 3085 people, as well as analysing data from MEDLINE, CENTRAL, EMBASE and ClinicalTrials.gov in a specific network meta-analysis. They conducted their research from October 2022 to January 2023.

Senior author Zeraatkar said that while solriamfetol is likely the best medication for EDS, the drugs armodafinil-modafinil and pitolisant are also effective in combatting fatigue.

Solriamfetol can also raise blood pressure, especially risky for people with OSA, as many of them also have cardiovascular issues.

“It would be interesting to see how effective these anti-fatigue medications will be for treating related illnesses such as chronic fatigue syndrome and long COVID, now that we know they work for a similar condition,” said Zeraatkar, an assistant professor of the Department of Anesthesia.

Source: McMaster University