Tag: race/ethnicity

Massive US Study Finds that ‘Race’ is a Poor Proxy for Genetic Ancestry

Photo by ROCKETMANN TEAM

Genetic ancestry is much more complicated than how people report their race and ethnicity. New research, using data from the National Institutes of Health’s (NIH) All of Us Research Program, finds that people who identify as being from the same race or ethnic group can have a wide range of genetic differences. The findings are reported June 5 in the American Journal of Human Genetics.

As doctors and researchers learn more about how genetic variants influence the incidence and course of human diseases, the study of genetic ancestry has become increasingly important. This research is driving the field of precision medicine, which aims to develop individualized healthcare.

People whose ancestors came from the same part of the world are likely to have inherited the same genetic variants, but self-identified race and ethnicity don’t tell the whole story about a person’s ancestors. NIH’s All of Us Research Program was created in part to address this puzzle and to learn more about how genetic ancestry influences human health.

In the current study, the investigators looked at the DNA of more than 230 000 people who have volunteered to share their health information for All of Us. They compared it to other large DNA projects from around the world using a technique called principal component analysis (PCA) to visualise population structure and help identify genetic similarity between individuals and groups of people. This analysis showed that people in the US have very mixed ancestry, and their DNA doesn’t always match the race or ethnicity they write on forms. Instead of falling into clear groups based on race or ethnicity, people’s genetic backgrounds show gradients of variation across different US regions and states.

This is especially significant for people who identify as being of Hispanic or Latino origin. These people have a wide-ranging blend of ancestries from European, Native American, and African groups. Importantly, genetic ancestry among these people varies across the US in part because of historic migration patterns. For example, Hispanics/Latinos in the Northeast are more likely to have Caribbean (and thus African) ancestry, and those in the Southwest are more likely to have Mexican and Central American (and thus Native American) ancestry.

One specific discovery was that ancestry was significantly associated with body mass index (BMI) and height, even after adjusting for socio-economic differences. For example, West and Central African ancestries were associated with higher BMI, whereas East Africa ancestry was associated with lower BMI. There were similar findings showing that people with ancestral origins from different parts of Europe have different body measurements including height, with northern European ancestry associated with greater height and southern European ancestry associated with shorter height. This suggests that subcontinental differences in ancestry can have opposite effects on biological traits and diseases.

This finding suggests that the subcontinental differences in ancestry between individuals can have opposite effects on biological traits, diseases, and health outcomes, emphasising the importance of not classifying individuals into broad ancestry groups such as African, European, or Asian. Doing this will help to make this research more accurate and will help to improve the field of precision medicine.

Source: Cell Press via EurekAlert!

Men More Than Three Times as Likely to Die From a Brain Injury, New Study Shows

Photo by Anna Shvets

A new analysis of mortality data reveals the disproportionate impact of traumatic brain injuries (TBI) on older adults, males and certain racial and ethnic groups. The study, published in the peer-reviewed journal Brain Injury, provides a comprehensive analysis of TBI-related deaths across different population groups across the US in 2021.

The findings indicate that suicides remain the most common cause of TBI-related deaths, followed by unintentional falls, and specific groups are disproportionately affected by these tragedies.

Men, in particular, were found to be most likely to die from a TBI – more than three times the rate of women (30.5 versus 9.4). The reasons observed were multifactorial and could reflect differences in injury severity following a fall or motor vehicle crash, to the interaction of sex and age – with TBI outcomes in men worsening with age, while postmenopausal women fare better than men of similar age.

“While anyone is at risk for getting a TBI, some groups have a higher chance than others of dying from one. We identified specific populations who are most affected. In addition to men, older adults are especially at risk, with unintentional falls being a major cause of TBI-related death. American Indian or Alaska Native people also have higher rates of these fatal injuries,” says lead author Alexis Peterson PhD, of the National Center for Injury Prevention and Control at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

“These findings highlight the importance of tailored prevention strategies to reach groups who may be at higher risk and the role healthcare providers can play in reducing TBI-related deaths through early intervention and culturally sensitive care.”

TBI remains a leading cause of injury-related death in the US In 2020, TBIs were associated with around a quarter of all injury-related deaths.

Using data from the National Vital Statistics System, the new analysis identified 69 473 TBI-related deaths among US residents during 2021. The age-adjusted TBI-related mortality rate was 19.5 per 100 000, representing an 8.8% increase from 2020.

Through statistical modeling, the researchers examined the simultaneous effect of multiple factors such as geographic region, sex, race and ethnicity, and age, on TBI-related mortality.

Key findings include:

  • Older adults (75+) had the highest rates of TBI-related deaths, with unintentional falls being the most common cause in this age group.
  • Non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaska Native individuals experienced the highest TBI-related death rate (31.5) compared to other racial and ethnic groups.
  • There were 37,635 TBI-related deaths categorised as unintentional injuries (ie, motor vehicle crashes, unintentional falls, unintentionally struck by or against an object, other).
  • 30,801 were categorized as intentional injuries (ie, all mechanisms of suicide and homicide).
  • Children aged from birth to 17 years accounted for around 4% of TBI-related deaths (2,977).

The authors emphasise the critical role of healthcare providers in preventing TBI-related deaths, particularly with groups at higher risk. “By assessing patients who may be at higher risk for TBI, especially due to falls or mental health challenges, healthcare providers can make timely referrals and recommend culturally tailored interventions to prevent further injury or death,” says Dr Peterson.

Public health efforts should focus on addressing the underlying causes of TBI-related deaths, such as unintentional falls and mental health crises, to help prevent further loss of life. “TBIs remain a significant public health concern, especially among older adults, men, and certain racial and ethnic groups,” says Peterson.  “CDC has proven resources that healthcare providers can use to not only reduce health disparities that increase the risk for TBI but also improve care for anyone affected by a TBI.”

The authors note the COVID-19 pandemic could have influenced TBI-related death trends in 2021. They also acknowledge several limitations of this analysis, including potential misclassification or incomplete documentation of causes on death certificates, which may lead to inaccuracies in estimating TBI-related deaths.

Source: Taylor & Francis Group

Prostate Cancer Blood Test Equally Effective Across Ethnic Groups

Photo by Nicholas Swatz

The Stockholm3 blood test, developed by researchers at Karolinska Institutet, is equally effective at detecting prostate cancer in different ethnic groups, according to a new paper published in The Journal of Clinical Oncology. The test produces significantly better results than the current PSA standard.

Stockholm3, a prostate cancer test developed in Sweden, runs a combination of protein and genetic markers from a blood sample through an algorithm to find the probability of a patient having clinically significant cancer. 

Studies in more than 90 000 men have shown that Stockholm3 produces significantly better results than the current PSA standard. The test improves prostate cancer diagnosis by reducing unnecessary MRI and biopsies and by identifying significant cancers in men with low or normal PSA values.   

Ethnically diverse group

However, previous studies have been conducted primarily in Scandinavia on a mainly White population with uncertain generalisability to the rest of the world. A Swedish-American research group has now examined how well it works in an ethnically mixed group of men in the USA and Canada. 

The study included over 2000 men at 17 different clinics, 16% of whom were Asian, 24% African-American, 14% Latin American and 46% White American.  All participants had a referral for a prostate biopsy on the basis of an elevated PSA score, abnormal rectal examination, MRI scan or other suspicious clinical finding.  

Before the biopsy was performed, a blood test was taken along with clinical data pertinent to the Stockholm3 test, which was conducted blinded to the biopsy results. 

Halving the number of unnecessary biopsies

The analysis shows that clinically relevant prostate cancer cases were found in a total of 29% of the men, somewhat more in African Americans and slightly fewer in Asians. 

It also shows that the Stockholm3 test could almost halve the number of unnecessary biopsies (45 per cent fewer: 673 as opposed to 1226) while being no less effective at detecting all clinically relevant cases. The results were similar across the different ethnic groups. 

“The study demonstrates that the Stockholm3 test is just as effective on an ethnically mixed group as it is on a White, Swedish population,” says the study’s lead author Hari T. Vigneswaran, doctor and PhD student at the Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet. 

According to him, the research answers several important questions and will lead to a more widespread use of the method: 

“Colleagues in other countries are very interested in these data, which show that Stockholm3 works for a non-Swedish population and among minorities.” 

Source: Karolinska Institutet

Systematic Biases on Race and Gender at Play in Clinical Trials

Photo by National Cancer Institute on Unsplash

Randomized controlled trials, or RCTs, are believed to be the best way to study the safety and efficacy of new treatments in clinical research. However, a recent study from Michigan State University found that people of colour and white women are significantly underrepresented in RCTs due to systematic biases. 

The study, published in the Journal of Ethnicity in Substance Abuse, reviewed 18 RCTs conducted over the last 15 years that tested treatments for post-traumatic stress and alcohol use disorder. The researchers found that despite women having double the rates of post-traumatic stress and alcohol use disorder than men, and people of colour having worse chronicity than white people, most participants were white (59.5%) and male (about 78%). 

“Because RCTs are the gold standard for treatment studies and drug trials, we rarely ask the important questions about their limitations and failings,” said Nicole Buchanan, co-author of the study and professor in MSU’s Department of Psychology. “For RCTs to meet their full potential, investigators need to fix barriers to inclusion. Increasing representation in RCTs is not simply an issue for equity, but it is also essential to enhancing the quality of our science and meeting the needs of the public that funds these studies through their hard-earned tax dollars.”

The researchers found that the design and implementation of the randomised controlled trials contributed to the lack of representation of people of colour and women. This happened because trials were conducted in areas where white men were the majority demographic group and study samples almost always reflected the demographic makeup where studies occurred. Additionally, those designing the studies seldom acknowledged race or gender differences, meaning they did not intentionally recruit diverse samples.

Furthermore, the journals publishing these studies did not have regulations requiring sample diversity, equity or inclusion as appropriate to the conditions under investigation.

“Marginalized groups have unique experiences from privileged groups, and when marginalised groups are poorly included in research, we remain in the dark about their experiences, insights, needs and strengths,” said Mallet Reid, co-author of the study and doctoral candidate in MSU’s Department of Psychology. “This means that clinicians and researchers may unknowingly remain ignorant to how to attend to the trauma and addiction challenges facing marginalised groups and may unwittingly perpetuate microaggressions against marginalised groups in clinical settings or fail to meet their needs.”

Source: Michigan State University

First Menstrual Periods are Arriving Earlier for Younger Generations

Photo by Marta Branco

The average age at menarche, the first menstrual period, has been decreasing among younger generations in the US, especially those belonging to racial minorities and lower socioeconomic statuses, according to a new study led by researchers at Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health. It also found that the average time it takes for the menstrual cycle to become regular is increasing.

The study, published in JAMA Network Open, is the latest publication from the Apple Women’s Health Study, a longitudinal study of menstrual cycles, gynaecological conditions, and overall women’s health conducted by Harvard Chan School, the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, and Apple.

“Our findings can lead to a better understanding of menstrual health across the lifespan and how our lived environment impacts this critical vital sign,” said co-principal investigator Shruthi Mahalingaiah, assistant professor of environmental, reproductive, and women’s health at Harvard Chan School.

While previous studies have shown trends towards earlier menarche over the past five decades, data has been limited on how these trends present within different racial groups and socioeconomic statuses. Additionally, few studies have had sufficient data to identify any trends regarding time to menstrual cycle regularity.

The researchers used the Apple Women’s Health Study’s large, diverse dataset to fill this research gap. The 71 341 participants who enrolled between November 2018 and March 2023 self-reported the age at which they first began menstruating and their race and socioeconomic status. The researchers divided the participants into five age brackets: born between 1950–1969, 1970–1979, 1980–1989, 1990–1999, and 2000-2005. Ages of menarche were defined as early (younger than 11 years old), very early (younger than 9), and late (ages 16 and above). A subset of participants (61 932) self-reported the time it took for their menstrual cycle to become regular and were divided into five categories: up to two years, between three and four years, longer than five years, hasn’t become regular, or became regular with use of hormones. Another subset (9865) provided their body mass index (BMI) at their age of menarche.

The study found that as birth year increased (meaning younger participants), average age at menarche decreased and time from menarche to menstrual cycle regularity increased. Among participants born from 1950–1969, the average age at menarche was 12.5 years, and the rates of early and very early menarche were 8.6% and 0.6%, respectively. Among participants born from 2000–2005, the average age of menarche was 11.9 years, and the rates of early and very early menarche were 15.5% and 1.4%, respectively. Across the two groups, the percentage of participants who reached menstrual cycle regularity within two years of menarche decreased from 76% to 56%. The researchers observed that these trends were present among all sociodemographic groups but were most pronounced among the participants who identified as Black, Hispanic, Asian, or mixed race, and who rated themselves as belonging to a low socioeconomic status.

The findings showed that BMI at age of menarche could explain part of the trend toward periods starting earlier. Other possible factors that might explain the trend include dietary patterns, psychological stress and adverse childhood experiences, and environmental factors such as endocrine-disrupting chemicals and air pollution.

“Continuing to investigate early menarche and its drivers is critical,” said corresponding author Zifan Wang, postdoctoral research fellow in Harvard Chan School’s Department of Environmental Health. “Early menarche is associated with higher risk of adverse health outcomes, such as cardiovascular disease and cancer. To address these health concerns – which our findings suggest may begin to impact more people, with disproportionate impact on already disadvantaged populations – we need much more investment in menstrual health research.”

The authors noted some limitations to the study, including that it relies heavily on retrospective self-reporting.

Source: Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health

Among Black Men, Study Finds Increased Mortality from Melanoma Diagnoses

Photo by Nsey Benajah on Unsplash

Melanoma is often detected later in people with darker skin complexions – and the consequences can be devastating, according to the results of a Mayo Clinic study published in the Journal of Surgical Oncology.

While melanoma may be found less frequently in people with darker complexions than fair ones, this aggressive form of skin cancer, accounting for 75% of all skin-cancer-related deaths, can strike anyone. The study, which consisted of 492 597 patients with melanoma, suggests that added vigilance in early screening is particularly needed for Black men, whose cancers are often found at later stages, leading to worse outcomes compared to white patients or Black women.

“We compared non-Hispanic Black patients to white patients and saw striking differences in how patients presented with the disease,” says surgical oncologist Tina Hieken, MD, senior author of the study and a researcher at Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Center. “We saw more extremity melanoma, and more later-stage disease.”

Extremity melanoma refers to skin cancer that can develop on the arms, legs, hands and feet. Various factors, including social risk factors and biological components, could be at play, but further research is needed to help determine why these differences exist.

Revealing differences in sex-based immune response

The research found that Black female patients with melanoma fared better than Black male patients. Men tended to be older at diagnosis and more likely to have cancer that had spread to their lymph nodes compared to women. This translated to worse survival rates: the five-year survival for Black men with stage 3 melanoma was only 42% chance, compared to 71% for Black women.

Most research on melanoma hasn’t focused on how race and sex affect outcomes and hasn’t looked at the influence of race and ethnicity across all groups. Dr Hieken says the study highlights the need to understand these differences better, noting that this is the first large study to confirm that sex-based differences in melanoma outcomes exist within the non-Hispanic Black population.

“When we talk about later-stage melanoma patients who are female versus male in that non-Hispanic Black patient cohort who ended up doing worse, some biological things may be going on here that are interesting,” says Dr Hieken.

One theory centres on variations in immune response.

“Several immune signals suggest that women may respond better to some immunotherapies than males,” says Dr Hieken.

Researchers note that more studies focused on melanoma in a broader range of people, including more Black participants in clinical trials, is key to bridging this knowledge gap and potentially identifying more effective treatments.

Healthcare professionals should screen carefully

Dr Hieken notes that this study is a wake-up call for everyone battling to diagnose and cure melanoma, regardless of the patient’s sex or skin tone.

She emphasises that healthcare professionals should carefully examine areas like palms, soles and under fingernails, where melanoma might be more challenging to spot on darker skin.

“We can incorporate screening for skin lesions or lesions under the nails into the visit for patients as part of their regular checkups,” says Dr Hieken. “What we want to do is elevate care for our patients.”

Source: Mayo Clinic

Black Adults Experience Less Cognitive Decline after Retirement

Photo by Barbara Olsen on Pexels

A study published in the Journal of the American Geriatrics Society found that immediately after retirement, white adults tended to experience a significant decline in cognitive function, whereas Black adults experienced minimal cognitive decline. White men showed the steepest post-retirement cognitive decline across sex/race combinations, whereas Black women showed the least decline.

White women performed better cognitively at retirement than other race/sex subgroups, and after retirement, their cognitive functioning declined at a rate that was slightly less than the average for this study. Results were adjusted for sociodemographics and physical and mental health indicators.

The study, which included 2226 US participants followed for up to 10 years, revealed greater post-retirement cognitive decline among individuals who attended college compared with those who did not.

“The results seem to point to the possibility that better job opportunities could lead to greater cognitive losses after retirement whereas exposure to lifelong structural inequalities may actually ease transition to retirement with respect to cognitive aging,” said lead author Ross Andel, PhD, of Arizona State University’s Edson College of Nursing and Health Innovation.

Source: Wiley

Genetic Variations Influence Drug Metabolism in Patients of African Descent

Photo by Agung Pandit Wiguna

Investigators have identified new genetic variations that affect gene expression in the liver cells of patients of African ancestry, findings that provide insight into how drugs are metabolised differently in different populations, according to a study published in The American Journal of Human Genetics.

Expression quantitative locus (eQTL) studies use an individual’s genomic and transcriptomic data to uncover unique genetic variants that regulate gene expression. However, people of African descent have not been well represented in these databases.

Having this comprehensive, multiomic data is key to uncovering the mechanisms that regulate an individual’s genome and understanding how different groups of people respond to drugs differently, which can improve treatment strategies, according to Minoli Perera, PharmD, PhD, associate professor of Pharmacology and senior author of the study.

“We don’t have data from any historically excluded populations to run these analyses, so a big motivation of my lab is to create data in African ancestry populations so that they are represented in multiomics,” said Perera.

In the current study, the investigators treated hepatocytes from liver tissue samples from African American patients with six FDA approved drugs: Rifampin, Phenytoin, Carbamazepine, Dexamethasone, Phenobarbital and Omeprazole.

The investigators then performed whole-genome genotyping and RNA sequencing on primary hepatocytes treated both with and without the drugs. They also mapped eQTLs, or single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) affecting gene expression, in the liver cells.

From this comprehensive analysis, they uncovered varying transcriptional changes in the cell lines across the different drug treatments and identified NRF2 as a potential gene transcription regulator.

“NRF2 has been already identified as a very important transcription factor for drug metabolism, but this is a much more comprehensive way to look at it,” Perera said.

The investigators also discovered nearly 3000 genetic variants that affect how well hepatocytes respond to external stimuli, including drugs, which the investigators called drug response eQTLs, or reQTLs. Notably, they discovered reQTLs for drug-metabolising genes such as CYP3A5.

Most individuals of European ancestry carry a specific genetic variant in CYP3A5 which results in no/low CYP3A5 enzyme, whereas individuals of African ancestry carry that variant at a lower frequency. According to Perera, this is a problem because most participants that are recruited for clinical trials are of European ancestry, and the findings from these trials directly inform how often and how much of a drug should be prescribed to all patients, regardless of their ancestry.

“When you test drugs in a group of people with limited diversity, and then say this is the dose, this is how fast it’s metabolised, this is how often you dose the drug and then you give this medication to the entire U.S. population, we don’t know for sure how accurate those measures are, and that’s just with one variant. Other variants that may influence how much or how little we up-regulate these important enzymes,” Perera said.

Perera said her team is now expanding their work by increasing the number of hepatocytes from African American participants they’re studying and incorporating other types of omics techniques, such as epigenetic profiling.

“Almost exclusively we’ve done epigenetic screenings in European populations, so what can we find in the epigenome that’s important for African Americans. Also, because there’s more genetic variation in individuals of African descent, would that change the epigenome in ways that we aren’t able to see in Europeans,” Perera said. “We hope that what we’re doing can help annotate new studies coming along for African ancestry populations.”

Source: Northwestern University

Increasing Age Blunts the Strength of Certain Stroke Risk Factors

Photo by CDC on Unsplash

Hypertension and diabetes are known risk factors for stroke, but now a new study shows that the amount of risk may decrease as people age. The study is published in Neurology.

“High blood pressure and diabetes are two important risk factors for stroke that can be managed by medication, decreasing a person’s risk,” said study author George Howard, DrPH, of the University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Public Health. “Our findings show that their association with stroke risk may be substantially less at older ages, yet other risk factors do not change with age. These differences in risk factors imply that determining whether a person is at high risk for stroke may differ depending on their age.”

The study involved 28 235 people who had never had a stroke and were followed for 11 years. Risk factors included hypertension, diabetes, smoking, atrial fibrillation, heart disease and left ventricular hypertrophy. Because of the well-known higher stroke risk in Black people (comprising 41% of participants), race was also considered as part of the assessed risk factors, Howard added.

Researchers followed up with participants every six months, confirming strokes by reviewing medical records.

During the study, there were 1405 strokes over 276 074 person-years. Participants were divided into three age groups. The age ranges for those groups varied slightly depending on the data being analysed by researchers. In general, the younger group included participants ages 45–69, the middle group included people in their late 60s to 70s and the older group included people 74 and older.

Researchers found that people with diabetes in the younger age group were approximately twice as likely to have a stroke as people of similar age who did not have diabetes, while people with diabetes in the older age group had an approximately 30% higher risk of having a stroke than people of similar older age who did not have diabetes.

Researchers also found that people with high blood pressure in the younger age group had an 80% higher risk of having stroke than people of similar age without high blood pressure while that risk went down to 50% for people with high blood pressure in the older age group compared to people of similar age without high blood pressure.

With race/ethnicity as a risk factor, Black participants in the younger age group compared to White participants in that group, a difference which decreased in the older age group. For stroke risk factors such as smoking, atrial fibrillation and left ventricular hypertrophy, researchers did not find an age-related change in risk.

“It is important to note that our results do not suggest that treatment of high blood pressure and diabetes becomes unimportant in older age,” said Howard. “Such treatments are still very important for a person’s health. But it also may be wise for doctors to focus on managing risk factors such as atrial fibrillation, smoking and left ventricular hypertrophy as people age.”

Howard also noted that even where the impact of risk factors decreases with age, the total number of people with strokes at older ages may still be larger since overall risk of stroke increases with age. For example, in the younger age group for hypertension, researchers estimate that about 2.0% of normotensive people had a stroke, compared to 3.6% of hypertensive people. In the older age group, about 6.2% of normotensive people had a stroke, compared to 9.3% of hypertensive people.

A limitation of the research was that participants’ risk factors were assessed only once at the start of the study, and it’s possible they may have changed over time.

Source: American Academy of Neurology 

Towards Larger, More Representative Lung Cancer Clinical Trials

Source: NCI

Filling clinical trials and enrolling sufficiently diverse, representative groups of patients, has long been a challenge, partly due to stringent participation guidelines. In an effort to attain larger and more diverse trial groups, an international team of researchers and policymakers has written new recommendations on how to determine eligibility criteria for lung cancer clinical trials.

The group was led in part by David Gerber, MD, along with representatives from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), National Cancer Institute, European Medicines Agency, pharmaceutical companies, and the LUNGevity Foundation.

The recommendations, published today in JAMA Oncology, offer the first publicly available outline of upcoming FDA draft guidance on lung cancer clinical trials that are expected to make it easier to include more patients.

“This paper is the public’s first look at the FDA’s proposed changes to how we determine who can participate in a lung cancer clinical trial,” said Professor Gerber in the Hematology/Oncology Division at UTSW. “If these changes are successful, they could make clinical trials for lung cancer as well as other cancers more powerful and more representative.”

Ensuring that people from diverse backgrounds join clinical trials is key to properly evaluating how a new treatment will work among patients of all races and ethnicities. But today, only about 5% of all cancer patients enrol in a clinical trial, and only 11% of cancer clinical trial participants identify as a racial or ethnic minority.

For patients with cancer, participation in clinical trials requires not just a decision to try an experimental treatment, but time and energy spent understanding the trial, enrolling in it, and often attending extra testing or clinic appointments. Many researchers agree that complicated, inconsistent, poorly explained, and overly strict eligibility requirements to join a cancer clinical trial exacerbate this problem and are a key reason for the low number of underrepresented minorities in clinical trials.

“So many clinical trials never finish enrollment, close prematurely, or don’t recruit a population that lets researchers generalise the results,” Dr. Gerber said. “I think there’s widespread recognition that eligibility criteria have become too stringent.”

Addressing this for one cancer subtype, advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), – the LUNGevity Foundation convened a roundtable discussion with experts from academia, industry, and regulatory bodies. The team assembled a prioritised list of eligibility categories that should be included in the descriptions of all NSCLC clinical trials and recommended criteria for each category. Some suggestions were more lenient than what has typically been included in previous NSCLC trial eligibility criteria; for instance, the team recommended that most patients with prior or concurrent cancers, most patients with brain metastases, and most patients with mild liver impairment – all of whom would likely have been excluded in the past – still be included in trials.

The team also suggested that these categories be clearly laid out on public websites advertising clinical trials in an easily searchable format.

The FDA will be releasing draft guidance on NSCLC clinical trials in the near future and hold a public comment period before finalising them. Other interdisciplinary teams have already convened to standardise eligibility requirements for clinical trials of other cancer types.

If the new guidelines prove effective, Prof Gerber said that clinical trials will likely be easier to fill and provide more complete and timely data on new cancer interventions.

“If you can involve more patients in clinical trials, you’re more likely to complete those trials quickly. That’s going to lead to new treatments faster,” he said.

Source: UT Southwestern Medical Center