Allmed Healthcare Professionals, a leading healthcare agency, has launched its innovative Pay Slip App, designed to provide convenience and efficiency to its valued staff. The app, available for both Android and iPhone devices, revolutionises the pay slip distribution process, eliminating the need for staff to physically visit the office.
The development of the Pay Slip App began in January 2022 with the vision of addressing the challenges staff faced while collecting their pay slips. “We saw that our staff were spending time and money to come to our offices, which led to inefficiencies and unnecessary expenses,” explained Zukisani Sirwaxa, Operations Manager at Allmed. “Our goal was to save costs, improve accessibility, and streamline the entire process for our staff.”
The user-friendly app allows staff to access all their pay slips since they started working for Allmed, aiding them in financial planning and loan applications. Staff can easily check their pay details, including overtime, leaves, and earnings for specific shifts. This real-time access empowers staff to proactively manage their finances.
Karishma Dayaram, Business Unit Manager at Allmed, highlighted the app’s broader benefits, saying, “The Pay Slip App not only saves costs in printing and delivery but also frees up valuable staff time that was previously spent on manual processes. It enhances transparency and empowers our staff with immediate access to their essential pay information.”
Donald McMillan, Managing Director of Allmed, shared his excitement about the app’s unique features, stating, “As one of the first agencies to introduce such a dedicated Pay Slip App, we have been at the forefront of technology adoption in the industry. We are continuously exploring ways to improve the app’s functionality to meet our staff’s evolving needs.”
The Pay Slip App, developed in collaboration with a third-party developer, underwent a rigorous testing phase to ensure its efficiency and reliability. Since its launch, the app has received several thousand downloads, and Allmed has been proactive in addressing any technical challenges to ensure a seamless user experience.
Looking towards the future, Allmed envisions expanding the app’s functionalities to provide enhanced communication with our staff. “We are exploring the possibility of using the platform to share important updates, memos, and notices directly with our staff,” said Zukisani Sirwaxa. “This will further streamline our communication and foster a dynamic and connected community.”
As a forward-thinking company, Allmed recognises the importance of environmental responsibility. “We are also proud to align ourselves with the green initiative,” stated Donald McMillan. “By embracing digital solutions like the Pay Slip App, we are reducing paper usage and contributing to a sustainable future.”
A study of healthcare workers (HCW) found that those who picked their nose were more likely to get COVID than the people who refrained from such explorations. The Dutch researchers published their probing results in the journal PLOS One.
In the early stages of the COVID pandemic, researchers noted a wide range of efforts to prevent the spread of SARS-CoV-2, such as the wearing of personal protective equipment and maintaining social distancing, especially in the hospital setting. Much research went into the impacts of, eg, wearing glasses on the effectiveness of masking, but little if any attention was paid to a widespread but secretive habit.
Sikkens and colleagues retrospectively surveyed healthcare workers at Amsterdam University Medical Centers were in December 2021 about their behaviours during the first and second waves of the pandemic. They matched these responses were matched against prospectively collected COVID test results at the hospitals from March to October 2020. The nose pickers were nearly three times more likely to catch COVID (17.3% vs 5.9%) than those who refrained at all costs. Surprising results were found for those HCWs who owned up to the habit.
Secret nose pickers can take some comfort in that 85% of the cohort admitted that they picked their nose either daily, weekly, or monthly, and nose pickers tended to be younger. More men picked their nose (90%) than women (83%), and doctors were the most likely to be among the nose-picking offenders: 100% of residents admitted to it, along with 91% of specialists.
Sikkens et al. noted that one limitation of the study was that nose pickers were not asked about “the depth of penetration and eating of boogers”.
Other behaviours such nail biting, having a beard were not associated with COVID infection, nor was wearing glasses, though it showed a relevant trend. Interestingly, nose picking frequency was not linked to difference in COVID infection risk; 27% of those who reported monthly picking, 35% among weekly pickers, and 32% of daily pickers.
Frequency of nose picking did not appear to be linked with any difference in COVID infection risk, with positive cases in 27% of those who reported monthly picking, 35% among weekly pickers, and 32% of daily pickers. No participants reported picking their nose every hour, thankfully.
One-third of the cohort reported nail biting, two-thirds wore glasses, and 31% of the men had beards.
A study strength was that SARS-CoV-2 positivity was determined by prospective longitudinal serological sampling, though this may not be generalisable to the current era of vaccines and circulating Omicron variants. The retrospective nature of the survey may have introduced recall bias.
Sikken et al. noted that it is surprising that SARS-CoV-2 transmission routes had been so thoroughly researched, yet simple behaviours had been overlooked. “Possibly this sensitive subject is still taboo in the health care profession. It is commendable we assume HCWs to not portray bad habits, yet we too are only human after all, as illustrated by the pivotal proportion of nose pickers in our cohort (84.5%).”
Acinetobacter baumannii is a notorious hospital pathogen, and there is great pressure to devise novel therapeutic approaches to combat this growing threat. German researchers have now detected an unexpectedly wide diversity of certain cell appendages known as pili in A. baumannii that are associated with pathogenicity. This finding, published in PLOS Genetics, could lead to treatment strategies that are specifically tailored to a particular pathogen.
Each year, over 670 000 people in Europe fall ill because of antibiotic-resistant pathogens, and 33 000 die from the infections. Especially feared are pathogens with resistances against multiple, or even all, known antibiotics. One of these is the bacterium Acinetobacter baumannii, feared today above all as the “hospital superbug”: According to estimates, up to five percent of all hospital-acquired and one tenth of all bacterial infections resulting in death can be attributed to this pathogen alone. This puts A. baumannii right at the top of WHO’s list of pathogens for which there is an urgent need to develop new therapies.
Understanding which characteristics make A. baumannii a pathogen is one of the prerequisites for this. To this end, bioinformaticians led by Professor Ingo Ebersberger of Goethe University Frankfurt and the LOEWE Center for Translational Biodiversity Genomics (LOEWE-TBG) are comparing the genomes and the proteins encoded therein across a wide range of different Acinetobacter strains. Conclusions about which genes contribute to pathogenicity can be drawn above all from the differences between dangerous and harmless strains.
Due to a lack of suitable methods, corresponding studies have so far concentrated on whether a gene is present in a bacterial strain or not. However, this neglects the fact that bacteria can acquire new characteristics by modifying existing genes and thus also the proteins encoded by them. That is why Ebersberger’s team has developed a bioinformatics method to track the modification of proteins along an evolutionary lineage and has now applied this method for the first time to Acinetobacter in collaboration with microbiologists from the Institute for Molecular Biosciences and the Institute of Medical Microbiology and Infection Control at Goethe University Frankfurt.
In the process, the researchers concentrated on hair-like cell appendages, known as type IVa (T4A) pili, which are prevalent in bacteria and that they use to interact with their environment. The fact that they are present in harmless bacteria on the one hand and have even been identified as a key factor for the virulence of some pathogens on the other suggests that the T4A pili have repeatedly acquired new characteristics associated with pathogenicity during evolution.
The research team could show that the protein ComC, which sits on the tip of the T4A pili and is essential for their function, shows conspicuous changes within the group of pathogenic Acinetobacter strains. Even different strains of A. baumannii have different variants of this protein. This leads bioinformatician Ebersberger to compare the T4A pili to a multifunctional garden tool, where the handle is always the same, but the attachments are interchangeable. “In this way, drastic functional modifications can be achieved over short evolutionary time spans,” Ebersberger is convinced. “We assume that bacterial strains that differ in terms of their T4A pili also interact differently with their environment. This might determine, for example, in which corner of the human body the pathogen settles.”
The aim is to use this knowledge of the unexpectedly high diversity within the pathogen to improve the treatment of A. baumannii infections, as Ebersberger explains: “Building on our results, it might be possible to develop personalised therapies that are tailored to a specific strain of the pathogen.” However, the study by Ebersberger and his colleagues also reveals something else: Previous studies on the comparative genomics of A. baumannii have presumably only unveiled the tip of the iceberg. “Our approach has gone a long way towards resolving the search for possible components that characterize pathogens,” says Ebersberger.
Following reports of healthcare workers who have been bitten, punched, hit in the face, robbed, assaulted, or even killed in healthcare facilities in Gauteng, the province’s health department announced that healthcare workers will now be trained in handling patients who become violent.
The initiative was recently announced by Motalatale Modiba, spokesperson for the Gauteng Department of Health, on social media.
A lack of security at public healthcare facilities is not a new problem. A previous series of Spotlight articles highlighted security challenges in public health facilities in several provinces – including Gauteng – and reports of robberies and assaults at some facilities. Last year, there was a fatal shooting of a nurse at Tembisa Hospital which sparked an outcry among health worker unions over the safety of their members.
The departments’ announcement prompted questions by organised labour and an opposition politician about whether the authorities have lost trust in the multi-million rand security measures already in place in health facilities to protect both workers and patients, with some arguing that security guards, rather than healthcare workers, should be responsible for safety.
However, according to Modiba, the training of staff has nothing to do with the security contracts of security companies.
“Security personnel are non-medical personnel, therefore, their presence in facilities does not substitute the need to ensure that our staff is empowered with techniques to know how to handle difficult patients,” he told Spotlight.
‘Just a tick-box exercise’
The training plans, however, have inspired little confidence among healthcare workers.
According to the nurses’ union Denosa’s Gauteng Provincial Secretary, Bongani Mazibuko, the training does not address the safety concerns that exist in the facilities. “It’s just a tick-box exercise to say the employer is trying to do something. The root cause of these attacks is the influx of mental health patients and the mixing of mental health patients with medical patients,” he told Spotlight.
The department in a statement in April said many of the incidents were reported at Weskoppies Psychiatric Hospital with 21 cases since January last year. At Carletonville Hospital there were nine safety incidents, nine incidents at the Far East Rand Hospital, seven at Chris Hani Baragwanath Academic Hospital, four at Thelle Mogoerane Hospital, and three at Kopanong Hospital. There were also reports of some isolated incidents at other facilities.
Mazibuko said that from the reports they received from their members working in Gauteng public health facilities, the training has also not yet taken place. “We would like the department to tell us which institutions they have provided the training to so that we can confirm with our members if they received the training or not.”
Modiba, however, did not respond to Spotlight’s questions about where training had taken place so far, how many healthcare workers have been trained, or the impact this is having.
Explaining aspects of the plan, however, Modiba said that the department training staff to know how to protect themselves is a practical step that shows that they are conscious of the environment they operate in. According to him, training on how to manage a violent mental healthcare user is generic to the training of doctors and psychiatric nurses as regulated by the Health Professions Council of South Africa, which is a statutory body established in terms of the Health Professions Act. “A special course on management of violent mental healthcare users is planned to be rolled out from the second quarter of the 2023-2024 financial year. It is based on a similar course attended by one of the healthcare workers in the UK. He will be working in one of our Specialist Psychiatric hospitals, Sterkfontein Hospital. He will be the main facilitator and will be working with other employees from the Regional Training Centres, the Office of Health Standards Compliance (OHSC), and Wellness Practitioners,” said Modiba. He said the department is also working with the police.
But Mazibuko said Denosa has had many talks with the department on healthcare workers’ safety concerns and the need to create a safe working environment. “This was part of our demands when we marched last year. Even on International Nurses Day, we were vocal about our concerns about the safety of our members at the workplace.”
He said the union had previously presented its safety campaign to the department.
SAMA ‘deeply concerned’
Meanwhile, following a scoping review study, the South African Medical Association (SAMA) recently published a report outlining the nature and extent of violence against healthcare workers between 2012 and 2022. The study found an increase in violent acts targeting healthcare workers, with the most affected being doctors, nurses, and paramedics. The study found that female healthcare workers were disproportionately affected compared to their male counterparts and most of the incidents were reported in Gauteng.
In an interview with Spotlight, SAMA Chairperson Dr Mvuyisi Mzukwa said they are “deeply concerned” about the safety of healthcare professionals. He said they appreciate efforts that can realistically improve the safety of healthcare workers in the workplace.
“SAMA has shared an interim report [based on the study findings] on violence targeting healthcare workers with DENOSA and the media. This report was designed to sensitise all stakeholders about crime targeting healthcare workers and to prime the stakeholders, including the National Department of Health, to initiate intersectoral solutions to limit and prevent safety threats in the workplace against all healthcare workers in the country,” Mzukwa said.
SAMA’s report found eight murders of healthcare workers reported in the media, “with six of the deaths (or 75%) occurring among doctors”. One nurse and one paramedic were also murdered in the set period the report found. “Of all the 45 media reports examined, only 17 arrests (38%) were reported, with only two resulting in successful prosecution.”
According to Mzukwa, SAMA had recommended that a multi-sectorial strategy for the security of healthcare workers to protect them from targeted crime be developed and implemented.
“Without this intervention, healthcare in itself continues being further jeopardised and more doctors will feel threatened and seek safer refuge in foreign countries, taking with them critical skills and expertise that are in dire need locally. Law enforcement agencies should also act swiftly in dealing with crime and to ensure the safety of both patients and healthcare providers,” Mzukwa said.
61 safety incidents
Speaking in the Gauteng Legislature in April, MEC for Health and Wellness, Nomantu Nkomo-Ralehoko said there were 61 incidents reported in health facilities between January 2022 and April 2023. She told MPLs that most of these incidents were attributed to mental healthcare users, while others relate to patients’ anger towards staff for various reasons, such as refusal to buy them items or patients trying to escape, as well as angry relatives and patients linked to criminal activities.
Nkomo-Ralehoko said that staff training in responding to aggression and violence in the affected institutions is one element of their intervention. She said the department will be installing CCTV cameras at strategic locations for monitoring purposes.
“Our goal is to minimise – if not eradicate – such incidents in our facilities. We have to work with healthcare workers and other stakeholders such as hospital boards, clinic committees, and the patients themselves to curb incidents of attacks inside our facilities,” she said.
But security concerns in Gauteng’s public health facilities are also fuelled by systemic and contract management issues – something the MEC vowed to address. In March, responding to concerns over these multi-million rand security contracts that are rolled over year on year without a proper tender, Nkomo-Ralehoko acknowledged that the situation is unacceptable. The department is spending over R59 million on month-to-month security contracts at its facilities.
“The security contracts are rolled over irregularly as there is currently no contract in place; only service level agreements are used to manage the contracts,” she said.
Responding to a question from Spotlight on the progress with the new security tender, Modiba said that the tender was advertised and has since closed. “The evaluation committee has been appointed and will now go through the evaluation process to assess the various bids that have been received. We are still on course to complete the process within this financial year,” Modiba said.
But according to Denosa’s Mazibuko, in-sourcing security services, separating mental health patients from other patients, and ensuring that mental health patients are only admitted to where the institutions can commit them, will help the department and the healthcare workers work in a safe space.
He said that the fact that there have been years of year-on-year security contracts, shows that the department is not in touch with the challenges on the ground. “In-sourcing of security will help as well since it will address the issue of security withholding their services as they have not been paid and security being given proper gear for work,” he said.
According to Jack Bloom, the Democratic Alliance’s health spokesperson in Gauteng, the department is failing in its basic responsibility to provide a safe working environment for staff and patients in public hospitals.
“A huge amount of money is spent on security companies that don’t do their job, and it is high time that new security contracts are awarded to competent providers,” he said.
Bloom said that healthcare providers should not have to defend themselves against attacks because that is what security guards are supposed to do. “There needs to be a complete overhaul of security arrangements at our hospitals, with a professional assessment of what should be provided at a reasonable cost,” he said.
Private equity ownership of healthcare services such as nursing homes and hospitals is associated with harmful impacts on costs and quality of care, suggests a review of the latest evidence published by The BMJ. No consistently beneficial impacts of private equity ownership were identified, and the researchers say these results confirm the need for more research on private equity ownership in healthcare and possibly increased regulation.
Private equity firms use capital from wealthy individuals and large institutional investors to buy companies, and, after a relatively brief period of ownership, sell them for substantial returns. Over the past decade, private equity firms have increasingly invested in, acquired, and consolidated healthcare facilities, with global healthcare buyouts exceeding $200bn since 2021 alone. But despite much speculation, it’s still not clear what impact private equity ownership of healthcare operators has on costs, quality of care, and health outcomes.
To address this uncertainty, researchers analysed the results of 55 studies (47 focused exclusively on the US) published in peer reviewed journals in the past two decades.
Nursing homes were the most commonly studied settings, followed by hospitals and dermatology facilities. The studies were designed differently, and were of varying quality, but the researchers were able to allow for that in their analysis.
Nine of 12 studies showed higher costs to patients or payers at health facilities owned by private equity firms (harmful impact), three found no differences, and none showed lower costs (beneficial impact).
Private equity ownership was also associated with mixed to harmful impacts on quality. Of 27 studies that assessed healthcare quality, 12 found harmful impacts, three found beneficial impacts, nine found mixed impacts (some quality measures declined, some improved), and in three the results were neutral.
Health outcomes showed both beneficial and harmful results, as did costs to operators, but the volume of studies for these outcomes was too low for any definitive conclusions to be drawn.
When nursing homes were analysed separately, private equity ownership often had mixed impacts on quality, but the researchers point out that more evidence suggests a degradation rather than an improvement in quality, such as a decrease in nurse staffing or a shift to lower nursing skill mix.
The researchers acknowledge that they did not differentiate between different types of private equity investment and ownership, and were unable to assess larger possible impacts of private equity on access to care. And because most of the included studies occurred in the US, the impacts identified may not apply to all global settings.
Nevertheless, they say this study fills a gap in the current literature on private equity ownership in healthcare, and presents emergent patterns related to private equity ownership that other studies have been unable to synthesise.
As such, they say: “The results of this study confirm the need for increased rigorous research on private equity ownership in healthcare, particularly its impacts on health outcomes and system costs and in other non-US settings, such as Europe.”
“This said, the current body of evidence is robust enough to confirm that private equity ownership is a consequential and increasingly prominent element in healthcare, warranting surveillance, reporting, and possibly increased regulation.”
The Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital (CMJAH) would like to dismiss the misleading information shared by Mr Jack Bloom regarding cancelled operations.
CMJAH would like to put it on record that there were no “more than 50 elective cases cancelled due to the cold weather conditions”. The statement by Mr Bloom creates the impression that all elective cases were cancelled, which is not true.
There were 53 operations scheduled for Monday, 10 July 2023, and 26 cases were done, while only 15 were cancelled due to low temperatures at theatres and 12 were cancelled for reasons not related to low temperatures.
Out of the 15 cancelled cases, 3 were for Thoracic, 6 were for Trauma Orthopaedic, 2 were for Paeds Orthopaedic, 1 was for Paeds plastics, and 3 were for Ear, Nose, & Throat.
The problem of temperature control has been a challenge for the facility for years, but it became worse in the last two years due to the copper theft which took place during the period when the facility was evacuated for months after the fire incident. This affected the central heating system of the facility, which regulates the level of acceptable temperatures in the entire hospital, but mostly in the theatres.
To remedy the situation, the process of installing Schedule 40 pipes, which are less susceptible to theft as they do not have an attractive market value as copper does, has started. During the installation process, the theatres and intensive care units (ICU) were prioritised. From the date of appointment, 28 June 2023, to date, the contractor has completed the installation of schedule 40 pipes for Blocks 2, 3 and 4. The installation process at Block 5 has already started and the work is progressing well, ahead of schedule.
The water system is currently running, with close monitoring, at all three blocks where the schedule 40 pipes were installed to check for any possible leaks as the system has not been running for the past two years.
The facility would like to apologise to the public for any inconvenience this might have caused. The installation of the schedule 40 pipes is a necessary project that would address the issue of copper theft and the central heating system.
The facility would further like to assure the public that this matter is getting the urgency it deserves, and cancelled cases are being attended to.
Staff, including nurses, at RK Khan Hospital in Chatsworth, Durban, picketed on Wednesday over poor working conditions at the facility. Photo: Tsoanelo Sefoloko
Nurses, administration staff and general workers brought parts of RK Khan Hospital in Chatsworth, Durban, to a standstill for about an hour on Wednesday. They protested outside the hospital to highlight what they say are poor working conditions.
Protesting nurses say they are forced to perform cleaning duties in addition to patient care because the hospital has not employed enough cleaners. Other workers complained of staff shortages in the administration and general units.
Workers say they met with the management in February. Union leaders had asked the facility to commit to resolving their complaints.
Nurse Zizakele Ndlovu said they were told by the union leaders that working conditions would improve. But nothing changed, she said.
“The conditions we work under at the hospital are not good. We end up having to work more hours, and we don’t get paid for overtime. Sometimes I even work as a clerk,” she said.
“The department treats us as if we don’t know our job, and we don’t deserve what we are asking for. We lost many workers to Covid; some retired and others resigned. Those vacancies have not been filled. Even at top management there are lots of vacancies and this leads to poor service.”
Chairperson at the hospital of the National Education, Health and Allied and Workers’ Union (NEHAWU) David Mpongose said they had engaged management and had been promised that the situation would improve.
“Our bosses are arrogant. They really don’t take us seriously. Each time they make empty promises, so we decided to protest for the provincial government to assist us,” said Mpongose.
Xolani Mnguni, a cleaner, said he earned R7800 per month under the hospital’s previous contractor, but now only earns R3000 under the current contractor. He also said he has to do jobs other than cleaning.
Hospital CEO Linda Sobekwa accepted the workers’ memorandum and signed it on behalf of the provincial health department. She promised to ensure that the department responded within ten days as requested.
Agiza Hlongwane, spokesperson for the KwaZulu-Natal Department of Health, said officials would consider the workers’ demands and respond to them.
Advancements in AI have resulted in typically human characteristics like creativity, communication, critical thinking, and learning being replicated by machines for complex tasks like driving vehicles and creating art. With further development, these human-like attributes may develop enough to one day make it possible for robots and AI to be entrusted with nursing, a very ‘human’ practice. But… would it be ethical to entrust the care of humans to machines?
In a step toward answering this question, Japanese researchers recently explored the ethics of such a situation in the journal Nursing Ethics.
The study was conducted by Associate Professor Tomohide Ibuki from Tokyo University of Science, in collaboration with medical ethics researcher Dr Eisuke Nakazawa from The University of Tokyo and nursing researcher Dr Ai Ibuki from Kyoritsu Women’s University.
“This study in applied ethics examines whether robotics, human engineering, and human intelligence technologies can and should replace humans in nursing tasks,” says Dr Ibuki.
Nurses show empathy and establish meaningful connections with their patients, a human touch which is essential in fostering a sense of understanding, trust, and emotional support. The researchers examined whether the current advancements in robotics and AI can implement these human qualities by replicating the ethical concepts attributed to human nurses, including advocacy, accountability, cooperation, and caring.
Advocacy in nursing involves speaking on behalf of patients to ensure that they receive the best possible medical care. This encompasses safeguarding patients from medical errors, providing treatment information, acknowledging the preferences of a patient, and acting as mediators between the hospital and the patient. In this regard, the researchers noted that while AI can inform patients about medical errors and present treatment options, they questioned its ability to truly understand and empathise with patients’ values and to effectively navigate human relationships as mediators.
The researchers also expressed concerns about holding robots accountable for their actions. They suggested the development of explainable AI, which would provide insights into the decision-making process of AI systems, improving accountability.
The study further highlights that nurses are required to collaborate effectively with their colleagues and other healthcare professionals to ensure the best possible care for patients. As humans rely on visual cues to build trust and establish relationships, unfamiliarity with robots might lead to suboptimal interactions. Recognising this issue, the researchers emphasised the importance of conducting further investigations to determine the appropriate appearance of robots for facilitating efficient cooperation with human medical staff.
Lastly, while robots and AI have the potential to understand a patient’s emotions and provide appropriate care, the patient must also be willing to accept robots as care providers.
Having considered the above four ethical concepts in nursing, the researchers acknowledge that while robots may not fully replace human nurses anytime soon, they do not dismiss the possibility. While robots and AI can potentially reduce the shortage of nurses and improve treatment outcomes for patients, their deployment requires careful weighing of the ethical implications and impact on nursing practice.
“While the present analysis does not preclude the possibility of implementing the ethical concepts of nursing in robots and AI in the future, it points out that there are several ethical questions. Further research could not only help solve them but also lead to new discoveries in ethics,” concludes Dr Ibuki.
A unique collaborative study on hospital clinician wellbeing by teams at 60 of the best US hospitals, was published in JAMA Health Forum. The study found that physicians and nurses, even at hospitals known to be good places to work, experienced adverse outcomes during the pandemic and want hospital management to make significant improvements in their work environments and in patient safety.
The solutions to high hospital clinician burnout and turnover, they say, are not resilience training for clinicians to better cope with adverse working conditions but organisational improvements that provide safe workloads and better work-life balance.
Researchers sought information in 2021 from 21 050 physicians and registered nurses practicing in 60 Magnet recognised hospitals in 22 states. Forty-seven percent of nurses and 32% of physicians experienced high burnout. Twenty-three percent of physicians and 40% of nurses said they would leave their jobs if possible. Less than 10% of physicians and nurses reported experiencing joy in their work.
Many clinicians are downright hostile to programmes – like resilience training – that are designed to adapt them to poor work conditions; clinicians want the working conditions improved.
Linda H Aiken, PhD, study lead author
Not having enough nurses to care for patients, having little control over workloads, lack of confidence in management to resolve problems in patient care, and concerns about patient safety were all associated with higher burnout, job dissatisfaction, and intent to leave among both nurses and physicians.
Lead author Linda H Aiken, PhD, at the University of Pennsylvania said, “Physicians and nurses largely agree about what hospital management could do to address their burnout, job dissatisfaction, and plans to leave their current jobs; they want improved staffing, modern working conditions in which they can spend more time in direct patient care, greater control over their workloads and work schedules, and a higher priority on patient safety.”
Eighty-seven percent of nurses and 45% of physicians said improving nurse staffing was very important to their own mental health and wellbeing. Other high priorities for clinicians were health breaks without interruption and reduced time spent on documentation. Aiken added, “Many clinicians are downright hostile to programmes – like resilience training – that are designed to adapt them to poor work conditions; clinicians want the working conditions improved.”
Clinicians are concerned about quality and safety of care. Half of physicians and nurses lack confidence that their patients can safely manage their care after discharge highlighting the need for improvement in discharge planning. Patient safety remains a concern with 26% of nurses and 12% of physicians giving their own hospitals an unfavorable patient safety grade. Thirty-nine percent of nurses and 33% of physicians feel mistakes are held against them contrary to recommendations of the National Academy of Medicine to search for and correct system deficiencies that cause most medical errors.
The study was carried out by Penn Nursing’s Center for Health Outcomes and Policy Research in collaboration with the US Clinician Wellbeing Study Consortium composed of 60 Magnet Hospitals. The study took place in 2021 during the COVID pandemic, a time when all US hospitals were severely challenged. Previous research shows that clinicians in hospitals with better work environments prior to the pandemic had better outcomes during the pandemic. The Consortium committed to this study to learn from their experiences during the pandemic how to sustain and further improve their favourable work environments to better withstand external threats and to rebound rapidly.
Researchers assisting microbiologists in Ukraine have found an extremely high level of bacterial resistance among the war-wounded patients treated in hospitals. The study, recently published in The Lancet Infectious Diseases, found resistance in many hospital-acquired infections stemming from damaged and overwhelmed healthcare infrastructure, with many samples resistant to the last-resort antibiotic colistin.
“I am quite thick-skinned and have witnessed numerous situations involving patients and bacteria. However, I must admit that I have never encountered bacteria as resistant as this before,” says Kristian Riesbeck, professor of Clinical Bacteriology at Lund University in Sweden.
There was never any doubt about helping out when Dr Oleksandr Nazarchuk, a microbiologist at a university in Vinnytsia, Ukraine, got in touch, says Kristian Riesbeck. Help was needed in Ukraine to assess the extent of antibiotic resistance in bacteria among severely injured patients in hospital.
In addition to all the human suffering caused by the war in Ukraine, another battle is being fought — an invisible war against resistant bacteria. This became evident when Kristian Riesbeck and his research colleagues analysed patient samples from seriously wounded patients, many of whom had burn injuries, in Ukraine. The patients had acquired infections while in hospital, primarily due to the overwhelmed wards and destroyed infrastructure.
Samples were collected from a total of 141 war victims, 133 adults who sustained injures during the war and eight infants diagnosed with pneumonia. These patients were admitted to three different hospitals in Ukraine, where they received emergency surgeries and intensive care to address their conditions.
“We observed that several the Gram-negative bacteria exhibited resistance to broad-spectrum antimicrobial agents, including newly developed enzyme-inhibiting antibiotics that are not yet available in the market. Moreover, nearly ten per cent of the samples contained bacteria that demonstrated resistance even to our ‘last-resort’ antibiotic, colistin. While we have encountered similar cases in India and China before, nothing compares to the extent of resistance observed in this study. As much as six per cent of all the samples contained bacteria resistant to every antibiotic we tested,” says Kristian Riesbeck.
He emphasizes that this clearly highlights the challenges posed by resistant bacteria in times of war. In particular, Kristian Riesbeck expresses concern regarding the resistance displayed by Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteria, as they have the potential to cause illness in individuals with a healthy and well-functioning immune system.
“This makes me very worried. It’s rare to encounter Klebsiella with such high levels of resistance, and it was not what we anticipated. While isolated cases have been documented in China, the magnitude of this situation surpasses anything we have seen before. While many countries are providing military aid and resources to Ukraine, it is equally crucial to assist them in addressing this ongoing situation. There is an evident risk of further spread of resistant bacteria, and this threatens the entire European region,” remarks Kristian Riesbeck.
