Category: Healthcare Politics and Regulations

Striking Eastern Cape Paramedics Face Dismissal

Photo by Camilo Jimenez on Unsplash

The Eastern Cape Department of Health has served more than 200 paramedics with letters of intention to dismiss them for embarking on a strike.

Long-standing problems with access to ambulances in parts of the Eastern Cape have worsened over the last three weeks as paramedics have stopped work in Buffalo City Municipality, Amahlathi and Raymond Mhlaba Local Municipality. The paramedics are demanding fully equipped ambulances, with valid licence discs, and cellphones. 

They want electrocardiography (ECG ) monitors, batteries, spine boards, blankets, head blocks, cervical collars, and baby cribs.

The workers are members of the National Education, Health and Allied Workers’ Union (NEHAWU) which maintains that the paramedics are not on strike but are exercising their right to safety at work. The paramedics come to work everyday in full uniform and wait at their work places until their shifts are over.

One of the workers, who has been a paramedic for six years, told GroundUp: “The service we offer to the public is very poor. Our ambulances have no equipment. There are no machines to check diabetes and high blood pressure. Our radios don’t function because we work in deep rural areas where there is a network problem. We use our cellphones to respond to the calls and communicate with our control room.”

“These issues have been raised for many years with the department but it has always been empty promises. If we transport a patient in an ambulance which is not fully equipped the department shifts the blame on us if something wrong happens to the patient. We are not on strike, because we come daily to work.”

“The Department is threatening to fire us but it’s fully aware that it is failing its workers and patients.”

When GroundUp visited Fort Beaufort Provincial Hospital on Tuesday, we found patients being transported in private vehicles.

Thando Ntsume from Hillside dropped a patient in casualty with his private vehicle. “I could see that she was in severe pain and battling to breathe. Her family had been calling for an ambulance since the morning but it never arrived.”

“I know from my own experience that there are no ambulances available in this hospital. Three months ago I was stabbed and admitted to this hospital. Doctors transferred me to Cecilia Makiwane Hospital but they told me I should find my own transport because ambulances are not available. My brother had to take me with his car to East London.”

Patients outside the Fort Beaufort Provincial Hospital casualty department complain about the lack of ambulances. Photo: Mkhuseli Sizani

Mihlali Matshoba says the ambulance crisis has been going on for a long time. “On 7 October I gave birth at home because ambulances are not available here in Fort Beaufort. Sometimes they are hours late or we are told there is only one ambulance operating.”

Nolly Oliphant had to borrow money to put fuel in her car to take her son to Cecilia Makiwane Hospital after he injured his hand.

“I drove with him to Fort Beaufort Provincial Hospital. The doctors treated him and told me that I should take him with my own transport to Cecilia Makiwane Hospital. “I had to borrow R1,200 for fuel because ambulances are not available.”

“The strike has been devastating,” said one of the Fort Beaufort doctors. “We had to ventilate a patient in Fort Beaufort for over 24 hours because of the strike. Eventually we managed to get a private ambulance to come. The hospitals have been using their bakkies to transport patients.”

Regional NEHAWU coordinator Mzamane Mgwantashe says the workers are not on strike. “Over 200 workers are coming everyday to work. But they cannot perform their duties because ambulances are faulty and not fully equipped. In February, ambulances were fully equipped by the Department in order to obtain service compliance certificates. The same day after the assessment was done the equipment was stripped by the Department. We don’t know why that was done and we don’t know where that equipment was taken.”

He said workers had been told cellphones had been bought for them, but they had never received them. “Instead the Department bought ‘push-to-talk’ devices without consulting the workers.”

Mkhululi Ndamase, spokesperson for Health MEC Nomakhosazana Meth, confirmed the notices to dismiss over 200 workers who had embarked on an unprotected strike. He said the department had addressed the issues raised by the union.

“All vehicles are licensed annually and a certificate of fitness is issued before a vehicle is put on the road. We are in agreement that if a vehicle does not carry the valid licence and/or the certificate of fitness displayed, it should not be used. There are more than enough vehicles in the pool even while vehicles may be grounded whilst being repaired. The rough terrain of our predominantly rural areas and high volume usage does make them vulnerable to breakdowns.”

He said the vehicles were replaced every 300,000 km.

On the issue of cellphones, he said the department had issued “push-to-talk devices” earlier this year and most paramedics had accepted them. Responding to the complaint about equipment being put in the ambulances just to get licence approval, Ndamase said this was being investigated.

“None of these issues are considered valid reasons to suspend services to the communities we serve.”

The department was using private ambulances to respond to emergency calls, which was costly. Two of these ambulances had been stoned, he said.

Ndamase said a rule of no work no pay would apply.

Written by Mkhuseli Sizani for GroundUp.

Source: GroundUp

This article is reproduced under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

US Stands Poised to Rescind Abortion Rights

Photo by Andy Feliciotti on Unsplash

The US Supreme Court has voted to strike down the landmark Roe v Wade decision which constitutionally protects abortion rights, according to an initial draft majority opinion leaked by news outlet POLITICO. This comes at a time when abortion rights are being challenged in a number of US states, and such a ruling would cause abortion to become immediately illegal in 22 US states.

In 2019, there were 630 000 reported abortions in the US in 2019, according to the US Centers for Disease Control, an 18% decrease compared with 2010. Women in their 20s accounted for 57% of abortions in 2019. Abortions are highest among black American women, with a rate of 27 per 1000 for ages 15–44.

The Roe v Wade decision in 1973 gave women in the US an absolute right to an abortion in the first three months of pregnancy, and limited rights in the second trimester.

In 1992, in Planned Parenthood v Casey, it was ruled that states could not place an “undue burden” on women seeking abortions before a foetus could survive outside the womb, at about 24 weeks.

The draft opinion written by Justice Samuel Alito completely refutes the 1973 decision which guaranteed constitutional protections of abortion rights in the US, and also a subsequent 1992 decision – Planned Parenthood v. Casey – that largely maintained the right. “Roe was egregiously wrong from the start,” Justice Alito wrote.

“We hold that Roe and Casey must be overruled,” he writes in the document, labelled as the “Opinion of the Court.” “It is time to heed the Constitution and return the issue of abortion to the people’s elected representatives.”

In the past, deliberations on controversial cases have been fluid, with justices occasionally changing their votes as draft opinions circulate. This represents a rare breach of Supreme Court secrecy and tradition around its deliberations. The final, binding decision, is expected to be published in two months. Currently, five Republican appointees including Justice Alito have voted in favour of repealing Roe and Casey, while the three Democrat appointees are dissenting. It is not known how the last member, Chief Justice John Roberts, will vote.

The ruling as it currently stands would end the 49 year old US constitutional protection of abortion rights, instead allowing each US state to restrict or ban abortions outright.

POLITICO notes that public disclosure of a draft decision is unprecedented in the court’s modern history. Some observers had predicted that the conservative majority would have chipped away at abortion rights without overturning it.

The draft shows that the court is seeking to reject Roe’s logic and legal protections. “The inescapable conclusion is that a right to abortion is not deeply rooted in the Nation’s history and traditions,” Justice Alito wrote, declaring that one Roe’s central tenets, the “viability” distinction between foetuses not capable of surviving outside the uterus and those which can, “makes no sense.”

Justice Alito also described doctors and nurses who terminate pregnancies as “abortionists”, instead of the more neutral term “abortion providers” used by Chief Justice Roberts.

Source: Politico

After More than Two Years, SA’s State of Disaster Finally Ends

Image by Quicknews

More than two years since the start of the COVID pandemic. President Cyril Ramaphosa on Monday evening (4 April) announced the repeal of South Africa’s national state of disaster. A transition to new regulations to manage the pandemic will take place in coming weeks.

However, the end of the state of emergency had already been extended, a decision met with much criticism. Its end had long been called for, including experts such as Professor Shabir Madhi of Wits University.

Speaking about the extension in January, Prof Madhi told the Daily Maverick that the state of disaster regulations “have done very little when it comes to protecting people from being infected, because, had it had any impact, we wouldn’t have had 70% of the population infected with the virus at least once since the start of the pandemic.”

In the announcement, President Ramaphosa said the state of disaster and associated lockdown restrictions had been needed to properly deal with the COVID pandemic.

The state of disaster also allowed the establishment of the COVID TERs scheme, the R350 social relief of distress grant, the extension of driving licences and other necessary changes.

President Ramaphosa stated that the state of disaster and its powers were always ‘temporary and limited’, with the country now entering a new phase in the pandemic. While SARS-CoV-2 continues to circulate in the country, experience had already shown early in the fourth wave that the Omicron variant has decoupled COVID infection from rates of hospitalisation or deaths.

“Going forward, the pandemic will be managed in terms of the National Health Act. The draft Health Regulations have been published for public comment. Once the period for public comment closes on the 16th of April 2022 and the comments have been considered, the new regulations will be finalised and promulgated.

“Since the requirements for the National State of Disaster to be declared in terms of the Disaster Management Act are no longer met, Cabinet has decided to terminate the National State of Disaster with effect from midnight tonight.”

President Ramaphosa said certain provisional regulations will remain in place for a further 30 days to ensure a smooth handover to the new regulations under the National Health Act.

The transitional measure which will automatically lapse after 30 days include:

  • Wearing face masks must continue to be worn in an indoor public space.
  • Gatherings will continue to be restricted in size. Indoor and outdoor venues can accept 50% of capacity subject to vaccination or a COVID test. Gatherings of 1000 people indoors and 2000 people outdoors are permitted for the unvaccinated.
  • Travellers entering South Africa will need to show proof of vaccination or proof of a negative test.
  • The R350 SRD grant will remain in place, with the Department of Social Development finalising separate regulations allowing it to continue.
  • The grace period for driving licence extensions remain in place.

All other regulations fall away from midnight and the COVID alert levels will no longer apply, President Ramaphosa said. The no-fault vaccination compensation scheme will also continue operating.

Source: BusinessTech

Exodus of Healthcare Professionals as NHI Introduction Nears

Stethoscope
Photo by Hush Naidoo on Unsplash

The prospect of an exodus of doctors and other key healthcare personnel from South Africa ahead of the planned introduction of the National Health Insurance (NHI) scheme has prompted concern among healthcare stakeholders.

In addition to the loss of skilled healthcare professionals, there is also a growing concern that the country could lose valuable training skills as professionals look to leave.

Thirteen years on from its inception, the NHI continues to suffer from the same criticisms. A May 2021 research paper [PDF} found that South Africa’s per capita spending on public healthcare was higher than even wealthier developing countries, yet it ranked near the bottom for measures of healthcare outcomes.

An informal poll on the QuickNews website in March showed that 81% of respondents had at least considered emigrating due to the planned introduction of NHI.

Professional associations are also warning of an exodus with the start of NHI. The South African Medical Association (SAMA) has said that its members cannot support the NHI in its current form.

This stems from a deep-rooted lack of confidence in the capacity of government and its financial ability to ensure the service is successful, the association said. Other concerns that members have raised include only providing emergency treatment to refugees and illegal immigrants, as well as their children.

SAMA conducted a survey which showed that up to 38% of its members plan to emigrate from South Africa due to the planned introduction of the NHI.

6% of members said that they plan to emigrate for other reasons, while 17% of doctors said that they were unsure about leaving the country. Many doctors have said that the aim should rather be to get the public sector to a state where it can appeal to private sector patients.

They added that there should be engagement with private doctors to provide additional services funded by the state. The group also called for a proper pilot of the proposed systems and payment mechanisms.

The Department of Health noted these concerns in a parliamentary briefing this week, noting that skilled personnel will be needed for the NHI to work. It added that this was not limited to healthcare professionals, but that general skilled human resources will be central to the health system going forward.

It added that the complex interactions between training, registration compliance and employment can all be greatly improved.

“This is a big ship that will need to be turned, but the framework is in place,” said acting director-general of health Dr Nicholas Crisp. “We have heard the threats that there will be an exodus of personnel if the NHI is implemented and a brain drain.”

The department is actively responding to this, he said, with a framework in place to ensure the country retains the necessary skills. A ‘Human Resources for Health strategy’ before was already under development before the start of the COVID pandemic, he added.

This framework sets out a multi-work implementation plan, but it requires money and investment in the health workforce to ensure the country is ready for universal health coverage, Dr Crisp said.

“Every health professional has a place in the National Health Insurance – whether you choose to work in the public portion of the delivery system or the private portion of that delivery system.

“We do not think there needs to be a threat on anybody, or their viability, or their role to be played.”

Source: BusinessTech

WHO Condemns Attacks on Hospitals in Ukraine

Source: Pixabay CC0

On Sunday 13 March, the World Health Organization released a statement condemning recent attacks on hospitals and other healthcare facilities in Ukraine, which it called “horrific”. It also called for an immediate end of all such attacks, which are killing and injuring both patients and health care workers, as well as threatening vital health services.

“To attack the most vulnerable – babies, children, pregnant women, and those already suffering from illness and disease, and health workers risking their own lives to save lives – is an act of unconscionable cruelty,” the organisation said.

WHO’s Surveillance System for Attacks on Health Care (SSA) has documented 31 attacks on health care since the outset of the war that started with the Russian invasion on 24 February, now in its third week. These include 24 incidents of damage to or destruction of health care facilities, and five cases of ambulances.

In one incident, a maternity hospital was hit by a Russian air strike, causing three deaths including a child.

There have been 12 deaths and 34 injuries as a result of these attacks, and impaired access to and availability of essential health services, the WHO stated. Since attacks are ongoing, this is expected to continue.

The organisation also stresses that such attacks also directly impact the needs of vulnerable groups, and the health care needs of pregnant women, new mothers, younger children and older people inside Ukraine are rising even as violence curtails health care access.

“For example, more than 4,300 births have occurred in Ukraine since the start of war and 80 000 Ukrainian women are expected to give birth in next three months. Oxygen and medical supplies, including for the management of pregnancy complications, are running dangerously low,” the WHO statement read. WHO warned that Ukraine’s health care system is “clearly under significant strain” and a collapse would be a “catastrophe”. It stresses that “every effort must be made” to prevent this.

“International humanitarian and human rights law must be upheld, and the protection of civilians must be our top priority.

They call for international humanitarian and human rights laws to be upheld, with the protection of civilians as a top priority. Aid and health care workers must be able to continue and strengthen service delivery, and health services should be provided at border crossing, to provide prompt care and referral for children and pregnant people. Care should be unimpeded, with access to civilians in all areas of the conflict, and health care and services should be protected from attacks.

WHO stated that, in the wake of COVID’s huge strain, “such attacks have the potential to be even more devastating for the civilian population.” As such, it called for an urgent ceasefire.

“Finally, we call for an immediate ceasefire, which includes unhindered access so that people in need can access humanitarian assistance. A peaceful resolution to end the war in Ukraine is possible.”

Source: World Health Organization

Political Factors Drove Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin COVID Prescriptions

Photo by Andy Feliciotti on Unsplash

Hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, two COVID treatments that have been shown to be ineffective for those purposes, were more heavily prescribed in the second half of 2020 in parts of the US that voted for the Republican party, according to a new research letter published in JAMA Internal Medicine.

“We’d all like to think of the health care system as basically non-partisan, but the COVID pandemic may have started to chip away at this assumption,” said lead author Michael Barnett, assistant professor of health policy and management.

The study compared prescription rates for hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin with rates for two control medications, methotrexate sodium and albendazole, which are similar drugs but have not been proposed as COVID treatments. Comparing different US counties, researchers looked at deidentified medical claims data from January 2019 through December 2020 from roughly 18.5 million adults as well as census and voting data.

Overall, hydroxychloroquine prescribing volume from June through December 2020 was roughly double what it had been in the previous year, while the volume of ivermectin prescriptions was seven-fold higher in December 2020 than the previous year. In 2019, prescribing of hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin did not differ according to county Republican vote share. However, that changed in 2020.

After June 2020 – coinciding with when the US Food and Drug Administration revoked emergency use authorisation for hydroxychloroquine – prescribing volume for the drug was significantly higher in counties with the highest Republican vote share as compared to counties with the lowest vote share.

As for ivermectin, prescribing volume was significantly higher in the highest versus lowest Republican vote share counties in December 2020 a 964% increase on the overall prescribing volume in 2019. The spike lined up with with a number of key events, such as the mid-November 2020 release of a now-retracted manuscript claiming that the drug was highly effective against COVID, and a widely publicised US Senate hearing in early December that included testimony from a doctor promoting ivermectin as a COVID treatment.

Neither of the control drugs had differences in overall prescribing volume or in prescribing by county Republican vote share.

The authors concluded that the prescribing of hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin may have been influenced by physician or patient political affiliation. “This is the first evidence, to our knowledge, of such a political divide for a basic clinical decision like infection treatment or prevention,” said Barnett.

Source: Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health

NHI Faces Healthcare Human Resource Emigration Challenges

Photo by Daniel Eledut on Unsplash

While the proposed National Health Insurance (NHI) could make use of existing private healthcare human resources, the necessary tax increases to fund it could drive more healthcare professionals from the country, the Professional Provident Society (PPS) has said.  Economic and other factors, such as the Durban unrest, have already caused a surge of emigrations of professionals since July last year. In addition, foreign students graduates who study critical skills in South Africa (such as nurses and GPs) will no longer have an easy route to permanent residency. 

The PPS, which counts about 30 000 healthcare professionals among its membership, pointed out the vulnerability of South Africa’s tax base – which has shrunk to only 6.9 million taxpayers, down from 7.6 million the year from the year before.

While it raised a number of concerns about the NHI, the group stated that it was broadly supportive of establishing universal healthcare in the country, and this goal could still be accomplished by using a dual public-private system. The PPS further noted that the government could benefit from the exceptional administrative capabilities and existing patient management systems.

However, NHI is dependent on strong, competitively remunerated human resources, with PPS pointing out that “South Africa has experienced a mass exodus of nurses in the 90s; we cannot risk that again. Both the government and private sector need to find a solution for South Africa and it cannot ‘import solutions’.”

“Professionals are a big proportion of healthcare delivery and the tax base. Their voices need to be considered.

“We urgently need to see the funding model, the implementation of the Health Market Inquiry (HMI) and details of how the system will work.”

The PPS said in a 2019 report that the highest risk to effective universal health cover in South Africa is losing highly skilled professionals to emigration. Healthcare professionals have a great deal of geographic freedom, and it is becoming easier to work in their trades the world over. COVID with its restrictions may have slowed emigrations by skilled professionals, but since July 2021, experts have seen a surge backed up by 18 months of pent-up demand. 

The PPS noted that research has shown “that the decision to emigrate is a complex one that is driven by various personal and societal pull and push factors.”  The NHI could be yet another push factor adding to the list of healthcare professionals’ sore points. “Healthcare worker migration from South Africa in the past has been driven by policy decisions and socio-economic and political considerations.

“In 2001, the number of nurse emigrants was roughly 20% of the total number working within the public sector in South Africa. That, together with being ranked as having the eighth-highest global number of emigrating physicians in the year 2000, created a dire situation for the sustainability of healthcare in South Africa at the time.”

Among general professionals, PPS’s research has indicated that many are considering emigration. A majority of respondents surveyed (73%) cited NHI as a potential reason for emigration, with 15% unsure and only 12% not considering leaving at all.

In addition to losses from emigration, the Department of Home Affairs has ended a 2014 waiver which allowed a quicker path to a residency permit for foreign students who acquire critical skills in South African higher learning institutions. Going forward, foreign students will no longer be able to apply for permanent residency visas without complying with the usual requirements such as providing proof of five years’ work experience. This is seen as detrimental to South Africa’s ability to attract and retain skilled professionals. This may further impact NHI implementation as the necessary skilled human resources are squeezed further as fewer foreign students may choose to study and then work in South Africa.

Source: BusinessTech

National Treasury Proposes e-Cigarette Tax

Photo by Toan Nguyen on Unsplash

The National Treasury is proposing to impose a tax on both the non-nicotine and nicotine solutions in e-cigarettes (EC), and is asking for public comment by 7 February 2022.

The National Treasury published a draft discussion paper in December 2021 on the proposed taxation of e-cigarettes (ECs). The National Treasury defines e-cigarettes as battery powered devices that do not burn or use tobacco leaves but vaporise e-liquid solutions for inhalation.

In its discussion paper, the Treasury notes the uncertainty of e-cigarettes’ health risks, so it seeks stakeholder engagement on its proposal for the taxation of ECs.

The National Treasury proposes to introduce a specific excise tax on both the non-nicotine and nicotine solutions used in ECs and intends to use its existing policy guidelines applicable to other excisable products to do so. For example, traditional tobacco products are subject to excise duties at a rate of 40% of the price of the most popular brand in each tobacco category. 

For EC users, that would mean paying R2.03 per mL of EC solution nicotine-containing nicotine and R0.87 per mL of nicotine-free EC solution, if the draft proposals are accepted and become legislation. It is also proposed that EC products with a higher nicotine content will attract a higher duty rate.
Certain stakeholders may question that the Treasury’s proposed EC tax extends to nicotine-free liquids, as it does not necessarily support the government’s stated policy intention of reducing the consumption of tobacco products. The use of ECs as a means of quitting tobacco products is well established, with a Cochrane review showing that nicotine-containing ECs resulted in increased odds of quitting than nicotine-free ECs. 
It could also generate a knock-on illicit trade in e-cigarettes, as has  already happened in the tobacco sector.

Manufacturers and importers who would be taxed on ECs will need stringent certifications by accredited laboratories, which use either South African National Accreditation or International Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation (ILAC) approved methodologies.  Where such certifications are not available, a penalty rate of duty is being proposed.

Comments on the draft discussion document are due by 7 February 2022.

Source: Webber Wentzel

Mediclinic and Discovery Sound Warnings over NHI Bill

Photo by Markus Winkler on Unsplash

Private hospital group Mediclinic has warned that the government’s proposed National Health Insurance (NHI) system will threaten public health in South Africa, and bring about the destruction of private healthcare and medical aid cover.

The NHI Bill is currently undergoing a public consultation process, with a number of healthcare, civil society and political groups presenting on why the new system should or should not be introduced.

The Bill as it stands will have a direct impact on access to healthcare services in South Africa. Mediclinic notes that there are insufficient resources to implement it; private-sector hospitals will be curtailed; and medical aids will be eroded.

The financial and human resources necessary to effectively implement the NHI scheme is a legitimate concern, Mediclinic said. It pointed out South Africa’s low doctor- and nurse-to-population ratios are low compared to peer countries.

“Everyone’s right of access to health care services would be threatened if the existing health care delivery system is uprooted and the NHI scheme envisaged in the Bill cannot be effectively implemented,” it said.

Private healthcare is an integral part of the healthcare system with everything from hospital beds to staff at risk if replaced by the NHI.

The Bill’s key components threaten the private hospital sector, with the contracting and reimbursement frameworks proposed in it unable to accommodate private hospital participation.

Additionally, the NHI Fund will create a monopoly by acting as the single purchaser of health care services in South Africa, capable of harming the competition and eroding private sector resources.

Medical scheme provider Discovery said that current private health care funding amounts to R212 billion, some 44% of the total healthcare spend. If the government were to finance this through direct taxation, this would equate to 4.1% of GDP, an unfeasible amount.

Mediclinic also warned that medical aid in South Africa would be significantly eroded under the NHI, meaning only the bare basics for South Africans needing medical care, and expensive treatments being unavailable. It gave the example of a patient with chronic renal failure receiving haemodialysis treatment currently covered by a medical scheme, and showed that the patient would be placed on a long waiting list for this life-saving treatment since it was covered (but not properly funded) by the NHI.

Source: BusinessTech

SA’s Top 10 Health Topics to Watch in 2022

Photo by Towfiqu barbhuiya from Pexels

Spotlight highlights the country’s top 10 health topics to keep an eye on in 2022.

1. COVID prosecutions
Former health minister Dr Zweli Mkhize resigned amid allegations of wrongdoing in the Digital Vibes scandal, and hit back at the findings of the Special Investigations Unit, which had also implicated a number of top health department officials. Whether Health Minister Dr Joe Phaahla  will take decisive action against those found guilty will be an important litmus test. Last year, Dr Phaahla assured the public that the department “is going to thoroughly and decisively act to ensure nothing is swept under the carpet”.

2. The NHI Bill
Public hearings on the National Health Insurance Bill will be done by the end of January, with feedback in February and final report by April 1. It then goes to the National Council of Provinces for a similar stakeholder process, and before the end of 2022 it could be signed into law.
To date, public inputs on the Bill were mostly on governance issues. A critical point this year is whether MPs will take these inputs on board and make significant changes to the bill, or whether they will simply force through the bill largely unchanged.

3. Medico-legal claims
With R74 billion in medico-legal claims against the state, the State Liability Bill is back on Parliament’s agenda. Instead of government departments paying a lump sum for successful medical negligence claims, the Bill proposes a new settlement structure of separate payments to relieve budgetary pressure on hospitals. Since the necessary final report from the South African Law Reform Commission is months away, Spotlight does not think the Bill will be passed this year – and first prize would be to prevent medico-legal claims from happening.

4. Healthcare budget cuts
Unfortunately, there is still no end in sight to continued budget cuts to healthcare. Employing more nurses could reduce medico-legal claims, but in fact there is a growing shortage of nurses. Even th Office of Health Standards Compliance is also hamstrung by inadequate funding, with only 61 inspectors to cover more than 5000 public healthcare facilities, putting off private sector inspections until next year.

5. HIV prophylaxis
With the extremely promising results of injectable pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV, there is still a process to go through before it will be made available in South Africa this year. COVID has shown that processes can be sped up if there is the will, but whether there is the same drive to treat HIV remains to be seen. As such, PrEP will most likely only be available in public healthcare facilities by the end of 2023.

6. An end to the COVID pandemic
While South Africa is heading towards living with COVID as an endemic disease, it is impossible to predict what surprises the coronavirus will have in store for the world this year in the form of new variants. However, according to Director of the Medical Research Council, Professor Glenda Gray, the winter months will give us an idea of the direction the pandemic will take with a fifth wave. Vaccination will remain key to reducing its severity.

7. SA’s TB programme
COVID severely set back SA’s TB programme, but 2022 should see the arrival of a number of delayed initiatives. These include rollout of the relatively new 3HP prevention pills, the results of new X-ray detection technology and  consequent possible changes to screening and testing, and an update to the Thembisa HIV model which will now include TB.

8. The National Mental Health Policy Framework
The new National Mental Health Policy Framework and Strategic Plan are expected to be finalised this year. However, as with the NHI, funding remains a problem. Only 5% of the current health budget goes to mental health services, and it only provides for one in 10 of those in need.

9. Improved procurement legislation
As illustrated by the government’s COVID procurement debacle, an overhaul is needed. Draft Public Procurement Bill proposes a single regulatory framework for all goods and services procured by government departments and has the potential to strengthen and streamline procurement processes. However, Spotlight notes that critically important pieces of legislation can simply vanish, as did the Medical Schemes Amendment Bill of 2018.

10. No-fault compensation fund
The COVID vaccine injury no-fault compensation fund has quietly fallen off the radar, with no payouts made to date. However, the NICD again urged people to report adverse events with the vaccine.

Source: Spotlight