Month: June 2023

Long COVID’s Fatigue Impacts can be Worse than Some Cancers

Photo by Karolina Grabowska on Pexels

A new UK study has found that fatigue is the most significant symptom for long COVID patients, and can affect quality of life more than some cancers. The research, published in BMJ Open, examines the impact of long COVID on the lives of over 3750 patients who were referred to a long COVID clinic and used a digital app as part of their NHS treatment for the condition.

Patients were asked to complete questionnaires on the app about how long COVID was affecting them – considering the impact of long COVID on their day-to-day activities, levels of fatigue, depression, anxiety, breathlessness, brain fog, and their quality of life.

The researchers, from UCL and the University of Exeter, found that many long COVID patients were seriously ill and on average had fatigue scores worse or similar to people with cancer-related anaemia or severe kidney disease. Their health-related quality of life scores were also lower than those of people with advanced metastatic cancers, like stage IV lung cancer.

Overall, the team found that the impact of long COVID on the daily activities of patients was worse than that of stroke patients and was comparable to that of patients with Parkinson’s disease.

Dr Henry Goodfellow, who co-led the study alongside the late Professor Elizabeth Murray (both UCL Institute of Epidemiology & Health), said: “Up to around 17% of people who get COVID go on to develop long COVID *. However, the impact of the condition on patients’ day-to-day lives isn’t fully understood.

“Our results have found that long COVID can have a devastating effect on the lives of patients – with fatigue having the biggest impact on everything from social activities to work, chores and maintaining close relationships.”

Not only does long COVID negatively impact the lives of patients on an individual level, the researchers also believe that it could have a significant economic and social impact on the country.

In order to be referred to a long COVID clinic, a patient must have had symptoms in keeping with long COVID for at least 12 weeks after an acute infection.

Over 90% of long COVID patients using the app were of working age (18-65) and 51% said they had been unable to work for at least one day in the previous month, with 20% unable to work at all.

Meanwhile, 71% of patients were female. As working-age women make up a majority of the health and social care workforce, the impact of long COVID on their ability to function may add additional pressures to already stretched services.

Dr Goodfellow said: “We hope that a greater understanding of the symptoms and impact of long COVID in these patients will help the NHS and policymakers to target limited resources by adapting existing services and designing new ones to better meet the needs of patients with long COVID .”

Alongside fatigue, long COVID patients typically experience breathlessness, anxiety, depression and brain fog. This is the first study to report on the impact of the condition on day-to-day functioning and health-related quality of life in patients who have been referred for specialist rehabilitation in long COVID clinics across England.

Dr Goodfellow said: “Our findings show that fatigue should be an important focus for clinical care and the design of rehabilitation services.

“Post-COVID assessment services should consider focusing on assessing and treating fatigue to maximise the recovery and return to work for sufferers of long COVID .”

Source: University College London

Muscle Adiposity may Indicate Cognitive Decline in Aging

Photo by Kindel Media on Pexels

New research reveals that the level of muscle adiposity (fat content) may indicate a person’s likelihood of experiencing cognitive decline as they age. In the study published in the Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, a five-year increase in fat stored in the thigh muscle was a risk factor for cognitive decline.

This risk was independent of total weight, other fat deposits, and muscle characteristics (such as muscle strength or mass) and also independent of traditional dementia risk factors.

Investigators assessed muscle fat in 1634 adults 69–79 years of age at years 1 and 6 and evaluated their cognitive function at years 1, 3, 5, 8, and 10. Increases in muscle adiposity from year 1 to year 6 were associated with faster and more cognitive decline over time. The findings were similar for Black and White men and women.

“Our data suggest that muscle adiposity plays a unique role in cognitive decline, distinct from that of other types of fat or other muscle characteristics,” said corresponding author Caterina Rosano, MD, MPH, of the University of Pittsburgh’s School of Public Health. “If that is the case, then the next step is to understand how muscle fat and the brain ‘talk’ to each other, and whether reducing muscle adiposity can also reduce dementia risk.”

Source: Wiley

Immunomodulator Keeps Subclinical Arthritis from Developing into Full-blown Form

Photo by Towfiqu barbhuiya: https://www.pexels.com/photo/person-feeling-pain-in-the-knee-11349880/

In a 12-month trial involving patients with “preclinical” rheumatoid arthritis, treatment with the immunomodulator abatacept (Orencia) kept the condition from becoming clinical, according to findings presented at the European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) annual meeting.

Rheumatologists have long sought to nip rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in the bud, with many studies supporting early aggressive treatment on RA diagnosis. This has never been recommended for biologic therapies however.

Nevertheless, some patients show up at arthritis clinics with a few painful joints and other features such as RA-related serum biomarkers that suggest progression to full-blown RA is likely. Would aggressive treatment help slow their decline into RA?

In a phase IIb randomised trial involving patients in the UK and Netherlands who were at high risk for developing RA, only seven of the 110 assigned to abatacept had gone on to develop clinical arthritis after 1 year, compared with 30 of 103 in a placebo group.

The effect waned after abatacept was stopped at the one-year mark, and in the following year, 20 more patients in the abatacept group developed clinical arthritis, as did another eight in the placebo group.

Though the abatacept regimen held the edge for a full two years, projections showed that it was likely that the abatacept group would catch up with additional follow-up. At the same time, abatacept had no particular safety issues and thus could likely be continued.

A decade ago, Andrew Cope, MD, MBBS, of King’s College London colleagues thought about aggressive prevention, registering the current trial, Arthritis Prevention in the Pre-clinical Phase of RA with Abatacept (APIPPRA), in 2014. In a 2019 description of the protocol, they explained the selection of abatacept because “it targets immune reactions early in the chain of events leading to inflammation in RA. It functions by interrupting the interaction between T cells and antigen-presenting cells, attenuating the co-stimulatory signals required for T-cell activation, differentiation and effector responses,” thereby resulting “in downstream immunomodulatory effects on other inflammatory cells of the immune system.”

Participants had to show joint pain but no synovitis, plus either test positive for anti-citrullinated protein antigen (ACPA) antibodies and for rheumatoid factor (RF), or show high levels of ACPA antibodies without RF. The primary endpoint was development of clinically apparent arthritis in at least three joints or diagnosis of RA according to standard criteria.

While the preventive effect seen in the primary analysis did not hold up across the whole sample, Cope noted that it appeared more so in one very-high-risk subgroup: 49 patients who had some level of IgG ACPA antibodies and who were also positive for a series of other biomarkers, including RF, IgA ACPA antibodies, anti-carbamylated protein antibodies, and anti-acetylated peptide antibodies. For this subgroup, only about 10% of those who had taken abatacept progressed to clinical arthritis after two years, versus 50% of those assigned to placebo.

Source: MedPage Today

Oestrogen Pills may Increase Hypertension Risk

Photo by cottonbro studio

Women ages 45 years and older taking oral oestrogen pills were more likely to develop hypertension than those using transdermal or vaginal formulations, according to new research published in Hypertension.

Less oestrogen and progesterone is produced in a woman’s body after menopause, which may increase the risk for cardiovascular diseases including heart failure, according to the American Heart Association.

Hormone therapy may be prescribed to relieve symptoms of menopause, in gender-affirming care and in contraception. Previous studies have found that some hormone therapies may reduce cardiovascular disease risk in menopausal women under 60 years of age or for whom it has been fewer than 10 years since menopause. The authors of this study noted that while hypertension is a modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular disease, the potential effects of different types of hormone therapy on blood pressure in menopausal women remain uncertain. 

“We know oestrogens ingested orally are metabolised through the liver, and this is associated with an increase in factors that can lead to higher blood pressure,” said lead study author Cindy Kalenga, an MD/PhD-candidate at the University of Calgary. 

“We know that post-menopausal women have increased risk of high blood pressure when compared to pre-menopausal women, furthermore, previous studies have shown that specific types of hormone therapy have been associated with higher rates of heart disease,” Kalenga said. “We chose to dive deeper into factors associated with hormone therapy, such as the route of administration (oral vs non-oral) and type of oestrogen, and how they may affect blood pressure.”

This study involved a large group of over 112 000 women, ages 45 years and older, who filled at least two consecutive prescriptions (a six-month cycle) for oestrogen-only hormone therapy, as identified from health administrative data in Alberta, Canada between 2008 and 2019. The main outcome of high blood pressure (hypertension) was identified via health records.

First, researchers investigated the relationship between route of oestrogen-only hormone therapy administration and risk of developing high blood pressure at least one year after starting the treatment. The 3 different routes of hormone therapy administration were oral (by mouth), transdermal and vaginal application. Additionally, researchers evaluated the formulation of oestrogen used and the risk of developing high blood pressure. For this study, the researchers reviewed medical records of individuals taking oestrogen-only hormone therapy. The two most common forms of oestrogen used by study participants were oestradiol – a synthetic form of oestrogen closest to the naturally produced form – and conjugated equine oestrogen, an animal-derived form of oestrogen and the oldest type of oestrogen therapy.

The analysis found:

  • Women taking oral oestrogen therapy had a 14% higher risk of developing high blood pressure compared to those using transdermal oestrogen and a 19% higher risk of developing high blood pressure compared to those using vaginal oestrogen creams or suppositories. After accounting for age, a stronger association was seen among women younger than 70 years of age compared to women older than 70.
  • Compared to estradiol, conjugated equine estrogen was associated with an 8% increased risk of developing high blood pressure.

Taking oestrogen for a longer period of time or taking a higher dose was associated with greater risk of high blood pressure, the authors noted. According to Kalenga, the study’s findings suggest that if menopausal woman take hormone therapy, there are different types of oestrogen that may have lower cardiovascular risks.

“These may include low-dose, non-oral oestrogen – like oestradiol, in transdermal or vaginal forms – for the shortest possible time period, based on individual symptoms and the risk–benefit ratio, Kalenga said. “These may also be associated with the lowest risk of hypertension. Of course, this must be balanced with the important benefits of hormone therapy, which include treatment of common menopausal symptoms.”

The average age of natural menopause among women worldwide is about 50 years of age. Current evidence supports that initiating menopausal hormone therapy in the early stages may have cardiovascular benefits, though not in the late stages of menopause, according to the American Heart Association’s 2020 Statement on Menopause Transition and Cardiovascular Disease Risk: Implications for Timing of Early Prevention. Previous studies have found that menopausal hormone therapy may help relieve symptoms of menopause, including hot flashes, night sweats, mood changes or sleep disturbances.

Limitations included being based only on medical records, not including women younger than the age of 45 and not collecting data about hysterectomies or menopausal status (which was inferred by taking oestrogen after 45).

The authors will be conducting more research investigating combined oestrogen and progestin, as well as progestin-only formulations of hormone therapy and their impact on heart and kidney diseases.

Source: American Heart Association

Atropine Eyedrops Shown to Slow Progression of Myopia in Children

Photo by Anna Shvets on Pexels

The first drug therapy to slow the progression of nearsightedness in children is a step closer after the results of a successful clinical trial.

The results of the CHAMP (Childhood Atropine for Myopia Progression) trial were published in JAMA Ophthalmology. The three-year study found that a daily drop in each eye of a low dose of atropine, a drug used to dilate pupils, was better than a placebo at limiting eyeglass prescription changes and inhibiting elongation of the eye in nearsighted children aged six to 10.

About one in three adults worldwide is nearsighted, and the global prevalence of myopia is predicted to increase to 50% by 2050. Though one federally approved contact lens can slow progression of nearsightedness, no pharmaceutical products are approved in the US or Europe to treat myopia.

That elongation of the eyeball leads to myopia which starts in young children and progresses into the teen years before levelling off in most people. In addition to requiring life-long vision correction, nearsightedness increases the risk for retinal detachment, macular degeneration, cataracts and glaucoma later in life – and most corrective lenses don’t do anything to stop myopia progression.

“The idea of keeping eyeballs smaller isn’t just so people’s glasses are thinner – it would also be so that in their 70s they don’t suffer visual impairment,” said lead study author Karla Zadnik, professor and dean of the College of Optometry at The Ohio State University.

“This is exciting work for the myopia research community, which I’ve been part of for 35 years. We’ve talked about treatment and control for decades,” she said. “And it’s exciting to think that there could be options in the future for millions of children we know are going to be myopic.”

Animal studies years ago hinted at atropine’s ability to slow the growth of the eye, but the full-strength drug’s interference with near vision and concerns about pupil dilation hindered early considerations of its potential as a human therapy for myopia. More recent research has suggested a low dose of atropine might be the ticket.

This new double-masked, randomised phase 3 trial assessed the safety and effectiveness of two low-dose solutions, with atropine concentrations of either .01% or .02%, versus placebo. Treatment for each of the 489 children ages six to 10 assessed for the drug’s effectiveness consisted of one daily drop per eye at bedtime, which minimised the disruption of any blurring effects atropine might have on vision.

Researchers were a bit surprised to find that the most significant improvements at all time points compared to placebo resulted from the solution containing .01% of atropine. Though the .02% atropine formulation was also better at slowing progression of myopia than placebo, the results were less consistent.

“The .01% story is clearer and more obvious in terms of significantly slowing both the growth of the eye as well as then resulting in a lower glasses prescription,” Zadnik said.

Including a measure of the eye’s growth was a key component of the study because “the field is actually moving toward axial elongation being as important as, or more important than, the glasses prescription in terms of the most meaningful outcome,” she said. “If we’re trying to slow eye growth to prevent bad outcomes for people in their 80s, measuring the eye growth directly is really important.”

The drugs’ safety was assessed in a larger sample of 573 participants that also included children as young as 3 and up to age 16. Both low-dose formulations were safe and well tolerated. The most common side effects were sensitivity to light, allergic conjunctivitis, eye irritation, dilated pupils and blurred vision, although reports of these side effects were few.

The CHAMP trial was the first study of low-dose atropine to include placebo controls for three years and to involve a large, diverse population recruited from 26 clinical sites in North America and five countries in Europe. In a second section of the trial, researchers are evaluating how the eyes respond when the treatment is over.

Source: Ohio State University

Safety and Efficacy of Oral Semaglutide Shown in Clinical Trial Success

Photo by Andres Ayrton on Pexels

Participants taking a daily 50mg dose of oral semaglutide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist, lost more weight than those taking placebo, according to results announced by the manufacturer, Norvo Nordisk.

Novo Nordisk announced headline results from phase 3a trial in a statement. The OASIS 1 trial is a 68-week, efficacy and safety trial comparing once-daily oral semaglutide 50mg for weight management to placebo in 667 adults with obesity or overweight with one or more comorbidities. Participants also undertook lifestyle interventions.

When evaluating the effects of treatment if all people adhered to treatment from a mean baseline body weight of 105.4 kg, people treated with oral semaglutide 50mg achieved a statistically significant weight loss of 17.4% after 68 weeks compared to a 1.8% reduction with placebo. In addition, 89.2% of those who received oral semaglutide 50mg, reached a weight loss of 5% or more after 68 weeks, compared to 24.5% with placebo.

When applying the treatment policy estimand, people treated with oral semaglutide 50 mg achieved a superior weight loss of 15.1% compared to a reduction of 2.4% with placebo and 84.9% achieved a weight loss of 5% or more, compared to 25.8% with placebo.

“We are very pleased with the weight loss demonstrated by the once-daily oral formulation of semaglutide in obesity. The results show comparable weight loss as in the STEP 1 trial with injectable semaglutide 2.4mg in obesity branded as Wegovy®”, said Martin Holst Lange, executive vice president for Development at Novo Nordisk. ”The choice between a daily tablet or weekly injection for obesity has the potential to offer patients and healthcare providers the opportunity to choose what best suits individual treatment preferences”.

Oral semaglutide 50 mg also appeared be safe and was well tolerated, with the most common adverse events being mostly mild to moderate gastrointestinal ones consistent with the GLP-1 receptor agonist class. Gastrointestinal adverse events were most prominent during dose escalation.

Novo Nordisk expects to file for regulatory approval in the US and the EU in 2023. The global launch of oral semaglutide 50mg is contingent on portfolio prioritisations and manufacturing capacity.

Source: Novo Nordisk

Scientists Use Modified Peptides to Create New Class of Antibiotics

Photo by CDC on Unsplash

New antibiotics are urgently needed to tackle resistant bacteria. Researchers at the University of Zurich and the company Spexis have now modified the chemical structure of naturally occurring peptides to develop antimicrobial molecules that bind to novel targets in the bacteria’s metabolism.

In a study recently published in Science Advances, chemist Oliver Zerbe, head of the NMR facilities at the University of Zurich now discusses the development of a highly effective class of antibiotics that fight Gram-negative bacteria in a novel way.

The WHO classifies this group of bacteria as extremely dangerous. The group, whose resistance is particularly high due to their double cell membrane, includes carbapenem-resistant enterobacteria, for example.

Natural peptide chemically optimised

The starting point for the researchers’ study was a naturally occurring peptide called thanatin, which insects use to fend off infections. Thanatin disrupts an important lipopolysaccharide transport bridge between the outer and inner membrane of Gram-negative bacteria, as revealed a few years ago in a study by now retired UZH professor John Robinson. As a result, these metabolites build up inside the cells, and the bacteria perish. However, thanatin isn’t suitable for use as an antibiotic drug, among other things due to its low effectiveness and because bacteria quickly become resistant to it.

The researchers therefore modified the chemical structure of thanatin to enhance the peptide’s characteristics. “To do this, structural analyses were essential,” says Zerbe. His team synthetically assembled the various components of the bacterial transport bridge and then used nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) to visualize where and how thanatin binds to and disrupts the transport bridge. Using this information, researchers from Spexis AG planned the chemical modifications that were necessary to boost the peptide’s antibacterial effects. Further mutations were made to increase the molecule’s stability, among other things.

Effective, safe and immune to resistance

The synthetic peptides were then tested in mice with bacterial infections – and yielded outstanding results. “The novel antibiotics proved very effective, especially for treating lung infections,” says Zerbe. “They are also highly effective against carbapenem-resistant enterobacteria, where most other antibiotics fail.” In addition, the newly developed peptides aren’t toxic or harmful to the kidneys, and they also proved stable in the blood over a longer period – all of which are properties that are required for gaining approval as a drug. However, further preclinical studies are needed before the first tests in humans can begin.

When choosing the most promising peptides for their study, the researchers made sure that they would also be effective against bacteria that have already developed resistance to thanatin. “We’re confident this will significantly slow down the development of antibacterial resistance,” says Zerbe. “We now have the prospect of a new class of antibiotics becoming available that is also effective against resistant bacteria.”

Source: University of Zurich

Portable Ultrasound Works Just as Well in Diagnosing Forearm Fractures in Kids

Photo by cottonbro studio

Portable ultrasound devices could provide an alternative to x-ray machines for diagnosing forearm fractures in children, which could alleviate waiting times for families in hospital emergency departments (ED).

Griffith University researchers Professor Robert Ware and Senior Lecturer Peter Snelling compared functional outcomes in children given an ultrasound and those who received an x-ray on a suspected distal forearm fracture. Dr Snelling said the ultrasounds were performed by nurses, physiotherapists and emergency physicians at four south-east Queensland hospitals.

“They treated 270 children, aged between five and 15 years, during the randomised trial, which included a check-up 28 days later and another check-in at eight weeks,” Dr Snelling said. “The findings show the majority of children had similar recoveries and returned to full physical function.”

Less than one-third of children who were given an ultrasound needed a follow-up x-ray and care at an orthopaedic clinic. Those who didn’t have a buckle fracture or fractured arm were discharged from hospital without the need for further imaging.

Professor Ware said children who had an ultrasound initially had fewer x-rays, and shorter stays in the ED. “Families were also more satisfied with the treatment they received,” he said. “The results are promising and have wider implications beyond in hospital diagnosis and follow up care.

“By using a bedside ultrasound, this frees up the x-ray machine for patients who really need it and can potentially be a cost-cutting measure for hospitals as they reduce the number of x-rays without comprising the safety of patients.

“It also would be extremely beneficial in rural or remote areas eliminating the need for children and their families to travel to a larger hospital for an x-ray.”

Source: Griffith University

Vorasidenib Extends Progression-free Survival in Glioma Subtype

Photo by National Cancer Institute on Unsplash

In a study published in the New England Journal of Medicine, scientists report that a new targeted therapy drug can extend progression-free survival for a subtype of glioma. The finding suggests a possible new treatment option for people with the slow-growing but deadly brain tumour.

The team, co-led by UCLA, found the drug vorasidenib more than doubled progression-free survival in people with recurrent grade 2 glioma with IDH1 and IDH2 mutations. Compared with placebo, those who took vorasidenib went for nearly 17 more months without their cancer worsening, delaying the time before they needed to begin chemotherapy and radiation.

The type of glioma studied in the paper, recurrent grade 2 glioma with IDH1 and IDH2 mutations, tends to affect younger people, often those in their 30s. The current standard treatment, a combination of radiation and chemotherapy, can cause neurological deficits that make it hard for patients in an often challenging and busy stage of life.

UCLA professor of neuro-oncology Dr Timothy Cloughesy, co-senior author of the study, said that the availability of a treatment that enables patients to go for longer periods of time between chemotherapy and radiation treatments could have a major impact.

“We’re always concerned about the delayed effects of radiation,” said Cloughesy. “Having the ability to hold off on getting radiation therapy to the brain with an effective therapy is really critical and very meaningful to this population of patients.”

Vorasidenib is a dual inhibitor of mutant IDH1/2, meaning that it prevents the formation and accumulation of the onco-metabolite 2-Hydroxyglutarate, or 2-HG, that occurs when genetically altered versions of two enzymes, IDH1 and IDH2, are present in a tumour. 2-HG is thought to be responsible for the formation and maintenance of IDH-mutant gliomas.

The study is also the first clinical trial to analyse a targeted therapy drug specifically developed to treat brain cancer. Targeted therapies focus on specific molecules that are involved in cancer cell growth and metastasis. Unlike chemotherapy and other therapies that can affect both cancerous and healthy cells, targeted therapies only attack cancer cells with the mutated target while sparing normal cells.

While there has been great progress in using targeted therapies to treat many types of cancer, the difficulty of crossing the blood-brain barrier makes developing targeted therapies for brain tumours challenging. Vorasidenib is a brain-penetrant inhibitor, allowing it to cross the blood-brain barrier.

The study involved 331 people aged 12 and older who had been diagnosed with recurrent grade 2 glioma with the IDH1 and IDH2 mutations and who had undergone brain tumour surgery. From that group, 168 were randomised to vorasidenib and 163 to placebo.

Among those who received vorasidenib, the disease did not progress for an average of 27.7 months, significantly longer than the 11.1 months for those who received the placebo. And among those who received vorasidenib, 85.6% went for 18 months before their next treatment, while 83.4% went for 24 months between treatments.

The disease progressed in just 28% of people receiving v orasidenib, compared to 54% of those receiving placebos. And as of September 2022, which was 30 months after the study began, 72% of patients who were in the vorasidenib group were still taking the drug and their disease had not progressed.

For patients who were originally in the placebo group whose cancer began to progress during the study, doctors permitted a switch to vorasidenib. The researchers observed limited adverse side effects from vorasidenib. “This is the first targeted treatment that shows unequivocal efficacy in this population and is precedent-setting for this disease,” Cloughesy said.

Source: University of California – Los Angeles Health Sciences

Study Tests a Simple, Personalised Approach to Tinnitus Treatment

Photo by Dylann Hendricks on Unsplash

A recent study published in JAMA Network Open suggests that relief might be possible for debilitating cases of tinnitus by using a bi-sensory approach, combining mild but bothersome electrical stimulation with sound.

The study, by researchers at the University of Michigan’s Kresge Hearing Research Institute, was based on research into the processing of bi-sensory information, which could be used for personalised stimulation to treat tinnitus.

In a double-blind, randomised clinical trial, researchers recruited 99 individuals with somatic tinnitus, which 70% of tinnitus sufferers have. In this form, movements such as clenching the jaw, or applying pressure to the forehead, cause a noticeable change in pitch or loudness of experienced sounds.

Susan Shore, PhD, Professor Emerita in Michigan Medicine’s Department of Otolaryngology and U-M’s Departments of Physiology and Biomedical Engineering, led the research, in which candidates with bothersome, somatic tinnitus, as well as normal-to-moderate hearing loss, were eligible to participate.

“After enrolment, participants received a portable device developed and manufactured by in2being, LLC, for in-home use,” she said. “The devices were programmed to present each participant’s personal tinnitus spectrum, which was combined with electrical stimulation to form a bi-sensory stimulus, while maintaining participant and study team blinding.”

Study participants were randomly assigned to one of two groups. The active group received bi-sensory treatment first, while the control group received sound-only treatment first.

For the first six weeks, participants were instructed to use their devices for 30 minutes each day. The next six weeks gave participants a break from daily use, followed by six more weeks of the treatment not received in the beginning of the study.

Participants completed the Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI), and Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI) to measure the daily impact of tinnitus. Participants also had their tinnitus loudness assessed during this time.

The team found that when participants received the bi-sensory treatment, they consistently reported improved quality of life, lower handicap scores and significant reductions in tinnitus loudness. These effects were not seen in the control group.

Additionally, more than 60% of participants reported significantly reduced tinnitus symptoms after the six weeks of active – treatment, but not for the control. This matches earlier work from Shore’s team, which showed that the longer participants received active treatment, the greater the reduction in their tinnitus symptoms.

“This study paves the way for the use of personalised, bi-sensory stimulation as an effective treatment for tinnitus, providing hope for millions of tinnitus sufferers,” said Shore.

Source: Michigan Medicine – University of Michigan