Category: Diet and Nutrition

Going Vegetarian may be Down to Genetics

Photo by Brad West on Unsplash

A person’s genetic makeup plays a role in determining whether they can stick to a strict vegetarian diet, a new study has found. The findings, published in PLOS ONE, open the door to further studies that could have important implications regarding dietary recommendations and the production of meat substitutes. It is the first fully peer-reviewed and indexed study to look at the association between genetics and strict vegetarianism.

“Are all humans capable of subsisting long term on a strict vegetarian diet? This is a question that has not been seriously studied,”said corresponding study author Dr. Nabeel Yaseen, professor emeritus of pathology at Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine.

A large proportion (about 48 to 64%) of self-identified “vegetarians” report eating fish, poultry and/or red meat, which Yaseen said suggests environmental or biological constraints override the desire to adhere to a vegetarian diet.

“It seems there are more people who would like to be vegetarian than actually are, and we think it’s because there is something hard-wired here that people may be missing.”

Several genes involved in lipid metabolism, brain function

To determine whether genetics contribute to one’s ability to adhere to a vegetarian diet, the scientists compared UK Biobank genetic data from 5 324 strict vegetarians (consuming no fish, poultry or red meat) to 329 455 controls. All study participants were white Caucasian to attain a homogeneous sample and avoid confounding by ethnicity.

The study identified three genes that are significantly associated with vegetarianism and another 31 genes that are potentially associated. Several of these genes, including two of the top three (NPC1 and RMC1), are involved in lipid (fat) metabolism and/or brain function, the study found.

“One area in which plant products differ from meat is complex lipids,” Yaseen said. “My speculation is there may be lipid component(s) present in meat that some people need. And maybe people whose genetics favor vegetarianism are able to synthesize these components endogenously. However, at this time, this is mere speculation and much more work needs to be done to understand the physiology of vegetarianism.”

Why do most people eat meat?

Religious and moral considerations have been major motivations behind adopting a vegetarian diet, and recent research has provided evidence for its health benefits. And although vegetarianism is increasing in popularity, vegetarians remain a small minority of people worldwide. For example, in the US, vegetarians comprise approximately 3 to 4% of the population. In the UK, 2.3% of adults and 1.9% of children are vegetarian.

This raises the question of why most people still prefer to eat meat products. The driving factor for food and drink preference is not just taste, but also how an individual’s body metabolises it, Yaseen said. For example, when trying alcohol or coffee for the first time, most people would not find them pleasurable, but over time, one develops a taste because of how alcohol or caffeine makes them feel.

“I think with meat, there’s something similar,” Yaseen said. “Perhaps you have a certain component – I’m speculating a lipid component – that makes you need it and crave it.”

If genetics influence whether someone chooses to be a vegetarian, what does that mean for those who don’t eat meat for religious or moral reasons?

“While religious and moral considerations certainly play a major role in the motivation to adopt a vegetarian diet, our data suggest that the ability to adhere to such a diet is constrained by genetics,” Yaseen said. “We hope that future studies will lead to a better understanding of the physiologic differences between vegetarians and non-vegetarians, thus enabling us to provide personalized dietary recommendations and to produce better meat substitutes.”

Source: Northwestern University

Activists Meet to Discuss Worsening Food Crisis for Children

Photo by Thought Catalog on Unsplash

A group of activists for food access and affordability met yesterday (Thursday 21 September 2023) to discuss the worsening food crisis for children. Convened by the Nelson Mandela Children’s Fund and the DG Murray Trust, the meeting sought to identify urgent measures to combat rising rates of severe acute malnutrition and child hunger.

The activist group includes representatives of COSATU, the South African Council of Churches, civil
society groups and academics. It endorsed the proposal by the DG Murray Trust and the Grow Great Zero-Stunting Campaign for government and the food industry to contribute equally in making at least one product label of ten highly nutritious foods far more affordable to poorer households. This proposal requests food manufacturers and retailers to ‘double discount’ a list of ten best buy foods, with the amount of profit waived by industry matched by a retail subsidy by government.

“Data from the Department of Health shows that there were over 15 000 cases of severe acute malnutrition requiring hospitalisation in the 2022/3 financial year,” says Dr Linda Ncube Nkomo, CEO of the Nelson Mandela Children’s Fund. “But that is just the tip of the iceberg”, she says. “Malnutrition is the underlying cause of about one-third of all child deaths in South Africa today, this despite Section 28 of the Constitution which guarantees the right of nutrition to every child”.

The problem of acute malnutrition worsens the chronically high levels of food insecurity in South Africa,
with over a quarter of children under five nutritionally stunted. Poor physical growth is just one manifestation of much deeper damage being done to the life-long wellbeing of children, not least to their brain development,” says Dr Edzani Mphaphuli, Executive Director of the Grow Great zero-stunting campaign. “If we don’t stop stunting now,” Mphaphuli continues, “we shouldn’t expect learning outcomes to improve or our economy to grow.”

In addition to the double-discounted basket of ten best buys, the group called on the food formula industry to stop extracting massive profits from the poorest mothers, whose own malnutrition makes breastfeeding difficult. Given the high cost of infant formula, desperate mothers water down the milk to make it stretch further, which means that their babies don’t get enough protein and vitamins. It also called on government to ensure that every province has an effective programme in place to identify children at high risk and to provide nutritional supplementation to children failing to thrive.

The group undertook to monitor food prices actively and to challenge the food industry to make the third of young children who live below the food poverty line their responsibility too. “We are heartened that NEDLAC has tasked a multi-sectoral committee to review the viability of proposal to double-discount ten best buy foods”, says Dr David Harrison, CEO of the DG Murray Trust. “No sector of society – not government, not labour, not civil society nor industry – should be able to say that substantive proposals to feed South Africa’s children are too difficult, without putting a better option on the table.”

Almonds Help Weight Loss and Improve Cardiometabolic Health

Photo by Pavel Kalenik on Unsplash

Diets often recommend avoiding nuts as they contain a large amount of fat even though they are high in protein and fibre. Now, a large study published in the journal Obesity demonstrated that including almonds in an energy restricted diet not only helped participants to lose weight, but also improved their cardiometabolic health.

Examining the effects of energy restricted diets supplemented with Californian almonds or with carbohydrate- rich snacks, researchers found that both diets successfully reduced body weight by about 7kg.

Globally, more than 1.9 billion adults are overweight (650 million with obesity). Two in three people (approximately 12.5 million adults) are overweight or have obesity, as do one in every two South Africans.

UniSA researcher Dr Sharayah Carter says the study demonstrates how nuts can support a healthy diet for weight management and cardiometabolic health.

“Nuts, like almonds, are a great snack. They’re high in protein, fibre, and packed with vitamins and minerals, but they also have a high fat content which people can associate with increased body weight,” Dr Carter says.

“Nuts contain unsaturated fats – or healthy fats – which can improve blood cholesterol levels, ease inflammation, and contribute to a healthy heart.

“In this study we examined the effects of an almond-supplemented diet with a nut-free diet to identify any influence on weight and cardiometabolic outcomes.

“Both the nut and nut free diets resulted in approximately 9.3% reduction in body weight over the trial.

“Yet the almond-supplemented diets also demonstrated statistically significant changes in some highly atherogenic lipoprotein subfractions, which may lead to improved cardiometabolic health in the longer term.

“Additionally, nuts have the added benefit of making you feel fuller for longer, which is always a pro when you’re trying to manage your weight.”

The study, funded by the Almond Board of California, had 106 participants complete a 9-month eating program (a three-month energy-restricted diet for weight loss in Phase 1, followed by Phase 2, a six-month energy-controlled diet for weight maintenance). In both phases, 15% of participants’ energy intake comprised unsalted whole almonds with skins (for the nut diet) or 15% carbohydrate-rich snacks – such as rice crackers or baked cereal bars (for the nut-free diet).

Reductions occurred in fasting glucose (−0.2mmol/L), insulin (−8.1pmol/L), blood pressure (−4.9 mmHg systolic, −5.0mmHg diastolic), total cholesterol (−0.3 mmol/L), low-density lipoprotein (LDL) (−0.2mmol/L), very low-density lipoprotein (−0.1mmol/L), and triglycerides (−0.3mmol/L), and high-density lipoprotein increased (0.1mmol/L) by the end of Phase 2 in both groups.

Source: University of South Australia

Diet Extremes of Carbohydrate and Fat Tied to Sex-specific Mortality Risks

Photo by I Yunmai on Unsplash

New research suggests that extreme dietary habits involving carbohydrates and fats affect life expectancy. Results published in The Journal of Nutrition show that a low carbohydrate intake in men and a high carbohydrate intake in women are associated with a higher risk of all-cause and cancer-related mortality and that women with higher fat intake may have a lower risk of all-cause mortality. Their findings suggest that people should pursue a balanced diet rather than heavily restricting their carbohydrate or fat intake.

While low-carbohydrate and low-fat diets are becoming popular as a way to promote weight loss and improve blood glucose levels, their long-term effects on life expectancy are less clear. Interestingly, recent studies conducted in Western countries suggest that extreme dietary habits for carbohydrates and fats are associated with a higher risk of mortality. However, few studies have explored these associations in East Asian populations, including Japanese individuals who typically have relatively low fat and high-carbohydrate dietary intakes.

Researchers from Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine in Japan led by Dr Takashi Tamura conducted a follow-up survey over a period of 9 years with 81 333 Japanese people (34,893 men and 46 440 women) to evaluate the association between carbohydrate and fat intakes and the risk of mortality. Daily dietary intakes of carbohydrates, fats, and total energy were estimated using a food frequency questionnaire and calculated as a percentage of total energy intake for carbohydrates and fats. Carbohydrate intake quality (ie, refined compared with minimally processed carbohydrate intake) and fat intake quality (ie, saturated compared with unsaturated fat intake) were also assessed to examine the impact of food quality on the association with mortality.

They found that men who consumed less than 40% of their total energy from carbohydrates experienced significantly higher risks of all-cause and cancer-related mortality. The trend was observed regardless of whether refined or minimally processed carbohydrate were considered. On the other hand, among women with 5 years or longer of follow-up, those with a high carbohydrate intake of more than 65% had a higher risk of all-cause mortality. No clear association was observed between refined or minimally processed carbohydrate intake and the risk of mortality in women.

For fats, men with a high fat intake of more than 35% of their total energy from fats had a higher risk of cancer-related mortality. They also found that a low intake of unsaturated fat in men was associated with a higher risk of all-cause and cancer-related mortality. In contrast, total fat intake and saturated fat intake in women showed an inverse association with the risk of all-cause and cancer-related mortality. They concluded that this finding does not support the idea that high fat intake is detrimental to longevity in women.

“The finding that saturated fat intake was inversely associated with the risk of mortality only in women might partially explain the differences in the associations between the sexes,” Dr Tamura stated. “Alternatively, components other than fat in the food sources of fat may be responsible for the observed inverse association between fat intake and mortality in women.”

This study is extremely important because restricting carbohydrates and fats, such as extremely low-carbohydrate and low-fat diets, are now popular dieting strategies aimed at improving health, including the management of metabolic syndrome. However, this study shows that low-carbohydrate and low-fat diets may not be the healthiest strategy for promoting longevity, as their short-term benefits could potentially be outweighed by long-term risk.

Overall, an unfavourable association with mortality was observed for low-carbohydrate intake in men and for high carbohydrate intake in women, whereas high fat intake could be associated with a lower mortality risk in women. The findings suggest that individuals should carefully consider how to balance their diet and ensure that they are taking in energy from a variety of food sources, while avoiding extremes.

Source: Nagoya University

Could a Simple Dietary Change Increase Platelet Counts?

Scanning electron micrograph of red blood cells, T cells (orange) and platelets (green). Source: Wikimedia CC0

Aside from transfusions, there currently is no way to boost people’s platelet counts, which can drop for reasons such as chemotherapy, leaving them at risk for uncontrolled bleeding. But new research published in Nature Cardiovascular Research suggests that there could be a simple alternative: a dietary change in type of fat intake could raise platelet counts in people with low levels.

A study led by Kellie Machlus, PhD, and Maria Barrachina, PhD at Boston Children’s Hospital found that they could raise platelet counts in mice by feeding them polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) like those found in the Mediterranean diet. In contrast, mice fed a diet high in saturated fatty acids had decreased platelet counts.

“We were honestly surprised at how profound the effects were,” says Machlus, whose lab focuses on studying platelets and their precursor cells, megakaryocytes, and ways to get the body to increase platelet production.

But equally interesting is the apparent reason for the dietary effect.

“What brought me to the idea of diet is that megakaryocytes make these long extensions from their membrane when they form platelets,” Machlus says. “We thought the membrane must have an unusual composition to make it so fluid.”

A fluid megakaryocyte membrane

No one had studied megakaryocyte membranes before, perhaps because megakaryocytes are in the bone marrow and hard to access. Machlus, Barrachina, and their colleagues decided to comprehensively assess the membranes’ fat content with lipidomics.

“We found that PUFAs are enriched in megakaryocytes, especially right before they begin making platelets,” says Machlus. “We think they provide the fluidity necessary for the membrane to move and reshape.”

In culture, the megakaryocytes with higher amounts of PUFAs in their membrane made more platelets. When the cells were instead supplied with saturated fats as their lipid source, platelet production declined. The same thing happened when the team added compounds to inhibit uptake of PUFAs from the blood.

The researchers also identified one of the receptors on megakaryocytes that’s responsible for taking up PUFAs from blood: CD36. When they deleted the gene for CD36 in their mouse model, the animals had low platelet counts.

Serendipitously, the researchers were able to connect the dots to humans. Through a colleague in the U.K., they identified a family in which several members had a mutation in the CD36 gene. Those affected had low platelet counts and, in the mother’s case, bleeding episodes.

An olive oil intervention?

Intrigued by their findings, Barrachina hopes to extend the study by collaborating with a team in her native Spain. The team is studying dietary interventions for cardiovascular disease, including the Mediterranean diet.

“We want to look at platelets from these patients,” she says. She thinks that platelets with more saturated fatty acids in their membranes might be in a more activated state that could lead them to aggregate and form blood clots.

While Machlus thinks it may be worth encouraging patients with thrombocytopenia to consume more olive oil to increase PUFA levels, she recognises that a drug treatment may be more practical.

“Our next steps are to find out the enzymes that create PUFAs,” she says. “Maybe we can target them to make more platelets.”

Source: Boston Children’s Hospital

‘Berry’ Good for You? Adding a Banana Reduces Flavanol Levels in Smoothies

Photo by Denis Tuksar on Unsplash

Smoothies can be a tasty and convenient way to get the important fruits and vegetables needed for a healthy diet. But is a banana and blueberry smoothie the best combo? Researchers at the University of California, Davis, suggest that blending certain ingredients in smoothies can influence whether your body is getting a nutritional boost.

The study, published today in the journal Food and Function, used smoothies to test how various levels of polyphenol oxidase (PPO), an enzyme in many fruits and vegetables, affects the levels of flavanols in food to be absorbed by the body. Flavanols are a group of bioactive compounds that are good for your heart and cognitive health and are naturally found in apples, pears, blueberries, blackberries, grapes and cocoa – common smoothie ingredients.

“We sought to understand, on a very practical level, how a common food and food preparation like a banana-based smoothie could affect the availability of flavanols to be absorbed after intake,” said lead author Javier Ottaviani, director of the Core Laboratory of Mars Edge, which is part of Mars, Inc., and an adjunct researcher with the UC Davis Department of Nutrition. Mars Inc. provided the grant for this study as part of its research into flavonols in cocoa.

When peeled or sliced, PPO causes banana or apple to turn brown, The browning occurs when food with PPO is exposed to air, cut or bruised. The researchers wanted to know whether consuming freshly prepared smoothies made with different PPO-containing fruits impacted the amount of flavanols available to the body.

Bananas versus berries

The researchers had participants drink a smoothie made with banana, which has naturally high PPO activity, and a smoothie made with mixed berries, which have naturally low PPO activity. Participants also took a flavanol capsule as a control. Blood and urine samples were analysed to measure how much flavanols were present in the body after ingesting the smoothie samples and capsule. The researchers found that those who drank the banana smoothie had 84% lower levels of flavanols in their body compared to the control.

“We were really surprised to see how quickly adding a single banana decreased the level of flavanols in the smoothie and the levels of flavanol absorbed in the body,” Ottaviani said. “This highlights how food preparation and combinations can affect the absorption of dietary compounds in foods.”

Last year, the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics issued a dietary recommendation, advising people to consume 400 to 600 milligrams of flavanols daily for cardiometabolic health. Ottaviani said for people who are trying to consume those flavanols, they should consider preparing smoothies by combining flavanol-rich fruits like berries with other ingredients that also have a low PPO activity like pineapple, oranges, mango or yogurt.

He also said bananas remain a great fruit to be eaten or consumed in smoothies. For those who want to consume smoothies with bananas, or other high PPO activity fruits and vegetables such as beet greens, the suggestion is to not combine them with flavanol-rich fruits such as berries, grapes and cocoa.

The findings of this study could spur future research into how other foods are prepared and the effects on flavanols, for example, Ottaviani said tea is a major dietary source of flavanols and depending on how it is prepared, a different amount of flavanols would be available for absorption.

“This is certainly an area that deserves more attention in the field of polyphenols and bioactive compounds in general,” said Ottaviani.

Jodi Ensunsa, Reedmond Fong, Jennifer Kimball and Alan Crozier, all affiliated with the UC Davis Department of Nutrition and researchers affiliated with the UC Davis Department of Internal Medicine, University of Reading, King Saud University and Mars, Inc. contributed to the research.

The study was funded by a research grant from Mars, Inc., which collaborates with researchers to study potential benefits of cocoa flavanols for human health.

Source: University of California – Davis

Yeast Studies Suggest that Early Diet may be Key for Lifelong Health

Photo by Patrick Fore on Unsplash

Researchers at the Babraham Institute are proposing an alternative link between diet and ageing based on studies in yeast. In a study using yeast, a useful model organism to study ageing, researchers showed that a ‘healthier’ galactose diet in early life led to reduced senescence in those cells. The findings, published in PLOS Biology, suggest that dietary makeup at a young age may have a long-lasting impact on health throughout the lifespan.

Dr Jon Houseley and his team have published their experiments, showing that healthy ageing is achievable through dietary change without restriction by potentially optimising diet, and that ill-health is not an inevitable part of the ageing process.

Scientists have long known that caloric restriction improves health in later life and may even extend life. However, studies in mice show that caloric restriction really needs to be maintained throughout life to achieve this impact, and the health benefits disappear when a normal diet is resumed. Dr Houseley’s new research conducted in yeast suggests an alternative to calorie restriction can lead to improved health through the lifecycle.

“We show that diet in early life can switch yeast onto a healthier trajectory. By giving yeast a different diet without restricting calories we were able to suppress senescence, when cells no longer divide, and loss of fitness in aged cells.” Said Dr Dorottya Horkai, lead researcher on the study.

Rather than growing yeast on their usual glucose-rich diet, the researchers swapped their diet to galactose and observed that many molecular changes which normally accompany ageing did not occur. The cells grown on galactose remained just as fit as young cells even late in life, despite not living any longer, showing that the period of ill-health towards the end of life was dramatically reduced.

“Crucially, the dietary change only works when cells are young, and actually diet makes little difference in old yeast. It is hard to translate what youth means between yeast and humans, but all these studies point to the same trend – to live a long and healthy life, a healthy diet from an early age makes a difference.” explains Dr Houseley.

Yeast are good model organisms for studying ageing as they share many of the same cellular machinery as animals and humans. This avenue of research in yeast helps us to seek a more achievable way to improve healthy ageing though diet compared to sustained and severe calorie restriction, although more research is needed.

Source: Babraham Institute

Study Tries Roasting out The Toxicants in Coffee

Photo by Mike Kenneally on Unsplash

Coffee is one of the world’s most popular beverages, but it also has potential health concerns, one of which is the production of foodborne toxicants such as acrylamide and furan during roasting process. A study published in Beverage Plant Research investigated ways to mitigate both contaminants in coffee by changing roasting parameters, including special procedures.

A study analysed a Vietnam Robusta grade 2 and a Brazil Arabica (unwashed) coffee with different roasting profiles (tangential, drum and hot air roasting) and roast degrees (light, medium and dark roast). Researchers accurately measured the acrylamide and furan derivative content in the samples by GC-MS. They found that acrylamide contents were highest in light roasts, and the content of furan and methylfurans were low in light roasts for both the Robusta and Arabica samples.

In addition, the study also explored the impact of special roasts, such as double roast or roasting with a sudden temperature change on acrylamide and furan content. The results showed that special roasts had no significant effect on the two contaminants. To sum up, these findings suggest that the coffee type and roasting process significantly influence the levels of these toxicants. Simultaneous mitigation of the effects of acrylamide and furan/methylfuran by changing the roasting parameters is not possible.

In conclusion, the research results show that both the type of coffee and its roasting profile have a substantial impact on the levels of acrylamide and furan, highlighting the possibility of regulating these toxicants through controlled roasting processes. However, simultaneous mitigation of these toxicants seems to be impossible. This study holds significant implications for the future of coffee production, potentially paving the way for safer and healthier consumption practices.

Source: EurekAlert!

Study Shows a Link Between Sugar-sweetened Beverages and Liver Cancer

Photo by Breakingpic on Pexels

One of the first studies to look at the association between intake of sugar-sweetened beverages, artificially sweetened beverages, and incidence of liver cancer and chronic liver disease mortality, has found an 85% increase in liver cancer incidence between postmenopausal women who consume one sweetened drink per day and those who consume them rarely. Results from the study, which was led by Brigham and Women’s Hospital, are published in JAMA.

“To our knowledge, this is the first study to report an association between sugar sweetened beverage intake and chronic liver disease mortality,” said first author Longgang Zhao, PhD, of the Brigham’s Channing Division of Network Medicine. Zhao is a postdoctoral researcher who works with senior author Xuehong Zhang, MBBS, ScD, in the Channing Division. “Our findings, if confirmed, may pave the way to a public health strategy to reduce risk of liver disease based on data from a large and geographically diverse cohort.”

This observational study included nearly 100 000 postmenopausal women from the large, prospective Women’s Health Initiative study. Participants reported their usual soft drink, fruit drink (not including fruit juice) consumption, and then reported artificially sweetened beverage consumption after three years. Participants were followed for a median of more than 20 years. Researchers looked at self-reported liver cancer incidence and death due to chronic liver disease such as fibrosis, cirrhosis, or chronic hepatitis, which were further verified by medical records or the National Death Index.

A total of 98 786 postmenopausal women were included in the final analyses. The 6.8% of women who consumed one or more sugar-sweetened beverages daily had an 85% higher risk of liver cancer and 68% higher risk of chronic liver disease mortality compared to those who had fewer than three sugar sweetened beverages per month. No such increase was observed for consumption of artificially-sweetened beverages.

The authors note that the study was observational, and causality cannot be inferred, and relied on self-reported responses about intake, sugar content and outcomes. More studies are needed to validate this risk association and determine why the sugary drinks appeared to increase risk of liver cancer and disease. Furthermore, more research is needed to elucidate the potential mechanisms by integrating genetics, preclinical and experimental studies, and -omics data.

Source: Mass General Brigham

Most Artificial Sweeteners Linked to Abdominal and Intramuscular Fat Increases

Source: Pixabay CC0

Artificial sweeteners have once again returned to the headlines with the WHO listing them as a possible carcinogen, Now, a long-term study on artificial sweeteners in diets published in the International Journal of Obesity has shown that, ironically, nearly all of them are linked to increased adiposity.

In the two decade long study, University of Minnesota researchers examined people’s regular dietary intake, with a focus on non-nutritive sweeteners commonly found in artificial sweeteners. They found that long-term consumption of aspartame, saccharin and diet beverages were linked to increased abdominal and intramuscular adiposity. However, the study found no significant association between the artificial sweetener sucralose and these measures of fat volume.

“This study showed that habitual, long-term intake of total and individual artificial sweetener intakes are related to greater volumes of adipose tissue, commonly known as body fat,” said Brian Steffen, PhD, MSCR, a professor in the Department of Surgery at the U of M Medical School and co-investigator on the funded grant. “This was found even after accounting for other factors, including how much a person eats or the quality of one’s diet.”

The study’s findings raise concerns about the recommendations from the American Diabetes Association and the American Heart Association that promote the replacement of added sugars with artificial sweeteners. Based on their results, the researchers recommend considering alternative approaches, as long-term artificial sweetener consumption may have potential health consequences.

“This is an especially timely study, given the World Health Organization’s recent warning of the potential health risks of aspartame,” said Lyn Steffen, PhD, MPH, a professor in the School of Public Health and principal investigator on the study. “These findings underscore the importance of finding alternatives to artificial sweeteners in foods and beverages, especially since these added sweeteners may have negative health consequences.”

The researchers say that more studies are needed to better understand the connection between artificial sweetener intake and increased body fat. Further research is warranted to explore the underlying mechanisms and gain clearer insights into how dietary habits affect metabolic health.

Source: University of Minnesota Medical School