Tag: sugar

Cutting Sugar Intake in Antibiotic Treatment may Help Protect the Gut Microbiome

Researchers analysed more than 9400 meals and 1000 stool samples, linking sugar-rich foods to greater antibiotic-related microbiome disruption in stem cell transplant patients.

Photo by Patrick Fore on Unsplash

Treatment with antibiotics often causes stomach cramps and diarrhoea, broadly destroying good bacteria in the gut, allowing the overgrowth of harmful microbes. A new study involving City of Hope researchers suggests eating less sugar could protect the microbiome during antibiotic treatment. The study followed patients with blood cancer who were going through an intensive treatment called allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant, a population at particularly high risk for severe gut microbiome disruption and associated side effects.

Published in Nature, the surprising findings connect to the idea of “food as medicine” during cancer care and the ways diet can help us prevent and recover from illness. The research could lead to new treatment strategies for cancer patients and potentially others taking antibiotics.

“Antibiotics disrupt the diversity of our gut bacteria, or microbiomes, which play an essential role in supporting our immune systems and overall health,” said co-senior author Marcel van den Brink, MD, PhD, president of City of Hope Los Angeles and City of Hope chief physician executive. “Our research supports emerging evidence that avoiding sugary foods during antibiotic treatment may protect the microbiome. Preserving microbiome diversity has previously been linked with improved clinical outcomes for patients with cancer.”

Dr van den Brink, a globally recognised leader in the microbiome, cell transplantation and cancer immunotherapy, collaborated on the research with Jonathan Peled, MD, PhD, at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Jonas Schluter, PhD, at NYU’s Grossman School of Medicine.

A Large Clinical Study With High-Frequency Data

The five-year study, one of the largest of its kind, followed patients who were hospitalised for several weeks to receive intensive chemotherapy, sometimes with radiation, to wipe out their immune systems and then undergo a stem cell transplant. To prevent and treat infections, each patient took at least one antibiotic during their hospital stay, with 80% of them taking one or more of the broad-spectrum antibiotics that exert the strongest effect on the microbiome by targeting many types of bacteria.

The research team tracked 9419 meals eaten by 173 hospitalised patients and profiled the microbiome diversity in stool samples from 158 patients. Microbiome diversity is a key indicator of a healthy microbiome.

Precisely Measuring Food in Real Time and Tracking Effects in the Gut

Each time patients ordered a meal from the hospital kitchen, the tray arrived with a questionnaire asking them to record the amount of each item that they ate and drank.

With this help from the hospital kitchen to track nutritional information for all hospital meals consumed, the scientists recorded more than 40,000 food items, creating an unprecedented dataset with a level of detail that’s rarely possible in nutrition research.

For each patient, the researchers tracked between eight and 128 meals across a period ranging from 12 days before to 49 days after transplantation. The team also analysed more than 1000 patient stool samples to monitor changes in the gut microbiome.

“Unlike past nutrition studies that rely on patients’ memories of what they ate or other imprecise surveys, we had meticulous dietary records collected in real time,” noted Dr van den Brink. “This enabled us to look for patterns that otherwise might be impossible to detect.”

A Striking Discovery: Sugar Upsets the Balance of Gut Bacteria

Using a variety of advanced statistical models, the researchers scoured the data in search of patterns linked to injury to the gut microbiome.

What they found surprised them.

“No matter how we analysed the data, the same strong signal kept appearing,” observed Dr van den Brink. “The patients who consumed more sweets while taking antibiotics were more likely to experience a loss of microbiome diversity as aggressive microbes crowded out other strains of bacteria.”

One organism stood out: Enterococcus. When it takes over the microbiome, patients undergoing transplant face a higher risk of bloodstream infections, graft-versus-host disease and other life-threatening complications.

The combination of high-sugar foods and broad-spectrum antibiotics appeared to multiply injury to the microbiome, leading to a substantial 24% drop in bacterial diversity for every 100-gram increase in sweets (equivalent in sugar content to a large milkshake).

Replicating the Results in Mice Supports Human Data

The researchers also tested their hypothesis that sugar exacerbates microbiome injury by giving broad-spectrum antibiotics to healthy mice and feeding them a variety of diets. Mice that ate a high-sucrose diet quickly developed an overgrowth of Enterococcus in their guts. Mice that ate the high-sugar diet without antibiotics, however, maintained normal bacterial diversity.

“The fact that animal studies support associations we found in patient data provides a compelling rationale for future clinical trials to evaluate whether reducing sugar intake during antibiotic use would protect the microbiome,” said Dr van den Brink, the Deana and Steve Campbell Physician Executive Distinguished Chair and the Morgan and Helen Chu Presidential Chair.

What the Findings Could Mean for Patients

“The microbiome is emerging as an important factor in cancer care,” Dr van den Brink said. “The better we understand what supports and disrupts it, the more opportunities we have to reduce treatment side effects while improving how patients respond to and recover from therapy.”

For cancer patients, he noted, the study results reinforce diet as a strong influence on the microbiome and as one of the most practical ways hospitals can support recovery during treatment.

“Many of the foods and drinks we encourage hospitalised patients to consume, like nutritional shakes, smoothies and sports drinks, are high in sugar content,” Dr van den Brink said. “That’s something we’ll need to evaluate when prescribing antibiotics.”

The practical takeaway for physicians, he says, is that antibiotic stewardship matters beyond preventing antibiotic resistance.

“Antibiotic stewardship includes thinking about how different antibiotics affect the microbiome,” Dr van den Brink said. “Our study demonstrates that some antibiotics disrupt beneficial gut bacteria more than others.”

To preserve microbiome health, he encourages patients to ask their healthcare team to ensure antibiotics are thoughtfully chosen from equally effective treatment options for controlling infections.

So, should people cut out sugar while taking antibiotics?

“It’s premature to recommend everyone taking antibiotics avoid sugar,” Dr van den Brink said. “On the other hand, we don’t have strong evidence that probiotics help preserve or restore microbiome diversity and many people choose to take them anyway. There’s no harm in limiting sugar in your diet, and it’s an easy thing to try.”

Original written by Elaine Schmidt

Source: City of Hope

Cutting Out Sucrose from the Diet May Disrupt Gut Microbiome

Photo by Sharon Mccutcheon on Unsplash

Eliminating sugar from your diet may be more detrimental than previously thought, according to an animal study being presented Saturday at ENDO 2026, the Endocrine Society’s annual meeting in Chicago, Ill.

“Completely removing sucrose from a low-fat diet may unexpectedly disrupt gut health and promote inflammation and metabolic dysfunction, highlighting that balanced nutrition is more important than simply eliminating sugar,” said Rasheed Ahmad, PhD, principal scientist and head of the Immunology & Microbiology Department at the Dasman Diabetes Institute, in Kuwait City, Kuwait. The institute was founded by Kuwait Foundation for the Advancement of Sciences. Researchers investigated the effects of a sucrose-free low-fat diet compared to a sucrose-containing low-fat control diet in two groups of mice for 16 weeks. 

They evaluated glucose tolerance, insulin sensitivity, circulating metabolic hormones, the gut microbiome and inflammation in the colon and liver.

Mice fed the sucrose-free diet developed impaired glucose control, insulin resistance, gut microbial imbalance, intestinal inflammation and fatty liver changes, despite having no significant differences in body weight compared with control mice. 

“The findings suggest that complete removal of sucrose from a low-fat diet may negatively affect gut microbiota and metabolic health,” Ahmad said. “The study highlights the importance of maintaining balanced dietary carbohydrates to support gut and immune homeostasis.” 

Until now, the consequences of restrictive diets that eliminate sugar from a low-fat diet were unknown.

“This research may influence future dietary recommendations by emphasizing the importance of maintaining a healthy gut microbiome rather than focusing only on sugar restriction,” Ahmad said. “In the long term, these findings could help improve strategies for preventing and managing metabolic disorders, fatty liver disease and chronic inflammatory conditions.”

“Studies such as this reflect our institute’s commitment to advancing evidence-based scientific discoveries that improve public health outcomes and deepen our understanding of metabolic disease,” said Faisal Hamed Al-Refaei, MD, Acting Director General of Dasman Diabetes Institute.

Source: Endocrine Society

Changing a Diet’s Sweetness has no Impact on Sweet Cravings or Health

Photo by Amit Lahav on Unsplash

Changing the amount of sweetness in a person’s diet has no impact on their liking for sweet foods, the results of a new trial suggest. The results also showed no difference in indicators of cardiovascular disease or diabetes risk between people who increased or decreased their intake of sweet-tasting foods over a six-month period. 

The research team suggest that consequently public health organisations may need to change their current advice on reducing sweet food consumption to tackle the obesity crisis.  

The study, published in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, was carried out by Wageningen University and Research in the Netherlands and Bournemouth University in the UK.

“People have a natural love of sweet taste which has led many organisations, including the World Health Organisation, to offer dietary advice on reducing the amount of sweetness in our diets altogether,” said Katherine Appleton, Professor in Psychology at Bournemouth University and corresponding author for the study. “However, our results do not support this advice, which does not consider whether the sweet taste comes from sugar, low calorie sweeteners, or natural sources.” she added. 

During the trial, 180 participants were split into three groups. One group consumed a diet containing a high amount of sweet-tasting food, a second group consumed a low amount and a third consumed an average amount. The sweetness in the foods provided for their diets came from a combination of sugar, natural sweetness or low-calorie sweeteners.

After one, three and six months, participants were surveyed on whether their liking and perception of sweet foods had changed. They were also weighed and provided blood and urine samples to measure any changes in their diabetes risk and cardiovascular health. 

At the end of the trial, the researchers found no significant differences in any of the measures across the three groups. Participants also reported a spontaneous return to their previous intake of sweet foods after the six months.

Based on their results, the study team are recommending that public health organisations may need to change their current advice on reducing sweet foods to tackle overweight and obesity.  

“It’s not about eating less sweet food to reduce obesity levels,” Professor Appleton said. “The health concerns relate to sugar consumption. Some fast-food items may not taste sweet but can contain high levels of sugar. Similarly, many naturally sweet products such as fresh fruit and dairy products can have health benefits. Public advice therefore needs to concentrate on how people can reduce the amount of sugar and energy-dense foods they consume,” she concluded. 

Source: University of Bournemouth

Sugar Intake Decreasing but Still Too High

Further action needed, according to a University of Bonn study on child and adolescent nutrition

Photo by Patrick Fore on Unsplash

University of Bonn researchers have analysed data on sugar intake among children and adolescents in a long-term study, finding that intake has been declining steadily since 2010 – but is still above the level recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO). The results, to be published in the European Journal of Nutrition, are already available online.

“Our study concerns the intake of free sugars,” explains Dr Ines Perrar, who is a research associate at the University of Bonn Institute of Nutritional and Food Science (IEL) and lead author of the study. “There is debate on whether sugar, like salt and fats, is linked to the development of chronic diseases.” The WHO defines “free” sugar as any form of sugar, including honey, syrup and fruit juice concentrates, added by a manufacturer or when preparing food and beverages at home. Free sugar also includes sugar naturally occurring in juices.

For their project, IEL researchers analysed data from the “Dortmund Nutritional and Anthropometric Longitudinally Designed” cohort study (DONALD). The DONALD study has been ongoing since 1985, gathering detailed data on nutrition, metabolism, growth and health of children and adolescents. “Study participants weigh and document everything they eat and drink on three consecutive days every year,” relates Dr Ute Nöthlings, Professor of Nutritional Epidemiology at the IEL. “Referring to our Institute’s in-house nutrient database, we are able to estimate intake of certain nutrients, including free sugars.”

Sugar intake too high among adolescents in particular

The authors evaluated 4218 sets of three-day weighing dietary records by 751 children and adolescents between ages three and 18 in the years 2010–2023. “Our finding is that free sugar intake continues to decline,” Dr Perrar notes, “but average daily intake still exceeds the level recommended by the WHO and the German Nutrition Society (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Ernährung, DGE) of a maximum 10% of total daily energy intake.”

An analysis of DONALD back in 2019 already indicated that free sugar intake has been declining since 2005, then in 2016 a median value of approximately 16% of daily energy intake was determined. That value has subsequently declined further to 11.7%. The researchers surmise this trend may be explained by increased awareness of the health consequences of excessive consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages and certain other sugary foods.

While the decline definitely represents good progress, there are noteworthy age group differences, as Professor Nöthlings points out, who is director of the DONALD study, spokesperson for the Transdisciplinary Research Area (TRA) Sustainable Futures and a member of the Life and Health TRA at the University of Bonn: “During the observation period, we saw a relatively high intake of free sugars around 15 percent of the daily energy intake in some cases, particularly among adolescents aged six to 14. The intake then declines significantly with increasing age.”

Actual sugar intake likely higher

The researchers point out that the actual sugar intake is likely higher than the study data suggests, due in part to potential under-reporting by the study participants self-reporting on what they eat. In addition, the study is not broadly representative of society, as the design of this large study favours participation by families of a rather higher socioeconomic status who are generally more aware regarding nutrition and health issues.

Source: University of Bonn

Each Gram of Sugar Dropped from a Diet Slows Biological Aging

Photo by Sharon Mccutcheon on Unsplash

Researchers at UC San Francisco have found a link between following a diet that is rich in vitamins and minerals, especially one without much added sugar, and having a younger biological age at the cellular level.

They looked at how three different measures of healthy eating affected an “epigenetic clock” – a biochemical test that can approximate both health and lifespan – and found that the better people ate, the younger their cells looked. Even when people ate healthy diets, each gram of added sugar they consumed was associated with an increase in their epigenetic age.

“The diets we examined align with existing recommendations for preventing disease and promoting health, and they highlight the potency of antioxidant and anti-inflammatory nutrients in particular,” said Dorothy Chiu, PhD, a postdoctoral scholar at the UCSF Osher Center for Integrative Health and first author of the study, appearing in JAMA Network Open. “From a lifestyle medicine standpoint, it is empowering to see how heeding these recommendations may promote a younger cellular age relative to chronological age.”

The study is one of the first to show a link between added sugar and epigenetic aging, and the first to examine this link in a heterogenous group of women – both Black and white – in midlife. Most studies on the topic have involved older white participants.

The study helps deepen our understanding of why sugar is so detrimental to health, said study co-senior author Elissa Epel, PhD, a UCSF professor in the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences.

“We knew that high levels of added sugars are linked to worsened metabolic health and early disease, possibly more than any other dietary factor,” Epel said. “Now we know that accelerated epigenetic aging is underlying this relationship, and this is likely one of many ways that excessive sugar intake limits healthy longevity.”

Women in the study reported consuming an average of 61.5 grams of added sugar per day, though the range was large: from 2.7 to 316 grams of added sugar daily. A bar of milk chocolate has about 25 grams of added sugar, while a can of cola has about 39 grams. The US Food and Drug Administration recommends adults consume no more than 50 grams of added sugar per day.

A nutrient-based approach

For the cross-sectional study, researchers analysed food records from 342 Black and white women with a mean age of 39 years from Northern California. Then, they compared their diets with epigenetic clock measures, which were derived from saliva samples.

Researchers scored the women’s diets to see how they compared to a Mediterranean-style diet rich in anti-inflammatory and antioxidant foods and then to a diet linked to lower risk for chronic disease.

Finally, they scored the women’s diets against a measure they created called the “Epigenetic Nutrient Index (ENI),” which is based on nutrients (not foods) that have been linked to anti-oxidative or anti-inflammatory processes and DNA maintenance and repair. These include Vitamins A, C, B12 and E, folate, selenium, magnesium, dietary fibre and isoflavones.

Adherence to any of the diets was significantly associated with lower epigenetic age, with the Mediterranean diet having the strongest association.

The researchers examined sugar intake separately and found that consuming foods with added sugar was associated with accelerated biological aging, even in the presence of an otherwise healthy diet.

“Given that epigenetic patterns appear to be reversible, it may be that eliminating 10 grams of added sugar per day is akin to turning back the biological clock by 2.4 months, if sustained over time,” said co-senior author Barbara Laraia, PhD, RD, a UC Berkeley professor in the Food, Nutrition and Population Health program. “Focusing on foods that are high in key nutrients and low in added sugars may be a new way to help motivate people to eat well for longevity.”

Source: University of California San Francisco

Study Shows a Link Between Sugar-sweetened Beverages and Liver Cancer

Photo by Breakingpic on Pexels

One of the first studies to look at the association between intake of sugar-sweetened beverages, artificially sweetened beverages, and incidence of liver cancer and chronic liver disease mortality, has found an 85% increase in liver cancer incidence between postmenopausal women who consume one sweetened drink per day and those who consume them rarely. Results from the study, which was led by Brigham and Women’s Hospital, are published in JAMA.

“To our knowledge, this is the first study to report an association between sugar sweetened beverage intake and chronic liver disease mortality,” said first author Longgang Zhao, PhD, of the Brigham’s Channing Division of Network Medicine. Zhao is a postdoctoral researcher who works with senior author Xuehong Zhang, MBBS, ScD, in the Channing Division. “Our findings, if confirmed, may pave the way to a public health strategy to reduce risk of liver disease based on data from a large and geographically diverse cohort.”

This observational study included nearly 100 000 postmenopausal women from the large, prospective Women’s Health Initiative study. Participants reported their usual soft drink, fruit drink (not including fruit juice) consumption, and then reported artificially sweetened beverage consumption after three years. Participants were followed for a median of more than 20 years. Researchers looked at self-reported liver cancer incidence and death due to chronic liver disease such as fibrosis, cirrhosis, or chronic hepatitis, which were further verified by medical records or the National Death Index.

A total of 98 786 postmenopausal women were included in the final analyses. The 6.8% of women who consumed one or more sugar-sweetened beverages daily had an 85% higher risk of liver cancer and 68% higher risk of chronic liver disease mortality compared to those who had fewer than three sugar sweetened beverages per month. No such increase was observed for consumption of artificially-sweetened beverages.

The authors note that the study was observational, and causality cannot be inferred, and relied on self-reported responses about intake, sugar content and outcomes. More studies are needed to validate this risk association and determine why the sugary drinks appeared to increase risk of liver cancer and disease. Furthermore, more research is needed to elucidate the potential mechanisms by integrating genetics, preclinical and experimental studies, and -omics data.

Source: Mass General Brigham