Category: Hospitals

Categories : COVID HospitalsTags :

Omicron Not ‘Mild’ for US, Experts Say

On By ModernMedia

In stark contrast to South Africa’s approach to COVID and the country’s experts characterising Omicron as “mild”, US experts have said that calling it “mild” ignores the harsh situation their country faces: record hospitalisations, sick children, other conditions being worsened by COVID, and staff shortages.

While Omicron’s odds of causing a person’s hospitalisation or death are lower, US numbers suggest that Omicron is, in fact, serious on a population level.

“What’s mild about hospitals at or near the breaking point? What’s mild about hundreds of healthcare workers per hospital out ill with COVID? What’s mild about 1.3 million cases in the U.S. just yesterday? What’s mild about the rising titer of burnout? What’s mild about an unprecedented number of children now ill and hospitalised with COVID?” Clyde Yancy, MD, chief of cardiology at Northwestern University’s Feinberg School of Medicine in Chicago, wrote in an email to MedPage Today.

“I think prudence would suggest that we reframe ‘mild’ and think more about ‘self-limited,'” he added. “We are likely at or near a plateau but how long will it last and how much more agony awaits?”

Americans were hospitalised in record numbers last week. “When there are many more people sick in large numbers – in millions – even if it’s a smaller percentage that’s going to be severely sick, that is going to result in large numbers in the hospitals,” said Biykem Bozkurt, MD, PhD, a cardiologist at Baylor College of Medicine in Houston.

While Omicron is still a threat for those unvaccinated or without previous infection, its high breakthrough rate is a cause for concern, especially in vulnerable people.

“Individuals who have breakthroughs after being vaccinated, including the elderly who have comorbid heart disease, are now flooding our emergency departments with decompensated cardiovascular diagnoses and a positive coronavirus test,” said cardiologist Jim Januzzi, MD, of Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School in Boston.

As well as buckling healthcare systems, vulnerable and overlooked populations are being affected by Omicron even more.

Paediatric hospitalisations in the US reached a new peak in mid-January, with 20% of the entire pandemic’s hospitalisations of children happening in just two weeks in January. Over 1000 children have died from COVID by the CDC’s numbers, including 359 under five.

Moreover, patients on immunosuppressive medications may be less protected by the vaccines. “The labelling of the Omicron infection as ‘mild’ overlooks the important features and the messaging to the public,” rheumatologist Vaidehi Chowdhary, MBBS, MD, DM, of Yale School of Medicine in New Haven, Connecticut, wrote in an email to MedPage Today.

“Some patients who are on strong immunosuppressive medications do not have adequate vaccine titers and remain vulnerable,” she said, pointing out that there’s a shortage of monoclonal antibodies and antivirals, which means that this group must take extra precautions to ensure they aren’t infected in the first place.

Omicron’s impact on those who are immunosuppressed or have long COVID is not yet known, Dr Chowdhary noted. “For immunosuppressed patients, to minimise infections, many in-person appointments have been converted to telehealth or elective procedures deferred. The impact of these practices and their impact on overall patient health are not known.”

People living with disabilities and chronic illnesses continue to be faced with worsened infections, delaying consultations and difficulty accessing healthcare.

Then there are those whose infection has exacerbated their condition, whatever it may be. Omicron could be the thing that tips them over the edge, or that keeps them in the hospital for longer, experts have said. Examples seen include patients with blood clots having those clots exacerbated by COVID, and COVID-positive trauma patients having complications and longer recovery times.

Healthcare workers falling ill due to Omicron has seriously stressed US healthcare, with staff shortages have been reported in almost 20% of the country’s hospitals, leaving their already overworked colleagues to work extra.

Dr Januzzi’s hospital has been “completely full, with a huge number of individuals with COVID. So, we’re really at a breaking point where staff are getting sick. Patients and physicians alike are exhausted … the hope would be that we can get through this time and get to the other side of this.”

Source: MedPage Today

Categories : COVID HospitalsTags :

Little COVID Viral Contamination Risk in Hospital Rooms

On By ModernMedia
Source: Martha Dominguez de Gouveia on Unsplash

A study found that hospital rooms where COVID patients were treated had little to no active virus contaminations on surfaces. The finding, published in Clinical Infectious Diseases, concluded that contaminated surfaces in the hospital environment are unlikely to be a source of indirect transmission of the virus, contrary to earlier views.

“Early on in the pandemic, there were studies that found that SARS-CoV-2 could be detected on surfaces for many days,” said the study’s senior author, Professor Deverick Anderson. “But this doesn’t mean the virus is viable. We found there is almost no live, infectious virus on the surfaces we tested.”

The researchers tested a variety of surfaces in the hospital rooms of 20 COVID patients at Duke University Hospital over several days of hospitalisation, including on days 1, 3, 6, 10 and 14.

Samples were collected from the patients’ bedrail, sink, medical prep area, room computer and exit door handle. A final sample was collected at the nursing station computer outside the patient room.

PCR testing found that 19 of 347 samples gathered were positive for the virus, including nine from bedrails, four from sinks, four from room computers, one from the medical prep area and one from the exit door handle. All nursing station computer samples were negative.

Of the 19 positive samples, most (16) were from the first or third day of hospitalisation.

All 19 positive samples were screened for infectious virus via cell culture with only one sample, obtained on day three from the bedrails of a symptomatic patient with diarrhoea and a fever, demonstrating the potential to be infectious.

“While hospital rooms are routinely cleaned, we know that there is no such thing as a sterile environment,” Prof Anderson said. “The question is whether small amounts of viral particles detected on surfaces are capable of causing infections. Our study shows that this is not a high-risk mode of transmission.”

Prof Anderson said the findings reinforce the understanding that SARS-CoV-2 primarily spreads through person-to-person encounters via respiratory droplets in the air. He noted that people should concentrate on known anti-infection strategies such as masking and socially distancing to mitigate exposures to airborne particles.

Source: Duke University

Categories : HospitalsTags :

Standard Saline as Effective as Specialised Intravenous Fluids in ICU

On By ModernMedia
Photo by Anna Shvets on Pexels

New research on intravenous fluids used in intensive care shows that commonly used saline is as effective at keeping people alive and their organs functioning as more expensive balanced solutions.

The results not only provide doctors with greater certainty about the safety and benefits of saline solution, but also have broader implications for treatment availability and costs around the world.

“Just about every patient admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) will receive intravenous fluids for resuscitation or as part of standard treatment,” said Professor Simon Finfer AO, an ICU physician and senior researcher at The George Institute.

“However, the best choice of fluid has been a longstanding issue of debate as some fluids were approved and licensed for use based on trials in small numbers of patients looking only at short term outcomes.”

Plasma-Lyte 148® is a type of intravenous fluid that more closely matches the body’s normal levels of certain minerals, known as balanced multi-electrolyte solutions, or BMES. Use of BMES has risen since concerns were raised about increased rates of kidney injury and death associated with saline, although this had not been proven in clinical trials.

To address this issue, the Plasma-Lyte 148® versUs Saline (PLUS) study recruited over 5000 patients across 53 sites in Australia and New Zealand.

Participants were adult patients admitted to ICUs in need of intravenous fluid resuscitation for their underlying medical condition. The patients were followed for a period of 90 days after treatment as previous research had shown around one in four would be at risk of dying within this timeframe.

At 90 days after the treatment, the same number of patients who had received BMES or saline had died.

Other outcomes including days of mechanical ventilation, kidney dialysis, patient survival time in the ICU and in hospital, as well as major measures of healthcare costs were similar between the groups.

“We found no evidence that using a balanced multi-electrolyte solution in the ICU, compared to saline, reduced risk of death or acute kidney injury in critically ill adults,” said Prof Finfer.

ICU is one of the most expensive aspects of healthcare and ICU resources are in high demand. Even a small difference in outcomes may result in important clinical and economic effects at the population level.

In the early 1990s, up to one in seven people were dying in ICUs across Australia and New Zealand, prompting George Institute researchers to start investigating intravenous fluid resuscitation – one of the most commonly used treatments in intensive care settings.

This started a program of fluid resuscitation research conducted in ICUs that no-one previously thought possible which has resulted in major changes to clinical treatment guidelines worldwide, preventing harmful practices and saving many lives.

The results from this study were published in the New England Journal of Medicine.

Source: EurekAlert!

Categories : Hospitals PaediatricsTags :

One-sixth of Patients in PICUs Harmed by Medications

On By ModernMedia

One-sixth of children in paediatric intensive care units (PICUs) were harmed by medications, of which most cases were preventable, according to a new study published in the British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology.

Researchers conducted an observational study across three PICUs in England over a three-month period in 2019.

The study included 302 patients and 62 adverse drug events were confirmed. The estimated incidence of adverse drug events were 20.5 per 100 patients, and most were preventable as judged by the expert panel. ADEs were commonly involved with medicines prescribing (46.8%) and caused temporary patient harm (67.7%). 

Medications for the central nervous system (22.6%), infections (20.9%), and the cardiovascular system (19.4%) were commonly implicated with adverse drug events. Analysis revealed that patients who stayed in PICU for seven or more days were more likely to experience an adverse event compared to patients with a shorter stay. 

“This multicentre study is the first of its kind in the UK hospitals, and its findings can guide future remedial interventions to reduce avoidable medication-related harm in this vulnerable patient population,” said lead author Anwar A. Alghamdi, PhD, of the University of Manchester.

Source: Wiley

Categories : COVID HospitalsTags : 1 Comment

Netcare Reports Less Severe COVID in Fourth Wave

On By ModernMedia
Image by Quicknews

In a news release by Netcare, the company’s CEO Dr Richard Friedland said that more than three weeks after the discovery of the new Omicron variant in South Africa, data across its hospitals and primary healthcare facilities are demonstrating important early trends.

“Having personally seen many of our patients across our Gauteng hospitals, their symptoms are far milder than anything we experienced during the first three waves,” commented Dr Friedland.

“Approximately 90% of COVID patients currently in our hospitals require no form of oxygen therapy and are considered incidental cases. While we fully recognise that it is still early days, if this trend continues, it would appear that with a few exceptions of those requiring tertiary care, the fourth wave can be adequately treated at a primary care level.”

Rates of community transmission and hospital admission possibly decoupled
During the first three waves, the rate of hospital admissions rose in tandem with the rate of community transmission (the number of people testing positive). Dr Friedland noted that, in the first three waves of the pandemic, Netcare treated 126 000 COVID patients across its 49 acute hospitals, of which 55 000 (44%) patients required admission and 26% of these patients were treated in High Care and Intensive Care (ICU). Significantly, all COVID patients admitted were sick and required some form of oxygen therapy. The high admission rate, as well as the high percentage of patients requiring ICU or High Care indicates the severity of cases during the first three waves.

“As of today we have 337 COVID positive patients admitted (72% in the Gauteng area and 18% in KwaZulu-Natal). Of these patients approximately 10% (33 patients) are on some form of oxygenation versus 100% in the first three waves. Eight of these patients (2%) are being ventilated and of these, two are primary trauma cases that are also COVID positive.”

Netcare’s policy is to test all patients for COVID before or on admission. Patients admitted for other primary diagnoses or surgical procedures who test positive for COVID] but do not require any form of oxygenation are considered to be incidental COVID cases, which currently accounts for 90% of COVID cases now in Netcare hospitals.

“During the first three waves, when the overall community positivity rate breached 26% across South Africa, we were inundated with COVID admissions to hospital. Within Netcare we had over 2000 COVID patients in hospitals during the first wave, over 2 250 patients in hospital during the second wave and over 3000 patients in hospital during the third wave. At present the 337 patients represent a fraction compared to previous waves,” said Dr Friedland.

“The very rapid rise in community transmission as compared to previous waves may partially explain this relatively low hospital admission rate. However, there does appear to be a decoupling in terms of the rate of hospital admissions at this early stage in the evolution of the fourth wave,” suggested Dr Friedland.

Majority of patients unvaccinated
Dr Friedland added that of a total of 800 COVID positive patients that were admitted since 15 November, 75% of patients were unvaccinated. Netcare has seen seven deaths over this period in this group of patients, of which four may be ascribed to COVID. These four patients were 58 to 91 years of age and had significant co-morbidities. Of these patients, three were not vaccinated.

Dr Friedland observed that COVID patients admitted since 15 November are on average younger than those seen during the first three waves. Over 71% are under 50, with an average age of 38.5. This compares to only 40% below 50 in the first three waves, with an average age of 54.

Virtually all patients have presented with mild to moderate flu-like symptoms, including a blocked or runny nose, headache and a scratchy or sore throat and have been treated symptomatically.

Dr Friedland reiterated that the best way to support South Africa remains to take COVID extremely seriously and to be as cautious as ever.

Categories : COVID HospitalsTags :

How One Hospital Met the COVID Surge Head-on

On By ModernMedia
Photo by Artem Podrez on Unsplash

Since March of 2020, the COVID pandemic has put an unprecedented strain on hospitals as large surges of intensive care unit patients overwhelmed hospitals. To meet this challenge, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (BIDMC) expanded ICU capacity by 93% and maintained surge conditions during the nine weeks in the first quarter of 2020.

In a pair of papers and a guest editorial published in Dimensions of Critical Care Nursing, a team of nurse-scientists at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (BIDMC) report on almost doubling the hospital’s ICU capacity; identifying, training and redeploying staff; and developing and implementing a proning team to manage patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome during the first COVID surge.

“As COVID was sweeping through the nation, we at BIDMC were preparing for the projected influx of highly infectious, critically ill patients,” said lead author Sharon C. O’Donoghue, DNP, RN, a nurse specialist in the medical intensive care units at BIDMC. “It rapidly became apparent that a plan for the arrival of highly infectious critically ill patients as well as a strategy for adequate staffing protecting employees and assuring the public that this could be managed successfully were needed.”

After setting up a hospital incident command structure to clearly define roles, open up lines of communication and develop surge plans, BIDMC’s leadership began planning for the impending influx of COVID patients in February 2020.

BIDMC – a 673 licensed bed teaching hospital affiliated with Harvard Medical School – has nine specialty ICUs located on two campuses for a total of 77 ICU beds. Informed by an epidemic surge drill conducted at BIDMC in 2012, it was determined that the trigger to open extra ICU space would be when 70 ICU beds were occupied. When this milestone was met on March 31, 2020, departmental personnel had a 12-hour window to convert two 36-bed medical-surgical units into additional ICU space, providing an additional 72 beds.

“Because the medical-surgical environment is not designed to deliver an ICU level of care, many modifications needed to be made and the need for distancing only added to the difficulties,” said senior author Susan DeSanto-Madeya, PhD, RN, FAAN, a Beth Israel Hospital Nurses Alumna Association endowed nurse scientist. “Many of these rooms were originally designed for patient privacy and quiet, but a key safety element in critical care is patient visibility, so we modified the spaces to accommodate ICU workflow.”

Modifications included putting windows in all patient room doors, and repositioning beds and monitors so patients and screens could be easily seen without entering the room. Lines of visibility were augmented with mirrors and baby monitor systems as necessary. Care providers were given two-way radios to decrease the number of staff required to enter a room when hands-on patient care was necessary. Mobile supply carts and workstations helped streamline workflow efficiency.

Besides stockpiling and managing medical equipment including PPE, ventilators and oxygen, increasing ICU capacity also required redeploying 150 staff trained in critical care. The hospital developed a recall list for former ICU nurses, as well as medical-surgical nurses that could care for critically ill patients on teams with veteran ICU nurses.

Education and support was provided from . In-person, socially-distanced workshops were developed for each group, after which nurses were assigned to shadow an ICU nurse to reduce anxiety, practice new skills and gain confidence.

“Staff identified the shadow experience as being most beneficial in preparing them for deployment during the COVID surge,” said O’Donoghue. “Historically, BIDMC has had strong collaborative relationships with staff from different areas and these relationships proved to be vital to the success of all the care teams. The social work department played a major role in fostering teams, especially during difficult situations.”

One of the redeployment teams was the ICU proning team. Proning is known to improve oxygenation in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome is a complex intervention, takes time and is not without its potential dangers to the patient and staff alike. The coalition maximised resources and facilitated more than 160 interventions between March and May of 2020.

“Although the pandemic was an unprecedented occurrence, it has prepared us for potential future crises requiring the collaboration of multidisciplinary teams to ensure optimal outcomes in an overextended environment,” O’Donoghue said. “BIDMC’s staff rose to the challenge, and many positive lessons were learned from this difficult experience.”

“We must continue to be vigilant in our assessment of what worked and what did not work and look for ways to improve health care delivery in all our systems,” said DeSanto-Madeya, who is also an associate professor at the College of Nursing at the University of Rhode Island. “The memories from this past year and a half cannot be forgotten, and we can move forward confidently knowing we provided the best care possible despite all the hardships.”

Source: Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

Categories : Ethics and Law HospitalsTags :

Violence in the ED: A Critical Issue in Healthcare

On By ModernMedia
Phot by Mulyadi on Unsplash

A study by the Mayo Clinic found that most healthcare workers experience violence in emergency departments (EDs), but they seldomly report it to anyone.

Over six months prior to being surveyed, 72% of healthcare workers and other ED staff said they had personally experienced violence (71% verbal abuse and 31% physical assault), Sarayna McGuire, MD, chief resident of Mayo Emergency Medicine in Rochester, Minnesota, reported in a series of three studies at the American College of Emergency Physicians annual meeting.

Nurses and clinicians, along with security personnel, bore the brunt of the attacks: 94% of nurses and 90% of clinicians reported experiencing verbal abuse, and 54% of nurses and 36% of clinicians reported instances of physical assault.

“The whole team is impacted by workplace violence,” Dr McGuire said to MedPage Today. “Even people coming in to draw blood are being assaulted physically and verbally abused.”

Despite this prevalent violence and 58% reporting at least moderate awareness of reporting policies, 77% of all respondents said they never or rarely report violence, while only 10% said they often or always do.

A possible explanation could be that only 7% of non-security staff said they were “extremely familiar” with the procedures. And when participants were asked why ED abuse is not usually reported, the top four reasons given were:

  • No physical injury was sustained (53% of respondents)
  • “It comes with the job” (47%)
  • Staff are too busy (47%)
  • Reporting is inconvenient (41%)

The violence is not without consequences; 18% of respondents said they are considering leaving their position due to the violence, and 48% said violence has changed the way they view or interact with patients.

Men and more experienced staff reported feeling significantly better prepared compared with women. When asked which factors staff thought were most responsible for the violence, the following feature in at least 70% of responses: alcohol, illicit drugs, and significant mental illness.

A total of 86% of respondents said they felt at least moderately prepared to handle verbal abuse, while 68% said they felt prepared to handle physical assault.

“Everyone’s feeling right now that violence has increased in healthcare [during the pandemic], and our data have showed that,” Dr McGuire said. “How is this sustainable? …There is a critical issue in healthcare.”

She added that since reporting of violence is so low, true exposure to violence is probably much higher than the study found.

Study co-author Casey M. Clements, MD, PhD, also of Mayo Emergency Medicine, added that “we know this isn’t isolated to emergency departments.”

He explained that while the study encompassed the pandemic era, violence “has been a problem for some time in healthcare” – violence is a major threat to the healthcare workforce, Dr Clements said. He added that another problem is that physicians typically do not receive any training in de-escalation — “we learn this on the job.”

For the study, the researchers sent an anonymous survey to ED staff at 20 EDs. Also included were social workers, management, and security staff. Women made up 73% of the 833 respondents. Nursing staff (31%) made up the largest medical discipline, and 16% were clinicians.

Dr McGuire suggested that a centralised reporting system would help augment reporting of violence.

“We need to change the mindset that it’s anybody’s job to be assaulted at work,” Dr Clements said. “We cannot go on having our emergency department workers being abused and assaulted on a daily basis.”

Source: MedPage Today

Categories : HospitalsTags :

Wits Opens Advanced Surgical Skills Lab

On By ModernMedia
Photo by Clodagh da Paixao on Unsplash

To help address the critical shortage of expert medical specialists in the country, including surgeons, Wits University opened the Wits Advanced Surgical Skills Lab. It has been estimated that the country needs double the number of surgeons to meet its needs, a situation worsened by losing many surgical experts to the competitive overseas market due to the lack of sufficient highly specialised facilities, infrastructure, and advanced academic training programmes.

“Wits trains more doctors, surgeons, specialists and sub-specialists than any other university in southern Africa. The new R22-million Wits Advanced Surgical Skills Lab will help to enhance the training of surgeons, across disciplines, in a state-of-the-art environment, with the best equipment available,” said Professor Damon Bizos, Head of Wits Surgical Gastroenterology, and the Clinical Head of Surgery at the Wits Donald Gordon Medical Centre. “We need to replenish these specialised skills and replicate them in adequate measure in order to deliver essential services to South Africans and Africans.”

Located on the ninth floor of the Faculty of Health Sciences building in Parktown, the Wits Advanced Surgical Skills Lab officially opened on Tuesday, 12 October 2021. The state-of-the-art facility is designed in line with international best standards. along with teaching facilities that make the Wits surgical training programme one of the best in the world.

“If we fail to replenish the pool of surgeons in South Africa, both the training of all South African doctors and the delivery of healthcare for all will be compromised. The loss of these skills will result in the loss of services in both the private and public sectors,” said Professor Zeblon Vilakazi, Wits Vice-Chancellor and Principal. “South Africa needs to retain highly skilled and specialised surgeons. By creating opportunities for doctors to undergo highly specialised training locally, rather than abroad, the likelihood of losing these doctors to other countries is lessened.”

The Wits Advanced Surgical Skills Lab will be able to provide the interdisciplinary training needs of surgical disciplines including general surgery; orthopaedics; gynaecology; ear, nose and throat; cardiothoracic; urology; maxillofacial; ophthalmologic; neuro; and plastic surgery. It will also include the training of specialists, doctors, nurses and other allied health practitioners.

“The basic and intermediate courses will help inculcate basic surgical competence and skills development, whilst advanced courses will ensure that experienced practitioners remain at the forefront of advances in the field,” added Prof Bizos. “We will offer access to in-house training as well as industry-sponsored surgical training courses and symposia. Train-the-trainer programmes and research into skills training will also be integral.”

The Wits Advanced Surgical Skills Laboratory boasts a large ‘wet lab’ with eight stations; laparoscopic towers and endoscopy (upper endoscopy and colonoscopy); has facilities available for training on cadavers; lead-lined walls to accommodate imaging; a new lecture room for 35 participants; and full audiovisual and videoconferencing facilities.

“Access to safe, high-quality surgery care remains an ongoing challenge in South Africa and beyond. There is a well-defined unmet need, and the training of surgeons and surgical care providers is an essential component of the strategy to improve surgical care and address the unmet need. Modern day approaches to training require that we must address both the technical competency and non-technical skills of the surgeon. This must be achieved in a standardised and measurable way. To do so has meant that we, as the trainers of the next generation of practitioners, must embrace new technologies and training opportunities,” said Professor Martin Smith, the Head of the Department of Surgery in the Faculty of Health Sciences at Wits University. “We are very grateful that through the support of the University and the contributions of a number of donors we have been able to establish a facility to enhance and improve this training.”

Source: Wits University

Categories : HospitalsTags :

Equivalent Hip Surgery Outcomes for Spinal vs General Anaesthesia

On By ModernMedia
Photo by Piron Guillaume on Unsplash

Research comparing general versus spinal anaesthesia for hip fracture surgery shows similar outcomes for patients, challenging the common thinking that patients receiving spinal anaesthesia fare better. 

Led by researchers from the Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, the study was published in the New England Journal of Medicine and presented at Anesthesiology 2021, the annual meeting of the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA).

“Available evidence has not definitively addressed the question of whether spinal anaesthesia is safer than general anaesthesia for hip fracture surgery, an important question to clinicians, patients, and families. Our study argues that, in many cases, either form of anaesthesia appears to be safe,” said lead investigator Mark D. Neuman, MD, MSc, an associate professor of Anesthesiology and Critical Care. “This is important because it suggests that choices can be guided by patient preference rather than anticipated differences in outcomes in many cases.”

While most of the 250 000 annual hip fracture patients in the US undergo general anaesthesia, spinal anaesthesia increased by 50% between 2007 and 2017, while in the United Kingdom and other countries, spinal anaesthesia is used in over 50% of hip fracture cases. [PDF]

Most recent comparisons of general anaesthesia versus spinal anaesthesia come from non-randomised studies, some indicating fewer cognitive and medical complications with spinal. Some patients may choose spinal anaesthesia for lower complications, while those choosing general may have a fear of spinal injection or insufficient anaesthesia. 

The study enrolled 1600 patients, all at least 50 years old, who had broken a hip. Among older populations, hip fractures are particularly worrisome as they can lead to a loss of mobility, linked to a doubling or even tripling the risk of near-term death. The patients were randomised into two groups, a major advantage for the study.

The researchers combined subsequent patient death rates and whether they regained the ability to walk, even with a walker. By 60 days post-surgery, 18.5% of patients assigned to spinal anaesthesia had either died or become newly unable to walk versus 18% of patients who received general anaesthesia. Mortality at this point was 3.9% of patients who received spinal anaesthesia died versus 4.1% who got general anaesthesia.

Additionally, to examine how the different forms of anaesthesia factored into potential cognitive complications, the researchers also examined post-operative delirium. Delirium was experienced in 21% of spinal anaesthesia patients versus 20% for general anaesthesia.

“What our study offers is reassurance that general anaesthesia can represent a safe option for hip fracture surgery for many patients,” said Prof Neuman. “This is information that patients, families, and clinicians can use together to make the right choice for each patient’s personalised care.”

Source: Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania 

Categories : HospitalsTags :

Physician Anaesthesiologist-led Teams Reduce Cardiac Arrests and Deaths

On By ModernMedia
Source: Vidal Balielo Jr on Pexels

Rapid response teams led by physician anaesthesiologists resulted in a significant decrease in cardiac arrest and death, after a transition from nurse-only rapid response teams, according to a study presented at the ANESTHESIOLOGY® 2021 annual meeting.

“As anaesthesiologists, we care for the entire spectrum of a patient’s life from in utero to end of life,” said lead author Faith Factora, MD, medical director, Surgical Intensive Care Unit, Cleveland Clinic. “Our training gives us experience performing practical skills like resuscitation and CPR, in addition to more subtle skills like implementing quality improvement projects and developing safety processes for patient care. Our specialty affects entire patient populations of hospital care and this study represents an example of the care we provide across the spectrum of our patients’ lives and our health care institutions.”

Analysing 458 233 patient hospitalisations, the study found 103 103 patients who were cared for by the original nurse-led rapid response team and 355 130 patients were cared for by the physician anaesthesiologist-led rapid response team. Patients of the physician-led team had a 50% less chance of experiencing cardiac arrest and a 27% less chance of death, compared to the original nurse-led rapid response team.

Rapid response teams address early clinical deterioration, initiating critical care interventions before an emergency or intubation occurs outside of the intensive care unit. By implementing a hospital-wide system led by anaesthesiologists, using principles of monitoring and patient safety that guide the specialty, the physician-led team showed a decrease in cardiac arrests and deaths. The system included early warning systems, including regular monitoring of patients’ conditions and vital sign checks on a regular basis that triggered alerts if critical criteria were met. Examples of conditions that triggered alerts were low blood pressure or high heart rates.

Physician anaesthesiologists are champions of patient safety, uniquely educated and trained for critical moments in health care, with an ability to navigate life-and-death moments in patient care unmatched by other professions. Their education and training is extensive, with up to 14 years of education, including medical school, and 12 000 to 16 000 hours of clinical training.

Source: American Society of Anesthesiologists