Tag: statins

New Research Points to Clot Lysis Protein for Cholesterol Control

Source: Wikimedia CC0

While high levels of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) can be reduced by drugs such as statins, reducing the risk of myocardial infarction and stroke, risk still remains in the form of other cholesterols. New research published in the journal Science describes how manipulating a protein involved in blood clot lysis could help bring cholesterol levels even more under control.

Heart disease remains a leading cause of death worldwide, despite advances in cholesterol-lowering medication such as proprotein convertase subtilisin-kexin type 9 inhibitors, which were approved by the FDA in 2015. One clinical trial following patients taking proprotein convertase subtilisin-kexin type 9 inhibitors demonstrated a benefit while also revealing an opportunity for improvement as the absolute risk reduction was considered modest at 1.5%.

“It is clear that there is more going on than just what statins and these newer inhibitor drugs can control,” says Ze Zheng, MBBS, PhD, MCW assistant professor of medicine. “More therapies are needed, and to get them we need to know more about other sources of risk for heart disease, especially heart attacks and strokes.”

So-called “bad cholesterol” is carried by apolipoprotein B (apoB) which forms well-structured particles with lipids and proteins. These particles serve as stable vehicles for transporting lipids such as cholesterol in the bloodstream. These lipid-rich particles mostly include very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL). Current cholesterol-lowering reduce mainly LDL levels, which though important to control, is not the only risk factor for heart disease. In fact, the other lipoproteins in the same group as LDL are not reduced by much with available treatments. Dr Zheng and her team are investigating how to reduce levels of other members of this family of lipoproteins, especially VLDL.

“With my background in lipid metabolism, I found myself consistently checking lipid levels even during studies regarding blood clot lysis and how an impairment in the body’s ability to remove blood clots affects the risk of blood vessel blockages,” Dr Zheng adds. “I was just naturally curious about it, and I noticed that a protein I was studying may have an effect on the amount of circulating cholesterol.”

In prior research, Dr Zheng has helped define a new cellular source of this protein, tissue-type plasminogen activator (tPA), and its role in breaking down blood clots and preventing blood vessel blockages. To understand its potential influence on cholesterol levels, her team used a gene-editing technique to stop liver cells from producing tPA in mice prone to blood vessel plaque formation. The scientists found that the mice developed increased lipoprotein-cholesterol in this experiment, and then validated the findings in follow-up studies using human liver cells and a type of rat liver cell known to produce VLDL in a way similar to human liver cells. With these and other experimental results, Dr Zheng and her team have demonstrated a new, important role that liver tPA influences blood cholesterol levels while underscoring a meaningful connection between the liver, heart and blood vessels.

“After defining this new role for tPA, we turned our attention to the question of how it changes blood cholesterol levels,” notes Wen Dai, MD, research scientist, Versiti Blood Research Institute.

The liver contributes to the majority of the “bad” apoB-lipoproteins by making VLDL. The team focused on whether and how tPA impacts the process of VLDL assembly in the liver. Microsomal triglyceride transfer protein (MTP) is required for the assembly of VLDL due to its role carrying lipids to the apoB. The scientists determined that tPA binds with the apoB protein in the same place as MTP. The more tPA is present, the fewer opportunities MTP has to connect with apoB and catalyse the creation of new VLDL. Essentially, MTP tries to pass a cholesterol to apoB, but tPA interferes with this pocess.

“Based on our prior research, we knew it also was critical to look at tPA’s primary inhibitor,” Dr. Zheng says.

Plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) is known to block the activity of tPA. Scientists also have found a correlation between PAI-1 levels in blood and the development of disease due to plaque formation and blockages in blood vessels. The team found that higher levels of PAI-1 reduced the ability of tPA to bind with apoB proteins, rendering tPA less effective at competing with MTP to prevent VLDL production. Returning to the biological gridiron, PAI-1 might be a decoy receiver that distracts tPA until MTP connects with apoB for a big gain. The team studied this interaction in human subjects with a naturally occurring mutation in the gene carrying the code for PAI-1. The researchers found that these individuals, as predicted, had higher tPA levels and lower LDL and VLDL levels than individuals from the same community who did not have the same mutation.

“We are investigating therapeutic strategies based on these findings regarding tPA, MTP and PAI-1,” Dr Zheng notes. “I think we may be able to reduce the residual cardiovascular risk that has persisted even as treatment has advanced.”

Source: Medical College of Wisconsin

Statins Might Reduce the Risk of Colorectal Cancer in Those with Ulcerative Colitis

Photo by Towfiqu Barbhuiya on Unsplash

New research published in eClinicalMedicine suggests that statins might protect patients with ulcerative colitis from developing and dying from colorectal cancer. The study, by Karolinska Insitut researchers, also found that statin treatment was associated with a lower risk of death regardless of cause in patients with ulcerative colitis or Crohn’s disease.

First author Jiangwei Sun notes that previous studies have shown that the risk of colorectal cancer in patients with IBD, such as ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease, is 50% higher than in the general population. This is likely to be because of the chronic gut inflammation that these patients have. Researchers have long sought drugs that can reduce the inflammation-related cancer risk.

“Even though more studies are needed to confirm our results, our study suggests that statins can prevent colorectal cancer in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), which is a high-risk group for this kind of cancer,” says Dr Sun.

The observational study conducted by Dr Sun and his colleagues compared over 10 500 IBD patients from around the country, of whom half were statin users; the other half of the group, who were matched with the first, were not. After a follow-up period of, on average, 5.6 years, 70 of the statin group and 90 of the non-statin group had been diagnosed with colorectal cancer.

The effect increased over time

The protective effect was directly proportional to the length of time the patient had been on statins and could be demonstrated after two years’ treatment.

There were also fewer deaths from colorectal cancer in the statin group (20) than in the non-statin group (37) during the study period, and deaths regardless of cause (529 versus 719).

The study shows that some 200 IBD patients need to be treated with statins to avoid one case of colorectal cancer or death from the cancer within ten years of treatment onset. The protective effect was only statistically valid for patients with ulcerative colitis.

“We think this is because the study contained fewer patients with Crohn’s disease,” explains Dr Sun. “More and larger studies compiling data from patient populations in many countries will probably be needed to achieve statistical significance for Crohn’s disease.”

Significantly fewer deaths

To avoid death regardless of cause during the same ten-year period, the number of treated patients dropped to 20, on account of how statins also protect against more common conditions, such as cardiovascular disease. Statins were linked to fewer deaths in both ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease patients.

The study was based on the ESPRESSO-cohort, which is run by its initiative-taker Jonas F Ludvigsson, paediatrician at Örebro University Hospital and professor at Karolinska Institutet, and the study’s last author.

“In that we can combine tissue data from patients with colorectal cancer with data from Swedish health registries, we’re uniquely placed to study the long-term effects of drugs for IBD,” he says. “Our hope is that these studies will improve the care of IBD patients.”

The most solid evidence so far

According to the researchers, the new results provide the most solid evidence so far that statins could be an effective prophylactic for colorectal cancer among people with IBD. However, more knowledge must be gathered before the treatment can be recommended in general guidelines.

“More studies are needed to ascertain if there is a causal relationship, at what point of the pathological process statins should be administered, what a reasonable dose would be and how long treatment needs to last if it’s to be of benefit,” says Dr Sun.

Source: Karolinska Institut


Can Taking Statins after an Intracerebral Haemorrhage Reduce the Risk of Another Stroke?

Source: CC0

Patients who have had an intracerebral haemorrhage who take cholesterol-lowering drugs called statins may have a lower risk of having another stroke, especially ischaemic stroke, compared to people who also had an intracerebral haemorrhage but were not taking statins, according to a new study published in Neurology, the medical journal of the American Academy of Neurology.

“Previous research has had mixed results on the risk of stroke in people who are taking statins and have already had a bleeding stroke, so we evaluated this further,” said study author David Gaist, MD, PhD, of the University of Southern Denmark in Odense and a member of the American Academy of Neurology. “We looked at whether use of statins after a bleeding stroke is associated with the risk of any additional stroke, including both those caused by bleeding and by blood clots. We found that those who used statins had a lower risk of stroke, notably ischaemic stroke, while there was no change in the risk of bleeding stroke.”

For the study, researchers looked at health records in Denmark and identified 15 151 people who had a first bleeding stroke.

People were followed from 30 days after their first bleeding stroke until the first occurrence of another stroke, death, or the end of follow-up, which on average lasted 3.3 years. Researchers used prescription data to determine information on statin use.

Researchers then compared 1959 people who had another stroke to 7400 people who did not have another stroke who were similar in age, sex and other factors. Of those who had another stroke, 757 people, or 39%, took statins compared to 3044 people, or 41%, of those who did not have a second stroke.

After adjusting for factors like hypertension, diabetes and alcohol use, statin use was associated with a 12% lower risk of another stroke.

Then they compared 1073 people who had an ischaemic stroke to 4,035 people who did not have another stroke. Of those who had an ischaemic stroke, 427 people, or 40%, took statins compared to 1687 people, or 42%, of those who did not have another stroke.

After adjusting for similar factors, statin use was associated with a 21% lower risk of an ischaemic stroke after the initial bleeding stroke.

They also compared 984 people who had another bleeding stroke to 3755 people who did not have another stroke. Of those who had a recurrent bleeding stroke, 385 people, or 39%, took statins compared to 1532 people, or 41%, of those who did not have another stroke.

After adjustments, researchers did not find a link between statin use and recurrent bleeding stroke.

“The results of our study are good news for people taking statins who have had a bleeding stroke,” Gaist added. “While we did find a lower risk of having another stroke, it is important to note that when looking at the data more closely, that lower risk was for ischaemic stroke. Still, we found no increased risk for bleeding stroke. More studies are needed to confirm our findings.”

A limitation of the study was that it only included the Danish population, which is primarily people of European ancestry, and may not be generalisable to people from other populations.

Source: American Academy of Neurology

Daily Statin Reduces Risk of Major Cardiovascular Events in People Living with HIV

Photo by Towfiqu Barbhuiya on Unsplash

A new study published in the New England Journal of Medicine found that statins, a class of cholesterol-lowering medications, may offset the high risk of cardiovascular disease in people living with HIV by more than a third, potentially preventing one in five major cardiovascular events or premature deaths in this population. People living with HIV can have a 50–100% increased risk for cardiovascular disease.

“This research suggests that statins may provide an accessible, cost-effective measure to improve the cardiovascular health and quality of life for people living with HIV,” said Gary H. Gibbons, MD, director of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), a study funder. “Additional research can further expand on this effect, while providing a roadmap to rapidly translate research findings into clinical practice.”

For the double-blinded phase 3 trial, known as Randomised Trial to Prevent Vascular Events in HIV (REPRIEVE) study, researchers randomised participants into either a treatment group, where they received pitavastatin calcium daily or a control group receiving placebo. The researchers followed participants for about five years, but ended the trial early when they discovered the treatment benefits outweighed potential risks.

To understand the benefits, the researchers compared how often participants in each group experienced major cardiovascular events, including heart attacksstrokes, or surgery to open a blocked artery. They found participants who took daily pitavastatin had 35% fewer major cardiovascular events than those who took a placebo. The researchers also measured the number of deaths in combination with major cardiovascular events during the study period and found participants in the treatment group were 21% less likely than those in the placebo group to experience these events. Additionally, those taking pitavastatin had a 30% reduction in their low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels.

“Lowering LDL cholesterol levels reduces risks for cardiovascular events, like having a heart attack and stroke, but these findings suggest there may be additional effects of statin therapy that explain these reduced risks among people living with HIV,” said Steven K. Grinspoon, MD, the study chair. “Ongoing research about how statin therapy may affect inflammation and increased immune activation among people with HIV may help us better understand the additional benefits we’re seeing with this treatment approach.” 

To support optimal health outcomes among the study participants, normal liver and kidney function were an enrolment criteria. They were also required to take antiretroviral therapy, which itself is critical to reducing the risk of HIV complications and related comorbidities, including cardiovascular disease.

Beginning in 2015, REPRIEVE enrolled 7769 adults, ages 40–75, from 145 sites in 12 countries. Adults in the study were an average age of 50 and had low-to-moderate risks for cardiovascular disease, which meant they normally would not have been prescribed statins. Women accounted for 31% of participants. Approximately 41% of study participants identified as Black, 35% as white, 15% as Asian, and 9% as another race.

Source: National Insitutes of Health

Unravelling the Mystery of How Statins Protect Blood Vessels

Source: CC0

Using new genetic tools to study statins in human cells and mice, researchers have uncovered how these drugs protect the cells that line blood vessels. Published in Nature Cardiovascular Research, the findings provide new insight into statins’ curiously wide-ranging benefits, for conditions ranging from arteriosclerosis to diabetes, that have long been observed in the clinic.

“The study gives us an understanding, at a very deep mechanistic level, of why statins have such a positive effect outside of reducing LDL [low-density lipoprotein],” said professor of medicine Joseph Wu, MD, PhD, the study’s senior author. “Given how many people take statins, I think the implications are pretty profound.”

Developed in the 1980s from compounds found in mould and fungi, statins target an enzyme that regulates cholesterol production in the liver. But clinical trials have shown that they also seem to safeguard against cardiovascular disease beyond their ability to lower cholesterol.

Heart failure patients who take statins, for example, are less likely to suffer a second heart attack. They have also been shown to prevent the clogging of arteries, reduce inflammation and even lower cancer risk. Yet these underlying mechanisms are poorly understood.

“Statins were invented to lower cholesterol by targeting the liver. But we didn’t know the targets or the pathways in the cardiovascular system,” said Chun Liu, PhD, an instructor at the Stanford Cardiovascular Institute and co-lead author.

Mesenchymal cells are poor substitutes

To take a closer look at statins’ effect on blood vessels, Liu and colleagues tested a common statin, simvastatin, on lab-grown human endothelial cells derived from induced pluripotent stem cells. Endothelial cells make up the lining of blood vessels, but in many diseases they transform into a different cell type, known as mesenchymal cells, which are poor substitutes.

“Mesenchymal cells are less functional and make tissues stiffer so they cannot relax or contract correctly,” Liu said.

The researchers suspected that statins could reduce this harmful transition. Indeed, endothelial cells treated with simvastatin in a dish formed more capillary-like tubes, a sign of their enhanced ability to grow into new blood vessels.

RNA sequencing of the treated cells offered few clues. The researchers saw some changes in gene expression, but they “didn’t find anything interesting,” Liu said.

It was not until they employed a newer technique called ATAC-seq that the role of statins became apparent. ATAC-seq reveals what happens at the epigenetic level, meaning the changes to gene expression that do not involve changes to the genetic sequence.

They found that the changes in gene expression stemmed from the way strings of DNA are packaged inside the cell nucleus. DNA exists in our cells not as loose strands but as a series of tight spools around proteins, together known as chromatin. Whether particular DNA sequences are exposed or hidden in these spools determines how much they are expressed.

“When we adopted the ATAC-seq technology, we were quite surprised to find a really robust epigenetic change of the chromatin,” Liu said.

ATAC-seq revealed that simvastatin-treated cells had closed chromatin structures that reduced the expression of genes that cause the endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition. Working backward, the researchers found that simvastatin prevents a protein known as YAP from entering the nucleus and opening chromatin.

The YAP protein is known to play important roles in development, such as regulating the size of our organs, but also has been implicated in the abnormal cell growth seen in cancer.

A look at diabetes

To see the drug in context, the researchers tested simvastatin on diabetic mice. Diabetes causes subtle changes to blood vessels that mimic the damage commonly seen in people who are prescribed statins — older patients who do not have a cardiovascular condition, Liu said. 

They found that after eight weeks on simvastatin, the diabetic mice had significantly improved vascular function, with arteries that more easily relaxed and contracted.

“If we can understand the mechanism, we can fine-tune this drug to be more specific to rescuing vascular function,” Liu said.

The findings also provide a more detailed picture of the vascular disease process, which could help doctors identify and treat early signs of vascular damage.

Statins Trial in HIV Patients Ended Early Due to Efficacy

Colourised scanning electron micrograph of HIV (yellow) infecting a human T9 cell (blue). Credit: NIH

A large randomised controlled trial into using statins in people with HIV and low-to-moderate cardiovascular risk was stopped early due to clear benefits, according to an update posted online in JAMA Network. Participants, who were taking 4mg pitavastatin calcium daily, saw a 35% reduction in risk with no significant difference in adverse events compared to placebo, according to the National Institutes of Health.

This recommendation came after a planned interim analysis of data from the Randomized Trial to Prevent Vascular Events in HIV (REPRIEVE) study, which enrolled 7769 participants, across 12 countries across Asia, Europe, North America, South America and Africa. Participants were aged 40–75 years, had 100 cells/mmof blood at enrollment, and had low-to-moderate traditional cardiovascular disease risk that would not typically be considered for statin treatment. 

It was not clear if statins would have the same effect in people living with HIV and who have premature cardiovascular disease despite having low-to-moderate traditional risk. The interim analysis was compelling enough that the study’s independent Data Safety and Monitoring Board recommended at its latest regular meeting that it be halted early given adequate evidence of efficacy.

The study participants are being notified of the findings and will continue to be monitored for several months. Study results from the review are expected to be published in the coming weeks.

Bempedoic Acid Could be a Viable Alternative to Statins

Photo by Towfiqu Barbhuiya on Unsplash

Bempedoic acid, a new cholesterol-lowering drug, has the potential to be an effective substitute for patients who can’t tolerate statins. Bempedoic acid is an ATP citrate lyase inhibitor that reduces low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels and is associated with a low incidence of muscle-related adverse events. Its effects on cardiovascular outcomes were uncertain, so researchers used a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial to determine outcomes on a variety of cardiovascular measures in statins-intolerant patients.

The study, published in the New England Journal of Medicine, recruited patients aged 18–85 years at increased cardiovascular risk and unable or unwilling to take statins due to adverse effects. Patients were first tested with placebo over a 4-week run-in period, and were not randomised if they experience unacceptable adverse effects or if adherence was less than 80%. The 13 970 patients who successfully completed run-in were randomised to receive bempedoic acid 180mg orally per day or matching placebo. 

The mean LDL cholesterol level at baseline was 139.0mg/dL in both groups, and after 6 months, the reduction in the level was greater with bempedoic acid than with placebo by 29.2mg/dL; the observed difference in the percent reductions was 21.1 percentage points in favour of bempedoic acid.

Compared to placebo, risk of fatal or nonfatal stroke, death from cardiovascular causes, and death from any cause after significantly were lower by 13%, after a median of 40.6 months of follow-up. The risk of death from cardiovascular causes, nonfatal stroke, or nonfatal myocardial infarction was 15% lower with bempedoic acid than with placebo, and the risks of fatal or nonfatal myocardial infarction and coronary revascularisation were 23% lower and 19% lower, respectively.

The researchers noted that the LDL-cholesterol lowering effects were similar in magnitude and predicted reduction in cardiovascular risks to that observed with statins. In addition, bempedoic acid did not increase glycated haemoglobin levels or the incidence of new-onset diabetes, unlike statins. Due to the demonstrated benefits, those taking placebo were offered the chance to transition to taking bempedoic acid.

A trial limitation was that it only included patients with statins intolerance, and who therefore had higher LDL cholesterol levels at baseline.

1 in 5 Patients at High Cardiovascular Risk Refuse Statins, Especially Women

Photo by Priscilla du Preez on Unsplash

Heart disease is the leading cause of death worldwide, and statins are a vital medication against it – but they are notoriously unpopular, leading to poor adherence. Investigators from Brigham and Women’s Hospital conducted the first population-based study on patients’ nonacceptance of statin therapy recommendations, and published their results in JAMA Network Open.

The study found that in patients at high risk of developing cardiovascular disease, over 20% refused to take statin medications. They were particularly surprised to see that women were about 20% more likely than men to refuse statin therapy when it was first suggested by their physician, and 50% more likely than men to never accept the recommendation. The study also showed that all patients who refused statin therapy developed higher LDL cholesterol levels, likely increasing their risk even further.

“Our study highlights the alarming number of patients who refuse statins and signals that physicians must have discussions with patients about why,” says Alex Turchin, MD, MS, an associate professor at Harvard Medical School and director of quality in the Brigham’s Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Hypertension. “We need to better understand what our patients’ preferences are and to be able to provide more patient-centered care.”

After Turchin began noticing that many of his patients with high cholesterol, including those with diabetes, were opting not to take safe and beneficial medications like statins that can lower cholesterol and bring down the risk of heart attack and stroke, he developed a system to more closely study the phenomenon by analysing the text of provider notes.

The study focused on high-risk patients who either had coronary artery or vascular disease, diabetes, very high cholesterol, or had suffered a stroke. All were recommended statin medications by their physicians to reduce their risk of heart attack and stroke and reduce cholesterol levels. The retrospective study included more than 24 000 patients who were seen at Mass General Brigham between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2018.

“Even in this higher-risk patient population, so many people did not accept statin therapy,” Turchin said. The study found that while about two-thirds of the patients who were being recommended statin therapy eventually tried it, about one-third never did. And it took three times as long for people in the study who initially said no to taking statin medications to reduce their LDL cholesterol levels to less than 100, compared to people who initially said yes.

The study’s biggest surprise, however, was the much higher rate of refusal by women than men. Turchin and his colleagues wonder if this might be due in part to a false misconception that heart disease impacts men more than women, and plan to further research the reasons underlying these results.

“Ultimately, we need to talk to our patients and find out in more detail why they would prefer not to take statins,” Turchin says. He is currently looking at the impacts of nonacceptance of statin therapy on outcomes that matter to most to patients including heart attacks, strokes, and death. “I think people underestimate how much of a difference modern medicine has made in extending people’s lives, and their quality of life, and medications can play a big role in that.”

Source: Brigham and Women’s Hospital

Statins Found to Reduce Intracerebral Haemorrhage Risk

Credit: American Heart Association

People taking statins may have a lower risk of having an intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH), according to a new study published in the journal Neurology.

It has been suggested that statins increase the risk of ICH in people with a history of stroke, which has led to a precautionary principle of avoiding statins in patients with prior intracerebral haemorrhage. Recent research suggests that such prescribing reticence may be unfounded and potentially harmful when considering the well-established benefits of statins.

“While statins have been shown to reduce the risk of stroke from blood clots, there has been conflicting research on whether statin use increases or decreases the risk of a person having a first intracerebral haemorrhage,” said study author David Gaist, MD, PhD, of the University of Southern Denmark in Odense. “For our study, we looked at the lobe and non-lobe areas of the brain to see if location was a factor for statin use and the risk of a first intracerebral haemorrhage. We found that those who used a statin had a lower risk of this type of bleeding stroke in both areas of the brain. The risk was even lower with long-term statin use.”

The lobe area of the brain includes most of the cerebrum, including the frontal, parietal, temporal and occipital lobes. The non-lobe area primarily includes the basal ganglia, thalamus, cerebellum and brainstem.

For the study, researchers looked at health records in Denmark and identified 989 people, average age 76, who had an ICH in the lobe area of the brain. They were compared to 39 500 matched controls.

They also looked at 1175 people, average age of 75, who had an ICH in the non-lobe parts of the brain. They were compared to 46 755 matched controls. Prescription data was used to determine information on statin use.

Of the total participants, 6.8% who had a stroke had been taking statins for five or more years, compared to 8.6% of those who did not have a stroke.

After adjusting for factors such as hypertension, diabetes, and alcohol use, researchers found that people currently using statins had a 17% lower risk of having a stroke in the lobe areas of the brain and a 16% lower risk of stroke in the non-lobe areas of the brain.

In addition, longer use of statins was associated with a lower risk of stroke in both areas of the brain. With more than five years of statin use, people had a 33% lower risk of having a stroke in the lobe area of the brain and a 38% lower risk of stroke in the non-lobe area of the brain.

“It’s reassuring news for people taking statins that these medications seem to reduce the risk of bleeding stroke as well as the risk of stroke from blood clots,” Gaist added. “However, our research was done in only the Danish population, which is primarily people of European ancestry. More research should be conducted in other populations.”

Source: American Academy of Neurology

Vitamin D is no Help for Statin Muscle Pains, Study Finds

Vitamin D pills
Photo by Michele Blackwell on Unsplash

Some clinicians have recommended vitamin D supplements to ease the muscle aches of patients taking a statin, but a new study published in the journal JAMA Cardiology shows the vitamin appears to have no substantial impact.

While non-randomised studies have reported vitamin D to be an effective treatment for statin-associated muscle symptoms, the new study, which is the first randomised clinical trial to look at the effect of vitamin D on statin-associated muscle symptoms, was large enough to rule out any important benefits.

In the randomised, double-blind trial, 2083 participants took either 2000 units of vitamin D supplements daily or a placebo. The study found participants in both categories were equally likely to develop muscle symptoms and discontinue statin therapy.

Over 4.8 years of follow-up, statin-related muscle pain was reported by 31% of the participants assigned vitamin D and 31% assigned a placebo.

“We had high hopes that vitamin D would be effective because in our clinic and across the country, statin-associated muscle symptoms were a major reason why so many patients stopped taking their statin medication,” said senior author Dr Neil Stone, professor at Northwestern University. “So, it was very disappointing that vitamin D failed a rigorous test. Nevertheless, it’s important to avoid using ineffective treatments and instead focus on research that can provide an answer.”

Statins and vitamin D supplements are two of the most commonly used medications in American adults. About 30 to 35 million Americans are prescribed statins, and about half of the population aged 60 and older take a vitamin D supplement.

“We took advantage of a large placebo-controlled randomised trial to test whether vitamin D would reduce statin-associated muscle symptoms and help patients keep taking their statins,” said lead study author Dr Mark Hlatky, a professor of health policy and cardiovascular medicine at Stanford. “The placebo control in the study was important because if people think vitamin D is supposed to reduce their muscle pains, they just might feel better while taking it, even if vitamin D has no specific effect.”

Trial was a sub study within a larger clinical trial

The 2083 patients were among the larger cohort of participants in the VITamin D and Omega-3 Trial (VITAL), which randomised nearly 26 000 participants to double-blind vitamin D supplementation to determine whether it would prevent cardiovascular disease and cancer. This provided researchers a unique opportunity to test whether vitamin D reduces muscle symptoms among participants who initiated statins during the follow-up period of the larger VITAL trial. The mean age of the study participants was 67, and 51% were women.

“Randomised clinical trials are important because many very good ideas don’t work as well as we had hoped when they are put to the test,” Hlatky said. “Statistical associations do not prove a cause-and-effect relationship. Low levels of vitamin D are associated with many medical problems, but it turns out that giving people vitamin D does not generally fix those problems.”

For patients who report statin-associated muscle pains

Dr Stone noted that sometimes the secret for understanding patients who have difficulty with statins is analysing other medications they’re taking, determining whether or not they have associated metabolic or inflammatory conditions, counselling them on their ability to hydrate adequately and, importantly, discussing “pill anxiety.”

“For those who have difficulties with statins, a systematic appraisal by a physician with experience in dealing with these matters is still very important,” Stone said.

Source: Northwestern University