Tag: immunotherapy

Unique Immunotherapy Could be the ‘Holy Grail’ for a Wide Range of Cancers

Next step is testing ‘holy grail’ therapy’s safety and effectiveness in patients

Squamous cancer cell being attacked by cytotoxic T cells. Image by National Cancer Institute on Unsplash

A new, highly potent class of immunotherapeutics with unique Velcro-like binding properties can kill diverse cancer types without harming normal tissue, University of California, Irvine cancer researchers have demonstrated.

A team led by Michael Demetriou, MD, PhD, reported that by targeting cancer-associated complex carbohydrate chains called glycans with binding proteins, they could penetrate the protective shields of tumor cells and trigger their death without toxicity to surrounding tissue.

Their biologically engineered immunotherapies – glycan-dependent T cell recruiter (GlyTR, pronounced ‘glitter’) compounds, GlyTR1 and GlyTR 2 – proved safe and effective in models for a spectrum of cancers, including those of the breast, colon, lung, ovaries, pancreas and prostate, the researchers reported in the journal Cell.

“It’s the holy grail – one treatment to kill virtually all cancers,” said Demetriou, a professor of neurology, microbiology and molecular genetics at the UC Irvine School of Medicine and the paper’s corresponding author. “GlyTR’s velcro-like sugar-binding technology addresses the two major issues limiting current cancer immunotherapies: distinguishing cancer from normal tissue and cancer’s ability to suppress the immune system.”

The researchers were awarded a Cancer Moonshot Initiative grant from the National Cancer Institute in 2018 for this study.

Landmark research

The study’s publication, the culmination of a decade of research, is a watershed moment and source of pride for UC Irvine and the UCI Health Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center.

“This landmark study is a paradigm shift with the very real potential to change how we treat cancer patients,” said Marian Waterman, PhD, former deputy director of research at the cancer centre and champion of the project since Demetriou and his then-postdoctoral fellow, Raymond W. Zhou, the study’s first author, began working on the concept in 2015.

Added Richard A. Van Etten, MD, PhD, director of the cancer centre and also an early supporter of the GlyTR project, “This novel technology may, for the first time, allow the widespread application of targeted T-cell therapy to solid tumours, which is the ‘holy grail’ in the immuno-oncology field.”

Current treatments, such as chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T therapy, use the body’s white blood cells to attack cancer. They have largely worked only for blood cancers, such as leukaemia. The GlyTR technology also proved effective in targeting leukaemia, the study shows.    

Unorthodox approach

While many cancer researchers have sought protein biomarkers for specific cancers, Demetriou and Zhou aimed at a more abundant target, the unique coating of glycans that surround cancer cells but are found in very low density in normal cells.

These complex sugar chains are the most widespread cancer antigens known, but were generally ignored by researchers because they are inert to the immune system.

To solve this problem, Demetriou and Zhou engineered the GlyTR compounds to attach themselves, Velcro-like, to glycan-dense cancer cells while ignoring low-glycan-density normal cells. Once attached, the GlyTR compounds identify the cancer cells as targets for killing by the body’s immune system.   

In contrast, current cancer  immunotherapies attack cells based on specific proteins regardless of their glycan density and thereby fail to distinguish tumour cells from healthy tissue.

A second impediment to developing broadly active cancer immunotherapies is the shield glycans form around solid tumours.

By targeting glycans and blanketing the tumour cells with the Velcro-like compounds, the GlyTR technology overcomes both obstacles.  

Human trials

The next step will be testing the therapy’s safety and effectiveness in humans. Clinical grade GlyTR1 protein manufacturing is already being developed at the NCI Experimental Therapeutics program labs in Maryland, Demetriou said.

That will enable the launch of a phase 1 clinical trial, which could begin within about two years. It will test the therapy in patients with a range of metastatic solid cancers. The highest glycan density is typically seen in patients with refractory/metastatic disease, a population that also has the greatest unmet need for treatment.

Source: University of California – Irvine

Lymph Nodes Found to be Key to Successful Cancer Immunotherapy

Swollen lymph nodes. Credit: Scientific Animations CC0

New research has shown why preserving lymph nodes, often removed near tumours to prevent cancer spread, could improve patient outcomes and make immunotherapies more effective.

A team of researchers, led by the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity (Doherty Institute), explored the cellular and molecular interactions revealing how lymph nodes play a crucial role in the fight against chronic infection and cancer.

The research, published across two papers in Nature Immunology (references and links below), showed that lymph nodes provide the right environment for stem-like T cells, an important type of immune cell, to survive, multiply and produce killer cells that can fight cancer or viruses. In other immune organs, such as the spleen, these cells don’t develop or proliferate as effectively, making lymph nodes essential for a strong immune response and successful immunotherapy.

The University of Melbourne’s Professor Axel Kallies, Laboratory Head at the Doherty Institute and senior author of both papers, said the findings have important implications for cancer therapy.

“Lymph nodes aren’t just passive waiting rooms for immune cells, they actively train and educate T cells, and send them off to do their job,” said Professor Kallies.

“Our research suggests that removing lymph nodes during cancer surgery, a common practice to prevent tumour spread, may inadvertently reduce the effectiveness of treatments, such as checkpoint blockade and CAR T cell therapies. Preserving lymph nodes could strengthen immune responses and increase the effectiveness of immunotherapy.”

This work may also help explain why some patients respond better to immunotherapy than others. The state and function of lymph nodes influence how well the immune system can produce cancer-fighting T cells, directly impacting the success of immunotherapy.

The University of Melbourne’s Dr Carlson Tsui, Postdoctoral Researcher at the Doherty Institute and first author of one of the papers, said the findings could help to develop new strategies to make immunotherapy more effective.

“Our research identifies molecular signals that are involved in the regulation of stem-like cells and in their capacity to produce effective killer cells. These findings could guide the development and refinement of immune-based treatments for cancer and chronic infection,” said Dr Tsui.

“Furthermore, our research shows that rather than only focusing on the tumour itself, therapies should also be designed to preserve and enhance lymph node function. By targeting these critical immune hubs, we could boost the body’s natural ability to fight cancer, increase the effectiveness of existing immunotherapies and help more patients respond to treatment.”

Together, the two peer-reviewed papers provide a deeper understanding of how lymph nodes shape immune responses. While they are based on work with animal models, they will guide future treatment strategies for chronic infection and cancer treatment.

Professor Shahneen Sandhu, Research Lead for the Melanoma Medical Oncology Service at the Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, commented on the clinical implications of this work.

“While this research was done in the laboratory with pre-clinical models, we’re excited to study these findings in clinical samples from patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors, as part of an ongoing Melanoma Research Victoria collaboration with Professor Kallies,” Professor Sandhu said.

“Combining clinical and preclinical studies will help us translate these discoveries from bench to bedside and back, ultimately improving outcomes for cancer patients.”

  1. Tsui C, Heyden L, et al. Lymph nodes fuel KLF2-dependent effector CD8+ T cell differentiation during chronic infection and checkpoint blockade. Nature Immunology (2025). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41590-025-02276-7  
  2. Wijesinghe SKM, Rausch L, et al. Lymph-node-derived stem-like but not tumor-tissue-resident CD8+ T cells fuel anticancer immunity. Nature Immunology (2025). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41590-025-02219-2  

Source: Doherty Institute

Pembrolizumab–Axitinib Duo Extends Survival in Advanced Kidney Cancer

Photo by Robina Weermeijer on Unsplash

A two-drug combination for treating advanced kidney cancer had sustained and durable clinical benefit in more than five years of follow-up, according to a study published August 1 in Nature Medicine

The study reports final clinical data and biomarker analyses from the Phase 3 KEYNOTE-426 trial, which compared the drug combination pembrolizumab plus axitinib versus the single drug sunitinib for patients with previously untreated advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma, the most common type of kidney cancer.

“KEYNOTE-426 was the first trial to combine a PD-1 inhibitor immunotherapy (pembrolizumab) with a VEGF receptor inhibitor antiangiogenic drug (axitinib) in the first-line setting for advanced renal cell carcinoma. It therefore has the longest follow-up duration among the various trials comparing these types of drug combinations,” said Brian Rini, MD, a medical oncologist at Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Professor of Medicine and the study’s lead and corresponding author. 

Immunotherapy drugs like pembrolizumab stimulate the immune system to kill tumour cells. VEGF receptor inhibitors like axitinib and sunitinib block angiogenesis — the development of blood vessels that tumours need to grow and spread. Pembrolizumab plus axitinib and other immunotherapy-antiangiogenic drug combinations are now standard first-line treatments for advanced kidney cancer. 

“Before the development of antiangiogenic drugs and immunotherapies, advanced renal cell carcinoma had a very poor prognosis. These drug combinations have dramatically improved treatment options and outcomes for patients,” said Rini. 

The first interim analysis of outcomes from KEYNOTE-426, published Feb. 16, 2019, in the New England Journal of Medicine, demonstrated that trial participants treated with pembrolizumab plus axitinib had longer overall and progression-free survival, and higher objective response rates compared to those taking sunitinib. The median follow-up was 12.8 months. 

Now, with a median follow-up of 67.2 months, the current analysis confirms and extends the interim analysis and provides valuable information about biomarkers that could help guide treatment decisions. 

The study in Nature Medicine reports that pembrolizumab plus axitinib had longer overall survival (47.2 months versus 40.8 months for sunitinib) and longer progression-free survival (15.7 months versus 11.1 months for sunitinib). The objective response rate was 60.6% for pembrolizumab plus axitinib and 39.6% for sunitinib. 

The researchers reported a variety of associations between the expression of biomarkers and outcomes (overall survival, progression-free survival, objective response rate). The biomarkers they evaluated included an 18-gene T-cell-inflamed expression profile, angiogenesis signature, and PD-1 ligand expression. 

“There is an unmet need for biomarkers that are predictive of patient outcomes following treatment with available first-line therapies for advanced renal cell carcinoma,” Rini said. “Although our analysis showed potential clinical utility of some RNA signatures in identifying patients who are likely to benefit the most from each treatment, further prospective clinical studies are needed.” 

Pembrolizumab plus axitinib is a first-line treatment option for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma regardless of biomarker subtypes, he noted. 

Source: Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Zapping Glioblastoma With Electric Fields Slows Tumour Growth

Source: Pixabay

A new study led by Keck Medicine of USC researchers may have uncovered an effective combination therapy for glioblastoma, a brain tumour diagnosis with few available effective treatments. According to the National Brain Tumor Society, the average survival for patients diagnosed with glioblastoma is eight months.

The study, which was published in the journal Med, finds that using Tumour Treating Fields therapy (TTFields), which delivers targeted waves of electric fields directly into tumours to stop their growth and signal the body’s immune system to attack cancerous tumour cells, may extend survival among patients with glioblastoma, when combined with immunotherapy (pembrolizumab) and chemotherapy (temozolomide).

TTFields disrupt tumour growth using low-intensity, alternating electric fields that push and pull key structures inside tumour cells in continually shifting directions, making it difficult for the cells to multiply. Preventing tumour growth gives patients a better chance of successfully fighting the cancer. When used to treat glioblastoma, TTFields are delivered through a set of mesh electrodes that are strategically positioned on the scalp, generating fields at a precise frequency and intensity focused on the tumour. Patients wear the electrodes for approximately 18 hours a day.

Researchers observed that TTFields attract more tumour-fighting T cells, which are white blood cells that identify and attack cancer cells, into and around the glioblastoma. When followed by immunotherapy, these T cells stay active longer and are replaced by even stronger, more effective tumour-fighting T cells.

“By using TTFields with immunotherapy, we prime the body to mount an attack on the cancer, which enables the immunotherapy to have a meaningful effect in ways that it could not before,” said David Tran, MD, PhD, chief of neuro-oncology with Keck Medicine, co-director of the USC Brain Tumor Center and corresponding author of the study. “Our findings suggest that TTFields may be the key to unlocking the value of immunotherapy in treating glioblastoma.”

TTFields are often combined with chemotherapy in cancer treatment. However, even with aggressive treatment, the prognosis for glioblastoma remains poor. Immunotherapy, while successful in many other cancer types, has also not proved effective for glioblastoma when used on its own.

However, in this study, adding immunotherapy to TTFields and chemotherapy was associated with a 70% increase in overall survival. Notably, patients with larger, unresected (not surgically removed) tumours showed an even stronger immune response to TTFields and lived even longer. This suggests that, when it comes to kick-starting the body’s immune response against the cancer, having a larger tumour may provide more targets for the therapy to work against.

Using alternating electric fields to unlock immunotherapy

Pembrolizumab, the immunotherapy used in this study, is an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI), which enhances the body’s natural ability to fight cancers by improving T cells’ ability to identify and attack cancer cells.

However, there are typically few T cells in and around glioblastomas because these tumours originate in the brain and are shielded from the body’s natural immune response by the blood-brain barrier. This barrier safeguards the brain by tightly regulating which cells and substances enter from the bloodstream. Sometimes, this barrier even blocks T cells and other therapies that could help kill brain tumours.

This immunosuppressive environment inside and around the glioblastoma is what makes common cancer therapies like pembrolizumab and chemotherapy significantly less effective in treating it. Tran theorised the best way to get around this issue was to start an immune reaction directly inside the tumour itself, an approach known as in situ immunisation, using TTFields.

This study demonstrates that combining TTFields with immunotherapy triggers a potent immune response within the tumour – one that ICIs can then amplify to bolster the body’s own defence against cancer.

“Think of it like a team sport – immunotherapy sends players in to attack the tumour (the offence), while TTFields weaken the tumour’s ability to fight back (the defence). And just like in team sports, the best defence is a good offence,” said Tran, who is also a member of the USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center.

Study methodology and results

The study analysed data from 2-THE-TOP, a Phase 2 clinical trial, which enrolled 31 newly diagnosed glioblastoma patients who had completed chemoradiation therapy. Of those, 26 received TTFields combined with both chemotherapy and immunotherapy. Seven of these 26 patients had inoperable tumours due to their locations – an especially high-risk subgroup with the worst prognosis and few treatment options.

Patients in the trial were given six to 12 monthly treatments of chemotherapy alongside TTFields for up to 24 months. The number and duration of treatments were determined by patients’ response to treatment. The immunotherapy was given every three weeks, starting with the second dose of chemotherapy, for up to 24 months.

Patients who used the device alongside chemotherapy and immunotherapy lived approximately 10 months longer than patients who had used the device with chemotherapy alone in the past. Moreover, those with large, inoperable tumours lived approximately 13 months longer and showed much stronger immune activation compared to patients who underwent surgical removal of their tumours.

“Further studies are needed to determine the optimal role of surgery in this setting, but these findings may offer hope, particularly for glioblastoma patients who do not have surgery as an option,” said Tran.

The researchers are now moving ahead to a Phase 3 trial.

Source: University of Southern California – Health Sciences

Immune System the Focus of PhD’s Research at UKZN

Elated at graduating with a doctoral degree is Dr Aviwe Ntsethe. Credit: University of KwaZulu-Natal

Dr Aviwe Ntsethe’s curiosity in the Medical field deepened when he started exploring the complexities of human physiology and the crucial role of the immune system in cancer, leading to him graduating with a PhD.

Growing up in the small town of Bizana in the Eastern Cape, Ntsethe attended Ntabezulu High School, where his passion for Medical Science took root. Despite facing significant challenges, including limited funding opportunities for his studies, he remained determined to advance in the discipline.

Throughout his PhD journey at UKZN, Ntsethe had to juggle multiple jobs to support himself and his studies while conducting his research. He worked at Netcare Education and the KwaZulu-Natal College of Emergency Care, and later took up a position as a contractual laboratory technician in the Department of Physiology at UKZN. It was with the guidance of his PhD supervisor, Professor Bongani Nkambule, that he learned critical work ethics and advanced laboratory techniques. The co-supervision of Professor Phiwayinkosi Dludla further enriched his research experience and contributed to his academic growth.

Ntsethe’s thesis focused on investigating B cell function and immune checkpoint expression in patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia (CLL). The study found that patients with CLL had higher levels of immune checkpoint proteins in their B cell subsets, which play a crucial role in regulating the immune system.

Furthermore, using monoclonal antibodies that target these immune checkpoints, he found these patients could potentially benefit from immunotherapy. Specifically, immunotherapy may improve the function of B cells, key players in fighting infections and cancers, thereby offering new hope for better outcomes in patients with CLL.

He has published three papers from this study. ‘I am excited and proud when I reflect on my achievement of completing this significant journey which was both challenging and rewarding, pushing me to expand my knowledge and skills in ways I never imagined.’

Now, a lecturer at Nelson Mandela University, Ntsethe is committed to mentoring the next generation of Medical scientists. He continues to use the invaluable knowledge and experience he gained during his PhD studies to inspire students and cultivate their passions in research and health sciences. Looking ahead, Ntsethe hopes to expand his research, focusing on immune system interactions in chronic diseases while also encouraging students from diverse backgrounds to pursue careers in Medical Science.

Outside academia, Ntsethe enjoys travelling, staying physically active through workouts, playing chess and indulging in coding or programming.

Source: University of KwaZulu-Natal

CAR-T Cell Therapy Causes ‘Brain Fog,’ Study Shows

Killer T cells about to destroy a cancer cell. Credit: NIH

After treatment with CAR-T cells, immune cells engineered to attack cancer, patients sometimes tell their doctors they feel like they have “brain fog,” or forgetfulness and difficulty concentrating.

A new Stanford Medicine-led study shows that CAR-T cell therapy causes mild cognitive impairments, independent of other cancer treatments, and that this happens via the same cellular mechanism as cognitive impairment from two other causes: chemotherapy and respiratory infections such as flu and COVID-19. The study, conducted mostly in mice, which was published in Cell, also identifies strategies for reversing the problem.

Medications that ameliorate brain fog will enable better recovery from cancer immunotherapies, the researchers said.

“CAR-T cell therapy is enormously promising,” said senior author, Michelle Monje, MD, PhD, professor in paediatric neuro-oncology. “We need to understand all its possible long-term effects, including this newly recognised syndrome of immunotherapy-related cognitive impairment, so we can develop therapeutic approaches to fix it.”

The study’s lead authors are Anna Geraghty, PhD, senior staff scientist in the Monje lab, and MD/PhD student Lehi Acosta-Alvarez.

Cognitive impairment after CAR-T cell therapy is typically mild; patients are not developing dementia, for instance. But it is frustrating and may not resolve on its own, Monje said. In mice, her team reversed the impairment using compounds similar to existing medications or medications in clinical development – meaning a treatment could be available relatively quickly, she said.

“We’re deeply interested in how cancer therapies affect cognition because it affects patients’ quality of life,” Monje said. “And this is especially important for kids because their brains are still developing.”

Investigating brain fog

CAR-T cell therapy was approved in the US for acute lymphoblastic leukaemia in 2017. The treatment involves removing some of the patient’s own immune cells, known as T cells, and engineering them to attack targets on cancer cells. The modified T cells are returned to the patient’s body, where they recognise and destroy cancer.

In addition to leukaemia, CAR-T cells are now used to treat other blood cancers, including multiple myeloma and some kinds of lymphoma, and they are being tested in clinical trials for various solid tumours. Monje and her colleagues have an ongoing trial of CAR-T cells for deadly brain stem and spinal cord tumours in children, which is beginning to show success.

Although patients report brain fog after CAR-T cell therapy, studies to measure how much cognitive impairment the therapy causes are only just emerging.

The research team wanted to get a comprehensive understanding of the situations in which CAR-T cell therapy might cause cognitive impairment. They studied mice that had tumours induced in the brain, blood, skin and bone. The researchers wanted to understand the influence on cognition of CAR-T cell treatment in combination with the tumours’ location (originating in, spreading to or staying outside the brain), as well as the degree to which the engineered cells evoked additional, accompanying immune responses. Before and after CAR-T cell treatment, the researchers used standard cognitive tests on the mice, measuring how mice responded to a novel object and navigated a simple maze.

CAR-T therapy caused mild cognitive impairment in mice with cancers originating in, metastasizing to and located completely outside the brain. The only mice tested that did not develop cognitive impairment after CAR-T treatment were those that had bone cancer that causes minimal additional inflammation beyond the cancer-fighting activity of the CAR-T cells.

“This is the first study to demonstrate that immunotherapy on its own is sufficient to cause lasting cognitive symptoms,” Monje said. “It’s also the first paper to uncover the mechanisms. We found the exact same pathophysiology we’ve seen in brain fog syndromes that occur after chemotherapy, radiation, and mild respiratory COVID-19 or influenza.”

The researchers demonstrated that the brain’s immune cells, called microglia, are key players in the problem. First, the microglia become activated by the body’s immune response. The activated, “annoyed” microglia produce inflammatory immune molecules known as cytokines and chemokines, which in turn have widespread effects throughout the brain. They are particularly harmful for oligodendrocytes, the brain cells responsible for making myelin, the fatty substance that insulates nerve fibres and helps nerves transmit signals more efficiently. Reduction in the nerves’ insulation translates into cognitive impairment.

Examining tissue samples

The scientists also analysed samples of brain tissue from human subjects who participated in the team’s ongoing clinical trial of CAR-T cells for spinal cord and brain stem tumours. Using post-mortem tissue samples, the researchers confirmed that microglia and oligodendrocytes appear dysregulated in the same way the team had observed in mice after CAR-T therapy.

In mice, the research team tested strategies to resolve the cognitive problems. They gave a compound that depleted microglia in the brains of the mice for a two-week period. After that transient depletion, the microglia  returned in the brain in a normal, non-reactive state. The mice were no longer cognitively impaired.

The researchers also gave the mice a medication that enters the brain and interferes with signals from damaging chemokines, blocking a specific receptor for these molecules.

“That alone rescued cognition,” Monje said, adding that the researchers are now exploring how to safely translate the two strategies – transiently depleting microglia or interrupting chemokine signals – in people who have had CAR-T cell therapy.

“This research further illustrates that there is a unifying principle underpinning brain fog syndromes,” said Monje, a member of the Stanford Cancer Institute. “And this particular study is so exciting because not only have we identified the cells central to this pathophysiology, we’ve found a molecular target we can investigate to treat it.”

Source: Stanford Medicine

Case Reveals a Rare Side Effect of Cancer Immunotherapy

The genetically modified CAR-T cells meant to treat the cancer themselves turned cancerous

Depiction of multiple myeloma. Credit: Scientific Animations

Some forms of blood cancer, such as multiple myeloma and lymphoma, are malignant diseases that originate from immune cells, specifically lymphocytes. In recent years, CAR-T cell therapies have become an essential part of the treatment of patients whose lymphoma or multiple myeloma has relapsed. This involves genetically modifying the patient’s own T lymphocytes (T cells) in order to specifically recognise and eliminate the cancer cells using a chimeric antigen receptor (CAR).

One special case is the subject of an article published in Nature Medicine. A 63-year-old patient with multiple myeloma developed T cell lymphoma in the blood, skin and intestine nine months after undergoing CAR-T cell therapy at the University Hospital of Cologne. The tumour developed from the genetically modified T cells that were used in the treatment.

The initiators of this collaborative project, Professor Marco Herling, managing senior physician at the University of Leipzig Medical Center and Dr Till Braun, research group leader at the University Hospital of Cologne, have world-renowned expertise in understanding the rare but difficult-to-treat T cell lymphomas. “This is one of the first documented cases of such lymphoma following CAR-T cell therapy. The findings of this study will help us to better understand the risks associated with the therapy and possibly prevent them in the future,” says Professor Maximilian Merz, who led the current study as corresponding author together with Professor Marco Herling from the University of Leipzig Medical Center. 

The researchers discovered that it was not just current genetic alterations of the T cells that caused the tumour. Pre-existing genetic changes in the patient’s haematopoietic cells also played a role. The researchers used cutting-edge technologies to study the tumour’s development in detail. Various methods of next-generation sequencing – an advanced, high-throughput technology for analysing DNA and RNA sequences – were used to study the phenomenon. Whole-genome sequencing was used to identify genetic alterations, while single-cell RNA sequencing analysed the transcriptome of the CAR-T cells to investigate genes and signalling pathways.  

These methods had previously been developed in close collaboration between the research groups of Professor Merz at the University of Leipzig Medical Center and Dr Kristin Reiche at the Fraunhofer IZI. The close collaboration between clinicians and basic scientists in the field of CAR-T cell therapy allowed for the case to be analysed in a very short time. The University of Leipzig Medical Center is one of the leading centres in Europe for the treatment of multiple myeloma with CAR-T cells and of T cell lymphoma. “This case provides valuable insights into the emergence and development of CAR-bearing T cell lymphoma following innovative immunotherapies and highlights the importance of genetic predispositions for potential side effects,” says Professor Merz, Senior Physician at the Department for Hematology, Cell Therapy and Hemostaseology at the University of Leipzig Medical Center. 

The researchers are planning further scientific studies to better understand similar cases and identify risk factors. The aim is to be able to predict and prevent such side effects after CAR-T cell therapies, which are currently being used more and more widely, in the future. The high relevance of the topic of secondary tumours after CAR-T cell therapy has now been highlighted in a second scientific paper. The same research team submitted a manuscript to the high-impact journal Leukemia that systematically summarises this patient case and the nine other recently published cases of T cell lymphoma from CAR-T cells worldwide. Normally, it takes several weeks to months for peer reviewers to accept a scientific paper for publication. In this case, the manuscript was accepted for publication within a day. “It is important to create a real, data-based awareness of the rarity of this complication, at far less than one per cent, and the mechanisms by which it occurs,” says Professor Herling.

Source: Universität Leipzig

Immunotherapy Lets Children with High-threshold Allergy Safely Eat Peanut Butter

Photo by Corleto on Unsplash

Children with high-threshold peanut allergy who ate gradually larger doses of store-bought peanut butter achieved significantly higher and long-lasting rates of desensitisation compared to those who avoided peanuts, according to a new study led by researchers at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai.  

Results of the trial appear in NEJM Evidence

“Our study results suggest a safe, inexpensive and effective pathway for allergists to treat children with peanut allergy who can already tolerate the equivalent of at least half a peanut, considered a high-threshold peanut allergy,” said Scott Sicherer, MD, director of a food allergy institute at Mount Sinai and lead author of the paper. “Our findings open the gateway to personalised threshold-based treatments of food allergy and will encourage additional studies that delve deeper into peanut and other foods for this approach that might be a game-changer for the majority of people with food allergies.”   

The most common approach to a food allergy is to avoid the food, but in recent years peanut oral immunotherapy – medically supervised, very gradual daily feeding of increasing amounts of pharmaceutical-grade peanut protein – has become an option for individuals with peanut allergies.. However, studies that led to Food and Drug Administration approval of an injected biologic and oral peanut immunotherapy have specifically focused on people who react to very small amounts of food allergens, such as half a peanut or less (considered a low-threshold peanut allergy).

“Years ago, when people with milk and egg allergies were advised to undertake strict avoidance, our team initiated studies that found most people with milk and egg allergies could tolerate these foods in baked goods, which changed the global approach to these allergies,” said Julie Wang, MD, Professor of Pediatrics at the Icahn School of Medicine, clinical researcher at the Jaffe Food Allergy Institute, and co-senior author of the paper. “The research team recognised that more than half of people with peanut allergy can tolerate half a peanut or more, and thought that this group of people might be treatable if we took a different approach to peanut oral immunotherapy. We were thrilled to find that this treatment strategy was even more successful than we had anticipated.”  

To test this hypothesis, the study team recruited 73 children ages 4 to 14 years old. Study participants were assigned, at random, to either test the new treatment strategy or continue avoiding peanuts. The children in the peanut-ingestion group began with a minimum daily dose of 1/8 teaspoon of peanut butter and gradually increased their dose every eight weeks over the course of 18 months, ending at one tablespoon of peanut butter or an equivalent amount of a different peanut product. All dose increases took place under medical supervision. None of the study participants in the peanut-ingestion group had severe reactions or needed epinephrine during home dosing  and only one received epinephrine during a supervised dosing visit.  

Following the treatment regimen, children from the peanut-consuming cohort participated in a feeding test, carefully supervised by the study team, to evaluate how much peanut they could eat without an allergic reaction. All 32 children from the peanut-consuming group who participated in the feeding test could tolerate the maximum amount of 9 grams of peanut protein, or three tablespoons of peanut butter. By contrast, only three of the 30 children from the avoidance group who underwent the feeding test after avoiding peanuts for the duration of the study could tolerate this amount.  

Because the trial took place during the COVID-19 pandemic and some families preferred avoiding close encounters indoors, some did not return to the study site for the feeding test. Using a common statistical technique to account for the children who missed the feeding test, the team reported that 100 percent of the ingestion group and 21 percent of the avoidance group tolerated an oral food challenge that was at least two doses more than they could tolerate at the beginning of the study.  

To test if the response to treatment was durable, children in the peanut-ingestion group who could tolerate nine grams of protein during the feeding test went on to consume at least two tablespoons of peanut butter weekly for 16 weeks and then avoided peanuts entirely for eight weeks. Twenty-six of the 30 treated children who participated in a final feeding test after the eight-week abstinence period continued to tolerate nine grams of peanut protein, indicating that they had achieved sustained unresponsiveness to peanuts. The three participants from the avoidance group who could eat nine grams of peanut protein without reaction at the earlier food test were considered to have developed natural tolerance to peanuts. A comprehensive analysis of data collected from all 73 study participants revealed that 68.4 percent of the peanut-ingestion group achieved sustained unresponsiveness, while only 8.6 percent of the avoidance group developed a natural tolerance.   

“These study results are very exciting and a huge step forward in personalizing food allergy treatment,” concluded Dr. Sicherer, the Elliot and Roslyn Jaffe Professor in Pediatric Allergy and Immunology at Mount Sinai. “My hope is that this study will eventually change practice to help these children and encourage additional research that includes this approach for more foods.”  

In addition to expanding the work to more foods and validation studies of their approach, the Mount Sinai study team aims to determine a better way of identifying individuals with higher thresholds, because the best way to do so currently requires a feeding test that is bound to cause an allergic reaction.  

Source: The Mount Sinai Hospital / Mount Sinai School of Medicine

New Combination Immunotherapy for Melanoma and Breast Cancer

3D structure of a melanoma cell derived by ion abrasion scanning electron microscopy. Credit: Sriram Subramaniam/ National Cancer Institute

A research team at the Medical University of Vienna led by Maria Sibilia has investigated a new combination therapy against cancer. This therapy employs systemic administration of the tissue hormone interferon-I combined with local application of Imiquimod. Promising results were seen in topically accessible tumours like melanoma and breast cancer models: the therapy led to the death of tumour cells at the treated sites and simultaneously activated the adaptive immune system to fight even distant metastases. The findings, published in Nature Cancer, could improve the treatment of superficial tumours such as melanoma and breast cancer.

In recent years, immunotherapies have had significant success in the treatment and cure of a wide range of cancers. However, for some patients, these agents are still not sufficiently effective. As part of a preclinical study, Maria Sibilia, Head of the Center for Cancer Research at the Medical University of Vienna, therefore investigated the effects of a combination immunotherapy consisting of systemic administration of the tissue hormone interferon (IFN)-I and local imiquimod therapy. Imiquimod is an active substance that activates the innate receptors TLR7/8 and used to treat basal cell carcinomas. The researchers employed various preclinical mouse tumour models of melanoma and breast cancer. What both tumours have in common is that they are accessible to local therapy and often form distant metastases.

Effective for local tumours and distant metastases

Immunotherapies use the body’s own immune system to fight cancer cells. Plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs), which are activated by Imiquimod via TLR7/8, play an important role in this process. The study showed that oral imiquimod stimulates pDCs to produce the tissue hormone IFN-I. This sensitised other dendritic cells and macrophages in the tumour environment to topical imiquimod therapy, which inhibited the formation of new blood vessels via the cytokine IL12 leading to the death of tumour cells.
The combination immunotherapy not only had an effect on the treated tumours, but also on distant metastases. It reduced the formation of new metastases thus preventing tumour relapses and increasing the sensitivity of melanomas to checkpoint inhibitors.

“These findings illustrate that the combination of systemic treatment with imiquimod or IFN-I and topical therapy with imiquimod has the potential to expand treatment options for patients and improve therapy outcomes in locally accessible tumors such as melanoma or breast cancer,” emphasizes Maria Sibilia.
“Topical treatment of the primary tumor with imiquimod is essential for this combination therapy with systemic IFN-I to be effective at the treated site and also to clear distant metastases,” adds Philipp Novoszel, MedUni Vienna, one of the first authors of the study.

The results suggest that this therapeutic strategy has the potential to improve treatment outcomes in superficial and thus locally accessible tumors such as melanoma and breast cancer – on the one hand through therapy-associated cancer cell death at the locally treated tumors, but also through the induction of a T cell-induced anti-tumor immune response at distant metastases, which is further enhanced by checkpoint inhibitors.

“Our aim is to continue developing immunotherapeutic strategies in order to improve the long-term prospects for patients who are not yet responding well to these agents,” says Maria Sibilia, who is also Deputy Head of the Comprehensive Cancer Center of MedUni Vienna and University Hospital Vienna.
“As systemic interferon is a well-known cancer therapy and dendritic cells are activated in a similar way to our preclinical models, we believe that the new combination therapy can show an effect in patients,” adds Martina Sanlorenzo, dermato-oncologist at MedUni Vienna and co-first author of the study.

Publication: Nature Cancer
Systemic IFN-I combined with topical TLR7/8 agonists promotes distant tumor-suppression by c-Jun-dependent IL-12 expression in dendritic cells
Sanlorenzo M, Novoszel P, Vujic I, Gastaldi T, Hammer M, Fari O, De Sa Fernandes C, Landau AD, Göcen-Oguz BV, Holcmann M, Monshi B, Rappersberger K, Agnes Csiszar A, Sibilia M
DOI: 10.1038/s43018-024-00889-9; https://www.nature.com/articles/s43018-024-00889-9

Source: Medical University of Vienna

How Checkpoint Immunotherapy also Increases the Risk of Cardiovascular Disease

Source: Wikimedia CC0

Cancer immunotherapy is known to also make patients more vulnerable to heart attack and stroke. A new study led by researchers at NYU Langone Health points to a possible explanation for this side effect: the treatment interferes with immune regulation in the heart’s largest blood vessels.

This new work focused on immune checkpoint inhibitors, which work by blocking molecules embedded on the surface of cells – immune checkpoints – which normally serve as “brakes” that prevent excess immune activity, or inflammation. Some tumours are known to hijack these checkpoints to weaken the body’s defences, so by blocking the checkpoints, the treatments enable the immune system to kill tumour cells.

Unfortunately, this treatment type may also trigger damaging levels of inflammation in the heart, brain, stomach, and other organs, the researchers say. For example, past studies have shown that about 10% of those with atherosclerosis have a heart attack or stroke following cancer treatment. Until now, the specific mechanisms behind this issue had remained unclear.

To address this question, the research team explored at a cellular level how immune checkpoint inhibitors interact with immune cells within arterial plaques. A genetic analysis by the study authors showed that the same type of immune checkpoints targeted by cancer therapies also appear in arterial immune cells, establishing a link between checkpoint inhibitors and cardiovascular events.

“Our findings provide new insight into how a drug intended to target tumours can also prompt a heightened immune response in arteries and increase risk of heart disease,” said study co-senior author Chiara Giannarelli, MD, PhD. “Cancer patients and their physicians should be aware that they may need to monitor for new heart concerns following cancer treatment,” added Dr Giannarelli.

For the current study, published in Nature Cardiovascular Research, the researchers analysed the genetic activity of thousands of immune cells collected from the plaques of 50 men and women undergoing a surgical procedure to address atherosclerosis.

The investigators also explored how type 2 diabetes, a known risk factor for both cancer and heart disease, may make those with atherosclerosis even more vulnerable to the ill effects of checkpoint inhibitors, adds Dr Giannarelli, also an associate professor in the Department of Pathology at NYU Grossman School of Medicine. As part of the study, the team assessed immune checkpoint activity in arterial tissue collected from eight patients with diabetes and four healthy volunteers. Notably, none had a history of atherosclerosis. The results showed that the diabetes patients had less measurable communication between checkpoints, which in turn can prompt increased inflammation.

Other experiments further revealed that taking immune checkpoint inhibitors might make it harder to combat atherosclerosis. Under normal circumstances, physicians typically prescribe low-fat diets to reduce plaque buildup and inflammation. Indeed, the researchers’ experiments in rodents confirmed that such diets boost communication between immune checkpoints within arteries. However, cancer patients may be at a disadvantage because their therapy, by blocking these same checkpoints, may counteract the anti-inflammatory benefits of fat reduction.

“Our findings highlight how cancer, diabetes, and heart disease do not exist in a vacuum, and that it is critical to consider how targeting one of these conditions can affect the others,” said study co-senior author Kathryn J. Moore, PhD. “Now that experts have a better understanding of the interplay between these diseases, they can begin to explore new strategies to lower the risk of unintended health concerns caused by their treatment,” added Dr Moore. She cautions that the study did not directly assess immune checkpoint behaviour in cancer patients. The team plans to do so in future investigations, she adds.

Source: NYU Langone Health