Tag: social media

Categories : General InterestTags :

Meta Faces Multi-billion US Settlement, Spotlighting SA’s Child Safety Gaps

On By ModernMedia
Photo by Emily Wade on Unsplash

Meta Platforms, the parent company of Facebook and Instagram, has agreed to a record-breaking $18-billion  (over  R300-billion)  settlement  in  the  United  States following legal action alleging that its platforms contributed to harm among children and teenagers and failed to do enough to protect young users. The settlement, which involves almost all U.S. states, mandates specific safeguards including default daily limits, nighttime lockouts, and the disabling of notifications during school hours.

While Meta has denied any wrongdoing, the settlement has intensified an already urgent global debate about children’s digital safety. Around the world, governments are taking action, from Australia’s nationwide ban on under-16s to Brazil’s parental consent requirements, the UK’s proposed restrictions, and similar measures being considered in many other countries.

However, as governments and courts grapple with how platforms should protect young users, Pretoria based, Professor Anke de Beer believes the solution must start earlier and closer to home: with education. She is the founder of the Smart Device Licence, a pioneering South African programme designed to teach children and teenagers how to use smart devices safely, responsibly and with greater awareness of the risks they may encounter online before they are given unrestricted access.

“When you give your child a smart device, you don’t just give them access to the world. You give the world access to your child,” says Prof Anke. “The Smart Device Licence is about turning that access into a valuable skill for navigating the digital world responsibly.”

Why this matters now

Children are entering the digital world at increasingly young ages, often gaining access to social media, online gaming, messaging platforms and other digital environments before they fully understand the risks involved. Concerns around cyberbullying, inappropriate content, privacy, online exploitation, excessive device use and digital addiction have made children’s online safety an increasingly important issue for families, schools and policymakers. The latest record action against Meta is one of several developments internationally placing greater scrutiny on how technology platforms operate.

But platform regulation and landmark settlements are only part of the solution. Children also need to know how to navigate the digital world before they are given a device.​

A personal mission becomes a national programme

Prof Anke’s journey from housewife to academic and activist was sparked by a deeply personal family experience involving gaming addiction and its devastating consequences. The experience opened her eyes to the potential risks of unrestricted digital access and the importance of equipping children with the knowledge to make safer choices. What began as a family’s fight for survival became a broader mission to help protect South Africa’s young people.

The Smart Device Licence was developed with input from professionals working across education, psychology and child protection, with the aim of providing children with practical skills they can use in their everyday digital lives, filling the gap left by slow-moving regulation and corporate settlements.

How the Smart Device Licence works

The Smart Device Licence is an interactive e-learning programme covering:

  • Digital citizenship
  • Privacy protection
  • Cyberbullying recognition
  •  Responsible social media use
  • Healthy device habits
  • Online safety
  • Understanding digital risks

There are two levels:

Junior Licence: Designed for primary school learners, focusing on healthy device habits, responsible digital behaviour and avoiding harmful online content.

Senior Licence: Designed for high school learners, covering privacy, adult content, sharing personal images or messages, cyberbullying, responsible online communication and the psychology of digital addiction. Learners complete modules, quizzes and practical exercises. Those who complete the programme receive an official Smart Device Licence certificate. Schools including Rabboni Christian School in Brits are already using the platform. The programme is voluntary. The licence is an educational milestone, not a legal requirement.

Expanding access​

​The Smart Device Licence is available to schools, parents and learners across South Africa.​

“The conversation about children’s digital safety is becoming impossible to ignore,” says Prof Anke. “But we should not wait for a court case, legislation or a crisis, whether in the US or here at home, before we prepare our children. The best time to teach a child how to use a smart device responsibly is before they receive one.”​

The licence fee is R115, including VAT, providing access to the programme’s modules, exercises and quizzes. Content will be updated regularly to reflect emerging technologies, digital trends and relevant developments.

Categories : Addiction Surgeries & ProceduresTags :

Cosmetic Procedure Addiction Risk May Link to Social Media and Body Image

On By ModernMedia
Photo by Freestocks on Unsplash

As cosmetic procedures surge worldwide and beauty content increasingly dominates social media platforms, a new study from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, suggests that for some women, cosmetic treatments may begin to resemble compulsive or addiction-like behaviour. The study, led by Dr Vera Skvirsky alongside Dr Uri Lifshin, Dr Dvora Shmulewitz, and Prof Mario Mikulincer from the Department of Psychology at Hebrew University of Jerusalem and the Israel Center for Addiction and Mental Health (ICAMH), examined what the researchers describe as “addictive cosmetic procedures use,” or ACPU, among women.

Published in the Journal of Health Psychology, the study surveyed 1614 women between the ages of 25 and 71, making it one of the larger investigations to date into the psychological patterns associated with repeated cosmetic treatments. The findings point to a phenomenon that researchers say deserves greater attention from both clinicians and the public. Among women who had undergone cosmetic procedures, 20% met the threshold for moderate to severe risk of addictive cosmetic procedure use during their lifetime.

More than 15% reported symptoms that were active within the past year.

Across the full sample, nearly 9% of women showed moderate to severe signs of problematic cosmetic procedure use. The researchers adapted an assessment tool originally based on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders criteria for substance-related disorders. Participants were asked questions typically associated with addiction, including whether they had unsuccessfully tried to stop undergoing cosmetic procedures, felt compelled to continue despite negative consequences, or experienced cravings related to treatments.

While previous research has linked cosmetic procedures to body image concerns and body dysmorphic disorder, this study goes further by examining whether repeated cosmetic treatments can, in some cases, resemble a behavioural addiction. Unlike earlier studies, which often focused on patients at cosmetic clinics, this research surveyed more than 1600 women from the general population and found that addiction-like patterns were most strongly associated with the combination of low body esteem and problematic social media use.

While cosmetic procedures are often associated with confidence and self-expression, the researchers found that repeated engagement may also intersect with vulnerabilities tied to body image and digital behaviour. Women with lower body esteem were significantly more likely to report addictive patterns of cosmetic procedure use, particularly when paired with high levels of problematic social media use. Participants who reported problematic or excessive social media behaviour were especially vulnerable if they also struggled with dissatisfaction about their appearance.

The researchers also observed smaller associations between addictive cosmetic procedure use and lower feminist attitudes, lower attachment security, and more negative attitudes toward aging, though those relationships were less consistent once multiple factors were analysed together.

The findings arrive amid a sharp global increase in cosmetic procedures. According to international estimates cited in the paper, cosmetic interventions worldwide rose by roughly 40% between 2019 and 2023.

The researchers stressed that the study does not argue cosmetic procedures are inherently harmful. Rather, they say the results suggest that in some cases, repeated engagement may take on characteristics similar to behavioral addictions already recognized in mental health research.

“Cosmetic procedures have become deeply normalised in many societies, and for many people they may be a positive experience,” said the researchers. “But our findings suggest that for a meaningful minority, the behaviour may begin to resemble other compulsive patterns we see in addiction research, especially when low body esteem and problematic social media use are involved.”

The researchers cautioned that the study was cross-sectional, meaning it cannot determine cause and effect. It remains unclear whether problematic social media use contributes to addictive cosmetic behaviour, whether cosmetic procedures themselves influence body image and online engagement, or whether other psychological factors drive both.

Source: Hebrew University of Jerusalem

Categories : Mental HealthTags :

‘We Cannot Ban Our Way out of a Youth Mental Health Crisis’

On By ModernMedia

Social media bans for teenagers lack evidence and pose risks, scientists say

Photo by Vlad Patana on Unsplash

Bans on teenagers’ social media use are gathering pace worldwide. Their proponents claim that social media bans will improve young people’s mental health, but what evidence supports these claims? In their new Frontiers in Developmental Psychology article, Dr Monika Neff Lind and her co-authors argue that there is no solid scientific evidence behind these bans, and reason to believe they could backfire. In this guest editorial, Neff Lind explains why she and her colleagues doubt that social media bans will work, and how bans should be evaluated to determine whether they have any positive effects.

By Monika Neff Lind, PhD

In December 2025, Australia banned young people under 16 from having social media accounts. France, Greece, Spain, Denmark, Malaysia, Norway, India, Egypt, Canada, Türkiye, and the United Kingdom are hot on their heels. French president Emmanuel Macron said, “Banning social media for those under 15: this is what scientists recommend.” American senator Brian Schatz, author of the Kids Off Social Media Act, said, “Studies have revealed that when children and teens reduce or eliminate exposure to social media for longer than a month, their mental health benefits.” Proponents of youth social media bans claim that we have strong scientific evidence showing that bans will improve teenagers’ wellbeing.

As a clinical psychologist and parent, I would be thrilled if this were true, but it is not. We do not know how social media bans will affect youth because we have never studied that question. Let me explain.

Searching for evidence

When we want to test claims like ‘banning social media improves youth wellbeing’, scientific experiments are one of our most powerful tools to figure out what is causing something to happen. In experiments testing the effects of social media restriction on wellbeing, we randomly assign people to at least two groups: one quits using social media for a period of time and the other is the control or comparison group, which continues to use social media as usual. Given the strength of ban proponents’ claims, my co-authors and I were curious to know how strong the experimental evidence supporting their position was. In our new study, we collected and reviewed all of the experiments that have tested whether social media restriction improves wellbeing, and we were shocked by what we found.

Not a single social media restriction experiment has included people under the age of 16. We do not know how social media bans will affect the young people being targeted by them because we have never tested this with them!

To be fair, sometimes strong evidence in adults warrants making the leap to apply the same conclusions to teenagers. But even that leap is not justified here. The experiments with adults show weak, null, and mixed effects, with 40% of experimental studies showing harmful effects (eg, decreased life satisfaction and increased loneliness) or no effects of social media restriction. So even when adults are told repeatedly that social media is bad for their mental health and that giving it up will help, we find, on average, few to no benefits.

Read and download the original article

Unintended consequences?

There is also good reason to believe that bans may backfire. First, enforcing a youth social media ban raises major ethical concerns. Enforcement efforts invade people’s privacy and are likely to hurt marginalized people more. For example, the technology that determines age based on selfie uploads makes more mistakes with young faces and people of color. Banned youth may also miss out on important resources and communications provided via social media, as schools, clubs, and most other youth-serving organizations use social media as a main form of communication.

What happens when enforcement efforts fail? Many young people will circumvent bans by creating fraudulent ‘adult’ accounts or lurking anonymously. They will retain access to social media without any of the benefits of parental controls or content filters enabled by youth accounts. The vast majority of young people oppose youth social media bans, and teens are well known for their defiance of top-down edicts that disregard their needs. Expect more conflict between teens and caregivers, not less.

To recap, we don’t know how social media bans will affect teens, and the bans may backfire. Yet the bans are still happening! Like other policies that consume resources, political capital, and time, it is imperative for governments to evaluate these actions by funding comprehensive assessments of the bans’ impacts.

What next?

The first step in measuring the impact of these bans is to determine if the bans actually change teenagers’ social media habits. Three months in, Australian authorities reported that close to 70% of social media accounts owned by people under 16 remained active.

Second, we need a careful and well-resourced plan to measure both positive well-being and mental health problems from multiple sources, including self-report, caregiver report, and objective behavioral data, to get a full picture of whether and how altered social media use affects youth.

Third, we need creative approaches to capture the real-world impacts of the bans, since true experiments are not possible and effects may be at the community as well as the individual level. For example, we could randomly assign a subset of youth (eg within a certain region) to delayed enactment of the ban. Whatever approach is taken, governments must collaborate with diverse stakeholders – including young people – to rigorously and openly evaluate potential impacts. Rushed or improvised assessment will leave room for politicization and motivated reasoning.

Big Tech has become infamous for ‘moving fast and breaking things’. Policymakers rushing to enact these bans risk repeating Big Tech’s mistakes and compounding the problems the bans are trying to solve. We cannot ban our way out of a youth mental health crisis. Rather than take things away, we should make things better.

About the author

Dr Monika Neff Lind is a clinical psychologist, science communicator, and researcher in digital mental health based at the University of California Irvine. See more of her work here.

Source: Frontiers

Categories : PaediatricsTags :

Use of Social Media Linked to ADHD-like Symptoms in Kids

On By ModernMedia

Increased ADHD-related symptoms in children were linked to social media use, but not video games and television

Photo by Emily Wade on Unsplash

Children who spend a significant amount of time on social media tend to experience a gradual decline in their ability to concentrate. This is according to a comprehensive study from Karolinska Institutet, published in Pediatrics Open Science, where researchers followed more than 8000 children from around age 10 through age 14.

The use of screens and digital media has risen sharply in the past 15 years, coinciding with an increase in ADHD diagnoses in Sweden and elsewhere. Researchers at Karolinska Institutet in Sweden and Oregon Health & Science University in the USA have now investigated a possible link between screen habits and ADHD-related symptoms.

The study followed 8324 children aged 9–10 in the USA for four years, with the children reporting how much time they spent on social media, watching TV/videos and playing video games, and their parents assessing their levels of attention and hyperactivity/impulsiveness. 

Social media stands out

Children who spent a significant amount of time on social media platforms, such as Instagram, Snapchat, TikTok, Facebook, Twitter or Messenger, gradually developed inattention symptoms; there was no such association, however, for watching television or playing video games.

“Our study suggests that it is specifically social media that affects children’s ability to concentrate,” says Torkel Klingberg, professor of cognitive neuroscience at the Department of Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet. “Social media entails constant distractions in the form of messages and notifications, and the mere thought of whether a message has arrived can act as a mental distraction. This affects the ability to stay focused and could explain the association.”

Significance at population level

The association was not influenced by socioeconomic background or a genetic predisposition towards ADHD. Additionally, children who already had symptoms of inattentiveness did not start to use social media more, which suggests that the association leads from use to symptoms and not vice versa.

The researchers found no increase in hyperactive/impulsive behaviour. The effect on concentration was small at the individual level. At a population level, however, it could have a significant impact.

“Greater consumption of social media might explain part of the increase we’re seeing in ADHD diagnoses, even if ADHD is also associated with hyperactivity, which didn’t increase in our study,” says Professor Klingberg.

Well-informed decisions

The researchers stress that the results do not imply that all children who use social media develop concentration difficulties, but there is reason to discuss age limits and platform design. In the study, the average time spent on social media rose from approximately 30 minutes a day for 9-year-olds to 2.5 hours for 13-year-olds, despite the fact that many platforms set their minimum age requirement at 13. 

“We hope that our findings will help parents and policymakers make well-informed decisions on healthy digital consumption that support children’s cognitive development,” says the study’s first author Samson Nivins, postdoctoral researcher at the Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, Karolinska Institutet.

The researchers now plan to follow the children after the age of 14 to see if this association holds. 

Source: Karolinska Institutet

Categories : Mental Health PaediatricsTags :

Social Media Use Drives Distrust Among Gen Z Teenage Girls

On By ModernMedia
Photo by Freestocks on Unsplash

Social media use in adolescence is linked to delayed bedtimes, negative self-image and, especially among teenage girls, greater distrust, shows a new study from University College London. In turn, these changes are associated with more symptoms of depression and anxiety, risk of self-harm, and suicidal behaviours several years later. 

Published in Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, the study examined how use of social media on the cusp of adolescence (11-years-old) was indirectly associated with a range of psychiatric symptoms, including psychological distress, self-harm and suicidal behaviours, in late adolescence (17-years-old). 

The study found three mechanisms linking social media use in early adolescence to small overall increases in subsequent mental health problems. Both boys and girls who were using social media from early on (at age 11) tended to sleep a little later on average, and had more negative thoughts about their physical appearance at age 14, compared to those who had not used social media. Crucially, teenage girls who had been using social media at age 11 reported greater distrust of other people at age 14.  

The three key mechanisms, which involved later bedtimes, more negative perceptions of body image, and distrust, mediated the association between early social media use and subsequent mental health problems. These small but significant relationships held true even after adjusting for socioeconomic and demographic factors, any maternal mental health problems, and children’s prior mental health difficulties (at age 7).  

The findings were based on data from the UK’s nationally representative Millennium Cohort Study, which was designed to track the lives of around 19 000 children born in 2000 to 2001 (and who belong to ‘Gen Z’, that is, children born between 1997 and 2012).  

During 2011-2012, at around age 11, the participants were asked: “How often do you visit a social networking website on the internet, such as Facebook or Bebo?”. Around three years later, they were followed up and asked about their usual bedtime, their trust in others, and their self-perception. A range of mental health challenges were subsequently tracked another three years later, at age 17. 

Lead author, Dr Dimitris Tsomokos (UCL Institute of Education) said: “These findings suggest that interpersonal distrust was a significant driver of psychiatric symptoms among Gen Z girls who used social media from early adolescence. 

“This distrust of others may be a particularly female response to the pressures of social media, which can sadly be fertile ground for social comparison, cyberbullying and perceived exclusion.” 

“We know that teenage girls display more empathetic concern and tend to place higher value on reciprocal relationships, and perhaps this is what drives greater distrust among them.” 

As policymakers and parents grapple with how to navigate technology use in childhood, the study’s authors recommend greater intervention in early adolescence, focused on fostering a sense of trust and social safety. They believe this can help mitigate the negative impacts of social media usage on young people’s long term mental health. 

Source: University College London

Categories : Mental HealthTags :

Tweeting at Night Linked with Worse Mental Wellbeing, New Study Finds

On By ModernMedia

Posting on X (previously known as Twitter) throughout the night is associated with worse mental wellbeing, according to a new study from the University of Bristol published in Scientific Reports.

Tweeting throughout the night explained almost 2% of variation in participants’ mental wellbeing, which is comparable to activities like binge drinking and smoking marijuana (as measured in previous studies).

Researchers suggested that actively using Twitter during the night could both disrupt and delay sleep, which could reduce the quality and quantity of sleep, harming mental wellbeing. Nighttime tweeting showed a weaker relationship with depressive and anxiety symptoms (compared to mental wellbeing), although this became stronger after results were split by age and sex.

Seventy-four per cent of UK adults keep their phone in their bedroom at night, while twenty-six per cent say they would check their phone if they wake up in the night, according to a 2022 YouGov survey.

Regulation and guidance for nighttime social media use

The study’s findings support calls for more regulation and guidance for nighttime use of social media. For example, TikTok, the online video-sharing app, introduced the tool “Wind Down” in March this year which shows meditation videos at night to encourage younger users to stop scrolling.

Researchers say top-down approaches to change the user architecture of apps, like TikTok’s wind-down mode, as well as education campaigns to raise awareness within vulnerable groups, could help improve the safety of social media use.

Daniel Joinson, Doctoral Researcher and lead author of the paper, said: “Whilst social media is often treated like a monolith, its impact on mental health will depend on the exact behaviours the user performs and the experiences they have on these platforms. Our paper highlights the potential harm of a very specific behaviour: nighttime content posting.

“Research like ours could help inform interventions or legislation that aim to deter harmful social media use, whilst enabling beneficial behaviours or experiences. This is made possible by having access to actual social media data, which is essential if we are to build a deeper understanding of the relationship between social media and mental health.”

Novel data collection approaches

The research drew on longitudinal data from 310 adults (aged between 18-60+) in the Children of the 90s study who consented and were eligible to share their Twitter data, with 18,288 tweets included in the data. Participants’ mental health was measured at multiple timepoints using standard questionnaires, including the Short Mood and Feelings Questionnaire (SMFQ). Importantly, instead of classifying people as simply depressed or not, mental health was measured on a scale, giving a more detailed picture. Participants’ tweets from within two weeks of these questionnaires were included in the analysis, but all others were not.

Uniquely, the study used data directly from Twitter (with the consent of the participant). This enabled the researchers to collect precise measurements of the time of day participants posted on Twitter.

However, the authors noted that the study participants were all adults, almost entirely white, and were more likely to be female. This data was collected during the COVID-19 pandemic, a unique time for social media usage and mental health patterns.

The research team are now looking to understand more about how the patterns of emotion expression and social interactions relate to mental health and wellbeing.

Source: University of Bristol

Categories : NeurologyTags :

Brain Study Shows TV and Gaming Boosts Young Adults’ Focus, Social Media Hinders It

On By ModernMedia
Photo by Freestocks on Unsplash

A world-first Swinburne-led study into young adults’ brain activity has found that TV and gaming are associated with increased focus, while social media is associated with decreased focus. 

In this study, published in Nature, 18-25 year olds exposed to phone screens for only three minutes experienced changes in mood, energy, tension, focus and happiness, explains one of the lead researchers Swinburne’s Dr Alexandra Gaillard. 

“Our study was the first to record brain activity during different forms of screen use on young adults using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS). We found that different forms of screen use, including social media, are associated with distinct patterns in activity and mood states.” 

“Almost everyone owns a smart phone which they use for at least three hours a day for entertainment. Mood disorders are increasing in prevalence worldwide and we shouldn’t rule out the possibility that phones are a contributor.” 

The study found that oxygenated haemoglobin (HbO) levels increased more following social media use and gaming compared to TV viewing, while deoxygenated haemoglobin (HbR) levels increased more following gaming. 

“These findings suggest that interactive types of entertainment really do get the brain more engaged,” says Dr Gaillard.  

“Interestingly, though, when it came to social media, people reported feeling less focused—and those who felt less focused also showed lower levels of brain activity. On the flip side, gaming actually helped boost focus and showed a rise in deoxygenated haemoglobin, which means the brain was actively using more of the oxygen it was getting. In other words, gaming seemed to get the brain working harder in a good way.” 

With six months to go until Australia’s impending teen social media ban, there are still no clear pathways for age-checking tools and the positive impacts of the policy on different types of technology and platforms.  

Dr Gaillard says that while this study looked at young adults, these findings suggest a similar outcome to teenagers which should be considered by experts when implementing the ban. 

“If this is the effect on a fully developed brain, we urgently need to consider the impacts on teenagers and children who are increasingly using these technologies.” 

The Swinburne research team is calling for further research to understand the complex and nuanced relationship between screen activities and how they engage they brain. 

“Excessive screen time can negatively impact cognitive abilities, attention and executive functioning, but we also know how invaluable they can be in forming connections and a sense of belonging as well as improving educational outcomes.” 

“This isn’t a call for blanket reductions; screens certainly serve a purpose for unwinding and leisure. We ask that young people are conscious of how their activity impacts them and that they make choices that are right for them.” 

Source: Swinburne University

Categories : Dermatology PaediatricsTags :

Burning for Beauty: How TikTok Skin Trends Are Harming Young Girls

On By ModernMedia

It turns out when teens on TikTok say, “Get ready with me,” it can be more harmful than they might realise.

Photo by Steinar Engeland on Unsplash

In the first peer-reviewed study to examine the potential risks and benefits of teen skin-care routines posted on social media, scientists at Northwestern Medicine found girls ages 7 to 18 are using an average of six different products on their faces, with some girls using more than a dozen products. These products tend to be marketed heavily to younger consumers and carry a high risk of skin irritation and allergy, the study found.

The findings are published in the journal Pediatrics.

Each teen daily skin-care regimen costs an average of $168 (which the authors estimate typically lasts a month depending on the size of the products), with some costing more than $500, the study found. As the summer nears, the study authors cautioned that only 26% of daytime skin care regimens included sunscreen – arguably the most important skin care product for any age range, but particularly for kids.

The top-viewed videos contained an average of 11 potentially irritating active ingredients, the study found, putting the content creators at risk of developing skin irritation, sun sensitivity and a skin allergy known as allergic contact dermatitis. Prior evidence has shown that developing such an allergy can limit the kinds of soaps, shampoos and cosmetics users can apply for the rest of their lives.

“That high risk of irritation came from both using multiple active ingredients at the same time, such as hydroxy acids, as well as applying the same active ingredient unknowingly over and over again when that active ingredient was found in three, four, five different products,” said corresponding author Dr. Molly Hales, a postdoctoral research fellow and board-certified dermatologist in the department of dermatology at Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine.

For example, in one video included in the study, the content creator applied 10 products on her face in six minutes.

“As she’s applying the products, she begins to express discomfort and burning, and in the final few minutes, she develops a visible skin reaction,” said senior author Dr. Tara Lagu, adjunct lecturer of medicine and medical social sciences at Feinberg and a former Northwestern Medicine hospitalist.

Videos ‘emphasized lighter, brighter skin’

“We saw that there was preferential, encoded racial language in some cases that really emphasized lighter, brighter skin,” Lagu said. “I think there also were real associations between use of these regimens and consumerism.”

These videos offer little to no benefit for the pediatric populations they’re targeting, the study authors concluded. What’s more, given how the algorithms work, it’s nearly impossible for parents or pediatricians to track exactly what children or adolescents are viewing. Lastly, there are dangers beyond skin damage, Hales said.

“It’s problematic to show girls devoting this much time and attention to their skin,” Hales said. “We’re setting a very high standard for these girls. The pursuit of health has become a kind of virtue in our society, but the ideal of ‘health’ is also very wrapped up in ideals of beauty, thinness and whiteness. The insidious thing about ‘skin care’ is that it claims to be about health.”

Studying teens in the TikTok environment

In the study, Hales and another researcher each created a new TikTok account, reporting themselves to be 13 years old. The “For You” tab was used to view relevant content until 100 unique videos were compiled. They collected demographics of content creators, number and types of products used and total cost of regimens and then created a list of products used and their active and inactive ingredients. The Pediatric Baseline Series used in patch testing was used to identify ingredients with elevated risk of inducing allergic contact dermatitis.

Source: Northwestern University

Categories : Addiction Mental HealthTags :

Unhealthy Commodities – Like Alcohol and Social Media – are Connected with Poor Mental Health

On By ModernMedia

Commercial determinants such as social media, air pollution associated with depression and suicide

Photo by Inzmam Khan

“Unhealthy commodities” such as tobacco, alcohol, ultra-processed foods, social media, and fossil fuels, as well as impacts of fossil fuel consumption such as climate change and air pollution are associated with depression, suicide, and self-harm, according to a study published August 28 by Kate Dun-Campbell from the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, and colleagues.

Globally, around one out of every eight people currently live with a mental health disorder. These disorders – including depression, suicide, anxiety, and other diseases and disorders – can have many underlying causes. Some of those causes could be related to commercial determinants of health – the ways in which commercial activities and commodities impact health and equity. Commercial determinants of health can be specifically unhealthy, such as alcohol or tobacco consumption, unhealthy food, and the use of fossil fuels. To further understand how these unhealthy commodities might impact mental health, the authors of this study performed an umbrella synthesis of 65 review studies examining connections between six specific commodities – tobacco, alcohol, ultra-processed foods, gambling, social media, and fossil fuels. The author also included studies looking at mental health impacts of fossil fuel use such as climate change and air pollution.

The umbrella review found evidence for links between depression and alcohol, tobacco, gambling, social media, ultra-processed foods and air pollution. Alcohol, tobacco, gambling, social media, climate change and air pollution were associated with suicide, and social media was also associated with self-harm. Climate change and air pollution were also linked to anxiety. The review brought together many different methodologies and measurements, and could not establish the underlying cause of the negative mental health outcomes. But the results indicate that unhealthy commodities should be considered when researchers attempt to understand and improve mental ill health. 

The authors add: “Our review highlights that there is already compelling evidence of the negative impact of unhealthy products on mental health, despite key gaps in understanding the impact of broader commercial practices.”

The study was published in PLOS Global Health.

Provided by PLOS

Categories : General Interest Medical IndustryTags :

Social Media’s Double-edged Sword: Boosting Connections or Risking Careers?

On By ModernMedia
Photo by Pexels on Pixabay

Social media has become an integral part of our daily lives, revolutionising how we communicate, connect and share information. So much so that insights suggest that over 5 billion people worldwide use social media, with 259 million users coming online within the last year. Closer to home, of the 45 million internet users in South Africa, 26 million use social media. 

Platforms such as Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn and X (formerly Twitter), have bridged gaps, brought distant loved ones closer, and created communities around shared interests and passions. While these platforms have enriched our personal lives in countless ways, they are also a mixed blessing, impacting the professional lives of some individuals in unprecedented ways.

According to Jennifer Barkhuizen, Head of Marketing at MIE, companies are increasingly relying on screening the social media platforms of potential and current employees to gain a window into a candidate’s true self, and provide insights into their hobbies, interests and overall personality. 

“For companies, social media has become an invaluable tool to find the perfect cultural fit for their organisations. However, this practice also uncovers another side of the coin, exposing any unprofessional or inappropriate behaviour that companies may not want to be associated with,” she says.

A significant 70% of recruiters, both across the human resources industry and those within companies, now use social media to screen potential candidates, a trend that continues to grow rapidly. As the digital footprint of individuals becomes more prominent, the trend of social media screening is expected to continue its upward trajectory, reshaping the recruitment landscape.

While the increasing reliance on social media screening by recruiters is bolstering the recruitment process, it is also having a profound psychosocial impact on employees. 

“Knowing that their online activities are being screened can lead to anxiety and a sense of privacy being invaded,” adds Barkhuizen. “Employees may feel pressured to meticulously curate their online presence and the content that they post, which can be mentally exhausting and foster a sense of inauthenticity. The fear of being judged for past posts or casual comments can undermine personal freedom and contribute to a perpetual state of vigilance.” 

Although social media screening helps companies make more informed hiring decisions, it is crucial to acknowledge and address the psychological burden it places on individuals navigating the increasingly blurred lines between their personal and professional lives.

For individuals, balancing positive and negative content on social media is crucial, particularly in the context of social recruiting. Here, studies indicate that positive content, such as showcasing achievements, sharing inspirational messages, and participating in professional discussions, can significantly enhance a candidate’s appeal. Furthermore, positive interactions on social media can create a favourable impression, portraying candidates as engaged, motivated and a cultural fit for the organisation.

“Conversely, negative content, including illicit activity, unprofessional behaviour and controversial opinions, can be detrimental and raise red flags about a candidate’s suitability for a professional environment,” explains Barkhuizen. “So much so that a survey conducted by CareerBuilder found that of the 70% of employers who screen candidates on social media, 54% have decided not to hire a candidate based on their online presence.”

Barkhuizen adds that while people seek to be publicly visible online as they look to share their own ‘personal brand’, thoughts and opinions with the world, it is only when an individual crosses into engaging in undesirable or illicit content that they risk their own reputation and that of their employer.

Despite social media screening potentially leading to anxiety for individuals, it’s a crucial step for businesses to ensure they hire the right candidates. This practice helps protect the company’s reputation by identifying online behaviour that could negatively impact the organisation. It also helps ensure a good cultural fit by revealing candidates’ values and interests, aligning them with the company’s ethos. 

To mitigate the risks associated with using social media during the screening process, Barkhuizen points to five key best practices that HR professionals should abide by. These include:

  1. Develop a social media screening policy: Document a policy outlining the purpose, scope and procedure for social media screening to minimise bias or discrimination. Separate decision-makers from those conducting checks to ensure a fair and compliant hiring process.
  2. Educate staff: Train staff on the legal and ethical aspects of social media screening, ensuring they apply the process consistently to all candidates in the same job category,
  3. Be transparent: Inform candidates about the screening process and obtain their written consent if a social media check is conducted. 
  4. Be respectful: Respect candidates’ privacy settings and only view publicly available information. Avoid “friending” or “following” candidates during the hiring process.
  5. Be impartial and job-specific: Focus on professional information relevant to the job, such as skills and accomplishments. Document information consistently and avoid using protected characteristics like race, religion or gender. To this end, it is advisable to use a third party supplier to avoid bias. 

In today’s digital landscape, where social media is a powerful yet double-edged sword, leveraging the expertise of industry leaders such as MIE can make a significant difference. 

With trusted and innovative smart vetting solutions, MIE’s extensive industry knowledge ensures thorough and reliable background checks, helping businesses navigate the complexities of social media screening to make informed, strategic hiring decisions while safeguarding their reputation and maintaining a positive workplace culture.