Tag: hypertension

Parkinson’s Drug Improved BP in Young T1D Patients

Young people with Type 1 diabetes (T1D) who took bromocriptine, a medication used to treat Parkinson’s disease and Type 2 diabetes, had lower blood pressure and less stiff arteries after one month of treatment compared to taking placebo, according to a small study published today in Hypertension.

Hypertension and stiff arteries contribute to the development of heart disease, for which those with T1D are at higher risk. Those diagnosed with T1D as children have even higher risks for heart disease than people diagnosed in adulthood. Therefore, researchers are interested in ways to slow down the onset of vascular disease in children with T1D.

“We know that abnormalities in the large vessels around the heart, the aorta and its primary branches, begin to develop in early childhood in people with Type 1 diabetes,” said lead study author Michal Schäfer, PhD, a researcher and fourth-year medical student at the University of Colorado School of Medicine. “We found that bromocriptine has the potential to slow down the development of those abnormalities and decrease the risk for cardiovascular disease in this population.”

The multidisciplinary team conducted this study to examine the impact of bromocriptine on blood pressure and aortic stiffness compared with a placebo in adolescents with Type 1 diabetes. Bromocriptine is in a class of medications called dopamine receptor agonists. It increases levels of dopamine, a chemical in the brain, which leads to an increase in the body’s responsiveness to insulin, called insulin sensitivity. Bromocriptine has been FDA-approved since 2009 to treat adults with Type 2 diabetes due to its effect on insulin sensitivity.

The study included 34 participants (13 male, 21 female) aged 12 to 21 years who had been diagnosed with Type 1 diabetes for at least a year, and their HbA1c was 12% or less. An HbA1c level of 6.5% or higher indicates diabetes. They were randomly divided into two groups of 17, with one group receiving bromocriptine quick-release therapy and the other receiving a placebo once daily. The study was conducted in two phases. Participants took the first treatment or placebo for 4 weeks in phase 1, then had no treatment for a 4-week “wash-out” period, followed by phase 2 with 4 weeks on the opposite treatment. In this “crossover” design, each participant served as their own control for comparison.

Blood pressure and aortic stiffness were measured at the start of the study and at the end of each phase. Aortic stiffness was determined by assessing the large arteries with cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and a measurement of the velocity of the blood pressure pulse called pulse wave velocity.

The study found:

  • Compared to placebo, blood pressure was significantly decreased with bromocriptine. On average, bromocriptine therapy resulted in a systolic blood pressure decrease of 5 mm Hg and a diastolic blood pressure decrease of 2 mm Hg at the end of 4 weeks of treatment.
  • Aortic stiffness was also reduced with bromocriptine therapy. The improvement in aortic stiffness was most pronounced in the ascending aorta with a lowered pulse wave velocity of about 0.4 meters/second, and an increase in distensibility, or elasticity, of 8%. In the thoraco-abdominal aorta, bromocriptine was associated with a lowered pulse wave velocity of about 0.2 meters/second, with a 5% increase in distensibility.

“A stiff aorta predisposes a patient to other health issues, such as organ dysfunction or atherosclerosis and higher stress or strain on cardiac muscle,” Schäfer said. “We were able to take it a notch further and show, using more sophisticated metrics, that these central large arteries are impaired, and impairment among adolescents and young adults with Type 1 diabetes may be decelerated with this drug.”

The study’s small size is a limitation. However, the researchers note that further research into bromocriptine’s impact on vascular health in a greater number of people with Type 1 diabetes is warranted; they are planning larger trials.

Source: American Heart Association

Best Evidence Yet That Lowering Blood Pressure Cuts Dementia Risk

Old man
Source: JD Mason on Unsplash

A global study of over 28 000 people has provided the strongest evidence to date that lowering blood pressure in later life can cut the risk of dementia. The study, which included five randomised controlled trials, was published in the European Heart Journal, and constitutes the highest grade of evidence for this preventative association.

Dr Ruth Peters, Program Lead for Dementia in The George Institute’s Global Brain Health Initiative, said that with no significant dementia treatment breakthroughs being made, reducing the risk of developing the disease would be a welcome step forward.

“Given population ageing and the substantial costs of caring for people with dementia, even a small reduction could have considerable global impact,” she said.

“Our study suggests that using readily available treatments to lower blood pressure is currently one of our ‘best bets’ to tackle this insidious disease.”

Dementia is fast becoming a global epidemic, currently affecting an estimated 50 million people worldwide. This number is projected to triple by 2050 mainly from ageing populations.

Current estimates put the cost at US$20–$40 000 per person with the condition each year.

Dr Peters explained that while many trials have looked at the health benefits of lowering blood pressure, few included dementia outcomes and even fewer were placebo-controlled.

“Most trials were stopped early because of the significant impact of blood pressure lowering on cardiovascular events, which tend to occur earlier than signs of dementia,” she said.

To examine the relationship between blood pressure and dementia more closely, researchers analysed five double-blind placebo-controlled randomised trials that used different blood pressure lowering treatments and followed patients until the development of dementia. A total of 28 008 individuals with an average age of 69 and a history of hypertension from 20 countries were included. Across these studies, the mid-range of follow up was just over four years.

“We found there was a significant effect of treatment in lowering the odds of dementia associated with a sustained reduction in blood pressure in this older population,” said Dr Peters.

“Our results imply a broadly linear relationship between blood pressure reduction and lower risk of dementia, regardless of which type of treatment was used.”

Researchers hope the results will help in designing public health measures to slow the advance of dementia as well as informing treatment, where there may be hesitancy in how far to lower blood pressure in older age.

“Our study provides the highest grade of available evidence to show that blood pressure lowering treatment over several years reduces the risk of dementia, and we did not see any evidence of harm,” said Dr Peters.

“But what we still don’t know is whether additional blood pressure lowering in people who already have it well-controlled or starting treatment earlier in life would reduce the long-term risk of dementia,” she added.

Source: George Institute for Global Health

More Older Adults Should Monitor Blood Pressure at Home

Blood pressure cuff
BP cuff for home monitoring, Source: Pixabay

Only 48% of people age 50 to 80 taking blood pressure medications or have a health condition affected by hypertension regularly check their blood pressure at home or other places, found a new study published in JAMA Network Open.

A somewhat higher number (62%) say a health care provider encouraged them to perform such checks. Poll respondents whose providers had recommended they check their blood pressure at home were three and a half times more likely to do so than those who didn’t recall getting such a recommendation.

The findings underscore the importance of exploring the reasons why at-risk patients aren’t checking their blood pressure, and why providers aren’t recommending they check — as well as finding ways to prompt more people with these health conditions to check their blood pressure regularly. This could play an important role in helping patients live longer and maintain heart and brain health, the study’s authors say.

Past research has shown that regular home monitoring can help with blood pressure control, and that better control can mean reduced risk of death; of cardiovascular events including strokes and heart attacks; and of cognitive impairment and dementia.

A team from Michigan Medicine, the University of Michigan’s academic medical centre, conducted the research. The data come from the National Poll on Healthy Aging and build on a report issued last year.

The poll, based at the U-M Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation and supported by Michigan Medicine and AARP, asked adults aged 50 to 80 about their chronic health conditions, blood pressure monitoring outside of clinic settings, and interactions with health providers about blood pressure. Study authors Mellanie V. Springer, M.D., M.S., of the Michigan Medicine Department of Neurology, and Deborah Levine, M.D., M.P.H., of the Department of Internal Medicine, worked with the NPHA team to develop the poll questions and analyze the findings.

The data in the new paper come from the 1,247 respondents who said they were either taking a medication to control their blood pressure or had a chronic health condition that requires blood pressure control — specifically, a history of stroke, coronary heart disease, congestive heart failure, diabetes, chronic kidney disease or hypertension.

Of them, 55% said they own a blood pressure monitor, though some said they don’t ever use it. Among those who do use it, there was wide variation in how often they checked their pressure — and only about half said they share their readings with a health provider. But those who own a monitor were more than 10 times more likely to check their blood pressure outside of health care settings than those who don’t own one.

The authors note that blood pressure monitoring is associated with lower blood pressure and is cost-effective. They say that the results suggest that protocols should be developed to educate patients about the importance of self blood pressure monitoring and sharing readings with clinicians.

Source: Michigan Medicine – University of Michigan

Falling Victim to Fraud Has a Lasting Impact on Men’s Blood Pressure

A new study published in the Journal of the American Geriatrics Society suggests that experiencing financial exploitation, fraudulent schemes, and scams may raise a person’s blood pressure, especially in later life. A key difference in the findings was that fraud victimisation was linked with elevated blood pressure in men, but not in women.

Instead of focusing on subjective measures of health after fraud vicitimisation, this study included objective measures of physical health, specifically, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, pulse pressure, and mean arterial pressure. Chronic elevation of these measures are known to contribute to end organ damage including stroke, cardiovascular disease morbidity, and mortality. 

The study participants consisted of 1200 older adults from the Rush Memory and Aging Project. During up to 11 years of annual observations, participants were asked about fraud victimisation and underwent serial blood pressure measurements.

In men, blood pressure elevations were observed after they had been the victims of fraud. Those elevations, compounded over time, could indicate future poor health. The rise in blood pressure persisted for years after the fraud had taken place, especially in old age.

“These findings show that fraud victimisation has important public health consequences and underscore the need for efforts to prevent exploitation,” said lead author Melissa Lamar, PhD, of Rush University Medical Center.

Source: Wiley

Comorbidities are Common in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome

Photo by Andrea Piacquadio on Pexels

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is the most common hormonal disorder in reproductive-age women. In a study published in Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, women with PCOS were more likely to also have migraine, hypertension, tendinitis, osteoarthritis, and endometriosis.  Affected women were also using medications more often and reported their own health to be poorer than women without PCOS.  

Few studies have systematically assessed the overall comorbidity in women with PCOS, which should be of greater importance given the high costs of PCOS-related comorbidity. For example, PCOS-related type 2 diabetes alone has been estimated to carry an annual cost of $310 million in the UK and $1.77 billion in the USA. The syndrome often remains underdiagnosed despite being so common, and therefore is less represented in national databases, making it harder to assess comorbidities.

The present study included 246 women with PCOS symptoms or diagnoses and 1573 controls who were surveyed during their late reproductive years at age 46.  

“PCOS is often labelled as a reproductive concern; however, in most cases this is well managed with fertility treatments. Our study underscores the need for health professionals to acknowledge the risk for several comorbidities and increased health burden related to this common syndrome,” said senior author professor Terhi T. Piltonen, MD, PhD, of the University of Oulu, in Finland. “Women should also be aware of this risk, and they should be supported by early diagnosis and treatment.”  

Source: Wiley

RAAS Inhibitors Reduce Risk of Intracranial Aneurysm Rupture

Credit: American Heart Association

The risk of intracranial aneurysm rupture was lower in people taking renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibitors for hypertension, according to the findings of a Chinese study published in Hypertension.

A database with more than 3000 people with these aneurysms in 2016–2021, rupture rates reached 23.4% in RAAS inhibitor users and 76.6% in non-users.

RAAS inhibitor use was associated with a significantly reduced risk of intracranial aneurysm rupture (odds ratio [OR] 0.490), and this applied to angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors (OR 0.559) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) alike (OR 0.414).

The RAAS inhibitors’ effect persisted across subgroups by age, sex, BMI, control of hypertension, monotherapy and combination therapy, and location and size of intracranial aneurysms.

The researchers pointed out the safety and affordability of RAAS inhibitors, and suggested that a randomised trial be conducted to confirm whether these medications protect against aneurysm rupture.

Hypertension is known to to increases the risk of intracranial aneurysm rupture, the cause of most subarachnoid haemorrhage strokes.

The authors note that there is evidence suggesting RAAS activation is involved in the pathogenesis of intracranial aneurysms.

“In hypertension, the RAAS has wide-ranging effects on blood pressure regulation through sodium retention, pressure natriuresis, salt sensitivity, vasoconstriction, endothelial dysfunction, and vascular injury. Given these facts, in addition to the directly increasing hemodynamic stresses, activation of the RAAS by systemic hypertension can cause vascular inflammation, injury, and remodeling and thereby contribute to the process of intracranial aneurysm rupture,” they explained.

How inhibiting RAAS would prevent aneurysm rupture was unclear, the authors noted, which could be investigated in a future study.

For this retrospective study, the authors reviewed the records of 3044 adults (mean age 61, 36.6% men) patients across 20 Chinese academic medical centres.

Patients were on blood pressure medications and had an intracranial aneurysm, and split between those whose aneurysms had ruptured (n = 1238) or had not ruptured (n = 1806) by the time of analysis. Aneurysms could be treated by clipping, coiling, and/or conservative treatment.

A secondary analysis matched 541 RAAS inhibitor users with an equal number of non-users, revealing that 17.7% of ruptured aneurysms would be prevented if all patients took RAAS inhibitors.

Besides RAAS inhibitor non-use, other independent predictors of rupture included female sex, passive smoking, uncontrolled or unmonitored hypertension, hyperlipidaemia, and aneurysmal location outside the internal carotid artery.

“Our study importantly extends previous studies of blood pressure control, treating hyperlipidemia and diabetes aggressively, and avoiding passive smoking as second [prevention] for these patients,” the authors wrote.

Limitations include possible confounding variables, as well as key clinical variables, such as blood pressure measurements and duration and dose of RAAS inhibitor therapy not being included in the database.

Source: MedPage Today

Deep Nerve Stimulation Controls Blood Pressure

Blood pressure cuff
BP cuff for home monitoring. Source: Pixabay

A study published in Frontiers in Neuroscience demonstrated that blood pressure and renal sympathetic nerve activity (RSNA) can be controlled by bioelectronic treatment. RSNA is often increased in hypertension and renal disease.

Using a custom-wired electrode, Professor Mario Romero-Ortega previously reported that deep peroneal nerve stimulation (DPNS) elicits an acute reduction in blood pressure. The current study, advances that work, focusing on his development of a small implantable wireless neural stimulation system and exploration of different stimulation parameters to achieve a maximum lowered response.

Prof Romero-Ortega integrated a nerve stimulation circuit less than a millimetre in size, with a novel nerve attachment microchannel electrode that can be implanted into small nerves, while enabling external power and DPNS modulation control.

Using this implantable device, his team demonstrated that systolic blood pressure can be lowered 10% in one hour and 16% two hours after nerve stimulation.

“Our results indicate that DPNS consistently induces an immediate and reproducible arterial depressor effect in response to electrical stimulation of the deep peroneal nerve,” reported Prof Romero-Ortega.

While pharmacological treatments are effective, blood pressure remains uncontrolled in 50–60% of resistant hypertensive subjects. Unfortunately, despite the use of multiple antihypertensive drugs in combination, blood pressure remains poorly controlled in 50–60% of the hypertensive population and approximately 12–18% of them develop resistant hypertension, defined as blood pressure greater than 140/90 mmHg despite the use of antihypertensive drugs.

“In this study, DPNS induced an initial increase in RSNA during the first 2–3 seconds, followed by a reduction in renal activity and mean arterial pressure, despite the increase in heart rate,” said Prof Romero-Ortega. “The observed activation of the RSNA during the DPNS was not expected since its activity is associated with hypertension.”

Source: University of Houston

Gut Bacteria can Reduce Effectiveness of Antihypertensive Drugs

A new study published this month in the journal Hypertension has shown gut bacteria can reduce the effectiveness of certain antihypertensive drugs. The research provides the first clues into why some people not respond well to medication.

Among those with hypertension, an estimated 20% have resistant hypertension, where their blood pressure remains high despite aggressive treatment.

“The only thing doctors can really do in these patients is adding or switching medications and increasing the dose with the hope they can find something that works,” said Dr Tao Yang, an assistant professor at University of Toledo and the study’s first and lead author. “Until now, we haven’t had any clear indication what the mechanism is for resistant hypertension. Our research could provide a first step toward identifying new ways to effectively overcome treatment-resistant hypertension.”

Recent research has focused on the link between blood pressure and the gut microbiome. That work has helped to unravel potential causes of hypertension beyond diet and exercise. However, Dr Yang’s research is the first to examine the impact of gut bacteria on blood pressure medication itself.

In the study, UToledo scientists compared the effectiveness of the antihypertensive drug quinapril in rats with normal gut bacteria against those with gut microbiota depleted by high doses of antibiotics.

Researchers found a clear difference between the two, with animals that were given antibiotics first responding much better to quinapril.

Analysis of the gut bacteria composition in the animals identified the bacteria Coprococcus as the culprit. Laboratory experiments proved that Coprococcus comes, a dominant bacteria species in this genus, can break down quinapril and ramipril, resulting in the compromised blood pressure-lowering effects.

While the study was confined to animal models and lab experiments, researchers did find at least one intriguing case study that seems to support the notion that this could be applicable to humans.

That 2015 report, published in the International Journal of Cardiology, described a woman with a long history of treatment-resistant hypertension whose blood pressure was controlled without any antihypertensive medication for the two weeks she was taking antibiotics for a post-surgical infection. Her blood pressure was able to be controlled with only one medication for six months after stopping antibiotics, before again becoming treatment-resistant.

“This is just one report and more research is needed. However, this suggests that gut bacteria can play a very real and very important role in regulating the efficacy of blood pressure medication,” Dr Yang said.

The research group intends to further explore the interaction between additional blood pressure medications and other common types of gut bacteria.

Though long-term use of antibiotics isn’t a realistic strategy for addressing treatment-resistant hypertension, Dr Yang said it should be possible for someone to alter their microbiota through probiotics, prebiotics and changes in diet.

“The ultimate goal of my research is to identify ways we can specifically target the bacteria in an individual’s gut to improve drug efficacy,” he said. “This has the potential to benefit a lot of people.”

Source: University of Toledo

New Ambulatory BP Monitoring Guidance for Children and Adolescents

Boys running
Photo by Margaret Weir on Unsplash

An American Heart Association scientific statement reviewing new evidence and guidance on ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) of children and adolescents published in the journal Hypertension.

The statement provides simplified classifications for ABPM in children and adolescents. ABPM is designed to evaluate a person’s blood pressure during daily living activities, including times of physical activity, sleep and stress.

Key points of the statement:

  • The statement provides simplified classifications for ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) in children and adolescents. ABPM is designed to evaluate a person’s blood pressure during daily living activities, including times of physical activity, sleep and stress.
  • The new classifications come with guidance on when ABPM is appropriate and how to interpret monitoring results.
  • Children who have medical diagnoses, such as kidney disease, may have normal office blood pressure but significant abnormalities noted on ABPM. Without taking ABPM into account, this can lead to a more benign prognosis.
  • Elevated childhood blood pressure is linked to heart and kidney damage during youth and adulthood, as well as brain changes associated with worse cognitive function.
  • ABPM helps ease concern of spikes in blood pressure caused by measurement anxiety, known as white coat hypertension, and helps assess daily blood pressure patterns.
  • ABPM is used to confirm whether a child or adolescent with high blood pressure during a clinic measurement truly has hypertension.

Source: American Heart Association

Allergies Linked to Increased Cardiovascular Risk

Runny nose and sneezing symptoms
Photo by Britanny Colette on Unsplash

A national US health survey has revealed that adults with allergies are at an increased risk of hypertension and coronary heart disease, with the biggest risk increase seen in Black male adults. The study is presented at ACC Asia 2022 Together with the Korean Society of Cardiology Spring Conference.

“For patients with allergic disorders, routine evaluation of blood pressure and routine examination for coronary heart disease should be given by clinicians to ensure early treatments are given to those with hypertension or coronary heart disease,” said Yang Guo, PhD, the study’s lead author.

An association between allergic disorders and cardiovascular disease was detected in prior research, findings which remained controversial, Dr Guo explained. The present study sought to determine whether an increased cardiovascular risk exists in adults with allergic disorders.

The study used 2012 data from the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), a cross-sectional survey of the US population. In the allergic group were adults with at least one allergic disorder, including asthma, respiratory allergy, digestive allergy, skin allergy and other allergy. The study included a total of 34 417 adults, over half of whom were women, average age 48.5 years. The allergic group included 10 045 adults. The researchers adjusted for age, sex, race, smoking, alcohol drinking and body mass index; they also examined subgroups stratified by demographic factors.

Having a history of allergic disorders was found to be associated with increased risk of developing hypertension and coronary heart disease. Further analysis showed that individuals with a history of allergic disorders between ages 18 and 57 had a higher risk of hypertension. An increased risk of coronary heart disease was seen in male Black/African American participants between ages 39-57. Asthma was the largest contributor of risk of hypertension and coronary heart disease.

Dr Guo said that to confirmed these findings, large cohort studies with long-term follow-up are required. Discovering the underlying mechanism could also help with management.

Source: American College of Cardiology