Tag: hypertension

Categories : Cardiovascular DiseaseTags : Leave a comment

AHA’s New Hypertension Guideline Emphasises Prevention, Early Treatment to Reduce CVD Risk

On By ModernMedia
Credit: Pixabay CC0

Preventing and managing high blood pressure with healthy lifestyle behaviours combined with early treatment with medication to lower blood pressure if necessary are recommended to reduce the risk of heart attack, stroke, heart failure, kidney disease, cognitive decline and dementia, according to a new clinical guideline published in the American Heart Association’s peer-reviewed journals Circulation and Hypertension, and in JACC, the flagship journal of the American College of Cardiology.

The “2025 AHA / ACC / AANP / AAPA / ABC / ACCP / ACPM / AGS / AMA / ASPC / NMA / PCNA / SGIM Guideline for the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults” replaces the 2017 guideline and includes new or updated recommendations for blood pressure management based on the latest scientific evidence to achieve the best health outcomes for patients.

The new guideline reflects several major changes since 2017, including use of the American Heart Association’s PREVENTTM (Predicting Risk of cardiovascular disease EVENTs) risk calculator to estimate cardiovascular disease risk. It also provides updated guidance on medication options, including the early treatment for high blood pressure to reduce the risk of cognitive decline and dementia; use of specific medications including the possible addition of newer therapies such as GLP-1 medications for some patients with high blood pressure and overweight or obesity, and recommendations for managing high blood pressure before, during and after pregnancy.

High blood pressure (including stage 1 or stage 2 hypertension) affects nearly half (46.7%) of all adults in the U.S., is the leading cause of death in the U.S. and around the world. The blood pressure criteria remain the same as the 2017 guideline:

  • normal blood pressure is less than 120/80 mm Hg;
  • elevated blood pressure is 120-129 mm Hg and <80 mm Hg;
  • stage 1 hypertension is 130-139 mm Hg or 80-89 mm Hg; and
  • stage 2 hypertension is ≥140 mm Hg or ≥90 mm Hg. 

“High blood pressure is the most common and most modifiable risk factor for heart disease,” said Chair of the guideline writing committee Daniel W. Jones, M.D., FAHA, dean and professor emeritus of the University of Mississippi School of Medicine in Jackson, Mississippi, and was a member of the writing committee for the 2017 high blood pressure guideline. “By addressing individual risks earlier and offering more tailored strategies across the lifespan, the 2025 guideline aims to aid clinicians in helping more people manage their blood pressure and reduce the toll of heart disease, kidney disease, Type 2 diabetes and dementia.”

“This updated guideline is designed to support health care professionals – from primary care teams to specialists, and to all clinicians across health systems – with the diagnosis and care of people with high blood pressure. It also empowers patients with practical tools that can support their individual health needs as they manage their blood pressure, whether through lifestyle changes, medications or both,” Jones said.

Importance of healthy lifestyle

The new guideline reaffirms the critical role healthy lifestyle behaviours play in preventing and managing high blood pressure, and it encourages health care professionals to work with patients to set realistic, achievable goals. Healthy behaviours such as those in Life’s Essential 8, the American Heart Association’s metrics for heart health, remain the first line of care for all adults.

Specific blood pressure-related guidance includes:

  • limiting sodium intake to less than 2,300 mg per day, moving toward an ideal limit of 1,500 mg per day by checking food labels (most adults in the U.S. get their sodium from eating packaged and restaurant foods, not the salt shaker);
  • ideally, consuming no alcohol or for those who choose to drink, consuming no more than two drinks per day for men and no more than one drink per day for women;
  • managing stress with exercise, as well as incorporating stress-reduction techniques like meditation, breathing control or yoga;
  • maintaining or achieving a healthy weight, with a goal of at least a 5% reduction in body weight in adults who have overweight or obesity;
  • following a heart healthy eating pattern, for example the DASH eating plan, which emphasizes reduced sodium intake and a diet high in vegetables, fruits, whole grains, legumes, nuts and seeds, and low-fat or nonfat dairy, and includes lean meats and poultry, fish and non-tropical oils;
  • increasing physical activity to at least 75-150 minutes each week including aerobic exercise (such as cardio) and/or resistance training (such as weight training); and
  • home blood pressure monitoring is recommended for patients to help confirm office diagnosis of high blood pressure and to monitor, track progress and tailor care as part of an integrated care plan.  

Addressing each of these lifestyle factors is especially important for people with high blood pressure and other major risk factors for cardiovascular disease because it may prevent, delay or treat elevated or high blood pressure.

New risk calculator and earlier intervention

The new guideline recommends that health care professionals use the PREVENTTM risk calculator to estimate a person’s risk of a heart attack, stroke or heart failure. Developed by the American Heart Association in 2023, PREVENTTM is a tool to estimate 10- and 30-year risk of cardiovascular disease in people ages 30-79 years. It includes variables such as age, sex, blood pressure, cholesterol levels and other health indicators, including zip code as a proxy for social drivers of health. It is the first risk calculator that combines measures of cardiovascular, kidney and metabolic health to estimate risk for cardiovascular disease. More precise risk estimates can help guide treatment decisions personalized for each individual.

In addition to the use of the PREVENTTM risk assessment tool, the new guideline recommends two important changes to laboratory testing for initial evaluation.

  • The ratio of urine albumin and creatinine (a test that assesses kidney health) is now recommended for all patients with high blood pressure. It was recommended as an optional test in the 2017 guideline.
  • The guideline also expands the indication for use of the plasma aldosterone-to-renin ratio test as a screening tool for primary aldosteronism in more patients including those with obstructive sleep apnea. (Primary aldosteronism is a condition that occurs when the adrenal glands make too much aldosterone, leading to high blood pressure and low potassium levels.)
  • Screening for primary aldosteronism may also be considered in adults with stage 2 hypertension to increase rates of detection, diagnosis and targeted treatment.

Association of high blood pressure with cognitive decline and dementia

While high blood pressure is a leading cause of heart attack and stroke, the new guideline highlights other serious risks. More recent research confirms that blood pressure affects brain health, including cognitive function and dementia. High blood pressure can damage small blood vessels in the brain, which is linked to memory problems and long-term cognitive decline. The guideline recommends early treatment for people diagnosed with high blood pressure with a goal of systolic blood pressure (top number) goal of <130 mm Hg for adults with high blood pressure to prevent cognitive impairment and dementia.

Tailored approaches to medication for high blood pressure

For many people with high blood pressure, especially those who have Type 2 diabetes, obesity or kidney disease, more than one medication may be needed to lower blood pressure to meet the <130/80 mm Hg criteria. The guideline highlights several types of blood pressure medications to initiate treatment, including angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs), long-acting dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers and thiazide-type diuretics. If blood pressure remains high after one medication, clinicians may individualize treatment to either increase the dose or add a second medication from a different medication class.

The guideline maintains the recommendation to begin treatment with two medications at once – preferably in a single combination pill – for people with blood pressure levels 140/90 mm Hg or higher (stage 2 hypertension). The guideline also suggests possible addition of newer therapies such as GLP-1 medications for some patients with high blood pressure and overweight or obesity.

High blood pressure and pregnancy

High blood pressure during pregnancy can have lasting effects on the mother’s health, including an increased risk of future high blood pressure and cardiovascular conditions. Without treatment, high blood pressure during pregnancy can lead to serious complications, such as preeclampsia, eclampsia, stroke, kidney problems and/or premature delivery. Women with high blood pressure who are planning a pregnancy or are pregnant should be counselled about the potential benefits of low-dose aspirin (81 mg/day) to reduce the risk of preeclampsia.

For pregnant women with chronic hypertension (high blood pressure before pregnancy or diagnosed before 20 weeks of pregnancy), the new guideline recommends treatment with certain medications when systolic blood pressure reaches 140 mm Hg or higher and/or diastolic blood pressure reaches 90 mm Hg or higher. This change reflects growing evidence that tighter blood pressure control for some individuals during pregnancy may help to reduce the risk of serious complications.

In addition, postpartum care is especially important because high blood pressure can begin or persist after delivery. The guideline urges continued blood pressure monitoring and timely treatment during the postpartum period to help prevent complications. Patients with a history of pregnancy-associated high blood pressure are encouraged to have their blood pressure measured at least annually.

“It is important for people to be aware of the recommended blood pressure goals and understand how healthy lifestyle behaviours and appropriate medication use can help them achieve and maintain optimal blood pressure. Prevention, early detection and management of high blood pressure are critical to long-term heart and brain health, which means longer, healthier lives,” said Jones.

Source: American Heart Association

Categories : Cardiovascular Disease PaediatricsTags : Leave a comment

Higher Blood Pressure in Childhood Linked to Earlier Adulthood Heart Disease Mortality

On By ModernMedia
Photo by Ben Wicks on Unsplash

Blood pressure matters at all ages. Children with higher blood pressure at age 7 may be at an increased risk of dying of cardiovascular disease by their mid-50s,  according to preliminary research presented at the American Heart Association’s Hypertension Scientific Sessions 2025. The study is simultaneously published in JAMA.

“We were surprised to find that high blood pressure in childhood was linked to serious health conditions many years later. Specifically, having hypertension or elevated blood pressure as a child may increase the risk of death by 40% to 50% over the next five decades of an individual’s life,” said Alexa Freedman, Ph.D., lead author of the study and an assistant professor in the department of preventive medicine at the Northwestern University’s Feinberg School of Medicine in Chicago. “Our results highlight the importance of screening for blood pressure in childhood and focusing on strategies to promote optimal cardiovascular health beginning in childhood.”

Previous research has shown that childhood blood pressure is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease in adulthood, and a 2022 study found that elevated blood pressure in older children (average age of 12 years) increased the risk of cardiovascular death by middle age (average age of 46 years). The current study is the first to investigate the impact of both systolic (top number) and diastolic (bottom number) blood pressure in childhood on long-term cardiovascular death risk in a diverse group of children. Clinical practice guidelines from the American Academy of Pediatrics recommend checking blood pressure at annual well-child pediatric appointments starting at age 3 years.

“The results of this study support monitoring blood pressure as an important metric of cardiovascular health in childhood,” said Bonita Falkner, MD, FAHA, an American Heart Association volunteer expert. “Moreover, the results of this study and other older child cohort studies with potential follow-up in adulthood will contribute to a more accurate definition of abnormal blood pressure and hypertension in childhood.” Falkner, who was not involved in this study, is emeritus professor of paediatrics and medicine at Thomas Jefferson University.

The researchers used the National Death Index to follow up on the survival or cause of death as of 2016 for approximately 38,000 children who had their blood pressures taken at age 7 years as part of the Collaborative Perinatal Project (CPP), the largest US study to document the influence of pregnancy and post-natal factors on the health of children. Blood pressure measured in the children at age 7 years were converted to age-, sex-, and height-specific percentiles according to the American Academy of Pediatrics clinical practice guidelines. The analysis accounted for demographic factors as well as for childhood body mass index, to ensure that the findings were related to childhood blood pressure itself rather than a reflection of children who were overweight or had obesity.

After follow-up through an average age of 54 years, the analysis found: 

  • Children who had higher blood pressure (age-, sex-, and height-specific systolic or diastolic blood pressure percentile) at age 7 were more likely to die early from cardiovascular disease as adults by their mid-50s. The risk was highest for children whose blood pressure measurements were in the top 10% for their age, sex and height.
  • By 2016, a total of 2,837 participants died, with 504 of those deaths attributed to cardiovascular disease.
  • Both elevated blood pressure (90-94th percentile) and hypertension (≥ 95th percentile) were linked with about a 40% to 50% higher risk of early cardiovascular death in adulthood.
  • Moderate elevations in blood pressure were also important, even among children whose blood pressure was still within the normal range. Children who had blood pressures that were moderately higher than average had a 13% (for systolic) and 18% (for diastolic) higher risk of premature cardiovascular death.
  • Analysis of the 150 clusters of siblings in the CPP found that children with the higher blood pressure at age 7 had similar increases in risk of cardiovascular death when compared to their siblings with the lower blood pressure readings (15% increase for systolic and 19% for diastolic), indicating that their shared family and early childhood environment could not fully explain the impact of blood pressure.

“Even in childhood, blood pressure numbers are important because high blood pressure in children can have serious consequences throughout their lives. It is crucial to be aware of your child’s blood pressure readings,” Freedman said.

The study has several limitations, primarily that the analysis included one, single blood pressure measurement for the children at age seven, which may not capture variability or long-term patterns in childhood blood pressure. In addition, participants in the CPP were primarily Black or white, therefore the study’s findings may not be generalisable to children of other racial or ethnic groups. Also, children today are likely to have different lifestyles and environmental exposures than the children who participated in the CPP in the 1960s and 1970s.

Study details, background and design:  

  • 38 252 children born to mothers enrolled at one of 12 sites across the U.S. as part of the Collaborative Perinatal Project between 1959-1965. 50.7% of participants were male; 49.4% of mothers self-identified as Black, 46.4% reported as white; and 4.2% of participants were Hispanic, Asian or other groups.
  • This analysis reviewed blood pressure taken at age 7, and these measures were converted to age-, sex-, and height-specific percentiles according to the American Academy of Pediatrics Clinical Practice Guideline for Screening and Management of High Blood Pressure in Children and Adolescents.
  • Survival through 2016 and the cause of death for the offspring of CPP participants in adulthood were retrieved through the National Death Index.
  • Survival analysis was used to estimate the association between childhood blood pressure and cardiovascular death, adjusted for childhood body mass index, study site, and mother’s race, education and marital status.
  • In addition, the sample included 150 groups of siblings, and the researchers examined whether the sibling with higher blood pressure was more likely to die of cardiovascular disease than the sibling with lower blood pressure. This sibling analysis allowed researchers to ask how much shared family and early childhood factors might account for the mortality risk related to blood pressure.  

Source: American Heart Association

Categories : Cardiovascular DiseaseTags : Leave a comment

Home-based Hypertension Care is Effective in Rural South Africa

On By ModernMedia
Photo by Mockup Graphics on Unsplash

Home-based hypertension care led to reductions in systolic blood pressure and improvements in hypertension control in South Africa, according to late-breaking research presented in a Hot Line session at ESC Congress 20251 and simultaneously published in the New England Journal of Medicine.  

“Hypertension is the primary risk factor for stroke and heart disease, which are leading causes of death in South Africa. Despite the wide availability of low-cost, effective therapies, hypertension control remains extremely poor in resource-limited settings. Obstacles include a lack of patient confidence to manage their own hypertension care, overcrowded clinics with long wait times and the cost of transport to clinics,” explained the IMPACT-BP trial’s Co-Principal Investigator Doctor Thomas Gaziano from Mass General Brigham (MGB) and Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA. “Our trial aimed to assess the effectiveness and implementation of reliable, home-based, technology-supported interventions to improve blood pressure control in low-resourced rural South Africa.”  

IMPACT-BP was an open-label, randomised controlled trial conducted at the Africa Health Research Institute (AHRI) in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa, in which patients were recruited from two public-sector primary healthcare clinics. The implementation study was designed with Co-Principal Investigator, Doctor Mark Siedner of AHRI and MGH, Professor Nombulelo Magula of the University of KwaZulu-Natal, and the KwaZulu-Natal Provincial Department of Health. 

Adult patients were eligible if they had evidence of uncontrolled hypertension as defined by South African Department of Health Guidelines: two measurements of systolic blood pressure (SBP) >140 mmHg and/or diastolic BP (DBP) >90 mmHg, taken a minimum of 6 months apart. 

Patients were randomised to one of three strategies: 1) standard-of-care, clinic-based blood pressure (BP) management; 2) home-based BP self-monitoring supported by the provision of BP machines, community health workers (CHWs) who conducted home visits for data collection and medication delivery, and remote nurse-led care assisted by a mobile application with decision support; or 3) an enhanced CHW group in which BP machines included cellular technology to transmit BP readings automatically to the mobile application. The primary outcome was change in SBP from enrolment to 6 months. 

In total, 774 patients were randomised. The mean age was 62 years, 76% were women, 14% had diabetes and 47% were living with HIV. 

Compared with standard-of-care, mean SBP at 6 months was lower in the CHW group (−7.9mmHg; 95% confidence interval [CI] −10.5 to −5.3; p < 0.001) and the enhanced CHW group (−9.1mmHg; 95% CI −11.7 to −6.4; p < 0.001). In the standard-of-care group, hypertension control at 6 months was 57.6% compared with 76.9% in the CHW group and 82.8% in the enhanced CHW group. Improved BP with home-based care appeared to persist at 12 months. 

Severe adverse events (2.7%) and deaths (1.0%) were uncommon overall and similar across groups. Retention in care remained more than 95% in both intervention groups, with patients reported to have enjoyed managing their own hypertension.  

Summarising, Doctor Siedner said, “This study is an important example of how making models of chronic disease care more convenient – taking it from the clinic to patients’ homes and letting them play a major role in their own care – can substantially improve hypertension outcomes.” 

Of particular value was that the programme was successful in a community that has historically had low access to care. Professor Magula concluded: “Achieving hypertension control in over 80% of people in a predominantly Black African community in rural South Africa is a clear example that equitable health care access can be achieved in disadvantaged communities. Similar models of care that address structural barriers could be considered to improve hypertension control in other remote and resource-limited settings. Expansion of the model to include the care of people with multiple comorbidities may also be valuable.” 

Source: European Society of Cardiology

Categories : Cardiovascular DiseaseTags :

High-salt Diet Causes Brain Inflammation, Raising Blood Pressure

On By ModernMedia
Credit: Pixabay CC0

A new study from McGill University finds that a high-salt diet triggers brain inflammation that drives up blood pressure.

The research, led by Masha Prager-Khoutorsky in collaboration with an interdisciplinary team at McGill and the Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, suggests the brain may be a missing link in certain forms of hypertension traditionally attributed to the kidneys.

“This is new evidence that high blood pressure can originate in the brain, opening the door for developing treatments that act on the brain,” said Prager-Khoutorsky, associate professor in McGill’s Department of Physiology.

Hypertension affects two-thirds of people over 60 and contributes to 10 million deaths worldwide each year. Often symptomless, the condition increases the risk of heart disease, stroke and other serious health problems.

About one-third of patients don’t respond to standard medications, which primarily target the blood vessels and kidneys based on the long-standing view that hypertension begins there. The study, published in the journal Neuron, suggests the brain may also be a key driver of the condition, particularly in treatment-resistant cases.

How salt disrupts the brain

To mimic human eating patterns, rats were given water containing two per cent salt, comparable to a daily diet high in fast food and items like bacon, instant noodles and processed cheese.

The high-salt diet activated immune cells in a specific brain region, causing inflammation and a surge in the hormone vasopressin, which raises blood pressure. Researchers tracked these changes using cutting-edge brain imaging and lab techniques that only recently became available.

“The brain’s role in hypertension has largely been overlooked, in part because it’s harder to study,” Prager-Khoutorsky said. “But with new techniques, we’re able to see these changes in action.”

The researchers used rats instead of the more commonly studied mice because rats regulate salt and water more like humans. That makes the findings more likely to apply to people, noted Prager-Khoutorsky.

Next, the scientists plan to study whether similar processes are involved in other forms of hypertension.

Source: McGill University

Categories : Cardiovascular DiseaseTags :

Why Common Blood Pressure Readings May Be Misleading – and How to Fix Them

On By ModernMedia

Researchers have found why common cuff-based blood pressure readings are inaccurate and how they might be improved, which could improve health outcomes for patients.

Photo by CDC on Unsplash

High blood pressure, or hypertension, is the top risk factor for premature death, associated with heart disease, strokes and heart attacks. However, inaccuracies in the most common form of blood pressure measurement mean that as many as 30% of cases of high blood pressure could be missed.

The researchers, from the University of Cambridge, built an experimental model that explained the physics behind these inaccuracies and provided a better understanding of the mechanics of cuff-based blood pressure readings.

The researchers say that some straightforward changes, which don’t necessarily involve replacing standard cuff-based measurement, could lead to more accurate blood pressure readings and better results for patients. Their results are reported in the journal PNAS Nexus.

Anyone who has ever had their blood pressure taken will be familiar with the cuff-based method. This type of measurement, also known as the auscultatory method, relies on inflating a cuff around the upper arm to the point where it cuts off blood flow to the lower arm, and then a clinician listens for tapping sounds in the arm through a stethoscope while the cuff is slowly deflated.

Blood pressure is inferred from readings taken from a pressure gauge attached to the deflating cuff. Blood pressure is given as two separate numbers: a maximum (systolic) and a minimum (diastolic) pressure. A blood pressure reading of 120/80 is considered ‘ideal’.

“The auscultatory method is the gold standard, but it overestimates diastolic pressure, while systolic pressure is underestimated,” said co-author Kate Bassil from Cambridge’s Department of Engineering. “We have a good understanding of why diastolic pressure is overestimated, but why systolic pressure is underestimated has been a bit of a mystery.”

“Pretty much every clinician knows blood pressure readings are sometimes wrong, but no one could explain why they are being underestimated — there’s a real gap in understanding,” said co-author Professor Anurag Agarwal, also from Cambridge’s Department of Engineering.

Previous non-clinical studies into measurement inaccuracy used rubber tubes that did not fully replicate how arteries collapse under cuff pressure, which masked the underestimation effect.

The researchers built a simplified physical model to isolate and study the effects of downstream blood pressure — the blood pressure in the part of the arm below the cuff. When the cuff is inflated and blood flow to the lower arm is cut off, it creates a very low downstream pressure. By reproducing this condition in their experimental rig, they determined this pressure difference causes the artery to stay closed for longer while the cuff deflates, delaying the reopening and leading to an underestimation of blood pressure.

This physical mechanism — the delayed reopening due to low downstream pressure — is the likely cause of underestimation, a previously unidentified factor. “We are currently not adjusting for this error when diagnosing or prescribing treatments, which has been estimated to lead to as many as 30% of cases of systolic hypertension being missed,” said Bassil.

Instead of the rubber tubes used in earlier physical models of arteries, the Cambridge researchers used tubes that lay flat when deflated and fully close when the cuff pressure is inflated, the key condition for reproducing the low downstream pressure observed in the body.

The researchers say that there are a range of potential solutions to this underestimation, which include raising the arm in advance of measurement, potentially producing a predictable downstream pressure and therefore predictable underestimation. This change doesn’t require new devices, just a modified protocol.

“You might not even need new devices, just changing how the measurement is done could make it more accurate,” said Agarwal.

However, if new devices for monitoring blood pressure are developed, they might ask for additional inputs which correlate with downstream pressure, to adjust what the ‘ideal’ readings might be for each individual. These may include age, BMI, or tissue characteristics.

The researchers hope to secure funding for clinical trials to test their findings in patients, and are looking for industrial or research partners to help refine their calibration models and validate the effect in diverse populations. Collaboration with clinicians will also be essential to implement changes to clinical practice.

The research was supported by the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC), part of UK Research and Innovation (UKRI). Anurag Agarwal is a Fellow of Emmanuel College, Cambridge. 

Reference:
Kate Bassil and Anurag Agarwal. ‘Underestimation of systolic pressure in cuff-based blood pressure measurement.’ PNAS Nexus (2025). DOI: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgaf222.

Republished from University of Cambridge under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Read the original article.

Categories : Cardiovascular Disease Diet and NutritionTags :

Beetroot Juice Lowers Blood Pressure in Older People by Changing Oral Microbiome

On By ModernMedia
Pic by Jim Wileman – University of Exeter images

The blood pressure lowering effect of nitrate-rich beetroot juice in older people may be due to specific changes in their oral microbiome, according to the largest study of its kind.

Researchers at the University of Exeter conducted the study, published in the journal Free Radical Biology and Medicine, comparing responses between a group of older adults to that of younger adults. Previous research has shown that a high nitrate diet can reduce blood pressure, which can help reduce risk of heart disease.

Nitrate is crucial to the body and is consumed as a natural part of a vegetable-rich diet.  When the older adults drank a concentrated beetroot juice ‘shot’ twice a day for two weeks*, their blood pressure decreased – an effect not seen in the younger group.

The new study, funded by a BBSRC Industrial Partnership Award, provides evidence that this outcome was likely caused by the suppression of potentially harmful bacteria in the mouth.  An imbalance between beneficial and harmful oral bacteria can decrease the conversion of nitrate (abundant in vegetable-rich diets) to nitric oxide. Nitric oxide is key to healthy functioning of the blood vessels, and therefore the regulation of blood pressure.

Study author Professor Anni Vanhatalo, of the University of Exeter, said: “We know that a nitrate-rich diet has health benefits, and older people produce less of their own nitric oxide as they age. They also tend to have higher blood pressure, which can be linked to cardiovascular complications like heart attack and stroke. Encouraging older adults to consume more nitrate-rich vegetables could have significant long term health benefits. The good news is that if you don’t like beetroot, there are many nitrate-rich alternatives like spinach, rocket, fennel, celery and kale.”

The study recruited 39 adults aged under 30, and 36 adults in their 60s and 70s through the NIHR Exeter Clinical Research Facility. The trial was supported by the Exeter Clinical Trials Unit. Each group spent two weeks taking regular doses of nitrate-rich beetroot juice and two weeks on a placebo version of the juice with nitrate stripped out. Each condition had a two week “wash out” period in between to reset. The team then used a bacterial gene sequencing method to analyse which bacteria were present in the mouth before and after each condition.

In both groups, the make-up of the oral microbiome changed significantly after drinking the nitrate-rich beetroot juice, but these changes differed between the younger and older age groups.

The older age group experienced a notable decrease in the mouth bacteria Prevotella after drinking the nitrate rich juice, and an increase in the growth of bacteria known to benefit health such as Neisseria. The older group had higher average blood pressure at the start of the study, which fell after taking the nitrate-rich beetroot juice, but not after taking the placebo supplement.

Co-author Professor Andy Jones, of the University of Exeter, said: “This study shows that nitrate-rich foods alter the oral microbiome in a way that could result in less inflammation, as well as a lowering of blood pressure in older people. This paves the way for larger studies to explore the influence of lifestyle factors and biological sex in how people respond to dietary nitrate supplementation.”

Dr Lee Beniston FRSB, Associate Director for Industry Partnerships and Collaborative Research and Development at BBSRC, said: “This research is a great example of how bioscience can help us better understand the complex links between diet, the microbiome and healthy ageing. By uncovering how dietary nitrate affects oral bacteria and blood pressure in older adults, the study opens up new opportunities for improving vascular health through nutrition. BBSRC is proud to have supported this innovative partnership between academic researchers and industry to advance knowledge with real-world benefits.”

Source: University of Exeter

Categories : Obstetrics & GynaecologyTags :

Age at Menarche Can Offer Clues About Long-term Health Risks

On By ModernMedia
Photo by Marta Branco

The age of menarche can offer valuable clues about a woman’s long-term risk for conditions like obesity, diabetes, heart disease and reproductive health issues, according to a study being presented Sunday at ENDO 2025, the Endocrine Society’s annual meeting in San Francisco.

The Brazilian study found that both early and late menarche – the age when women first get their period– are linked to different health risks. Women who had their first period before age 10 were more likely to develop obesity, hypertension, diabetes, heart problems and reproductive issues like pre-eclampsia later in life. Women who started their period after age 15 were less likely to be obese but had a higher risk of menstrual irregularities and certain heart conditions.

“We now have evidence from a large Brazilian population that confirms how both early and late puberty can have different long-term health impacts,” said study author Flávia Rezende Tinano of the University of Sao Paulo in Sao Paulo, Brazil. “While early menarche increases the risk for multiple metabolic and heart problems, late menarche may protect against obesity but increase certain heart and menstrual issues. Most women can remember when they had their first period, but they might not realise that it could signal future health risks. Understanding these links can help women and their doctors be more proactive about preventing conditions like diabetes, high blood pressure and heart disease.” 

Tinano said the study is one of the largest of its kind in a developing country, providing valuable data on a topic that has mostly been studied in wealthier countries. “It highlights how early and late puberty can affect a woman’s long-term health, especially in underrepresented populations like those in Latin America,” she said.

The study was part of the Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Adult Health (ELSA-Brazil) and evaluated data from 7623 women ages 35 to 74. The age of their first period was categorised as early (less than 10 years old), typical (ages 10 to 15) or late (older than 15). They assessed the women’s health through interviews, physical measurements, lab tests and ultrasound imaging.

“Our findings suggest that knowing a woman’s age at her first period can help doctors identify those at higher risk for certain diseases,” Tinano said. “This information could guide more personalised screening and prevention efforts. It also emphasises the importance of early health education for young girls and women, especially in developing countries.”

Source: The Endocrine Society

Categories : Cardiovascular DiseaseTags :

Controlling 8 Risk Factors may Eliminate Early Death Risk from Hypertension

On By ModernMedia
Pexels Photo by Thirdman

A new study led by researchers at Tulane University suggests that people with hypertension can significantly reduce, and possibly eliminate, their increased risk of premature death by controlling several key health risk factors at once.

The study, appearing in Precision Clinical Medicine, tracked more than 70 000 people with hypertension and over 224 000 without it, using data from the UK Biobank. Researchers followed participants for nearly 14 years to understand how managing these risk factors affected early mortality, defined as dying before age 80.

The eight health risk factors evaluated in the study include: blood pressure, body mass index, waist circumference, LDL “bad” cholesterol, blood sugar, kidney function, smoking status and physical activity. Notably, researchers found that hypertensive patients who had addressed at least four of these risk factors had no greater risk of an early death than those without hypertension. 

“Our study shows that controlling blood pressure is not the only way to treat hypertensive patients, because high blood pressure can affect these other factors,” said corresponding author Dr Lu Qi, professor of epidemiology at Tulane University. “By addressing the individual risk factors, we can help prevent early death for those with hypertension.” 

Hypertension, defined as a blood pressure of 130mmHg or higher, is the leading preventable risk factor for premature death worldwide. 

The study found that addressing each additional risk factor was associated with a 13% lower risk of early death, 12% lower risk of early death due to cancer and 21% lower risk of death due to cardiovascular disease, the leading cause of premature death globally.

“Optimal risk control” – having 7 or more of the risk factors addressed – was linked to 40% less risk of early death, 39% less risk of early death due to cancer and 53% less risk of early death due to cardiovascular disease. 

“To our knowledge, this is the first study to explore the association between controlling joint risk factors and premature mortality in patients with hypertension,” Qi said. “Importantly, we found that any hypertension-related excess risk of an early death could be entirely eliminated by addressing these risk factors.” 

Only 7% of hypertensive participants in the study had seven or more risk factors under control, highlighting a major opportunity for prevention. Researchers say the findings underscore the importance of personalised, multifaceted care – not just prescribing medication for blood pressure, but addressing a broader range of health behaviours and conditions.

Source: Tulane University

Categories : GenderTags :

Males Are More Likely to Get Sick and Less Likely to Seek Care for Three Common Diseases

On By ModernMedia

A global analysis finds sex-based health disparities for hypertension, diabetes and HIV and AIDS

Photo by Towfiqu barbhuiya on Unsplash

In many countries, males are more likely than females to get sick and die from three common conditions, and less likely to get medical care, according to a new study by Angela Chang of the University of Southern Denmark, and colleagues, published May 1st in the open-access journal PLOS Medicine.

Many health policies are the same for males and females, even though there is strong evidence that sex and gender can substantially influence a person’s health outcomes. In the new study, researchers gathered global health data for people of different sexes and ages for three conditions, hypertension, diabetes, and HIV and AIDS. By comparing rates of diseases between males and females and differences in diagnosis and treatment, the researchers sought to illuminate and reduce health inequities between the sexes.

The analysis identified significant differences between the sexes at each step in the “health pathway,” which includes exposure to a risk factor, development of the condition, diagnosis, treatment and death. Males and females received different care for hypertension, diabetes and HIV and AIDS in 200, 39, and 76 countries, respectively. Males had higher rates of disease and higher rates of death compared to females, and in some countries, were less likely to seek out health care and adhere to treatment. In most countries, males were also more likely to smoke, while females were more like to be obese and engage in unsafe sex.

Overall, the study suggests that public health professionals need to develop strategies to encourage males to participate in preventive and health care services. The researchers also highlight the importance of examining health data by sex to understand health inequities and guide appropriate interventions at multiple points along the health pathway. They conclude that we need more comprehensive datasets for these and other conditions so that we can monitor for sex differences and implement equitable health care policies.

Professors Kent Buse and Sarah Hawkes, co-founders and co-CEOs of Global 50/50 say, “We have long advocated the benefits of publishing sex disaggregated data.  As our Gendered Health Pathways demonstrates, such data can reveal where the health journeys of men and women diverge be it in relation to the risk factors they are exposed to, their health care seeking behaviors or their experiences in health care systems. That is an important first step towards health equity. Most of these differences are not explained by sex (biology) alone, but by socially-constructed gender – highlighting the importance of taking a gender justice approach to reducing health inequities.  A gender analysis can help to shape systems of health for all.”

Angela Chang, senior author, adds, “The evidence is clear: sex differences persist at nearly every point along the health pathway, from higher smoking rates in men to higher obesity prevalence in women, yet interventions rarely reflect this. Without sex-disaggregated cascade data, we’re flying blind – unable to detect who is falling through the cracks in prevention, diagnosis, and care.”

Provided by PLOS

Categories : Cardiovascular Disease IT in HealthcareTags :

A New Way of Visualising BP Data to Better Manage Hypertension

On By ModernMedia
Photo by National Cancer Institute on Unsplash

If a picture is worth a thousand words, how much is a graph worth? For doctors trying to determine whether a patient’s blood pressure is within normal range, the answer may depend on the type of graph they’re looking at.

A new study from the University of Missouri highlights how different graph formats can affect clinical decision-making. Because blood pressure fluctuates moment to moment, day to day, it can be tricky for doctors to accurately assess it.

“Sometimes a patient’s blood pressure is high at the doctor’s office but normal at home, a condition called white coat hypertension,” said Victoria Shaffer, a psychology professor in the College of Arts and Science and lead author of the study published in the Journal of General Internal Medicine. “There are some estimates that 10% to 20% of the high blood pressure that gets diagnosed in the clinic is actually controlled – it’s just white coat hypertension – and if you take those same people’s blood pressure at home, it is really controlled.”

In the study, Shaffer and the team showed 57 doctors how a hypothetical patient’s blood pressure data would change over time using two different types of graphs. One raw graph showed the actual numbers, which displayed peaks and valleys, while the other graph was a new visual tool they created: a smoothed graph that averages out fluctuations in data.  

When the blood pressure of the patient was under control but had a lot of fluctuation, the doctors were more likely to accurately assess the patient’s health using the new smoothed graph compared to the raw graph.

“Raw data can be visually noisy and hard to interpret because it is easy to get distracted by outliers in the data,” Shaffer said. “At the end of the day, patients and their doctors just want to know if blood pressure is under control, and this new smoothed graph can be an additional tool to make it easier and faster for busy doctors to accurately assess that.”

This proof-of-concept study is the foundation for Shaffer’s ongoing research with Richelle Koopman, a professor in the School of Medicine, which includes working with Vanderbilt University and Oregon Health & Science University to determine whether the new smoothed graph can one day be shown to patients taking their own blood pressure at home. The research team is working to get the technology integrated with HIPAA-compliant electronic health records that patients and their care team have access to.

This could alleviate pressure on the health care system by potentially reducing the need for in-person visits when blood pressure is under control, reducing the risk for false positives that may lead to over-treatment.

 “There are some people who are being over-treated with unnecessary blood pressure medication that can make them dizzy and lower their heart rate,” Shaffer said. “This is particularly risky for older adults who are more at risk for falling. Hopefully, this work can help identify those who are being over-treated.”

The findings were not particularly surprising to Shaffer.

“As a psychologist, I know that, as humans, we have these biases that underlie a lot of our judgments and decisions,” Shaffer said. “We tend to be visually drawn to extreme cases and perceive extreme cases as threats. It’s hard to ignore, whether you’re a patient or a provider. We are all humans.”

Given the increasing popularity of health informatics and smart wearable devices that track vital signs, the smoothed graphs could one day be applied to interpreting other health metrics.

“We have access to all this data now like never before, but how do we make use of it in a meaningful way, so we are not constantly overwhelming people?” Shaffer said. “With better visualisation tools, we can give people better context for their health information and help them take action when needed.”

Source: EurekAlert!