Day: June 17, 2026

Categories : Cardiovascular Disease ExerciseTags : Leave a comment

90-120 Weekly Minutes of Strength Training May Be Optimal for Lowering Death Risk

On By ModernMedia

Specifically tied to significantly lower risks of cardiovascular and neurological disease deaths
Effects amplified by aerobic exercise, but no further risk reduction above 120 minutes

Photo by John Arano on Unsplash

Clocking up 90 to 120 weekly minutes of strength (resistance) training may be the sweet spot for lowering the risk of death, suggests a 30 year study, published online in the British Journal of Sports Medicine.

The effects were amplified by the addition of aerobic exercise, but no further benefit was apparent above 120 minutes a week of strength training – an amount that was specifically associated with, respectively, 19% and 27% lower risks of dying from cardiovascular and neurological diseases.

The benefits of aerobic physical activity on lowering the risk of death are well known, but less clear is the role of muscle strengthening exercise in reducing the risks of death from all and specific causes, solely or jointly with aerobic exercise, say the researchers.

To explore this further, they drew on 30 years of monitoring data from 3 large groups of study participants: the Health Professionals Follow-up Study, 1992–2022; the Nurses’ Health Study, 2002–21; and  the Nurses’ Health Study II, 2003–21, comprising a total of 147,374 participants (31,540 men and 115,834 women).

Participants were quizzed every 2 years on the amount of time they spent on strength training and aerobic exercise every week for up to 30 years. Aerobic exercise included brisk walking, running, jogging, swimming, cycling, tennis, squash, strenuous outdoor work and stair climbing, while strength training included exercises using weights or body weight, such as press ups, squats, and lunges.

The average age of participants at study entry was 54. Those who clocked up more strength training tended to be younger, weigh less, have a healthier lifestyle, and do more aerobic exercise than those who did no strength training.

Three quarters (74%) of participants did more than the recommended 150 minutes/week of moderate intensity aerobic exercise, measured as 7.5 MET hours over the long term. METs express the amount of calories expended per minute of physical activity, relative to calories expended at rest. And nearly half (46%) of participants did some strength training.

During the 30 year monitoring period, 35,798 study participants died. A higher weekly long term level of strength training was associated with a lower risk of death.

After adjusting for potentially influential factors, 90–119 minutes/week of strength training was associated with a 13% lower risk of death from any cause, with no further benefit observed above 120 minutes/week.

And 90-119 weekly minutes of strength training was specifically associated with a 19% lower risk of dying from cardiovascular disease, and a 27% lower risk of dying from neurological disease.

A reduced risk of cancer was seen only at lower levels: 1–29 mins/week (21% lower) and 30–59 mins/week (18% lower).

Compared with those participants with fewer than 7.5 MET hours/week of aerobic exercise and no strength training, those doing 1–59 and 60–119 mins/week of strength training alone had a 7–11% lower risk of death.

Aerobic activity alone at any level above 7.5 MET hours/week was associated with a 26–43% lower risk of death.

And the lowest risk was observed among those with both high aerobic activity and strength training levels every week: 45% lower risk for 30-44 MET hours/week of aerobic exercise plus 60–119 mins/week of strength training, and 53%-58% lower risks among those with 45+ MET hours/week of aerobic activity, irrespective of strength training level.

This is an observational study, and as such, no firm conclusions can be drawn about cause and effect. And the researchers acknowledge various limitations to their study.

These include the self reported nature of the data; the exclusion of strength training activities, such as calisthenics and Pilates; no information on the duration of each exercise session or the intensity of strength training, any or all of which might have influenced the findings.

Nevertheless they conclude: “Our findings on different dose-response relationships between long-term resistance training with all-cause and cause-specific mortality suggest that different amounts of resistance training may be needed to optimise benefits across outcomes.

“The observed pattern that adding resistance training further reduced mortality risk across all levels of aerobic activity up to 45 MET hours/week supports current recommendations encouraging both types of activity to maximise mortality benefits.”

Source: The BMJ Group

Categories : Cancer Lab Tests and ImagingTags : Leave a comment

Urine Test Could Help Detect Lung Cancer Years Before Symptoms Occur

On By ModernMedia
Urine samples. Credit: Cancer Research UK CC-BY4.0

Cambridge scientists hunting tell-tale killer ‘zombie’ cells that signal early lung cancer have developed a world-first urine test that could transform diagnosis and survival for thousands of patients.

[The test] could one day be used easily in GP surgeries and hospitals to help detect recurrence in this hard-to-treat cancer much earlier.

Ljiljana Fruk

As published this week in Nature Aging, the team has shown that this simple and affordable test could detect the earliest signs of lung cancer months, or even years, before symptoms appear, as well as monitor whether treatment is working and identify potential relapse.

 It works by identifying the presence of senescent cells in the lungs – so called ’zombie cells’ – that stop dividing but linger and release abnormal inflammatory signals that damage surrounding tissue and help create an environment that lowers the body’s ability to fight the cancer.

The study, funded by Cancer Research UK, marks a major leap towards more precise therapy and a test for early cancer and treatment efficiency that could be rolled out across the NHS one day.

Lung cancer is the UK’s most common cause of cancer death taking the lives of around 32,800 people every year. Thanks to huge strides in prevention, detection and treatment, in the UK, lung cancer has seen a 22% reduction in death rates in the last decade. And around two in three people (65%) with lung cancer in England survive their disease for five years or more when diagnosed at the earliest stage. But when diagnosed at the latest stage, this falls to 5 in 100 (5%).

This new test could save and improve thousands more lives in the future.  

The researchers created an injectable sensor that interacts with proteins released by senescent cells. When these proteins are present, the sensor triggers the release of a detectable compound that appears in urine – signalling the earliest biological signs of therapy resistance and lung cancer development.

The researchers say that early identification is critical to saving more lives, as the disease often relapses silently with few or no symptoms until it has already spread. By detecting signs of lung cancer development and therapy resistance early, their simple urine test can spot lung cancer and treatment resistance early, helping doctors to tailor and adapt the treatment to the patient and start that treatment earlier when it works best.

The team confirmed their results using real patient samples and large genetic datasets.

Professor Ljiljana Fruk, from the Department of Chemical Engineering and Biotechnology at Cambridge, said: “The sensor has not yet been tested in humans, next is the clinical trials and it is likely it will take few years to bring it to patients, but it is a first big step and it could one day used easily in GP surgeries and hospitals to help detect recurrence in this hard-to-treat cancer much earlier.”

Nearly half (46%) of lung cancers in England are diagnosed at the latest stage.

Professor Daniel Munoz-Espin from the Early Cancer Institute and co-lead for the Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre Thoracic Cancer Programme, said: “Our previous studies showed that senescent cells in response to chemotherapy can cause treatment resistance and an aggressive lung cancer relapse. We also found that senescent immune system cells promote lung cancer development by causing immunosuppression.

“Our urine nano sensor may allow primary care detection of therapy resistance and lung cancer early development in future clinical settings.”

Professor Robert Rintoul of the Department of Oncology, and co-lead for the Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre Thoracic Cancer Programme said: “Novel approaches for lung cancer detection and response to treatment are urgently needed to improve patient outcomes. This work forms the basis for testing within clinical trials with a view to future use in the clinic.”

Cancer Research UK’s spokesperson for the East of England, Patrick Keely, said: “With new technologies opening doors to new discoveries, we’re living in a golden age of research, which is powerfully underlined by this innovative new urine test to detect early lung cancer.” 

Adapted from a press release from Cancer Research UK

Reference

Hartono, M et al. Urinary detection of therapy-induced senescence and fibrosis using an injectable albumin-based nanoprobe. Nature Aging; 13 May 2026; DOI: s43587-026-01116-z

Republished from the University of Cambridge under a Creative Commons licence.

Read the original article.

Categories : Diet and Nutrition GastrointestinalTags : Leave a comment

Cutting Out Sucrose from the Diet May Disrupt Gut Microbiome

On By ModernMedia
Photo by Sharon Mccutcheon on Unsplash

Eliminating sugar from your diet may be more detrimental than previously thought, according to an animal study being presented Saturday at ENDO 2026, the Endocrine Society’s annual meeting in Chicago, Ill.

“Completely removing sucrose from a low-fat diet may unexpectedly disrupt gut health and promote inflammation and metabolic dysfunction, highlighting that balanced nutrition is more important than simply eliminating sugar,” said Rasheed Ahmad, PhD, principal scientist and head of the Immunology & Microbiology Department at the Dasman Diabetes Institute, in Kuwait City, Kuwait. The institute was founded by Kuwait Foundation for the Advancement of Sciences. Researchers investigated the effects of a sucrose-free low-fat diet compared to a sucrose-containing low-fat control diet in two groups of mice for 16 weeks. 

They evaluated glucose tolerance, insulin sensitivity, circulating metabolic hormones, the gut microbiome and inflammation in the colon and liver.

Mice fed the sucrose-free diet developed impaired glucose control, insulin resistance, gut microbial imbalance, intestinal inflammation and fatty liver changes, despite having no significant differences in body weight compared with control mice. 

“The findings suggest that complete removal of sucrose from a low-fat diet may negatively affect gut microbiota and metabolic health,” Ahmad said. “The study highlights the importance of maintaining balanced dietary carbohydrates to support gut and immune homeostasis.” 

Until now, the consequences of restrictive diets that eliminate sugar from a low-fat diet were unknown.

“This research may influence future dietary recommendations by emphasizing the importance of maintaining a healthy gut microbiome rather than focusing only on sugar restriction,” Ahmad said. “In the long term, these findings could help improve strategies for preventing and managing metabolic disorders, fatty liver disease and chronic inflammatory conditions.”

“Studies such as this reflect our institute’s commitment to advancing evidence-based scientific discoveries that improve public health outcomes and deepen our understanding of metabolic disease,” said Faisal Hamed Al-Refaei, MD, Acting Director General of Dasman Diabetes Institute.

Source: Endocrine Society

Categories : General InterestTags : Leave a comment

Strength Looks Like Care: The Male Nurse Redefining South African Fatherhood

On By ModernMedia

For Bafana Manyisa, strength doesn’t look the way most men are taught it should. It’s not toughness or stoicism or an unshakeable composure. Strength, he says, looks like sitting with a patient who needs reassurance. It looks like supporting a new overwhelmed father navigating the parenting journey for the first time. It looks like simply being present for your family when they need you most.

As a registered nurse, Operational and Outreach Team Leader at Dis-Chem and Dis-Chem Baby City Clinics, husband and father, Manyisa has spent his career learning what few South African men are encouraged to admit: that care is one of the most demanding forms of strength there is.

From mechanics to healthcare

Raised in Mohlakeng on Johannesburg’s West Rand, Manyisa’s path to nursing was unconventional. His childhood dream was mechanical engineering. He spent his early years studying motor mechanics, working in workshops, enjoying the technical precision of the work. But something was missing.

“I realised that what fulfilled me most was helping people,” he explains.

It took his older sister, a primary healthcare nurse practitioner to recognise what he didn’t yet see in himself,  a natural capacity for compassion. She urged him to apply for the R425 nursing programme. “From the moment I started training, everything aligned,” he says. “I fell in love with nursing because it gave me the opportunity to make a real difference in people’s lives, especially during their most vulnerable moments.”

The values that shaped his approach to healthcare were rooted long before he entered any clinical setting. Growing up in Mohlakeng taught him resilience, humility, and the importance of community lessons he says no textbook could replicate. “Our community taught us to look out for one another,” he reflects. “Simple acts of kindness, respect for elders, and serving others became part of who I am.”

The weight of witnessing

Those values were tested most severely during his time at Eyethu Yarona Clinic under the Gauteng Department of Health. Faced with water shortages, electricity interruptions and stock limitations, the clinic ran on compassion and improvisation. It was difficult work in difficult conditions, yet it was there that Manyisa experienced one of the defining moments of his career.

After helping an elderly patient collect her chronic medication, she paused and told him something that has stayed with him ever since: “You make a difference in our lives. You don’t just give us medication, you treat us with care.”

That moment crystallised his understanding of nursing and later, fatherhood. “It’s not about treatment alone,” says the father of one. “It’s about dignity, empathy, and human connection.”

A different kind of strength

Working in healthcare has given Manyisa an intimate view of the pressures South African men carry in silence. Financial stress. The relentless expectation to provide. The demand to always appear strong. He sees men shoulder these burdens alone, asking for nothing, showing nothing.

His message to them is direct: asking for help is not weakness. Vulnerability is not failure.

“Too many men believe they have to carry everything on their own,” he says. “Real strength comes from being honest, seeking support when you need it, and taking care of yourself so that you can take care of those who depend on you.”

The qualities that make a good healthcare professional – empathy, resilience, patience, and care are, he believes, the very same qualities that make a good father. This Father’s Day, he’s actively encouraging more men to recognise this, to become more involved in their families’ health and wellbeing. To support partners during pregnancy. To take an active role in their children’s healthcare journeys. To show up.

The strongest thing

“People may forget what you said or what you did,” Bafana reflects. “But they never forget how you made them feel. Nursing teaches you resilience and compassion in ways no salary ever could.”

His story challenges a narrow version of masculinity that has done South African men no favours. Men can be leaders and caregivers. They can be strong and compassionate. They can provide and nurture.

Perhaps, he suggests, the strongest thing a man can do is simply care.

Categories : Expert Opinion IT in HealthcareTags : Leave a comment

Opinion Piece: Healthtech is Only as Strong as the Hands that Shape It

On By ModernMedia

By Vishal Barapatre, Group Chief Technology Officer at In2IT Technologies

| 17 June 2026

Healthcare is investing heavily in technology, but outcomes do not always improve at the same rate or deliver the desired effect. The issue is rarely a lack of tools. More often, it comes down to the way those tools are designed, connected, and maintained. Health technology, often referred to as Healthtech, delivers real value not just when systems exist, but also when expert IT partners shape them to turn health data into meaningful, useful intelligence throughout the entire care journey.

In many healthcare environments, technology has accelerated rapidly over the past decade. Hospitals and clinics have introduced electronic medical records, diagnostic platforms, and telehealth systems, with enormous potential, the benefits are often uneven when systems operate in isolation or fail to align with the realities of clinical workflows. The difference between technology investment and measurable clinical improvement often lies in the design and integration that happens behind the scenes.

The promise of healthtech lives in the data

At its core, healthtech is about data. This includes how data is captured, stored, presented, and analysed to support better patient care. Every interaction between a patient and the healthcare system generates information that can guide more informed decisions. From recognising early signals for preventive care, tracking progress during rehabilitation, to ensuring complete and accurate information during operative procedures, effective use of data underpins every stage of the healthcare journey.

Yet data alone is not enough. Without systems designed to bring clarity to complexity, information becomes fragmented, inconsistent, and largely underused. This is where expert IT partners are essential. They do not just implement platforms; they create the right conditions for data to support better patient care.

Another challenge lies in the diversity of healthcare data sources. Clinical records, laboratory results, imaging systems, wearable devices, and patient engagement platforms, all generate valuable information. However, without thoughtful integration and governance, these data streams can quickly become disconnected. When aligned, they allow clinicians to see a more complete picture of a patient’s health, enabling earlier intervention and more personalised treatment decisions.

Intuition does not happen by accident

There is a growing expectation that healthtech should feel intuitive, where insights emerge naturally without creating additional friction in already demanding clinical environments. However, intuitive technology does not happen by chance. It results from thoughtful choices about structure, integration, and user experience.

What needs to be understood is that a system’s value is not determined by its technical features but by how well it fits into clinical workflows. The data must be available at the right time, in the right context, and in a way that supports judgment instead of overwhelming it. Without this insight and expertise, even the most advanced systems may become obstacles instead of assets.

This is particularly important in high-pressure healthcare environments where time is limited, and decisions are critical. If systems require excessive navigation, duplicate data entry, or complicated interfaces, clinicians may spend more time interacting with technology than with the patients. Well-designed systems quietly support decision-making rather than compete for attention, ensuring that technology strengthens clinical practice of disrupting it.

Continuity of care requires continuity of systems

To add, preventive, rehabilitative, and operative care are often treated as separate areas, yet they are part of a single patient journey. The true value of healthtech emerges when data flows smoothly across these stages, creating continuity instead of hand-offs.

This continuity does not happen on its own. It relies on systems that preserve data integrity over time, integrate seamlessly across different care settings, and evolve as patient needs evolve. Without it, technology investments risk becoming isolated solutions rather than truly transformative tools.

When healthcare providers can access consistent patient information across departments and care phases, they gain a more holistic understanding of health outcomes. This continuity helps reduce redundant tests, prevent information gaps, and support coordinated treatment plans. Over time, it contributes to a healthcare environment where patients’ experiences feel more connected and less fragmented.

Trust is built behind the scenes

To truly be transformative, healthcare must rely on trust between patients and clinicians, as well as between clinicians and the systems they depend on. Yet, this trust is fragile, as a single system failure, data inconsistency, or security issue can erode confidence across a healthcare facility.

Trust is built on reliability, resilience, and strong governance. Systems must perform well under pressure, safeguard sensitive information, and evolve safely over time. Although this foundation work often goes unnoticed, its impact is felt every time clinicians use technology with confidence and ease.

The growing digitisation of healthcare has also made cybersecurity and data protection essential pillars of trust. Healthcare data is among the most sensitive information an organisation can manage. Protecting it requires robust security architecture, continuous monitoring, and governance practices that evolve as threats emerge. When these safeguards are embedded into the system architecture, healthcare organisations can innovate confidently without compromising patient privacy.

The real differentiator is partnership, not platforms

As healthtech continues to evolve, access to tools will be less of a significant differentiator. What will matter more is how those tools are shaped, connected, and sustained. Technology alone cannot provide better care. It requires partners who understand both the technical and human aspects of healthcare.

This is where an IT partner can navigate and guide healthcare organisations through complexity, turning possibilities into practice and ambitions into results. Their role is not just supportive but foundational in demonstrating the true value of healthtech. The future of healthcare will belong not to those who adopt the most technology, but to those who build it wisely.