Tag: operating room

Scheduling Surgeons: Researchers Identify Factors for Hospital Efficiency

Booking operating rooms with surgical precision starts with more accurate predictions of how surgeons spend their time

Photo by Piron Guillaume on Unsplash

Researchers at the University of Massachusetts Amherst have analysed nearly 86 500 surgeries at Baystate Medical Center to identify the top factors that influence inefficiencies in surgeon schedules. Having an efficiently organised surgical schedule has the potential to lower costs and reduce surgeon burnout, which would also improve patient outcomes.

As shortfalls in the availability of surgeons grow, the ability to meet surgical demands will only worsen, with implications for both healthcare delivery and costs.

This illustrates the timeline of two surgeries performed by the same surgeon. The blue area represents the duration of the actual surgery itself, while the white blocks represent pre- and post-surgery activity.  Surgeon gap time is the time interval between two operations where the surgeon is not actively working.

“The most expensive part in this process of getting a surgery is the surgeon,” says Muge Capan, assistant professor in the Riccio College of Engineering at UMass Amherst and an author of the new paper published in the Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. “Surgeons are highly skilled and they perform high-risk tasks. When we think about utilising a resource, we don’t want them to sit idle – but we also don’t want to overutilise them because these are not machines, these are people. Finding that right balance is a challenging problem.”

However, to efficiently schedule, hospitals need to predict how long a procedure will take. This includes the surgery itself as well as many other factors that surround an operation – has the surgeon recovered from their previous operation? Is the room clean? Is the proper equipment in place? “There is a lot of uncertainty there at the system level,” says Capan.

Currently, surgeries are scheduled in blocks, which is not compatible with the unpredictable nature of a hospital. “If you’re scheduling tennis lessons, it works because a tennis lesson is exactly one hour,” says Capan. “You block the court for one hour, you play, you leave, next group. But blocks don’t make sense for surgeries, because they’re so uncertain.” As a result, operating rooms (ORs) can sit empty since any block of time less than two-and-a-half hours is unusable for most surgeries.

In the pursuit of engineering a better schedule, Capan and her team collaborated with surgeons to predict their schedule by focusing on the person, not the operating room.

Surgeons are highly skilled and they perform high-risk tasks… we don’t want them to sit idle – but we also don’t want to overutilise them because these are not machines, these are people. Finding that right balance is a challenging problem.

Muge Capan, assistant professor in the Riccio College of Engineering at UMass Amherst

“There’s so much research on the operating room itself – what happens between the time a patient leaves the OR to the time the next patient enters the OR,” says Jonathan Akhagbosu, first author on the paper and UMass Amherst industrial engineering Ph.D. candidate. “But we wanted to look at it from a surgeon’s point of view: What happens between when a surgeon finishes one case and proceeds to the next case?”

The researchers named this time between operations “gap time.” In their study, they used machine learning to analyse three years of medical records from Baystate Medical Center in Springfield to determine the characteristics of a surgery that can predict these gaps in a surgeon’s schedule. 

A selection of the top factors associated with larger gap times are: if the surgeon’s previous or following case is an emergency, the preceding surgery is related to the chest (thorax), the following procedure is on the heart, or the surgery is highly demanding. 

Also, the last factor on the list – the assessment of how taxing an operation is on the surgeon – the researchers used mathematical models to create a new measurement called surgical case demand. Cases fall into one of three tiers. Type 1 consists of short, scheduled procedures of low-severity illness and elective surgeries, such as the removal of fatty lumps from the skin (lipoma excision) or simple dental rehabilitation. Type 2 events are more demanding, such as a mastectomy or knee replacement. And type 3 surgeries are the most onerous: the condition is more severe and they happen during off-hour times. Examples include emergency brain or abdominal operations and spine procedures.

It’s also worth noting that eye (ophthalmology) and orthopedic surgeries were associated with shorter gap times.

Capan envisions that predicting schedules can help recapture some of this lost time. “If there’s going be a gap, let’s figure out if that gap is long enough that I could squeeze in something else,” says Capan. “This is called ‘collectible time’ in the literature. Collectible time means it’s a useful gap. So what we learned about gap time could potentially help us understand collectible time.”

By Julia Westbrook 

Source: University of Massachusetts

Operating Room Availability Planning Helped Cushion Staff Shortages

Photo by Jafar Ahmed on Unsplash

Decreasing operating room (OR) availability by 15% helped a hospital address a 30% staff shortage caused by the COVID pandemic, while surgeons were largely satisfied with the arrangements, according to a study by UPMC Presbyterian Hospital.

“The Great Resignation has disproportionately impacted health care to near-crisis levels and we were able to address ongoing staff shortages by methodically decreasing available surgical times,” said Dr Kimberly Cantees, clinical director of anaesthesiology and perioperative services at UPMC Presbyterian Hospital. “By using a phased approach, including daily meetings to address scheduling issues, we were able to prioritise essential surgeries and care for patients with the greatest need.”

UPMC is a comprehensive quaternary care regional and national referral centre for many surgical specialties. The hospital implemented a five-phased approach for the study, which started in May 2021, to ensure that it could maintain provision of essential surgical care when its surgical technologist and OR nurse vacancy rate reached 30%. The phases went as follows:

  • Phase I (May 2021): Restricted OR availability for surgeries that were less time- sensitive and moved some to other hospitals and surgery centers in the UPMC system; decreased OR availability for surgeons with highly elective cases (eg, sports orthopedic procedures, select hand surgery cases, some plastic surgery) and moved a small amount of surgical work to the bedside in the intensive care unit.
  • Phase II (July 2021): Formed a multidisciplinary surgical services capacity committee that met daily to ensure the staffing matched the surgical schedule for the subsequent two weeks. Values for surgical care were identified and cases such as transplant and cancer surgeries were prioritised.
  • Phase III (Oct. 2021): Reduced OR time availability by 15% when surgeries could be scheduled and extended the deadline for standard scheduling guidelines from three days to five days before surgery.
  • Phase IV (Nov. 2021): Instituted additional reduction of OR scheduling to meet continued staff shortages and reduced available OR time for all surgical services by an additional 10%. Surgeons with two ORs had their time reduced for all services, except for the care of trauma patients.
  • Phase V (Jan. 2022): Implemented UPMC system-wide review of surgical case prioritisation and opened more ORs for booking, which allowed greater flexibility for performing surgeries depending on staffing availability.

Over the course of the phased approach, the available ORs were decreased from 36 to 31 (15%). This has been adequate to address the 30% reduction in surgical services staff, Dr Cantees explained. The approach also helped the hospital to cope with staffing shortages during the Omicron surge.

Dr Cantees said there was minimal pushback from surgeons to the phased approach, mostly thanks to clear communication of both the staffing hurdles, as well as established surgical priorities. Communication occurs between members of the multidisciplinary surgical services capacity committee and individual surgeons.

The study was presented at the American Society of Anesthesiologists’ ADVANCE 2022, the Anesthesiology Business Event.

Source: EurekAlert!