Categories : Diseases, Syndromes and Conditions PoliticsTags :

Rare Diseases in South Africa: A Neglected Topic

On By ModernMedia
Source: Pixabay/CC0

An article in Spotlight examines the challenges faced by South Africans with rare diseases.

A rare disease is a health condition affecting a small number of people compared with other diseases commonly identified in the population. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), there are between 5000 and 8000 known rare diseases worldwide, affecting an estimated 400 million people.

According to the advocacy group Rare Disease South Africa (RDSA), about 3.6 million people in SA have a rare disease. In South Africa, the ability to diagnose a rare disease is hindered by a lack of capacity and resources, according to research, putting the time to diagnosis for rare diseases in general higher than the estimated 5.5 to 7.5 years in high-income countries.
“There is still low recognition of genetic disorders among specialists. And when they are recognised, testing remains expensive and requires sophisticated levels of training which are relatively limited,” says Prof Karen Fieggen, a medical geneticist at the University of Cape Town (UCT).

According to her, costs, skills, training, and human resource factors are all barriers to effective testing and diagnosis. But she says the rationale to build an effective system is solid.

“We have capable people and expertise to build this system, but until you invest in it, it won’t be big enough to be self-sustaining,” she says.

Prof Fieggen acknowledges that resources are stretched in the public sector, where specialists who carry out genetic testing for rare diseases must meet the needs of a larger part of the population. However, she notes, “there’s no guarantee you’re better off in the private sector”.

“There are very few genetic referral options, and none of the medical geneticists are kept in work full time,” she says. In Cape Town, for example, she says that all patients seeking genetic testing had to come to the private sector until recently. “We have the capacity to train seven specialists a year, but posts aren’t available for them to take,” she says.

At one per 4.5 million population, available medical geneticists in the public healthcare sector fall far short of the 21 per 2 million recommended by the WHO. These services are also spread unevenly through the country. The country’s heavy burden of HIV and TB is partly responsible for this lack of coverage.

While healthcare training must focus on these public health needs, Prof Fieggen says rare diseases need a sensible approach. “It doesn’t help to throw huge resources at something that will have minimal management impact,” she says. “But the way in which rare diseases have been relatively ignored isn’t constructive.”

Helping the recognition of rare diseases and referral pathways in physician training may make a difference. “One thing that could be instilled in training is to recognise that if things are atypical in their presentation, there should be a discussion with a referral centre,” says Associate Professor Ian Ross, a senior consultant endocrinologist at UCT and Groote Schuur Hospital.

Only 2.5-5% of rare diseases have approved treatments, some of which are prohibitively expensive.

The most expensive drug in the world is Zolgensma (generic name onasemnogene abeparvovec), a once-off treatment costing a mind-blowing USD $2.1 million (R 30m). Used to treat inherited spinal muscular atrophy, where infants with the condition are unlikely to see their second birthday. However, even this is available through the UK’s National Health Service, which struck a deal to bring prices down.

Du Plessis says these drugs are not on the essential medicines list because of the small group of patients they would serve. “The essential medicines list is dedicated to treatments that are procured in large numbers. Rare diseases will never be mass-market drugs.”

Such drugs can be purchased by hospital pharmacists so they can be available at a certain hospital, making for a haphazard situation.
To help address this inequality, RDSA held a Rare Disease Symposium on 25 August, inviting feedback on a draft policy framework from various medical sector and political stakeholders.

The framework has a definition for rare disease in SA, namely a condition affecting one in 2000 people or fewer. It also recommends including rare diseases in the NHI benefit package. The NHI bill also includes a Benefits Advisory Committee, which will determine what diseases get coverage,

However, Dr Nicolas Crisp, Acting Director General for Health, said that the NHI would not ring-fence funding. As medical insurance will be done away with, it will be crucial to secure funding for those extremely expensive drugs unaffordable to the private sector.

Source: Spotlight

Categories : Gender PaediatricsTags :

Study Highlights Role of Sex Hormones in Behavioural Development

On By ModernMedia
Photo by Ben Wicks on Unsplash

A new study shows that sex hormones are important for developing gender role behaviours in boys, such as active play.

In laboratory animals, sex differences in behaviour arise from different hormone levels produced by males and females influence patterns of gene expression in the developing brain. However, the origins of sex differences in human behaviour are not as well understood.

“In the lab, you can do experiments on how these hormones affect animal brains and perform other experimental manipulations. We can’t do those things to people, so we looked to a natural experiment,” explained study leader David Puts, associate professor of anthropology.

Prof Puts and his collaborators made use of a natural experiment called isolated GnRH deficiency (IGD), a rare endocrine disorder. Individuals with IGD lack sex hormones from the second trimester of development right through until they begin hormone replacement therapy to induce puberty. However, as the external genitals develop earlier, during the first trimester, people with IGD are clearly male or female at birth, and are raised according to their sex. 

IGD therefore presents the chance to study the behaviour of those raised as boys but exposed to low testicular hormones, or raised as girls but exposed to low ovarian hormones.

The researchers compared 97 individuals with IGD (a small number due to its rarity) to 1665 individuals with typical hormonal development. Differences in behaviour were investigated; boys being encouraged toward active play, girls pushed to more passive pursuits. The researchers asked subjects to recall behaviours they had as children.

“We asked them, ‘When you read a book, were you the male or female in the story?’, ‘Where your friends boys or girls?’, ‘Did you play with dolls or trucks?’,” said Talia N Shirazi, doctoral recipient in anthropology now working in the reproductive health industry.

These childhood gender role behaviours are among the largest differences in behaviour between sexes, Prof Puts said. Typically, males will say they were the male character, played with other boys and preferred trucks, while females will say they were the female character, played with other girls and preferred dolls.

However, males with IGD reported more gender non-conforming in this regard. The researchers found in that men with IGD recalled a higher level of childhood gender non-conformity than typical men, while women with IGD did not differ from typical women in childhood gender conformity.

‘”We don’t see this effect in the women with IGD,” said Shirazi, indicating that low levels of ovarian hormones does not significantly impact childhood gender role behaviours.

“Our results suggest that in humans, androgens, such as testosterone produced by the testes, influence male brain development directly as they do in other mammals, rather than only indirectly by influencing external appearance and consequently gender socialisation,” said Prof Puts. “Both the direct influence of androgens on the developing brain and gender socialisation probably play important roles in producing sex differences in childhood behaviour.”

Prof Puts and Shirazi agree that despite their modest sample of participants with IGD, they are encouraged that the results were very similar in subjects who came from a clinical setting and those recruited from support groups.

“It would be nice to be able to identify people with IGD when they are younger, before they reach what should be puberty,” said Shirazi. “We need to focus on recruitment for our studies because there is a lot that can be learned about the cause of gender behaviours.”

Source: Penn State

Categories : CancerTags :

Common Chemical in Medical Products Linked to Breast Cancer

On By ModernMedia
Photo by Bill Oxford on Unsplash

Researchers in Japan have found that widely used chemicals called photoinitiators cause breast tumours to accelerate in mice. 

Photoinitiators, which release reactive molecules in response to UV radiation,  are used in a wide range of products, including plastics, paints, inks, and adhesives. Photoinitiators are present in common objects as well as in medical products and instruments such as dental fillers and containers.

Recent studies have demonstrated several health hazards associated with photoinitiators, raising safety concerns. In particular, the presence of these compounds in clinical instruments, routinely used for treating high-risk individuals such as cancer patients, has become a major cause for concern. Previous research has shown that three photoinitiators commonly found in plastics and paints 1-HCHPK, MBB, and MTMP show oestrogen-like effects on cultured breast cancer cells, increasing their proliferation. Found in marketed injection solutions, the clear link between oestrogen activity and breast cancer made determining their effect a priority.

In a study published in Current Research in Toxicology, lead researcher Dr Yoichi Kawasaki and Prof Toshiaki Sendo from Okayama University examined how exposure to 1-HCHPK, MBB, and MTMP affected the growth of transplanted breast cancer tumours in mice. They found that all three compounds caused a faster increase in the growth of breast tumors, within 13 weeks of treatment. “This study extends our previous findings and shows that in addition to promoting the proliferation of breast cancer cells in culture, these photoinitiators also increase the growth of breast tumours in live animals. This implies that they could also potentially hasten disease progression in breast cancer patients,” explained Dr Kawasaki.    

The study results show that 1-HCHPK, MBB, and MTMP have oestrogen-like activity and could thus act as hormonal disruptions. Given oestrogen’s role in regulating reproductive function in both men and women, such disruptions could affect not only patients with breast cancer, but also healthy individuals. While the researchers intend to explore the effects of photoinitiators on reproduction in future research, the present study informs breast cancer management, as well as making urgent call-to-action to eliminate toxic materials from medical equipment.

“Photoinitiators have helped us improve the quality of several commonly used products. But it is time we reconsider whether their benefits outweigh their risks, and our findings are an important milestone in encouraging this conversation. We hope that it will prompt more intensive research and stricter regulations on what materials can be adopted for commonly used products, especially those with medical applications,” said Dr Kawasaki.

Source: EurekAlert!

Categories : Medical Research & TechnologyTags :

New Effort to Improve Diversity in Clinical Trials

On By ModernMedia
Source: CC0 Creative Commons

Columbia University and Pfizer Inc. have established the Columbia-Pfizer Clinical Trials Diversity Initiative, which aims to reduce health disparities by increasing the number of minorities in clinical trials and making clinical researchers more diverse.

In the United States, 12% of the population is Black and 18% is Hispanic or Latino but in 2020, only 8% were Black and 11% were Hispanic among the 32 000 patients who participated in clinical trials that led to FDA approval of new drugs. For example, a review of clinical trials between 1999 and 2015 for cystic fibrosis only had a representation of 2.0% for Latinos, 1.0% for Black individuals, and 0.1% for Asians.

“People of different ethnicities can have different responses to the same medicine or treatment, so a lack of diversity among clinical trial participants means doctors cannot know if the treatment will be effective in all the patients they treat,” said Anil K Rustgi, MD, Interim Executive Vice President and Dean of the Faculties of Health Sciences and Medicine at Columbia University and director of the Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center. “Increasing diversity in trials will improve the treatment of patients from underrepresented groups and is a moral imperative as well as a fundamental medical issue.”

Rod MacKenzie, PhD, Executive Vice President and Chief Development Officer at Pfizer, said, “Diversity of representation in clinical trials is a matter of equity, which is a core Pfizer value. We are deeply committed to ensuring our clinical trials reflect the diversity of the communities like New York in which they are conducted. We look forward to working with Columbia University both to offer any willing individual, regardless of background, the opportunity to participate in and contribute to clinical research, and to expand the roster of diverse clinical researchers who are helping us conduct studies.”

Pfizer will provide a three-year, $10 million grant to Columbia to help establish and expand the Initiative, which will improve the diversity of participants in clinical trials by looking at the barriers that prevent participation by marginalised individuals. The Initiative will expand Columbia’s Community Health Workers Program network to connect with underserved populations and create culturally sensitive engagement tools. The efforts will include researching new ways to increase the accessibility of clinical trials through telemedicine, wearable technology, and home visits.

The Initiative also aims to improve diversity among clinical research faculty and staff. Columbia will help build an additional pipeline of diverse clinical investigators through a new National Diversity Clinical Trials Leadership Program to increase the number of faculty and staff from underrepresented groups as well.

“A diverse research staff not only helps to improve trust in clinical trials among participants from underserved groups but improves the entire clinical trial enterprise by bringing different questions, experience, and perspective to the table,” Dr Rustgi said.

Source: Columbia University Irving Medical Center

Categories : PaediatricsTags :

Glasses Boosts Academic Performance for Students Who Need Them

On By ModernMedia
Photo by CDC on Unsplash

Students receiving eyeglasses through a school-based initiative scored higher on reading and math tests, found in the largest clinical study of the impact of glasses on education ever conducted in the US. Students struggling the most academically showed the greatest improvement.

The study by Johns Hopkins researchers from the Wilmer Eye Institute and School of Education is published in JAMA Ophthalmology.

“We rigorously demonstrated that giving kids the glasses they need helps them succeed in school,” said senior author Megan Collins, a paediatric ophthalmologist at the Wilmer Eye Institute. “This collaborative project with Johns Hopkins, Baltimore City and its partners has major implications for advancing health and educational equity all across the country.”

The team studied students who received eye examinations and glasses through the Vision for Baltimore program. The effort was launched in 2016 after an acute need for vision care among the city’s public school students was identified: as many as 15 000 of the city’s 60 000 pre-K (age 2 to 4) through 8th-grade (age 13 to 14) students likely needed glasses though many were unaware or were unable to get them.

Over five years, Vision for Baltimore has tested the vision of more than 64 000 students and distributed more than 8000 pairs of glasses. The Johns Hopkins study represents the most robust work thus far evaluating whether having glasses affects a child’s performance in school.

The three-year randomised clinical trial, conducted from 2016 to 2019, analysed the performance of 2304 students in grades 3 to 7 who received screenings, eye examinations and eyeglasses from Vision for Baltimore. The team looked at their scores on standardised reading and math tests, measuring both 1-year and 2-year impact.

After one year, reading scores increased significantly for students who got glasses, compared to those getting glasses later. There was also significant improvement in maths for students in primary grades.

There were particularly striking improvements for girls, special education students, and students who had been among the lowest performing.

Megan Collins, senior author said, “The glasses offered the biggest benefit to the very kids who needed it the most – the ones who were really struggling in school.”

The gains were about the same as two to four months of extra education compared to students with glasses, said lead author Amanda J Neitzel, deputy director of evidence research at the Johns Hopkins Center for Research and Reform in Education. For students performing in the lowest quartile and students in special education, wearing glasses equated to four to six months of additional learning.

“This is how you close gaps,” Neitzel said.

However, the academic improvements seen after one year were not sustained over two years. Researchers suspect this could be a result of students starting to wear their glasses less, perhaps from loss or breakage.

To keep up the academic achievement boost, the researchers recommend that school-based vision initiatives should also try to ensure children are wearing the glasses and to replace them if needed.

Source: Johns Hopkins University

Categories : Cancer Ethics and LawTags :

Many Lung Cancer Patients Choose Euthanasia Without Exploring Treatment

On By ModernMedia
Photo by Adam Birkett on Unsplash

A Canadian study of lung cancer patients who opted for “medical assistance in dying” often proceeded without consultation with their radiation oncologist or medical oncologist.

In a Canadian study of 45 individuals diagnosed with lung cancer who used medical assistance in dying (also known as physician-assisted suicide), about 20% did not have a radiation oncologist involved when making the decision and 22% did not have a consultation with a medical oncologist, said Sara Moore, MD, of Ottawa Hospital Research Institute of the University of Ottawa.

Since 2016, about 60% of those seeking to end their life through legal means introduced in Canada had been diagnosed with cancer, Dr Moore explained in a presentation at the virtual World Conference on Lung Cancer.

Driven by loss of autonomy, control and dignity
The designated discussant, Monica Malec, MD, a geriatric and palliative care physician at the University of Chicago, said this was the first study to evaluate medical assistance in dying in patients with lung cancer, oncologists’ involvement, and treatment history.

“The demand for medical assistance in dying is increasing and is becoming more readily available to patients,” Dr Malec said. “Patients are seeking this option despite the availability of more effective and more tolerable treatment options. Existing literature suggests that loss of autonomy, control, and dignity are the primary drivers for seeking medical assistance in dying rather than uncontrolled symptoms, and the decision to pursue medical assistance in dying may occur pre-illness.”

Moore noted that while lung cancer accounts for 20%-25% of all cancer deaths overall, in the current study 17.5% of the patients had lung cancer diagnoses. “Lung cancer comprises slightly fewer medical assistance in dying cases than expected compared to lung cancer death rates,” she said.

Improved treatments disregarded
“Biomarker-driven targeted therapy and immunotherapy offer effective and tolerable new treatments, but a subset of patients undergo medical assistance in dying without accessing — or, in some cases, without being assessed for — these treatment options,” Dr Moore continued. “Most patients were assessed by an oncology specialist, though less than half received systemic therapy.”

“Given the growing number of efficacious and well-tolerated treatment options in lung cancer, consultation with an oncologist may be reasonable to consider for all patients with lung cancer who request medical assistance in dying,” she said.

The researchers screened data from the Ottawa region, and identified 256 patients with a cancer diagnosis who had used medical assistance in dying. Of these, 45 patients had a lung cancer diagnosis.About 85% had a history of tobacco smoking, and 36% were current smokers at the time they sought medical assistance in dying, Moore reported. Thirteen of these patients had no biopsy confirmation of their disease, but almost all (91%) opting for medical assistance in dying were diagnosed with metastatic disease. Average age was 72 years, and 64% (29 of 45 patients) were women, even though men are more often diagnosed with lung cancer, Dr Moore noted. 
Limitations included being limited to only a single region, and a lack of information on patients’ decision-making process.

Source: MedPage Today

Categories : New Compounds and Treatments Pain ManagementTags :

Breakthrough Could Lead to New Opioid Alternatives

On By ModernMedia
Source: NCI on Unsplash

Monash University researchers have made a breakthrough discovery that might lead to new non-opioid analgesics to treat neuropathic pain safely and effectively, without the risk of opioid addictions.

Neuropathic pain occurs when nerves are damaged or dysfunctional, and can be caused by injury, virus infection or cancer treatment, or it can be a symptom or complication of conditions such as multiple sclerosis and diabetes.

The new study, published in Nature, has shown a new mode of targeting the adenosine A1 receptor protein, which had long been a promising therapeutic target for non-opioid painkillers to treat neuropathic pain. However, development of analgesics using it had failed due to a lack of sufficient on-target selectivity, as well as undesirable adverse effects.

In the study, Monash researchers used electrophysiology and preclinical pain models to show that a particular class of molecule, called a ‘positive allosteric modulator’ (PAM), can enhance the targeting of the A1 receptor by binding to a different region of the protein.

Another breakthrough in the study was observing the high-resolution structure of the A1 receptor bound to both its natural activator, adenosine, and an analgesic PAM, which was facilitated by the application of cryo electron microscopy (cryoEM), providing the first atomic level snapshot of the drug binding location.

Chronic pain remains a widespread global health burden. A lack of treatment options has led to over-reliance on opioid painkillers, which provide only limited relief in patients with chronic (particularly neuropathic) pain, while having severe adverse effects, such as respiratory depression and addiction. In 2016, 42 000 deaths related to opioid misuse were recorded in the US, while 25 million Americans suffer from chronic pain.

This new discovery opens the door to the development of non-opioid drugs that lack such side effects.

Co-corresponding author of the study and Dean of the Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Professor Arthur Christopoulos said: “The world is in the grip of a global opioid crisis and there is an urgent need for non-opioid drugs that are both safe and effective.”

Source: Monash University

Categories : COVIDTags :

Platelet Signalling Implicated in COVID Organ Damage

On By ModernMedia
Source: Fusion Medical Animation on Unsplash

New research finds that one cause of organ damage in COVID patients is abnormal crosstalk between blood platelets and cells lining blood vessels.

The study published in Science Advances, revealed the protein signals released by platelets cause inflammation, abnormal clotting, and damage to vessels when exposed to SARS-CoV-2.

The work identified two related genes, S1000A8 and S1000A9, which are turned up in the platelets of COVID patients, causing them to make more of myeloid-related proteins (MRP) 8 and 14. Higher levels of the dual proteins were linked in the study to higher levels of clotting and inflammation in vessels and worse outcomes.

In support of the theory that platelets are at the core of blood vessel damage in COVID, the research team also presented evidence that approved medications known to block platelet activation via the platelet surface protein P2Y12 (clopidogrel or ticagrelor) reduced COVID-related inflammation in vessels. The study also found that COVID-exposed platelets change cells lining blood vessels (endothelial cells) largely through a protein called p-selectin, which makes platelets stickier and more likely to form clots.

“Our findings reveal a new role for platelets in COVID blood vessel damage, and may explain in large part what makes the COVID virus so much more deadly than its relatives that cause the common cold,” said corresponding author Tessa Barrett, PhD,.

Abnormal, body-wide inflammation and blood clotting were identified early in the pandemic as central features of severe COVID-19, with the two thought to be interrelated, say the study authors. As blood components that react to injuries in vessels by triggering inflammation, and by becoming sticky to clump together in clots, platelets are a possible culprit. Increasing evidence shows that interplay between platelets and endothelial cells may be important to these disease mechanisms.

For the current study, endothelial cells from small blood vessels were exposed to fluid released from the platelets of either COVID patients or healthy controls. RNA was then sequenced, In the presence of COVID-activated platelets, changes were observed in the activity of the exposed endothelial cells. Genes expressed differently in COVID-19 were linked to clotting, inflammation, and the weakening of junctions between endothelial cells, which lets blood serum seep into tissue to cause the pulmonary oedema seen in severe cases, where patients’ lungs fill with fluid.

The large list was narrowed down to S100A8 and S100A9, which coded for the building of MRP 8 and 14. COVID in patients was found to increase the amount of MRP8/14 produced by platelets and other cells by 166 percent compared to controls. Higher levels of these proteins were linked to abnormal thrombosis, inflammation, and critical illness among hospitalised COVID patients. Curiously S100A8/A9 were not upregulated after exposure of platelets to a coronavirus relative, CoV-OC43, which causes the common cold.

Additionally, damage and abnormal clotting could arise from p-selectin, which promotes platelet clumping and immune-boosting signals. The researchers also found that the anti-clotting P2Y12 inhibitors reduced the expression of S100A8 and S100A9 in platelets by 18 percent over four weeks, and in lab tests prevented COVID platelets from inducing blood vessel damage.

“The current study supports the theory that platelets are activating endothelial cells through P-selectin, and that both p-selectin and MRP8/14 contribute to vessel damage and an increased risk of dying,” said senior study author Jeffrey S. Berger, MD. “As our team also leads ACTIV4a, a large, ongoing NIH-funded, anti-clotting trial in COVID, we are currently testing in patients whether P2Y12 inhibitors can better prevent severe disease, with the results to be presented at the American Heart Association annual meeting in November.”

Source: NYU Langone Health

Categories : CancerTags :

Bone Marrow Cell Mutations That Protect Against Cancers

On By ModernMedia
Source: NIH

People with shortened telomeres caused by rare disorders may be more likely to have blood cancers such as leukaemia or myelodyplastic syndrome (MS). Now researchers have discovered several “self-correcting” genetic mutations in bone marrow that may protect such patients from these cancers.

In a study published in the Journal of Clinical Investigation, these mutations can serve as biomarkers to indicate if patients with short telomere syndromes (STS) are likely to develop blood cancers.

“These are the most common cancers we see in patients with short telomere syndromes,” said Mary Armanios, MD, director of the Telomere Center and professor of oncology at the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins. “We know that at a certain point, the cells of patients with shortened telomeres either become cancerous or stay healthy.”

Dr Armanios and her team suspected that a self-correcting mechanism in areas of the body with high cell turnover, such as bone marrow, was allowing normal cells to turn malignant. Instead, it appears this mechanism protects against cells from becoming cancerous.

As over 300 billion blood cells are produced in the bone marrow daily, the researchers suspected they could find evidence of cellular self-correction in this area of the body, especially amid the spongey interior of bones, where quick adaptation is crucial for high-volume cell production.
The researchers tested the bone marrow and blood cells of 84 study participants divided into three groups: Those with STS and MS or leukaemia; those with short telomere syndromes and no MS or leukemia; and those in the control group without short telomere syndromes or any cancers.

Using ultra-deep genetic sequencing which picks up hard-to-detect mutations, Armanios and her team observed genetic mutations and self-correction in several telomere-associated genes. Nearly a quarter of patients with STS had these mutations, some even showing multiple mutations.

One such mutation in a gene called TERT enables the production of crucial parts of telomerase, which stabilises telomeres. By boosting telomerase production and overwriting faulty copies of the TERT gene, the researchers found that bone marrow cells seemed to self-correct to avoid becoming cancerous.

“Our findings speak to the versatility of the bone marrow and other areas with high cell turnover in the body,” says Armanios. “Such advantageous mutations provide the body with a better chance to protect itself. These findings may be important in the screening process of shortened telomere patients so that we can predict who may be protected from cancer.”

Source: John Hopkins Medicine

Categories : COVID Diet and NutritionTags :

Healthy Diets Reduce COVID Risk

On By ModernMedia
Photo by Ella Olsson on Pexels

A study based on self-reported app data showed that people who eat a high quality, gut friendly diet are less likely to develop COVID-19 or become severely ill. Those eating poorer quality diets are more at risk, especially if they live in a more socioeconomically deprived area.

The study, presented in GUT, analysed data from almost 600 000 ZOE COVID Study app contributors. Participants completed a survey about the food they ate before the pandemic, in February 2020, making it the largest study in this space. 19% of these contributors contracted COVID-19.

People with the highest quality diet were around 10% less likely to develop COVID than those with the lowest quality diet, and 40% less likely to fall severely ill.

This is the first longitudinal study of diet and COVID and the first to show that a healthy diet cuts the chances of developing the disease in the first place.

Instead of looking at specific foods, the survey aimed to broadly capture people’s diets. A ‘diet quality score’ reflected the overall merit of each person’s diet. Diets with high quality scores were found to contain plant-based foods such as fruits, vegetables and whole grains, as well as oily fish, less processed foods and refined carbohydrates. A low diet quality score is associated with diets high in ultra processed foods and low amounts of plant based foods.

The researchers found that people who ate the highest quality diet were around 10% less likely to develop COVID-19 than those with the least nutritious diet and 40% less likely to become severely ill if they developed COVID.

The link between diet quality and COVID risk persisted after accounting for all potential confounding factors such as age and BMI. Mask-wearing habits and population density were also considered.

The effect of diet was amplified by individual life situations, with people living in low-income neighbourhoods with the lowest quality diet being around 25% more at risk from COVID than people in more affluent communities eating the same kind of diet.

Based on these results, the researchers estimate that nearly a quarter of COVID cases could have been prevented if these differences in diet quality and socioeconomic status had not existed. The study also showed that improved access to better food is an important public health consideration.

Dr Sarah Berry, study co-lead and Reader in nutritional sciences at the School of Life Course Sciences said: “For the first time we’ve been able to show that a healthier diet can cut the chances of developing COVID, especially for people living in the more deprived areas. Access to healthier food is important to everyone in society, but our findings tell us that helping those living in more deprived areas to eat more healthily could have the biggest public health benefits.”

Professor Tim Spector, professor of genetic epidemiology at the School of Life Course Sciences, said: “These findings chime with recent results from our landmark PREDICT study, showing that people who eat higher quality diets (with low levels of ultra-processed foods) have a healthier collection of microbes in their guts, which is linked to better health. You don’t have to go vegan, but getting more diverse plants on your plate is a great way to boost the health of your gut microbiome, improve your immunity and overall health, and potentially reduce your risk from COVID.”

Source: Kings College London