Pre-surgery exercise and education, or ‘prehabilitation’, can significantly improve outcomes for patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery, according to new research published in JAMA Network Open.
An ageing population plus the COVID pandemic has put great strains on healthcare systems, creating a longer waiting time for patients due to undergo routine elective surgical procedures. This can cause mental and physical deconditioning in patients, potentially impacting their surgical outcomes.
The study found prehabilitation may mitigate these negative factors and assist in improving strength and function prior to a surgical intervention. This may include exercise, patient education, pain management and psychological support.
Researchers from Anglia Ruskin University (ARU), Addenbrooke’s – Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (CUH) and Western University in Ontario, Canada, examined the results of 48 unique clinical trials involving prehabilitation techniques such as exercise, pain management and acupuncture among patients about to undergo orthopaedic surgery.
Outcomes were measured prior to surgery as well as at intervals post-operation. Results were graded for certainty, or confidence that results were true.
Prior to surgery, the study found strong evidence that prehabilitation led to a reduction in back pain for people waiting for lower back surgery and evidence of moderate certainty for improvement in their health-related quality of life.
For patients waiting for total knee replacement, evidence of moderate certainty showed prehabilitation improved function and muscle strength. For patients waiting for a total hip replacement, evidence of moderate certainty showed prehabilitation improved health-related quality of life and hip muscle strength.
Following an operation, the study found that prehabilitation improved function in the short to medium term compared with no prehabilitation. In particular, evidence of moderate certainty suggested prehabilitation had favourable outcomes on function in those who had undergone knee replacement surgery at six weeks post-operatively. Evidence of moderate certainty also suggests prehabilitation improved function six months after lower back surgery.
Lead author Anuj Punnoose, ARU PhD candidate and Clinical Specialist Physiotherapist at CUH, said: “This study stemmed out of a need to find the best ways to prepare orthopaedic patients prior to surgery and prevent them from further deconditioning. Furthermore, any prehabilitation programme should ideally be delivered for at least four to six weeks prior to the surgical intervention and twice a week for optimum results. Health services looking at developing such programmes could utilise recommendations from this study.”
Much of South Africa’s public health sector is plagued by long waiting times for surgery, a situation that was made much worse by the COVID-19 pandemic. Now, an inspiring project at Groote Schuur Hospital in Cape Town has reached the target of slashing its backlog by 1 500 elective surgeries – two months ahead of target.
At the end of March, a small team of healthcare workers completed the project called ‘Surgical Recovery’. The project ran from May 2022 and was originally planned to conclude 12 months later.
While this hasn’t cleared the entire backlog of people waiting for surgery at Groote Schuur, it has helped the hospital return to about the same waiting list level as it had before the COVID-19 pandemic, according to Professor Lydia Cairncross, the head of general surgery at Groote Schuur. (Spotlight previously reported on the human cost of surgical waiting lists and on what could be done about it.)
The surgeries took place mainly in the E4 Surgical Day Ward at Groote Schuur. Cairncross explains that ward E4 was built as a Day Ward – meaning it handles surgeries where patients don’t require an overnight stay pre- or post-surgery – with the aim of increasing daycare surgery capacity for the hospital. And for the last 12 months, it has been the host of the Surgical Recovery Project.
E4 has 16 patient beds, four recovery beds, and two theatres, which were completed just as the COVID-19 pandemic hit the country. During the third wave of the pandemic, it was used as a COVID High Care Unit.
According to Dr Shrikant Peters, a public health specialist and the medical manager of theatre and ICU services at Groote Schuur, the hospital’s CEO Dr Bhavna Patel “had the foresight to request provincial use of COVID funding to develop the space as COVID High Care, and eventually to be used long-term as an Operating Suite and High Care Ward in line with prior hospital plans”.
The Surgical Recovery Project
By the end of the third wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, according to Cairncross, there were discussions about how to catch up on the surgeries that had to be postponed because of COVID-19.
“The backlog in surgery comes on top of a pre-existing backlog. So, it’s not that the backlog was created by COVID, but it made it much, much, much worse,” she says, “In November 2021, we did an audit of how many patients were just physically waiting for surgery at the hospital. It was around 6 000 plus. We don’t actually have a baseline for pre-COVID, but we knew that we lost about 50% of our operating capacity,” Cairncross says.
“So, the idea was really to find a way to utilise this theatre space so that we could catch up with some of that backlog.”
From here, the Surgical Recovery Project for Groote Schuur was born with the ambitious target of performing 1 500 surgeries in 12 months.
Funds from the project came from three sources. Kristy Evans, head of the Groote Schuur Hospital Trust, tells Spotlight that fundraising for the project was kick-started by a R5 million donation from Gift of the Givers. The recently established Groote Schuur Hospital Trust focused on Surgical Recovery as their first project to fundraise for. An additional R1 million was raised by the Trust from over 500 corporate and private donors.
“People are always willing… [they] give what they can. We had donations from people who would transfer R10 into the account, sometimes people transfer R180 000,” Evans says.
She adds that the Project will continue into its second year, but the details regarding targets had not yet been finalised by the time of publication.
The Western Cape Provincial Department of Health also donated around R6.5 million to the project from their budget for surgical recovery post-COVID-19. According to Mark van der Heever, the provincial health spokesperson, this money was part of the R20 million that the department allocated to various surgical backlog recovery initiatives.
“[The] COVID-19 pandemic meant that elective surgical services had to be significantly de-escalated, as staff were deployed to COVID services, and this resulted in an increase in the backlog of operations. Hence, a specific practi[cal] plan to address this backlog in the short and long term has been developed,” says van der Heever. “Similar projects and initiatives across hospitals have already taken shape and also yielded success, such as at Karl Bremer Hospital, which also received a portion of the R20 million from the department. The hospital was able to perform an extra 328 procedures since August last year.”
Working around difficulties
At Groote Schuur, the project had to find a way to work around the difficulties of surgical catch-up. According to Cairncross, with any surgical catch-up, the challenges don’t just come from needing a physical space to operate in but also from having the appropriately trained staff. Not having enough trained staff in the public health sector, like theatre and surgery nurses, makes it hard to implement a surgical catch-up programme, even if there is money to do so.
To work around these difficulties, they came up with a centralised model for surgical recovery, where one theatre team of nurses could be employed on a contract rate for the 12 months. This team, led by Sister Melinda Davids, the nursing operations manager for the E4 theatre, would work Monday to Thursday in one of the E4 theatres and occasionally other theatres in the hospital for each of the 1 500 surgeries.
According to Cairncross, many surgeons, herself included, would come and operate on patients in addition to their normal surgeries and other duties. The funds, a total of about R 12.5 million, were used to pay the staff involved in the surgeries. The day-to-day operations were run by Davids and Peters.
According to Peters, the 1 500 operations occurred across all surgical specialities, ranging from cataract to cardiothoracic.
Success factors
Cairncross attributes the success of the project to the existing systems at Groote Schuur, supportive management, and the dedication of the surgical team and surgeons that gave their time to the project.
She says that because the hospital has a relatively functional system to start off with and a supportive management team, it allowed for “enough of a regulatory environment to keep things safe and above board but not to the extent where you can’t move”.
It was also about having the right person in charge of the team, she adds, gesturing to Davids.
Davids, who started her nursing career in 1989 and qualified as a theatre nurse in 2009, started working at Groote Schuur six years ago. She explains that the surgical team at E4 consisted of about 18 people. This includes herself, five scrub nurses, three anaesthetic nurses, three floor nurses, a registered nurse who assists in recovery, and a clerk. Peters adds that there are also two surgical medical officers and two anaesthetic registrars.
According to Davids, when the project started, several of the nurses had not worked in a theatre before so had to be trained and upskilled by her and some of the specialist nurses who make up the scrub nurse team. She also had to get creative about having the right equipment for each surgery, which sometimes meant she had to borrow equipment from other theatres.
“It’s been a challenge, but it’s a good challenge that’s kept me going,” she says. “We’re a good team.”
“Trust [in staff] has been fundamental to this,” says Peters, “I mean, the ability to trust junior staff to upskill themselves to become scrub nurses, to hand surgeons the right instrument when they asked for it. That’s been really heart-warming.”
‘Behind every number on the list is a patient’
When asked why it was so important to do this kind of catch-up, Cairncross says the surgeries that were postponed during the COVID-19 pandemic were ones that weren’t urgent or emergent, but those patients who were bumped still struggled physically because of the delays.
“Behind every number on the list is a patient with a story of either progressive blindness, invasive skull tumours, or tumours around the auditory canal that result in hearing loss, chronic pain from joint problems and urinary retention with recurrent infections and admissions or having a stoma bag [a colostomy bag] with them for months longer than needed,” Cairncross says. “Heart-breaking stories and often these were the patients who kept getting cancelled [on]. They would come in and if something urgent would come up, they would be cancelled or the COVID wave would come.”
She adds that at the time when the idea for Surgical Recovery came about, the morale amongst the surgical teams was at a real low. Patients would be coming to the outpatient clinics and asking, for the umpteenth time, “when am I going to have my operation?” to which the healthcare workers had to keep responding that they don’t know.
“It’s just a terrible thing and so people [staff] started to feel disempowered and disillusioned and I really think that the project helped them to at least see some progress. That there were some changes or some shift in what they were dealing with,” Cairncross says. “It hasn’t cleared our entire backlog, and a once-off project will not do that, but it has reset us pretty close to where we were pre-COVID-19.”
Peters adds that while the backlogs haven’t been fully cleared, “for every case that we’ve done in the project, it’s someone off of a waiting list”.
Health system at a ‘precipice’
While the COVID-19 pandemic caused many surgeries to be postponed and added tremendously to surgical waiting lists, it isn’t the only factor contributing to backlogs. According to Peters, the issue of a shrinking health budget for tertiary services is and will continue to add to the existing backlogs across the country.
“There’s this building backlog coming up against the shrinking budget. And that’s going to be with us for multiple years going into the future and if the clinicians aren’t protecting the budget for these patients that get missed, we’re going to focus on as we have been the emergency patients that come through the door,” he says. “But it’s always difficult for tertiary academic services because to keep up the skills of surgeons to maintain the quality of care, they do need to be managing waiting lists of booked patients. And so, I think across the country we’re going to be struggling with that across all tertiary services.”
Cairncross tells Spotlight that the project is just a temporary measure. In the long term, healthcare systems need to be fixed in order to address issues like surgical backlogs.
“The lesson, I suppose, is that these are temporising measures. We can do them, but fundamentally we need to fix the health system at a core, structural level. And we can’t work in isolation from the rest of the country because we are one health system and tertiary hospitals are only a part of that ecosystem,” she says. “The services at Groote Schuur Hospital, for example, cannot be sustained if the health systems from primary care to district health facilities, in urban and rural facilities, and across provinces are not supported and strengthened.”
The health system is at a precipice, according to Cairncross, and big academic hospitals need to be anchoring elective surgical services together with emergency services, as the problem with emergency services will only get bigger down the line if electives aren’t dealt with now.
“We know that postponed elective surgery just becomes emergency surgery over time, making cancelling elective surgery a false economy. We need to plan robust systems that ensure all types of surgical services are maintained,” she says.
“The strongest voice [in defence of the health system] is a conscious and motivated health workforce. So, where the nurses and doctors and managers are standing and defending patient services, they are supporting the health system,” she says. “I think this is an example of health workers standing up and saying, we can’t allow this deterioration in services. We’ve got to do more. We really want to tell the story, so that people can see it can be done.”
Antibiotics administered before and during surgery should be discontinued immediately after a patient’s incision is closed, according to updated recommendations for preventing surgical site infections.
Experts found no evidence that continuing antibiotics after a patient’s incision has been closed, even if it has drains, prevents surgical site infections. Continuing antibiotics does increase the patient’s risk of C. difficile infection, which causes severe diarrhoea, and antimicrobial resistance.
Strategies to Prevent Surgical Site Infections in Acute Care Hospitals: 2022 Update, published in the journal Infection Control and Healthcare Epidemiology, provides evidence-based strategies for preventing infections for all types of surgeries from top experts from five medical organisations led by the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America.
“Many surgical site infections are preventable,” said Michael S. Calderwood, MD, MPH, lead author on the updated guidelines. “Ensuring that healthcare personnel know, utilise, and educate others on evidence-based prevention practices is essential to keeping patients safe during and after their surgeries.”
Surgical site infections are among the most common and costly healthcare-associated infections, occurring in approximately 1% to 3% of patients undergoing inpatient surgery. Patients with surgical site infections are up to 11 times more likely to die compared to patients without such infections.
Other recommendations:
Obtain a full allergy history from patients who self-report penicillin allergy. Many patients with a self-reported penicillin allergy can safely receive cefazolin, a cousin to penicillin, rather than alternate antibiotics that are less effective against surgical infections.
For high-risk procedures, especially orthopaedic and cardiothoracic surgeries, decolonise patients with an anti-staphylococcal agent in the pre-operative setting. Decolonization, which was elevated to an essential practice in this guidance, can reduce post-operative S. aureus infections.
For patients with an elevated blood glucose level, monitor and maintain post-operative blood glucose levels between 110 and 150mg/dL regardless of diabetes status. Higher glucose levels in the post-operative setting are associated with higher infection rates. However, more intensive post-operative blood glucose control targeting levels below 110mg/dL has been associated with a risk of significantly lowering the blood glucose level and increasing the risk of stroke or death.
Use antimicrobial prophylaxis before elective colorectal surgery. Mechanical bowel preparation without use of oral antimicrobial agents has been associated with significantly higher rates of surgical site infection and anastomotic leakage. The use of parenteral and oral antibiotics prior to elective colorectal surgery is now considered an essential practice.
Consider negative-pressure dressings, especially for abdominal surgery or joint arthroplasty patients. Placing negative-pressure dressings over closed incisions was identified as a new option because evidence has shown these dressings reduce surgical site infections in certain patients. Negative pressure dressings are thought to work by reducing fluid accumulation around the wound.
Additional topics covered in the update include specific risk factors for surgical site infections, surveillance methods, infrastructure requirements, use of antiseptic wound lavage, and sterile reprocessing in the operating room, among other guidance.
Hospitals may consider these additional approaches when seeking to further improve outcomes after they have fully implemented the list of essential practices. The document classifies tissue oxygenation, antimicrobial powder, and gentamicin-collagen sponges as unresolved issues according to current evidence.
Researchers in Sweden have performed a nation-wide study of patients who underwent bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement between 2003 and 2018. The study, published in the Journal of the American College of Cardiology, shows that it is less dangerous than previously believed to receive a small bioprosthetic aortic valve in relation to the patients size.
During surgical aortic valve replacement, the patient receives a valve prosthesis that matches the size of the aortic root. Sometimes, that size is too small in relation to the patient’s body size. This puts strain on the heart to pump enough blood that the body needs through a narrow valve. The level of “narrowness” is measured as Prosthesis Patient Mismatch, PPM.
“Prior studies have shown that both moderate and severe PPM decreases survival and increases the risk for heart failure. In our study, we can confirm that severe PPM decreases survival and increases the risk for heart failure, while moderate PPM has a very limited effect on survival and no effect on the risk for heart failure”, says Michael Dismorr, postdoctoral researcher at the Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery and first author of the study.
The study
The study included all patients who underwent bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement in Sweden between 2003 and 2018. Patients were identified from the Swedish cardiac surgery register, part of the SWEDEHEART register. The database was enriched with data from other national health data registers. By using the statistical method regression standardization we were able to estimate the risk for the outcomes death, heart failure and reintervention in absolute terms between the groups no, moderate and severe PPM.
The study shows that the estimated risk difference between no and moderate PPM for death after 10 years of follow-up was -1.7% (-3.3% to -0.1%) compared to -4.6% (-8.5% to -0.7%) for severe PPM.
The risk difference for heart failure after 10 years of follow-up was -1.1% (-2.5% to 0.2%) between patients with no and moderate PPM.
“A risk difference of a single percent after 10 years of follow-up cannot be said to be of clinical significance, even if it is statistically so. However, it is important to note that these are hard clinical outcomes. We did not have access to “soft” outcomes such as quality of life, which might be decreased in patients with moderate PPM, and in that case of course of great importance to those patients”, says Michael Dismorr.
Next steps
“Now we want to study the effect of PPM in patients who underwent transcatheter aortic valve replacement, a so called TAVR procedure. This is important knowledge when deciding which patients will benefit the most from a surgical replacement, and which patients will benefit the most from a transcatheter replacement”, says Michael Dismorr.
Arthritis in the knee’s patellofemoral joint (PFJ) is common following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and may be linked with altered loading at the joint. In a study published in the Journal of Orthopaedic Research, young adults post‐ACLR who exhibited lower PFJ loading during hopping were more likely to have PFJ osteoarthritis at one year and worsening PFJ osteoarthritis between one and five years post-procedure.
In the study, data for net PFJ contact force were normalised to each participant’s body weight. For every one body weight decrease in the peak PFJ contact force during hopping, the proportion of people at one year post-ACLR with early PFJ osteoarthritis increased by 37%, and the risk of worsening PFJ osteoarthritis between one and five years post-ACLR increased by 55%.
“Clinical interventions aimed at mitigating osteoarthritis progression may be beneficial for those with signs of lower PFJ loading post-ACLR,” the authors wrote.
Inaccurately recording the start of anaesthesia care during a procedure is common and results in significant lost billing time for anaesthesia practices and medical centres, suggests a study being presented at the American Society of Anesthesiologists’ ADVANCE 2023, the Anesthesiology Business Event.
The anaesthesia start time (AST) must be documented from a computer logged into the electronic health record (EHR), and typically occurs once the patient is in the operating room (OR). However, the anaesthesiologist meets with the patient prior to their arrival in the OR and begins tasks that are vital to the procedure, such as administering pre-medication and attaching monitors, time which is is not typically recorded. Depending on the patient and procedure, adding two to five minutes to the AST when logging it would account for the preparation and transit time, researchers say.
“These seemingly minor inaccuracies of recorded AST can cost medical centres and anaesthesia practices hundreds of thousands of dollars in lost revenue,” said Nicholas Volpe Jr, MD, MBA, lead author of the study and an anaesthesiology resident physician at Northwestern University McGaw Medical Center, Chicago. “We suspect most anaesthesiologists are unaware that they aren’t recording AST accurately. It’s not a result of negligence, but rather reflects that workflow hasn’t been optimised for accuracy.”
For the study, the researchers analysed 40 312 procedures with anaesthesia over 12 months at a single academic centre. In 68.74% of cases , AST was recorded as starting once the patient was in the OR, without factoring in the preparation time. Using the national average charge for anesthaesia time, the missing time translated to over $600 000 in lost revenue for the year, the researchers determined.*
“Logging AST is one of the many new tasks that anaesthesiologists learn when starting a new role,” said Dr Volpe. “Transitioning from an internship to clinical anaesthesia practice involves learning a significant amount of new information, and understanding the importance of an accurately recorded AST may seem like a relatively minor issue compared to important patient-care information.”
Several approaches could help address inaccurate AST documentation, including educating anaesthesiologists on how to improve their AST recording practices and providing visual reminders such as signs in the OR, Dr Volpe said. Also, an AST capture function could be built into the EHR mobile application so that AST can be noted by anaesthesiologists on the way to the OR, or the EHR could automatically add two minutes to the AST log time, he said. The researchers plan to roll out some of those initiatives in the spring and determine if they are effective.
*The projected savings are theoretical and not linked to billing at the institution where the study was conducted.
Cannabis use may negatively impact outcomes in peripheral artery bypass (PAB) surgery, suggests a study published in Annals of Vascular Surgery.
Researchers analysed more than 11 000 available cases to review patient cannabis use and postoperative outcomes for lower extremity bypass after 30 days and one year. The minimally invasive PAB procedure uses a vein or synthetic to tube to divert blood around a narrowed or blocked artery in a leg.
Results reveal that patients who used cannabis prior to lower extremity bypass had decreased patency, meaning the graft had a higher chance of becoming blocked or occluded, and were 1.25 times more likely to require amputation one year after surgery. Cannabis users were also 1.56 times more likely to use opioids after discharge.
“The findings show a need for screening for cannabis use and open conversations between patients and clinicians to help inform preoperative risk assessment and decision-making for lower extremity bypass,” said senior author Peter Henke, MD, FACS, FAHA
“While its exact mechanisms are unclear, cannabis and its active compounds play a role in platelet function and microcirculation that may lead to decreased rates of limb salvage after lower extremity bypass,” Henke said.
Around 43% of individuals in the United States and Canada have used cannabis. Previous studies suggest cannabis use has effects on the cardiovascular system, including increased risk of heart attack and stroke. The study did not find any association with stroke or heart attack after lower extremity bypass.
While future study is needed to further understand cannabis’ full effect on outcomes, researchers note, the findings will help clinicians counsel patients who are undergoing vascular surgery.
“While past studies on the effects of cannabis use on pain response suggested an increase in pain tolerance after smoking cannabis, our studies and other contemporary findings show the opposite,” said Drew Braet, M.D., first author and integrated vascular surgery resident at U-M Health. “Given the increase in cannabis use and abuse in conjunction with the opioid epidemic, the results suggest a need for a better understanding of pain management for cannabis users who are having vascular surgery.”
Performing open bypass surgery to restore circulation for people with a severe form of peripheral artery disease (PAD) resulted in better outcomes for specific patients compared to a less-invasive procedure, according to findings published in the New England Journal of Medicine.
PAD is a condition in which blood flow to one or both legs is reduced by a buildup of fatty plaque in the arteries. One in 10 of patients with this condition develop a severe form of PAD called chronic limb-threatening ischaemia (CLTI), a painful and debilitating condition that can lead to amputation if untreated. Up to about 22 million people worldwide have CLTI, which is also associated with an increased risk of heart attack, stroke, and death.
“Given the projected rise in the number of patients with chronic limb-threatening ischaemia, it is critically important that we understand the full impact of our interventions for this disease,” said Matthew Menard, MD, a study author and associate professor of surgery and co-director of the endovascular surgery program at Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston. “These findings help do that and also can assist clinicians and caregivers in providing the best possible care to patients.”
The Best Endovascular versus Best Surgical Therapy for Patients with CLTI (BEST-CLI) trial is a landmark study supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI).
To compare effectiveness of two common treatments for CLTI, researchers enrolled 1830 adults who were planning to have revascularisation, a procedure used to restore blood flow in their blocked arteries, and who were eligible for both treatment strategies.
One treatment strategy was an open bypass surgery, in which blood is redirected around the blocked leg artery by using a segment of a healthy vein. The other strategy was an endovascular procedure, where a balloon is dilated and/or a stent is placed in the blocked segment of the artery to improve blood flow. To compare the surgical strategy to the less-invasive endovascular approach, researchers randomised participants into one of two parallel trials between 2014–2021.
The first trial, defined as cohort 1, included 1434 adults who were judged to be the best candidates for the bypass surgery because they had an adequate amount of an optimal vein (the single-segment great saphenous vein) preferred for the procedure. Participants were then randomly assigned to have either a surgical bypass or endovascular procedure. Researchers followed the trial participants for up to seven years.
The second trial, defined as cohort 2, included 396 adults who were not the best candidates for the open bypass because they did not have an adequate amount of the preferred saphenous vein. They were randomised to have either an endovascular procedure or a bypass that used alternate graft material instead of the saphenous vein. Participants were followed-up for up to three years.
At the end of the trial, the researchers found that participants in cohort 1 who received the bypass were 32% less likely to have major medical events related to CLTI than those who had an endovascular procedure. This result was driven by a 65% reduction in major repeat surgeries or procedures to retain blood flow in the lower leg and a 27% reduction in major amputations. No differences were found in death rates between the participants who received the bypass surgery and those who received an endovascular procedure.
Adults in cohort 2 – those who did not have the optimal vein for the bypass – had no major differences in outcomes based on having had an open bypass or an endovascular procedure.
“Our findings support complementary roles for these two treatment strategies and emphasise the need for preprocedural planning to assess patients and inform what treatment is selected,” said co-principal investigator Alik Farber, MD, at Boston Medical Center.
Common symptoms of CLTI include leg and foot pain, foot infections, and open sores on the leg and foot that don’t fully heal. Without having a procedure to redirect or open blocked blood flow to the lower body, about 4 in 10 adults with CLTI have a lower leg or foot amputation.
BEST-CLI is the largest CLTI clinical trial to date and builds on prior research that aims to answer questions about the risks and benefits of revascularisation strategies for CLTI.
Surgical care experts published two important studies in The Lancet that will help to provide safer surgery for thousands of patients around the world – particularly in Low- and Middle-income Countries (LMIC) such as South Africa.
Researchers found that routinely changing gloves and instruments just before closing wounds could significantly reduce Surgical Site Infection (SSI), the most common post-operative complication. This switch could prevent as many as 1 in 8 cases of SSI.
Secondly, they tested a new toolkit that can make hospitals better prepared for pandemics, heatwaves, winter pressures and natural disasters that could reduce cancellations of planned procedures around the world.
Surgical infections
Patients in LMICs are disproportionately affected by wound infections. The ChEETAh trial was run in Benin, Ghana, India, Mexico, Nigeria, Rwanda and South Africa. With the publication of their findings in The Lancet, researchers are calling for the practice to be widely implemented – particularly in LMICs.
Co-author Mr Aneel Bhangu, from the University of Birmingham, commented: “Surgical site infection is the world’s most common postoperative complication – a major burden for both patients and health systems. Our work demonstrates that routine change of gloves and instruments is not only deliverable around the world, but also reduced infections in a range of surgical settings. Taking this simple step could reduce SSIs by 13% – simply and cost-effectively.”
Patients who develop SSI experience pain, disability, poor healing with risk of wound breakdown, prolonged recovery times and psychological challenges. In health systems where patients have to pay for treatment this can be a disaster and increases the risk of patients being plunged into poverty after their treatment. The simple and low-cost practice of changing your gloves and instruments just before closing the wound is something which can be done by surgeons in any hospital around, meaning a huge potential impact.
Surgical Preparedness Index
Experts from the NIHR Global Research Health Unit on Global Surgery also unveiled their ‘Surgical Preparedness Index’ (SPI) in The Lancet. This is a key study assessing the extent to which hospitals around the world were able to continue elective surgery during COVID.
Researchers identified different features of hospitals that made them more or less ‘prepared’ for times of increased pressure. Using COVID as an important example, they highlighted that health systems are put under stress for all sorts of reasons each year – from seasonal pressures to natural disasters, and warfare. A team of clinicians from 32 countries designed the SPI which scores hospitals based on their infrastructure, equipment, staff, and processes used to provide elective surgery. The higher the resulting SPI score, the more prepared a hospital is for disruptions.
After creating the SPI tool, the experts asked 4714 clinicians in 1632 hospitals across 119 countries to assess the preparedness of their local surgical department. Overall most hospitals around the world were poorly prepared, and suffered a big drop in the number of procedures they were able to provide during COVID. A 10-point increase in the SPI score corresponded to four more patients that had surgery per 100 patients on the waitlist.
Lead author Mr. James Glasbey, from the University of Birmingham, commented: “Our new tool will help hospitals internationally improve their preparation for external stresses ranging from pandemics to heatwaves, winter pressures and natural disasters. We believe it help hospitals to get through their waiting lists more quickly, and prevent further delays for patients. The tool can be completed easily by healthcare workers and managers working in any hospital worldwide – if used regularly, it could protect hospitals and patients against future disruptions.”
Professor Dion Morton, Barling Chair of Surgery at the University of Birmingham and Director of Clinical Research at the Royal College of Surgeons of England commented: “Although not all postoperative deaths are avoidable, many can be prevented by increasing investment in research, staff training, equipment, and better hospital facilities. We must invest in improving the quality of surgery around the world.”
A new ultrasonic technique developed for emergency kidney stone treatments on Mars may offer an option to move kidney stones out of the ureter with minimal pain and no anaesthesia, according to a new feasibility study published in The Journal of Urology.
In the procedure, the physician uses a handheld transducer placed on the skin to direct ultrasound waves towards the stone. Using ultrasound propulsion, the stones can then moved and repositioned to promote their passage, while burst wave lithotripsy (BWL) can break up the stone.
Unlike with the standard technique of shock wave lithotripsy, there is minimal pain according to lead author Dr M. Kennedy Hall, a UW Medicine emergency medicine doctor. “It’s nearly painless, and you can do it while the patient is awake, and without sedation, which is critical.”
The researchers hope that one day the procedure of moving or breaking up the stones could eventually be performed in a clinic or emergency room setting with this technology, Dr Hall added.
Ureteral stones can cause severe pain and are a common reason for emergency department visits. Most patients with ureteral stones are advised to wait to see if the stone will pass on its own. However, this observation period can last for weeks, with nearly one-fourth of patients eventually requiring surgery, Dr Hall noted.
Dr Hall and colleagues evaluated the new technique to meet the need for a way to treat stones without surgery.
The study was designed to test the feasibility of using the ultrasonic propulsion or using BWL to break up stones in awake, unanaesthetised patients, Dr Hall said.
The study recruited 29 patients; 16 received propulsion and 13 received propulsion and BWL. In 19 patients, the stones moved. In two cases, the stones moved out of the ureter and into the bladder.
Burst wave lithotripsy fragmented the stones in seven of the cases. At a two-week follow up, 18 of 21 patients (86%) whose stones were located lower in the ureter, closer to the bladder, had passed their stones. In this group, the average time to stone passage was about four days, the study noted.
One of these patients felt “immediate relief” when the stone was dislodged from the ureter, the study stated.
The next step would a clinical trial with a control group, which would not receive either BWL bursts or ultrasound propulsion, to evaluate the degree to which this new technology potentially aids stone passage, Dr Hall said.
Development of this technology first started five years ago, when NASA funded a study to see if kidney stones could be moved or broken up, without anaesthesia, on long space flights, such as the Mars missions. The technology has worked so well that NASA has downgraded kidney stones as a key concern.
“We now have a potential solution for that problem,” Dr Hall said.
