Category: COVID

Categories : COVID VaccinesTags :

The Complex Web of South African Vaccine Hesitancy

On By ModernMedia
Photo by Mika Baumeister on Unsplash

A review of surveys towards COVID vaccines in South Africa has revealed that there are multiple factors at work, with an underlying scepticism towards vaccines in general that appears to be growing in the very face of the pandemic.

The findings, published in Expert Review of Vaccines, highlight the multi-faceted and unique aspects of vaccine hesitancy in South Africa, such as men being more likely to reject a vaccine.

Vaccine hesitancy is not new; two years before the emergency of COVID the World Health Organization identified it as a top ten threat to health, underscored by outbreaks of preventable diseases such as measles.

A previous review of 126 surveys in 2020 found a global decline of COVID vaccine acceptance from 70% in March to 50% by October. Vaccine hesitancy has been an obstacle in South Africa for a long time: it was a factor in various measles outbreaks from 2003 to 2011, and it became more apparent during the nation-wide school HPV vaccination programme begun in 2014.

The researchers searched for surveys on COVID vaccine hesitancy in South Africa up until 15 March 2021, with sample sizes ranging from 403 to 75 518.

Unlike elsewhere, men are more hesitant
In a survey by Ask Africa, men were more likely to distrust vaccines (39%) than women (26%). Of the women who would refuse, there was a higher percentage who would  However, women were more likely to take the vaccine even if they thought it was unsafe. The authors cautioned that this result should be interpreted with caution; however, Department of Health deputy director Dr Nicholas Crisp also recently pointed this out, suggesting that more recent survey data helped inform his opinion.
Curiously, this is in contrast to other COVID studies and other vaccine studies in general, which indicate that women are more hesitant than men when it comes to vaccines in general. 

Age, race, education, geographical location
Three of the studies found that age may be important, with older adults having less concerns and/or being more accepting of COVID vaccination. 

The COVID-19 Democracy survey found that people 55 or older were more likely to take the vaccine (74%) compared to those 18 to 24 years old (63%).
The same survey found that white adults were the least likely racial group to accept vaccination, with only 56% willing to be vaccinated compared to 69% of black African adults. Education was another factor, with just 59% of tertiary educated people willing to be vaccinated compared to 72% of this who did not complete high school.

Council for Medical Schemes (CMS) survey found that vaccine acceptance was higher (83%) in urban suburban settings compared to other settings (73% and 78%).

Doubts about safety significant
Three rounds of Ipsos survey data showed a huge drop in acceptance from 64% in July/August and 68% in October to 53% in December. Of those not accepting, concern about side effects as a reason rose from 30% in October to 65% in December.

The Ask Afrika survey indicated that stopping the roll-out of the AstraZeneca vaccine early this year reduced both levels of trust in vaccine safety and confidence in the process. 

Of particular concern were several surveys indicating South African antipathy to all vaccines; in the Ipsos surveys, about a quarter refusing COVID vaccines were also opposed to vaccines in general. Thus, this hesitancy to COVID vaccines, the authors suggest, is just the tip of the iceberg of South African vaccine hesitancy.  Indeed, the Africa CDC survey indicated that at least one in five South Africans were less likely to get vaccinated in general than before the pandemic.

More research and targeted messaging needed
Overall, the authors found about a third of the adult South African public is hesitant towards COVID vaccines. Age, race, education, geographic locations and possibly gender all influence the social nature of vaccine acceptance in South Africa.

The authors conclude that responding to vaccine hesitancy, including COVID vaccine hesitancy, requires a better understanding of the often complex and multi-layered issues influencing vaccination views and practices, and tailoring interventions accordingly. Individualistic, decontextualised, and ‘one-size-fits-all’ approaches are unlikely to have great success.

Source: Expert Review of Vaccines

Categories : COVIDTags :

COVID Most Contagious 2 Days Before to 3 Days After Symptoms Start

On By ModernMedia
SourceL Usman Yousaf on Unsplash

A new study published in JAMA Internal Medicine has found that individuals infected with the virus are most contagious two days before, and three days after, they develop symptoms.

The study also found that infected individuals were more likely to be asymptomatic if they contracted the virus from a primary case (the first infected person in an outbreak) who was also asymptomatic.

“In previous studies, viral load has been used as an indirect measure of transmission,” explained Dr Leonardo Martinez, assistant professor of epidemiology at BUSPH, and who co-led the study with Dr Yang Ge, research assistant in the Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics at the University of Georgia College of Public Health. “We wanted to see if results from these past studies, which show that COVID cases are most transmissible a few days before and after symptom onset, could be confirmed by looking at secondary cases among close contacts.”

The investigators performed contact tracing and studied COVID transmission among approximately 9000 close contacts of primary cases in the Zhejiang province of China from January 2020 to August 2020. ‘Close’ contacts included household contacts (individuals living in the same household or who dined together), co-workers, people in hospital settings, and riders in shared vehicles. The researchers monitored infected individuals for at least 90 days after their initial positive COVID test results to distinguish between asymptomatic and pre-symptomatic cases.

Of the primary cases, 89 percent developed mild or moderate symptoms, and only 11 percent were asymptomatic — and none developed severe symptoms. Household members of primary cases, as well as those exposed to primary cases more often or for longer time, had the highest infection rates among close contacts. But regardless of these risk factors, close contacts were more likely to contract COVID from the primary infected individual if they were exposed shortly before or after the individual developed noticeable symptoms.

“Our results suggest that the timing of exposure relative to primary-case symptoms is important for transmission, and this understanding provides further evidence that rapid testing and quarantine after someone is feeling sick is a critical step to control the epidemic,” Dr Martinez said.

Compared to mild and moderate symptomatic individuals, asymptomatic primary individuals were much less likely to transmit COVID to close contacts — but if they did, the contacts were also less likely to experience noticeable symptoms.

Source: Newswise

Categories : COVIDTags :

Govt Switches COVID Focus to Vaccine Access and Hesitancy

On By ModernMedia
Image by Quicknews

As the official COVID death toll in South Africa passes the 80 000 mark, the Department of Health is now shifting focus to addressing flagging vaccine demand.

The department said this will include making access easier, such as vaccinating at shops or places of work.

Another change would be providing transportation to vaccine sites to help those in underprivileged areas. One option being looked into is the introduction of home vaccinations and ‘pop-up’ sites in rural areas where travel is harder to come by and at busy commercial areas such as shopping centres.

The government also hopes for assistance from the religious sector, with the possibility of churches offering vaccines on a Sunday. Mosques, synagogues and other places of worship would also offer a ‘familiar environment’ where people feel comfortable receiving a vaccine.

Public awareness
Social media will be heavily employed for vaccine promotion, and could incude online influencers and ambassadors to encourage vaccination.
This could extend to identifying ‘apolitical’ vaccine champions relevant to the target group who have also great influence, such as celebrities and traditional leaders.

A number of awareness initiatives are being considered, including making use of channels such as social media and teachers to provide information to young people and counteract misinformation, as well as more traditional media efforts such as radio slots and signage.

Vaccine skepticism high in men
Department of Health Deputy director-general Dr Nicholas Crisp, pointed out that South Africa has a particular problem with men not wanting to be vaccinated.

“This is not good,” Dr Crisp said. “It means that men are going to end up very sick and in hospital, and we don’t want that to happen just before Christmas.”

An Africa Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (ACDC) study found that 66% of men in South Africa were sceptical about vaccine safety compared to 74% of women.

Mandatory vaccinations on the cards
Health minister Dr Joe Phaahla warned of a very long road ahead as new cases continue to spike.

The ministerial advisory committee on COVID is now discussing the possibility of mandatory vaccination for certain groups of people, which could include healthcare workers and those professions spending time indoors with other people, according to the Sunday Times.

Scientists and health activists told the paper that the right to refuse a vaccine is outweighed by the health hazard of the pandemic.

The country would then be able to reopen and operate in a way as close as possible to the pre-COVID era, said leading vaccinologist Professor Shabir Madhi.

“In these settings, if people choose not to be vaccinated, they should be compelled to undergo testing every three or four days at their own expense,” he said.

While vaccinations don’t confer complete COVID protection, it is still significant, and more impactful if a greater proportion are vaccinated, Prof Madhi said.

Source: BusinessTech

Categories : COVIDTags :

Small Trial Sees ‘Astounding’ Effect of Fenofibrate in Severe COVID

On By ModernMedia
Source: Fusion Medical Animation on Unsplash

A small interventional trial with 15 severely ill COVID patients showed an ‘astounding’ effect of fenofibrate as a treatment.

Recently, Professor Yaakov Nahmias’ team at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem (HU) reported that COVID causes abnormal accumulation of lipids, known to initiate severe inflammation through a process called lipotoxicity. In 2020, the researchers conducted lab testing of fenofibrate, a lipid-lowering drug, showing it both reduced lung cell damage while blocked virus replication. These results have since been confirmed by other studies, and in October 2020 an observational study was reported to support the original findings. This led to an interventional, single-arm open-label study to validate the findings.

The study recruited 15 severe-hospitalised COVID patients with pneumonia requiring oxygen support, who were given 145 mg/day of fenofibrate for 10 days in addition to standard care and continuously monitored for disease progression and outcomes. 

‘Astounding’ results
“The results were astounding,” Prof Nahmias declared. “Progressive inflammation markers, that are the hallmark of deteriorative COVID, dropped within 48 hours of treatment. Moreover, 14 of the 15 severe patients didn’t require oxygen support within a week of treatment, while historical records show that the vast majority severe patients treated with the standard of care require lengthy respiratory support,” he added. 

No ‘silver bullet’
Fenofibrate is a well-known, FDA-approved drug for the treatment of hypertriglyceridemia, primary hypercholesterolemia, or mixed dyslipidemia and has a good safety profile. “There are no silver bullets,” cautioned Nahmias, “but fenofibrate is far safer than other drugs proposed to date, and its mechanism of action makes is less likely to be variant-specific.”

“All patients were discharged within less than a week after the treatment began and were discharged to complete the 10-day treatment at home, with no drug-related adverse events reported,” noted Professor Shlomo Maayan, head of Infectious Disease Unit at Barzilai, where the study was conducted. “Further, fewer patients reported COVID side effects during their 4-week follow-up appointment,” he added. These preliminary findings are promising for patients who severe the acute phase of severe COVID.

However, the researchers stressed that while the results were extremely promising, only randomised placebo-controlled studies can serve as basis for clinical decisions. “We entered the second phase of the study and are actively recruiting patients,” explained Prof Nahmias, noting that two Phase 3 studies are already being conducted.

The findings, which are currently under peer review, were released on Research Square.

Source: Medical Xpress

Categories : COVID HospitalsTags :

Prone Positioning Reduces Need for Mechanical Ventilation

On By ModernMedia
Source: Martha Dominguez de Gouveia on Unsplash

A ‘meta-trial’ of 1100 hospitalised COVID patients requiring high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy suggests that prone positioning soon after admission can significantly reduce the need for mechanical ventilation.

While acute respiratory distress syndrome patients have been placed prone for years by critical care specialists, this study provides clinical evidence needed to support the use of prone positioning for patients with COVID requiring high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy.

The findings, published today in the Lancet Respiratory Medicine, were conducted on severely ill COVID patients between April 2020 and January 2021.

“Breathing in the prone position helps the lungs work more efficiently,” explained the study’s lead author Dr. Jie Li, associate professor and respiratory therapist at Rush University Medical Center. “When people with severe oxygenation issues are laying on their stomachs, it results in better matching of the blood flow and ventilation in the lungs which improves blood oxygen levels.”

Prof Li noted that several interventions are available to improve oxygenation in critically ill patients, but that there was little outcomes-focused clinical evidence to show that prone positioning prior to mechanical ventilation is beneficial.

Adult patients with COVID needing respiratory support from a high-flow nasal cannula agreed to participate in this clinical trial, and were randomly assigned to the supine or prone positioning groups. They were asked to stay in that position for as long as they could tolerate. Both positioning groups received high-flow oxygen therapy and standard medical management.

Patients were continually monitored to determine if mechanical ventilation was needed. This study’s data showed that patients in the prone positioning group were significantly less likely to require mechanical ventilation (33% in the awake prone positioning group vs 40% in the supine group).

Another study lead author, Stephan Ehrmann, MD, PhD, said that “for the clinical implications of our study, awake prone positioning is a safe intervention that reduces the risk of treatment failure in acute severe hypoxemic respiratory failure due to COVID-19. Our findings support the routine implementation of awake prone positioning in critically ill patients with COVID19 requiring high flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy. It appears important that clinicians improve patient comfort during prone positioning, so the patient can stay in the position for at least 8 hours a day.”

Reducing the need for mechanical ventilation cuts down on resources needed. “Ventilators can indeed save the lives of people who are no longer able to breathe on their own. That said, we now have strategies to keep patients off the ventilator, saving those devices for the sickest patients who truly need them.” Prof Li added.

Source: Medical Xpress

Categories : COVIDTags :

Pfizer Vaccine Fully Approved in US

On By ModernMedia
Photo by Mat Napo on Unsplash

On Monday, the US Food and Drug administration approved the Pfizer/BioNTech COVID vaccine, the first vaccine against the novel coronavirus to receive full approval.

The vaccine, which will be marketed as Comirnaty, can be used for individuals ages 16 and older for COVID prevention. However, the vaccine is still under emergency use authorisation (EUA) for adolescents ages 12-15, the agency said.

FDA Acting Commissioner, Janet Woodcock, MD, said in a statement: “While this and other vaccines have met the FDA’s rigorous, scientific standards for emergency use authorisation, as the first FDA-approved COVID vaccine, the public can be very confident that this vaccine meets the high standards for safety, effectiveness, and manufacturing quality the FDA requires of an approved product.”

At a media briefing, Peter Marks, MD, PhD, the director for the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research at FDA, detailed the meticulous process used for conducting a review of a biologics license application for full approval, including invidivual analysis of adverse events.

Since 11 December, 2020, the vaccine has been under an EUA for individuals ages 16 and older. Evidence for the full approval comes from expanded phase III trial safety and efficacy data released by the manufacturer this April. An analysis of 927 confirmed cases in the trial’s 44 000 participants found that 7 days after the second dose, Comirnaty had a 91.3% efficacy against symptomatic COVID through 6 months.

More than half of the participants had over 4 months of safety data, including 12 000 people who were followed up through 6 months. Injection site pain, fatigue, headache, muscle or joint pain, and fever were the most common adverse events. A slight increase in risk for myocarditis and pericarditis up to 7 days after the second dose was noted, particularly in males under 40 (peaking in ages 12-17), but symptoms resolved completely.

Trial data was collected before the Delta variant became the dominant strain in the US, Dr Marks noted, Israeli “real world” suggest the vaccine still retains effectiveness but wanes. This is something the agency will follow. 

Former FDA commissioner Dr. Mark McClellan, who now directs the Duke-Margolis Center for Health Policy, spoke to the media about the approval, saying surveys showed that it will help sway vaccine holdouts.

“I do think it will make a difference. Maybe not a large number of people running out and getting a vaccine today. At this point we’ve got a little bit over 70 percent of Americans who are eligible for the vaccine have gotten at least one dose. That’s about 87 million Americans who are eligible who haven’t. Out of those, according to some recent surveys, about 30 percent say the full approval of the Pfizer vaccine would make a difference in their decisions.”

Source: MedPage Today

Categories : COVIDTags :

Anticoagulation Improves Survival Odds of Moderately Ill COVID Patients

On By ModernMedia
Credit: CC0

If treated with therapeutic-dose anticoagulation, moderately ill patients hospitalised with COVID have better odds of survival, according to an international study published in The New England Journal of Medicine.

COVID patients frequently develop a pro-coagulative state caused by virus-induced endothelial dysfunction, cytokine storm and complement cascade hyperactivation. Thrombotic risk appears directly related to disease severity and worsens patients’ prognosis.

Moderately ill COVID patients treated with therapeutic-dose anticoagulation with unfractionated or low molecular-weight heparin were 27% less likely to need cardiovascular respiratory organ support such as intubation, said Ambarish Pandey, MD, Assistant Professor of Internal Medicine at UT Southwestern, who served as site investigator and . Moderately ill patients had a 4% increased chance of survival until discharge without requiring organ support with anticoagulants, according to the study involving 2200 patients.

“The 4% increase in survival to discharge without needing organ support represents a very meaningful clinical improvement in these patients,” said Dr Pandey, a Texas Health Resources Clinical Scholar specialising in preventive cardiology and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. “If we treat 1,000 patients who are hospitalized with COVID with moderate illness, an additional 40 patients would have meaningful improvement in clinical status.”

Moderately ill patients were defined as those who did not need intensive care unit-level support. The participating platforms for the study, included Antithrombotic Therapy to Ameliorate Complications of COVID-19 (ATTACC); A Multicenter, Adaptive, Randomized Controlled Platform Trial of the Safety and Efficacy of Antithrombotic Strategies in Hospitalized Adults with COVID-19 (ACTIV-4a); and Randomized, Embedded, Multifactorial Adaptive Platform Trial for Community-Acquired Pneumonia (REMAP-CAP). 

A parallel study reported in The New England Journal of Medicine found however that therapeutic-dose anticoagulation did not help severely ill patients.

Source: UT Southwestern Medical Center

Categories : COVID General InterestTags :

After Anti-vaxx Protest, Western Cape Government Speaks Out

On By ModernMedia
Photo by Marisol Benitez on Unsplash

After a group of anti-vaxxer demonstrators gathered outside Groote Schuur Hospital (GSH), Western Cape Health authorities have slammed anti-vaxxers for inflaming vaccine hesitancy. Even so, there was a record vaccination turnout on Friday when inoculations were offered to over 18s.

“I just don’t understand why people don’t believe us when we say that the vaccines are safe,” Western Cape Health Department’s Dr Saadiq Kariem said, warning of the damage that misinformation can do.

“There’s no 3G in the vaccine. There’s certainly no conspiracy theory. All we’re trying to do is help by making sure that the population is as protected as possible against coronavirus,” Dr Kariem said, adding that it was even more dangerous when medical professionals were against the shots.

“It just baffles my mind how other medical professionals can, in fact, be anti-vaccination because people will believe professionals, you know, and take their word as they’ve studied this field,” he added. Some of the protesters were carrying signs in support of controversial anti-vaxxer doctors.

IOL reports that one man who was employed by the hospital and chose not to be named, stood alone in the street and faced down the protesters with a sign saying “Covidiots”. He said the pandemic had been happening for 18 months, and that the ignorance of the crowd was disgraceful.

Just before the protests got underway, the University of Cape Town had released a statement in support of GSH. “The Faculty stands in solidarity with the staff (including cleaners, security, admin staff, drivers etc) of GSH. We stand in support of their work and the herculean efforts they have taken across the era of this pandemic under extremely challenging circumstances and often at personal risk. We salute the work of our partners in delivering the best possible care in responding to the world’s greatest human tragedy.”

Source: Eyewitness News

Categories : Antibiotics COVIDTags :

Bacterial Superinfections in COVID Rarer Than Expected

On By ModernMedia

Only 21 percent of patients with severe pneumonia caused by SARS-CoV-2 have a documented bacterial superinfection at the time of intubation, resulting in potential overuse of antibiotics, according to new research.

Superinfection occurs when another, usually different, infection is superimposed on the initial infection. In this case, it is bacterial pneumonia during severe viral pneumonia.

Dr Wunderink and co-authors reported their findings in a study published online in the Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, which shows that the usual clinical criteria used to diagnose bacterial pneumonia could not distinguish between those with bacterial superinfection and those with severe SARS-CoV-2 infection only.

According to the authors, there is weak evidence behind current guidelines recommending that patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia receive empirical antibiotics on hospital admission for suspected bacterial superinfection. In other published clinical trials of patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia, rates of superinfection pneumonia are unexpectedly low.
“More accurate assessment other than just reviewing clinical parameters is needed to enable clinicians to avoid using antibiotics in the majority of these patients, but appropriately use antibiotics in the 20-25 percent who have a bacterial infection as well,” said Dr Wunderink.

The team conducted an observational study to determine the prevalence and cause of bacterial superinfection at the time of initial intubation and the incidence and cause of subsequent bacterial ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) in 179 patients with severe SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia which required mechanical ventilation.

The researchers analysed 386 bronchoscopic bronchoalveolar lavage fluid samples from patients, and actual antibiotic use was compared with guideline-recommended therapy. Bacterial superinfection within 48 hours of intubation was detected in 21 percent of patients; 72 patients (44.4 percent) developed at least one VAP episode; and 15 (20.8 percent) of initial VAPs were caused by difficult-to-treat bacteria.

The authors found that in patients with severe SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia, bacterial superinfection at the time of intubation occurred in less than 25 percent of patients. Guideline-based empirical antibiotic management at the time of intubation would have resulted in antibiotic overuse.

The researchers believe that their findings have multiple implications for antibiotic guidelines: “Rapid diagnostic tests are important for helping identify suspected pneumonia in intubated patients. This can have major clinical implications because the current approach of using clinically defined risk factors for suspected methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) or pseudomonas bacteria as the cause of pneumonia still grossly overestimate the true incidence of these pathogens. In addition, the recommendation for empirical antibiotic treatment of worsening viral community-acquired pneumonia (now requiring intubation) may need to be revisited. This is not only true for SARS-CoV-2 but potentially for severe influenza as well.”

“An accurate diagnosis of suspected pneumonia allows clinicians to safely avoid or use narrow spectrum antibiotics for many patients,” Dr Wunderink added.  “While multiple interventions impact mortality in these critically ill patients, the low mortality in our study with more limited antibiotic treatment suggests that our approach was safe.”

Source: American Thoracic Society

Categories : COVIDTags :

Some Cognitive Abilities Improve With Age

On By ModernMedia
Image by Mar Lezhava on Unsplash

While it has long been held that all cognitive abilities decline with age, new research shows that some of these abilities can actually improve over a lifetime.

The findings, published in Nature Human Behavior, show that two key brain functions, focusing and attending to new information, can in fact improve in older individuals. These functions underlie key aspects of cognition including memory, decision making, and self-control, and even navigation, math, language and reading.

“These results are amazing, and have important consequences for how we should view aging,” said senior investigator, Michael T Ullman, PhD, a professor in the Department of Neuroscience and director of Georgetown’s Brain and Language Lab.

“People have widely assumed that attention and executive functions decline with age, despite intriguing hints from some smaller-scale studies that raised questions about these assumptions,” he said. “But the results from our large study indicate that critical elements of these abilities actually improve during aging, likely because we simply practice these skills throughout our life.”

“This is all the more important because of the rapidly aging population, both in the U.S. and around the world,” Ullman said, adding that with further research, it may be possible to deliberately improve these skills to protect against cognitive decline.

The research team explored three separate components of attention and executive function in a group of 702 participants aged 58 to 98. This age range was chosen since this is when cognition often changes the most during aging.

The components they studied are the brain networks involved in alerting, orienting and executive inhibition. Each has different characteristics and relies on different brain areas and different neurochemicals and genes. Therefore, Ullman and Veríssimo reasoned, the networks may also show different aging patterns.

Alerting is characterised by a state of enhanced vigilance and preparedness, while orienting involves shifting brain resources to a particular location in space. The executive network inhibits distracting or conflicting information, allowing us to focus on what’s important.

“We use all three processes constantly,” Veríssimo explains. “For example, when you are driving a car, alerting is your increased preparedness when you approach an intersection. Orienting occurs when you shift your attention to an unexpected movement, such as a pedestrian. And executive function allows you to inhibit distractions such as birds or billboards so you can stay focused on driving.”

Surprisingly, only alerting abilities declined with age while both orienting and executive inhibition actually improved.

The researchers hypothesis is that because orienting and inhibition are simply skills that allow selective attention, these skills can improve with lifelong practice. Ullman and Veríssimo suggest that these gains can be large enough to outweigh the underlying neural declines. Alerting declines, they believe, because this basic state of vigilance and preparedness cannot improve with practice.  
“Because of the relatively large number of participants, and because we ruled out numerous alternative explanations, the findings should be reliable and so may apply quite broadly,” Veríssimo said, adding that “because orienting and inhibitory skills underlie numerous behaviors, the results have wide-ranging implications.”

“The findings not only change our view of how aging affects the mind, but may also lead to clinical improvements, including for patients with aging disorders such as Alzheimer’s disease,” said Ullman. 

Source: Georgetown University Medical Center