A healthy lifestyle has important benefits, but weight alone might not give an adequate picture of someone’s health, say experts
Source: Pixabay CC0
Focusing solely on achieving weight loss for people with a high body mass index (BMI) may do more harm than good, argue experts in The BMJ.
Dr Juan Franco and colleagues say, on average, people with high weight will not be able to sustain a clinically relevant weight loss with lifestyle interventions, while the potential harms of weight loss interventions, including the reinforcement of weight stigma, are still unclear.
They stress that a healthy lifestyle has important benefits, but that weight alone might not give an adequate picture of someone’s health, and say doctors should provide high quality, evidence based care reflecting individual preferences and needs, regardless of weight.
Lifestyle interventions that focus on restricting an individual’s energy intake and increasing their physical activity levels have for many decades been the mainstay recommendation to reduce weight in people with obesity, explain the authors.
However, rigorous evidence has indicated that these lifestyle interventions are largely ineffective in providing sustained long term weight loss and reducing cardiovascular events (eg, heart attacks and strokes) or death.
Even though a healthy lifestyle provides important benefits, acknowledging that weight alone might not give an adequate picture of someone’s health, and recognising the limitations of lifestyle interventions for weight loss, could pave the way for more effective and patient centred care, they say.
Focusing on weight loss might also contribute to societal weight bias – negative attitudes, assumptions, and judgments about people based on their weight – which may not only have adverse effects on mental health but may also be associated with disordered eating, the adoption of unhealthy habits, and weight gain, they add.
They point out that recent clinical guidelines reflect the growing recognition that weight is an inadequate measure of health, and alternative approaches, such as Health at Every Size (HAES), acknowledge that good health can be achieved regardless of weight loss and have shown promising results in improving eating behaviours.
While these approaches should be evaluated in large clinical trials, doctors can learn from them to provide better and more compassionate care for patients with larger bodies, they suggest.
“Doctors should be prepared to inform individuals seeking weight loss about the potential benefits and harms of interventions and minimise the risk of developing eating disorders and long term impacts on metabolism,” they write. “Such a patient centred approach is likely to provide better care by aligning with patient preferences and circumstances while also reducing weight bias.”
They conclude: “Doctors’ advice about healthy eating and physical activity is still relevant as it may result in better health. The main goal is to offer good care irrespective of weight, which means not caring less but rather discussing benefits, harms, and what is important to the patient.”
Scientists have produced the first detailed characterisation of the changes that weight loss causes in human fat tissue by analysing hundreds of thousands of cells. They found a range of positive effects, including clearing out of damaged, ageing cells and increased metabolism of harmful fats.
The researchers say the findings help to better understand how weight loss leads to health improvements at a molecular level. In the future this could help to inform the development of therapies for diseases such as type 2 diabetes.
The study
The study, published in Nature, compared samples of fat tissue from healthy weight individuals with samples from people with severe obesity, meaning a BMI over 35, undergoing bariatric weight loss surgery.
The weight loss group had fat samples taken during surgery and more than five months after surgery, at which point they had lost an average of 25kg.
Lipid recycling
The researchers, who were from the Medical Research Council (MRC) Laboratory of Medical Sciences and Imperial College London, analysed gene expression in more than 170,000 cells that made up the fat tissue samples, from 70 people.
They unexpectedly found that weight loss triggers the breakdown and recycling of fats called lipids.
This recycling process could be responsible for burning energy and reversing the harmful build-up of lipids in other organs like the liver and pancreas.
The researchers say that further study will be needed to establish if lipid recycling is linked to the positive effects of weight loss on health, such as remission of type 2 diabetes.
Senescent cells
They also found that the weight loss cleared out senescent cells, which are ageing and damaged cells that accumulate in all tissues.
The senescent cells cause harm because they no longer function properly and release signals that lead to tissue inflammation and scarring.
Immune system
In contrast, the researchers found that weight loss did not improve the effects of obesity on certain aspects of the immune system.
They found that inflammatory immune cells, which infiltrated the fat of people with obesity, did not fully recover even after weight loss.
This type of inflammatory cell memory could be harmful in the long term if people regain weight.
Detailed map of what drives health benefits
Dr William Scott, from the MRC Laboratory of Medical Sciences and from Imperial College London, who led the study, said:
We’ve known for a long time that weight loss is one of the best ways to treat the complications of obesity, such as diabetes, but we haven’t fully understood why. This study provides a detailed map of what may actually be driving some of these health benefits at a tissue and cellular level.
Fat tissues have many underappreciated health impacts, including on blood sugar levels, body temperature, hormones that control appetite, and even reproductive health.
We hope that new information from studies like ours will start to pave the way for developing better treatments for diabetes and other health problems caused by excess body fat.
In the US, drugs like semaglutide are used by over 15 million adults in the U.S., or 4.5% of the population for diabetes and also weight loss. Despite their effectiveness, they have drawbacks. Their effect may not last after discontinuing use, and side effects including osteoporosis and muscle loss have raised concerns about long-term harms. They also induce nausea, which can make it difficult to stay the course of treatment.
Now Tufts researchers led by Professor Krishna Kumar, have designed a new, next-generation compound with hopes that it could be more effective with fewer side effects, which they report in a paper in the Journal of the American Chemical Society.
While weight loss drugs currently on the market and in development target one, two, or even three hormone receptors related to glucose metabolism and the desire to eat, the Tufts team has identified a fourth target that could potentially further enhance the control strategy.
“Obesity is linked to over 180 different disease conditions, including cancer, cardiovascular disease, osteoarthritis, liver disease, and type 2 diabetes, and affects over 650 million people worldwide,” said Kumar. “What drives us is the idea that we can design a single drug to treat obesity and simultaneously mitigate the risk of developing a long list of health problems plaguing society.”
How the Drugs Work
After a meal, the hormone glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) is released to help stimulate the production of insulin and the uptake of glucose in muscle and other tissues. With the cells now loaded with fuel, the level of glucose in the blood returns to normal. Semaglutide uses GLP-1 with slight modifications to increase its availability in the bloodstream. Its success in controlling blood glucose has prompted the American Diabetes Association to recommend it and other GLP-1-based drugs as the new first line injectable treatments for diabetes, ahead of insulin.
But GLP-1 also acts directly on the brain, prompting satiety after a meal, and it slows down the rate at which stomach contents are emptied into the intestines, evening out the release of nutrients and glucose into the bloodstream. That’s why it has also become extremely popular as a weight loss treatment.
It’s still not a perfect drug strategy for weight loss, though. “The biggest problem with GLP-1 drugs is that they have to be injected once a week, and they can induce a very strong feeling of nausea,” said Kumar. “As much as 40% of people using these drugs give up after the first month.”
A second hormone released after eating is glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide (GIP). It also makes us feel full after a meal. GIP looks a lot like GLP-1, so rather than administer two drugs, researchers created one peptide that incorporates structural elements of both – what’s called in drug development a chimera. That drug, tirzepatide, has the added benefit of significantly reducing nausea. As a more tolerable treatment, it may overtake semaglutide in the weight loss market.
“And then there is a third hormone, glucagon,” said Kumar. “Paradoxically, it actually increases blood glucose, but at the same time increases the expenditure of energy in cells of the body, raises body temperature, and suppresses appetite.” By adding glucagon to the mix, GLP-1 and GIP end up neutralizing its glucose-enhancing effect, leaving the remaining functionalities of all three hormones working together to enhance weight loss.
Glucagon is also similar in structure to GLP-1 and GIP, so drug developers created a single chimera peptide that incorporates elements of all three hormones, which can be recognised by their three separate receptors. That drug, called retatrudide, is currently in clinical trials that indicate even greater achievable weight loss (up to 24%) compared to the original GLP-1 drugs (6-15%).
Going for the Weight Loss Gold Standard with a Fourth Target
“The goal that people are trying to shoot for is bariatric surgery,” said Kumar. That’s a surgical procedure significantly reducing the size of the stomach, which can achieve long-lasting weight loss up to 30%. “For individuals with persistent obesity and potential deadly associated conditions, it becomes a necessary but invasive treatment.”
Current injectable weight loss drugs still fall short of that gold standard, so the Tufts chemists are focused on a drug redesign that could match the 30% weight loss outcome.
“There is one more hormone we wanted to bring in to complete a weight control quartet,” said Tristan Dinsmore, a graduate student in the Kumar lab and the lead author of the study. “It’s called peptide YY (PYY). This molecule is also secreted by the gut after we eat a meal, and its job is to reduce appetite and slow the process of emptying food from the stomach, but via different mechanisms than either GLP-1 or GIP. It may also be involved in directly ‘burning off’ fat.”
PYY is from a separate and structurally unrelated class of hormones than the first three, so blending its structure into a chimeric peptide that also mimics GLP-1, GIP, and glucagon was not easy. Instead, the Tufts team was able to join two peptide segments end-to-end, creating a new ‘tetra-functional’ clinical candidate.
“One of the limitations of the current drugs is that individual variation, possibly including how people express target receptors or respond to their corresponding hormones, can lead to lesser than desired weight loss outcomes in many patients,” said Martin Beinborn, visiting scholar in the Department of Chemistry. “By hitting four different hormone receptors at the same time, we hope to improve the chances of averaging out such variation toward the goal of achieving greater and more consistent overall effectiveness.”
“A second issue is that patients tend to regain weight after discontinuing currently available GLP-1 related drugs,” said Beinborn, who notes that lifestyle changes should ideally be a complement to medication treatment. This two-pronged approach will not only support reaching and keeping one’s target weight, but may also help preserve bone and muscle mass.
“Recent studies indicate that weight rebound after drug discontinuation is delayed with the newer, more effective GLP-1 mimetics,” he said. “Extending from this observation, one may speculate that multi-chimeras along the lines of the one we discovered could get us closer to the bariatric surgery standard of lasting weight loss.”
Losing weight via lifestyle adjustments can deliver significant long-term health benefits, without the need for surgery or anti-obesity drugs. Alongside preventing diabetes, it can help ward off chronic conditions including arterial and pulmonary diseases as well as cancers.
A University of Helsinki study tracked 23 000 individuals from Finland and the UK, aged 30 to 50 at the outset, over a period of 12 to 35 years. Health benefits were found in overweight men and women who lost an average of 6.5% of their body weight in early middle age and maintained it throughout the 12–35-year follow-up period. Weight maintenance is crucial.
“The benefits of lifestyle-based weight management are widely discussed even though studies have found it surprisingly difficult to demonstrate health benefits beyond the prevention of diabetes,” notes Professor Timo Strandberg.
The study he led is now filling this gap.
“I hope the findings will inspire people to see that lifestyle changes can lead to major health improvements and a longer life. This is particularly important today as more people are overweight than when the collection of our research data began 35 years ago.”
The study also supports the view that, for optimal health, a lifelong body mass index (BMI) under 25 is ideal.
The study was published in JAMA Network Open, the open-access journal of the American Medical Association.
Kris Jenner’s “new face” has everyone talking – and it’s widely speculated to be the result of a deep plane facelift, a procedure now dubbed the gold standard in facial rejuvenation. Let’s not even get into how Khanyi Mbau’s face broke the internet. The demand for natural-looking, sophisticated facial transformations has reached an all-time high, both globally and here in South Africa.
A global weight loss boom, fuelled by miracle diabetes drugs, has led to an unexpected side effect: the ‘O weight loss face’, marked by hollowed cheeks, sagging jowls, and prematurely aged skin. In turn, this phenomenon has sparked a significant rise in demand for advanced facial rejuvenation, and particularly the deep plane facelift – what experts term ‘the facelift that lifts where it matters most’.
“One of the most common complaints I hear from patients is, ‘I finally have the body I wanted, but my face looks 10 years older,’” says Professor Chrysis Sofianos, one of South Africa’s leading plastic surgeons and experts in deep plane facelifts.
The Gauteng-based specialist notes that he has seen a meteoric increase in consultations from patients seeking to reverse the facial deflation and laxity caused by rapid weight loss.
“This is just one instance where the deep plane facelift truly shines, as it restores natural facial harmony by lifting and repositioning deep tissues, not just tightening the skin. By addressing the deeper structural changes caused by significant weight loss, this approach delivers far more natural outcomes and a timeless look.
The Facelift No One Can See
What sets the deep plane facelift apart? Unlike traditional facelifts that only address the skin’s surface, the deep plane technique lifts beneath the superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS) layer of tissue to reposition and support the foundational structures of the face. This approach not only rejuvenates the face more effectively than other techniques, but also avoids the tell-tale ‘pulled’ look, offering a more subtle, organic-looking transformation.
Professor Sofianos further enhances his results with the Vertical Restore method, lifting facial tissues vertically – in harmony with the way gravity naturally impacts the face over time. This technique provides holistic rejuvenation of the midface, jawline, neck, and brow, with results that restore youthful contours and expressions.
“Only a handful of surgeons currently offer this breakthrough procedure, and I can confidently state that the deep plane facelift is the gold standard for natural, long-lasting revitalisation.”
According to Professor Sofianos, deep plane facelifts offer several major advantages compared to conventional facelifts:
Superior, long-lasting results: By repositioning deeper facial structures rather than merely tightening the skin, the deep plane facelift offers longer-lasting, more authentic outcomes.
Natural look and movement: The technique avoids excessive skin tension, ensuring the face remains expressive and vibrant – even in motion.
Comprehensive rejuvenation: From sagging jowls and hollow cheeks to neck laxity, the deep plane facelift addresses multiple problem areas in one single, unified procedure.
The Ultimate One-Stop Shop for Aesthetic Excellence and Care
Professor Sofianos’s practice is not only a leader in surgical innovation but also a complete one-stop destination for all aesthetic needs. His clinic offers a full suite of surgical and non-surgical procedures – from advanced facial surgeries to injectables, laser treatments, skin rejuvenation, and body contouring. Each treatment is bespoke and delivered with meticulous care to ensure natural, balanced, and long-lasting results.
What truly sets Professor Sofianos apart, however, is his absolute commitment to patient care. Every facelift is supported by a holistic pre- and post-operative care programme, designed to optimise recovery and results.
A signature component of this is the integration of hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT), which is included as standard in his facelift packages. HBOT begins around 7–10 days after surgery, dramatically improving oxygen delivery to tissues, speeding up wound healing, reducing bruising and swelling, and significantly shortening overall healing time.
As a result of these additional post-surgical interventions, the typical recovery period is two to three weeks, with most patients able to resume social activities within a month. With comprehensive aftercare – including HBOT and nutrient therapies – patients benefit from accelerated healing and refined results that continue to improve for several months post-surgery.
“The success of a procedure isn’t just about the surgery itself, but about guiding patients through a complete journey from start to finish,” he explains. “My patients receive comprehensive, full-spectrum care – including pre-operative preparation, expert surgical techniques, post-operative hyperbaric therapy, scar management, and continuous follow-ups. It’s this level of commitment that ensures optimal outcomes, supporting patients through every step of their transformation and helping them feel comfortable and secure throughout.”
A Lasting Solution for Facial Rejuvenation in the Weight Loss Era
As weight loss medications continue to help patients address issues with weight management and obesity, experts predict that the demand for facial rejuvenation will only rise.
“This trend has created both challenges and opportunities for plastic surgeons, and in many ways is reshaping our field in real time. The good news for patients is that we’re at the beginning of a new chapter in aesthetic medicine – where a combination of sophisticated surgical techniques and aftercare procedures are helping people achieve what was once thought impossible: natural-looking transformations that truly turn back the clock.”
For those seeking to restore their youthful appearance with confidence and discretion, the deep plane facelift offers an unmatched, cutting-edge solution – delivered with precision, artistry, and unparalleled care by Professor Chrysis Sofianos and his dedicated team.
Study links higher body mass index at various ages across adulthood with greater risks of developing different types of kidney cancer.
Photo by I Yunmai on Unsplash
Excess weight in mid-life is a known risk factor for kidney cancer, but new research indicates that weight patterns throughout life may also affect an individual’s likelihood of developing this malignancy. The findings are published by Wiley online in CANCER, a peer-reviewed journal of the American Cancer Society.
To assess weight patterns and their associations with kidney cancer and its different subtypes, investigators analysed data from 204 364 individuals from the NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study, including body mass index (BMI) data when participants entered the study (an average age of 61.6 years), and prior BMI recordings at 18, 35, and 50 years of age. The team noted that there were 1,425 cases of kidney cancer, or renal cell carcinoma (RCC), among the study’s participants, with 583 having aggressive RCC and 339 having fatal RCC. The researchers also recorded the different subtypes of RCC, including clear cell RCC (541 patients), papillary RCC (146 patients), and chromophobe RCC (64 patients).
Higher BMI at any of the ages assessed was linked with higher risks of overall RCC and all subtypes (except chromophobe RCC), with a 10-40% higher risk for each 5-unit increase in BMI. Similar increased risks were linked to weight gain during adulthood that resulted in overweight or obesity, compared with maintaining normal BMI.
Also, long-term excess weight was associated with higher risks of overall RCC, aggressive RCC, fatal RCC, and clear cell RCC, but not papillary RCC and chromophobe RCC. Weight loss in which BMI was reduced by at least 10%, particularly later in life, was associated with a lower risk of RCC. Specifically, weight loss from age 18–35 years and after age 50 years was associated with 21% and 28% reductions in RCC incidence, respectively.
“These findings emphasise that maintaining a healthy weight across one’s lifetime is important for reducing RCC risk. More importantly, weight loss, even later in life, may offer protective benefits,” said lead author Zhengyi Deng, PhD, of Stanford University School of Medicine. “We should support initiatives that promote healthy weight maintenance and weight loss strategies. Some of these include lifestyle interventions, weight-loss programs, and emerging medical treatments for obesity; however, individuals should consult with their healthcare providers prior to initiation of any plan.”
A recent commentary published in The Lancet highlights the critical importance of skeletal muscle mass in the context of medically induced weight loss, particularly with the widespread use of GLP-1 receptor agonists. These medications, celebrated for their effectiveness in treating obesity, have raised concerns regarding the potential for substantial muscle loss as part of the weight loss process.
Dr Steven Heymsfield, professor of metabolism and body composition, and Dr M. Cristina Gonzalez, adjunct professor in metabolism-body composition, both of Pennington Biomedical Research Center joined colleagues Dr Carla Prado of the University of Alberta, and Dr Stuart Phillips of McMaster University on authoring the commentary, titled “Muscle Matters: The Effects of Medically Induced Weight Loss on Skeletal Muscle.”
The authors emphasise that muscle loss, as measured by decreases in fat-free mass, can account for 25 to 39% of total weight lost over a period of 36 to 72 weeks. This rate of muscle decline is significantly higher than what is typically observed with non-pharmacological caloric restriction or normal aging and could lead to unintended negative health consequences.
Despite the promising metabolic benefits associated with GLP-1 receptor agonists, including improvements in fat-to-fat-free tissue ratios, the potential adverse effects of muscle loss are gaining attention. Skeletal muscle plays critical roles not only in physical strength and function but also in metabolic health and immune system regulation.
A decline in muscle mass has been linked to decreased immunity, increased risk of infections, poor glucose regulation, and other health risks. The authors suggest that muscle loss due to weight reduction may exacerbate conditions like sarcopenic obesity, which is prevalent among individuals with obesity and contributes to poorer health outcomes, including cardiovascular disease and higher mortality rates.
While the short-term effects of muscle loss on physical strength and function remain unclear, the commentary calls for future research to explore how reductions in muscle mass might improve muscle composition and quality. The authors stress the need for a multimodal approach to weight loss treatment, combining GLP-1 receptor agonists with exercise and nutritional interventions to preserve muscle mass.
“We have to be mindful of the side effects that we are seeing with the new weight loss medications, such as a person eating less while on the medications and not getting the appropriate amount of dietary vitamins and minerals,” Dr Heymsfield said. “Also, when a person loses weight, they are not only losing fat, they also lose muscle. We are looking at how that muscle loss can be better managed with consumption of an adequate amount of protein along with an optimum amount of exercise.”
This evolving conversation underscores the importance of ensuring that weight loss interventions promote overall health, including muscle preservation, as part of a comprehensive strategy for treating obesity.
Weight loss medication has taken the world by storm and helped many overweight people. But for some, significant weight loss also comes with a loss of muscle mass and can lead to an increased risk of osteoporosis.
New research now suggests that the monoclonal antibody drug bimagrumab may be able to alleviate some of this risk, says PhD student Frederik Duch Bromer and postdoc Andreas Lodberg from the Department of Biomedicine at Aarhus University, who are behind the study published in the Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle.
“We are the first to study how certain drugs affect bones, and the results show that bimagrumab can increase the amount of bone tissue while building muscle mass, and this could be very important for the many people currently taking weight loss medication.”
Bimagrumab was originally developed to treat muscle loss and dysfunction, but since then, it has beome apparent that it also has a fat “burning” component to it. So, if approved, it could be part of a second-generation weight loss drug on the market.
Therefore, it’s relevant to research how this particular patient group reacts to the drug,” says Andreas Lodberg.
“An estimated two billion people will be categorised as overweight by 2035, so it’s also important that we research the drugs that come on the market for this particular patient group in order to better understand their long-term impact on the body.”
Osteoporosis can prove costly for patients and society
Patients on weight loss medication often have a history of weight fluctuation, which can contribute to the development of osteoporosis. Brittle bones increase the risk of serious fractures, and this is costly for both patients and society.
Therefore, the research results could be good news for patients on weight loss medication. And according to Frederik Duch Bromer, the study shows that bimagrumab not only counteracts the breakdown of bone and muscle tissue, it actually promotes the build-up of both.
“Bimagrumab slightly increases the calcium content in bones and promotes the formation of new bone in what we call the shell (cortex) of the long bones. We also saw a significant build-up of bone tissue in the area around the femoral head, which is typically where many older people incur fractures.”
According to Frederik Duch Bromer, the results also showed that bimagrumab has no effect on the blood. Similar drugs have previously been shown to increase red blood cell production, increasing the risk of blood clots.
The study is based on mice with both osteoporosis and reduced muscle mass, and the drug is now being tested in several phase 2 clinical trials. Andreas Lodberg emphasises that more research is needed.
“Our study shows that bimagrumab has a positive effect in many areas, but we also have indications that the drug may have other side effects, and we’ll now investigate this further to get a clearer picture of the implications of using the drug for patients.”
Andreas Lodberg and Frederik Duch Bromer hope to be able to continue with further research to investigate both the positive results and possible side effects.
Participants on a self-directed dietary education program who had the greatest success at losing weight across a 25-month period consumed greater amounts of protein and fibre, found a study published in Obesity Science and Practice. Personalisation and flexibility also were key in creating plans that dieters could adhere to over time.
At the one-year mark, successful dieters (41% of participants) had lost 12.9% of their body weight, compared with the remainder of the study sample, who lost slightly more than 2% of their starting weight.
The dieters were participants in the Individualised Diet Improvement Program, which uses data visualisation tools and intensive dietary education sessions to increase dieters’ knowledge of key nutrients, enabling them to create a personalised, safe and effective weight-loss plan, said Manabu T. Nakamura, a professor of nutrition at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign and the leader of the research.
“Flexibility and personalisation are key in creating programs that optimise dieters’ success at losing weight and keeping it off,” Nakamura said. “Sustainable dietary change, which varies from person to person, must be achieved to maintain a healthy weight. The iDip approach allows participants to experiment with various dietary iterations, and the knowledge and skills they develop while losing weight serve as the foundation for sustainable maintenance.”
The pillars of iDip are increasing protein and fibre consumption along with consuming 1500 calories or less daily.
Based on the dietary guidelines issued by the Institutes of Medicine, the iDip team created a one-of-a-kind, two-dimensional quantitative data visualisation tool that plots foods’ protein and fibre densities per calorie and provides a target range for each meal. Starting with foods they habitually ate, the dieters created an individualised plan, increasing their protein intake to about 80g and their fibre intake to about 20g daily.
In tracking the participants’ eating habits and their weights with Wi-Fi enabled scales, the team found strong inverse correlations between the percentages of fibre and protein eaten and dieters’ weight loss.
“The research strongly suggests that increasing protein and fibre intake while simultaneously reducing calories is required to optimise the safety and efficacy of weight loss diets,” said first author and U. of I. alumna Mindy H. Lee, a then-graduate student and registered dietitian-nutritionist for the iDip program.
Nakamura said the preservation of lean mass is very important while losing weight, especially when using weight-loss drugs.
“Recently, the popularity of injectable weight loss medications has been increasing,” Nakamura said. “However, using these medications when food intake is strongly limited will cause serious side effects of muscle and bone loss unless protein intake is increased during weight loss.”
A total of 22 people who enrolled in the program completed it, including nine men and 13 women. Most of the dieters were between the ages of 30–64. Participants reported they had made two or more prior attempts to lose weight. They also had a variety of comorbidities – 54% had high cholesterol, 50% had skeletal problems and 36% had hypertension and/or sleep apnoea. Additionally, the dieters reported diagnoses of diabetes, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, cancer and depression, according to the study.
The seven dieters who reported they had been diagnosed with depression lost significantly less weight: about 2.4% of their starting weight compared with those without depression, who lost 8.39% of their initial weight. The team found that weight loss did not differ significantly among participants with other comorbidities, or between younger and older participants or between men and women.
Body composition analysis indicated that dieters maintained their lean body mass, losing an average of 7.1kg of fat mass and minimal muscle mass at the six-month interval. Among those who lost greater than 5% of their starting weight, 78% of the weight they lost was fat, according to the study.
Overall, the participants reduced their fat mass from an average of 42.6kg at the beginning of the program to 35.7kg at the 15-month mark. Likewise, the dieters reduced their waists by about 7cm at six months and by a total of 9cm at 15 months, the team found.
In tracking dieters’ protein and fibre intake, the team found a strong correlation between protein and fibre consumption and weight loss at three months and 12 months.
“The strong correlation suggests that participants who were able to develop sustainable dietary changes within the first three months kept losing weight in the subsequent months, whereas those who had difficulty implementing sustainable dietary patterns early on rarely succeeded in changing their diet in the later months,” Nakamura said.
The team hypothesised that this correlation could also have been associated with some dieters’ early weight loss success, which may have bolstered their motivation and adherence to their program.
In a survey-based study, UK dietitians exhibited significant weight stigma, both towards themselves and towards others.
The study in the Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics involved an online survey completed in 2022 by 402 registered dietitians aged 20–70 years old. Most respondents reported personally experiencing weight stigma prior to (51%) and after becoming (59.7%) registered dieticians, and nearly a quarter (21.1%) felt that their weight influenced their own ability to perform as a dietitian.
Weight stigma was experienced across the weight spectrum. Participants reported explicit (or conscious) weight bias attitudes, moderate beliefs that obesity is controllable, and implicit (or unconscious) anti-fat bias.
“The study highlights the need to address weight stigma and its implications within the dietetic profession,” the authors wrote.
