Tag: respiratory syncytial virus

Preterm Births Concern Raised Over New Maternal RSV Vaccine

Experts have called for further scrutiny of a new Pfizer vaccine given during pregnancy to prevent respiratory infection in infants, after trials of a similar GSK vaccine were stopped after increased preterm birth and infant deaths. Pfizer says its vaccine is safe and effective, but experts contacted as part of an investigation published by The BMJ say that Pfizer’s trial data should be reviewed in light of the trend for preterm births seen in GSK’s trial.

Pfizer’s maternal RSV vaccine aims to protect infants from severe illness caused by the respiratory syncytial virus (RSV). RSV is very common but can be fatal, especially in young children. In 2019, an estimated 3.6% of all deaths worldwide in children aged 1-6 months were due to RSV, with 97% of these deaths occurring in low and middle income countries.

The vaccine has not yet been approved for use, but a decision by the US Food and Drug Administration is expected by August. The European Medicines Agency is also set to make a decision about the vaccine later this year.

In February 2022, GSK halted vaccination in its phase 3 trials of its maternal RSV vaccine after finding an increased risk of preterm birth in vaccinated mothers, mainly in low and middle income countries.

Pfizer published the results of an interim analysis of its phase 3 trial last month, saying that the vaccine was effective against medically attended severe RSV in children and that no safety concerns were identified.

And while the difference in preterm births in the Pfizer trials was not statistically significant, the results have raised concerns about a possible increase in preterm births, and now experts are calling for further analyses of the data and post-approval monitoring of the vaccine should the FDA approve it.

“My interpretation of all these data is that there may be a safety signal for preterm births that should be followed up on,” said Klaus Überla, director of the Virological Institute of the University Hospital Erlangen and member of the RSV working group of the Standing Committee on Vaccination (STIKO), which develops national recommendations for the use of licensed vaccines in Germany. 

And a scientist at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) said the Pfizer data should be analysed using more sensitive measures such as average birth weight and subgroup analyses to detect possible signals.

Meanwhile, Cody Meissner, professor of paediatrics and medicine at the Dartmouth Geisel School of Medicine and consultant in the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)’s maternal RSV working group, predicts that possible adverse effects such as premature births will be “closely monitored” in assessment programs by FDA and CDC.  “We need a safe vaccine,” he added.

Pfizer did not respond when asked about a possible increase in preterm births associated with its vaccine, but told The BMJ that “no imbalance of neonatal deaths was observed” in its phase 3 trial. 

In a linked editorial, researchers point to challenges for RSV vaccine development and the main approaches to protection currently being pursued. 

They argue that, while the burden of illness caused by RSV is substantial worldwide, it is particularly important that new vaccines and other prevention strategies are available to infants in low and middle income countries, where the greatest illness and deaths occur.

And they say further research is urgently needed “to identify the best prevention strategies for low and middle income countries, where affordability is paramount and timing of administration is complicated by the lack of predictable seasonal RSV epidemics.”

Source: EurekAlert!

New Vaccine Will Save Thousands of Children from Dying of Pneumonia

Scanning electron micrograph of human respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) virions (colourised blue) and labelled with anti-RSV F protein/gold antibodies (colourised yellow) shedding from the surface of human lung epithelial A549 cells. Credit: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health (NIH)

By James Stent for GroundUp

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a dangerous early childhood viral infection, but results of a vaccine trial promise to change things radically.

A new study published in the New England Journal of Medicine, the world’s most prestigious medical journal, on 5 April that examined the effect of an RSV vaccine on pregnant women found that it reduced the risk of severe lower respiratory tract infections in newborns by 82%.

RSV is the most common cause of acute lower respiratory infection – or pneumonia – in infants. Globally, it was responsible for just over 100,000 deaths (with a lower bound of 84,000 deaths and an upper bound of 126,000 deaths) of children under five in 2019. Of these deaths 45% were infants (younger than six months), and nearly all deaths occurred in lower income countries (half in Africa alone). In an article in Spotlight in June 2022, Professor Cheryl Cohen, head of the Centre for Respiratory Diseases and Meningitis at the National Institute for Communicable Diseases (NICD), said that, pre-COVID, RSV led to 44 615 hospitalisations and 490 deaths in children under five each year in South Africa.

South Africa is currently experiencing an RSV epidemic, with 301 cases detected this year, according to the NICD surveillance programme.

RSV causes cold-like symptoms, but can lead to severe symptoms like pneumonia. At present, there is no licensed RSV vaccine, though the virus was first identified in the 1960s.

The study was a phase three, double-blind trial (which compares a new treatment to standard care, and leads the way to regulatory approval and production) conducted in 18 countries, led by Beate Kampmann, Professor of Paediatric Infection and Immunity at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Shabir Madhi, Dean of the Faculty of Health Sciences and Professor of Vaccinology at the University of the Witwatersrand, and Iona Munjal, Director of Clinical Research & Development at Pfizer. It builds on earlier work by Madhi and others.

Women who were between 24 and 36 weeks pregnant were given an injection of a protein–based vaccine (RSVpreF) and a placebo. Pregnant women can passively transfer their immunity to viruses and diseases to their foetuses in utero.

They were then monitored to see if they suffered a severe RSV-associated lower respiratory tract illness that required medical attention, and if their newborns required medical attention for RSV-associated lower respiratory tract illness up to six months after birth.

A total of 7,358 women participated across the two trial groups, and 7,128 babies were monitored, and no safety concerns were identified over the course of the trial.

In November last year, Pfizer announced that it planned to submit a licence application to the US Food and Drug Administration after trials showed that the vaccine was highly effective at reducing severe RSV cases in the first 90 days of an infant’s life.

In a Twitter thread announcing the results, Madhi said that the next challenge would be to ensure that the vaccine is licensed across lower income countries, where most infant RSV deaths occur. Madhi said that there is a “moral responsibility on pharma to licence [the RSV] vaccine in LMIC [Lower and Middle Income Countries] at [an] affordable price.” Governments in poorer countries, “need to act to protect children in their counties by funding and deploying the vaccine timeously,” he said.

Madhi also informed GroundUp that coincidentally in the same issue of the New England Journal of Medicine, a medicine called nirsevimab was found to protect infants against RSV-associated hospitalisation and severe lower respiratory tract infections. Madhi and his team at Wits also participated in this trial.

This medicine is “administered as a single dose at the onset of RSV season,” Madhi explained. “The two approaches [the vaccine and nirsevimab] will be complementary.”

Republished from GroundUp under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Source: GroundUp

Scientists Witness the Creation of a Hybrid Virus

In a world first, scientists have witnessed the fusion two viruses, influenza A virus (IAV) and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), forming a single, hybrid virus particle (HVP). The discovery was published in Nature Microbiology.

Viruses often share tropism for the same system, such as respiratory viruses preferentially infecting the respiratory system. Coinfections by more than one virus represent between ~10–30% of all respiratory viral infections and are common among children. The clinical impact of viral coinfections is unclear: while some studies indicate that coinfections do not alter the outcome of disease, others report increased incidence of viral pneumonia.

Though evidence suggests virus–virus interactions play an important role in virus dynamics and transmission, viruses are typically studied in isolation. Recent work showed that interactions among respiratory viruses occur and have impacts at multiple levels, from populations, to individuals and tissues. However, studies characterising direct virus–virus interactions within cells are scarce. Here we report previously unknown interactions between IAV and RSV, two clinically important respiratory viruses that belong to different taxonomical families.

To investigate virus–virus interactions, the researchers infected human lung cells with both influenza A virus (IAV) and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV). Using super-resolution microscopy, live-cell imaging, scanning electron microscopy and cryo-electron tomography, the researchers found extracellular and membrane-associated filamentous structures consistent with hybrid viral particles (HVPs).

The researchers found that HVPs harbour surface glycoproteins and ribonucleoproteins of IAV and RSV. HVPs use the RSV fusion glycoprotein to evade anti-IAV neutralising antibodies and infect and spread among cells lacking IAV receptors. Finally, we show that IAV and RSV coinfection in primary cells of the bronchial epithelium results in viral proteins from both viruses latching on together at the apical cell surface.

“Our observations define a previously unknown interaction between respiratory viruses that might affect virus pathogenesis by expanding virus tropism and enabling immune evasion,” the researchers wrote.

“This kind of hybrid virus has never been described before,” virologist and senior author Pablo Murcia told The Guardian. “We are talking about viruses from two completely different families combining together with the genomes and the external proteins of both viruses. It is a new type of virus pathogen.”

When IAV and RSV coinfect, IAV becomes more infectious, infecting a wider array of human cells. Carrying the RSV surface proteins, IAV was able to better evade the immune system. The HVP also spread into cells lacking influenza receptors, letting it progress further down the respiratory tract.

The relationship is not mutually beneficial for the viruses as RSV loses potency. Overall though, pilfering another virus’s tools could play a role in viral pneumonia.

“RSV tends to go lower down into the lung than the seasonal flu virus, and you’re more likely to get more severe disease the further down the infection goes,” said Dr Stephen Griffin, a virologist at the University of Leeds who was not involved in the study.

“It is another reason to avoid getting infected with multiple viruses, because this [hybridisation] is likely to happen all the more if we don’t take precautions to protect our health,” he added.

The researchers also found that the combination of viruses was important; IAV did not form an effective hybrid with rhinovirus.