Tag: antibodies

Categories : ImmunologyTags :

Antibodies can Prevent Bacteria from Infiltrating Cells

On By ModernMedia
Adhesion of Bartonella henselae to human cells. B. henselae  (strain Marseille) bacteria (light blue) in an early stage infection process (30 min) to human HeLa-229 cells (red). Adhesion to host cells is mediated by specific interactions between B. henselae  surface proteins and components of the host extracellular matrix including molecules such as fibronectin or collagen. Scale bar: 8 μm.

Using Bartonella henselae bacteria, the cause of cat scratch disease, researchers have demonstrated for the first time that antibodies can prevent certain surface proteins of bacterial pathogens from entering host cells. The findings are important for the development of new drugs against highly resistant infectious agents.

Infections pose a significant threat to human health, especially when pathogens manage to colonise the organism and subsequently cause severe infections. The first step in such an infection always consists of the pathogens attaching themselves to the host cells’ surface. From here, the infections spread, resulting, for example, in infections of deeper tissue layers and organs.

A group of scientists surrounding Prof. Volkhard Kempf from Frankfurt University Hospital’s Institute of Microbiology and Hospital Hygiene has now succeeded in blocking this adhesion mechanism in a bacterium, thereby preventing the infection of host cells. For this purpose, the researchers examined the pathogen Bartonella henselae, usually causing cat scratch disease. Transmitted by cats, the disease mainly affects young children, whose symptoms include swollen and hardened lymph nodes around the site of infection, usually after a scratch or bite injury caused by infected cats.

Bartonella bacteria infect so-called endothelial cells, which line the blood vessels. Via their surface protein Bartonella adhesin A (BadA), they attach themselves to a protein (fibronectin) of the so-called “extracellular matrix,” a network of protein fibers that lie on top of the endothelial cells.

Breaking BadA

To determine which parts of the BadA protein are important in the bacterial adhesion process, the researchers equipped Bartonella bacteria with various genetically modified BadA variants, among others, and then analysed the extent to which these variants were still able to bind fibronectin. Once it was clear which BadA segments were responsible for the binding, the team produced antibodies against them, demonstrating for the first time that such antibodies can prevent infection by such bacteria.

Prof. Volkhard Kempf explains: “Bartonella henselae is not a very dangerous pathogen, and in most cases, cat scratch disease does not require any specific medical treatment. However, for us Bartonella henselae is a very important model organism for far more dangerous pathogens such as Acinetobacter baumannii, a serious pathogen that usually causes wound infection or pneumonia and often shows resistance to several last-choice antibiotics. The BadA protein of Bartonella henselae belongs to the so-called ‘trimeric autotransporter adhesins’, which are also responsible for adhesion to human cells in Acinetobacter and a number of other pathogens. A drug-induced blocking of these adhesins is therefore a promising novel and future approach to combat dangerous bacterial infections.”

The researchers published their findings in Diagnostics.

Source: Goethe University Frankfurt

Categories : COVIDTags :

New Omicron Variant Escapes Antibodies and Monoclonal Therapy

On By ModernMedia
Source: Fusion Medical Animation on Unsplash

The emerging Omicron variant BA.2.75.2 largely evades neutralising antibodies in the blood and resists several monoclonal antibody antiviral treatments, according to a study published in the journal The Lancet Infectious Diseases. The findings suggest a risk of increased COVID infections in the northern hemisphere’s winter, unless the new updated bivalent vaccines help to boost immunity in the population.

“While antibody immunity is not completely gone, BA.2.75.2 exhibited far more dramatic resistance than variants we’ve previously studied, largely driven by two mutations in the receptor binding domain of the spike protein,” said the study’s corresponding author Ben Murrell, assistant professor at the Department of Microbiology, Tumor and Cell Biology, Karolinska Institutet.

The study shows that antibodies in random serum samples from 75 blood donors in Stockholm were approximately only one-sixth as effective at neutralising BA.2.75.2 compared with the now-dominant variant BA.5. The serum samples were collected at three time points: in November 2021 before the emergence of Omicron, in April 2022 after a large wave of infections in the country, and at the end of August to early September after the BA.5 variant became dominant.

The researchers found that only one of the clinically available monoclonal antibody treatments that were tested, bebtelovimab, managed to effectively neutralise the new variant.

BA.2.75.2 is a mutated version of another Omicron variant, BA.2.75. Since it was first discovered earlier this fall, it has spread to several countries but so far represents only a minority of registered cases.

A possible increase in infections

“We now know that this is just one of a constellation of emerging variants with similar mutations that will likely come to dominate in the near future,” Ben Murrell says, adding “we should expect infections to increase this winter.”

Some questions remain. It is unclear whether these new variants will drive an increase in hospitalisation rates. Also, while current vaccines have, in general, had a protective effect against severe disease for Omicron infections, there is not yet data showing the degree to which the updated COVID vaccines provide protection from these new variants. “We expect them to be beneficial, but we don’t yet know by how much,” Ben Murrell says.

Source: Karolinska Institutet

Categories : Diseases, Syndromes and Conditions New Compounds and TreatmentsTags :

Two New Antibody Treatments for Crohn’s Disease Equally Effective

On By ModernMedia
Anatomy of the gut
Source: Pixabay CC0

In a clinical trial, two new antibody treatments for Crohn’s disease were approximately similar in effectiveness, according to findings published in The Lancet.

This allows clinicians and patients to make treatment choices based on tolerance, according to Stephen Hanauer, MD, the Clifford Joseph Barborka Professor and a co-author of the study.

“The safety and efficacy of two agents with different mechanisms of action appears to be quite comparable over one year,” said Prof Hanauer.

Crohn’s disease (CD) is a chronic, progressive inflammatory bowel disease, causing abdominal pain, weight loss and fatigue. Treatment has usually focused on alleviating symptoms to achieve clinical remission using corticosteroids or immunomodulators, but more effective treatment is still needed, according to Prof Hanauer.

‘While there are numerous therapies and mechanisms of action for drugs approved for moderate-severe Crohn’s disease there has been a therapeutic ceiling as far as outcomes are concerned, with usually less than 50% of patients in long-term remission,” Prof Hanauer explained.

Recently, several biologic agents have been approved for use. Adalimumab is a monoclonal antibody that reduces inflammatory cytokines by inhibiting tumor necrosis factor alpha. Ustekinumab is another monoclonal antibody, though the drug targets a different set of proteins: interleukin (IL) 12 and IL-23.

Researchers recruited with Crohn’s disease, randomising 191 to receive ustekinumab and 195 to adalimumab. Patients reaching clinical remission were similar between both groups: 65% of 191 patients in the ustekinumab group versus 61% of 195 in the adalimumab group. There were no deaths through one year of study, though slightly more patients in the ustekinumab group discontinued study treatment. Disease severity measures decreased similarly over the study.

Both treatment regimens resulted in clinical remission with similar toxicity profiles.

“There are numerous options for patients with moderate-severe disease. However, the key is to treat patients with an effective regimen and treat to targets as early in the course as possible since we do not have any drugs that impact on fibrosis once it occurs,” Prof Hanauer said.

Source: Northwestern University

Categories : UncategorizedTags :

Secrets of Pregnant Mothers’ ‘Super Antibodies’ Revealed

On By ModernMedia
Pregnant with ultrasound image
Source: Pixabay

Pregnant mothers have the ability to confer greater immunity to the vulnerable developing foetus with ‘super antibodies’. Now, a far-reaching study published in Nature provides a surprising explanation of how this actually works, and what it could mean for preventing death and disability from a wide range of infectious diseases.

The findings suggest the amped-up antibodies that expecting mothers produce could be mimicked to create new drugs to treat diseases as well as improved vaccines to prevent them.

“For many years, scientists believed that antibodies cannot get inside cells. They don’t have the necessary machinery. And so, infections caused by pathogens that live exclusively inside cells were thought to be invisible to antibody-based therapies,” said Sing Sing Way, MD. “Our findings show that pregnancy changes the structure of certain sugars attached to the antibodies, which allows them to protect babies from infection by a much wider range of pathogens.”

“The maternal-infant dyad is so special. It’s the intimate connection between a mother and her baby,” says John Erickson, MD, PhD, first-author of the study.

Drs Way and Erickson are both part of Cincinnati Children’s Center for Inflammation and Tolerance and the Perinatal Institute, which strives to improve outcomes for all pregnant women and their newborns.

Erickson continues, “This special connection starts when babies are in the womb and continues after birth. I love seeing the closeness between mothers and their babies in our newborn care units. This discovery paves the way for pioneering new therapies that can specifically target infections in pregnant mothers and newborns babies. I believe these findings also will have far-reaching implications for antibody-based therapies in other fields.”

How mothers make super antibodies
The new study identifies the specific change in the sugar. During pregnancy, the “acetylated” form of sialic acid (one of the sugars attached to antibodies) shifts to the “deacetylated” form. This subtle molecular shift lets immunoglobulin G (IgG) take on an expanded protective role by stimulating immunity through receptors that respond specifically to deacetylated sugars.

“This change is the light switch that allows maternal antibodies to protect babies against infection inside cells,” Dr Way said.

“Mothers always seem to know best,” Dr Erickson added.

Revved-up antibodies can be produced in the lab
The research team pinned down the key biochemical differences between antibodies in virgin mice compared to pregnant ones. They also identified the enzyme naturally expressed during pregnancy responsible for driving this transformation.

Further, the team successfully restored lost immune protection by supplying lab-grown supplies of the antibodies from healthy pregnant mice to pups born to mothers that were gene-edited to lack the ability to remove acetylation from antibodies to enhance protection.

Hundreds of monoclonal antibodies have been produced as potential treatments for various disorders, including COVID, with a variety of results.

Dr Way said this molecular alteration can be replicated to change how antibodies stimulate the immune system to fine-tune their effects. This potentially could lead to improved treatments for infections caused by other intracellular pathogens including HIV and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), a common virus that poses serious risks to infants.

Another reason to accelerate vaccine development
“We’ve known for years the many far-reaching benefits of breastfeeding,” Dr Erickson said. “One major factor is the transfer of antibodies in breastmilk.”

The study shows that nursing mothers retain the molecular switch, passing through the antibodies to their newborns.

Additionally, Dr Way says the findings underscore the importance of receiving all available vaccines for women of reproductive age – as well as the need for researchers to develop even more vaccines against infections that which are especially prominent in women during pregnancy or in newborn babies.

“The immunity needs to exist within the mother for it to be transferred to her child,” Dr Way said. “Without natural exposures or immunity primed by vaccination, when that light switch flips during pregnancy, there’s no electricity behind it.”

Source: Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center

Categories : COVID VaccinesTags :

New Vaccines Could Focus on T Cell Response – Without Antibodies

On By ModernMedia
T cell
Scanning Electron Micrograph image of a human T cell. Credit: NIH/NIAID

In a groundbreaking new study, scientists report training T cells to protect against SARS-CoV-2 even without an antibody response. This could open the way to more broadly effective vaccines.

The study’s findings appear in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Current vaccines prompt the creation of antibodies and immune cells that recognise the spike protein. However, these vaccines were developed using the spike protein from an older variant of SARS-CoV-2, reducing their effectiveness against newer variants. Researchers have found that immune cells called T cells tend to recognise parts of SARS-CoV-2 that don’t mutate rapidly. T cells coordinate the immune system’s response and kill cells that have been infected by the SARS-CoV-2 virus.

A vaccine that prompted the body to create more T cells against SARS-CoV-2 could help prevent disease caused by a wide range of variants. To explore this approach, a research team led by Dr Marulasiddappa Suresh from the University of Wisconsin studied two experimental vaccines that included compounds to specifically provoke a strong T-cell response in mice.

The team tested the vaccines’ ability to control infection and prevent severe disease caused by an earlier strain of SARS-CoV-2 as well as by the Beta variant, which is relatively resistant to antibodies raised against earlier strains.

When the researchers vaccinated the mice either either nasally or by injection, the animals developed T cells that could recognise the early SARS-CoV-2 strain and the Beta variant. The vaccines also caused the mice to develop antibodies that could neutralise the early strain. However, they failed to create antibodies that neutralised the Beta variant.

The mice were exposed to SARS-CoV-2 around 3 to 5 months after vaccination. Compared to the controls, vaccinated mice had very low levels of virus in their lungs and were protected against severe illness, which was true of infection with the Beta variant too. This showed that the vaccine provided protection against the Beta variant despite failing to produce effective antibodies against it.

To understand which T cells were providing this protection, the researchers selectively removed different types of T cells in vaccinated mice prior to infection. When they removed CD8 (killer) T cells, vaccinated mice remained well protected against the early strain, although not against the Beta variant. When they blocked CD4 T (helper) cells, levels of both the early strain and Beta variant in the lungs and severity of disease were substantially higher than in vaccinated mice that didn’t have their T cells removed.

These results suggest important roles for CD8 and CD4 T cells in controlling SARS-CoV-2 infection. Current mRNA vaccines do produce some T cells that recognize multiple variants. This may help account for part of the observed protection against severe disease from the Omicron variant. Future vaccines might be designed to specifically enhance this T cell response.

“I see the next generation of vaccines being able to provide immunity to current and future COVID variants by stimulating both broadly-neutralising antibodies and T cell immunity,” Dr Suresh predicted.

Source: National Institutes of Health

Categories : UncategorizedTags :

By Now, Nearly All South Africans Have COVID Antibodies

On By ModernMedia
South African flag with COVID theme
Image by Quicknews

The latest COVID seroprevalence survey shows that nearly every adult in South Africa has either been vaccinated or had COVID. For many, it’s both.

The study analysed blood from over 3000 blood donors. It was conducted by the South African National Blood Service, which is responsible for blood donations in eight provinces, and the Western Cape Blood Service.

The researchers estimated that by March 2022, before the fifth wave which appears to have peaked in the last few weeks, 98% of adults had some detectable antibodies, whether from COVID or from vaccination. This means that only 2% had neither been vaccinated nor been infected.

Only 10% had been vaccinated but not infected by COVID.

Read the study

(Note: The study has been published as a preprint and has not been peer-reviewed.)

What the survey tested for

Blood samples were collected and tested from 3395 consenting donors from all provinces in mid-March 2022. While blood donors are not precisely representative of the population, the researchers have argued that the study is representative enough.

This is the first time the blood services researchers have been able to look for two types of antibodies.

One test indicates if a sample has antibodies to the nucleocapsid proteins (anti-nucleocapsid antibodies). These antibodies develop if someone is infected, but won’t develop after a person receives a vaccine only (at least not those vaccines currently available in South Africa).

The other test indicates if the sample has antibodies to the spike protein (anti-spike antibodies). These antibodies develop when someone has been infected or has been vaccinated (or both).

Using these two tests together, researchers can, for the first time, evaluate the proportion of the population that has been vaccinated and not infected.

Results

After weighting the results to reflect national demographics, the researchers found that a mere 2% of the population had neither anti-spike nor anti-nucleocapsid antibodies. These are people who have likely never had COVID nor been vaccinated.

10% had only anti-spike antibodies. These are people who were likely vaccinated, but never infected.

The researchers noted that there is “an increasing incidence of reinfection” with the omicron wave.

Blood service survey is the best we have

The blood services have been regularly testing blood samples from donors throughout the pandemic, looking at the presence of anti-nucleocapsid antibodies.

While other surveys might be more representative of the population than the blood donor ones, these have been infrequently published or published long after the survey was conducted. By contrast the blood donor surveys are relatively affordable and quick to publish. Also, as far as we are aware, it is the only survey repeatedly testing the same group of people, so that comparisons across time are possible.

Past blood surveys

The blood services’ survey from samples taken in May 2021 estimated that 47% of the adult population had previously been infected.

The next survey of blood samples was taken in November 2021 after the delta wave. This was just before the omicron wave. The researchers estimated that about 70% of people had been infected.

The latest survey indicates that about 87% of people have been infected.

The previous surveys found that levels of infection differed by province. Now these differences have “largely disappeared as prevalence appears to have saturated”.

Differences across race

There are significant differences in rates of infection when different races are compared.

The November survey showed that about 80% of black donors and 40% of white donors had been infected with COVID.

In the latest survey the proportion of white and Asian donors that only have anti-spike antibodies (indicating vaccination but no infection) was higher than black and coloured donors.

The researchers suggest that “white donors are both unusually likely to avail themselves of vaccination, and they are unusually able to avoid exposure, for instance by working predominantly from home, [and] living in smaller family units.”

Article by By James Stent. Republished from GroundUp under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Source: GroundUp

Categories : COVIDTags :

Scientists Pry Open Secrets of a Potent Antibody against COVID

On By ModernMedia
Even as the structure of SARS-CoV-2 changes with different variants of the virus (grey), the J08 antibody (blue) can still bind it, Scripps researchers showed. Credit: Scripps Research

Scientists have revealed the secrets of a potent antibody against SARS-CoV-2 that was discovered in COVID survivors. The antibody has a broadly neutralising effect, and is able to retain its efficacy against a wide range of variants – though not Omicron.

In 2021, Scripps Research and Toscana Life Sciences scientists screened the blood of 14 COVID-19 survivors to find the most potent antibodies against the SARS-CoV-2 virus. One of the most promising finds, now in stage II/III trials, was an antibody dubbed J08, which seemed to be capable of both preventing and treating COVID. 

Now, the same group has visualised exactly how J08 binds to different SARS-CoV-2 variants in different conformations, explaining what makes the monoclonal antibody so potent. The research, published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, suggests that the J08 antibody’s flexibility will likely keep it effective against future COVID variants.

“Even though we can’t predict what variants of COVID will emerge next, understanding the details of J08 reveals what works against the virus, and perhaps how we can engineer antibodies to be even more potent,” explained senior author Andrew Ward, PhD at Scripps Research.

On exposure to a virus like SARS-CoV-2, the body creates a variety of antibodies that bind to different sections of the virus to clear it from the body. There is considerable interest in why certain naturally produced antibodies such as J08 more effective than others. In the months after Ward and his collaborators first identified J08, it became clear that the antibody, unlike many others, was potent against a variety of COVID variants.

The researcher mapped the three-dimensional structure of J08 as it bound to the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2. J08 was confirmed to successfully attach to the Alpha, Beta, Gamma and Delta variants, preventing replication. However, J08 attached to the Omicron variant about 7 times more slowly, and then quickly detached. About 4000 times more J08 was needed to fully neutralise Omicron SARS-CoV-2 compared to the other variants.

“With variants other than Omicron, this antibody binds quickly and doesn’t come off for hours and hours,” says co-first author Gabriel Ozorowski, a senior staff scientist in the Ward lab at Scripps Research. “With Omicron, we were initially happy to find that it still binds, but it falls off very quickly. We identified the two structural changes that cause this.”

The team showed that, for all the variants, J08 binds to a very small section of the virus – a section that generally stays the same even as the virus mutates. Moreover, J08 could attach in two completely different orientations, like a key that manages to unlock a door whether it is right side up or upside down. 

“This small, flexible footprint is part of why J08 is able to withstand so many mutations – they don’t impact the antibody binding unless they happen to be in this one very small part of the virus,” said co-first author Jonathan Torres, lab manager of the Ward lab at Scripps Research.

The Omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2, however, had two mutations (known as E484A and Q493H) that changed the small area of the virus that directly interfaces with J08, anchoring it in place. Ward and his collaborators found that if just one of these mutations is present, J08 can still bind and neutralise the virus strongly, but mutations in both are what make it less effective against the Omicron variant.

The researchers said the new results support the continued clinical trials of the monoclonal antibody based on J08.

“I think we’re pretty confident that future variants won’t necessarily have both of these two critical mutations at the same time like Omicron,” remarked Ozorowski, “so that makes us hopeful that J08 will continue being very effective.”

Source: Scripps Research

Categories : HIVTags :

Anti-HIV Antibodies Achieve Viral Suppression

On By ModernMedia
HIV Infecting a T9 Cell. Credit: NIH

A trial has successfully used a novel treatment of anti-HIV antibodies to achieve viral suppression in several HIV patients. The results published in Nature, would enable a treatment not reliant on vigilant daily dosing and which could potentially reduce the body’s reservoir of HIV, something antiretroviral drugs cannot do. The antibody treatment could be used in combination with long-acting antiretrovirals, or alone after such medications have sufficiently brought down viral levels.

“The idea is that you would still be on HIV treatment, but instead of having to take a pill every day, with the long-acting versions of the antibodies, patients would be able to take infusions every six months,” said Professor Marina Caskey, who co-led the study.

In this trial, 18 participants received seven infusions of a pair of broadly neutralising antibodies over five months, while discontinuing their antiretroviral medications. Thirteen of these participants maintained viral suppression for at least five months, and in a few cases over a year, suggesting the antibodies are able to control viruses that are sensitive to the antibodies and prevent viral levels from rising to dangerous levels.

Besides suppressing the virus, antibody therapy may also have an effect on cells infected with HIV that cannot be eliminated by antiretroviral drugs. “Ultimately, with any treatment, we’d like to see a decline in the reservoir of infected T-cells, which fuel rebound when therapy is discontinued,” says Christian Gaebler, an assistant professor of clinical investigation in Nussenzweig’s lab and the study’s first author. After therapy, the team detected a decrease in the infected T-cells, specifically those that harbor intact viruses capable of replication. “It’s a promising finding that we hope to follow up on in future, larger studies,” Gaebler says.

The new study built on a previous, shorter trial in which participants had received three antibody infusions over six weeks. The researchers found that administering additional infusions was generally safe and well-tolerated, and the longer treatment period did not result in the emergence of new resistant variants.

Source: Rockefeller University

Categories : COVIDTags :

Prior COVID Infection Results in Robust Immunity after Vaccination

On By ModernMedia
Vaccine injection
Image source: NCI on Unsplash

New research published in the journal JCI Insight shows that immune responses to the Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA vaccine differ significantly in individuals depending on whether or not they had a prior COVID infection. Notably, those who had COVID before vaccination produced a surge of antibodies after the first dose, with little or no increase seen after the second dose. The opposite pattern was observed in infection-naïve individuals.

“Our study shows that the presence of immune memory induced by prior infection alters the way in which individuals respond to SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination,” explained first author Professor Steven G. Kelsen. “The lack of response after the second vaccine dose in previously infected individuals is especially relevant, because it could mean that some people may require only one dose or could potentially skip the booster shot.”

Prof Kelsen and colleagues carried out the study in health care workers, some having previously tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection and others never having been infected. The researchers measured levels of neutralising antibodies in blood samples taken at three different time points, including before vaccination and after each vaccine dose. They also performed qualitative assessment for local reactions and systemic symptoms, such as fever, headache, and fatigue, associated with vaccination.

While levels of neutralising antibodies hit their maximum in some people with prior COVID after the first vaccine dose, individuals with no history of infection showed massive responses after the second dose. Those high levels also plummeted quickly, while the COVID group retained longer lasting immunity, despite the lack of response to a second dose. However, prior infection was also linked to more frequent and longer-lasting adverse reactions to the vaccine.

“Previous studies had similarly reported long-lasting immunity and strong immune reactions in COVID patients,” Prof Kelsen said. “We now provide new information on how prior infection interacts with vaccination in terms of measurable immune response and how individuals react to mRNA vaccines based on infection history.”

The next steps for Prof Kelsen and collaborators are to modify their neutralising antibody assay to detect Omicron and other SARS-CoV-2 variants. “We also are interested in understanding how long protection from a booster dose of the vaccine lasts,” he said.

Source: EurekAlert!

Categories : AgeingTags :

Fewer Types of Antibodies Produced with Age

On By ModernMedia
old man walking with canes
Source: Miika Luotio on Unsplash

Using short-lived killifish to study how the immune system weakens with ageing, scientists have found that fewer types of antibodies are produced as organisms age. Published in eLife, the findings could lead to ways to rejuvenate the immune systems of older people.

The immune system has to constantly respond to new attacks from pathogens and remember them in order to be protected during the next infection. For this purpose, B cells build a library of information that can produce a variety of antibodies to recognise the pathogens.

“We wanted to know about the antibody repertoire in old age,” explained lead researcher Dario Riccardo Valenzano. “It is difficult to study a human being’s immune system over his or her entire life, because humans live a very long time. Moreover, in humans you can only study the antibodies in peripheral blood, as it is problematic to get samples from other tissues. For this reason, we used the killifish. It is very short-lived and we can get probes from different tissues.”

The shortest-lived vertebrates that can be kept in the laboratory, killifishes quickly age over their three to four month lifespan and have become the focus of ageing research in recent years due to these characteristics.

The researchers were able to accurately characterise all the antibodies that killifish produce. They found that older killifish have different types of antibodies in their blood than younger fish. They also had a lower diversity of antibodies throughout their bodies.

The discovery could lead to ways to rejuvenate the immune system. “If we have fewer different antibodies as we age, this could lead to a reduced ability to respond to infections. We now want to further investigate why the B cells lose their ability to produce diverse antibodies and whether they can possibly be rejuvenated in the killifish and thus regain this ability,” Valenzano said.

Source: Max Planck Institute for Biology of Ageing