For the past two decades, doctors have been using therapeutic hypothermia to prevent or treat brain injury in comatose survivors of cardiac arrest. The process involves cooling down the body, which slows the body’s metabolism and triggers other protective mechanisms that reduce brain damage. However, clinical trials of therapeutic hypothermia for out-of-hospital cardiac arrests have not consistently shown that the process works.
To get a clearer understanding, University of Michigan doctors and researchers led the Influence of Cooling duration on Efficacy in Cardiac Arrest Patient, or ICECAP, trial to determine if longer durations of cooling are more effective than those previously used. The largest US trial focusing on this question, ICECAP included 71 hospitals in the US between 2020-2025 and investigated adults who underwent cooling durations between six and 72 hours.
“We knew that cooling reduces brain injury, but we didn’t know how to make that work in a clinical environment,” said Robert Silbergleit, MD, Professor of Emergency Medicine.
“Most of the previous trials used limited durations of cooling, but longer durations were better in laboratory experiments. We wanted to study whether longer durations were more beneficial for adults with cardiac arrest.”
The study, published in JAMA, focused on 1158 patients, across different genders and races, whose heartbeats were restored with or without a defibrillator. It also included a range of injury severity seen in emergency departments. Patients who suffer cardiac arrests fall into two categories: those who have a sudden arrest, usually from a heart attack and those whose bodies have slowed down over time.
“The two situations created a lot of uncertainty in previous studies because those who have a sudden arrest are usually less sick and their hearts can be quickly restarted with defibrillators,” said William Meurer, MD, Professor of Emergency Medicine and Neurology.
“It was important to study both populations because sometimes doctors can give up hope for patients who had a longer period of CPR and never received a defibrillator shock.”
The study found that outcomes did not change when they underwent cooling for longer durations. Future analyses will explore whether duration of cooling was more important for some types of patients but not others. Additionally, the survival rate in the non-shockable patients was higher than in previous studies with cooling.
“Our study showed that some patients undergoing therapeutic hypothermia can wake up even after two weeks,” Meurer said. “Although it can be a difficult process to go through, it gives families and doctors hope.”
The team is conducting a similar study for paediatric cardiac arrest patients where they are looking at the benefits of cooling for up to four days.
Source: Michigan Medicine
