Day: January 16, 2026

Janet Giddy | If COVID-19, Why not TB? Mr President, it’s Time for a Family Chat

President Cyril Ramaphosa addresses the nation in 2021 on developments in the country’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic. (Photo: GCIS)

By Janet Giddy

South Africa had several “family chats” in which President Cyril Ramaphosa addressed the nation during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic. He should do the same for tuberculosis, argues Dr Janet Giddy of the advocacy group TB Proof.


Recently, I was flying home and got chatting to the stylishly dressed woman in the window seat next to me. We asked each other the sort of questions that traveller’s often do. Suzie (name changed) was going to Cape Town to facilitate an artist’s workshop. I told her that I worked for an NGO that did tuberculosis (TB) research and advocacy. Suzie nodded pensively, then said: “My dad had TB”. I was just thinking how to respond, when she added: “he died from it”.

I have conversations about TB almost every day, and have previously written about high-altitude chats with fellow travellers. I get into these conversations not because TB work is my “day job” – which it is – but because I am a TB activist, and a survivor of childhood TB.

There are many remarkable things about TB that keep me engaged, enraged and activated. For example, that 29 934 people were diagnosed with TB in 2024 in the Cape Town metro, which was more than the combined number diagnosed with TB in the whole of the United States (10 347), the United Kingdom (5 480), France (4 217), and Canada (1 258). The population of these four countries combined is over 500 million, while Cape Town has a population of just under five million people. If you do the math, the risk of getting TB clearly depends massively on where you live. If these figures do not shock you, they should.

Why are so many people in South Africa unaware and seemingly unconcerned about the extraordinarily high numbers of people infected with TB in our country? Could we take TB more seriously as a country? My answer is yes.

If COVID-19, why not TB?

As expected, South Africa worked up a huge head of steam at every level of society about COVID-19. I think back on President Cyril Ramaphosa’s regular avuncular “family chats” to the nation. In the first COVID-19 “family chat”, our president told us:

“This is a decisive measure to save lives of South Africans from infection and save the lives of hundreds of thousands of our people. While this measure will have a considerable impact on people’s livelihoods, and on the life of our society and on our economy, the human cost of delaying this action would be far, far greater.”

Why has Ramaphosa not ever spoken in this intimate “family style” way to the nation about how important or urgent it is to tackle TB? A disease which continues to cause significantly more suffering and death than COVID-19 did.

In 2018, our president spoke to the international world about TB, when he addressed the President of the General Assembly of the United Nations (UN) and Director-General of the World Health Organization at the first ever UN High-Level Meeting on Tuberculosis. With great gravitas and in oratorial style, Ramaphosa said: “This … is a historic opportunity that we must embrace if we are to effectively respond to a disease that has killed more people than smallpox, malaria, the plague, influenza, HIV and AIDS, and Ebola combined. This meeting is taking place in the year of the centenary of the birth of South Africa’s founding President, Nelson Mandela. President Mandela was a survivor of tuberculosis, which he contracted while in prison, and was firmly committed to the campaign against the disease.”

Ramaphosa went on to highlight the social determinants of TB, including poverty, unemployment, poor nutrition, overcrowding and social stigma that fuel the spread of diseases. He also noted: “In South Africa, TB is the biggest cause of mortality in the general population, especially among men.”

This was an excellent message, but since 2018, our president has not had much to say about TB in public or to South Africans. It would be powerful and impactful if he were to talk about TB as a national emergency that requires a coordinated “family response” as a nation.

In considering the seriousness of TB as compared to COVID-19, let’s look at mortality.

By November 2022, the official number of deaths recorded as being due to COVID-19 in South Africa was around 102 000, approximately 34 000 per year when averaged out. Official numbers are however widely considered to be an underestimate. The Medical Research Council estimated in the region of 300 000 excess deaths relating to COVID-19 from 2020 to 2022, with around 85 000 in 2020, 200 000 in 2021, and around 15 000 a few months into 2022. Not all of these excess deaths would have been directly due to COVID-19, but it is likely that over 80% was (say 240 000 over the three years).

By comparison, TB has in recent years been claiming between 50 000 and 70 000 lives per year, based on estimates from the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Thembisa mathematical model. Thus, while there were many more COVID-19 deaths in 2021 than there were TB deaths, TB deaths almost certainly surpassed COVID-19 deaths in 2022 and subsequent years. The more one zooms out, the more the steady torrent of TB deaths over the last five, 10, 20 years, dwarfs the spike in COVID-19 deaths around 2021.

‘We are all at risk’

Back to my recent high-altitude chat in the plane: somehow, it was a uniquely South African sort of conversation. What is the chance that, while cruising at 10 000 meters over the Atlantic on a flight between the United States and France, that you’d sit next to someone whose parent recently died of TB? An extremely small chance. So, I would contend that all South Africans do need to know about TB, which is a disease that affects families profoundly.

It’s time for South Africa to have family chats about TB. There are many reasons to have these chats, starting with the fact that we are all at risk of getting it, given that we live in a country with a high TB prevalence – it was estimated that 389 people per 100 000 in South Africa fell ill with TB in 2024. We could compare this with the 2024 figures for the United Kingdom, at 9.7 per 100 000, which is higher than the United States’ rate of 3.2 per 100 000. For those who are interested, you can look up the latest numbers for different countries on the WHO’s excellent TB data portal.

The bottom line is that the higher the TB prevalence in the country you live in, the more chance that you or a family member could get TB. This is because it is caused by a bacteria which is transmitted through the air via talking, singing and coughing, so anyone can breathe it in – as was the situation (and therefore, panic) with Covid.  The mode of transmission is the main similarity between TB and COVID-19 – there are lots of differences.

While some people are more at risk of getting TB, anyone can get TB, from any background. As a recent example: in 2024 Anna (name changed), a professional woman who lived in a green leafy suburb, was referred to me by her GP. Anna was shocked and outraged that she had been diagnosed with TB: “Janet, I feel as if I have been infected with a third world plague”. Anna wanted to believe that she had been infected with TB on a visit to India 18 months previously, but together we traced back her potential exposure and worked out she most likely was infected six months earlier, by a family member in a care home. Because Anna and her GP did not think about TB, it took more than a month of her coughing, losing weight and having no energy and taking several courses of antibiotics, before the diagnosis was finally made. By this time, she was very unwell, and her family members and many clients were at risk of getting TB.

Anna’s experience highlights how stigmatised TB still is as a disease. Stigma is a challenge to people from all backgrounds, and there are different reasons for it. Talking about TB more openly is one way to reduce stigma.

As with many other diseases, the earlier TB is diagnosed, the better the chance of full recovery, with no residual lung damage. There is effective medication to treat TB, and although treatment typically takes 6 months, it is not lifelong unlike chronic diseases like diabetes, hypertension and HIV. Young children with uncomplicated lung TB take medication for 4 months only.

Recent TB guidelines recommend that all close contacts of people diagnosed with TB (usually family or household members) should be tested for TB (even if they don’t have symptoms), and if they test negative, they can be offered TB preventive treatment (TPT), which will protect them against getting active TB disease. There is also more “user friendly” TPT now available, which consists of taking medication once a week for 3 months – a total of 12 doses only. Counselling people with TB needs to be family focused, given these new developments.

So, my challenge to readers is to have regular intentional conversations about TB with family and friends, with colleagues, in airplanes, and while waiting in queues.

Keely, a young women who read a previous Spotlight article I wrote, said she was amazed to discover that her colleague was very anxious because her mother was being treated for TB. If Keely had not decided to talk about TB at work, she would not have been able to offer her colleague support.

Try having a conversation about TB in the next week and see what comes of it.

*Giddy is a consultant at the TB advocacy group TB Proof.

Note: Spotlight aims to deepen public understanding of important health issues by publishing a variety of views on its opinion pages. The views expressed in this article are not necessarily shared by the Spotlight editors.

Republished from Spotlight under a Creative Commons licence.

Read the original article.

Review Finds Rapid Rebound from Weight Loss Medications

Photo by I Yunmai on Unsplash

Obesity is a chronic, repeating disease: those who lose weight tend to put it back on after a time. In order to understand the impact of stopping weight management medications (WMMs), researchers conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on the effect of these drugs on long-term health and body mass.

The research indicates that individuals typically experience rapid weight regain after treatment ends, with many returning to their original weight within approximately 1.7 years. Furthermore, cardiometabolic improvements, including blood pressure and glucose levels, were found to typically reverse and return to baseline shortly after the drugs are discontinued.

Notably, weight is regained significantly faster after pharmacological treatment than after finishing behavioural weight management programmes. Listen to our podcast for a summary of the paper published in The BMJ, along with the researchers’ conclusions.

Discovery Abandons R170 Million Clawback over Medicines Reimbursement Glitch

Photo by Scott Graham on Unsplash

Discovery Health has recently abandoned its efforts to reclaim roughly R170 million from 16 507 members following a widespread administrative error in processing medical claims. This happened after the successful intervention of the advocacy group MediCheck, which argued that the affected members were being unfairly penalised for a technical glitch which they had nothing to do with.

The glitch, which happened last year, resulted in over-reimbursement of certain medicine costs that occurred throughout 2025. Several specific technical and procedural issues were involved which caused the problem to grow undetected for nearly a year, as detailed by Moonstone.

The main error was that certain claims were incorrectly reimbursed at 100% of the Discovery Health Rate, regardless of the specific benefit limits that should have applied to those categories, when they should have been reimbursed at a lower rate.

Because these claims were incorrectly reimbursed at higher rates, they were inaccurately accumulated towards members’ benefit thresholds. This caused members who had Above-Threshold Benefit (ATB) as part of their plan to reach it prematurely. Upon reaching the ATB, subsequent medical claims were funded by the scheme. Normally, these claims would have been covered by the members’ medical savings accounts or out-of-pocket contributions.

Delayed detection allowed the problem to grow. The error was particularly difficult to identify because it was a “second-order impact”. The systemic failure only became apparent late in the year when members began reaching the ATB and the financial discrepancies were finally flagged.

This snowballing error eventually affected some 16 507 members on specific Executive, Comprehensive, and Priority plans. While Discovery Health initially sought to recover these funds, ranging from thousands of rand to as much as R80 000 per member, the Council for Medical Schemes stepped in to exert pressure amid widespread media coverage of the situation. Discovery gave in and committed to refunding any recovered funds and absorbing the total financial loss itself – estimated between R130 million and R170 million.

Certain DNA Sequences Grow and Become More Unstable with Age

Photo by Sangharsh Lohakare on Unsplash

An analysis of genetic data over nearly one million individuals shows that certain stretches of DNA, made up of short sequences repeated over and over, become longer and more unstable as we age. The study found that common genetic variants can speed up or slow down this process by up to fourfold, and that certain expanded sequences are linked to serious diseases including kidney failure and liver disease.

Why it matters

More than 60 inherited disorders are caused by expanded DNA repeats: repetitive genetic sequences that grow longer over time. These include devastating conditions like Huntington’s disease, myotonic dystrophy, and certain forms of ALS. Most people carry DNA repeats that gradually expand throughout their lives, but this instability and what genetic factors control it hadn’t been fully analysed within large biobanks. This study demonstrates that DNA repeat expansion is far more widespread than previously recognised and identifies dozens of genes that regulate this process, opening new avenues for developing treatments that could slow disease progression.

What the study did

Researchers from UCLA, the Broad Institute, and Harvard Medical School analysed whole-genome sequencing data from 490 416 UK Biobank participants and 414 830 All of Us Research Program participants. They developed new computational methods to detect and measure DNA repeat lengths and instability from standard sequencing data. The team examined 356 131 polymorphic repeat locations across the genome, tracking how repeat lengths changed with age in blood cells and identifying genetic variants that influenced expansion rates. They also searched for links between repeat expansions and thousands of disease outcomes to discover previously unknown disease associations.

What they found

Common DNA repeats in blood cells expand as people age. The researchers identified 29 genetic locations where inherited variants modified DNA repeat expansion rates, with effects varying up to fourfold between individuals with the highest and lowest genetic risk scores. Interestingly, the same DNA repair genes had opposite effects on different repeats: variants that stabilised some repeats destabilised others. The study also discovered that expansions in the GLS gene, which have a prevalence of around 0.03%, were associated with 14-fold higher risk of severe kidney disease and 3-fold higher risk of liver diseases, representing a newly recognised repeat expansion disorder.

What’s next

The findings establish blood-based DNA repeat measurements as potential biomarkers for testing future therapies aimed at slowing repeat expansion in diseases like Huntington’s. The research team’s computational tools can now be applied to other large biobank datasets to discover additional unstable repeats and disease associations. Understanding why the same genetic modifiers have opposite effects on different repeats will require detailed mechanistic studies of how DNA repair processes vary across cell types and genetic contexts. The discovery of GLS repeat-associated kidney and liver disease suggests additional unrecognised repeat expansion disorders may be lurking in biobank data, waiting to be found.

From the experts

“We found that most human genomes contain repeat elements that expand as we age,” said Margaux L. A. Hujoel, PhD, lead author of the study and assistant professor in the Departments of Human Genetics and Computational Medicine at the David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA. “The strong genetic control of this expansion, with some individuals’ repeats expanding four times faster than others, points to opportunities for therapeutic intervention. These naturally occurring genetic modifiers show us which molecular pathways could be targeted to slow repeat expansion in disease.”

Source:

New Cardiac Gene Therapy Trial Treats its First Patient

Source: Wikimedia CC0

A Scottish patient has become the first person in the world to receive a pioneering therapy aimed at improving outcomes for those having heart bypass surgery. The treatment involves precisely editing DNA in veins to be used during heart bypass surgery to boost the production of a protective protein.

The treatment could help extend the lifespan of blood vessels used during the surgery and significantly improve patient health, experts say.

Cause of failures in bypass surgery

Heart bypass surgery – an operation to improve blood flow to the heart – is a life-saving treatment for patients with coronary heart disease.

The process typically uses one artery and two or more veins as bypass grafts – healthy blood vessels used to bypass a narrowed or blocked artery – creating a new route for blood to flow. 

Vein grafts used in this type of surgery can fail because they are not naturally designed to withstand the high pressure of blood flow from the heart.

Protecting vein grafts

The PROTECT study, led by NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde and the University of Glasgow in collaboration with NHS Golden Jubilee and the University of Edinburgh, is trialling a new gene therapy designed to support newly grafted blood vessels. 

The treatment will introduce a gene, which produces a protein called TIMP-3, into the vein to be grafted. 

TIMP-3 is involved in tissue remodelling. Higher levels of the protein could help to prevent thickening and blockage of the blood vessel over time, scientists say.

Exciting milestone

The research team has developed a way to treat the graft directly at the time of surgery, safely and efficiently delivering the gene therapy to the affected tissue before grafting into the heart.

It is hoped the treatment will help to extend a patient’s healthy life expectancy and reduce the need for further surgeries, experts say. 

Source: The University of Edinburgh