A joint study by the University of Oulu and Oulu University Hospital in Finland suggests that a newborn’s upper lip frenulum is unlikely to be a major cause of breastfeeding difficulties.
The study, published in JAMA Network Open, followed 264 mother–infant pairs at Oulu University Hospital between 2023 and 2024. Researchers assessed the anatomy and mobility of the upper lip frenulum in healthy, full-term infants and compared the findings with mothers’ reported breastfeeding experiences.
Overall, 86% of mothers reported experiencing breastfeeding difficulties during the first days of breastfeeding. However, based on data collected in the six-month follow-up questionnaire, the researchers found no association between the anatomical characteristics of the upper lip frenulum and breastfeeding problems. The thickness of the frenulum, its attachment site, or other structural features did not increase the risk of breastfeeding difficulties.
Instead, previous breastfeeding experience appeared to be beneficial for breastfeeding. Breastfeeding problems were reported less frequently among mothers with experience of breastfeeding previous children.
According to the researchers, an upper lip frenulum that interferes with breastfeeding is a rare finding. Nevertheless, the number of lip-tie release procedures has increased in several countries in recent years, despite limited evidence supporting their benefits.
“Breastfeeding difficulties in newborns should always be assessed comprehensively,” said paediatrician and neonatologist Outi Aikio. “Based on our findings, we found no evidence to support upper lip frenulum surgery in healthy, full-term infants. Instead, I would emphasise the importance of high-quality breastfeeding support, particularly in the early weeks after birth, when breastfeeding challenges are common.”
Meningitis is rare in newborns but often life-threatening and can cause serious and lasting damage, including developmental problems. Now, researchers from ETH Zurich and the University of Basel have developed an approach that seeks to prevent transmission to newborns. The research is published in Nature Communications.
Although meningitis is thankfully rare in newborns as a whole, it is more common in premature babies, affecting one in every 500 such infants in industrialised economies and likely more in developing countries. One of the leading pathogens responsible for these meningitis cases is the K1 form of the E. coli bacterium. In the adult intestine: in one in three healthy adults, E. coli K1 is part of the intestinal flora. As a silent cohabitant, the bacterium causes no problems in this environment. It is kept in check by other bacteria and a functioning immune system.
However, if the pathogen is carried by an expectant mother, it can be transmitted to the child during birth and enter its intestine. In premature babies whose immune systems are still weak, the pathogen can enter the bloodstream and migrate to the brain, where it causes severe inflammation.
First weaken the pathogen, then fight it
Researchers led by Emma Slack, Professor of Mucosal Immunology at ETH Zurich, and Médéric Diard, Professor of Infection Biology at the Biozentrum of the University of Basel, want to stop transmission from happening in the first place. Their idea is to eliminate the pathogen in pregnant women who carry it in their intestine – but that’s easier said than done.
A year ago, the two researchers from Zurich and Basel had already jointly developed a concept for eradicating other pathogens living in the intestine (as ETH News reported). Back then, they used a combination therapy with two components: an oral vaccination that weakens the pathogenic bacterium, followed by a dose of harmless microbes that compete with the weakened pathogen for food, starve it out, and ultimately supersede it. In experiments on mice, the researchers demonstrated that this approach can eliminate certain salmonellas and E. coli strains in the intestine.
So tough that three components are needed
However, the K1 form of E. coli is a formidable opponent: unlike other E. coli bacteria, it is protected by a slippery outer layer. This prevents the antibodies generated by the oral vaccination from attacking the bacterium.
The team of researchers led by Slack and Diard therefore extended its previous two-pronged approach with a third component known as bacteriophages (or simply phages). These are viruses that specifically infect and kill bacteria.
However, the bacteria can make changes to themselves in order to evade the danger posed by these viruses. The phages attack the bacteria by docking to the protective layer, and the bacteria seek to prevent this by undergoing a sort of rapid evolution in which this layer is disposed of. Rapid in this case means that, since the bacteria are so numerous and multiply so quickly, they need fewer than 24 hours to adapt.
“This is essentially a resistance mechanism that the bacteria deploy against the phages,” says Slack. “We use this mechanism to our advantage: the antibodies formed by the oral vaccination are effective against K1 bacteria that no longer have their protective coating.”
Most young animals protected
The project involved searching for effective strains of phages. Scientists generally find phages in places that are home to lots of bacteria: nutrient-rich bodies of water, the intestinal flora or, very often, waste water and waste water treatment plants. When it comes to the phages used in this study, the researchers from the Biozentrum in Basel found what they were looking for in waste water samples from the treatment plant of the Lucerne conurbation. From such a sample, their lab work successfully isolated several phages that are particularly effective at attacking the bacterium E. coli K1.
In experiments with pregnant mice, which the researchers had previously infected with pathogenic E. coli K1, they were able to demonstrate the effectiveness of their triple-pronged treatment. The researchers first gave the mice phages that forced the bacteria to cast off their protective shell. Second, they administered an oral vaccination that produced antibodies in the intestine in order to weaken the bacteria. Third, they gave them a harmless probiotic bacterium that could compete against the weakened bacteria and occupy their ecological niche in the intestine.
In a control experiment in which the researchers did not treat the mothers, E. coli K1 was transmitted to 83% of young animals at birth. By contrast, the triple-pronged treatment significantly reduced the level of E. coli K1 in the mothers’ intestines, such that the pathogen was only transmitted to 23% of the young animals. The remaining offspring were protected.
Works even when antibiotics fail
The researchers are now keen to continue with their approach in order to develop a treatment for humans. In a world in which effective antibiotics are becoming increasingly scarce, we need new therapeutic approaches, says Slack. “Bacteria such as E. coli K1 are difficult to tackle. Our approach is potentially the only one that can be used to fight this pathogen and others without antibiotics.”
Not only can E. coli K1 cause cases of meningitis in newborns, which today must be treated with antibiotics in a race against time. It is also one of the most frequent causes of cystitis and pyelitis – infections that can also lead to serious cases of sepsis.
The ETH professor doesn’t perceive any major obstacles to developing an effective treatment for humans: “Oral vaccinations, probiotics and even phages are all already used in medicine,” she says. It will also be possible, she adds, to pack all three components into a single capsule that people can simply swallow.
Moreover, the scientists are planning projects in which they want to use the same approach to tackle bacteria other than E. coli K1, including multi-resistant pathogens, against which many antibiotics are no longer effective.
Ahead of World Malaria Day on 25 April, the World Health Organization (WHO) has announced a significant step forward in the fight against malaria with the prequalification of the first treatment developed specifically for newborns and young infants weighing between two and five kilograms. The prequalification designation indicates that the medicine meets international standards of quality, safety and efficacy, and will help to expand access to quality-assured treatment for one of the most underserved patient groups.
The newly prequalified treatment, artemether-lumefantrine, is the first antimalarial formulation designed specifically for the youngest malaria patients. Until now, infants with malaria have been treated with formulations intended for older children, which increase the risk of dosing errors, side effects and toxicity. WHO prequalification will enable public sector procurement, contributing to closing a long-standing treatment gap for some 30 million babies born each year in malaria-endemic areas of Africa.
“For centuries, malaria has stolen children from their parents, and health, wealth and hope from communities,” said Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, WHO Director-General. “But today, the story is changing. New vaccines, diagnostic tests, next-generation mosquito nets and effective medicines, including those adapted for the youngest, are helping to turn the tide. Ending malaria in our lifetime is no longer a dream – it is a real possibility, but only with sustained political and financial commitment. Now we can. Now we must.”
New prequalified tests
On 14 April 2026, WHO also prequalified three new rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) designed to address emerging diagnostic challenges for malaria. The most common malaria RDTs for P. falciparum parasite work by detecting the protein, known as HRP2. But based on reported studies and surveys in 46 countries, some strains of the malaria parasite have lost the gene that makes this protein – so they become “invisible” to HRP2-based RDTs, leading to false-negative results. In countries in the Horn of Africa, up to 80% of cases were missed, leading to delayed treatment, severe illness, and even death.
The new tests address this issue by targeting a different parasite protein (pf-LDH) that the malaria parasite cannot easily shed. They provide a reliable, quality-assured alternative where HRP2-based tests are failing. WHO now recommends that countries switch to these alternative RDTs when more than 5% of cases are missed due to pf-hrp2 deletions. This ensures accurate diagnosis, appropriate treatment, and protects hard-won malaria control gains – especially for the most vulnerable communities.
Researchers have found that sucrose can relieve newborn babies’ pain during common hospital procedures
Photo by Christian Bowen on Unsplash
A new Cochrane review has found that sucrose can help with pain relief in newborn babies during common hospital procedures, such as venepuncture. This involves drawing blood with a needle, typically for testing.
Newborns, especially preterm infants in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs), undergo numerous painful procedures. Because of their immature pain regulation, they can experience these procedures intensely. Preventing and treating procedural pain in hospitalized newborns is important, as repeated untreated pain has been associated with poorer physical growth and potential effects on brain development.
Accessible, low-cost solutions such as sucrose – a sweet sugar solution placed in a baby’s mouth shortly before needle procedures – have been used for decades. However, evidence specific to some procedures, such as venepuncture, has been limited.
Despite sucrose being recommended in multiple guidelines for procedural pain relief in infants, its use in clinical settings remains inconsistent.
Low-cost, safe intervention
The new review examined 29 clinical trials involving more than 2700 preterm and full-term babies undergoing venepuncture in hospital. It found that sucrose probably reduces pain during and immediately after the needle procedure when compared to no treatment, water or standard care. The findings also suggest that sucrose works especially well when combined with non-nutritive sucking, such as a pacifier or dummy.
“Newborn babies undergo frequent needle procedures in hospital without any pain relief or comforting measures, even though older children and adults rarely have these procedures done without pain care.
The evidence shows that a small amount of sucrose given just before the procedure is a simple, fast and effective way to reduce that pain. Our review helps clinicians use this evidence more confidently and consistently in practice.”
—Mariana Bueno, University of Toronto
None of the studies included in the review reported immediate side effects from sucrose when used in the small amounts required for pain relief. However, the studies focused on short-term effects, and more research is needed to understand any potential long-term effects of repeated use in babies who spend extended time in neonatal care.
“Parents may be surprised to learn that something as simple as a few drops of sugar solution can make a real difference to their baby’s comfort during blood tests.
This is a low-cost, safe intervention that works within minutes, and it can be especially helpful when other comforting methods like skin-to-skin contact or breastfeeding aren’t possible.”
—Ligyana Candido, University of Ottawa
Treated like other medications
Although sucrose is already widely used in neonatal units, the researchers found considerable variation in how it is given, including differences in dose and timing.
Bueno added:
“What stood out to me when doing this review was the wide variation in how sucrose was given to newborns.”
The authors suggest the findings can help inform clearer clinical protocols and more consistent practice.
They also highlight that sucrose should be used purposefully for painful procedures and documented appropriately, rather than being given routinely to settle a crying baby.
“To ensure safety and clinical consistency, sucrose must be administered under formal medication protocols that define specific timing and dosage for painful procedures.”
— Jiale Hu, Virginia Commonwealth University
The review authors say future research should focus on comparing effective comfort measures such as skin-to-skin contact, breastfeeding and sucrose with each other, rather than continuing to compare them to no treatment, and on understanding any potential long-term effects of repeated use in babies who spend extended time in neonatal care.
