Tag: epidural

Epidurals Not Linked to Increased Harm for Newborns or Children

Study provides strong evidence that epidural analgesia in labour is safe for newborns, say researchers

Photo by Duda Oliveira

Having an epidural during labour is not associated with clinically significant increased risks of harm to newborn babies, including brain injury, severe breathing problems, sepsis and death, or cerebral palsy later in childhood.

The researchers say these findings “support widening availability and equitable access to epidural analgesia as a safe component of intrapartum care.”

Epidural analgesia in labour provides effective pain relief and may help reduce complications in mothers after giving birth, but evidence of its effect on newborn and child health is limited.

To address this, researchers analysed data for 495 695 births in Scotland over a 13 year period (2007-2019) to examine whether epidural analgesia during labour was associated with serious neurological conditions occurring within 28 days of birth.

Only women who delivered a single baby vaginally or via unplanned caesarean section between 24 and 42 weeks of pregnancy were included in the analysis.

Further measures included other severe newborn illness, sepsis, low Apgar score (a routine test of a baby’s health) five minutes after birth, death within 28 days of birth, and cerebral palsy diagnosed at any point during childhood.

Factors such as mother’s age, ethnicity, weight, existing pre-eclampsia or diabetes, smoking history, birth location and gestational age at birth, were also taken into account.

Of nearly 500 000 women included in the study, around one in four had an epidural during labour. Overall, serious neurological conditions were rare, affecting fewer than 1 in 1000 babies. These conditions occurred at the expected rate and were no more common among babies whose mothers had an epidural compared with those who did not.

No association was found between epidural analgesia in labour and serious neurological conditions, other severe newborn illness, sepsis, low Apgar score at five minutes, death at 28 days, or cerebral palsy in childhood.

This is an observational study so no firm conclusions can be drawn about cause and effect, and the authors acknowledge that the study was limited to women delivering in Scotland, a predominantly white population, so the findings may not apply to more ethnically diverse populations or other healthcare settings.

However, this was a large study with long term follow-up of newborn and childhood outcomes, and results were consistent after additional analyses across various groups including women considered to have high risk pregnancies and preterm births, supporting the reliability of the findings.

As such, the authors conclude: “These results should reassure parents and clinicians that epidural analgesia use in labour is safe for babies and support informed, evidence based decision making about analgesic options in labour.”

Source: The BMJ Group

Epidural Steroid Injections for Chronic Back Pain

Photo by Cottonbro on Pexels

The American Academy of Neurology (AAN) has developed a new systematic review to summarise for neurologists and other clinicians the evidence for epidural steroid injections and whether they reduce pain and disability for people with certain kinds of chronic back pain. The systematic review is published online in Neurology®.

It updates a 2007 assessment by the AAN. With an epidural steroid injection, a steroid or corticosteroid medication is injected into the epidural space with the aim of helping reduce certain kinds of back pain.

“Chronic back pain is common and can negatively impact a person’s quality of life, making it difficult to move, sleep and participate in daily activities,” said author Carmel Armon, MD, of Loma Linda University School of Medicine in California and a Fellow of the American Academy of Neurology. “In our review, studies show epidural steroid injections may have limited efficacy. They may modestly reduce pain in some situations for up to three months and reduce disability for some people for up to six months or more.”

For the review, researchers analysed all available studies over a 16-year period. A total of 90 studies were examined. The review focused on the use of epidural steroid injections to reduce pain for people with radiculopathy and spinal stenosis. Radiculopathy is a condition caused by a pinched nerve in your spine. Spinal stenosis is a condition where spinal cord or nerves have become compressed because the space around the spinal cord has become too small. For people with radiculopathy, the review says studies show epidural steroid injections may be effective at modestly reducing pain and disability for up to three months after the procedure.

When compared to people not receiving the treatment, 24% more people receiving the treatment reported reduced pain, and 16% more reported reduced disability for up to 3 months. The treatment may also reduce disability for up to six months or more, with 11% more of those treated reporting reduced disability. Most of the reviewed studies looked at people with radiculopathy in their lower backs, so it is unclear how effective the treatment is for those with radiculopathy in their necks. For people with spinal stenosis, studies show epidural steroid injections might modestly reduce disability for up to six months or more after the procedure.

When compared to people not receiving the treatment, 26% more people receiving the treatment reported reduced disability up to three months, and 12% more for up to six months or more. The treatment was not found to reduce pain for up to three months. All studies looked at people with stenosis in their lower backs, so researchers do not know how effective the treatment is for people with stenosis in their necks.

“Our review affirms the limited effectiveness of epidural steroid injections in the short term for some forms of chronic back pain,” said author Pushpa Narayanaswami, MD, of Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston and a Fellow of the American Academy of Neurology. “We found no studies looking at whether repeated treatments are effective or examining the effect of treatment on daily living and returning to work. Future studies should address these gaps.”

Source: American Academy of Neurology