Category: COVID

Confusion Results in Vaccine Priority for ‘6.2cm’ Tall UK Man

As a result of an error at his GP surgery, a healthy man aged 32 was offered an early COVID vaccination because his height was recorded as 6.2cm – giving him a calculated Body Mass Index (BMI) of 28 000.

Liam Thorp, political editor at The Liverpool Echo’s, said he was left “really confused” after he was offered the vaccine ahead of the government’s rollout, sharing the “frankly surreal” experience in a Twitter thread.  Vaccinations are not expected to begin until later in the year for the UK’s under-50s without underlying health conditions, perhaps as soon as March.

Manchester Evening News politics and investigations editor, Jennifer Williams, replied: “Should they not have been in touch before to see how the man the size of a thumb was getting on?” And palliative care doctor Rachel Clarke said: “This, for me, is the single best tweet of the entire pandemic, Liam. And may I please commend your decency in not exploiting your remarkable BMI to jump the queue?”

Despite being “on the chunky side”, Thorp didn’t think of his himself as obese. He said he was “uneasy”, thinking that he still ought to accept the invitation for vaccination, he contacted his GP about the situation whereupon he learned of the error which resulted in his height being recorded as 6.2cm – a mixup of his height as 6ft 2in (188cm). This resulted in his bizarre BMI of 28 000.

“If I had been less stunned, I would have asked why no one was more concerned that a man of these remarkable dimensions was slithering around south Liverpool. But he was very apologetic and really nice and I think he was just relieved that I found it so funny,” recalled Thorp.

Dr Fiona Lemmens, chair of NHS Liverpool clinical commissioning group, said: “I can see the funny side of this story but also recognise there is an important issue for us to address.”

Source: The Guardian

COVID in Zambia More Widespread Than Believed

A new study from Zambia has found almost a fifth of recently-deceased people in mid-2020 tested positive for COVID. 

The study, from the Boston University School of Public Health (BUSPH) study in Zambia, upends the notion that Africa somehow ‘dodged’ the worst of the COVID pandemic. Rather, the low reported rates are merely reflective of a lack of testing ability.

“Our findings cast doubt on the assumption that COVID-19 somehow skipped Africa or has not impacted the continent as heavily,” said study co-author Dr Lawrence Mwananyanda, a BUSPH adjunct research assistant professor of global health based in Lusaka. “This study shows that with proper diagnostics and testing, we can begin to identify the scale of COVID-19 in African countries such as Zambia. I hope this study will encourage African governments to look closer at the rollout of COVID-19 testing, as well as empower Africans to take proactive steps–such as wearing masks, physically distancing, and skipping handshakes–to protect themselves from COVID-19.”

The findings have important implications for global policy makers, who will need to ensure access to vaccines worldwide, along with monitoring.

The University Teaching Hospital morgue sees roughly 80% of people who die in Lusaka pass through it. From June to September, polymerase chain reaction tests detected COVID in 70 out of 364 recently-deceased people. A peak of 31% positive results was observed in July. Unlike the typical pattern of COVID deaths elsewhere, most of the deceased people who tested positive in this study were under 60 years old, including seven children. Given how rare paediatric COVID deaths are elsewhere, this is surprising, the researchers noted.

The researchers sought information about the symptoms of the 70 who tested positive. “In nearly all cases where we had those data, we found typical symptoms for COVID-19, yet only 6 had been tested before death,” Gill said. Of 75% of deaths outside hospital, none had been tested.

Monitoring COVID is not a simple task, especially in a country with limited resources. Zambia’s Ministry of Health has been very proactive and supportive of this and other COVID studies, the researchers said.

“They’re really grateful that we can provide them this data, and they can make informed decisions moving forward with this epidemic,” said Dr Mwananyanda.

The researchers were well-positioned to track COVID in Zambia, having conducted the ongoing Zambia Pertussis/RSV Infant Mortality Estimation Study (ZPRIME) at the morgue.

“Building studies such as this from scratch can take time and resources that can be difficult in the time needed to tackle the COVID-19 pandemic. We invested a lot of time and money and human resources to building infrastructure that allowed for that extensive surveillance,” said co-author Rachel Pieciak, a research fellow at BUSPH. “So, what we’ve done was repurpose ZPRIME study capacity to focus on enrolling all deaths across all ages and testing for COVID-19.”

The researchers expressed hope that similar studies could be repurposed for the COVID fight.

Source: News-Medical.Net

Journal information: Mwananyanda, L., et al. (2021) Covid-19 deaths in Africa: prospective systematic postmortem surveillance study. BMJ. doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n334.

Volunteers to Take Part in COVID Human Challenge Trial

The first trial of its kind is set to start in the UK, with healthy volunteers being sought to be deliberately infected with COVID in a human challenge test.

The study will seek 90 healthy volunteers aged 18-30 to be infected with COVID in a safe, controlled environment. Among the study’s objectives is a desire to find out exactly how much of a viral load is needed to infect someone with COVID.

The window of opportunity in the UK for a large-scale study of this type is gradually closing because eventually it will no longer be possible to find people have not been vaccinated. However, a significant amount of information can be gleaned from even small-scale studies. This includes how second-generation vaccines compare to how well vaccines protect against new variants.

Human challenge tests have been an important part of developing understanding of and treatments for a number of diseases. The first human challenge trials for dengue fever took place in the 1900s. Although abandoned in favour of animal testing, animals were not sufficiently close to humans to advance research. Recent human challenge trials helped to develop an effective vaccine for the disease.

Clive Dix, interim chair of the Vaccines Taskforce, explained: “We have secured a number of safe and effective vaccines for the UK, but it is essential that we continue to develop new vaccines and treatments for Covid-19.

“We expect these studies to offer unique insights into how the virus works and help us understand which promising vaccines offer the best chance of preventing the infection.”

Applicants will be screened, including determining if they had COVID before, and then be intranasally infected with the virus. Volunteers will receive compensation of £4500 (about R90 000) over the course of a year, which will include follow-up tests.

Source: BBC News

COVID Antibody Drugs Work Best with Immune Cells

Research into the current antibody-based drugs for COVID treatment shows that they need to be designed to work in concert with immune cells to be effective.

Three drugs using monoclonal antibodies are approved by the FDA to treat COVID, which provide the patient’s body with ready-made antibodies faster than can be produced by their own immune systems.

The distinctive Y shape of antibodies comes from their two short arms, which latch on to foreign molecules to clear them out, and a long effector arm which interacts with immune cells, inducing them to attack infected cells and release molecules that modulate the immune response.

In antibody-dependent enhancement, the long arm of antibodies can interfere with immune cells, such as in tropical dengue fever. Immunity against one strain against dengue fever causes life-threatening illness if infected with the other strain.

To investigate the possibility of this in COVID, some companies altered the long arm of their antibodies to prevent interaction with immune cells. Other companies took the opposite approach and strengthened antibody effector functions to boost the potency of their drugs.

“Some of the companies removed the effector functions from their antibodies, and other companies are trying to optimise the effector functions,” said senior author Michael S Diamond, MD, PhD, the Herbert S Gasser Professor of Medicine. “Neither of these strategies is backed by data in the context of SARS-CoV-2 infections. Based on our findings, if you have a potently neutralising antibody without effector functions and you give it before infection, as a preventive, it will probably work. But if you give it after infection, it won’t work well; you need to optimise effector functions to get maximal benefit.”

“‘Effector functions’ refers to a complex set of interactions between antibodies and other elements of the immune system,” said Prof Diamond, who also is a professor of molecular microbiology and of pathology and immunology. “You can introduce different point mutations to augment certain kinds of effector functions, and some might be harmful to the immune response while others might be beneficial. There’s a lot of nuance. We are still learning how to harness effector functions so you get what you want but not what you don’t want.”

To find how antibody effectors work with COVID, the researchers took an antibody which was known to be effective against the virus and disabled the effector so it could not interact with immune cells.

They administered the original antibodies, the disabled antibodies and placebo antibodies each to a different group of mice, which were infected a day later with SARS-CoV-2. Both normal and disabled effector antibodies were able to protect against the disease. There were no signs of antibody enhancement of the disease, fortunately.

To find out whether the effector function was needed for treatment after infection, they infected mice with SARS-CoV-2 and administered one of the three sets of antibodies to mice  one, two or three days later. Only the original antibodies protected the mice from the disease. The tests were run in hamsters with the same results.

The researchers discovered in the study that losing effector functions changed the types of immune cells recruited to fight the COVID infection and the way they behaved.

Source: Medical Xpress

Journal information: Emma S. Winkler et al, Human neutralizing antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 require intact Fc effector functions for optimal therapeutic protection, Cell (2021). DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.02.026

Over Half of SA Has Had COVID, Says Discovery CEO

From the number of excess deaths in South Africa, it appears that over half of South Africa has been infected with COVID at least once.

The CEO and founder of the Discovery Group, Adrian Gore, has said in an interview on 702’s The Money Show that he believes over half of the South African population has had COVID. He believes that there is “absolutely no ambiguity” that the “sky high” excess death rates recorded in SA are attributable to COVID. He said that the excess deaths point to over 50% of the SA population having been infected with COVID so far.

The latest data released by the South African Medical Research Council (SAMRC) puts the number of excess deaths in SA over the course of the pandemic at 137 731 – nearly triple the official death toll from COVID. Nearly 5000 Discovery members and 12 staff members have died. 
Last week, SA National Blood Service released a study showing that 32% of people in the Northern Cape up to 63% of people in the Eastern Cape had contracted COVID. Gore said that this high infection rate would hopefully reduce the impact of the third wave predicted to arrive in the colder winter months.

“We are hoping that a third wave may take longer and might be less because we think the infection rate has been high.” He said, adding that if the first and second phases of vaccination targetting healthcare workers and vulnerable individuals was completed by mid-year, a third wave might be completely avoided.

He said that young, healthy people who can afford a vaccine should not be able to get one before those who were older and more vulnerable. “Not following this process would mean low-risk people get vaccinated before the clinically vulnerable, resulting in unnecessary illness and death. This cannot and should not happen,” he said in a Linkedin post.

He also refuted the rumour that Discovery was not paying contributions towards non-members’ vaccinations. In fact, he said on The Money Show, that medical aid schemes have extra cash to pay for this since members had been going for fewer treatments during the pandemic. This amounts to some R24 billion in surplus, as revealed by regulatory filings, which would be right in the middle of cost estimates for SA’s entire vaccination programme as opposed to the 30% amount that medical aid companies were being expected to contribute.

Source: Business Insider

Real-world Results for Pfizer Vaccine Match Trials

Encouraging results have been reported from Israel, where the real-world efficacy of the Pfizer vaccine closely matches that seen in clinical trials.

Israel has engaged in the world’s most aggressive COVID immunisation schedule, with some 30% of its population vaccinated by late January with at least one dose.

Israeli health fund Clalit matched 600 000 vaccinated individuals to an equal number of unvaccinated individuals. Those who were vaccinated experienced a similar rate of positive COVID tests as was observed in clinical trial data, equating to a 94% effectiveness. Crucially, almost no severe cases of COVID were observed in vaccinated individuals. This pattern was also seen in the over-70s age group, which is generally underrepresented in trials.

Public health doctor Prof Hagai Levine said that high vaccination coverage of the most susceptible groups was key. However, he said that he could not give an answer as to what number needed to be vaccinated before containment measures could be eased. 

“We still don’t know what the impact is on transmission,” he said. But he added that “the vaccine is useful for personal protection”.

The greatest drop in cases was seen in the over 60s age group, and in areas which had been vaccinated, indicating that this was not the result of lockdown. However, many people still remain unvaccinated, resulting in tens of thousands of cases. Prof Segal noted that the fall in cases was not as rapid as had been hoped, due to the B.1.1.7 or UK strain becoming dominant in Israel.

“We still have to exit our lockdown very cautiously,” he warned, or else hospitalisations would spike again.

The fact that the same rate was observed in clinical trials is important news for other countries, which are watching to see the effects of Israel’s vaccination programme.

Source: BBC News

The Second Vaccine Dose Can Hit Hard

The scuttlebut among healthcare workers is that the second dose of a COVID vaccine hits much harder than the first – unless you’ve had COVID, in which case the first is equally as bad.

TJ Maltese, DO, a neurologist in private practice on Long Island in New York state, was fine with the first dose of the Moderna vaccine but was flattened by the second one.

Dr Maltese got his second jab on a Friday at 4:30 pm. Within two hours his arm was sore. Overnight, he developed flu-like symptoms, and on Saturday experienced chills and body aches, with a lingering fever. He could have pushed through if he’d had to work, he said, but he rode out his symptoms on his couch with the help of the occasional painkiller.

By 9 pm on Saturday evening, Dr Maltese started to feel better, getting a good night’s sleep and on Sunday was fine again.

“I know plenty of people with minimal symptoms after the second dose, so it’s not definite you’ll feel side effects,” he wrote in a Facebook post. “But be prepared for the possibility.”

Immunology and the phase III clinical trial data from the vaccine backs up the view that the second dose is worse, and some hospitals have even altered their scheduling to allow time for recuperation after the second dose. Adverse reactions to the BCG vaccine in Brazilian school children, for example, have been reported to be common with the second dose, though still rare.  

Immunologists and infectious disease experts interviewed by MedPage Today and who shared their second-dose experiences said it’s not unexpected that second-dose reactions are more intense than the first. Typical reactions to the COVID vaccines include fever, headache and fatigue as the immune system responds to a vaccine’s antigens.

“The first time the immune system comes into contact with something, it’s getting primed,” said Purvi Parikh, MD, an immunologist at NYU Langone Health in New York City. “That goes for everything, from vaccines to allergies. It’s rare on the first time to have a strong reaction. After that, the immune system recognizes it, so you have a much stronger reaction.”

“We saw it in the trials, so it’s really not surprising,” Parikh added. “Now we’re seeing it in real time as the vaccines are being rolled out.”

More adverse effects were reported after the second dose in both Pfizer’s and Moderna’s phase III trial data. For Moderna, the rates were 54.9% versus 42.2% for placebo after the first dose and 79.4% versus 36.5% for placebo after the second dose.

Stanley Weiss, MD, an infectious disease specialist and epidemiologist at Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, told MedPage Today that because his institution served as a Moderna trial site, the primary investigator was able to give an early update on what to expect following vaccination.

“They said there was a very high rate of fatigue after the second dose, so we encouraged administrators … to figure that many healthcare workers getting the vaccine might not be well enough to work the day after the second dose,” Dr Weiss said.

Drs Weiss and Parikh both experienced a stronger response to the second COVID dose. 

Zubin Damania, MD, aka ZDoggMD, said he was knocked out by the second dose of Moderna vaccine, joking on his show that, “I couldn’t sleep, I had a fever, rigors, body aches, a headache — full-on man-flu.”

Paul Offit, MD, said that he also experienced fever and fatigue after taking the second dose of the Pfizer vaccine.

“That reaction is less common in people over 65, and I’m over 65, so I’m thinking I’m not going to suffer that, but I did,” Dr Offit said.

Older people are not expected to have as intense a reaction due to their weaker immune systems. According to Dr Parikh, “The idea is that their immune system is not as robust as a young person’s.”
The same immunological underpinnings of why reactions to the second dose are worse also apply to those who’ve had COVID.
Victoria Arthur, MD, of Lexington Pediatrics in Massachusetts, had suspected she had contracted COVID in March 2020 but could not prove it. When she received the Moderna vaccine, she felt much worse than her colleagues.

“How I felt was how everyone else was describing their second vaccine,” Dr Arthur told MedPage Today. Within three hours of her jab, she was suffering from a headache, neck pain, and cognitive fog. She awoke at 3am with nausea and stomach cramps, and spent the whole of the next day in bed. 

“I’m always grateful when I have a reaction, that means the body is doing its thing,” she said. “I’m very fortunate to have been given the vaccine, so any side effect is worth it.”

In spite of the side effects, these health care professionals all expressed gratitude at having been vaccinated.

Dr Weiss said that people shouldn’t be discouraged by the side effects from the second dose and not get vaccinated: “The benefits greatly overwhelm the risk of side effects. It’s not a reason to delay.”

Source: MedPage Today

Research Shows ‘UK Variant’ is up to 70% Deadlier

A review of research on the COVID variant B.1.1.7, also known as ‘the UK variant’, has shown it to be 30% to 70% more deadly than the original wild-type COVID strain.

Concerns over the deadliness of B.1.1.7 were raised in January, when the UK government’s New and Emerging Respiratory Virus Threats Advisory Group (NERVTAG) presented initial findings suggesting that B.1.1.7 cases were deadlier than non-variant cases. After this, they released an updated report which is available online. The report makes the cases that the earlier linked community testing and mortality data were all based on the same datasets, and so had the same biases. However, the group explained that the new analysis was more valid.

“More recent analyses have added a wider range of data sets and been able to control for additional confounders, increasing confidence in the association of the [variant of concern] with increased disease severity,” the group wrote.  

London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine found a relative hazard of mortality within 28 days was 1.58 for variant-infected individuals, while Imperial College London used a case-control weighting method to find a case fatality ratio of 1.36 for variant cases. Public Health England  found a “death risk ratio” of 1.65 in matched cohort analysis for variant cases versus non-variant cases.

A number of other studies investigated the variant’s impact on hospitalisation. Public Health Scotland used S-gene target failure as a proxy for variant case detection. They found that S-gene target failure cases had a higher risk for hospitalisation than the S-gene positive cases.
Some studies did not support the higher fatality risk, such as the UK’s Office for National Statistics (ONS), which said that “the number of deaths are too low for reliable inference.”

A number of limitations were reported in the study, including potential bias in case ascertainment, representativeness, unmeasured confounders and secular trends. They also tried to control for nursing home status in hospital reports, but not all of these could be excluded.

“There are potential limitations in all datasets used but together these analyses indicate that it is likely that … B.1.1.7 is associated with an increased risk of [hospitalisation] and death compared to infection with non-[B.1.1.7] viruses,” the group concluded.

In mid-January, modelling by the CDC indicated that the UK variant would become the dominant strain in the United States by March. At the end of January, President Joe Biden had pledged to increase vaccinations to 1.5 million per day, a target which would still not be able to contain the spread of the variant.

Source: MedPage Today

Report link

WHO Team in China Denied Key COVID Information

The World Health Organization team sent to China to investigate the origins of the COVID virus have been frustrated in their efforts to secure key data.

Team member Dominic Dwyer, infectious disease expert, said that they had only been given a summary instead of the raw patient data that they had requested.

Raw, anonymised patient data is part of standard outbreak investigation, Dwyer said, and this was particularly important because half of the initial 174 patients had no contact with the wet market.

“That’s why we’ve persisted to ask for that,” said Dwyer. “Why that doesn’t happen, I couldn’t comment. Whether it’s political or time or it’s difficult.”

Although Wuhan is the site of the initial outbreak, China has sought to cast doubt on its origin there, pointing to a source outside the country that may have come in with frozen food.

US national security adviser Jake Sullivan said that he had “deep concerns” over the initial findings of the investigation, saying that “It is imperative that this report be independent, with expert findings free from intervention or alteration by the Chinese government.”

Peter Ben Embarek, the WHO delegation leader, said that the virus likely had an animal origin and may have taken a “very long and convoluted path involving also movements across borders”. The possibility that it may have travelled in frozen food is worth investigating, he added.

After their two week quarantine, the WHO team members were only allowed to go on visits organised by their Chinese hosts. Thea Kolsen Fischer, an immunologist and another WHO team member, said to the New York Times that she saw the investigation as “highly geopolitical”.

“Everybody knows how much pressure there is on China to be open to an investigation and also how much blame there might be associated with this,” she said.

Team member Peter Daszak, and president of the EcoHealth Alliance, said that it “was not my experience”.

“As lead of animal/environment working group I found trust and openness with my China counterparts. We did get access to critical new data throughout,” he tweeted.

“New data included environmental and animal carcass testing, names of suppliers to Huanan market, analyses of excess mortality in Hubei, range of Covid-like symptoms for months prior, sequence data linked to early cases and site visits with unvetted live question and answer.”

Source: The Guardian

SA to Expedite 80 000 Doses of J&J Vaccine

South Africa will accelerate the rollout of the Johnson & Johnson vaccine, it has been reported.

SA has secured orders for 9 million doses of the vaccine, of which the first 80 000 are expected to arrive in the country next week. Since immunity with the Johnson & Johnson vaccine is achieved with a single dose, this will be enough for 9 million people in South Africa, barring some inevitable wastage. Results from clinical trials in South Africa show that the vaccine has an effectiveness of 57%, 28 days after vaccination.

Professor Linda-Gail Bekker at the Desmond Tutu HIV Centre, University of Cape Town, who was involved in a South African trial last year, explained that there is a delay between the results of a clinical trial and the licence being granted for commercial use. She has urged the need for rapid vaccine rollout, and had also tested positive for COVID herself along with her family during the festive season. As a stopgap measure, an interim vaccination plan with 80 000 doses will be put into action at 32 locations around the country.

Explaining the programme, Prof Bekker said: “Can we together bring this expedited plan forward so that we can make sure we, as quickly as possible, rollout phase one recipients – mainly healthcare workers – into a kind of emergency programme.”

Prof Bekker describes the expedited rollout as being different to a clinical trial.

She continued, “This is not clinical research in the clinical trial concept; it really is programme evaluation, and many eyes are on it at the moment to make sure that we have covered all aspects – ethical, safety and scientific. We will not move without those approvals.”

Source: Eyewitness News