Tag: knee osteoarthritis

Improving Prediction of Worsening Knee Osteoarthritis with an AI-assisted Model

New model that combines MRI, biochemical, and clinical information shows potential to enhance care

Illustration highlighting the integration of MRI radiomics and biochemical biomarkers for knee osteoarthritis progression prediction. Created with Biorender.

Image credit: Wang T, et al., 2025, PLOS Medicine, CC-BY 4.0

An artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted model that combines a patient’s MRI, biochemical, and clinical information shows preliminary promise in improving predictions of whether their knee osteoarthritis may soon worsen. Ting Wang of Chongqing Medical University, China, and colleagues present this model August 21st in the open-access journal PLOS Medicine.

In knee osteoarthritis, cartilage in the knee joint gradually wears away, causing pain and stiffness. It affects an estimated 303.1 million people worldwide and can lead to the need for total knee replacement. Being able to better predict how a person’s knee osteoarthritis may worsen in the near future could help inform more timely treatment. Prior research suggests that computational models combining multiple types of data – including a patient’s MRI results, clinical assessments, and blood and urine biochemical tests – could enhance such predictions.

The integration of all three types of information in a single predictive model has not been widely reported. To address that gap, Wang and colleagues utilized data from the Foundation of the National Institutes of Health Osteoarthritis Biomarkers Consortium on 594 people with knee osteoarthritis, including their biochemical test results, clinical data, and a total of 1,753 knee MRIs captured over a 2-year timespan.

With the help of AI tools, the researchers used half of the data to develop a predictive model combining all three data types. Then, they used the other half of the data to test the model, which they named the Load-Bearing Tissue Radiomic plus Biochemical biomarker and Clinical variable Model (LBTRBC-M).

In the tests, the LBTRBC-M showed good accuracy in using a patient’s MRI, biochemical and clinical data to predict whether, within the next two years, they would experience worsening pain alone, worsening pain alongside joint space narrowing in the knee (an indicator of structural worsening), joint space narrowing alone, or no worsening at all.

The researchers also had seven resident physicians use the model to assist their own predictions of worsening knee osteoarthritis, finding that it improved their accuracy from 46.9 to 65.4 percent.

These findings suggest that a model like LBTRBC-M could help enhance knee osteoarthritis care. However, further model refinement and validation in additional groups of patients is needed.

The authors add, “Our study shows that combining deep learning with longitudinal MRI radiomics and biochemical biomarkers significantly improves the prediction of knee osteoarthritis progression—potentially enabling earlier, more personalized intervention.”

The authors state, “This work is the result of years of collaboration across multiple disciplines, and we were especially excited to see how non-invasive imaging biomarkers could be leveraged to support individualized patient care.”

Co-author Prof. Changhai Ding notes, “This study marks a step forward in using artificial intelligence to extract meaningful clinical signals from complex datasets in musculoskeletal health.”

Provided by PLOS

Minimally Invasive Procedure Relieves Painful Symptoms of Knee Osteoarthritis

Photo by Towfiqu barbhuiya

A procedure that can be performed under mild sedation in less than two hours by an interventional radiologist relieves chronic knee pain caused by osteoarthritis, an NYU Langone Health study shows.

As they gradually break down, knee joints in people with osteoarthritis are known to become inflamed, which triggers the growth of small blood vessels (angiogenesis) and increased blood flow to joints. The study procedure, called genicular artery embolisation, kept this abnormal blood flow from ferrying in immune cells that cause the inflammation and related pain. 

For the new study, the researchers delivered chemical beads (biocompatible hydrogels) through an image-guided plastic tube to block blood flow in any of a half dozen arteries feeding the synovium lining in the knee. More than 60% of the 25 men and women who had the procedure at its facilities in Manhattan experienced significant improvements one year later.

Results of the study appear online in the Journal of Vascular Interventional Radiology.

“Our study shows that genicular artery embolisation is a safe and effective, minimally invasive treatment for those with moderate to severe symptomatic knee pain tied to osteoarthritis,” said study co-investigator and interventional radiologist Ryan M. Hickey, MD. “This work also provides evidence that genicular artery embolisation is offering more than just pain relief and could be modifying the disease process itself.”

“This procedure is particularly suited to those patients who are either not yet ready for knee replacement surgery or for whom surgery is not an option because of age or other risk factors, such as obesity, uncontrolled diabetes or heart disease, or smoking,” added Dr Hickey.

He says there is urgent need for alternative, less-invasive treatments for osteoarthritis. An estimated 24 million cases of osteoarthritis in a knee are diagnosed each year in the United States, a number he expects only to grow with the aging population.

Among the study’s other key results: significant, one-year postsurgical declines (on average 12%) in blood levels of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), a protein that is needed to stimulate the formation of new blood vessels. Past research has also linked VEGF to other structural changes in the knee from osteoarthritis. Another protein biomarker, interleukin 1 receptor agonist (IL-1Ra), showed a similar decrease (15%). IL-1Ra is known for its role in countering inflammation. Tests of a half dozen other immune molecules involved in inflammation were inconclusive.

“Our research suggests that declines in vascular endothelial growth factor could serve as a valuable biomarker or chemical trace for determining success with genicular artery embolisation, offering a much-needed objective benchmark by which to measure its effectiveness,” said study principal investigator and lead author Bedros Taslakian, MD, MA.

“Our study findings also indicate that genicular artery embolisation may, if further larger clinical trials prove successful, slow down the progression of osteoarthritis by observing significant decreases in signalling proteins, specifically vascular endothelial growth factor and interleukin 1 receptor agonist, one year after the procedure,” said Dr Taslakian.

The improvements seen in the 25 patients in the current study were captured by standard patient survey scores for knee pain, stiffness, and the ability to bend, stand up, or walk up and down stairs freely. While subjective surveys are useful in monitoring disease progression, Dr Hickey says, independent blood tests like the NGF measure are more accurate and convenient for patients for tracking small declines or improvements over time.

The NYU Langone team has plans to further investigate precisely how embolisation alleviates inflammation and leads to pain relief.

Dr Hickey also says that more research is needed to establish how long the procedure’s benefits last and which osteoarthritis patients are most likely to benefit.

All study volunteers were diagnosed with moderate to severe osteoarthritis in the knee that had been unresponsive to first-line therapy. This includes knee injections of corticosteroids to reduce inflammation; fluid aspiration (arthrocentesis) to remove excess fluid from the joint; and injections of platelet-rich plasma to repair damaged tissue, as well as physiotherapy. Study participant ages ranged from 50 years old to 78 years old, with all having their embolisation procedures performed between January 2021 and January 2023.

As part of the procedure, interventional radiologists accessed each patient’s arteries through a small incision in the thigh, using video X-ray to guide the catheter to the precise knee artery selected earlier for embolisation. Study participants were then monitored during routine checkups for at least one year and across two dozen measures of pain, knee stiffness, and their ability to move about. Patients needed to achieve a four-point difference on a scale of 20 points to establish a clinically significant reduction in pain. Side effects from the procedure, the researchers say, were minimal and limited to dark skin blemishes on the knee and mild pain near the incision site.

Source: NYU Langone Health

Small Changes in Walking Technique May Help Treat Knee Osteoarthritis

Photo by Kampus Production on Pexels

Gait analysis and pain measures show that subtly adjusting the angle of the foot during walking may reduce knee pain caused by osteoarthritis, an approach which may also slow progression of the incurable condition.

Led by a team of researchers at NYU Langone Health, the University of Utah, and Stanford University, a new study explored whether changing the way patients position their feet when walking could lessen extra loading, helping to treat the disease.

For the investigation, the scientists tested this intervention in 68 men and women with mild to moderate knee osteoarthritis and then used advanced MRI scans to track how well it worked.

The results suggest that those trained to angle their feet slightly inward or outward from their natural alignment experienced slower cartilage degeneration in the inner part of their knee compared with those who were encouraged to walk more frequently without changing their foot position. The study is reported online in The Lancet Rheumatology.

“Although our results will have to be confirmed in future studies, they raise the possibility that the new, noninvasive treatment could help delay surgery,” said study co-lead author Valentina Mazzoli, PhD.

Dr. Mazzoli, an assistant professor in the Department of Radiology at NYU Grossman School of Medicine, notes that the earlier patients receive a knee replacement, the more likely they are to require additional procedures in the future.

The findings also revealed that those who adjusted their foot angle reduced their pain score by 2.5 points on a 10-point scale, an effect equivalent to that of over-the-counter pain medications. By contrast, those who did not change their gait reduced their pain scores by little more than a point.

“Altogether, our findings suggest that helping patients find their best foot angle to reduce stress on their knees may offer an easy and fairly inexpensive way to address early-stage osteoarthritis,” added Dr. Mazzoli.

About one in seven Americans have some form of osteoarthritis, commonly in the inner side of the knee, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. A leading cause of disability, the disease is often managed with pharmaceutical pain relievers, physical therapy, and in the most severe cases, knee-replacement surgery. Experts believe that excess loading can over time contribute to the condition.

Past research has offered little evidence that changes in gait can effectively reduce knee pain caused by osteoarthritis, says Dr. Mazzoli. Some previous trials trained all participants to adopt the same foot angle and found no relief, while others did not compare the intervention to a control group or only followed the participants for a month.

The new study is the first to show that tailoring each patient’s foot angle to their unique walking pattern can alleviate the disease’s symptoms in the long term and may slow cartilage breakdown, the authors say.

Dr Mazzoli adds that this technique may have a significant advantage over pharmaceutical painkillers. These drugs, she says, do not address the underlying disease and can cause liver and kidney damage, stomach ulcers, and other unwanted side effects when taken for long periods.

For the study, the research team recorded the participants walking on a treadmill at a specialized gait-assessment laboratory. A computer program simulated their walking patterns and calculated the maximum loading that occurred in the inner side of their knees. Next, the team generated computer models of four new foot positions—angled inward or outward by either 5 or 10 degrees—and estimated which option reduced loading the most.

The patients were then randomly divided into two groups. Half were trained in six sessions to walk with their ideal angle, while the other half were instructed to continue walking naturally. Pain scores and MRI scans were taken at the beginning of the study period and one year after the intervention.

Study findings showed those who adjusted their gait reduced the maximum loading in the knees by 4 percent, while those who kept their normal walking pattern increased their loading by more than 3 percent.

“These results highlight the importance of personalizing treatment instead of taking a one-size-fits-all approach to osteoarthritis,” said Dr. Mazzoli. “While this strategy may sound challenging, recent advances in detecting the motion of different body parts using artificial intelligence may make it easier and faster than ever before.”

While the authors relied on a specialized laboratory for the new study, AI software that estimates joint loading using smartphone videos is now available and can allow clinicians to perform a gait analysis in the clinic.

The researchers next plan to test whether these tools can indeed identify the most effective walking method for osteoarthritis patients, says Dr. Mazzoli. They also plan to expand their study to people with obesity.

Source: NYU Langone Health

Simple Therapies Beat High-tech Ones for Knee Arthritis

Knee braces, water therapy, and exercise are the most beneficial non-drug therapies, per meta-analysis of more than 100 clinical trials involving nearly 10 000 people

Photo by Towfiqu barbhuiya

Knee braces, water therapy and exercise are the most promising non-drug therapies for treating knee osteoarthritis, according to a new meta-analysis publishing June 18, 2025 in the open-access journal PLOS One by Yuan Luo of the First People’s Hospital of Neijiang, China.

Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is a common and often debilitating condition that affects millions of older adults, causing pain and stiffening of the knee joint. Treatment often includes anti-inflammatory drugs, which are linked to gastrointestinal and cardiovascular adverse events.

In the new study, researchers examined the current evidence on non-drug therapies for treating KOA. They looked at data from 139 clinical trials involving nearly 10 000 people to compare 12 different non-drug treatments. These included laser therapy, electrical stimulation, braces, insoles, kinesiology tape, water-based therapy, exercise, and ultrasound. By combining results from all these studies into a powerful network meta-analysis, the team could rank the therapies based on how well they worked.

Knee braces came out on top across most categories, including reducing pain, improving function, and relieving stiffness. Hydrotherapy—exercises or treatments performed in warm water—was particularly effective at easing pain and general exercise was also consistently effective, improving both pain and physical function. High-intensity laser therapy and shock wave therapy showed some benefits, while ultrasound consistently scored the lowest in effectiveness.

The authors caution that differences in study design, small sample sizes, and variability in treatment duration between the 139 included studies may limit the precision of the rankings. However, they conclude that physical therapy has promising effects on KOA, offering potential treatments without the risks of anti-inflammatory drugs. Future studies should examine the clinical efficacy of combined therapies, as well as their cost-effectiveness.

The authors add: “Knee braces, hydrotherapy, and exercise are the most effective non-drug therapies for knee osteoarthritis. They reduce pain and improve mobility without the gastrointestinal or cardiovascular risks linked to common pain medications. Patients and clinicians should prioritize these evidence-based options.”

“Our analysis of nearly 10 000 patients reveals that simple, accessible therapies like knee bracing and water-based exercise outperform high-tech options like ultrasound. This could reshape clinical guidelines to focus on safer, lower-cost interventions.”

Provided by PLOS

How Might ACL Surgery Increase the Risk of Knee Osteoarthritis?

Anterior cruciate ligament injury. Credit Wikimedia/BruceBlaus CC4.0

Some individuals who have had anterior-cruciate-ligament reconstruction (ACLR), the kind of surgery often performed on athletes’ knees, may develop early-onset knee osteoarthritis. A new study in the Journal of Orthopaedic Research indicates that altered knee joint movement after ACLR could be a contributing factor. 

The study used a unique dynamic X-ray imaging system to accurately measure knee joint movement during walking in people who had undergone ACLR surgery and those with healthy knees. Compared with healthy controls, ACLR patients had a higher vertical position of the patella and a higher location of articular contact between the patella and the femur. A higher riding patella in the ACLR patients was caused by a longer-than-normal patellar tendon, the structure connecting the patella to the tibia. A surprising finding was that a higher riding patella was observed in both the ACLR knee and the uninjured contralateral knee of the ACLR patients. 

Investigators suspect that a higher riding patella may contribute to the development of knee osteoarthritis by shifting the load bearing areas between the patella and the femur to regions of cartilage unaccustomed to load and leaving previously loaded regions unloaded. 

“We don’t know whether a longer-than-normal patellar tendon that resulted in a higher riding patella existed prior to the ACL injury or resulted from the ACL injury or ACLR surgery. Further research is needed to determine the cause of a longer-than-normal patellar tendon in individuals who have undergone ACLR surgery,” said corresponding author Marcus G. Pandy, PhD, MEngSc, of the University of Melbourne, in Australia. 

Source: Wiley

In Knee Osteoarthritis, Inactivity may be more Complex than Believed

Photo by Towfiqu barbhuiya

Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a common cause of pain and joint stiffness. And while physical activity is known to ease symptoms, only one in 10 people regularly exercise. Understanding what contributes to patients’ inactivity is the focus of a world first study from the University of South Australia. Here, researchers have found that people with knee OA unconsciously believe that activity may be dangerous to their condition, despite medical advice telling them otherwise.

The study, published in PAIN, found that of those surveyed, 69% of people with knee pain had stronger implicit (unconscious) beliefs that exercise was dangerous than the average person without pain. It’s an interesting finding that not only highlights the conflicted nature of pain and exercise, but also that what people say and what people think, deep down, may be entirely different things.

Lead researcher, and UniSA PhD candidate based at SAHMRIBrian Pulling, says the research provides valuable insights for clinicians treating people with knee OA.

“Research shows that physical activity is good for people with knee OA, but most people with this condition do not move enough to support joint or general health,” Pulling says.

“To understand why people with OA might not be active, research studies typically use questionnaires to assess fear of moving. But unfortunately, questionnaires are limited – what we feel deep down (and how our system naturally reacts to something that is threatening) may be different to what we report. And we still know that many people are avoiding exercise, so we wanted to know why.”

To assess this, the researchers developed a tool that can detect and evaluate people’s implicit beliefs about exercise; that is, whether they unconsciously think activity is dangerous for their condition.

“We found that that even among those who said they were not fearful about exercise, they held unconscious beliefs that movement was dangerous,” Pulling says.

“Our research shows that people have complicated beliefs about exercise, and that they sometimes say one thing if asked directly yet hold a completely different implicit belief.

“People are not aware that what they say doesn’t match what they choose on the new task; they are not misrepresenting their beliefs.

“This research suggests that to fully understand how someone feels about an activity, we must go beyond just asking directly, because their implicit beliefs can sometimes be a better predictor of actual behaviour than what people report. That’s where our tool is useful.”

The online implicit association test presents a series of words and images to which a participant must quickly associate with being either safe or dangerous. The tool intentionally promotes instant responses to avoid deliberation and other influencing factors (such as responding how they think they should respond).

Associate Professor Tasha Stanton says that the new tool has the potential to identify a group of people who may have challenges increasing their activity levels and undertaking exercise.

“What people say and what people do are often two different things, Assoc Prof Stanton says.

“Having access to more accurate and insightful information will help health professionals better support their patients to engage with activity and exercise. It may also open opportunities for pain science education, exposure-based therapy, or cognitive functional therapy…things that would not usually be considered for someone who said that they were not scared to exercise.”

Researchers are now looking to see if implicit beliefs are directly associated with behaviour and are asking for people to complete the Implicit Association Test (takes seven minutes). At the end of the test participants are given their results in comparison to the rest of the population.

To take the test, please click here: https://unisasurveys.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_0OZKUqzBNtiKGF0

Source: University of South Australia

Is Stem Cell Therapy for Knee Osteoarthritis Worthwhile?

Photo by Towfiqu barbhuiya: https://www.pexels.com/photo/person-feeling-pain-in-the-knee-11349880/

Cell therapy has been explored as a new regenerative treatment for osteoarthritis, but the efficacy of stem cell transplantation from different sources for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis (KOA) remains controversial. A recent analysis of all relevant published studies indicates that stem cell transplantation from different sources is effective for treating knee osteoarthritis, the most prevalent chronic joint disease.

The review and meta-analysis, which is published in the Journal of Orthopaedic Research, included 16 studies involving 875 patients with knee osteoarthritis (441 in the stem cell transplantation group and 434 in the control group). Stem cell treatment was associated with significant reductions in patient-reported pain from the third month onwards. The most significant pain relief at different postoperative months came from fat-derived and umbilical cord–derived stem cells. A patient’s own fat-derived stem cells resulted in better pain alleviation compared with those from other donors. Also, a patient’s own fat-derived stem cells led to the most effective recovery of knee joint function.

“Stem cell transplantation proved safe and effective for knee osteoarthritis treatment,” the authors wrote. “Different sources stem cells have a good effect on alleviating knee joint pain, restoring knee joint function, and minimising patient trauma.”

Source: Wiley

Are Stem Cell Therapies Really Superior for Knee Osteoarthritis?

Photo by Towfiqu barbhuiya: https://www.pexels.com/photo/person-feeling-pain-in-the-knee-11349880/

In a study published in Nature Medicine, investigators explored the mesenchymal stem cells’ potential as a game-changing treatment option for knee osteoarthritis. This type of treatment seeks to regenerate damaged tissue, treating the problem directly instead of seeking only to relieve symptoms. However, the availability of robust data from well-designed randomised controlled trials has been limited, particularly in comparison to the gold-standard of treatment for knee osteoarthritis (OA), corticosteroid injections (CSI).

Characterised by extensive damage to joints and debilitating pain, knee OA affects millions of people worldwide is the most common cause of chronic knee pain and has long posed a substantial clinical and economic burden.

In spite of advances in diagnosis, medications, and short-term pain management solutions, the elusive goal of a disease-modifying OA drug has remained out of reach. In recent years though, the use of stem cell therapy has gained traction as a promising alternative to surgery and for improving patients’ quality of life.  

The initial findings of this study describe a first-of-its-kind randomized clinical trial to identify the most effective source of cellular injections for knee OA. The research team compared three types of cellular preparations, including autologous bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC), autologous stromal vascular fraction (SVF), and allogenic human umbilical cord tissue MSCs (UCT) against CSI. The primary outcome measures were the visual analogue scale (VAS) and the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) for pain from baseline to one year. The question driving the research was whether cell therapies could outperform corticosteroids in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis at the one-year mark.

While the findings showed each group had a measurable improvement in pain and function, there was no significant advantage to using any of the tested cell products compared to the gold standard anti-inflammatory corticosteroid treatment at the 12-month follow-up regarding the change in VAS pain score from baseline. Similarly, the analysis of the KOOS pain score produced consistent results, with no significant differences between groups at the 12-month mark in the change in score from baseline.

“The study demonstrated no superiority of any cell therapy over corticosteroids in reducing pain intensity over the course of a year,” says Scott D. Boden, MD, director of the Emory Orthopaedics and Spine Center, and a senior author on the study. “While there is much enthusiasm about the regenerative capacity of stem cells, the findings call into question the comparative effectiveness of various injections for knee osteoarthritis and underscores the importance of a personalised approach in selecting the right treatment for each patient’s unique needs.”

The study’s extensive reach also extended to evaluating the safety of these procedures measuring every adverse reaction, ranging from mild joint discomfort and swelling to unrelated hospitalisations. Importantly, the study found no study-related serious adverse events or symptomatic knee infections across any of the treatment groups at any point during the follow-up.

According to Dr Boden, future papers from the ongoing analysis of our data will determine if certain subgroups of patients might preferentially benefit from one of these treatments more than another. The findings offer an important step forward in answering key questions about the comparative effectiveness of certain OA treatment options, but more in-depth analysis using MRIs and cellular analysis of each injectate will continue to help inform standards of care.

Source: Emory University

Joint Loading may Predict Knee Osteoarthritis after ACL Surgery

Knee pain
Source: CC0

Arthritis in the knee’s patellofemoral joint (PFJ) is common following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and may be linked with altered loading at the joint. In a study published in the Journal of Orthopaedic Research, young adults post‐ACLR who exhibited lower PFJ loading during hopping were more likely to have PFJ osteoarthritis at one year and worsening PFJ osteoarthritis between one and five years post-procedure.

In the study, data for net PFJ contact force were normalised to each participant’s body weight. For every one body weight decrease in the peak PFJ contact force during hopping, the proportion of people at one year post-ACLR with early PFJ osteoarthritis increased by 37%, and the risk of worsening PFJ osteoarthritis between one and five years post-ACLR increased by 55%.

“Clinical interventions aimed at mitigating osteoarthritis progression may be beneficial for those with signs of lower PFJ loading post-ACLR,” the authors wrote.

Source: Wiley

An Effective Short-term Therapy for Knee Osteoarthritis

Knee pain
Source: CC0

With few solutions available, treatment of knee osteoarthritis is challenging, but a randomised control trial published in Arthritis and Rheumatology has found that, at least for short-term relief, ultrasound-guided genicular nerve block (GNB) was effective.

The global prevalence of knee osteoarthritis (OA) is ~22.9% of over-40s. Knee OA is a significant cause disability and potentially loss of independence. Treatment remains challenging, with nonsurgical management options such as education, weight loss, exercise therapy, and walking aids. Few recommended pharmacotherapeutic options exist for knee OA, with surgical joint replacement being a definitive treatment strategy for patients with severe disease who are unresponsive to conservative care. For many patients, such as people who are frail or elderly or people with complex comorbidities, surgical intervention may not be suitable.

In a 12-week parallel-group, placebo-controlled randomised trial of GNB, patients in the active arm received 3 injections of 5.7 mg celestone chronodose (1ml) and 0.5% bupivacaine (3ml) to the inferomedial, superomedial, and superolateral genicular nerves. Patients in the placebo arm received saline injections. An experienced radiologist or rheumatologist with the assistance of a senior sonographer used ultrasound to locate the nerves.

At baseline and at weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12, patients recorded their pain and disability on self-report scales. Patients in the active group reported improvements in pain scores at 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks with a diminution of the effect over time. 

These results reflect comparator groups, which also reported an effect reduction at 12 weeks.

“This study demonstrates that genicular nerve block is an effective short-term therapy for pain management in people with knee osteoarthritis,” said corresponding author Ernst M. Shanahan, BMBS, MPH, MHPE, PhD, FAFOEM, FRACP, of Flinders University. “We think it may be a useful treatment option for this group of people, in particular those waiting for, or wishing to defer surgery.”