Tag: cancer prevention

Categories : Expert Opinion Metabolic DisordersTags : Leave a comment

No More Sugarcoating It: GLP-1s Are a Powerful Weapon in the War Against Sugar

On By ModernMedia
Photo by Patrick Fore on Unsplash

A new movement in weight management is taking hold in South Africa as the country confronts weight-related illnesses. A powerful class of medication known as GLP-1 therapies is proving highly effective in cutting obesity rates, lowering cancer risk, and improving overall metabolic health. Their growing popularity marks a new frontline in the fight against sugar-driven disease.

A landmark study published in JAMA Oncology has revealed that patients using GLP-1 medications – a class of therapies originally developed for type 2 diabetes – experienced a 17% lower overall risk of cancer.

The data, drawn from over 86 000 patients, showed striking reductions in specific cancers: ovarian cancer risk nearly halved, meningioma cases fell by 31%, and endometrial cancer dropped by 25%.

Dr Tommie Smook, medical practitioner at Dr Smook & Partners (managed by RXME Group), says these findings reinforce the urgent need to fight back against sugar-related disease:

“We are witnessing the medical consequences of unchecked sugar consumption every day in practice. Obesity has become one of the greatest epidemics of our time. If we are serious about safeguarding public health, we must declare a national war on sugar – and GLP-1s are among the most powerful tools we now have to help people reclaim their health.”

What GLP-1s actually do

The body naturally produces GLP-1 – a hormone that regulates blood sugar, appetite, and digestion. GLP-1 medications mimic this process:

            •           They slow stomach emptying,

            •           Reduce hunger and cravings,

            •           Help patients feel satisfied with smaller portions, and

            •           Stabilise blood sugar levels.

The result is sustained weight loss. Clinical trials consistently show patients losing 10-15% of body weight, particularly when therapy is combined with nutrition, exercise, and professional support. In South Africa, several GLP-1s are now formally registered for obesity and chronic weight management.

But the benefits don’t end at weight loss. International studies have demonstrated improvements in cardiovascular health – lowering blood pressure, reducing inflammation, and decreasing the risk of heart attacks and strokes. Emerging evidence also suggests neuroprotective effects, with potential to reduce risks of dementia and Alzheimer’s disease.

From diabetes treatment to disease prevention

“GLP-1s are no longer just diabetes drugs,” says Dr Smook. “They are transforming the way we think about weight, chronic disease, and prevention. When used responsibly under medical guidance, these therapies can change not only waistlines, but lifespans.”

At Dr Smook & Partners, patients gain access to GLP-1 therapy under the supervision of qualified medical doctors. Medications are prepared only through SAHPRA-approved compounding pharmacies, ensuring quality and safety. This is supported by a multidisciplinary team – dietitians, biokineticists, nurses, and sports physicians, providing holistic care.

Here are the five essentials you should consider before starting GLP-1 therapy:

  1. See a doctor first – these medications require proper screening and monitoring.
  2. Think beyond injections – lifestyle, diet, and exercise remain vital.
  3. Expect an adjustment phase – side effects like nausea are usually temporary.
  4. Protect lean muscle – resistance training and adequate protein intake are essential.
  5. Avoid shortcuts – unregulated, black-market products are unsafe and unpredictable.

A turning point for public health

Obesity is a modern epidemic, and sugar is at the heart of it. GLP-1 medications are not a “quick fix,” but they represent one of the most promising advances in decades – a way to tackle both the causes and consequences of excess weight.

Dr Smook concludes: “The stigma around GLP-1s must end. These therapies are not about vanity – they are about survival. Every patient who regains control of their health is one step closer to breaking sugar’s grip on our society.”

Categories : CancerTags :

Study Affirms Efficacy of Nicotinamide for Skin Cancer Prevention 

On By ModernMedia

Overall, there was a 14% reduction in skin cancer risk. When nicotinamide was taken after a first skin cancer, the risk reduction rose to 54%.

3D structure of a melanoma cell derived by ion abrasion scanning electron microscopy. Credit: Sriram Subramaniam/ National Cancer Institute

The dietary supplement nicotinamide has been recommended by dermatologists for people with a history of skin cancer since 2015, when a clinical study with 386 participants showed that those who took the vitamin B3 derivative developed fewer new occurrences. 

But data to validate those findings in a larger study group has been lacking because nicotinamide can be purchased over the counter without being entered into patients’ medical records.

In a new study published in JAMA Dermatology, researchers found a way to get that data by analysing records from the Veterans Affairs Corporate Data Warehouse. Nicotinamide is on the VA’s official formulary, so the researchers checked the outcomes of 33 833 patients for their next skin cancer diagnosis following baseline treatment with 500 milligrams of nicotinamide twice daily for longer than 30 days. They looked for occurrences of basal cell carcinoma and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. 

The researchers compared 12 287 patients who received the treatment with 21 479 who did not. Overall, there was a 14% reduction in skin cancer risk. When nicotinamide was taken after a first skin cancer, the risk reduction rose to 54%, but the benefit declined with treatment initiation following subsequent skin cancers. The risk reduction was much larger for squamous cell carcinoma.  

“There are no guidelines for when to start treatment with nicotinamide for skin cancer prevention in the general population. These results would really shift our practice from starting it once patients have developed numerous skin cancers to starting it earlier. We still need to do a better job of identifying who will actually benefit, as roughly only half of patients will develop multiple skin cancers,” said the study’s corresponding author, Lee Wheless, MD, PhD, assistant professor of Dermatology and Medicine at Vanderbilt University Medical Center and a staff physician at VA Tennessee Valley Healthcare System. 

The researchers were also able to ascertain the outcomes of 1,334 patients who were immunocompromised due to having received solid organ transplants. Among solid organ transplant recipients, no overall significant risk reduction was observed, although early nicotinamide use was associated with reduced occurrences of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. 

Source: Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Categories : Cancer Diet and NutritionTags :

Can Vitamin D Help Prevent Colorectal Cancer?

On By ModernMedia

The science is promising – but not straightforward

Photo by Michele Blackwell on Unsplash

Justin Stebbing, Anglia Ruskin University

The potential role of vitamin D in preventing and treating colorectal cancer (CRC) has attracted growing research interest – especially as CRC rates are rising, particularly among younger adults. This isn’t a new area of study. Low vitamin D levels have long been linked to a higher risk of developing colorectal cancer.

One large study involving over 12 000 participants found that people with low blood levels of vitamin D had a 31% greater risk of developing CRC compared to those with higher levels. Similarly, another study reported a 25% lower CRC risk among individuals with high dietary vitamin D intake.

Data from the Nurses’ Health Study – a long-term investigation of American nurses – showed that women with the highest vitamin D intake had a 58% lower risk of developing colorectal cancer compared to those with the lowest intake.

Now, a review highlights vitamin D’s promise in colorectal cancer prevention and treatment – but also underscores the complexity and contradictions in current research.

While observational data, which follow people’s use of vitamin D, and mechanistic studies, to investigate how vitamin D works in the laboratory, suggest protective effects, this isn’t confirmed by larger trials.

In fact, randomised controlled trials (RCTs), in which some people receive vitamin D and others don’t, the gold standard by which treatments are judged, reveal inconsistent outcomes. This highlights the need for a balanced approach to its integration into public health strategies.

Vitamin D is synthesised in the skin in response to sunlight and exerts its biological effects through vitamin D receptors (VDRs) found throughout the body, including in colon tissue. When activated, these receptors help regulate gene activity related to inflammation, immune response and cell growth – processes central to cancer development and progression.

Preclinical studies have shown that the active form of vitamin D (calcitriol) can suppress inflammation, boost immune surveillance (the immune system’s ability to detect abnormal cells), inhibit tumour blood vessel growth and regulate cell division – a key factor in cancer development, as demonstrated in my recent research.

Epidemiological studies, which track health outcomes across large populations over time, consistently find that people with higher blood levels of vitamin D have a lower risk of developing CRC. This paints a hopeful picture, suggesting that something as simple as getting more vitamin D – via sun exposure, diet, or supplements – could lower cancer risk.

But the story gets more complicated.

Mixed results

When it comes to medical decision-making, randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are the gold standard. These studies randomly assign participants to receive either a treatment (like vitamin D) or a placebo, helping eliminate bias and isolate cause-and-effect relationships.

Unfortunately, RCTs on vitamin D and CRC have produced mixed results.

For example, the VITAL trial – a major RCT involving over 25 000 participants – found no significant reduction in overall colorectal cancer incidence with 2000 IU/day of vitamin D supplementation over several years.

However, a meta-analysis of seven RCTs did show a 30% improvement in CRC survival rates with vitamin D supplements, suggesting potential benefits later in the disease course rather than for prevention.

On the other hand, the Vitamin D/Calcium Polyp Prevention Trial found no reduction in the recurrence of adenomas (pre-cancerous growths) with supplementation, raising questions about who benefits most, and at what dosage.

Adding to the uncertainty is the question of causation. Does low vitamin D contribute to cancer development? Or does the onset of cancer reduce vitamin D levels in the body? It’s also possible that the observed benefits are partly due to increased sunlight exposure, which itself may have independent protective effects.

The big picture

These discrepancies highlight the importance of considering the “totality of evidence” – treating each study as one piece of a larger puzzle.

The biologic plausibility is there. Observational and mechanistic studies suggest a meaningful link between vitamin D and lower CRC risk. But the clinical evidence isn’t yet strong enough to recommend vitamin D as a standalone prevention or treatment strategy.

That said, maintaining sufficient vitamin D levels – at least 30ng/mL – is a low-risk, cost-effective health measure. And when combined with other strategies like regular screening, a healthy diet, physical activity, and personalised care, vitamin D could still play a valuable role in overall cancer prevention.

Vitamin D is not a miracle cure – but it is part of a much broader picture. Its role in colorectal cancer is promising but still being defined. While it’s not time to rely on supplements alone, ensuring adequate vitamin D levels – through sun exposure, diet, or supplements – remains a smart choice for your health.

Colorectal cancer is a complex disease, and tackling it requires an equally nuanced approach. For now, that means focusing on evidence-based lifestyle changes, regular screenings, and staying informed as new research unfolds.

Justin Stebbing, Professor of Biomedical Sciences, Anglia Ruskin University

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Categories : CancerTags :

Statin Therapy May Prevent Cancer by Blocking Inflammatory Protein

On By ModernMedia
Lung cancer metastasis. Credit: National Cancer Institute

A new study led by investigators from Mass General Cancer Center, a founding member of the Mass General Brigham healthcare system, reveals that statins may block a particular pathway involved in the development of cancer that results from chronic inflammation. The findings are published in Nature Communications.

“Chronic inflammation is a major cause of cancer worldwide,” said senior author Shawn Demehri, MD, PhD. “We investigated the mechanism by which environmental toxins drive the initiation of cancer-prone chronic inflammation in the skin and pancreas. Furthermore, we examined safe and effective therapies to block this pathway in order to suppress chronic inflammation and its cancer aftermath.”

Demehri and his colleagues’ study relied on cell lines, animal models, human tissue samples and epidemiological data. The group’s cell-based experiments demonstrated that environmental toxins (such as exposure to allergens and chemical irritants) activate two connected signaling pathways called the TLR3/4 and TBK1-IRF3 pathways. This activation leads to the production of the interleukin-33 (IL-33) protein, which stimulates inflammation in the skin and pancreas that can contribute to the development of cancer.

When they screened a library of U.S. Food and Drug Administration–approved drugs, the researchers found that a statin, pitavastatin, effectively suppresses IL-33 expression by blocking the activation of the TBK1-IRF3 signalling pathway. In mice, pitavastatin suppressed environmentally-induced inflammation in the skin and the pancreas and prevented the development of inflammation-related pancreatic cancers.

In human pancreas tissue samples, IL-33 was over-expressed in samples from patients with chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer compared with normal pancreatic tissue. Also, in analyses of electronic health records data on more than 200 million people across North America and Europe, use of pitavastatin was linked to a significantly reduced risk of chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer.

The findings demonstrate that blocking IL-33 production with pitavastatin may be a safe and effective preventive strategy to suppress chronic inflammation and the subsequent development of certain cancers.

“Next, we aim to further examine the impact of statins in preventing cancer development in chronic inflammation in liver and gastrointestinal tract and to identify other novel, therapeutic approaches to suppress cancer-prone chronic inflammation” said Demehri.

Source: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Categories : CancerTags :

Daily Vitamin D Could Reduce Cancer Mortality

On By ModernMedia

Vitamin D intake could reduce cancer mortality in the population by 12% – provided the vitamin is taken daily. This was the result of an evaluation of 14 studies of the highest quality conducted at the German Cancer Research Center with a total of almost 105 000 participants.

Vitamin D deficiency is widespread worldwide and is particularly common among cancer patients. Averaged over the year, the vitamin D blood levels of about 15% of German adults are below the threshold for a pronounced vitamin D deficiency*. In contrast, in a study of colorectal cancer patients, researchers diagnosed vitamin D3 deficiency in 59% of participants, which was also associated with unfavourable prognosis.

Potential effects of vitamin D supplementation and the development or prognosis of cancer have already been investigated in numerous studies. “Based on current studies, vitamin D3 supplementation probably does not protect against developing cancer, but it could reduce the likelihood of dying from cancer. However, previous studies on cancer mortality have yielded very different results, and we were interested in the reasons for this,” said Ben Schöttker, an epidemiologist at the German Cancer Research Center. “By re-evaluating all previous studies on the topic, we wanted to help produce robust results on this issue, which is so relevant to population health.

To investigate the effectiveness of vitamin D3 on cancer mortality in the population and on the survival of cancer patients, Ben Schöttker and colleagues conducted a systematic literature search that identified 14 studies with a total of nearly 105 000 participants. The researchers considered only studies of the highest quality whose participants had been randomly assigned to the vitamin D3 arm or the placebo arm.

When all 14 studies were pooled, no statistically significant results emerged. However, when the studies were divided according to whether vitamin D3 was taken daily in a low dose** or in higher doses administered at longer intervals**, a large difference was seen. In the four studies with the infrequent higher doses, there was no effect on cancer mortality. In contrast, in the summary of the ten studies with daily dosing, the researchers determined a statistically significant twelve percent reduction in cancer mortality.

“We observed this twelve percent reduction in cancer mortality after untargeted vitamin D3 administration to individuals with and without vitamin D deficiency. We can therefore assume that the effect is significantly higher for those people who are actually vitamin D deficient,” says Ben Schöttker. He explains the better efficacy of daily doses of vitamin D3 by the more regular bioavailability of the active agent, the hormone 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D, which is only produced by reactions of vitamin D in the body and can presumably inhibit tumor growth.

A more detailed analysis of the studies with daily intake further revealed that people aged 70 and older benefited most from vitamin D3 therapy. In addition, the effect was most evident when vitamin D intake was started before the cancer diagnosis.

Hermann Brenner, epidemiologist and prevention expert at DKFZ, adds: “This work underlines the great potential of vitamin D3 administration in the prevention of cancer deaths. Regular intake at low doses** is associated with almost negligible risk and very low cost.”

* The threshold blood 25-hydroxyvitamin D level used for vitamin D deficiency was 30 nmol/L (= 12 ng/ml). If individuals with less severe vitamin D deficiency (blood 25-hydroxyvitamin D level < 50 nmol/L (= 20 ng/mL)) are added, slightly more than half of Germans have at least one deficiency. However, there are also guidelines that use other thresholds. Since the vitamin D level in the blood depends primarily on the tanning of the skin, this percentage also varies greatly with the seasons.

** In the studies, daily low doses were 400 to 4000 IU per day, and higher-doses administered at longer intervals were 60 000 to 120 000 IU once per month or less.

Source: German Cancer Research Center