Tag: Africa

Categories : COVIDTags :

African Scientists Show How COVID Variants Spread across Africa

On By ModernMedia
Source: Fusion Medical Animation on Unsplash

A major scientific report from Africa is featured in the journal Science today. This scientific report shows how the rapid expansion of genomics surveillance in Africa allowed the continent to describe the introduction and spread of the SARS-CoV-2 variants in African countries in real time during the COVID pandemic.

The scientific report includes over 300 authors from Africa and abroad who worked together to describe and analyse over 100 000 genomes and characterise SARS-CoV-2 variants in real time. This was the largest consortium of African scientists and public health institutions ever to work together to support data-driven COVID response in Africa.

This report shows how the large investment, collaboration and capacity building in genomic surveillance on the African continent enabled real-time public health response. Particularly it describes the setting up of the Africa Centres for Disease Control (CDC) – Africa Pathogen Genomics Initiative (Africa PGI) and the continental network by the Africa CDC and World Health Organisation (WHO) Regional Office for Africa (WHO AFRO) to expand access to sequencing and cover surveillance blind spots, in parallel with the growth of the number of countries that are able to sequence SARS-CoV-2 within their own country.

“The publication highlights that sustained investment for diagnostics and genomic surveillance in Africa was needed to not only combat SARS-CoV-2 on the continent, but establish a platform to address the emerging, re-emerging, endemic infectious disease threats, such as Ebola, HIV/AIDS, TB and Malaria. These investments are crucial for pandemic preparedness and response and will serve the health of the continent well into the 21st century,” said Dr. Yenew Kebede, Head Division of Laboratory Systems and Acting Head: Surveillance and Disease Intelligence at the Africa CDC.

African Scientists receiving training in genomics surveillance at the KwaZulu-Natal Research Innovation and Sequencing Platform (KRISP), South Africa.

This study was led by two labs that setup the network for genomics surveillance in South Africa – the Centre for Epidemic Response and Innovation (CERI) at Stellenbosch University and the KwaZulu Natal Research and Innovation Sequencing Platform (KRISP) at the University of KwaZulu-Natal, in close coordination with the Africa CDC, WHO AFRO and 300 other institutions across the continent.
 
“The enormous leap Africa made in genomic surveillance during the past two years is the silver lining in the COVID pandemic,” said Dr Matshidiso Moeti, WHO Regional Director for Africa. “The continent is now better prepared to face down both old and emerging pathogens. This is a model of how when Africans are in the driving seat we can come up with lasting change and stay a step ahead of dangerous diseases.”
 
“It has been an inspiring experience to continuously share knowledge, support and learn from colleagues all over the continent during the pandemic. We witnessed small countries with no previous genomics experience become empowered in sequencing and bioinformatics methods, and how they started to actively participate in regular pathogen genomic surveillance for SARS-CoV-2. I think it will be a real model of how scientists and public health officials across countries can form a unified front against infectious diseases in the future,” says Houriiyah Tegally, Bioinformatician at KRISP and CERI and first author on this report.
 
The results also highlight the early warning capacity that genomic surveillance in Africa has had for the rest of the world with the detection of new lineages and variants, the most relevant being the detection of the Beta and various Omicron subvariants. The report highlights that most SARS-CoV-2 variants, which caused  an epidemic in Africa, were introduced from abroad.

The scientists proceeded carefully in analysing genomic and epidemiological data collected in over 50 countries that experienced quite heterogenous epidemics in order to reconstruct transmission dynamics of the virus in the most accurate way. “The phylogeographic methods that we employ to investigate the movement of the SARS-CoV-2 virus and its variants into, out of, and within the African continent account for uneven testing and sampling proportions across countries, arising from the realities of doing genomic sequencing in the middle of a pandemic, often in low resourced settings,” explains Dr Eduan Wilkinson, head of bioinformatics at CERI at Stellenbosch University and senior author on this report.
 
The initial waves of infections in Africa were primarily seeded by multiple introductions of viral lineages from abroad (mainly Europe). The Alpha variant that emerged in Europe at the end of 2020, was responsible for infections in 43 countries with evidence of community transmission in Ghana, Nigeria, Kenya, Gabon and Angola. For the Delta variant, the bulk of introductions were attributed to India (~72%), mainland Europe (~8%), the UK (~5%), and the US (~2.5%). Viral introductions of Delta also occurred between African countries in 7% of inferred introduction. For Omicron, the scientific results indicate more reintroductions of the variant back into Africa, with at least 69 (95% CI: 60 – 78) from Europe and 102 (95% CI: 92 – 112) from North America than from other African countries. This was amplified for Omicron BA.2; the results suggest at least 99 separate introduction or reintroduction events of BA.2 into African countries, ~65% of which are from Europe and ~30% from Asia.
 
“The ironical part of these results is that most of the introductions of variants in Africa were from abroad, but Africa was the most discriminated and penalized continent in the world with travel bans imposed. Instead of unscientific and inappropriate reactions, we should be building on the infrastructure established in Africa so that the continent can rapidly pivot to other epidemics without the fear of being punished,” says Prof Tulio de Oliveira, director of CERI and KRISP, which lead the consortium analysis with the Africa CDC and WHO AFRO.
 
“This study is a testament of the Africa CDC – Africa PGI efforts to expand access to sequencing to member states and create a platform of coordination and collaboration among institutions within and outside of the continent,” said Dr. Ahmed Ogwell, Acting Director of the Africa CDC.

Provided by Stellenbosch University

Categories : COVID Healthcare Politics and RegulationsTags :

Debunking the Myth that Africa Responded Well to COVID

On By ModernMedia
COVID heat map. Photo by Giacomo Carra on Unsplash

By Nathan Geffen and Francois Venter

There is a view being promoted that COVID didn’t hit Africa as badly as the rest of the world. The reason for this, as recently expressed in an article by Boniface Oyugi in The Conversation, was the effective and well-coordinated response of African governments.

We understand the desire to find good news on the continent. But, on balance, the very little evidence available shows that COVID has hit Africa hard. The continent is highly diverse with over 50 states, so broad generalisations should be treated cautiously but, with an exception or two, there is little evidence of an effective response to the COVID pandemic. For one thing, Africa has the lowest vaccination rate of any continent.

Oyugi uses the WHO’s official COVID infection and death statistics to claim that the continent fared better than elsewhere. These state that as of late July, less than 2% of global cases and less than 3% of global deaths occurred in Africa, which has about 17% of the world’s population. (Oyugi also cites a study which pretty much says the same thing.)

COVID test statistics and confirmed COVID deaths don’t paint an accurate picture of how seriously the pandemic has hit a country (see here). If you don’t measure something properly, you can’t conclude that it’s a small problem. COVID tests are typically only administered with any regularity to a small, predominantly better off, part of a country’s population, and countries that test more tend to find more cases. Official COVID death tolls typically count people who have died in hospital with a confirmed positive test result. But it often doesn’t happen this way, especially on a continent with large rural populations and under-resourced hospitals.

Excess deaths: a vital measure

This is why the most important measure of how hard COVID has hit a country is the excess death toll. By excess deaths, we mean the number of deaths that occurred above what you’d expect given recent historical mortality. In sub-Saharan Africa, the only country that has a system capable of reliably estimating this is South Africa. Every week since the beginning of the epidemic, the Medical Research Council (MRC), using death certificate data provided by Home Affairs, has diligently analysed excess deaths. (Many countries wealthier than South Africa do not have as good a system, so it’s something to be proud of.)

The MRC researchers calculate that there have been over 320 000 excess deaths in South Africa since May 2020 (as of July 2022). As they’ve explained, conservatively 85% of these are COVID deaths. It may be as high as 95%. We can conclude that close to 300 000 people have died of COVID in South Africa. Over the past two years about 1 in 200 people in the country have died of this new infection.

The Economist has been reporting excess deaths by country. It states: “Among developing countries that do produce regular mortality statistics, South Africa shows the grimmest picture, after recording three large spikes of fatalities.”

Official deaths are much lower than excess deaths

But if you look at South Africa’s official, and much less accurate, COVID death toll you get a very different picture: Then we’re only 65th worst in the world (source: Worldometer deaths per million people). Lesotho is in 167th place, suggesting it has had a very small epidemic. Is it plausible that an area with a porous border entirely surrounded by South Africa has a completely different epidemic? (See this set of tweets – by one of the authors of South Africa’s weekly mortality report – that explains how the little mortality data we have from Lesotho suggests it had a serious pandemic.)

What about Namibia at position 74 in the Worldometer list, Botswana at 89, Zimbabwe at position 143 and Mozambique at position 190? Is it plausible that this ordering, almost in reverse order of industrial development, accurately reflects how these countries were affected by COVID?

Depending on your bias, you can approach these statistics in two ways. You can be very optimistic and see this as evidence of a smaller epidemic in sub-Saharan Africa. Or you can be realistic and acknowledge that the official numbers are likely very badly undercounted.

We can’t know for sure though because nearly all African governments did not have the systems in place to count excess deaths.

Most African countries need much better death registration systems

Attempts to estimate excess mortality in most African countries are based on almost no data. To the extent that there is data, it supports the view that the numbers have been badly undercounted. For example, a study published in the British Medical Journal, albeit with many caveats, found death rates in developing countries were twice those of rich countries.

During the height of the AIDS pandemic in the 2000s there was much optimism that the massive influx of foreign aid in response could be used to build better health systems. Bits and pieces of evidence do suggest health on the continent has improved. But it’s very disappointing that most countries on the continent still do not have the vital registration systems in place to measure mortality with decent accuracy. This is one of the most important measures of how a population is doing.

By claiming that African governments have responded well to COVID, when there’s no proper evidence to support this, we fail to hold politicians accountable. We also create the impression that institutions like the World Health Organisation and the African Union’s African Centre for Disease Control are more successful than they’ve actually been. This is a disservice to the vast majority of people living in Africa.

Geffen is GroundUp’s editor. Professor Venter is an infectious diseases clinician and head of Ezintsha at Wits University.

This article is republished from GroundUp under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Source: GroundUp

Categories : Healthcare Politics and RegulationsTags :

Renewed Political Will Needed for the Complexities of African Healthcare

On By ModernMedia
Delegates at the 21st Annual Board of Healthcare Funders (BHF) Conference currently being held in Cape Town.

19 May 2022: Healthcare – Cape Town, South Africa: The healthcare system in South Africa and on the continent is beset with structural challenges and skewed political priorities that hamper the attainment of universal healthcare coverage, therefore a fundamental overhaul of the healthcare system and renewed political will is required to improve citizen’s access to quality healthcare services.

These sentiments kicked off the first day of the 21st Annual Board of Healthcare Funders (BHF) Conference currently being held in Cape Town under the theme: Leading change in strengthening our healthcare ecosystem.

Connected virtually, South Africa’s Minister of Health, Dr Joe Phaahla invited the private sector to submit recommended solutions to strengthen the country’s healthcare systems, emphasising the need for a collaborative approach to transform healthcare.

Dr Phaahla conceded that the health system in the country was already weak before the outbreak of COVID and inequality in access to reliable health services is inextricably linked to the economic and social inequality that our country is facing.

The Minister added, “The country’s healthcare system should be restructured to focus more on preventative services rather than the current curative approach.”

“The socio-economic inequality is perpetuated further by our own health services, which are highly heavily commodified. Our two-tiered healthcare system with one being driven by the private sector for a few who can afford it and the other by the public sector being provided for the majority of the population does not bode well for the future prospects of the country. This system is unsustainable and if we are going to talk about a change in strengthening the health system, we cannot avoid talking about the need to accelerate the creation of a more equitable health system.” 

He acknowledged that the passing of the NHI Bill will not in itself be a silver bullet in the transformation of our health system, however, will lay a good foundation for the country to timely start to fundamentally transform our health system towards equity.

Speaking about the relationship between politics and healthcare, Professor Patrick Lumumba, former Director of the Kenya Anti-Corruption Commission, said, “Politics is at the very heart of the provision of sound healthcare systems.”

He challenged some of the perceptions around the delivery of national healthcare insurance across Africa, asking governments and the private sector to closely examine suitable healthcare solutions that will consider the continent’s current different types of conflicts.

He highlighted that considerations should be made in the best interest of the continent’s populations when making the decision on an approach to be taken for the continent’s healthcare needs, bearing in mind what is affordable to the different countries across the continent, especially given that the continent’s entire GDP is less than that of Italy, which has just under 60 million people.

“The continent is currently under different types of conflict at various intensities, and these conflicts are in turn undermining the provision of healthcare,” said Prof Lumumba.

He noted that in Africa, there is a lack of political will to spend more on healthcare despite the commitments made at Abuja, Nigeria, in 2001 to invest a minimum of 15% of their national budget in healthcare.

“Politicians are rich in making promises. The evidence we have in different countries is that universal health care as promised by politicians and as desired by the population is not easily achievable,” he said.

He cautioned against the temptation to compare the healthcare system in Africa with that of developed countries, citing a lower tax base and GDP in Africa to fund a healthcare system that services a substantially larger population.

“The entire GDP of Africa is slightly over two trillion US dollars, which is smaller than the GDP of Spain, which has a population of no more than 50 million people, it is critical that the private and public sectors; and politicians work together to come up with a system that is going to be beneficial to the majority of Africa’s people,” said Professor Lumumba.

He said the envisaged economic revival of Africa cannot be sustained if the continent’s healthcare needs are not adequately addressed.

“If the continent of Africa is to enjoy the perceived economic growth that is expected, then the population must be healthy. Healthcare is about creating healthcare systems that are also able to retain the skills that are required for Africa’s emerging or growing economies. There is also a clear need for collaboration in the delivery of health services,” said Lumumba.

Dr Millicent Hlatshwayo Chairperson of the Government Employees Medical Scheme (GEMS) reiterated the need for the private healthcare sector to play a meaningful role towards shaping the proposed healthcare funding model to ensure its sustainability.

She acknowledged that the healthcare sector is faced with several systemic challenges, and this is reflected in our international rankings; where South Africa ranks 49th out of 89 countries on the 2022 Global Healthcare Index. Though South Africa is the highest-ranked African country in this index, it has been rated below its peers in BRICS such as China and India, which are rated 40th and 44th respectively.

Dr Hlatshwayo said, “Proposed reforms such as the implementation of the NHI can help to facilitate better cooperation between the public and private sectors. We cannot afford to be passive observers in these deliberations, because our failure to act on these opportunities will be an indictment on the industry.”

Dr Hlatshwayo said from its inception, GEMS has been aligned with the transformation of the healthcare industry and supportive of the principles of universal health coverage.

She said universal health coverage can only be achieved if we get the basics in place, namely qualified staff, equipment and technology, infrastructure and working systems.

Categories : COVID PaediatricsTags :

High COVID Mortality Rate Found in African Children and Adolescents

On By ModernMedia
Photo by Roman Nguyen on Unsplash

African children and adolescents hospitalised with COVID experience much higher mortality rates than Europeans or North Americans of the same age, according to a recent six-country study which included South Africa.

The study, published in JAMA Pediatrics. was conducted by researchers from the Institute of Human Virology (IHV) at the University of Maryland School of Medicine (UMSOM) and the Institute of Human Virology Nigeria (IHVN). Both organisations are members of the Global Virus Network (GVN).

“This study provides important information about COVID among African children, which was not previously available at this scale. We now have evidence from multiple countries to show that African children also experience severe COVID; they experience multisystem inflammatory syndrome; some require intensive care; some also die, and at much higher rates than outside Africa,” said co-first author Nadia Sam-Agudu, MD, Associate Professor of Pediatrics at the UMSOM’s Institute of Human Virology.

The AFREhealth study collected data from 25 health facilities across Nigeria, Ghana, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Kenya, South Africa, and Uganda. The study included 469 African children and adolescents aged three months to 19 years hospitalised with COVID between March and December 2020. The team reported a high overall mortality rate of 8.3%, compared with 1% or less totaled from Europe and North America. Furthermore, African children less than a year old and with pre-existing, non-communicable diseases were more likely to have poorer outcomes.

Eighteen participants had suspected or confirmed multisystem inflammatory syndrome (also known as MIS-C), and four of these children died.

Dr Sam-Agudu, who led the West Africa team for the study, urged health authorities and policymakers in Nigeria and other African countries to act upon the study findings “to protect children by expanding vaccine approvals and procurements for children specifically, as the variants emerging since our study’s completion have either caused more severe disease and/or more cases overall. We cannot leave children behind in the pandemic response.”

Source: University of Maryland

Categories : COVID Diseases, Syndromes and ConditionsTags :

Is Malaria Behind Low COVID Burden in Sub-Saharan Africa?

On By ModernMedia
Mosquito
Photo by Егор Камелев on Unsplash

In both rural and urban areas of Mali, there was a high seroprevalence of COVID, but a low burden of symptomatic disease, a researcher said in a presentation at the American Society of Tropical Medicine & Hygiene (ASTMH) virtual meeting. This could be tentatively attributable to the prevalence of malaria.

From spring to autumn (northern hemisphere) 2020, the seropositivity rate among those with self-reported symptoms jumped from 20.8% to 48.6%, while those reporting symptoms but were seronegative also increased from 9.8% to 49.3% in the cohort, reported John Woodford, MD, of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID).

However, he said that during March to July, the COVID-attributable fraction was 11%, and from August to December, the COVID-attributable fraction was 0%.

In addition, the percentage of seropositive people with symptomatic illness over the background illness reporting rate was 0%-11%, well below the age-adjusted 33% of cases expected, based on the US case rate.

Only three hospitalisations occurred throughout spring and autumn 2020, also far below the expected 11-30 hospitalisations, and no deaths.

Dr Woodford pointed to “a lot of anecdotal reports that there was a limited disease burden in Mali.”

“It was repeated over and over again for a variety of sub-Saharan African settings, but there’s very limited data to back this up,” he clarified.

His group performed a serosurvey of urban and rural areas of Mali, using two-antigen ELISA qualified for use in that country. Participants were also given a questionnaire asking about self-reported symptoms, medical, and social history.

Overall, they obtained serosurvey data from 3671 participants at four sites, who were a median age of 15. They noted the dates of the symptom questionnaires were March to July 2020 and August to December 2020.

No symptoms were independently associated with seropositivity, Dr Woodford said. There was no greater change of seropositive people being absent from work, seeking medical care, or being hospitalised compared to seronegative people in the cohort during spring. However they were more likely to seek medical care in the autumn than seronegative people (63.4% vs 45.9%, respectively).
The second follow-up visit was during the malaria season, when there was a high percentage of seropositivity, but the proportion of those with self-reported symptoms was comparable with background illness. MedPage Today asked Dr Woodford as to whether malaria infection might have a protective effect, to which he responded: “That is a question much larger than me, and much larger than COVID.” He added that the rural areas in their study had higher rates of malaria than the urban sites, while the reverse was true for COVID.

“What that means, I’m not sure, but there’s certainly a blunt association there,” Dr Woodford noted.

He referenced a recent study of hospitalised patients in Uganda, which found that patients with low previous malaria exposure had higher risk of severe or critical COVID clinical presentation compared to those with high previous exposure, even among patients with no comorbidities.

However, Dr Woodford explained that without a much larger sample size and more accurate tests such as PCR, there was no way to tease out asymptomatic versus symptomatic infections.
“You’d need a very large population to look at symptomatic versus asymptomatic in seropositive patients,” he said. “Logistically, it’s a very challenging study to put together.”

Source: MedPage Today

Categories : GeneticsTags :

The Need for an African Genetic Library

On By ModernMedia
Source: Mart Production on Pexels

Earlier this year, UCT professor Ambroise Wonkam published the Three Million African Genomes (3MAG) project in Nature, which he said started with a “crazy idea”. Now, it looks like his vision is starting to take shape.

The idea of creating a huge library of genetic information about the population of Africa emerged from his work on how genetic mutations among Africans contribute to conditions like sickle-cell disease and hearing impairments.

African genes contain great genetic variation, more than that seen outside of Africa. As he explained, “We are all African but only a small fraction of Africans moved out of Africa about 20–40 000 years ago and settled in Europe and in Asia.”

Another concern for Prof Wonkam is equity, saying: “Too little of the knowledge and applications from genomics have benefited the global south because of inequalities in health-care systems, a small local research workforce and lack of funding.”

Thus far only about 2% of genomes mapped are African, a good proportion of which are African American. This stes from a lack of prioritising funding, policies and training infrastructure, he says, but it also means the understanding of genetic medicine as a whole is lopsided. By studying African genomes, injustics can be corrected, such as finding that genetic risk profiles based on Europeans could be misleading for those of African descent.

To address these disparities, Prof Wonkam and other scientists are speaking to governments, companies and professional bodies across Africa and internationally, in order to build up capacity over the next decade to make the vision a reality.

He expects three million is the number needed to accurately map genetic variations across Africa. The project will take a decade, he says, costing around $450m per year, with industry already showing interest. 

Biotech firms welcome prospects of new data
The Centre for Proteomic and Genomic Research (CPGR) in Cape Town works with biotech firm Artisan Biomed on a variety of diagnostic tests. Gaps in the applicability of genetic data to the local population are a challenge for the firm, it said.

A genetic mutation in someone could be found but it would be uncertain if that variation is associated with a disease, especially as a marker for that particular population.

“The more information you have at that level, the better the diagnosis, treatment and eventually care can be for any individual, regardless of your ethnicity,” said Dr Lindsay Petersen, the company’s chief operations officer.

Artisan Biomed says the data it collects feeds back into CPGR’s research – allowing them to design a better diagnostic toolkit that is better suited to African populations, for instance.

Dr Judith Hornby Cuff said that the 3MAG project would help streamline processes and improve research, and one day could provide cheaper, more effective and more accessible health care, particularly in the strained South African system.

Prof Wonkam acknowledged that while the costs are huge, the project will “improve capacity in a whole range of biomedical disciplines that will equip Africa to tackle public-health challenges more equitably”.

“We have to be ambitious when we are in Africa. You have so many challenges you cannot see small, you have to see big – and really big,” he said.

Source: BBC News

Categories : COVIDTags :

COVID Hit South Africa Harder Than Expected Despite Preparedness

On By ModernMedia
Image by Quicknews

New research finds African countries, assessed as being least vulnerable to an epidemic were the worst affected by COVID, particularly South Africa.

A team of researchers from the NIHR Global Health Research Unit Tackling Infections to Benefit Africa (TIBA) worked with the World Health Organization (WHO) African Region to identify factors affecting mortality rates during Africa’s first two COVID waves and the timing of the first reported cases. The study, published in the journal Nature Medicine, found that countries with greater urban populations and strong international travel links were worst affected by the pandemic. Mortality rates and levels of restrictions, such as lockdowns and travel bans, were found to be lowest in countries previously thought to be at greatest risk from COVID.

Professor Mark Woolhouse, TIBA Director, who co-led the study, said, “Our study shows very clearly that multiple factors influence the extent to which African countries are affected by COVID. These findings challenge our understanding of vulnerability to pandemics.

“Our results show that we should not equate high levels of preparedness and resilience with low vulnerability.

“That seemingly well-prepared, resilient countries have fared worst during the pandemic is not only true in Africa; the result is consistent with a global trend that more developed countries have often been particularly hard hit by COVID.”

Among 44 countries of the WHO African Region with available data, South Africa had the highest mortality rate during the first wave between May and August 2020, at 33.3 deaths recorded per 100k population. Cape Verde and Eswatini had the next highest rates at 17.5 and 8.6 deaths per 100k, respectively. At 0.26 deaths recorded per 100,000, the lowest mortality rate was in Uganda.

South Africa also recorded the highest mortality rate during the second wave between December 2020 and February 2021, at 55.4 deaths per 100,000. Eswatini and Botswana recorded rates of 39.8 and 17.7 deaths per 100,000, respectively. The lowest rate was in Mauritius, which recorded no deaths during the second wave.

“The early models which predicted how COVID would lead to a massive number of cases in Africa were largely the work of institutions not from our continent. This collaboration between researchers in Africa and Europe underlines the importance of anchoring analysis on Africa’s epidemics firmly here,” said Dr. Matshidiso Moeti, WHO Regional Director for Africa and co-author. “We can no longer focus our understanding of disease transmission purely on the characteristics of a virus—COVID operates within a social context which has a major impact on its spread.”

Countries with high rates of HIV were also more likely to have higher mortality rates. This may be because people with HIV often have other health conditions that put them at greater risk from COVID, the team suggests.

The weak association between mortality rate and the timing or severity of government-imposed social restrictions shows the varied impact and enforcement across the region, making a consistent impact pattern difficult to discern. Restrictions during peaks of infection are well documented to have interrupted transmission in the region.

The findings show that the earliest recorded cases of COVID were in countries where most people live in urban areas, with strong international travel links and greater testing capacity. Algeria was the first of 47 African countries to report a case, on 25 February 2020. Most countries had recorded cases by late March 2020, with Lesotho the last to report one, on 14 May 2020.

Higher death rates were observed during the second wave, compared with the first. The infection peak during the second wave was also higher, with 675 deaths across the continent on 18 January 2021 compared with 323 during the first wave peak on 5 August 2020. Potential under-reporting was accounted for in the analysis.

Source: University of Edinburgh

Categories : COVIDTags :

Europe to Return Millions of Locally-filled J&J Vaccines

On By ModernMedia

The European Union has agreed to return millions of COVID vaccines doses partially produced in South Africa back to the African continent.

South Africa’s Aspen Pharmacare operates the plant that is partially producing Johnson & Johnson vaccines, where vaccine substance from Europe is sent to be bottled and shipped.

The plant is supposed to produce 400 million doses for the AU’s African Vaccine Acquisition Trust through 2022, to be purchased by African nations using World Bank financing. Shipments started in August, with 6.4 million doses delivered to countries, but they have been limited due to the manufacturing plant’s production capacity.

The announcement came as Africa struggles to immunise its population against COVID, partly due to a lack of supply resulting from wealthier countries buying up most vaccines, and also from widespread vaccine hesitancy. 

“All the vaccines produced at Aspen will stay in Africa and be distributed to Africa,” said Strive Masiyiwa, special African Union envoy. “This issue has been corrected and corrected in a very positive way.”

The announcement came after a meeting in Berlin between South African President Cyril Ramaphosa and European Commission President Ursula Von der Leyen, he said, adding that the first supplies were expected this month.

“In addition, the Europeans committed to give us 200 million doses before the end of December,” Masiyiwa said at the briefing by the Africa Centres for Disease Control and Prevention.

About 2.93% of people who have been fully immunised against COVID, said Africa CDC director John Nkengasong. The World Health Organization meanwhile warned that eight out of 10 African countries were likely to fall short of the “crucial” goal of vaccinating the most vulnerable 10% of their populations against COVID by the end of the month.

Source: Eyewitness News

Categories : COVIDTags :

WHO Urges Equitable Travel Requirements

On By ModernMedia
Photo by Tim Gouw on Unsplash

The WHO has urged that as air travel is restored, vaccinations should not be a prerequisite for travellers, potentially locking out those in poorer regions, especially Africa.

In a virtual press briefing on Thursday, Dr Matshidiso Moeti, World Health Organization Regional Director for Africa said that the WHO believes that schemes to remove quarantine and entry restrictions for travellers that have been vaccinated, are discriminatory and could deepen already existing inequalities even further.

Meanwhile, she warned that Africa’s third wave, already underway in 12 countries, with cases rising in another 14, threatens to be the worst yet with 5.3 million cases across the continent. It is projected that in three weeks the third wave will surpass the previous wave’s peak.

Public fatigue and new variants are driving this surge across Africa, with Delta the variant  detected in 14 countries. She stated that Africa can “blunt this third wave” but “the window of opportunity is closing”.

The WHO aims to strengthen variant surveillance in Africa by reinforcing the regional laboratory hub have a 8 to 10 fold increase in next 6 months for genome sequencing

Though vaccination rates remain low in Africa, there is nevertheless a great demand for vaccines, with 18 countries having used over 80% of the vaccines received through COVAX. Fortunately only mild side effects from the vaccines have been seen in African communities, she said.

Mr Kamil Alawadi, Regional Vice President for Africa and Middle East, International Air Transport Association (IATA) said that inconsistent requirements added additional complications in travel, increasing cost for the passenger and the airline. For travellers, PCR testing can range from $100 up to $400 for a single, one direction trip.

The key requirement for the recovery of the airline industry is the lifting of restrictions, said Alwadi, citing a survey that showed that 84% of passengers will not fly if there were quarantines in place. However, demand still existed for air travel, as evidenced by travel bookings spiking as soon as governments relaxed their border restrictions.

Alawadi said that the IATA agreed with the WHO that only lifting quarantine requirements for vaccine individuals was inequitable, and that “a robust and flexible testing system” was needed in place of quarantine, using systematic testing at the point of departure such as rapid antigen tests which are cheaper, faster and more accessible.

Graphic from Skyscanner.net showing countries with major travel restrictions from South Africa (red, 83 countries), moderate (orange, 29) and low restrictions (green, 42)

The situation was urgent for the African aviation industry as it had lost USD7.8 billion in 2020, with eight airlines filing for bankruptcy, he noted. This was against a background of USD430 billion global loss for the industry, though he noted that some countries are seeing a rebound to 2019 numbers for domestic travel. However, it is projected that losses will only stop by 2023 and return to profit by 2024.

The IATA has developed protocols in concert with the  International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) and WHO that will be non-discriminatory not require vaccinations, said Alwadi. However the aviation industry is sinking very rapidly without governmental support.

Categories : NeurologyTags :

Call for More Neuroscience Research in Africa

On By ModernMedia
Photo by MART PRODUCTION from Pexels

A team of neuroscientists are calling for greater support of neuroscience research in Africa based on an analysis of the continent’s past two decades of research outputs.  

The findings reveal important information about the nature of funding and international collaboration comparing activity in the continent to other countries, mainly the US, UK and areas of Europe. It is hoped that the study will provide useful data to help further develop science in Africa.  

The greatest human genetic diversity is found in Africa, and Eurasian genomes have less variation than African ones; in fact, Eurasian genomes can be considered a subset of African ones. This carries important implications for understanding human diseases, including neurological disorders.

Co-lead senior author Tom Baden, Professor of Neuroscience in the School of Life Sciences and the Sussex Neuroscience research group at the University of Sussex said: “One beautiful thing about science is that there is no such thing as a truly local problem. But that also means that there should be no such thing as a local solution – research and scientific communication by their very nature must be a global endeavour.  

“And yet, currently the vast majority of research across most disciplines is carried out by a relatively small number of countries, located mostly in the global north. This is a huge waste of human potential.”  

The team, made up of experts from the University of Sussex, the Francis Crick Institute and institutions from across Africa, analysed the entirety of Africa’s outputs in neuroscience over two decades. A lot of early neuroscience research took place in Egypt, it was pointed out.

Lead author Mahmoud Bukar Maina, a Research Fellow in the School of Life Sciences and the Sussex Neuroscience research group at the University of Sussex and visiting scientist at Yobe State University, Nigeria, explained: “Even though early progress in neuroscience began in Egypt, Africa’s research in this area has not kept pace with developments in the field around the world. There are a number of reasons behind this and, for the first time, our work has provided a clear picture of why – covering both strengths and weaknesses of neuroscience research in Africa and comparing this to other continents.  

“We hope it will provide useful data to guide governments, funders and other stakeholders in helping to shape science in Africa, and combat the ‘brain drain’ from the region.”  

Co-lead senior author Lucia Prieto-Godino, a Group Leader at the Francis Crick Institute, said: “One of the reasons why this work is so important, is that the first step to solve any problem is understanding it. Here we analyse key features and the evolution of neuroscience publications across all 54 African countries, and put them in a global context. This highlights strengths and weaknesses, and informs which aspects will be key in the future to support the growth and global integration of neuroscience research in the continent.” 

The study identifies the African countries with the greatest research outputs, revealing that most research funding originates from external sources such as the USA and UK.  

The researchers argue that a sustainable African neuroscience research environment needs local funding, suggesting that greater government backing is needed as well as support from the philanthropic sector.  
Professor Baden added: “One pervasive problem highlighted in our research was the marked absence of domestic funding. In most African countries, international funding far predominates. This is doubly problematic.  

“Firstly, it takes away the crucial funding stability that African researchers would need to meaningfully embark on large-scale and long-term research projects, and secondly, it means that the international, non-African funders essentially end up deciding what research is performed across the continent. Such a system would generate profound outrage across places like Europe – how then can it be acceptable for Africa?”

A number of the researchers involved in the study are members of TReND Africa, a charity supporting scientific capacity building in Africa.  

Source: University of Sussex

Journal information: M. B. Maina et al, Two decades of neuroscience publication trends in Africa, Nature Communications (2021). DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-23784-8 , www.nature.com/articles/s41467-021-23784-8