Tag: 22/9/25

GLP-1 Receptor Agonists Protect the Liver During Alcohol Consumption

Photo by Apolo Photographer on Unsplash

GLP-1 receptor agonists are also promising for the treatment of alcohol use disorder and alcohol-associated liver disease, as growing evidence suggests they reduce the motivation to drink alcohol. Now, surprising new findings reveal that the medications may have direct protective effects on the liver as well.

In a new study, published in npj Metabolism Health and Disease, Yale School of Medicine (YSM) researchers found that in mice, GLP-1RAs reduced an enzyme that metabolises alcohol. That, in turn, decreased the production of toxic alcohol metabolites.

“This is the first time that GLP-1 receptor agonists have been shown to regulate alcohol metabolism in the liver,” says principal investigator Wajahat Mehal, MD, professor of medicine (digestive diseases) at YSM. “If you’re taking semaglutide, then your body will likely handle alcohol differently.”

However, because these drugs slowed the metabolism of alcohol, the mice also had higher blood alcohol levels, the researchers found.

“GLP-1 receptor agonists seem to have very similar effects in mice and humans,” says Mehal. “If these results are also reproduced in humans, people using GLP-1 receptor agonists might be drinking an amount of alcohol that does not normally put them above the legal blood alcohol level, but because they are taking this drug, it does.”

Further studies in humans are needed to understand these impacts of GLP-1 receptor agonists more fully, he stresses.

GLP-1 receptor agonists decrease toxic alcohol metabolites

In the study, researchers gave mice either a GLP-1 receptor agonist or a placebo. They observed that mice receiving the medication had decreased levels of a liver enzyme known as Cyp2e1, which breaks down alcohol into a toxic metabolite called acetaldehyde.

“This is significant because alcohol itself is actually not the most toxic molecule to the liver,” explains Mehal. Rather, acetaldehyde is one of the major drivers of alcohol-related harm to the liver. “These drugs are resulting in less acetaldehyde.”

The findings suggest that not only might GLP-1 receptor agonists help the liver by acting on the brain to reduce alcohol consumption, but also through slowing metabolism of alcohol in the liver, and in turn reducing the levels of toxic metabolites.

Ongoing clinical trials are currently testing the benefits of semaglutide for people living with alcohol-induced liver disease. The study suggests that GLP-1 receptor agonists may offer greater benefits to the liver than previously thought, and that the drug may still help patients who are not abstaining from alcohol.

“Even if some individuals don’t reduce their alcohol intake while they’re on a GLP-1 receptor agonist, they will probably still have hepatic protection, because fewer toxic metabolites will be produced in the liver,” Mehal says.

GLP-1 receptor agonists increase blood alcohol concentration

In another experiment, the researchers measured blood alcohol concentrations of mice 30 minutes after giving them alcohol. They found that mice who had received a GLP-1 receptor agonist had higher blood alcohol concentrations compared to controls, and that these levels took longer to drop.

More research is needed to better understand the consequences of elevated blood alcohol levels on the rest of the body, Mehal says.

“If the liver is not metabolizing alcohol as quickly, the alcohol load could be shifted to other organs,” he poses. “Then, not only might people have a high blood alcohol level, but may also experience more cognitive effects like discoordination.”

The number of people taking these drugs is rapidly increasing—as many as one in eight adults in the U.S. have used or are currently using a GLP-1 receptor agonist. Meanwhile, about half of U.S. adults drink alcohol and 6% report drinking heavily.

As the use of these medications for a range of conditions continues to rise, it is increasingly important to study the interactions between these medications and alcohol, Mehal says.

“There already are large numbers of people who are taking GLP-1 receptor agonists and are drinking either social amounts or excess amounts of alcohol,” says Mehal. “We need to know the effects of these drugs in that setting.

Source: Yale School of Medicine

Landmark Study Finds Perispinal Etanercept of No Benefit to Stroke Trial Participants

A treatment for stroke patients was no more effective than an inactive drug

Source: CC0

The first international trial of an unproven stroke treatment available in the US has concluded that, while harmless, perispinal etanercept is no more effective than an inactive dummy drug, or placebo.

Survivors of stroke have travelled at considerable expense to private clinics in the US to be treated with the arthritis drug etanercept.

In the clinics, the drug is injected into the cervical spinal area, and the patient is then tilted head-down in the belief that this allows the drug to enter the brain.

Stroke is a leading cause of disability throughout the world, affecting more than 7 million people a year. Despite advances, treatments for impairment after stroke remain limited. Some patients call perispinal etanercept a “miracle cure”.

Florey leading stroke researcher, neurologist Professor Vincent Thijs led the Perispinal Etanercept to improve STroke Outcomes – or “PESTO” – trial to investigate this further, supported by funding from the Australian Government.

“We understand why people living with the long-term effects of stroke seek hope and new options,” Professor Thijs said. “With support from the Stroke Foundation and the Medical Research Future Fund, we put this treatment to the test using the gold standard of clinical research – a double-blind randomised trial.”

Half of the PESTO participants were treated with the drug, and half were treated with an inactive dummy drug, with patients and doctors “blind” to who was getting which.

This type of trial eliminates biases because neither doctors nor patients knew who was getting etanercept and who was getting the placebo. Because the results for the 2 patient groups were so similar, we concluded that while the drug did not cause harm, we found no evidence that it led to improved quality of life compared to placebo.

Professor Thijs, who leads the Young Stroke Service at The Florey, said improvements could be due to the placebo effect, a well-established medical phenomenon where some patients in a trial may notice an improvement, despite only receiving a dummy treatment.

Key PESTO trial results, published in Neurology:

  • 126 people from Australia and New Zealand participated in PESTO.
  • 63 received the treatment, 63 the placebo.
  • Their stroke symptoms were measured before the trial and 28 days after.
  • There were no adverse side effects.
  • Among participants who received perispinal etanercept, 52 per cent (33 out of 63) felt better.
  • Among participants who received the placebo, 57 per cent (36 out of 63) felt better.
  • The difference in results between the 2 groups is deemed statistically insignificant.

“It’s important for doctors and the stroke survivor community in Australia and around the world to know that we found no evidence that perispinal etanercept improved quality of life,” Professor Thijs said.

Kelvin Hill, Executive Director of Stroke Programs, Research and Innovation at Stroke Foundation said: “Every Australian stroke patient should have access to the best, evidence-based treatment. Findings of the PESTO study underscore the critical importance of robust research and clinical trials in discovering if treatments work or not.

“Australians experience around 46 000 stroke events every year (one every 11 minutes), and there are now over 440 000 survivors of stroke living in Australia. Stroke Foundation will continue to advocate for more research funding to unlock new effective treatments for stroke; and ensure that advice provided in the Living Clinical Guidelines for Stroke Management enables clinicians to provide the best stroke care possible,” Mr Hill added.

Source: Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health

Study Affirms Efficacy of Nicotinamide for Skin Cancer Prevention 

Overall, there was a 14% reduction in skin cancer risk. When nicotinamide was taken after a first skin cancer, the risk reduction rose to 54%.

3D structure of a melanoma cell derived by ion abrasion scanning electron microscopy. Credit: Sriram Subramaniam/ National Cancer Institute

The dietary supplement nicotinamide has been recommended by dermatologists for people with a history of skin cancer since 2015, when a clinical study with 386 participants showed that those who took the vitamin B3 derivative developed fewer new occurrences. 

But data to validate those findings in a larger study group has been lacking because nicotinamide can be purchased over the counter without being entered into patients’ medical records.

In a new study published in JAMA Dermatology, researchers found a way to get that data by analysing records from the Veterans Affairs Corporate Data Warehouse. Nicotinamide is on the VA’s official formulary, so the researchers checked the outcomes of 33 833 patients for their next skin cancer diagnosis following baseline treatment with 500 milligrams of nicotinamide twice daily for longer than 30 days. They looked for occurrences of basal cell carcinoma and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. 

The researchers compared 12 287 patients who received the treatment with 21 479 who did not. Overall, there was a 14% reduction in skin cancer risk. When nicotinamide was taken after a first skin cancer, the risk reduction rose to 54%, but the benefit declined with treatment initiation following subsequent skin cancers. The risk reduction was much larger for squamous cell carcinoma.  

“There are no guidelines for when to start treatment with nicotinamide for skin cancer prevention in the general population. These results would really shift our practice from starting it once patients have developed numerous skin cancers to starting it earlier. We still need to do a better job of identifying who will actually benefit, as roughly only half of patients will develop multiple skin cancers,” said the study’s corresponding author, Lee Wheless, MD, PhD, assistant professor of Dermatology and Medicine at Vanderbilt University Medical Center and a staff physician at VA Tennessee Valley Healthcare System. 

The researchers were also able to ascertain the outcomes of 1,334 patients who were immunocompromised due to having received solid organ transplants. Among solid organ transplant recipients, no overall significant risk reduction was observed, although early nicotinamide use was associated with reduced occurrences of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. 

Source: Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Magnesium Inhibits Colorectal Cancer Development – Mostly in Females

The findings from the current study suggest that magnesium also increases the gut synthesis of vitamin D, which does not go to the blood and takes effect locally.

Photo by Danilo Alvesd on Unsplash

Researchers from Vanderbilt University Medical Center have demonstrated in a precision-based clinical trial that a magnesium supplement increases gut bacteria in humans that have been shown to synthesise vitamin D and inhibit colorectal cancer carcinogenesis.

However, the effect was observed primarily in females – an outcome that the researchers surmised may be attributable to the role that oestrogen plays in shifting magnesium from circulation into cellular uptake.

Intestinal microbiome data and colonoscopy results were analysed from participants who were randomised by whether they had the TRPM7 genotype, which plays a crucial role in regulating magnesium and calcium uptake.

Previously, the investigators showed in the same randomised trial that magnesium enhances the synthesis of vitamin D and increases the blood levels of vitamin D. The findings from the current study suggest that magnesium also increases the gut synthesis of vitamin D, which does not go to the blood and takes effect locally.

These results from the trial were published in The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition.

“Our previous study showed magnesium supplementation increased blood levels of vitamin D when vitamin D levels were low,” said Qi Dai, MD, PhD, professor of Medicine. “The current study reveals that magnesium supplementation also increases the gut microbes which have been shown to synthesise vitamin D in the gut without sunlight and locally inhibit colorectal cancer development.”

The participants were divided into two arms, one that received the magnesium supplement and another that received a placebo. Their gut microbiome was analysed from stools, rectal swabs and rectal tissues. Among participants with adequate TRPM7 function, the magnesium supplement increased Carnobacterium maltaromaticum and Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, which were previously found to work synergistically to increase vitamin D and decrease colorectal carcinogenesis. Among those with inadequate TRPM7 function, the magnesium supplement reduced the abundance of F. prausnitzii in rectal mucosa.

Among 236 participants who all had a history of colorectal polyps, 124 underwent colonoscopies after completing the trial with a 3.5-year median follow-up time. A higher abundance of F. prausnitzii in rectal mucosa was associated with an almost threefold increase in developing additional polyps.

Source: Vanderbilt University Medical Center