Tag: 6/6/25

Categories : Antibiotics Obstetrics & GynaecologyTags : Leave a comment

Antibiotics Taken During Pregnancy May Reduce Preterm Births

On By ModernMedia
Photo by SHVETS production

A study of almost 1000 pregnant women in Zimbabwe found that a daily dose of a commonly used, safe and inexpensive antibiotic may have led to fewer babies being born early. Among women living with HIV, those who received the antibiotic had larger babies who were less likely to be preterm.

One in four live-born infants worldwide is preterm (born at 37 weeks’ gestation or before), is small for gestational age, or has a low birth weight. The mortality rate for these small and vulnerable newborns is high, with prematurity now the leading cause of death among children younger than 5 years of age. Maternal infections and inflammation during pregnancy are linked to adverse birth outcomes, particularly for babies born to mothers living with HIV, who have a greater risk of being born too small or too soon. 

An international group of researchers, led by Professor Andrew Prendergast from Queen Mary University of London, and Bernard Chasekwa from the Zvitambo Institute for Maternal and Child Health Research in Zimbabwe, conducted the Cotrimoxazole for Mothers to Improve Birthweight in Infants (COMBI) randomised controlled trial, to examine whether prescribing pregnant women a daily dose of trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole (a broad-spectrum antimicrobial agent with anti-inflammatory properties, widely used in sub-Saharan Africa) would result in heavier birth weights, decreased premature births, and better health outcomes for their babies.  

993 pregnant women were recruited from three antenatal clinics in Shurugwi, a district in central Zimbabwe, and received either 960 mg of the drug or a placebo daily. The participants received regular antenatal care during their pregnancies and data regarding their birth outcomes were recorded. 

The study, published in the New England Journal of Medicine, found that although birthweight did not differ significantly between the two groups, the trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole group showed a 40% reduction in the proportion of preterm births, compared to the placebo group. Overall, 6.9% of mothers receiving the drug had babies born preterm, compared to 11.5% of mothers receiving the placebo, and no women receiving antibiotics had babies born prior to 28 weeks. For babies born to a small group of 131 women with HIV, the reduction in premature births was especially marked, with only 2% of births in the trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole group preterm, as compared with 14% in the placebo group. Babies exposed to antibiotics during pregnancy also showed a 177 gram increase in their birth weight. 

Bernard Chasekwa, first author, said: “Our trial, conducted within routine antenatal care and enrolling women predominantly from rural areas, showed that trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole did not improve birthweight, which was our main outcome. However, there was an intriguing suggestion that it may have improved the length of pregnancy and reduced the proportion of preterm births. We now need to repeat this trial in different settings around the world to see whether antibiotics during pregnancy can help reduce the risk of prematurity.”  

Source: Queen Mary University of London

Categories : Cardiovascular Disease Mental HealthTags : Leave a comment

Extensive Study Refutes the Notion that Statins have Antidepressant Effect

On By ModernMedia
Photo by Towfiqu Barbhuiya on Unsplash

Lipid-lowering medicines, known as statins, are prescribed in cases of high cholesterol levels, to reduce the risk of atherosclerosis, heart attack and stroke. The results of some small studies suggest that statins could also have an antidepressive effect. Researchers from Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin have now conducted an extensive study to investigate this claim. However, they could not verify that statins cause any additional antidepressive effects. As a result, the researchers suggest following the general guidelines and prescribing statins to help lower cholesterol, but not to manage depression. The study has now been published in JAMA Psychiatry.

Cholesterol-lowering drugs are the most commonly prescribed medicines globally. They have anti-inflammatory effects and lower the production of cholesterol in the liver, which in turn reduces the risk of developing cardiovascular diseases. In the past, numerous small studies have suggested that statins may also have antidepressive effects, alongside these more common properties. “If statins really did have this antidepressive effect, we could kill two birds with one stone,” says study leader Prof Christian Otte, Director of the Department of Psychiatry and Neurosciences on the Charité Campus Benjamin Franklin. “Depression and adiposity, or obesity, are among the most common medical conditions globally. And they actually often appear together: Those who are obese are at a higher risk of depression. In turn, those with depression are at a higher risk of obesity.” Obese patients often have higher cholesterol levels, so statins are administered to reduce the risk of cardiovascular diseases. But could they also alleviate depression?

An extensive, controlled study

Led by Christian Otte, the research team conducted a comprehensive study to investigate the potential antidepressive effects of statins that have been suggested. A total of 161 patients took part in the study, all of whom suffered from both depression and obesity. During the 12-week study, all participants were treated with a standard antidepressant (Escitalopram). Half of the participants also received a cholesterol-lowering drug (Simvastatin), while the other half were given a placebo. It was decided at random who would receive statins and who would be given the placebo – the recipients of each were unknown to both the medical team and the participants. This ensured a randomized and double-blind study that would produce reliable results. “This method should show us whether we can observe a stronger antidepressive effect among participants treated with statins, compared to those in the placebo group,” explains co-lead author Dr. Woo Ri Chae, Charité BIH Clinician Scientist at the Department of Psychiatry and Neurosciences.

The researchers used established clinical interviews and self-completed questionnaires to record the severity of depression in the patients at the beginning and end of the study. Blood samples were taken from the participants to determine their blood lipid levels and level of the C-reactive protein (CRP), which are known indicators of inflammatory processes in the body. “People with obesity and/or depression commonly exhibit slightly raised inflammatory markers in the blood. For some of those affected, this can actually be the cause of depression,” explains Christian Otte. “And this is precisely where we began with our hypothesis on the potential antidepressive effect of statins: If administering statins leads to an improvement in inflammatory markers, could this also possibly be accompanied by an antidepressive effect for some of the study participants?”

Traditional antidepressants remain the gold standard

At the beginning of the study, the participants ranged from moderately to severely depressed. Over the course of the 12-week study, the depression symptoms in all patients showed clear improvement – there was, however, no difference between those who received statins and those in the placebo group. “Administering the cholesterol-lowering drug improved blood lipid levels, as expected, and the inflammatory marker CRP also displayed a marked reduction,” says Woo Ri Chae. “So, unfortunately, this does not point to an additional antidepressive effect.” Christian Otte adds: “When it comes to treating depression, statins therefore have no additional benefit. To our present knowledge, traditional antidepressants remain the gold standard.” According to current guidelines, statins should be prescribed to reduce the risk of atherosclerosis and cardiovascular diseases. The researchers recommend that the same should naturally also apply for patients suffering from depression.

In further studies, Christian Otte’s team will conduct a more thorough analysis of the blood samples taken as part of this research on a cellular and molecular level, to reveal potential differences and correlations. The researchers are also continuing to work at full speed on improved strategies for treating patients with depression who also suffer from other conditions.

Categories : NeurologyTags : Leave a comment

Scientists Uncover the Brain Mechanisms that Distinguish Imagination from Reality

On By ModernMedia
Photo by Fakurian Design on Unsplash

Areas of the brain that help a person differentiate between what is real and what is imaginary have been uncovered in a new study led by UCL researchers. The research, published in Neuron, found that a region in the brain known as the fusiform gyrus – located behind one’s temples, on the underside of the brain’s temporal lobe – is involved in helping the brain to determine whether what we see is from the external world or generated by our imagination.

The researchers hope that their findings will increase understanding of the cognitive processes that go awry when someone has difficulty judging what is real and what is not, such as in schizophrenia, and could eventually lead to advancement in diagnosing and treating these conditions.

Lead author, Dr Nadine Dijkstra (Department of Imaging Neuroscience at UCL) said: “Imagine an apple in your mind’s eye as vividly as you can. During imagination, many of the same brain regions activate in the same manner as when you see a real apple. Until recently, it remained unclear how the brain distinguishes between these real and imagined experiences.”

For the study, researchers asked 26 participants to look at simple visual patterns while imagining them at the same time.

Specifically, participants were asked to look for a specific faint pattern within a noisy background on a screen and indicate whether the pattern was actually present or not. A real pattern was only presented half of the time.

At the same time, participants were also instructed to imagine a pattern that was either the same or different to the one they were looking for, and indicate how vivid their mental images were.

When the patterns were the same, and participants reported that their imagination was very vivid, they were more likely to say they saw a real pattern, even on trials in which nothing was presented. This means they mistook their mental images for reality.

While participants performed the tasks, their brain activity was monitored using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). This technology enabled the researchers to identify which parts of the brain showed patterns of activity that helped distinguish reality from imagination.

The team found that the strength of activity in the fusiform gyrus could predict whether people judged an experience as real or imagined, irrespective of whether it actually was real.

When activity in the fusiform gyrus was strong, people were more likely to indicate that the pattern was really there.

Usually, activation in the fusiform gyrus is weaker during imagination than during perception, which helps the brain keep the two apart. However, this study showed that sometimes when participants imagined very vividly, activation of the fusiform gyrus was very strong and participants confused their imagination for reality.

Senior author, Professor Steve Fleming (UCL Psychology & Language Sciences) said: “The brain activity in this area of visual cortex matched the predictions from a computer simulation on how the difference between internally and externally generated experience is determined.”

Dr Dijkstra added: “Our findings suggest that the brain uses the strength of sensory signals to distinguish between imagination and reality.”

The study also showed that the fusiform gyrus collaborates with other brain areas to help us decide what is real and what is imagined.

Specifically, activity in the anterior insula – a brain region in the prefrontal cortex (the front part of the brain that acts as a control centre for tasks such as decision making, problem solving and planning) – increased in line with activity in the fusiform gyrus when participants said something was real, even if it was in fact imagined.

Professor Fleming said: “These areas of the prefrontal cortex have previously been implicated in metacognition – the ability to think about our own minds. Our results indicate that the same brain areas are also involved in deciding what is real.”

These results offer new insights into what might go wrong in the brain during psychiatric conditions like schizophrenia where patients struggle keeping apart imagination and reality. The findings may also inform future virtual reality technologies by identifying how and when imagined experiences feel real.

Source: University College London

Categories : Emergency MedicineTags : Leave a comment

Statins may Reduce Mortality Risk by 39% for Patients with Septic Shock

On By ModernMedia
Image from Rawpixel

Each year in the US alone, approximately 750 000 patients are hospitalised for sepsis, of which approximately 27% die. In about 15% of cases, sepsis worsens into septic shock, characterised by dangerously low blood pressure and reduced blood flow to tissues. The risk of death from septic shock is even higher, between 30% and 40%.

The earlier patients with sepsis are treated, the better their prospects. Typically, they receive antibiotics, intravenous fluids, and vasopressors to raise blood pressure. But now, a large cohort study in Frontiers in Immunology has shown for the first time that supplementary treatment with statins could boost their chances of survival.

“Our large, matched cohort study found that treatment with statins was associated with a 39% lower death rate for critically ill patients with sepsis, when measured over 28 days after hospital admission,” said Dr Caifeng Li, the study’s corresponding author and an associate professor at Tianjin Medical University General Hospital in China.

Statins are best known as a protective treatment against cardiovascular disease, which function by lowering ‘bad’ LDL cholesterol and triglycerides, and raising ‘good’ HDL cholesterol. But they have been shown to bring a plethora of further benefits, which explains the burgeoning interest in their use as a supplementary therapy for inflammatory disorders, including sepsis.

Not just lowering cholesterol

“Statins have anti-inflammatory, immunomodulatory, antioxidative, and antithrombotic properties. They may help mitigate excessive inflammatory response, restore endothelial function, and show potential antimicrobial activities,” said Li.

The authors sourced their data from the public Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-IV (MIMIC-IV) database, which holds the anonymised e-health records of 265 000 patients admitted to the emergency department and the intensive care unit of the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center of Boston between 2008 and 2019. Only adults with a diagnosis of sepsis hospitalised for longer than 24 hours were included here.

The authors compared outcomes between patients who received or didn’t receive any statins during their stay besides standard of care, regardless of the type of statin. Unlike in randomised clinical trials, the allocation of treatments is not determined by random in observational studies like the present cohort study. This means that it is in principle hard to rule out that an unknown underlying variable affected allocation, for example if physicians unconsciously or on purpose were prone to give statins to those patients most likely to benefit from them.

However, Li and colleagues used a technique called ‘propensity score matching’ to minimize the risk of such bias: they built a statistical model to determine a likelihood score that a given patient would receive statins, based on their medical records, and then found a matching patient with a similar score, but who didn’t receive statins. In the final sample, 6070 critical patients received statins while another 6070 did not.

Source: Frontiers

Categories : GeneticsTags : Leave a comment

Massive US Study Finds that ‘Race’ is a Poor Proxy for Genetic Ancestry

On By ModernMedia
Photo by ROCKETMANN TEAM

Genetic ancestry is much more complicated than how people report their race and ethnicity. New research, using data from the National Institutes of Health’s (NIH) All of Us Research Program, finds that people who identify as being from the same race or ethnic group can have a wide range of genetic differences. The findings are reported June 5 in the American Journal of Human Genetics.

As doctors and researchers learn more about how genetic variants influence the incidence and course of human diseases, the study of genetic ancestry has become increasingly important. This research is driving the field of precision medicine, which aims to develop individualized healthcare.

People whose ancestors came from the same part of the world are likely to have inherited the same genetic variants, but self-identified race and ethnicity don’t tell the whole story about a person’s ancestors. NIH’s All of Us Research Program was created in part to address this puzzle and to learn more about how genetic ancestry influences human health.

In the current study, the investigators looked at the DNA of more than 230 000 people who have volunteered to share their health information for All of Us. They compared it to other large DNA projects from around the world using a technique called principal component analysis (PCA) to visualise population structure and help identify genetic similarity between individuals and groups of people. This analysis showed that people in the US have very mixed ancestry, and their DNA doesn’t always match the race or ethnicity they write on forms. Instead of falling into clear groups based on race or ethnicity, people’s genetic backgrounds show gradients of variation across different US regions and states.

This is especially significant for people who identify as being of Hispanic or Latino origin. These people have a wide-ranging blend of ancestries from European, Native American, and African groups. Importantly, genetic ancestry among these people varies across the US in part because of historic migration patterns. For example, Hispanics/Latinos in the Northeast are more likely to have Caribbean (and thus African) ancestry, and those in the Southwest are more likely to have Mexican and Central American (and thus Native American) ancestry.

One specific discovery was that ancestry was significantly associated with body mass index (BMI) and height, even after adjusting for socio-economic differences. For example, West and Central African ancestries were associated with higher BMI, whereas East Africa ancestry was associated with lower BMI. There were similar findings showing that people with ancestral origins from different parts of Europe have different body measurements including height, with northern European ancestry associated with greater height and southern European ancestry associated with shorter height. This suggests that subcontinental differences in ancestry can have opposite effects on biological traits and diseases.

This finding suggests that the subcontinental differences in ancestry between individuals can have opposite effects on biological traits, diseases, and health outcomes, emphasising the importance of not classifying individuals into broad ancestry groups such as African, European, or Asian. Doing this will help to make this research more accurate and will help to improve the field of precision medicine.

Source: Cell Press via EurekAlert!