Tag: 10/11/25

Disagreement Between Two Kidney Function Tests Predicts Disease Risk

Photo by National Cancer Institute on Unsplash

A mismatch between two common tests for kidney function may indicate a higher risk for kidney failure, heart disease, and death, a new study shows.

Healthcare providers for decades have measured blood levels of creatinine to track the rate at which kidneys filter waste from muscle breakdown in the bloodstream. According to more recent guidelines, levels of cystatin C, a small protein made by all cells in the body, can also be used to measure kidney function. Since these two tests are influenced by different factors – including some related to disease or aging – using both markers together can provide a better measure of kidney function and risk of organ failure than either one alone.

Led by NYU Langone Health researchers, the new work reveals that many people, especially those who are sick, often have a large gap between the two readings, which may be a signal of future disease. Specifically, the global study shows that more than a third of hospitalised participants had a cystatin C-based readout of kidney function that was at least 30% lower than one based on their creatinine levels.

“Our findings highlight the importance of measuring both creatinine and cystatin C to gain a true understanding of how well the kidneys are working, particularly among older and sicker adults,” said study co-corresponding author Morgan Grams, MD, PhD. “Evaluating both biomarkers may identify far more people with poor kidney function, and earlier in the disease process, by covering the blind spots that go with either test.”

The study published online November 7 in the Journal of the American Medical Association and is simultaneously being presented at the American Society of Nephrology’s annual Kidney Week conference.

Beyond detecting signs of disease, assessing patients’ kidney function is important for calculating the appropriate dosage for cancer medicines, antibiotics, and many other drugs, says Dr Grams, Professor of Medicine at the NYU Grossman School of Medicine.

During another investigation, the results of which were published the same day, the same research team found that a record number of people worldwide have chronic kidney disease, which is now the ninth leading cause of death globally. Having new ways to spot the condition early can help ensure that patients receive swift treatment and avoid more-dramatic interventions such as dialysis and organ transplantation, says Dr Grams.

For the recent investigation, the research team analysed healthcare records, blood tests, and demographic data collected from 860, 66 men and women of a half-dozen nationalities. All participants had their creatinine and cystatin C levels measured on the same day and received follow-ups 11 years later, on average. The team considered factors unrelated to kidney function that influence the biomarkers’ readings, such as smoking, obesity, and history of cancer.

Performed as part of the international Chronic Kidney Disease Prognosis Consortium, the study is the largest to date to explore differences between the two tests and whether they may signal potential health problems, the authors say. Established to better understand and treat the condition, the consortium provides evidence for global definitions of chronic kidney disease and related health risks.

According to the new findings, those whose cystatin C-based measures of kidney filtration were at least 30% lower than their creatinine-based measures were at higher risk for death, heart disease, and heart failure than those who had a smaller difference between the two metrics. The former group was also more likely to be diagnosed with severe chronic kidney disease that required dialysis or an organ transplant. The same was found for 11% of outpatients and seemingly healthy volunteers.

Dr. Grams notes that while cystatin C testing was first recommended in 2012 by the international organization Kidney Disease—Improving Global Outcomes, a 2019 survey revealed that less than 10 percent of clinical laboratories in the United States performed it in-house. The two largest laboratories, Quest Diagnostics and Labcorp, now offer the test.

“These results underscore the need for physicians to take advantage of the fact that more hospitals and healthcare providers are starting to offer cystatin C testing,” said study co-corresponding author Josef Coresh, MD, PhD, director of NYU Langone’s Optimal Aging Institute. “Physicians might otherwise miss out on valuable information about their patients’ wellbeing and future medical concerns.”

Dr Coresh cautions that among the hospitalised Americans in the study, less than 1% were tested for cystatin C.

Source: NYU Langone Health

Dark Clinics, Real Risks: The Hidden Dangers of Illegal Hair Transplants in South Africa

Infections, scarring, and even death are lurking behind slick ads

Photo by Towfiqu barbhuiya

In a tiny back room, with outdated instruments and no doctor in sight, a “hair transplant” begins. Weeks later, patients arrive at legitimate clinics with infections that won’t heal, patchy or missing hair, and permanent scarring – some even with necrotic tissue. This isn’t just happening abroad in countries like Turkey and Pakistan; South Africa has its own growing underground hair transplant industry: the so-called “dark clinics”.

These clinics operate everywhere. In mobile setups, or purely online. Many are run by unlicensed practitioners who are far from registered doctors. Many staff aren’t even legally allowed to work in the country. Regulation is patchy. Enforcement is almost impossible given that they operate for a few weeks and then disappear. And the people who pay the price? Everyday men and women desperate to fix hair loss but who are unable to afford quality and safety.

“Most people have no idea what they’re walking into when visiting one of these clinics,” says Dr Kashmal Kalan, Medical Director at Alvi Armani South Africa. “We see patients quite often who come to us after unsatisfactory or botched procedures. And yes, some cases are life-threatening. These clinics operate with no oversight, no hygiene protocols, and zero accountability.”

The harm isn’t just cosmetic. Rogue clinics routinely cut corners. Non-medical staff perform invasive procedures. Sterile instruments? Often non-existent. Infection control? Minimal. Follow-up care? None. Patients are sometimes rushed into procedures without proper consent, unaware of realistic outcomes or potential complications. What starts as a “cheap deal” can quickly spiral into months of medical interventions, emotional trauma, revision surgeries, and financial strain.

Dr Kalan explains the lure: “These clinics play on insecurity, urgency, and the desire for fast results. Social media and online payments make it easy for unqualified operators to reach people. Most patients don’t ask the hard questions. They only learn the truth when it’s too late. One patient described it as the worst mistake of his life – a promise of transformation that turned into months of pain, scarring, and regret.”

Hard truths: Red flags to watch out for

A legitimate clinic is open, accountable, and transparent. Dark clinics thrive on secrecy, pressure tactics, and the promise of cheap shortcuts. Patients must ask:

  1. Is the surgeon fully qualified, licensed, and registered in South Africa?
    • Do they have a valid Health Professions Council of South Africa (HPCSA) license? Are they legally allowed to practice in South Africa?
  2. Which technique will be used and why?
    • Follicular Unit Extraction (FUE), Follicular Unit Transplantation (FUT), Direct Hair Implantation (DHI) – what’s suitable for your hair type and hair-loss pattern?
  3. How many grafts will I need, and what can I realistically expect?
    • Outcomes depend on donor area, hair quality, and pattern of hair loss.
  4. What are the risks, and how are they managed?
    • Infection control, emergency protocols, and complication plans must be clear.
  5. What aftercare is in place?
    • Who monitors healing? How frequent are follow-ups? Can you contact someone if there’s a problem?
  6. Can I see genuine before-and-after photos?
    • Photos must be comparable, real, and relevant to your hair type.
  7. Is the clinic accredited and registered with the relevant health authority?
    • The facility must be sterile, clean, and transparent.

Regulators such as the HPCSA and The South African Health Products Regulatory Authority (SAHPRA) try to police illegal clinics, but dark clinics operate under the radar – changing locations, staff, and online presence frequently, creating a perfect storm of vulnerability.

The only safe route: choose a qualified, certified, and accountable practitioner. Look for transparency, credentials, consultations, and thorough aftercare. Ask questions.

Dr Kalan warns: “Do your homework. Don’t chase the cheapest option. Cheap shortcuts in cosmetic procedures are rarely worth it. Your hair can be restored safely, but the damage from a dark clinic? That can scar you for life.”