Tag: pregnancy

Categories : Obstetrics & GynaecologyTags :

Low Vitamin D in Pregnancy Can Raise Autism Risk

On By ModernMedia
Source: Anna Hecker on Unsplash

Low maternal vitamin D intake during pregnancy can affect the development of autism in the child along with various other factors, according to a new study from the University of Turku, Finland, and Columbia University, USA.

The study, published in the Biological Psychiatry journal, included 1558 cases of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and an equal number of matched controls born in Finland between January 1987 and December 2004, followed up until December 2015. 

Maternal vitamin D deficiency during pregnancy was linked to a 44% increased risk of ASD in the offspring, compared to women with sufficient vitamin D. 

The result persisted even when accounting for maternal age, immigration, smoking, psychopathology, substance abuse, the gestational week of blood draw, season of blood collection, and gestational age.

“The results are significant for public health as vitamin D deficiency is readily preventable,” said first author, Professor Andre Sourander from the University of Turku.

In previous work, the researchers had shown that vitamin D deficiency is also associated with increasede ADHD risk in the offspring. The serum samples were collected before the national recommendation for vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy was introduced in Finland. The current recommendation for pregnant women is a daily supplement of 10 micrograms of vitamin D throughout the year.

“Vitamin D deficiency is a major global problem,” Prof Sourander remarked.

Source: University of Turku

Categories : Obstetrics & GynaecologyTags :

Consensus Statement Cautions on Paracetamol Use in Pregnancy

On By ModernMedia
Source: Anna Hecker on Unsplash

A consensus statement by 13 doctors in different countries suggests that pregnant people only take paracetamol/acetaminophen if it is medically necessary, Their paper, published in the journal Nature Reviews Endocrinology, the group paracetamol/acetaminophen (APAP). 

In the same journal issue, an accompanying Editorial outlines the consensus statement and noting that its authors are not calling for a ban on the drug being used, instead they are suggesting that it be taken more cautiously by pregnant women because of a possible risk of birth defects.

Research in recent years has shown that it is possible under some circumstances for APAP to alter foetal development which can herald problems with neurological, urological and reproductive disorders in the baby – the authors found evidence of birth defects in 26 out of 29 studies. The authors call for more research into the possible problems with the drug’s use by pregnant women. They also acknowledge – as do several experts in a reaction piece published on the Science Media Centre site – that APAP is the only pain management drug available for pregnant women. And they point out that medical use of APAP is generally warranted when the mother experiences problems that can negatively impact her baby –  such as having a fever. But they also note that pregnant women’s APAP use appears to have crept up into general use as it has gained a reputation as being safe to use as an all-purpose painkiller.

The expert group and the authors of the new paper notably both point out that the recommendation does not differ from that already in use by most OB/GYNs – and similar wording generally appears on bottles of products based on APAP, such as Tylenol.

The consensus statement’s authors say their intention behind the article is to bring renewed and more focused attention to the possibility of APAP use leading to certain birth defects and the conditions under which they might arise. They note that current research has shown, for example, that the risk of harm seems to rise as the duration of APAP use goes up. In light of this, they suggest pregnant women consider using the drug for short term pain management, rather than as a long-term solution.

Source: Medical Xpress

Categories : Antibiotics Obstetrics & GynaecologyTags :

Azithromycin Protects Pregnancies in Countries with Malaria

On By ModernMedia
Photo by Hush Naidoo on Unsplash

A review has found that the common antibiotic azithromycin taken during pregnancy reduces low birth weight and premature births in countries where malaria is endemic.

The systematic review of 14 studies in African and Asia, published in The Lancet EClinicalMedicine, found that azithromycin, reduced low birth weight and prematurity but didn’t lower infant deaths, infections and hospital admissions.

Azithromycin, an inexpensive antibiotic widely used to treat chest and ear infections, has been specifically used in the past in pregnancy to treat STIs and, alongside other antimalarial drugs, to prevent adverse consequences of malaria on maternal and foetal outcomes and caesarean wound infections.

Murdoch Children’s Research Institute (MCRI) researcher Dr Maeve Hume-Nixon said it was not clear whether azithromycin would improve perinatal and neonatal outcomes in non-malaria endemic settings, and the potential harm on stillbirth rates needed further investigation.

Dr Hume-Nixon said these findings emphasised the importance of similar MCRI-led research currently being done in Fiji.

“This review found that there was uncertainty about the potential benefits of this intervention on neonatal deaths, admissions and infections, and potential harmful effects on stillbirth despite biological reasons why this intervention may have benefits for these outcomes,” she said.

“Therefore, results from studies like ours underway in Fiji will help to better understand the effect of this intervention on these outcomes.”

The Bulabula MaPei study is a randomised controlled clinical trial testing if azithromycin given to women in labour, prevents maternal and infant infections.

Globally, infections account for 21% of 2.4 million neonatal deaths per year and 52% of all under-five deaths, disproportionately occurring in low- and middle-income countries.

About five million cases of pregnancy-related infections occur in mothers each year as well, resulting in 75 000 maternal deaths.

MCRI Professor Fiona Russell said the large clinical trials in Africa and Asia, along with the MCRI-led trial in Fiji, were likely to inform global policy related to maternal child health and hopefully benefit infants and mothers around the world.

“Administration of azithromycin during labour may be a cheap and simple intervention that could be used to improve neonatal death rates in low and middle-income countries, alongside strengthening of maternal child health services,” she said. “This study, together with other large clinical trials, will add to evidence for the consideration of new international maternal and child health guidelines.”

Source: Murdoch Childrens Research Institute

Categories : Obstetrics & GynaecologyTags :

Taking Action Before and Between Pregnancies Reduces Risk of Preeclampsia

On By ModernMedia
Credit: Thirdman on Pexels

In a new study, John Hopkins researchers have found that the periods before pregnancy and in between pregnancies are crucial times to address preeclampsia risk factors like obesity, diabetes and hypertension.

Preeclampsia, a common pregnancy complication, is characterised by high blood pressure and signs of damage to the liver, kidneys or other organs. It usually starts after 20 weeks of pregnancy in women whose blood pressure had previously been normal. .

The team, led by S. Michelle Ogunwole, MD, a fellow in the Division of General Internal Medicine, and Wendy Bennett, MD, MPH, associate professor of medicine, both at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, published their findings in the Journal of the American Heart Association.

Dr Ogunwole said: “Preconception health care is really important as it’s a window of opportunity to think about your future health. We encourage patients to work on chronic disease issues before their pregnancies and between their pregnancies.”

A woman who develops preeclampsia during her first pregnancy has a higher risk of the condition recurring in a second or any successive pregnancies, she said.

“As an internist concerned about maternal outcomes, I am interested in what health care providers can do to help women reduce their risk of preeclampsia, including being a big proponent of preconception counseling,” said Dr Ogunwole.

The team compared two sets of women who were participating in the Boston Birth Cohort. Since 1998, the cohort has looked at a broad array of early life factors and their effects on pregnancy, infancy and child health outcomes. The researchers wanted to understand the differences between women who developed preeclampsia and those who did not, and how a first case of the condition affects subsequent pregnancies. Dr Ogunwole’s team studied 618 women to gain “rich maternal health data among racially and ethnically diverse pregnant women.”

“We wanted to make sure that we’re asking questions in a population that looks like the populations we serve,” she says. “I’m interested in the life course of women and pregnancy complications that can shape the trajectory of their future health.”

The researchers found that obesity, diabetes, high blood pressure, gestational diabetes and preterm birth were common factors in women who had preeclampsia during both first and second pregnancies, or who developed the condition during gestation with a second or later child.

“We know that improving weight will improve other conditions, so we advise that women create healthier lifestyles before and between pregnancies,” said Dr Ogunwole. “Whether you have another pregnancy again or not, you can still improve your overall health.”

Future research should hopefully include larger trials to confirm their results. Dr  Ogunwole  also plans to study the structural barriers that may prevent women from engaging in healthy lifestyles and develop strategies to improve long-term health outcomes for women.

Source: John Hopkins Medicine

Categories : Obstetrics & GynaecologyTags :

Team Investigates The Hazards of Vaping During Pregnancy

On By ModernMedia

Motivated by widely assumed and unproven presumptions that vaping is safer than cigarette smoking, a team at West Virginia University (WVU) is conducting a three-year study on the effects of vaping during pregnancy.

Smoking during pregnancy continues to be a public health problem. It is estimated that around half of women who smoke before becoming pregnant will continue to smoke during and after the pregnancy. Smoking during pregnancy can lead to preterm birth, birth defects and an increased risk of sudden infant death syndrome. Because of this, an increasing number of women who choose to smoke while pregnant are being encouraged to switch to vaping.

“We know that when someone vapes, their blood vessels react by temporarily constricting – or getting smaller, which affects children while in the womb because their fetal environment is also altered,” said contact principal investigator Mark Olfert, associate professor at WVU.

Altering the blood supply in the foetal environment can create a hostile environment for the foetus, leading to serious issues during child and adult life. A previous study in 2018 showed that vaping induced a similar dysfunctional response in the blood vessels of both male and female animals as did smoking cigarettes. So there is great concern that women who are switching to vaping during pregnancy because they think it is safer than smoking are wrong, and that vaping will result in the same problems and complications for offspring as smoking.

Investigations are underway into the reasons behind the harm, and, importantly, what effect these have on the long-term vascular health beyond childhood in offspring that experienced foetal exposure to maternal vaping.

Source: News-Medical.Net

Categories : Obstetrics & GynaecologyTags :

New Study Finds Marijuana THC Persists in Breast Milk

On By ModernMedia


A new study has found that tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) from marijuana can linger in breast milk for up to six weeks after ceasing marijuana use.

Marijuana is the most commonly used dependent substance in pregnancy, with up to half of users continuing through pregnancy. The use of marijuana through pregnancy is likely due to its perceived safety as well as   THC readily crosses the placental barrier, and cannabinoid receptors have been identified in both the placenta and the foetus. However, most studies done on marijuana and pregnancy dates from the 1980s –  this study is the first of its kind to examine the levels of THC in breast milk since one in 1982.

“With the increasing utilisation of marijuana in society as a whole, we are seeing more mothers who use marijuana during pregnancy,” said primary investigator Erica Wymore, MD, MPH, Neonatologist, Children’s Colorado and Assistant Professor of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine. “However, given the lack of scientific data regarding how long THC persists in breast milk, it was challenging to provide mothers with a definitive answer regarding the safety of using marijuana while breastfeeding and simply ‘pumping and dumping’ until THC was no longer detectable in their milk. With this study, we aimed to better understand this question by determining the amount and duration of THC excretion in breast milk among women with known prenatal marijuana use.”

The researchers screened women at the Children’s Colorado and UC Health’s University of Colorado Hospital for reported marijuana use or detected THC, who were willing to abstain from marijuana for the six week duration of the study. Of the 394 women screened, 25 enrolled in the study. Seven of these women were able to abstain from their marijuana use, while the others were not able to due depending on it for stress, sleep, and pain relief.

“This study provided invaluable insight into the length of time it takes a woman to metabolise the THC in her body after birth, but it also helped us understand why mothers use marijuana in the first place,” said Maya Bunik, MD, MPH, senior investigator, medical director of the Child Health Clinic and the Breastfeeding Management Clinic at Children’s Colorado and professor of pediatrics at the CU School of Medicine. “To limit the unknown THC effects on foetal brain development and promote safe breastfeeding, it is critical to emphasise marijuana abstention both early in pregnancy and postpartum. To help encourage successful abstention, we need to look at – and improve – the system of supports we offer new moms.”

While the study was not about the impact of maternal marijuana use on childhood development, longitudinal studies dating from the 1980s show that for children born to mothers who smoked marijuana during pregnancy, there are long-term issues with cognitive and executive functioning, including impulsivity, as well as deficits in learning, sustained attention and visual problem-solving skills. One recent retrospective study has also linked marijuana use in pregnancy to autism in children. Dr Wymore points out that this is cause for concern as currently available marijuana has a potency five to six times greater than what was available prior to legalisation.

Source: News-Medical.Net

Journal information: Wymore, E.M., et al. (2021) Persistence of Δ-9-Tetrahydrocannabinol in Human Breast Milk. JAMA Pediatrics. doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.6098.

Categories : PaediatricsTags :

Caffeine Shown to Alter Brain Pathways in Utero

On By ModernMedia

Caffeine consumption during pregnancy could change key brain pathways, resulting in children having significant behavioural problems in later life. 

“These are sort of small effects and it’s not causing horrendous psychiatric conditions, but it is causing minimal but noticeable behavioural issues that should make us consider long term effects of caffeine intake during pregnancy,” said John Foxe, PhD, director of the Del Monte Institute for Neuroscience. “I suppose the outcome of this study will be a recommendation that any caffeine during pregnancy is probably not such a good idea.” Foxe also pointed out that this was a retrospective study, reliant on mothers’ recall of caffeine consumption.

Studies had already linked caffeine to other outcomes, such as a meta-review which found a nearly linear link between caffeine consumption and low birth weight. It is known that foetuses do not possess the enzyme necessary to break down caffeine, which crosses the placenta into the foetal bloodstream.

Researchers at the Del Monte Institute for Neuroscience at the University of Rochester Medical Center (URMC) analysed brain scans of thousands of children. The researchers observed increased behavioural and attention problems along with hyperactivity in these children. They observed distinct changes in how the white matter tracks (which connect brain regions) were organised in children of mothers who reported caffeine consumption during pregnancy.

“What makes this unique is that we have a biological pathway that looks different when you consume caffeine through pregnancy,” said first author Zachary Christensen, an MD/PhD candidate in the Medical Science Training Program. “Previous studies have shown that children perform differently on IQ tests, or they have different psychopathology, but that could also be related to demographics, so it’s hard to parse that out until you have something like a biomarker. This gives us a place to start future research to try to learn exactly when the change is occurring in the brain.”

At this stage it is not known what the relationship between amounts of caffeine are, or what effects arise in each trimester.

“Current clinical guidelines already suggest limiting caffeine intake during pregnancy—no more than two normal cups of coffee a day,” added Christensen. “In the long term, we hope to develop better guidance for mothers, but in the meantime, they should ask their doctor as concerns arise.”

Source: Medical Xpress

Journal information: Zachary P. Christensen et al, Caffeine exposure in utero is associated with structural brain alterations and deleterious neurocognitive outcomes in 9–10 year old children, Neuropharmacology (2021). DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2021.108479

Categories : Obstetrics & GynaecologyTags :

Onset of Morning Sickness Narrowed Down

On By ModernMedia

The onset of “morning sickness”, the nausea and vomiting that often occurs near the beginning of pregnancy and normally resolves at 12-14 weeks, has been narrowed down in a new study from researchers at the University of Warwick.

The cause of nausea and vomiting of pregnancy (NVP) had historically been ascribed to psychological conditions, but currently is believed to have a multifactorial basis, involving various genetic, endocrine and gastrointestinal factors.

The study involved 256 women who became pregnant, keeping a diary recording the onset of nausea and vomiting, their last menstruation and date of ovulation as measured by a urine test.Determining the date of the start of pregnancy as determined by the date of their last ovulation, the first onset of NVP was 8 to 10 days, compared to 20 to 30 days as measured from the date of their last menstruation.

Lead author Prof Roger Gadsby, Warwick Medical School, said: “The precise course of pregnancy sickness is unknown, but this research shows that it occurs at a specific developmental stage, in a specific timeslot. For researchers it narrows our focus in terms of where we look for the cause. If we know that symptoms occur in a very narrow window 8-10 days after ovulation, researchers can concentrate their efforts on that particular stage of development to find the cause of the condition, both anatomically and biochemically.”

Knowing that the onset of NVP has such a tight timeframe will help future research narrow down a biological cause behind it, and help generate targets for treatment development.

An unexpected outcome of the study was a very high prevalence of NVP of 94%, compared to the 80% calculated in prior research. This is explained by the fact that data were regularly collected from participants from before they became pregnant to 60 days after their last menstruation, as opposed to most studies asking women to recall symptoms after they became pregnant.

Prof Gadsby added, “What we’ve shown is that more people get symptoms of pregnancy sickness than has ever been shown before, and one of the reasons for that is that this research has picked up mild early symptoms that tend to fade by 7-8 weeks. In other studies those symptoms would have faded by the time the research started.”

Source: News-Medical.Net